show me the money: converible debt vs. preferred equity for seed fundraising

Post on 06-May-2015

922 Views

Category:

Economy & Finance

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Presentation on the pros/cons of convertible debt vs. preferred equity in seed stage financings of start-ups.

TRANSCRIPT

“Show Me the $$$$!”…Session 4:

Monday, January 13, 2014

General Assembly / RosePaul Investments Event

Insiders guide to Debt vs. Equity, and Key Deal Terms

Tom Wisniewski

RosePaul Investments

Thanks to everyone that

attended SMT$ 4 on

Mon @GA.

Here is the document

that we used.

My contact info is on

p.22, and some Bio

information is on pp. 4 &

5.

Cheers,

-TW

confidential

1

Agenda

I. Kick-off and Introductions

II. Intro to Debt vs. Equity, etc.

III. Panel Discussion and Q & A

• BREAK: Networking and Beverages

IV. Deeper Dive and Best Practices

• WRAP-UP: Networking and Beverages

confidential

2

Why are we here?

Start-up raising capital soon/now

Founder / Prospective founder: not raising, looking to

get up to speed

Investor / prospective investor

Seminar Rationale:

The Challenge…

Lots of terms and complexity

Lots of noise, lots of conflicting descriptions and

advice.

Stakes seem high: mistakes costly

• Bad deal…buyers remorse, unpleasant “surprises”

later

• Scare-off Investors (or founders!)

confidential

3

So….. what helps? Invest some time to:

Understand the basics (and the rationale).

Demystify and Prioritize: Not everything is important

Understand the “other guy’s” position: investor

perspective.

…….learn some best practices from some insiders and

your fellow colleagues.

confidential

4

After B-school: joined a start-up management consulting firm Mitchell Madison

Group; focus on Strategy/Operations/IT for financial services, tech, outsourcing,

private equity/VC clients (1993 to 2000)

Walker Digital: helped set-up and run an early “internet incubator” (2000)

Independent Advisor / Turn-arounds: Advised VC and PE Firms on portfolio

company strategy and new investments; joined the management team of two

companies

Currently:

• Early stage investor and advisor to start-ups

• Investor and advisor to VC and PE funds

• Member and director at New York Angels

Tom Wisniewski: My background

Born in NYC; grew-up in Montclair, NJ

Physics and Philosophy major undergrad

(Clark University); MBA at Tuck School

(Dartmouth)

1st Job: Programmer at Morgan Stanley then

moved to Investment Banking

confidential

Tom Wisniewski: Investor Profile Direct “Angel” Investor in Companies

• $25K-250K investments; Typical valuations: $1-5 Million,

• Typical Stage: at least some “product” done, some customer/sales traction

• Sector focus: Opportunistic generally within internet/software space;

- fair amount of Saas B2B, and consumer “marketplace” models, ecommerce enablers.

- NOT (or not much?): hardware, heathcare/pharma, cleantech

• NYC based: 50% investments in NYC area companies; total of ~80% NE overall (e.g

Boston, DC), 20% West Coast.

• Examples:

- Sociocast (social/behavioral big data analytics)

- LiveLook (Saas, live collaboration sales/service platform)

- Anvato (Ad insertion to live video streaming via proprietary machine vision)

- Moveline (Uber for the moving industry)

- Bizodo (Saas, paperwork automation; “Adobe 2.0” internet document sharing)

- Movio (Digital “RedBox”; content delivery via “last 100 ft” of wifi internet)

- HeTexted (Relationship advice forum generating content, media opportunities)

- Wanderu (Kayak for ground transportation)

- DealFlicks (a “Priceline” or “Hotel.com” for movie theater tickets)

- iCharts (tool that enables engaging, sharable, embedible chart content)

Investor in Funds

• In addition to direct investments in start-ups, invest in VC and PE funds.

• Examples:

- Social Starts (Seed fund for start-ups leveraging the Social Web)

- Brooklyn Bridge Ventures (Charlie O’Donnell’s fund)

- Entrepreneurs Roundtable Accelerator (ERA Fund)

- Greycroft Partners (Venture Fund)

- ff Venture Capital (Fund)5

confidential

6

Better understanding of subject.

A set of specific insights that will *change* your approach.

A “to-do” list: starting point(s), actions, things to try.

A set of recommended resources to consult and learn more

from.

A few new relationships with others in the NYC start-

up/fundraising ecosystem: fellow entrepreneurs, investors, etc.

Answers to specific questions that you might have.

What would I like you to walk away with?

confidential

So….what questions do you have about Debt, Equity, Term

Sheets, etc.?

7

xxx

confidential

II. Intro to Debt vs. Equity

8

confidential

9

Context: Common Sources of Fundraising Capital

Who/what are

they?

• People you already

know, that trust

you, and (maybe)

understand your

venture

• Experienced early stage

investors (individuals or a group)

• Accredited Investors.

• Angel investing is not their “job”;

may not be F/T endeavor

• E.g.: NY Angels, GoldenSeeds

• Firm with multiple professionals that

raises, invests and manages

individual funds (other people’s $)

• Working F/T (this is their job…)

• E.g.: Greycroft, RRE, Union Square

Angel InvestmentFriends and

FamilyVenture Capital

“You”

aka Bootstrapped

Earlier Stage Later Stage

Round Size $: • $10’s of K

to $100K

• $100’s of K

to $1M+

• $500K to

$1.5M

Investment Size $: $5K – $10’s of K • $25K – $75K • $250K-$750K

Valuation (Pre-

Mon):

• < $1 M • $1 – 5 M • $5-10 M

“Seed” VC “Traditional Series A” VC

• $5M-$15M

• $3M – $5M

• $10 – 25 M

“Seed”

confidential

10

1. Iterate on ideas

2. Refine idea; test tech / business case

3. Bootstrap; build/test Prototype

4. Early customer validation

5. Develop “pitch”: gather input/interest

6. Bootstrap more; refine prototype, business case

7. Pitch and receive F&F investment. Terms?

8. Build/validate/refine….Build/validate/refine

9. Pitch Experienced Investors: Angels, Seed VC

10. Term Sheets, negotiation, etc.

Debt, Equity and Deal Terms…..How/When does it fit in?

How much does it

matter?

Very, very

Little

Starts to

Matter

(Maybe!?)

Starts to

Really

Matter

(a lot!?)

[.....life continues on: growth, financings, death/sale of company]

confidential

11

Debt = A loan. You borrow $, owe interest, pay back interest/

principal. E.g. Mortgage on a home; credit cards

• Borrower:

- Rationale: source of capital, use now pay back over time +

plus a fee (e.g. interest)

- Risk: can’t pay back principal/interest; loose assets?, bad

credit rating/reputation?, Interests only partially aligned with

investors; Loss of flexibility (e.g. Covenants, restrictions)

• Lender:

- Rationale: Believe borrower can definitely repay, Earn fee

(e.g. interest); “senior” to equity = paid “first”, before equity;

backed by assets or cashflow

- Risk: default; partial payback; interests only partially aligned

with borrower

Basic Definitions: Debt

confidential

12

Equity = Stock; Ownership Interest in a company. You sell a

piece of your company, receive capital in return. E.g. shares of

“GOOG”, owning 50% of a apartment building

• Company/Seller:

- Rationale: source of capital, no need to “pay back”, more

alignment of interests with investors

- Risk: “Cost” more that alternatives?, less control?

• Investor/Buyer:

- Rationale: “share of the upside”; rights to future profits and

sale proceeds ; more alignment of interests with company

- Risk: “Share of the downside”; Company has losses,

Company is alive but “never” is sold, Company goes out of

business

Basic Definitions: Equity

confidential

13

Common Equity: Basic ownership interest in a company..

• Common Equity = founders equity, equity for other employees

• Options = rights to buy Common Equity at a price, during a term.

Valuation: in order to “buy/sell” shares of equity, a price per share

for the company must be agreed on.

• Setting price/share really same as setting “valuation” of

company.

Most common form: Stock Delaware C-Corp;

• Most of the details are defined by DE law.

More Relevant Definitions: Common Equity

confidential

14

Preferred Equity (or “Priced Round”): “Same” as Common + a

defined set of “preferences” or extra rights, beyond what common

has.

• Economic rights:

- Interest: earn interest on investment

- Liquidation preference: in the event of sale, get paid

investment (and return) before common is paid

• Control rights:

- Board Seats

- Approval of key company actions: financings, sale, ETC.

- Rights to convert to common, right to buy future equity (to

maintain % ownership)

• Valuation: [Like Common Equity] in order to “buy” shares of

equity valuation of the company must be defined.

• Most typical form: “Straight” preferred (non-participating

preferred), with 4%-9% interest.

- Most “preferences” = downside protection (when things go

well, everyone converts to common equity

More Relevant Definitions: Preferred Equity

confidential

15

Convertible Debt: a “loan” …..that converts to equity in pre-

defined ways, circumstances

• Loan Interest rate, defined term (6months – 2 years)

• Conversion: Debt converts to Equity when

- Qualified Financing

- Sale of Company

- End of Term

• No “Valuation” (or other terms, controls): Defined formula for

conversion, e.g. price for buying equity.

- Discount to Next Round (Qualified Financing): 5% - 40%

discount

- Cap: Valuation (and therefore price/share) will be maximum

of $2M - $15+. Uncapped Notes are very rare.

Most typical form:

• Cumulative interest, rate 4%-8%,

• 18 month term,

• 20-25% discount

• Valuation Cap at $3-5M? (usually set ~ “current” valuation)

More Relevant Definitions: Convertible Debt (Note, etc.)

confidential

III. Panel Discussion and Q & A

16

Introductions: Background on you and your firm

In the last 12 months: convertible debt? Equity?

What like/hate of each and why?

Any interesting stories?

Thoughts on valuation?

Other 1 or 2 Terms that really matter? Why?

confidential

IV. Deeper Dive and Best Practices

17

confidential

D vs. E: Key Pro/Con

Convertible Debt Preferred Equity

Company/

Founders

Pro: Speed/ ease, lower cost,

defer valuation (?), rolling

close?

Pro: Defines valuation/terms(?),

advantage for next round,

aligned interests

Con: Unaligned interests,

payback loan (or F*cked?)

Con: More time/complexity,

higher cost, must define

valuation, agree on terms

Investors Pro: Speed/ ease, lower cost Pro: Defined price (know what

you are buying), preferences

compensate for risk, and offer

downside protection

Con: Uncertain price?, lack of

rights (e.g. pro-rata)

Con: More time/complexity,

higher cost,

• Its an Option: want upside

• Discount not enough for risk

• Works for: round <$1M?, As

a Bridge, for F&F round

• Is the “Standard” for VC, and

most Angels

• Round >$1M?

18

confidential

Valuation

Regular Business: Based on earnings/ cash flow.

• Valuation = 3x – 10x company earnings (EBITDA, etc.)

• Valuation = 0.5x – 1x company revenues

Tech Start-ups:

• 10-25x? Earnings…but no current earnings

• 10x – 100x ?? Revenues? …but no/low revenues

• User multiples? (Usually crazy)

Most (experienced) Investors use “Comparables”

• Valuation based on other recent “market” prices: valuation of similar companies, deals

• Investors (especially active ones) see:

- See 3-5 priced deals for every one invested (100’s of pitches for every one invested)

- See/hear about 5-10x more deals

Reality Check:

• Company only worth what someone is willing to pay.

• Supply and Demand:

- Company completely unique (limited supply) + Many interested “buyer/investors”

(lots of demand) = Higher Price

- Many “similar” companies (lots of Supply) + One/No interested “buyers/investors”

(limited demand) = Lower Price (or “no” price)

• Perception vs. Reality: It all comes down to perception, and belief (very few objective

facts, numbers)

• It’s a Negotiation. Sales skills matter.

19

confidential

Notable Opinions

Paul Graham (Y-Combinator): “All financings for companies coming

our to YC are Convertible Notes” (2010/2011)

•Easy, founder friendly, and now the standard

• Its all about the “optionality”: if its worth $ Billions, valuation

unimportant

Fred Wilson (Union Square Ventures). Doesn’t like Notes. “Won’t

do them for my investments.”

•Conflict of interest, “need to know the price of what I am buying”, cost

of preferred is declining

Chris Dixon (Founder Collective). Likes Notes, but will never to un-

capped notes.

• Investing in founders; no amount of legal will help if you chose

wrong;

•Reputation: if you screw someone then no one will do business with

you.

20

confidential

21

Key Success Factors and Advice….continued

Valuation (and Key Terms). Be realistic. Be Flexible. Realize this is a

professional (not personal) discussion ; there will be back and forth. Ultimately

the “market” sets the price/terms.

• There is more to investment terms than valuation….Important to understand.

Timing. Am I ready for Angel Investment?......A few probing questions:

• Have you covered the key success factors mentioned here? Do you have a

compiling business opportunity with huge growth potential?

• Do you really need the money? Now? The more that you can accomplish on

your own, the more compelling your case (and valuation) will be…..

• Are you ready to work for a someone else? e.g. the investors, the board of

directors

• Fund raising is “brain damage”. It wastes valuable time that could be spent

growing the business. Avoid it, minimize it, delay it if you can.

confidential

22

Thanks! Thomas Wisniewski

Contact Info

Email: thomas@rosepaul.com

LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/thomaswis

Twitter: @thomaswis

This presentation: http://www.slideshare.net/Thomaswis/

New York Angels www.newyorkangels.com

New York Angels Educational Meetup: http://www.meetup.com/NY-Angels/

confidential

Summary Investor Perspective: Notes vs. Equity

History. Preferred Equity is standard for both Angel/Seed and VC (Series A, B, etc.).

Convertible Notes were used as a “bridge” to a [reasonably well defined, high probability]

upcoming financing.

• Now: Convertible Debt much more popular at Angel/Seed round

Preferred Equity. Equity (stock) that has defined “preferences” over common stock.

• Establishes a value for the company e.g. [$3.5M] pre-money valuation

• Liquidation Preferences. Most commonly used is “non-participating preferred” aka

“straight preferred”. E.g. a [1x] liquidation preference. Means investors get their invested

money back plus [1x] before common equity holders. In the event of success, everyone

converts to common and shares pari passu. Liquidation preference is really downside

protection for investors

• Investor rights. E.g. approval of key company decisions

Convertible Note. Debt that converts to equity when a next financing round occurs. As

Debt, typically: carries interest rate (e.g. 8%); has preference to all equity: gets paid back

1st; secured by assets of company

• Converts to equity at “same terms” as next round…..except the Note usually has

- Discount [10-30%] to the valuation (in the next round)

- Cap on valuation (in the next round); means “valuation not to exceed $__”.

• Terms of conversion

- Upon “qualified financing”, e.g. financing of a least [$2M]

- End of the Note’s term [18 months]

- At the option of investors

Other Key Terms. Employee option pool, board composition, dividends, anti-dilution

provisions, pro-rata investment rights, capped legal expenses.

23

Source: NY Angels Educational Meetup

confidential

New York Angels Process: A Monthly Cycle1. Proposals Reviewed Online (via Gust): 50 – 100 monthly

• Sources:

• NYA website/Gust (“cold call”: low prob of quality, and success)

• Syndicated deal from other group/investor (warm intro: better quality, better

success)

• Referral from NYA member (warmer intro: even better quality/success)

2. In Person NYA Screening: ~15 companies monthly

• Around 15 of the 100 are selected to present at an in person pitch/screening session

(1st Wed of the month)

• Companies have 10 min to pitch, 5 Q&A (5 minute investor discussion)

• Usually ~40 NYA members attend

3. Discovery / Follow-up: 1-3 new companies enter monthly (3-6 in-process total)

• Of the 15, 1-3 companies garner enough investor interest to move forward in some

fashion

• If there is sufficient interest from a core group of investors, and an investor willing to

“lead”, then the core NYA process moves forward with follow-up “Discovery”

meeting(s) aka deep dives, due diligence.

• In some cases individual investors want to follow-up and explore the company

further independently

4. Investment Breakfast: 1-3? companies monthly

• Those Companies that get to the term-sheet stage with several committed NYA

investors, are brought back to present to the NYA Group at the Breakfast

• NYA Investment Breakfast meetings: 20 minute presentation + Q&A, 40-60 NYA

members attending

5. Final Due Diligence, Legal Docs, Closing.

top related