mcknight road corridor study - home | city of ladue...1. define appropriate functional class and let...

Post on 10-Aug-2020

0 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

McKnight Road Corridor Study

DesignAlternatives

October 30, 2019

PRESENTATION OVERVIEW

1. Welcome and Introductions

2. Purpose and Public Involvement

3. Current Conditions and Future Trends

4. Issues and Goals

5. Alternatives and Analysis

6. Next Steps

2. PURPOSE AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

• Study Area

• Purpose

• Stakeholders

• Public Involvement Process• Public Open House for Input 5/15/19• County Parks 8/23/19• Public Open House for Design Alternatives

10/30/19

3. CURRENT CONDITIONS AND FUTURE TRENDS

• Existing Conditions• Arterial Roadway• Access to Residential Neighborhoods

• Historical Perspectives

• Tilles Park Issues• Winter Wonderland

• Existing Operations• Peak Hour Congestion and Queuing

• Future Traffic Trends

4. ISSUES AND GOALS

• Primary Deficiencies and Likely Causes• Local Desires vs. Regional Network Realities• Traffic Flow Total Volumes• Safety• Convenience• Local Access

4. ISSUES AND GOALS (cont.)

• Goals for Improvement of McKnight Road Corridor1. Define appropriate functional class and let that guide decisions2. Volume reduction*3. Speed control4. Improve safety5. Truck control*6. Ease of access for residents7. Convenience of access for residents8. Accommodate bikes and pedestrians safely9. Maintain emergency access10.Comply with existing Winter Wonderland court order11.Secure Neighborhoods*

5. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS

• Identified Potential Alternatives

• Extremes – Road Closure or Widen to Five-Lanes

• Remove STOP sign for EB right-turn at off-ramp, not MUTCD compliant

• Remove STOP sign for NB McKnight at York (with alternative only)

• Signal Alternatives to Collect North Area Traffic, Restrict Other Connections

• Lindworth/York North – close to ramps• Ellsworth/York South – offset

5. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS (cont.)

• Identified Potential Alternatives

• Remark NB Approach for Two Lanes – South Ramps to Lindworth/York North

• Widen to Extend Two SB Lanes from Litzsinger North of Park Entrance

• Sign and Mark Interchange “Local Truck Traffic Only” (MoDOT/RH)

• Upgrade Sonora Crossing to Full ADA Compatibility

• Two Key Improvements and Three Alternatives Identified

Two Key Improvements

All Scenarios: Restripe for Two Northbound Through Lanes Between York North/Lindworth and Eastbound 64 Ramp

All Scenarios: Widen Pavement to Extend Second Southbound Through Lane at Litzsinger

Three Design Alternatives Identified

TillesPark

Concept 1: Signalize York North/Lindworth

Concept 2: Signalize Ellsworth/York South

Concept 3: Signalize Ellsworth/York South – 2 Southbound Through Lanes from I-64 to Litzsinger

5. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS (cont.)

• Other Solutions Considered

• Analysis• Delays, Congestion and Queuing• Downstream Gaps – Platoons vs. Metered• Bikes - Existing Shoulders, GBP calls for “Climbing Lane” Config• Winter Wonderland Accommodations

• Improve Real Time Monitoring and Info Distribution – MODOT TMC, DMS boards, etc.

• Resident Access and Convenience• Maintain Sonora Crossing – Active Beacons

• Pros and Cons Ratings - Matrix

6. NEXT STEPS

• Select Preferred Alternative

• Alternative Refinement

• Written Report and Finalization_________________________________

• Cities Adopt or Reject Plan of Action

• Investigate Funding Opportunities

6. Break-Out Groups

• View the Boards

• Dot-Voting

• Fill-Out Comment Cards – Tonight or Take Home

top related