ifpri - naip pme in icar - survey results and workshop recommendation - mryuthunjaya

Post on 06-May-2015

227 Views

Category:

Education

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

National Agricultural Innovation Project (NAIP), ICAR and the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) organized a two day workshop on ‘Impact of capacity building programs under NAIP’ on June 6-7, 2014 at AP Shinde Auditorium, NASC Complex, Pusa, New Delhi. The main purpose of the workshop was to present and discuss the findings of the impact evaluation study on capacity building programs under NAIP by IFPRI. The scientists from ICAR and agricultural universities were sent abroad to receive training in specialized research techniques. Post-training, scientists were expected to work on collaborative projects within the ICAR, which would further enrich their knowledge and skills, expand their research network and stimulate them’ to improve their productivity, creativity and quality of their research. The ICAR commissioned with IFPRI (International Food Policy Research Institute) to undertake an evaluation of these capacity building programs under NAIP in July 2012. The workshop shared the findings on the impact of capacity building programs under NAIP and evolve strategies for future capacity building programs

TRANSCRIPT

PME in ICAR

Status, Survey Results

& Recommendations of the Workshop Held

on 27 May 2014, New Delhi

6 June 2014NASC Complex, New Delhi

Mruthyunjaya

IFPRI, NEW DELHI

Outline

• PME Initiatives in ICAR

• PME Survey Results

– General Observation

– Composition and functional Status

– Constraints

• Workshop Recommendations

– Institutionalization

– Research Priority Setting

– Functional Excellence

2

PME Initiatives in ICAR

• Formal/Informal monitoring efforts existed earlier (RCMU/ Technical Cell/PMC Section/RPC Cell, etc.)

• 1998: O&M Task Force and PME Task Force; NATP-32PME Cells

• 2006: NAIP-14 PME Cells

• 2010:S.L.Mehta Committee

• 2011: ICAR Order on constitution of PME Cells in all institutions to integrate and mainstream

3

PME Organogram

Priority Setting

Project allocation

Project Monitoring/

Evaluation

Technology Validation /

Impact Assessment

Capacity Creation

Information Management

PME Cell

Functions

PMC

Director

PMC

Act on Priorities as recommended by PME

Allocate priority projects to Scientists

Constitute committee of 2 experts (internal +

external) , and report to PME – annual

Plan for Capacity Creation – annual

Validating/ vetting Information – six monthly

Constitute committee of 2 experts (internal +

external) , and submit report to PME – annual

Coordinate / synthesise QRT, IRC, RAC and Vision

Docs & recommend Priority list to Director

Recommendation to Director – annual

Coordinate with 2 experts (internal + external) -

annual

Coordinate with 2 experts (internal + external) -

annual

Execute Capacity Building Programme

Information Management and Dissemination

4

PME

Survey Results

5

General Observation

• PME Cells exist and PME is practiced in all, but professional and analytical back-up weak

6

Staff Strength

7

Average Work-time Spent By PME Staff

60%13%

27%

Biological

Scientists

Social Scientists

Support Staff

Small Institutes3-4

Large Institutes5-11

25%

75%

Scientists Support Staff

PME Functions

8

Mandated• Research Prioritization / Project Allocation• Project Monitoring and Evaluation• Impact Assessment / Technology Validation• Capacity Creation• Information Management

Other Tasks

• Reports • Secretarial Work• General Maintenance• Web-hosting• Seminar/workshops/meetings• MoUs, ISO certification, RTI, Fellowships

9

Key PME Functions, Less Priority

Note: Figures indicate percentage of institutions performing these PME functions

90%

58% 58% 56%46% 44%

14%

Oth

er w

ork

s

CB

P

Info

Mgt

M&

E

Pro

ject

Allo

cati

on

Pri

ori

ty S

ett

ing

Imp

act

Ass

ess

me

nt

Constraints Identified

10

AdministrativeSkill

Statutory Recognition

Manual

Dedicated Staff

Wtg. In Assessments

Mainstreaming

Hierarchy / Role

Directors’ Interest

Trained Staff

Training

Financial

Earmarked and adequate

budget

Coordination

Intra-Institute &

ICAR HQ

Facilities

State of Art Facilities / IT

set-up

11

Note: Figures indicate percentage of institutions indicating constraints

72% 72%

56%44%

38%

Ad

min

Skill

Faci

litie

s

Co

ord

inat

ion

Fin

ance

Admin and Capacity Major Constraints

Workshop Recommendations

Held on 27 May 2014

12

Institutionalization

Change of Mind-set

Be Clear;PME is at the

Core

Integration &

Mainstream

Status&

Incentives

Reach Out

Research Priority Setting

National Priorities Farmers’ Needs

Functional Excellence

Coordination- Policy

Division at ICAR – HQ

Develop Manual

and 24x7 Helpline

Develop Indicators for

M&E and

Impact Assessment

Harmony and Help

Ingredients for Functional Excellence

Trained Staff Capacity Creation

Budget and Financial Powers

Using PME for Decision making

Thank You

top related