apwc _2

18
Massive MIMO Mustafa Khaleel Kareem AA Difar Alnaser Zaid

Upload: kareem-difar

Post on 09-Apr-2017

262 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: APWC _2

Massive MIMO

Mustafa KhaleelKareem AA Difar

Alnaser Zaid

Page 2: APWC _2

Contents

MIMO Single user MIMO & Multi-user MIMO What is Massive MIMO ? Massive MIMO Key Features Critical Issues and Solutions TDD and FDD Pilot Contamination Pilot Open-Loop Power Control Facts

Page 3: APWC _2

MIMO MIMO (multiple input, multiple output) is an

antenna technology for wireless communications in which multiple antennas are used at both the source (transmitter) and the destination (receiver)

Page 4: APWC _2

Single user MIMO & Multi-user MIMO SU-MIMO: the data of a single user is

transmitted simultaneously on several parallel data streams (All streams to one user )

MU-MIMO : the individual streams are assigned to various users (Larger diversity gain than single user MIMO)

Page 5: APWC _2

What is Massive MIMO ?

A very large antenna array at each base station

A large number of users are served simultaneously

Page 6: APWC _2

Massive MIMO Key Features

Benefits from the (many) excess antennas

Differences with MU MIMO in conventional cellular systems

Main benefits:

huge spectral efficiency and high reliability

high energy efficiency

Page 7: APWC _2

Critical Issues

Gains are not that big with not-so-many antennas

Massive MIMO seems to be more “uplink driven”

Practical effects are not well investigated

Page 8: APWC _2

Solutions Wireless Communication suffers from attenuation in signal strength and

Interference between users and MIMO is well Known solution against Massive MIMO promises additional advantage over standard solutions.

SNR=(\\h\\2 *σ2m )*M/ σ2n

M is number of elements antenna . Shannon theorem Capacity (bits/sec )= Available spectrum (Hz)*spectral efficiency(dB)Where C is known as capacity of channel, B is known as bandwidth of the signal, S/N is known as signal to noise ratio. MT is the number of antennas used at the transmitter side & MR is the number of antennas used at receiver side.

Page 9: APWC _2

Expression related to Massive MIMO

Page 10: APWC _2

We need a pilot signal for Channel state information (CSI) estimation , but there are two problems

First, optimal downlink pilots should be mutually orthogonal between the antennas. This means that the amount of time frequency resources needed for downlink pilots scales as the number of antennas, so a massive MIMO system would require up to a hundred times more such resources than a conventional system.

Second, the number of channel responses that each terminal must estimate is also proportional to the number of base station antennas. Hence, the uplink resources needed to inform the base station about the channel responses would be up to a hundred times larger than in conventional systems [1] [4].

The solution is to operate in TDD mode, and rely on reciprocity between the uplink and downlink channels [1]

A:TDD operation is better than FDD in Massive MIMO because in TDD we need  

TDD and FDD

Page 11: APWC _2

Pilot Contamination Pilot :signals from resources are used for synchronization and equalization

How we eliminate the interference btw users?

Techniques to Mitigate Pilot Contamination

Pilots are used to estimate the channel state information

1 .Pilot Open-Loop Power Control2 .Less Aggressive Pilot Reuse

3 .Soft Pilot Reuse

 

Page 12: APWC _2

Pilot Open-Loop Power Control

a pilot open loop power control (pilot OLPC) scheme that allows the terminal to adjust the transmit power of its pilot signal .based on its estimate of the pathloss to its serving BS

Page 13: APWC _2

Less Aggressive Pilot Reuse Pilot reuse is analogous to the traditional frequency reuse in the

sense that terminals within the pilot reuse area can utilize only a fraction of the time-frequency resources, during the channel estimation phase.

The pilot reuse factor 1/U is the rate at which pilot resources may bereused in the network, where U is the number of cells that are assigned orthogonal pilots .

Pilot reuse

Page 14: APWC _2

Soft Pilot Reuse

assign additional orthogonal pilot resources to cell-edge terminals, with reuse factor 1/UE .

total pilot resources spent on cell-edge terminals is therefore · UE. pilot transmission by the rest of the terminals is (1 − ρ)K · U .

Page 15: APWC _2

mmWave and massive MIMO in cellular Directivity of massive MIMO compensates for high mmWave

attenuation, reduces multipath and multiuser interference. mmWave frequencies reduce the size required for massive MIMO

antenna arrays.

Massive MIMO testbed, Lund University, 2014

Page 16: APWC _2

Facts  

1.Distributed network densification is preferable over massive MIMO if the average throughput per UT should be increased.

2.More antenna increase the coverage probability ,but more BSs lead to linear increase in the area spectral efficiency.

3 .If the cell radius will be decreased the data rate will increase and the users can be increased. Because the pilot contamination is decreased.

4.Massive MIMO uses spatial-division multiplexing such that the different data streams occupy the same frequencies and time.

5 .we can not increase the number of Antennas exponentially because the time spent acquiring CSI which grows with both the number of service antennas and the number of users.

6 .An advantage of matched filtering and conjugate beamforming is that the Massive MIMO signal processing can be performed locally at each antenna, . This in turn permits a decentralized architecture for the antenna array, which lends great resilience to the system. For example, if half the antennas are lost from a lightning strike, the remaining antennas do exactly what they did before. Likewise, during periods of slack demand, some antennas can be put into sleep mode, for improved energy efficiency, without affecting the operations of the others.

7 .Massive MIMO a scalable technology: any number of base station antennas can be usefully employed with no tightening of array tolerances. Extra antennas always help. Ins contrast, if an assumed channel response is used the technology is ultimately not scalable.

Page 17: APWC _2

References

1.Division of Communication Systems Department of Electrical Engineering (ISY) Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden

www.commsys.isy.liu.s 2.Nimay Ch. Giri1, Anwesha Sahoo2, J. R. Swain3, P. Kumar4, A. Nayak5, P.

Debogoswami6 Lecturer, Department of ECE, 2,3,4,5,6B.Tech Scholar, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Odisha, India

3.http://www.researchgate.net/post/What_is_the_acheivable_Massive_MIMO_capacity(Emil Björnson)

4.http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijap/2014/848071/ 5.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhncADqR9rg 6.Thomas L. Marzetta heads the LargeScale Antenna Systems Group in the Network Energy Program at Bell Labs in Murray Hill 7.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imLiaLQGmB8

Page 18: APWC _2

Thank you