a foucaldian discourse analysis of the ability of physiotherapy service users to participate in goal...

1
Physiotherapy December 2002/vol 88/no 12 766 Rhoda Allison Auckland University of Technology and South Devon Healthcare NHS Trust Introduction Rehabilitation is an area of healthcare where it is particularly important to develop a client-focused approach. This study examined the ways in which assessments were conducted and goals of treatment were agreed between physiotherapists and service users. A Foucaldian discourse analysis was chosen as the research method. This was primarily due to the critical potential of Foucalt’s approach, with particular reference to the role of power and knowledge in relationships between healthcare users and professionals. Method Detailed assessments between six service users and physiotherapists were observed and recorded. The data comprised transcripts of the assessments, and the text of publicised policies, guidelines and standards that were felt to impact on practice. The data also included the access to information for both parties before the assessment. A Foucaldian discourse analysis was used to identify the predominant discourses that were adopted by physiotherapists and service users in the assessments. These discourses were then analysed to identify the subject and power positions they offered for service users and physiotherapists, and the power strategies exercised during the assessments. This paper introduces Foucault’s concepts of discourse and power, and demonstrates discourse analysis of several extracts from the assessments. Findings Discourses of medicine and medicine-based practice tended to dominate the assessments. These discourses frequently positioned the physiotherapist in a role of more authority and the service user in a more passive role. Although discourses of empowerment and user involvement were present in the rhetoric of standards and policies, they were less apparent in clinical practice. Discussion Through discussion of the competing discourses occurring in these assessments, this paper explores some of the difficulties that physiotherapists face with attempts to develop empowering practices, alongside demands for evidence-based practice and some of the traditional constraints of service provision. It highlights the instances of empowering practices that did occur and considers how these can be developed. Sustained Maximal Inspiratory Manoeuvres Can Be Used to Predict Extubation Outcome after Prolonged Periods of Mechanical Ventilation CARDIO-RESPIRATORY CARE A Foucaldian Discourse Analysis of the Ability of Physiotherapy Service Users to Participate in Goal Setting PROFESSIONAL ISSUES A Bruton University of Southampton Introduction Maximal inspiratory pressure is an accepted effort-dependent measure of global inspiratory muscle strength. Although numerous studies have examined its ability to predict weaning/extubation outcome after mechanical ventilation, maximal inspiratory pressure has generally been found to have lower specificity than is clinically acceptable. The Respiratory Trainer (RT2) is a new device originally conceived as a methodology for training the inspiratory muscles. It generates three measures of inspiratory muscle function including a new measure called sustained maximal inspiratory pressure. This is calculated as the area under the curve produced by sampling maximal inspiratory pressure at 16 Hz during a sustained inspiratory manoeuvre. Method Twenty-seven intubated adults who had required prolonged mechanical ventilation (48 hours or more) and were deemed ready for extubation were measured using the RT2 before extubation. Differences in sustained maximal inspiratory pressure measures between extubation success and failure outcome groups were then sought using independent samples t-tests. The sensitivity and specificity of using different levels of sustained maximal inspiratory pressure measures to predict outcome were also calculated using receiver operating charactistic curves. Results Significant differences in sustained maximal inspiratory pressuremeasures were found between the extubation success and failure groups (t = 7.371, p < 0.001). A sustained maximal inspiratory pressure cut-off point of

Upload: rhoda-allison

Post on 15-Sep-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A Foucaldian Discourse Analysis of the Ability of Physiotherapy Service Users to Participate in Goal Setting

Physiotherapy December 2002/vol 88/no 12

766

Rhoda AllisonAuckland University of Technology and South Devon Healthcare NHS TrustIntroduction Rehabilitation is an area of healthcare whereit is particularly important to develop a client-focusedapproach. This study examined the ways in whichassessments were conducted and goals of treatment wereagreed between physiotherapists and service users. AFoucaldian discourse analysis was chosen as the researchmethod. This was primarily due to the critical potential ofFoucalt’s approach, with particular reference to the role ofpower and knowledge in relationships between healthcareusers and professionals.

Method Detailed assessments between six service users andphysiotherapists were observed and recorded. The datacomprised transcripts of the assessments, and the text ofpublicised policies, guidelines and standards that were feltto impact on practice. The data also included the access toinformation for both parties before the assessment.

A Foucaldian discourse analysis was used to identify thepredominant discourses that were adopted byphysiotherapists and service users in the assessments. These

discourses were then analysed to identify the subject andpower positions they offered for service users andphysiotherapists, and the power strategies exercised duringthe assessments. This paper introduces Foucault’s conceptsof discourse and power, and demonstrates discourse analysisof several extracts from the assessments.

Findings Discourses of medicine and medicine-basedpractice tended to dominate the assessments. Thesediscourses frequently positioned the physiotherapist in arole of more authority and the service user in a morepassive role. Although discourses of empowerment and userinvolvement were present in the rhetoric of standards andpolicies, they were less apparent in clinical practice.

Discussion Through discussion of the competing discoursesoccurring in these assessments, this paper explores some ofthe difficulties that physiotherapists face with attempts todevelop empowering practices, alongside demands forevidence-based practice and some of the traditionalconstraints of service provision. It highlights the instancesof empowering practices that did occur and considers howthese can be developed.

Sustained Maximal Inspiratory Manoeuvres Can Be Used toPredict Extubation Outcome after Prolonged Periods ofMechanical Ventilation

CARDIO-RESPIRATORY CARE

A Foucaldian Discourse Analysis of the Ability of Physiotherapy Service Users to Participate in Goal Setting

PROFESSIONAL ISSUES

A BrutonUniversity of SouthamptonIntroduction Maximal inspiratory pressure is an acceptedeffort-dependent measure of global inspiratory musclestrength. Although numerous studies have examined itsability to predict weaning/extubation outcome aftermechanical ventilation, maximal inspiratory pressure hasgenerally been found to have lower specificity than isclinically acceptable. The Respiratory Trainer (RT2) is anew device originally conceived as a methodology fortraining the inspiratory muscles. It generates threemeasures of inspiratory muscle function including a newmeasure called sustained maximal inspiratory pressure.This is calculated as the area under the curve produced bysampling maximal inspiratory pressure at 16 Hz during asustained inspiratory manoeuvre.

Method Twenty-seven intubated adults who had requiredprolonged mechanical ventilation (48 hours or more) andwere deemed ready for extubation were measured using theRT2 before extubation. Differences in sustained maximalinspiratory pressure measures between extubation successand failure outcome groups were then sought usingindependent samples t-tests. The sensitivity and specificityof using different levels of sustained maximal inspiratorypressure measures to predict outcome were also calculatedusing receiver operating charactistic curves.

Results Significant differences in sustained maximalinspiratory pressuremeasures were found between theextubation success and failure groups (t = 7.371, p < 0.001).A sustained maximal inspiratory pressure cut-off point of