asq reliability division october 10, 2019 · 2019-11-03 · asq reliability division october 10,...
TRANSCRIPT
ASQ Reliability Division
October 10, 2019
Timothy M. Hicks, P.E. (Mechanical Performance)
Roch J. Shipley, Ph.D., PE, FASM (Materials)
Structural integrity is ensured in the design phase by a thorough review of a product’s intended use and foreseeable misuse
◦ Testing is performed for verification◦ Materials of construction are reviewed◦ Manufacturing process controls ensure that the design intent is met◦ Documentation addresses operation, maintenance, and inspection, with
warnings
The testing methods utilized for design verification and validation are also critical when it comes to analyzing failures
Today’s focus will be to:◦ Discuss some different aspects of structural integrity testing ◦ Provide an overview of processes utilized to ensure a successful and safe
design◦ Provide guidance to get it right the first time, avoiding any need for failure
analysis
Timothy M. Hicks, PE (Tim)◦ Mechanical Engineer
▪ BS - Michigan Technological University
▪ MS – Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
◦ Industry – 36 years experience
▪ 27 years in design, testing, and manufacturing
▪ 9 years in engineering consulting
Roch J. Shipley, PhD, PE, FASM◦ Materials Engineer
▪ BS and PhD – Illinois Institute of Technology
◦ Industry – 39 years experience
▪ 10 years in manufacturing and corporate research
▪ 29 years in engineering consulting
General overview◦ Wide variety of companies and industries on call
Please ask questions during or after presentation
Broad overview of topics
Don’t hesitate to seek out more information from ◦ colleagues
◦ suppliers
◦ industry groups
◦ technical societies
◦ additional experts
◦ follow-up with us afterwards (contact info at the end)
Requirements Design concept Detailed design Failure Mode Effects Analysis (FMEA)◦ So issues are recognized and avoided to the fullest
extent possible
Assess, test, and validate◦ Software modelling◦ Full scale prototypes◦ Materials samples
Goal is to be both efficient AND complete
Design still in concept phase – Low
Manufacturing in progress – Medium
Products in distribution chain – High
Products in the field – Even higher
Failures have occurred in the field - Highest
Therefore, test early and often!
Thousands of recalls per year Recalls.Gov combines ◦ CPSC (Consumer Product Safety Commission)
◦ NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Admin) 914 recalls of 29 million motor vehicles in 2018
◦ USCG (United States Coast Guard)
◦ EPA (Environmental Protection Agency)
◦ USDA (United States Department of Agriculture)
◦ FDA (Food and Drug Administration)
Compilations on sites such as ◦ https://www.statista.com/topics/3798/product-recalls-
in-the-united-states/
◦ Again, test early and often!
Dimensional
Appearance
Load → Stress◦ Specification
◦ Reasonably foreseeable
Usage / Wear
Maintenance, inspections, service◦ Consequences of deviations
Temperature◦ Operation◦ Shipment, storage, etc.◦ Washing, sterilization (medical devices)
Chemical◦ Operation◦ Biocompatibility◦ Washing, including adjacent components, sterilization, etc.
UV◦ Natural◦ Sterilization
Radiation◦ Sterilization◦ Again, specified vs. reasonably foreseeable◦ Nuclear – another whole area
Metal
Plastic / Polymers
Ceramic
Composite material◦ Concrete
◦ Wood
Concepts apply to all materials, details differ
Casting
Forging
Molding
Welding
Machining ◦ Surface finish◦ Stress concentrators◦ Might remove beneficial grain flow in formed parts◦ Residual stress
Heat treatment
Stamping
Additive (3D printing)
Evaluates all possible failure modes for manufacturing processes and product useage
Critical dimensions, surface finish, etc. Materials / components themselves do not
fail◦ Respond to environment – predictable ways
(engineer’s responsibility) Load / stress – including complex stress states,
residual stress
Chemical / Corrosion
Temperature
Wear
Testing to address potential materials “failures”
Mechanical loads → stress◦ Processing → may introduce residual stress
Residual stress – heating – thermal expansion etc.
Shot peening (beneficial)
Again, verify
◦ Deformation Elastic
Plastic (permanent)
◦ Buckling◦ Fracture
Chemical environment
Wear
Temperature – high or low◦ Thermal expansion and stress
Varies with material
◦ Change in mechanical properties
◦ Change in lubricant performance
◦ Enable or accelerate chemical reactions
E.g. Oxidation, changes in material
TESTING ESTABLISHES & QUANTIFIES◦ Feasibility◦ Product specifications
TESTING VALIDATES◦ Product concepts - prototypes◦ Product specifications◦ Product performance◦ Manufacturing processes◦ Aging/wear-out mechanisms◦ Failure modes
TESTING MONITORS◦ Manufacturing processes◦ Product aging / wear◦ Product performance
Standard properties and test methods
◦ Publicly available
◦ Or company standards
◦ Clear communication all along the supply chain
Not handbook and similar “typical” or average properties.
Not supplier typicals
◦ What happens when supplier changes?
ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) – 12,500+ documents
ANSI (American National Standards Institute) 9,500+ documents
SAE (Society for Automotive Engineers) 10,000+ documents
IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) – 1,100+ documents
ISO (International Organization for Standardization) – 22,600+ documents
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) – 9,000+ documents
International Telecommunications Union (ITU) 4,000+ documents
Chemical composition◦ Plastics less standardized than metals◦ Plasticizers, additives for UV exposure
Mechanical properties Heat treatment Microstructural requirements Non-destructive examination Manufacturing processes◦ Including personnel, e.g. welding certifications
Surface finish, coatings, friction Corrosion and wear resistance At temperatures of interest And more Control with test program
Materials
Test procedures◦ Match functional requirements
Accredited laboratory
Supplier certification with every order, if feasible◦ Protect yourself and your company
◦ Avoid misunderstandings
◦ Keep on file
Component Sub-system System Full product
Cyclic or peak load Accelerated durability Field performance Dormant state shelf life (e.g. airbags, oxygen
system on aircraft, fire detection systems)
Functional testing Performance testing Reliability testing Environmental testing Mechanical testing Mean time between failures (MTBF) prediction◦ Many product lives follow Weibull distribution◦ Important for setting warranty terms
Conformance testing Safety certification◦ Determine useful life and factor of safety
Product Testing (Mechanical Lab/Field)◦ Functional Testing◦ Stress Testing◦ Performance Testing◦ Environmental Testing
Materials Characterization (Analytical Lab)◦ Analytical Chemistry◦ Chemical composition and microstructure◦ Microscopy◦ Surface Analysis◦ Mechanical Property Testing
Finite Element Analysis/Modeling (FEA) Experimental Stress Analysis◦ Strain gages◦ Various coatings
Component Testing◦ Prototype◦ Early production
System Testing◦ Prototype◦ Early production◦ Audit
Powerful tool to evaluate design alternatives
Inputs must match real world Material properties, grid size, boundary
conditions, temperature, etc.
Validate model with physical test to obtain correlation
Do the materials of construction ◦ Meet specification?◦ Appropriate for the application? ◦ Behave as expected?
Much can often be learned through examination of failed test specimens◦ Loads ◦ Temperature◦ Chemical environment◦ Weld process◦ Contact/witness marks, wear, etc.◦ Assembly
Scientific Method – hypothesis testing◦ Has anything changed?
Many tests are destructive, so statistical analysis is necessary◦ Integrate with Statistical Process Control (SPC), etc.
Yield◦ Affected by temperature, strain rate
Ultimate◦ Affected by temperature
In aggressive environment◦ Stronger is not always better!
Fatigue◦ Affected by corrosion
From Instron, one supplier of testing machines
*
Force/Area
Change / Original Length
Location is part of specification
Separately manufactured test bars◦ Castings, forgings, etc.
◦ Avoid misinterpretation – properties may vary
Directionality may be important
Hardness correlated with tensile strength◦ Considered non-destructive
Goal – reproducible results – material property
Specimen geometries (proportional)
Test as received or after environmental exposure
Strain rate (applied force)
Stress rate (change in length)
Temperature◦ ASTM E21 if elevated temperature
Report as desired◦ Engineering stress strain – based on initial
dimensions
◦ True stress strain –
account for decreasing area
show strain hardening
Ductile, micro void coalescence, dimpled rupture
Brittle◦ Cleavage, transgranular
◦ Intergranular
◦ Can result from both material and environmental conditions
Ultimate stress – overload
Progressive (time dependent)◦ Constant stress
Stress corrosion cracking
Hydrogen embrittlement
Metal embrittlement
Creep, stress rupture
◦ Cyclic stress - fatigue
Mean, alternating,
R.R. Moore – mean is 0, fully reversed
Environment surrounds the specimen
Reference: ASM Handbook of Failure Analysis and Prevention, (Volume 11), ASM International, 2002.
Measure energy to fracture, e.g. Charpy
Applicable to metals and non-metals◦ Steels exhibit ductile – brittle transition with temp.
Test as received or after env. exposure
Plane strain fracture toughness
A material property
Measure of material resistance to crack propagation
Used in damage tolerant design◦ For highly stressed parts in which cracks are likely
to develop
◦ How often should the component be inspected so that a crack will be detected before it grows to critical length
Because materials and properties may vary throughout a component
State of stress may also vary
Full scale component/systems tests are often performed
CETestGroup.Com
Ride the Ducks – Seattle Accident 2015- WWII vintage single use combat vehicles
- Vehicles stretched repurposed for tourism including front axles being rebuilt but were not verified for application or repetitive loading / usage
- After initial front axle fractures during use, no analysis was performed- Implemented repair that was insufficient and poorly executed, and
covered up ability to visually inspect for cracks- Catastrophic front axle failure resulted in loss of vehicle control, causing
a head on collision, with multiple fatalities and injuries
Ride the Ducks – Seattle Accident 2015 con’t:
Options available to avoid failure and accident:- Design analysis at beginning would have shown the axles had an inherent
crack initiation point – groove cut to improve turning radius performance- Materials and stress analysis for developing field repair- Ultrasonic, magnaflux, or X-ray testing during inspections would have
detected cracking before fracture
“Trust but verify…”