use of ground penetrating radar (gpr)

Post on 27-Feb-2022

9 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

1SINTEF Building and Infrastructure

Use of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) for pavement assesment

Inge HoffSINTEF Building and Infrastructure

2SINTEF Building and Infrastructure

NTNU/SINTEF bought this type ofequipment October 2007

3SINTEF Building and Infrastructure

Principle Radar signals transmittedReflection dependent on:

Dielectric propertiesConductivity

Reflected signal used to form image of layers and objectsbeneath surface

4SINTEF Building and Infrastructure

5SINTEF Building and Infrastructure

6SINTEF Building and Infrastructure

• Step-frequency radar

• Controls up to 63 antennas

• GPS/Total Station interface

• 30 MHz - 1000 MHz (2 GHz option)

GeoScopeGeoScopeTMTM 33--dimensional GPRdimensional GPR

UltraUltra--wideband wideband antenna arrayantenna array

• 100 MHz - 2.0 GHz

• 16 - 63 antenna elements

• 1.2 - 2.4 meter swath width

•3.75 - 7.5 cm antenna element spacing

ProductsProducts

7SINTEF Building and Infrastructure

Technical properties

Frequency range 100MHz – 2GHzNo of antenna elements 31Speed of measurements 2-80 km/tWidt 2.4 meterDepth range 1-3 meter

8SINTEF Building and Infrastructure

Areas of appliaction (roads)

Rehabilitation (inspection before planning)

Control of rehabilitation

Quality control of new roads

Localisation of objects in the ground

9SINTEF Building and Infrastructure

Other appliactions

AirportsRunways, taxiways (similar to roads)

RailwaysFine graded material in ballast

Bridges Coverage over reinforcementDamages

TunnelsAir voids behind frost protection walls

Other: water and sewer pipes, forensic, archaeology, etc

10SINTEF Building and Infrastructure

11SINTEF Building and Infrastructure

12SINTEF Building and Infrastructure

13SINTEF Building and Infrastructure

Measurements

14SINTEF Building and Infrastructure

Tunel wall Ila

Rock surface

Concrete

Void

15SINTEF Building and Infrastructure

Conclusions

Relatively new tool in NorwayInterpretation of results is not straigth forwardStandard investigation before rehabilitationCost effectiveCombination with other methods of investigation

FWD, coring, etc

Some modification of hardware necessaryWill be very usefull with some adjustments

top related