kathmandu university high school

Kathmandu University High School

Founded in 1998, Kathmandu University High School is initiated by Kathmandu University. Located in the beautiful out hills of Dhulikhel it has a very enchanting scenes of the mountains. With the total of 550 students , each class has 30 students in primary section and 60 students in secondary section. It also has A -level comprising of 100 students. Apart from education our school also has hostel facilities for the students.

Circle Members Chandan Thakur (CAPTAIN) Naman Koju Pratik Sapkota Rojan Bajgain Amrit Acharya Umang Raj Shrestha

Brainstorming for Group Name

Avengers Unity

Static Reality

Rangers Path Finders

Super Solvers

The Giant

The Reality QC

Finalized group name After the brainstorming for our group name, the conclusion was ” The

Reality QC ”. The reason to choose it as our group name are:

The word was based on reality of world.

Problems prevailing in our environment can be listed in this

name.

Through it we can provide real solutions to problems.

Circle Info: Group Name: The Reality QC Constituted on: 3rd Sept 2011 Average Age: 14yrs Working Days: Wednesday and Thursday Meet-Up Time: 2:40 to 3:40 PM Co- ordinators: Mr. Narad Rijal and Mr. Umesh Timalsina

Important DatesDate Venue Time Work3rd Sept 2011 KUHS 2:40 Circle formation16th – 18th Sept 2011 KUHS 2:40 Brainstorming session

26th Nov-4th Dec 2011 KUHS 2:40 Observation and analysis

11th-15th Dec 2011 KUHS 2:40 Planning strategies and implementing it

15th – 23rd Dec 2011 KUHS 2:40 Observation of implemented strategies

2nd Feb – 28th Feb 2012

KUHS 2:40 Discussing on the benefits of the projects

25th April- 19th May 2012

KUHS 2:40 Editing

Brainstorming I For Problem Identification

Lack of Computer Appliances (Gadgets) Lack of Hostel Facilities Lack of Classroom Displays Overuse of Cosmetics Lack of Projector Slow Internet Bullying Groupism Lack of Furniture Noisy Assembly Less Books in Library Wastage of Food

Improper Uniform Unqualified Teachers Less Musical Instruments Poor English Lack of Punctuality Lack of Educational Tours Wastage of Paper Stress of Homework Lack of Practical Knowledge Unqualified Cooks Lack of Eco-Friendly Environment Lack of Care

Stratification of ProblemsA B CLack of classroom displayNoisy assemblyWastage of paperWastage of foodLack of eco-friendly environment

Overuse of cosmetics BullyingGroupismPoor EnglishImproper uniformLack of punctualityStress of homeworkLack of care

Lack of computer appliances

Lack of hostel facilities

Lack of projector Slow internet Less books in

library Lack of

educational tours Less musical

instruments Lack of practical

knowledge Lack of furniture

A- Students can solve themselves.

B- Students can solve with an external help.

C- Students cannot solve at all.

Finalized Problems for Brainstorming II• Wastage of Food• Misuse of Paper• Lack of Classroom Displays• Violation of School Rules• Misuse of First-Aid Room• Disobeying Teachers• Bunking• Overuse of Deodorants• Lack of respect to Volunteers• Polluted Classroom Environment

Study Group for Problem Selection• Class 4 and 5 (30 Students each)• Class 6-10 (60 Students each)• Total- 360 Students

• KATHMANDU UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL

Problem PrioritizationProblem A B C D E F G H I J

Class 4 7 4 2 3 3 7 6 3 6 7Class 5 6 7 4 6 2 5 8 2 4 5Class 6 4 6 7 6 7 8 7 5 8 6Class 7 8 4 3 5 5 4 5 4 7 7Class 8 9 3 5 5 6 5 6 3 5 6Class 9 7 5 7 7 4 3 8 5 2 4Class 10 4 3 6 6 4 4 2 2 5 6

Total 45 32 34 38 31 33 42 24 38 41

A- Wastage of Food F- Disobeying TeachersB- Misuse of Paper G- BunkingC- Lack of Classroom Displays H- Overuse of DeodorantsD- Violation of School rules I- Lack of respect to volunteers E- Misuse of First-Aid Room J- Polluted Classroom Environment

Pareto MatrixProblem no. Total

FrequencyCumulative Frequency

Total Frequency %

Cumulative Frequency %

Problem 1 45 45 22.05 % 22.05 %

Problem 2 42 87 20.59 % 42.64 %

Problem 3 41 128 20.10 % 62.74 %

Problem 4 38 166 18.63 % 81.37 %

Problem 5 38 204 18.63 % 100.00 %

1- Wastage of Food 2- Bunking3- Polluted Classroom Environment 4- Violation of School rules 5- Lack of respect to volunteers

Problem Pareto Diagram

TOTAL

MARKS

CUMULATIVE

PERCENT

PROBLEM 1 PROBLEM 2 PROBLEM 3 PROBLEM 4 PROBLEM 5

Selected Problem

Wastage of Food

Wastage Of Food• Despite the providence, many people of the world have to satisfy

their hunger with just a crumb of bread to eat whole day while we the students of KUHS are misusing our opportunity and wasting food.

• We should know about the importance of food and also know the harmful disease we might get if we do not get proper diet.

• We the students who are the future and the pillars of our nation must know the consequences of wasting food and the problems we might face in future, we also must make others aware about wasting food to make better future.

Causes Of Problem Negligence Lack of Strict Rules Over Freedom Taking Food beyond need Unhygienic Utensils Lack of Tasty Food Arrogant Cooks Excessiveness of Food Lack of Food Management Serving Stale Food Disobedience Bad Company

Lack of Awareness Daily Habit of Throwing

Food Lack of Discipline Lack of Consciousness Lack of Guidance Spicy Food Food Fighting Habit of

Students

Stratification of CausesA B C Negligence More Food and Fun Taking Food beyond need Disobedience Daily Habit of Throwing food Lack of Discipline Lack of Consciousness Spicy Food Throwing Vegetables Unnecessarily Polluting environment by throwing food in public area

Lack of Strict RulesUnhygienic UtensilsLack of Tasty FoodArrogant CooksServing Stale FoodUnhygienic Environment in Dinning HallCompulsion

Over FreedomUnqualified CooksExcessiveness of FoodLack of Food ManagementMore amount of water in MilkLack of Food based KnowledgeLack of AwarenessLack of GuidanceLack of Pre-PlansGas Shortage

A- Students can solve themselves.

B- Students can solve with an external help.

C- Students cannot solve at all.

Ishikawa Diagram

Wastage of Food

Man

EnvironmentMaterial

Method

Negligence

Taking food beyond need Excessiveness of food

Daily habit of throwing food

Food fighting habit of students

Lack of food management

Lack of guidance

Lack of pre-plans

Lack of food

based knowledg

e

Serving stale food

Gas shortage

Spicy food

Dirty utensils

More amount of water in

milkOver freedom

Throwing vegetables unnecessarily

Why-Why AnalysisS.N

Causes Chance Cause Assignable Cause

Validity Yes No

1 Serving stale food √ √

2 Lack of guidance √ √

3 Lack of food based knowledge √ √

4 Lack of pre-plans √ √

5 Gas Shortage √ √

6 More amount of water in milk √ √

7 Spicy food √ √

8 Dirty utensils √ √

9 Taking food beyond need √ √

10 Negligence √ √

Cause Pareto MatrixCauses Total

FrequencyCumulative Frequency

Total Frequency %

Cumulative Frequency %

Taking Food beyond need

66 66 24.90 % 24.90 %

Unhygienic Utensils

60 126 22.64 % 47.54 %

Daily Habit of Throwing Food

52 178 19.62 % 67.96 %

Food Fighting Habit of Students

44 222 16.60 % 83.76 %

Throwing Vegetables unnecessarily

43 265 16.24 % 100.00 %

Cause Pareto Diagram

Problem 1 Problem 2 Problem 3 Problem 4 Problem 5

66 60 5244 43

TOTAL

MARKS

CUMULATIVE

PERCENT

ObservationDays Wastage of

VegetablesWastage of Bitten Rice

Wastage of Spinach

Wastage of Pasta

Monday Nil

Tuesday Nil

Wednesday Nil Nil

Thursday Nil Nil

Friday Nil Nil

Initial

Survey Questions• Do you think that our School provides Quality Food?• Do you think our school students Waste Food?• Do you think our school’s food is Spicy?• Are you aware of Wastage of Food?• What is the value of Food in your opinion?• ---------------------------------------------------• In your Opinion which is the most Wasted Food in our School?• ----------------------------------------------------• Do you think our Survey will make any change?

Survey ResultsS.N Question Yes No

1 Do you think that our school provides quality food?

82.82% 17.18%

2 Do you think that our school students waste food?

36.71% 63.29%

3 Do you think that our school food is spicy? 71.10% 28.90%

4 Are you aware of wastage of food? 67.18% 32.82%

5 Do you think our survey will make any change?

59.25% 40.75%

Data Collection :

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 40

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

YesNo

Do you think that our School provides Quality Food?

YesNo

17%

83%

Do you think that our school students waste food?

YesNo64%

36%

Do you think that our school food is spicy?

YesNo

28%

72%

Are you aware of wastage of food?

YesNo

68%

32%

68%

Problem Analysis• After our surveys and observation we were surprised by the wastage of food done by the students.

• Students were wasting food as if it has no importance.

• They were not much aware about the crisis of food in the world and wasting food as their wish.

Solution• Volunteers for the lunch and snacks time.• Awareness of importance of food.• Strict rules.• Proper guidance.• Not making spicy and oily food.• Not serving food which students don’t like.• Proper washing of food and vegetable.

5W’s 1hWhat

• Making students aware of not wasting food with strict monitoring and proper guidance.

When• During Breakfast, Lunch, Snacks and Dinner.

Where• In Dinning Hall and Hostel.

Whom • Class 6, 7, 8, 9 & 10

Why

• To create awareness among students. • To reduce “Wastage of Food”

How• By Keeping Volunteers.

Implementation

We conducted awareness program among students.

We implemented rules made by school.

We encouraged the students to follow the rules.

We showed documentary to the student regarding importance of food.

Implementation II

Observation

Days Wastage of Vegetables

Wastage of Bitten Rice

Wastage of Spinach

Wastage of Pasta

Monday Nil

Tuesday Nil

Wednesday Nil Nil

Thursday Nil Nil

Friday Nil Nil

Final

Comparison (Before & After)

Before After Students were not aware about the

importance of food. Students were conscious about

the importance of food.

Huge amount of vegetables were wasted.

Less amount of vegetables were wasted.

Strict rules related to wastage of food were not implemented.

Strict rules were made.

Before our case study, the cooks were arrogant.

After our case study, the cooks became less arrogant.

Comparison (Before & After)Days Before AfterMonday 55.94% 44.06%

Tuesday 60.38% 39.62%

Wednesday 60.00% 40.00%

Thursday 56.25% 43.75%

Friday 65.51% 34.49%

Gains: Tangible and Intangible Tangible

Fresh environment

Wastage of food was not seen much

The environment of the dining hall was more hygienic than usual.

Intangible

School saved a lot of moneyStudents got concerned about the

importance of food

While implementing our plans for wastage of food, we saw many positive changes which proved detrimental to our school. They are as follows:

Conclusion After our case study we have got in a conclusion that we

have been able to make the students aware about the consequences about wastage of food.

We have made students aware about the wastage of food. We have also given the trainings.

This has all been possible by the implementation of the case study.

ANY QUERIES ?