web 2.0 perception - thiyagusuri
DESCRIPTION
This ppt describes the perception towards web 2.0 tools among the post graduate students. this paper was presented at sri saradha college of education, salemTRANSCRIPT
PEDAGOGICAL BENEFITS OF WEB 2.0 APPLICATIONS
K. ThiyaguAssistant Professor
Dr.Sivanthi Aditanar College of EducationTiruchendur 628 215
E-mail: [email protected]
Creating Generation “C” ……….through web 2.0
Collaborator
Creator
Critical Thinker
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
04/08/23 3K.THIYAGU
OBJECTIVES …..OBJECTIVES …..
04/08/23 4K.THIYAGU
Objectives ………
OBJECTIVES …..OBJECTIVES …..
04/08/23 6K.THIYAGU
HYPOTHESES OF THE STUDY
04/08/23 7K.THIYAGU
Hypotheses…….
METHODOLOGY
SURVEY METHOD
04/08/23 9K.THIYAGU
SAMPLE
Sample PG Students
Sampling Techniques Random Sampling
Total Sample Size 240
04/08/23 10K.THIYAGU
TOOL
self-prepared questionnaire
Perceptions on the pedagogical benefits of web 2.0 applications as the subject content. In order to achieve the objectives of the study, the investigators used a self-prepared questionnaire
(W2PQ - KT = Web 2.0 Perception Questionnaire –K. Thiyagu).
04/08/23 11K.THIYAGU
RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY
Reliability :
test-retest technique - correlation co-efficient - 0.89.
Validity :
Content-validity,
04/08/23 12K.THIYAGU
DATA ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS CALCULATIONS
Descriptive Analysis Percentage analysis, Mean & SD
Inferential Analysis Independent sample t-test
04/08/23 13K.THIYAGU
ANALYSIS OF DATA
04/08/23 14K.THIYAGU
Students' Familiarity With Web 2.0 Tools
Basic web 2.0 Skills?
Basic Web 2.0 Skills?
Is there is any significant difference? Gender N Mean Std df ‘t’ value Remarks at 5%
level
Male 87 29.41 6.99238 0.05 NS
Female 153 29.36 5.70
Age N Mean Std df ‘t’ value Remarks at 5% level
Below 25 201 30.52 6.15238 1.81 NS
Above 25 39 32.06 4.67
Course of study N Mean Std df ‘t’ value Remarks at 5% level
M.A. 110 29.87 7.84238 1.37 NS
M.SC., 130 30.96 5.43
Summing up
• WHAT IS SPECIAL ON 2nd FEBRUARY 2013? • WHAT IS THE NAME OF THE YEAR 2013 IN THE
INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ?
• WORLD WETLAND DAY – 2ND FEB
• The UN has declared 2013 the International year of Water Cooperation
REFERENCES
• Keegan, Desmond. (2002) “The Future of Learning: From e-Learning to m-Learning”, Information Analyses; Opinion Papers.
• Lam, Paul and McNaught, Carmel (2007) "Management of an e-Learning Evaluation Project: The e3Learning Model”, Journal of Interactive Learning Research, Vol.18, n3 p365-380.
• Littlejohn, Allison., et al. (2009) “Characterising Effective e-Learning Resources”, Computers & Education, Vol.50, No.3, pp.757-771
• Rachna Rathore (2009) “Effective teaching through e-learning. Edu tracks. Aug.2007. Vol-6.No-12, p.8
• Sanjaya Mishra And Rames C.Sharma (2005) “Development of e-learning in India, University News, vol. 43,No.11, p.9.
• Starkman, Neal. (2007) “e-Learning: Going the Distance”, T.H.E. Journal, Vol.34, No.2, pp.18-24.
• Thiyagu.K (2009) “M-learning is the future learning” Edutracks, volume 8 – no.6. pp1-3
