a new planning paradigm for california: low vmt development governor’s office of planning and...

31
A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 2015 1

Upload: eugene-garrison

Post on 19-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

1

A New Planning Paradigm for California:Low VMT Development

Governor’s Office of Planning and ResearchNovember 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21)

December 2015

Page 2: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

2

Why should we care about VMT?

December 2015

Page 3: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

3December 2015

VMT Reduction Needed for GHG Reduction

Tailpipe ≈ 38% of state GHGsTotal Transportation >50% (fuel refining, road construction and maintenance, vehicle manufacture)

EO B-30-15: ↓ 40% by 2030EO S-S-05: ↓ 80% by 2050EO B-16-2012 ↓ 80% by 2050 for transportation sector

ARB: Assuming stretch goals on vehicle efficiency, fuel carbon content: 2030 Light duty VMT ↑ % (with population ↑ ~17%)

Substantial improvements in travel efficiency needed

Large fraction of CA is suburban, Even larger fraction of CA VMT is suburban Need VMT reduction statewide

Page 4: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

4

Impacts of High VMT Development

Environment

• Emissions• GHG• Regional pollutants

• Energy use• Transportation energy • Building energy

• Water • Water use• Runoff – flooding• Runoff – pollution

• Consumption of open space• Sensitive habitat• Agricultural land

Health

• Collisions• Physical activity• Emissions

• GHGs• Regional pollutants

• Mental health

Cost

• Increased costs to state and local government• Roads• Other infrastructure• Schools• Services

• Increased private transportation cost

• Increased building costs (due to parking costs)

• Reduced productivity per acre due to parking

• Housing supply/demand mismatch future blight

December 2015

Page 5: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

5

Image Credits- Urban Advantage, Roma Design Group, City of Dana Point

Picturing A Low VMT Future

December 2015

Page 6: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

6

Image Credits- Urban Advantage, Roma Design Group, City of Dana Point

Picturing A Low VMT Future

December 2015

Page 7: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

7

Image Credits- Urban Advantage, Roma Design Group, City of Dana Point

Picturing A Low VMT Future

December 2015

Page 8: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

8

How do we achieve a low-VMT future?

(and, how does SB 743 help?)

December 2015

Page 9: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

9

1. Build low-VMT development2. Build low-VMT transportation infrastructure3. Manage travel demand smartly4. Define success in a way that makes sense

December 2015

How do we achieve a low VMT future?

Page 10: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

10December 2015

1. Build Low-VMT Development

SB 743 facilitates land use development in low-VMT locations:

• Streamlines development in transit areas

• Streamlines development in centrally-located areas

• Streamlines VMT-reducing locally-serving retail

VMT metric enables us to see the big picture on transportation impact…

Page 11: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

11

Analysis of infill development using LOS

December 2015

Page 12: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

12

Analysis of infill development using LOS

Loads less vehicle travel onto the network

December 2015

Page 13: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

13

Analysis of infill development using LOS

Loads less vehicle travel onto the network

…but triggers numerous LOS impacts

December 2015

Page 14: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

14

Analysis of greenfield development using LOS

December 2015

Page 15: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

15

Analysis of greenfield development using LOS

Loads 3-4x the vehicle travel onto the network

December 2015

Page 16: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

16

Analysis of greenfield development using LOS

Loads 3-4x the vehicle travel onto the network

…but triggers few LOS impacts

Traffic generated by the project is disperse enough by the time it reaches congested areas that it doesn’t trigger LOS thresholds, even though it contributes broadly to regional congestion.

Page 17: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

17December 2015

2. Build Low-VMT transportation infrastructure

SB 743 facilitates investment in VMT-reducing transportation infrastructure:

• Streamlines transit projects

• Streamlines active transportation projects

• Helps decision-makers understand the implications of roadway expansion projects

Page 18: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

18

A

A

AA

A

A

December 2015

2. Build Low-VMT transportation infrastructure

Page 19: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

19

Added Capacity – Just accommodating the A’s…

A

A

AA

A

A

December 2015

2. Build Low-VMT transportation infrastructure

Page 20: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

20

B

B

BB

B

B

But what accommodates the A’s also accommodates the B’s…

A

A

AA

A

A

December 2015

2. Build Low-VMT transportation infrastructure

Page 21: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

21

B

B

BB

B

BA

A

AA

A

A

Traffic re-congests until it finds the equilibrium delay

But what accommodates the A’s also accommodates the B’s…

December 2015

2. Build Low-VMT transportation infrastructure

Page 22: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

22December 2015

2. Build Low-VMT transportation infrastructure

Roadway expansion reduces travel time, which leads to:

1. Longer trips (↑ VMT)2. Mode shift toward automobile (↑ VMT)3. Newly generated trips (↑ VMT)4. Route changes (can ↑ or ↓ or VMT)5. More disperse land use development (↑ VMT)

Predicted by basic microeconomic theory (supply and demand)…

…proven by research: +0.6 to 1.0% ↑ VMT per 1.0% ↑ in lane miles

Page 23: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

23June 2015

2. Build Low-VMT transportation infrastructure

Litman, T. (2014). "Generated Traffic and Induced Travel: Implications for Transport Planning." Victoria Transport Policy Institute.Duranton, G. and Turner, M. (2011). “The Fundamental Law of Road Congestion: Evidence from US Cities.” American Economic Review, 101: 2616-2652.Cervero, R. (2003). “Road Expansion, Urban Growth, and Induced Travel: A Path Analysis.” Journal of the American Planning Association, 29 (2): 145-163.Cervero, R. (2002). “Induced Travel Demand: Research Design, Empirical Evidence, and Normative Policies.” Journal of Planning Literature 17: 3-20.Noland, R., and Lem, L. (2002). "A Review of the Evidence for Induced Travel and Changes in Transportation and Environmental Policy in the US and the UK." Transportation Research Part D: Transportation and Environment 7, no. 1: 1-26.

Page 24: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

24June 2015

2. Build Low-VMT transportation infrastructure

Cervero, R. (2001). "Road Expansion, Urban Growth, and Induced Travel: A Path Analysis." Department of City and Regional Planning, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California Berkeley.Cervero, R, and Hansen, M (2001). "Road Supply-Demand Relationships, Sorting out Causal Linkages." University of California Transportation Center, Working Paper No. 444.Noland, R. (2001). "Relationships between Highway Capacity and Induced Vehicle Travel." Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 35, no. 1: 47-72.Rodier, C., Abraham, J., Johnston, R., and Hunt, D. (2001). "Anatomy of Induced Travel Using an Integrated Land Use and Transportation Model of the Sacramento Region.” National Research Council, Washington, D.C.Barr, L. (2000). "Testing Significance of Induced Highway Travel Demand in Metropolitan Areas." Transportation Research Record 1706: 1-8.

Page 25: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

25June 2015

2. Build Low-VMT transportation infrastructure

Chu, X. (2000). "Highway Capacity and Areawide Congestion." Preprint for the 79th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. National Research Council, Washington, D.C.Fulton, L., Noland, R., Meszler, D., and Thomas, J. (2000). "A Statistical Analysis of Induced Travel Effects in the U.S. Mid-Atlantic Region." Journal of Transportation and Statistics 3, no. 1: 1-14.Mokhtarian, P., Samaniego, F., Shumway, R., and Willits, N. (2000). "Revisiting the Notion of Induced Traffic through a Matched-Pairs Study." Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis and Department of Statistics and The Statistical Laboratory, University of California, Davis.Noland, R. and Cowart, W. (2000). "Analysis of Metropolitan Highway Capacity and the Growth in Vehicle Miles of Travel." Transportation 27, no. 4: 362-390.

Page 26: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

26June 2015

2. Build Low-VMT transportation infrastructure

Noland, R., and Lem, L. (2000). "Induced Travel: A Review of Recent Literature and the Implications for Transportation and Environmental Policy.” Presented at the European Transport Conference 2000.Strathman, J., Dueker, K., Sanchez, T., Zhang, J., and Riis, A. (2000). "Analysis of Induced Travel in the 1995 NPTS.” Center for Urban Studies, College of Urban and Public Affairs, Portland State University.Hansen, M. and Huang, Y. (1997). “Road Supply and Traffic in California Urban Areas.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 31, no. 3: 205-218.Coombe, D. (1996). "Induced traffic: what do transportation models tell us?" Transportation 23 no. 1, 83-101.Marshall, N. (1996). "Evidence of Inducted Demand in the Texas Transportation Institute's Urban Roadway Congestion Study Data Set." Resource Systems Group, Inc.

Page 27: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

27December 2015

2. Build Low-VMT transportation infrastructure

How do we know which transportation infrastructure investments are smart?

Page 28: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

28December 2015

3. Manage Travel Demand Smartly

Under SB 743, travel demand management will be mitigation for transportation impacts

• Unbundle parking• Provide active mode

facilities• Improve/reduce barriers to

transit use• Improve mixing of uses• Provide traffic calming • Implement pricing/tolling• …

Page 29: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

29December 2015

3. Manage Travel Demand Smartly

Page 30: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

4. Define success in a way that makes sense

Page 31: A New Planning Paradigm for California: Low VMT Development Governor’s Office of Planning and Research November 3, 2015 (Day 4, COP-21) December 20151

31

Thanks!

[email protected]

December 2015