7/25/2019 Argumentation Scheme

1/1

TABLEOFARGUMENTATION:

I. So is International Law, Law? p1: ipl is respected

p2:ipl does have codifed sources

p3: ipl is enorced

Concl1: ipl is law and quite siilar to

the !asic national le"al s#steII. Sources o I$L Concl2:international pu!lic law has

valid sources o law

$1:Custoar# international law

$2:esta!lished sources o international

law

$3: transerred natural law sources

III. International pu!lic law%&he'niversal Law

Concl3:Ipl is enorced and respected$1:respectin" a law (defnition

e)aples*

$2:enorceent o ipl as !asic as it "ets

(+ d-ato ar"uent*

Concl: Ipl is close to the utopic status

that /o!ert no0ic proposes

$1:the inial state upholds !asic

ri"hts o the citi0en

$2: ipl upholds the ri"ht o retaliationthrou"h art1 'C4 and !ans the use

o orce

$articular case: eu installentI5. Conclusion Concl1+concl2+concl36thesis

7international law is a valid installent

o law in the supranational level8