gendered impact of rubber plantation in lashio district
Post on 31-Oct-2021
2 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
z
Gendered Impact of Rubber Plantation in Lashio
District, Northern Shan State, Myanmar
2018
1
Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... i
1. Background of the Study .................................................................................................................... 1
2. Objectives of Study ............................................................................................................................. 2
3. Data Collection Method ...................................................................................................................... 2
3.1 Primary Data Collection ............................................................................................................. 2
3.2 Secondary Data Collection ......................................................................................................... 4
4 Profile of Villages ................................................................................................................................ 6
4.1 Villages along large-scale rubber plantations created by economic concessions .................. 6
4.2 Village along rubber plantations developed by local farmers................................................. 7
5 Key Findings ...................................................................................................................................... 10
5.1 Changing Livelihoods and Implications for Gender Roles ................................................... 10
5.2 Impacts of Changing Livelihoods on Gender Relations ........................................................ 11
6 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................... 12
7 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................. 13
7.1 Recommendations for Policy Makers...................................................................................... 13
7.2 Recommendation for Development Initiatives ....................................................................... 13
7.3 Recommendation for Future Researchers .............................................................................. 13
Annex ......................................................................................................................................................... 14
i
Abstract
Good land governance is critical to the sustainable development of Myanmar because its economy
is agriculture-dependent. Owing to the former government’s export-oriented mechanism, the
Myanmar government implement the industrial agricultural export goals of its 30-year master plan
(2000-01 to 2030-31). Moreover, it aims to have 145,000 hectares under rubber plantations in the
Shan State by 2031 with the global demand for rubber. Therefore, Northern Shan State has seen a
boom in rubber plantations since 2005.
This study explored the gender impacts of mushrooming rubber plantations by comparing changes
in: (1) an area where a company has established rubber by usurping upland plots from subsistence
farmers and (2) an area where local farmers grow rubber themselves. It used qualitative and
quantitative research methods.
In general, the proliferation of rubber plantations has diversified income sources resulting in
increased household cash income in both areas. However, many local people now eat less, because
they have lost access to forest resources and upland plots. They now rely more on cash crops,
which require considerable investments. Farmers use wage labor and migration as a coping
strategy. More men than women (nearly twice the number of women) are migrating, leading to
labor shortage in households and increased de-facto female-headed households. More women are
taking up daily wage jobs near their villages and have to bear an increased burden, managing both
productive and reproductive activities. However, they are also now more visible in decision-
making although less visible than men because cultural practices still dictate authority within
households. Women are also unhappier because of the diminished access to food, loss of land, and
greater workload following the increase in rubber plantations.
Keywords: Rubber plantation, Livelihood change, Migration, Wage labor, Women, Productive
activities, Reproductive activities, Household decision making, Unhappier
1
1. Background of the Study In Myanmar, one of the members of Greater Mekong Sub-Region (GMS), cross-border
investments in resource extraction opened up due to the partial liberalization of foreign investment
and trade laws from the late 1980s. One report estimated US$36 billion of Foreign Direct
Investment (FDI) from 1988 to 2010, and FDI of almost US$20 billion in 2011. Of this, US$10.2
billion went to the oil and gas sector, US$8.2 billion to the energy sector, and US$1.4 billion to
the mining sector [Central Statistical Organization (CSO), 2012]. The main regional investors in
Myanmar are China and Thailand, accounting for over half the investment, followed by South
Korea and Hong Kong (ibid). The governments of lower Mekong countries are interested in
attracting investments mostly in agricultural sectors. Therefore, cross-border agricultural
investment in the Mekong basin has been increased under the Greater Mekong Sub-Region
Economic Cooperation Program since the 1990s.
The Myanmar government too has shifted to export-oriented mechanisms and established the
Myanmar Industry Crop Development Enterprise (MICDE) to achieve industrial agricultural
export goals of its 30-year master plan (2000-01 to 2030-31). The main aim of this enterprise is to
convert 10 million acres of wasteland, not formally owned by farmers but used by local people in
upland areas for shifting cultivation, into industrial plantations by growing agricultural crops like
rubber, oil palm, rice, pulses, and sugarcane. Of 10 million acres of such land, the government
aims to plant rubber in 1.5 million acres [Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation (MOAI)].
Accordingly, the government issued two land laws in 2012: Farmland Law and the Vacant, Fallow
and Virgin Lands Management Law.
The government has promoted large-scale industrial agricultural production throughout the
country since the early 2000s. In 2006, the northern, eastern, and southern Kachin State and
northern and eastern Shan State saw a marked increase in rubber plantation concessions (Kevin
Woods, 2012). Consequently, the major livelihood of the rural farmer, the swidden fields (shifting
cultivation), are being threatened by large-scale, industrial rubber concessions (ibid). A driver of
the rubber expansion is China’s Opium Substitution Program implemented to facilitate Chinese
investments in northern Laos and Myanmar.
The Global Witness (2014) claims that the mushrooming of large-scale agricultural plantations
can have negative effects on local people, including landlessness and increased threats to land
tenure, forests, and ecosystems. Large-scale agricultural plantations are taking over hilly upland
areas, reducing smallholders’ access to land and natural resources, threatening their livelihoods
and causing food insecurity and increased poverty and deforestation. When a gender lens is applied
to these consequences, women are revealed as more vulnerable than men because of their
reproductive roles (SIWI, 2012). Women spend considerable time on livelihood tasks like
collecting water, firewood, other forest products, and other livelihood activities since they are now
forced to travel long distances to access natural resources.
2
2. Objectives of Study
The overall objective of the study is:
To explore the changes in gender roles and relations arising from livelihood changes after
the introduction of rubber plantations.
This objective can be sub-divided as:
To identify changes in livelihoods after the introduction of rubber plantations, among those
who plant rubber themselves and those who have lost lands to economic concessions for
rubber plantations;
To assess the effects of livelihood changes on gender roles within households; and
To analyze how changes in livelihood and in gender roles influenced gender relations in
households.
3. Data Collection Method
3.1 Primary Data Collection
The research methodology was designed to collect primary data from households. Key informant
interviews, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions were conducted to reflect different
perceptions on changes in livelihood conditions before, during, and after the introduction of rubber
plantations and its effects on local people from the perspective of gender analysis.
3.1.1 Household Survey
A household survey was conducted using a semi-structured questionnaire made up of open- and
closed-ended questions to obtain background information on the household, their main livelihood
and income sources, access to and control over NTFPs, social networking, and gender relations
before and after the introduction of rubber plantations.
As per the sample-size formula, 229 respondents from four villages needed to be chosen. However,
only 228 respondents (both men and women) were selected: 26 from Naung-Mo, 22 from Kaung-
Lin, 42 from Man Pein, 40 from Maing Par and 98 from Ho-Le. To select respondents for
interviews, random sampling was used by following the main road of the village. Moreover, male
and female respondents (123 males and 105 females) were alternatively chosen to get an equal
number because different groups have varied experiences and men and women have different
struggles due to rubber concessions. Some households had no women to participate in this study
for various reasons. So, the total number of male respondents is a little higher than that of women.
Sample Size
Parel’s sample size formula is used to calculate the sample size of each village:
n = N Z² P (1-P)/ (N d² + Z² P (1-P)) (Parel et al., 1973)
In which,
3
n = sample size N = total number of households
Z = Standard error (at 95% confidence level, Z=1.96)
P = estimated proportion of the population (P= 0.5)
d = error limit (5%)
Using this formula, sample households for each village are shown in the following table.
Table 1. Sample Size of Each Village
Selected
Village
Total households Sample households
(formula)
Sampled households
Naung-Mo 28 26 26
Kaung-Lin 26 24 22
Man Pein 43 39 42
Maing Par 42 38 40
Ho Le 140 102 98
These villages have rubber plantations older than seven years invested in by companies and/or
small farmers. Villagers in Naung-Mo, Kaung-Lin, Man Pein and Maing Par villages lost the land
they cultivated and the land they used for firewood plantation, without any benefits. Therefore, the
study chose 26 respondents from Naung-Mo 22 from Kaung-Lin, 42 from Man Pein, and 40 from
Maing Par. From Ho-Le, the study chose 98 respondents to focus on the perspectives of farmers
who planted rubber on their own land.
3.1.2 In-Depth Interviews
To explore detailed information on changes in livelihood patterns, each member’s response to
those changes, and gender role changes in households before and after rubber plantation
introduction, in-depth interviews were conducted. At least two households in each village were
chosen by the snowball method and all members of selected households in an age range of 15 to
65 years were interviewed separately. The criteria for selecting households included (1) it must
not be a new household and (2) the couple must be able to shed light on the situation before and
after rubber plantations. Twenty-four respondents (12 women and 12 men) were interviewed from
12 households of five villages.
3.1.3 Focus Group Discussion
4
Specific working groups were organized taking into consideration gender and age. Equal numbers
of each category were inducted for diverse opinions to analyze the impact of rubber plantations on
villages, using tools like resource map and village histogram. Six-eight respondents were chosen
from each village.
3.1.4 Key Informant Interview
Village heads of all villages and government officials were interviewed to explore additional
information on the impact of rubber plantations on social (gender roles) and economic
(livelihoods) aspects in the study area and local attitudes.
Three government officers (one township agricultural officer, one district officer of the Settlement
and Land Record Department, and one township officer from the administrative office) and five
heads of five villages were contacted to arrange meetings for information about procedures, rules,
and regulations on establishing rubber plantations for private companies, protecting the rights of
the local community, developing infrastructure in the area, job opportunities, and the engagement
of local people in plantation work. The leader of each village provided information on the impact
of rubber plantations on the livelihoods and roles of women and men within households.
3.2 Secondary Data Collection
Secondary data was collected from relevant government websites, published articles, books,
reports, papers, journals, and other literature. Basic information about villages, like demographics
were obtained from the district administration office. From the Settlement and Land Record
Department, different types of land-utilization patterns were collected. The Department of
Agriculture (DOA) provided the statistical data on the total area of rubber and other crop
plantations.
5
Figure 1. Research Design
Research Problem
Research Objective
Research Design
Conceptual Framework
Selection of Study Area
Sampling Design
Literature Review
Research Question
Data Collection
Secondary Data
-Research Papers
-Published Articles
-Government Data
-Relevant Websites
Primary Data
-Household Survey
-Key Informant Interview
-Focus Group Discussion
-In-Depth Interview
Data Processing and Analysis
Results and Discussion
Conclusion and Recommendations
6
4 Profile of Villages
4.1 Villages along large-scale rubber plantations created by economic concessions
Among the villages studied, the socio-economic characteristics of Naung-Mo, Kaung-Lin, Man-
Pein, and Maing-Par are nearly the same. They each have large-scale rubber plantations nearby,
developed by companies and militia. These plantations are often established by taking upland areas
from local farmers without any compensation. Local farmers lose cultivatable land, grazing land,
and forest land when their main livelihood is agriculture. So, they are forced to change their
livelihoods. Gendered division of labor within households changed, resulting in changes in the
relations between men and women. This is because women take responsibility for financial
management within households. These four small villages were combined as one group for data
analysis. Hereafter, these villages will be named as Area 1 for clarity when comparing village
types.
4.1.1 Naung-Mo
Naung-Mo village is included in the Waine-Htain village tract on the Lashio-Maine-Yaw road.
This village has only Shan people with 28 households and a population of 165. It is divided into
lowland (44%), dryland (30%), housing (21%), religious and funeral (2%), and common (3%)
areas. The main livelihood is agriculture. The large-scale rubber plantation near the village is
cultivated by Sein-Wutt-Hmone Company. It covers 11,860 ha. The introduction of the plantation
resulted in loss of shifting cultivation area. The resulting difficulties forced the villages to come
up with various responses to survive. They had to develop new lowlands in a place far from their
village and change their cropping pattern to earn more cash. Most villagers changed their
livelihoods; 28% of the total population migrated to other countries like China and Thailand. Some
chose China due to high wages and lesser distance from their homes. Some chose Thailand because
of language similarities.
4.1.2 Kaung-Lin
This village is also located in Waine-Htain village tract on the road to Maine-Yaw. It has 26
households and a population of 94 belonging to the Shan ethnic group. The land-use pattern is
lowland (42%), dryland (25%), housing (25%), religious and funeral (4%), and common (4%)
areas. The main livelihood is agriculture but the village lost its shifting cultivation land after the
introduction of the large-scale rubber plantation (11,860 ha) which has investment from Sein-
Wutt-Hmone Company. Then, they had to develop new lowlands in another place far from the
village and change their cropping pattern to make more cash. Like in Naung-Mo, 31% of the total
population migrated to countries like China and Thailand. Women migrants outnumbered men.
Their choice of country was determined by similar reasons as in Naung-Mo.
4.1.3 Man Pein
7
Main-Piane is also on the road to Maine-Yaw. It has 43 households and a population of 201 Shan
ethnic people. Agriculture is the main livelihood. So, 30% of total land is lowland, 40% is dryland,
22% housing area, 2.7% religious and funeral area, and 6% common land. There are 667.75 ha of
rubber plantations with investments from various businessmen. Man-Pan militia owns 61%,
General Myint Hlaing 24%, Sein-Wutt-Hmone Company 3%, Ye-Kabar Company 3%, and three
Chinese/Shan ethnic businessmen own the remaining 9%. These businessmen initially grabbed
village land with the support of the military to cultivate Jatropha curcas (Kyat-su). Then, they
shifted to rubber. The villagers lost their upland area and had to develop a new lowland area in a
place far from their village and change their cropping pattern. As much as 35% of the total
population migrated to Thailand which offered the benefit of similar language.
4.1.4 Maing-Par
Maing-Par is included in the Man-Pein village tract on the road to Maine-Yaw. It has 42
households and a population, of Shan people, of 202. The main livelihood activity is agriculture.
Lowland area makes up 20%, dryland 42%, housing 13.33%, religious and funeral 8%, and
common land 16.67%. The large rubber plantations near the village have investments from various
businessmen. The Man-Pan militia has invested in 161.88 ha and Sein-Wutt-Hmone Company in
60.71 ha. As in Man- Pein, land was initially grabbed with military assistance to cultivate Kyat-
su. Then, it was used for rubber plantations. Villagers who lost their upland area had to develop
new lowland far from village and change their cropping pattern. Of the total population, 62%
migrated to other countries like Thailand because of similarity of language.
4.2 Village along rubber plantations developed by local farmers
4.2.1 Ho-Le
Ho-Le is a large village, nearly resembling a small town, close to the China border and on the road
to the border trade area. Therefore, most villager trade and their standard of living is better than
the other four villages. Half the village is covered by housing area, 15% is covered by religious
and funeral area, 10% by common land (market, school, and playground) and the remaining 25%
by cultivated lowland and dryland. It has 299 households and a population of 1,181.
Established over 100 years ago, this village, according to in-depth interviews, then had only three
Kachin households that cultivated paddy. Over time, more Kachin people moved from hilly areas
and began living here. So, the land surrounding the village was managed under Kachin customary
law. Kokang people migrated here and have now become the major ethnicity. Therefore, 81% of
the total population is Kokang (or Chinese migrants from Yunan), 16% is Kachin and 3% are
Burmese migrants from central Burma.
They cultivate rubber on all their owned land and bought land as well. On the other hand, all upland
area which was used for paddy are changed into plantation area. So, they had to develop new
upland far from the village and change their cropping pattern to make more cash. Moreover, all of
8
the grazing land area and other degraded forest area are also changed into rubber plantation.
Therefore, they did not bred cattle and change into small livestock breeding. Nearly 70% of the
population has migrated to China, Malaysia, and the United States of America. Kokang and some
Kachin chose China due to the high wages, greater job opportunities, and proximity to their village.
Some Kokang migrated internally to Pharkant to work in mining, and Kachin chose Malaysia as a
transit point on the journey to the United States. Livelihoods and gendered division of labor
changed, but gender relations remained unchanged. This is because the perception that men are
breadwinners remains strong in the minds of local people. In this study, this village will be referred
to as Area 2.
Table .2 General Information of Villages
Village Naung-
Mo
Kaung-Lin Man-Pein Maing-Par Ho-Le
Village Types Area 1 Area 2
Definition of area 1 & 2 Land Grabbing No Land
Grabbing
Village Tract Waine-Htain Man-Pein Ho-Le
Township Lashio Kun-Long
District Lashio
Number of HH 28 26 43 42 299
Population 165 94 201 202 1,181
Planting rubber Company, Businessman, Militia Local farmers
Social and cultural
practices
Patriarchal system Patriarchal
system
Main Livelihood Agriculture Agriculture,
Trade, Selling
Goods in
Market
9
Map 1 Location of study area in Northern Shan State
10
5 Key Findings
5.1 Changing Livelihoods and Implications for Gender Roles
Rubber plantations are mushrooming around Lashio District due to the 30-year master plan of the
former Myanmar Government which changed upland areas surrounding the villages near Lashio
to commercial rubber plantations. Companies, chiefly Chinese, took over land and local farmers
too took to growing rubber on their land. An analysis of two areas before and after rubber
plantations, using T-test, shows that average income in Area 1 increased from 277,252 MMK (579
USD) to 1,667,486 MMK (1,153 USD) whereas in Area 2, it increased from 791,896 MMK (1,616
USD) to 7,672,136 MMK (6,266 USD). Average cash income in both study areas increased
significantly after rubber plantations came up. A comparison of two areas shows that in study area
1, before the introduction of rubber, the main sources of income were sale of crops (84%) and
income from livestock (10%). After the introduction of rubber, 74% of household income came
from cash crops, while wage labor (12%), income from livestock (5%), non-farm income (4%),
and remittances (4%) made up the rest. Similarly, in study Area 2, before rubber plantations,
income came from non-farm sources (nearly 58%) including salary, trade, shops, cycle carrying,
hiring trucks; cash crops (39%); income from livestock (2%); and wage labor (1%). After the
introduction of rubber, income sources became cash crops (38%), remittances (29%), non-farm
sources (22%), wage labor (8%), and income from livestock (3%).
Statistical data shows that in both areas, the percentage of male involvement in agriculture was
greater than that of women. For each cash crop, the percentage of women working on planting,
weeding, and harvesting was higher than that of men. In livestock breeding, women and men had
different tasks. Due to the loss of grazing land, farmers in both areas shifted from cattle breeding
to small livestock breeding. In both areas, women’s involvement in breeding pigs and chicken
increased after the introduction of rubber; the percentage of women in total tasks is more than
80%.
In percentage terms, male migrants nearly doubled female migrants in Area 2, while they were six
times greater in Area 1. This has resulted in labor shortage in the area, causing more women to
enter into wage labor. Descriptive analysis shows that the percentage of male involvement in wage
labor in Area 1 decreased while the percentage of female engagement in wage labor doubled
because the migration rate of women in Area 2 is greater than in Area 1.
In both areas, productive and reproductive tasks mean that women are busier than men. Villagers
in Area 2 are busier than those in Area 1 because of the time consumed by rubber production.
However, more women in Area 1 feel unhappier than before because they are now busier, more so
than the women in Area 2. The availability of electricity means that in Area 2, women can save
time on reproductive tasks.
Although household income has increased in both areas, food intake has decreased. In Area 1, half
of both men and women respondents said that they have less food, whereas in Area 2, nearly 70%
11
of females and 90% of males said they get the same food. This is because the villagers in Area 2
used to buy food from the market even before rubber was introduced, whereas Area 1 depended
on non-timber forest products (NTFP), hunting, and upland rice production for domestic
consumption. This also added to women’s unhappiness because more of their time is spent
collecting NTFP.
Monoculture plantation has also had negative effects on the surrounding environment. Changes
have been seen in the quality of water, soil, and forests. In both areas, with grazing land and areas
yielding firewood being taken over by rubber plantations, access to forest products has decreased
and chemical contamination of streams and soil erosion has increased.
In both areas, income sources have changed and household incomes have increased. However,
living standards in the area where local farmers grow rubber themselves is higher than where
farmers have had to give land to rubber plantations. In both areas, women’s involvement in
productive activities is higher than before. While the increased income has made men happier,
women are unhappy because of the increased workload.
5.2 Impacts of Changing Livelihoods on Gender Relations
With the introduction of rubber plantations, farmers in Area 1 lost their lands, especially upland,
grazing land, and forest land. Farmers have not been compensated for the lands that were grabbed
from them. Initially, village leaders and villagers had tried to negotiate with companies for their
lands. At that time, the encouragement of women was crucial in negotiations. However, no
solutions were found. Land loss brought financial difficulties for farmers. Not only men but
women too had to leave homes for work as their land under cultivation diminished. However, this
gave women some role in household decision-making and responsibility for financial
management. In Area 2, decisions on all crops were mostly made by men and women’s
participation was low at less than l0%. In making decisions on sugarcane, the percentage of
women’s involvement was 25% of total because brokers came and bought sugarcane at home and
so women met and negotiated with them to sell sugarcane. However, this was only half that of
men. This is because of strong social and cultural practices in the area. Different experiences
affected the decisions made by men and women regarding the education of girls and boys. The
percentage of improvement in children’s education was not considerably different among girls and
boys in Area 1 but women could voice their opinions, giving girls and boys equal access to
education. However, in Area 2, the percentage of improvement in women’s education was
different from that of men because of the overwhelming perception that men were breadwinners.
In both areas, however, the number of educated women was still lower than those of men.
In both areas, cultural practices are determined by patriarchy and women are denied access to
property. However, with more women engaged in productive activities, their participation in
household decisions, on sale of crops and children’s education, has increased. Women’s
participation in household decision-making is still less visible than that of men. Women in Area 1
have greater participation in household decision-making than women in Area 2 because the former
12
have had to take responsibility for financial management after the introduction of rubber
plantations. Women in Area 2 are still dealing with a strong patriarchal system that retains the
perception that men are breadwinners.
6 Conclusion
With the previous government’s 30-year master plan, rubber plantations in Northern Shan State
have been increasing since 2005. Commercial rubber plantations took away farmers’ upland
subsistence farming areas. So, 76% of subsistence farmers lost the land on which they cultivated
rice, pineapple, and maize; they received no compensation in return. The expansion of rubber
plantations has also led to loss of forests and grazing land near villages, adding to the unhappiness
of villagers. Local farmers have had to change their cropping patterns and their livelihood
activities. They now grow more cash crops like corn and paddy. Generally, 60% of all crop
production tasks are performed by men. Where rubber plantations are run by local farmers, the
advent of Chinese businesses has also resulted in changes in cropping pattern for better returns on
investment. Their main crops are rubber, corn, sugarcane, and paddy.
The reliance on cash crops has made women unhappier than before because of the imbalance
between income and expenditure. The gendered division of labor in crop production means that
80% of all such work is done by men. Women’s participation in planting and harvesting each crop
has doubled since the introduction of rubber. In addition, farmers in both areas have shifted from
raising cattle to breeding small livestock since grazing lands have also been taken over. The smaller
livestock are cared for by women.
Migration is now used as a coping strategy. The percentage of male migrants is double that of
females, leading to labor shortage in farming activities. So, women fill the gap and their
engagement in wage labor increases, while that of men has decreased. In general, average
household income is higher than before, although half of the local people in Area 1 have lesser
access to food than before. This is because of reliance on forest products, access to which has been
curtailed. Women in Area 1 are unhappier than before since they are now required to spend more
time in NTFP collection. In both areas, a traditional patriarchal system prevails. However, in Area
1, the involvement of women in production work has allowed them to manage household income.
As a result, they have a greater say in decision-making within households, which has improved
education for girls. In Area 2, however, women are less visible in household decision-making
because of a stronger patriarchal system. In both areas, though, the participation of women in
household decision making is still less visible than that of men because of the influence of cultural
and social norms.
In both areas, women have entered the workforce to deal with the consequences of proliferating
rubber plantations. Women are busier with reproductive and productive work and are unhappier
than before. Women in Area 1 who reported being unhappier than before was double that in Area
2, owing to lesser access to food resulting from loss of land and inaccessibility of electricity to
reduce their workload.
Villagers in Area 2 have been able to manage their own land, so their living standard is better than
in Area 1 in terms of income, education, transportation, and access to electricity, etc. In both areas,
13
women’s participation in decision-making is more visible than before because of their engagement
in productive activities. However, this is still less than that of men because of socio-cultural norms.
Restricted access to food, greater productive and reproductive workload, and loss of land resulting
from rubber concessions means that women in both areas are unhappier than before.
7 Recommendations
7.1 Recommendations for Policy Makers
With the government’s export-oriented mechanism, commercial rubber plantations took over
upland areas, where local farmers undertook subsistence farming. This was facilitated by the
definition of vacant land in land laws (2012). This definition must be revised to avoid the loss of
subsistence farming land. Cultivated land should be developed and relocated to farmers so they
have enough land to make a living.
Villagers have lost forests near their villages owing to increased rubber plantations. Existing
forests should be conserved and/or a community forest or firewood plantation established to fulfill
local firewood needs. In addition, local people should be educated about the systematic utilization
of chemicals in farming, to avoid harmful effects. Agriculture specialists can share good
agricultural practices with local people, especially the use of local species to avoid extinction of
native species.
Distance is an obstacle that women face in accessing education. To improve women’s lives,
schools should be opened near villages and/or transportation provided to access education.
7.2 Recommendation for Development Initiatives
Women’s engagement in productive activities has increased but they remain less visible in
decision-making in households. Both men and women need to be educated to ensure women’s
voices are heard within the household. Moreover, women still lag men in community development
activities and participation in village meetings. Development projects should meet women’s basic
needs to attract their active participation in community activities. To reduce women’s workload,
development projects should focus on developing infrastructure like electricity that will help save
time on reproductive tasks and conserve forests by avoiding the use of firewood for daily use.
7.3 Recommendation for Future Researchers
This study only focuses on the gender impacts of rubber plantations mushrooming due to
government policies. It looked at concessions for rubber plantations and plantations developed by
local farmers. However, Myanmar has many more kinds of plantations in accordance with different
government policies. This study recommends investigating the impact of each type of plantation
using a gender lens.
This study explores coping strategies in two types of areas to respond to the effects of increasing
rubber plantations. It does not focus on the main effects of rubber prices. So, changes in livelihoods
within communities where local people have grown rubber for a long time must be investigated in
accordance with rubber price, but from a gender perspective. This study mainly targets the socio-
economic impacts of plantations on women and men. Therefore, it recommends assessing the
environmental impact of monoculture plantation on the daily life of men and women.
14
Annex Annex 1: Activities Photos
Figure (1) Rubber Plantation near Mine Par Village Figure (2) Sein Wutt Hmone Company’s Rubber plantation area
(4800 acres)
Figure (3) Household Interview Figure (4) Household Interview
15
Figure (5) Focus Group Discussion with Women Group Figure (6) Focus Group Discussion with Men Group
Figure (7) Key Informant Interview Figure (8) Residence for plantation workers
top related