atmospheric results from the nacp’s mid continent intensive field campaign

24
Natasha Miles, Scott Richardson, Arlyn Andrews, Kathy Corbin, Kenneth Davis, Liza Diaz, Scott Denning, Erandi Lokupitiya, Douglas Martins, Paul Shepson, Colm Sweeney, and Tris West ICDC8: September 2009 Atmospheric Results from the NACP’s Mid Continent Intensive Field Campaign

Upload: platt

Post on 21-Jan-2016

33 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Atmospheric Results from the NACP’s Mid Continent Intensive Field Campaign. Natasha Miles, Scott Richardson, Arlyn Andrews, Kathy Corbin, Kenneth Davis, Liza Diaz, Scott Denning, Erandi Lokupitiya, Douglas Martins, Paul Shepson, Colm Sweeney, and Tris West ICDC8: September 2009. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Atmospheric Results from the NACP’s Mid Continent Intensive Field Campaign

Natasha Miles, Scott Richardson, Arlyn Andrews, Kathy Corbin, Kenneth Davis, Liza Diaz, Scott Denning, Erandi Lokupitiya, Douglas Martins, Paul Shepson,

Colm Sweeney, and Tris WestICDC8: September 2009

Atmospheric Results from the NACP’s Mid Continent Intensive Field Campaign

Page 2: Atmospheric Results from the NACP’s Mid Continent Intensive Field Campaign

• Overall goal of Mid-Continental Intensive: Seek convergence between top-down and bottom-up estimates of the regional flux

• “Oversample” the atmosphere in the study region

• Atmospheric results– Purdue Univ / NOAA ALAR

(aircraft) Campaign– NOAA aircraft program– 9 tower sites (NOAA, PSU, U of

Minn)– NOAA Carbon Tracker– CSU SiBcrop-RAMS model– Comparisons to agricultural and

satellite data

LEFRosemount

~ 500 km

Atmospheric results from the NACP’sMid Continental Intensive

Page 3: Atmospheric Results from the NACP’s Mid Continent Intensive Field Campaign

NOAA / Purdue University ALAR

Regional Survey15 – 25 June 2007

Colm Sweeney (NOAA/ESRL)Paul Shepson (Purdue University)Doug Martins (Purdue University)

Front

15 June 2007 17 June 2007

385 ppm

365 ppm

Page 4: Atmospheric Results from the NACP’s Mid Continent Intensive Field Campaign

NOAA / Purdue University ALAR

Lagrangian Flux Estimates: 19 June 2007

In-situ Profiles

Flight Path

Flux = -10.3±2.4 μmol/m2/s

Martins et al., 2009

Regionally-averaged aircraft CO2 flux

Flux tower: soybeans

Flux tower: corn

Tower-based eddy covariance fluxes from the Brooks Field Site near Ames, IA

Page 5: Atmospheric Results from the NACP’s Mid Continent Intensive Field Campaign

8000

200

4000

Alt

itu

de

(m)

8000

200

4000

Alt

itu

de

(m)

8000

200

4000

Alt

itu

de

(m)

8000

4000

Alt

itu

de

(m)

8000

200

4000

8000

200

4000

8000

200

4000

8000

4000

8000

4000

8000

4000

8000

200

4000

8000

200

4000

0 6 120 6 12

0 6 12

0 6 12

0 6 12 0 6 12 0 6 12 0 6 12

0 6 12

0 6 12

0 6 120 6 12

18

0

-15

18

0

-15

18

0

-15

18

0

-15200 200 200 200

Deviation from global mean [CO2]

Climatology of 12 of 16 currently running NOAA aircraft project sites• 2 – 3 profiles / month at each site• Increase in amplitude of the seasonal cycle from west to east

NOAA Aircraft Program CO2 Measurements

C. Sweeney (NOAA)

Page 6: Atmospheric Results from the NACP’s Mid Continent Intensive Field Campaign

PSU Ring 2 towers• Network of 5 cavity ring-down spectroscopy

(Picarro, Inc.) instruments surrounding Iowa (April 2007 – October 2009)– Centerville, IA– Galesville, WI– Kewanee, IL– Mead, NE– Round Lake, MN

• Additional well-calibrated site on Ameriflux tower at Missouri Ozarks, MO

NOAA tall towers in MCI region

• Non-dispersive infrared spectroscopy (LiCor, Inc.) instruments

• LEF (1994 – current) • WBI (July 2007 – current)

U. Of Minn Rosemount* tower• Tunable diode laser instrument• May 2007 – current

* data courtesy of T. Griffis

Rosemount

LEF

Page 7: Atmospheric Results from the NACP’s Mid Continent Intensive Field Campaign

Spatial differences / gradients during 2007 growing season on a daily time scale

• Large differences / gradients for some site pairs

• West Branch - Centerville

Difference Gradient

Page 8: Atmospheric Results from the NACP’s Mid Continent Intensive Field Campaign

Spatial differences / gradients during growing season on a daily time scale

• Large differences /

gradients for some site pairs

• West Branch - Centerville (160 km)

• Other site pairs: lower differences / gradients

• Mead – Centerville (300 km)

• Median differences: 6.0 and 1.7 ppm

• Median gradients: 0.04 and 0.006 ppm/km

Difference Gradient

Page 9: Atmospheric Results from the NACP’s Mid Continent Intensive Field Campaign

Seasonal cycle

• Large variance in seasonal drawdown, despite being separated by ~ 500 km

• 2 groups: 33 – 39 ppm drawdown and 24 – 29 ppm drawdown (difference of about 10 ppm)

Mauna Loawbi aircraft

* NOAA (Andrews/Sweeney) ** U of Minn (Griffis)

Page 10: Atmospheric Results from the NACP’s Mid Continent Intensive Field Campaign

Seasonal cycle

• Large variance in seasonal drawdown, despite being separated by ~ 500 km

• 2 groups: 33 – 39 ppm drawdown and 24 – 29 ppm drawdown (difference of about 10 ppm)

Mauna Loawbi aircraft

* NOAA (Andrews/Sweeney) ** U of Minn (Griffis)

Page 11: Atmospheric Results from the NACP’s Mid Continent Intensive Field Campaign

Seasonal cycle

• Large variance in seasonal drawdown, despite being separated by ~ 500 km

• 2 groups: 33 – 39 ppm drawdown and 24 – 29 ppm drawdown (difference of about 10 ppm)

Mauna Loawbi aircraft

* NOAA (Andrews/Sweeney) ** U of Minn (Griffis)

Page 12: Atmospheric Results from the NACP’s Mid Continent Intensive Field Campaign

Corn NPP in the Mid Continental Intensive region: 2007

T. West

Page 13: Atmospheric Results from the NACP’s Mid Continent Intensive Field Campaign

Corn NPP in the Mid Continental Intensive region: 2007

Sites with larger seasonal [CO2] drawdown- Consistent with “Corn belt” according to NPP

T. West

Page 14: Atmospheric Results from the NACP’s Mid Continent Intensive Field Campaign

Model-data comparisons (forwards results)

SiBcrop-RAMS (K. Corbin; A. Schuh; E. Lokupitiya; A.S. Denning)

• June-August 2007• Regional • Coupled with crop phenology

model for corn and soybean developed by Lokupitiya et al. (2009); *wheat to be added

NOAA-ESRL Carbon Tracker (A. Andrews; A. Jacobson)

• 2007• Global• Optimized to best fit data on

global obs network (not including Ring 2)

http://carbontracker.noaa.govcorn

wheat*

soy

Page 15: Atmospheric Results from the NACP’s Mid Continent Intensive Field Campaign

Observations vs Carbon Tracker: 2007

• Overall drawdown in CT 2008 is too weak• But some features of modeled variability are consistent with obs

- large variability- mm has less drawdown than wbi, rl, and kw in both model and obs

Page 16: Atmospheric Results from the NACP’s Mid Continent Intensive Field Campaign

Obs - model (ppm)

2007

Observations vs Carbon Tracker: 2007

• Suggestive that CT model could be improved by adding crop details• Trajectory analysis: LEF residuals large for southerly trajectories, small for

northerly trajectories

Corn belt sites

Liza Diaz (PSU)

Page 17: Atmospheric Results from the NACP’s Mid Continent Intensive Field Campaign

Observations vs SiBcrop-RAMS: 2007 growing season

• Overall drawdown compares well• Problems with spatial distribution

growing season

Page 18: Atmospheric Results from the NACP’s Mid Continent Intensive Field Campaign

Observations vs SiBcrop-RAMS: 2007 growing season

Corn belt sites

Obs – model (ppm)

Problems with spatial distribution• Corn belt sites: not enough drawdown• Centerville, LEF: too much drawdown• Using more realistic percentages for land cover, especially for

corn, may improve results

Page 19: Atmospheric Results from the NACP’s Mid Continent Intensive Field Campaign

Seasonal cycle: interannual variability

• West Branch (wbi) and Centerville (ce) differ significantly from 2007 to 2008

• From agricultural statistics (NASS), total estimated NPP of corn (T. West) 222 PgC for 2007 207 PgC for 2008

Mauna Loawbi aircraft

* NOAA (Andrews/Sweeney) ** U of Minn (Griffis)

Page 20: Atmospheric Results from the NACP’s Mid Continent Intensive Field Campaign

Flooding in the Midwestern U.S.: June 2008

Dell Creek breach of Lake Delton, WI U.S. Air Force

Cedar Rapids, IA Don Becker (USGS)

Page 21: Atmospheric Results from the NACP’s Mid Continent Intensive Field Campaign

Delay in seasonal drawdown

• 2008 [CO2] minima is delayed by 2 – 4 weeks, compared to 2007

• Effect of flood?

2007 solid2008 dashed

2007

2008

Page 22: Atmospheric Results from the NACP’s Mid Continent Intensive Field Campaign

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350

Day of the Year (DOY)

Av

era

ge

MO

DIS

ND

VI f

or

Iow

a C

rop

s Corn (2007)

Corn (2008)

Soybean (2007)

Soybean (2008)

Satellite-based Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) for Iowa crops

T. West

Page 23: Atmospheric Results from the NACP’s Mid Continent Intensive Field Campaign

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350

Day of the Year (DOY)

Av

era

ge

MO

DIS

ND

VI f

or

Iow

a C

rop

s Corn (2007)

Corn (2008)

Soybean (2007)

Soybean (2008)

Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) for Iowa crops

• Satellite-based: 2-week delay of phenological curve for 2008 compared to 2007, for both corn and soy

T. West

Page 24: Atmospheric Results from the NACP’s Mid Continent Intensive Field Campaign

Summary

• Aircraft and tower results both indicate large spatial gradients between sites despite relatively small site separations

• Seasonal cycle: – Difference amongst sites, some with very large seasonal drawdown

• Comparisons of tower obs to CarbonTracker and SiBcrop-RAMS– Important to model agriculture correctly– Transport important also

• Interannual variability: flooding in June 2008, atmospheric data corroborated by satellite and agricultural statistics data

• What spatial density of tower measurements is necessary? To be answered by including subsets of the Ring 2 data in the inversions

Natasha MilesPenn State [email protected]