an experience in the selection of distribution planning ... · • aspen distriview, milsoft...

17
An Experience in the Selection of Distribution Planning Software and What Came of It 2018 RMEL Distribution Engineers Workshop Lone Tree, Colorado Wyatt W. Pierce, PE

Upload: others

Post on 19-Oct-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • An Experience in the Selection of Distribution Planning Software

    and What Came of It

    2018 RMEL Distribution Engineers WorkshopLone Tree, ColoradoWyatt W. Pierce, PE

  • • Selection Process• ABB/Ventyx FEEDERALL to CYME CYMDIST

    • Thoughts on Integration• IT systems• Users

    • Cool Things You Might Like to See• Project Manager• Map features• Time series analyses• Embedded Python (e.g. menu, keywords)• Batch and automation

    Included Today

  • • ABB power flow products (CADPAD, FeederAll) in use since the 1980’s

    • FEEDERALL development slowed dramatically around 2006, ceased around 2012

    • Lack of support and necessary features prompted search for alternatives

    • Testing the waters 2007-2011 with trial licenses and student help• 2013 RFI and budget support

    Making the Leap

  • • Secure relational database• On and off network usage• Active users group• Geographic display and landbase import possible• Harmonics, motor start, secondary mesh, arc flash, VVO,

    scriptable, CIM export• Early cut list

    • ASPEN DistriView, Milsoft Windmil, DIgSILENT PowerFactory, ETAP, OTI, EDD

    Must Haves / No compromise

  • • Remaining products to evaluate• Considering the cost factor

    • License management• Reading from GIS (ArcFM)

    Trial License Experience

    Product Technical Prowess

    User Engagement

    Smart Roadmap

    Ease of Use

    Helpful Features

    CYMDIST 1 1 1 1 1Synergi Electric 3 2 3 2 3PSS Sincal 2 3 2 3 2

  • Thoughts on Integration

  • • CYME Gateway runs weekly

    • Non-GIS attributes persisted in FENIX tables

    • Engineers have local SQL database, sync up and down as needed

    • Multiple Load Models from meter data

    • Easy to deploy custom tools to all users

    Integration with I/T

  • • Pain level ≠ 0• CYME offers more than just power flow & protection• Overall pretty easy to get results like for like if that’s what

    you’re after: Training, repetition, patience, goals

    • Is there ever a good time for new computers or software?

    • Three years in, users have a good handle on the basics

    User Experience

  • Cool Things

  • • Build in a planning study calendar for projects and growth

    • Move up and down between years, modifications

    • Group, rename, disable modifications

    • Create mutually exclusive scenarios, compare results

    Cool Thing #1 – Project Manager

  • • Stack Maps• Google Maps & MapQuest

    background• DWG, DXF, SHP, KML, KMZ, GDS

    • Add vaults drawn to scale• Add consultant drawings• Export one line and results tags to

    KML for consumption in Google Earth

    • ‘Save to Database’ for future

    Cool Thing #2 – Maps

  • Cool Thing #3 – Time Series FeaturesPower flow over time• Long Term Dynamics (short duration)

    • Device delay (tap change, BESS, reclose time, etc.)

    • Load Flow with Profiles (long duration)• Pull in SCADA, DER profiles, etc.

    Short circuit over time• Sequence of Operations

  • • Embedded in user interface• Other IDEs also okay

    • Create custom CymPy keywords• Use them in reports, device filters, etc.

    • Create custom scripts• Mass create or modify devices

    • From Excel data, etc.• Export to Excel, SQL, etc.

    • Launch other applications with CYME data as parameter

    • Encode the operation of switched devices

    Cool Thing #4 – CYME Python

  • CymPy Example

    IEEE 738 Ampacity Rating

    Script Credits:Lance Porter, Tori McGee

  • Cool Thing #4 – Batch Analysis

  • • We feel we made the correct choice for our needs• CYME Gateway + CYMDIST + FENIX Tables• CYME WEST project deploying next year

    • Lots of alternatives for the buyer• Include the stuff that matters in your comparison matrix

    • Study process• User feedback• Reporting requirements• Product integration• Vendor support and flexibility

    Looking Back

  • [email protected]

    An Experience in the Selection of Distribution Planning Softwareand What Came of It