web 2.0 perception - thiyagusuri

PEDAGOGICAL BENEFITS OF WEB 2.0 APPLICATIONS

K. ThiyaguAssistant Professor

Dr.Sivanthi Aditanar College of EducationTiruchendur 628 215

E-mail: thiyagusuri@gmail.com

Creating Generation “C” ……….through web 2.0

Collaborator

Creator

Critical Thinker

OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

04/08/23 3K.THIYAGU

OBJECTIVES …..OBJECTIVES …..

04/08/23 4K.THIYAGU

Objectives ………

OBJECTIVES …..OBJECTIVES …..

04/08/23 6K.THIYAGU

HYPOTHESES OF THE STUDY

04/08/23 7K.THIYAGU

Hypotheses…….

METHODOLOGY

SURVEY METHOD

04/08/23 9K.THIYAGU

SAMPLE

Sample PG Students

Sampling Techniques Random Sampling

Total Sample Size 240

04/08/23 10K.THIYAGU

TOOL

self-prepared questionnaire

Perceptions on the pedagogical benefits of web 2.0 applications as the subject content. In order to achieve the objectives of the study, the investigators used a self-prepared questionnaire

(W2PQ - KT = Web 2.0 Perception Questionnaire –K. Thiyagu).

04/08/23 11K.THIYAGU

RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY

Reliability :

test-retest technique - correlation co-efficient - 0.89.

Validity :

Content-validity,

04/08/23 12K.THIYAGU

DATA ANALYSIS

ANALYSIS CALCULATIONS

Descriptive Analysis Percentage analysis, Mean & SD

Inferential Analysis Independent sample t-test

04/08/23 13K.THIYAGU

ANALYSIS OF DATA

04/08/23 14K.THIYAGU

Students' Familiarity With Web 2.0 Tools

Basic web 2.0 Skills?

Basic Web 2.0 Skills?

Is there is any significant difference? Gender N Mean Std df ‘t’ value Remarks at 5%

level

Male 87 29.41 6.99238 0.05 NS

Female 153 29.36 5.70

Age N Mean Std df ‘t’ value Remarks at 5% level

Below 25 201 30.52 6.15238 1.81 NS

Above 25 39 32.06 4.67

Course of study N Mean Std df ‘t’ value Remarks at 5% level

M.A. 110 29.87 7.84238 1.37 NS

M.SC., 130 30.96 5.43

Summing up

• WHAT IS SPECIAL ON 2nd FEBRUARY 2013? • WHAT IS THE NAME OF THE YEAR 2013 IN THE

INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ?

• WORLD WETLAND DAY – 2ND FEB

• The UN has declared 2013 the International year of Water Cooperation

REFERENCES

• Keegan, Desmond. (2002) “The Future of Learning: From e-Learning to m-Learning”, Information Analyses; Opinion Papers.

• Lam, Paul and McNaught, Carmel (2007) "Management of an e-Learning Evaluation Project: The e3Learning Model”, Journal of Interactive Learning Research, Vol.18, n3 p365-380.

• Littlejohn, Allison., et al. (2009) “Characterising Effective e-Learning Resources”, Computers & Education, Vol.50, No.3, pp.757-771

• Rachna Rathore (2009) “Effective teaching through e-learning. Edu tracks. Aug.2007. Vol-6.No-12, p.8

• Sanjaya Mishra And Rames C.Sharma (2005) “Development of e-learning in India, University News, vol. 43,No.11, p.9.

• Starkman, Neal. (2007) “e-Learning: Going the Distance”, T.H.E. Journal, Vol.34, No.2, pp.18-24.

• Thiyagu.K (2009) “M-learning is the future learning” Edutracks, volume 8 – no.6. pp1-3