42629 lecture 3 pt2
DESCRIPTION
The IPD Process: Product CaseTRANSCRIPT
Integrated Product Development Integrated Product Development Process Thomas J. Howard https://sites.google.com/site/thomasjameshowardhomepage/ [email protected]
Unless otherwise stated, this material is under a Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution–Share-Alike licence and can be freely modified, used and redistributed but only under the same licence and if including the following statement:
“Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark”
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
2
The three Key disciplines of Integrated Product Development (IPD)
Market Product
Production Business
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
3
The IPD model
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
4
Purposes, uses and limitations of the IPD model
Purposes: The model will help you to understand IPD and will help you interpret progress and in NPD projects as well past projects
Use: The model can be used as a checklist to identify the relative position of a project and any phases that may have been left out
Limitations: The model will not tell you what to do next or which phases are most important to consider
But mainly... it helps you an IPD mindset!
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
5
Case Study
This case study will help you to relate the IPD model to a real situation
It is also give you some idea of the type of
documentation produced during a real development project
(SLIDES WITH GREEN TITLES)
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
6
Setting the scene
Thank you to Crown Packaging for case study material !
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
8
Project Brief
Follow your integrated Product Development Process throughout this
brief to understand how the development project is structure.
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
9
Team Members
• Jerry Stimpson Closures Business • Jason Hegarty Closures Business • Brian Sequeira Closures Business
Brainstorm team: • Chris Smith CT closures • Keith West CT closures • Chris Ramsey Innovation CT • Henry Ellis-Paul Innovation CT • Alexandre Paris Innovation CT • Thomas Howard Innovation CT
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
10
Mission statement
“To produce an add-on component to enable a
drizzle pouring function.”
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
11
Competitive advantage
• Shape and functional differentiation. Unique with metal closure.
• Salad dressing, marinades, sauces, honey, maple syrup closure with integral pourer (note that this is already on the oil or vinegar market).
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
12
Project approval • Issue 2 • Date ****** • Project number 824 765 0899 5300
• Customer Companies like Craft and Nestle. • Brands Companies like Netto and Irma • Business contact Jason Hegarty • BI Ian Bucklow • CT team Thomas Howard (Project Lead) Chris Ramsey
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
13
Background - Objective
•High interests have been elicited from customers like Craft and Nestle for an integrated pourer for the packs using metal closures.
•It would allow them to offer a product with much more functionality while keeping their current capping facilities.
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
14
Existing oil/vinegar pourers
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
15
Market info • Products Salad dressings, honey, maple syrup, Asian sauces, chilli
sauce… • Existing packaging Glass bottle with 43mm 38mm and 30mm Twist Off
closures: – 43mm: RTO, RTB – 38mm: Regular RTB, RTP, medium MTB, MTP, deep DTB, DTP – 30mm: MTP, MTB, MTO – Pasteurisable compound – Tamper evidence shrink sleeve, tag, button – Decoration Decorated cap, sleeve – Serving size from sprinkle to pour. – Serving time Serving time variable.
• Other packaging on market Glass and plastic bottles with/without integral pourers, metal &plastic caps, ROPP aluminium closures with insert.
***** is the only customer using insert in glass with a metal closure.
• Market location launched in the UK, applicable to Europe • Outlets Supermarkets • Current market size 5-10 M p.a. ( between the 3 sizes / more 38mm than
30mm)
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
16
30 MTO
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
17
Launch info
• Target market +XMpa from plastic injection moulding in glass (also potential large increase from plastic on plastic market if adaptable)
• Target additional cost ~£XX/1000 increase on existing closure. Current 38 deep sold at ~£YY/1000.
< 30-40% increase on existing closure.
• Target launch Short term solution (6-8months): insert pushed in / longer term solution (few years): pourer integrated in cap.
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
18
Musts • Easy and obvious to open and use.
• Unique, giving brand differentiation. • Drip free pouring. • Suits existing capping line with minimal changes (line speed 40-300 cpm). Small
m/c to fit between filler and capper. 400N capping load. • Shelf stable for 2-3 years max. • Suits hot filling 85degC max. • Clean • Able to hold low vacuum. • Adaptable to a range of viscosities • Recyclable. • Organoleptic and alimentary approval – no effect from tainting or scalping. • No changes to the glass finish • Premium look (keep current high image of metal cap on glass). • Be customisable – flexible design. • Comply with current and future food contact regulations
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
19
Desirables • Require no extra processes on the filling line for longer term solution. • Principle could be applied across a range of closures. • Patentable. • Suits steam flushing filling to pull vacuum. • Consumer can vary flow rate in a controlled way. • Integral TE
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
20
Project plan Idea phase • Brief • Research • Brainstorm • Ideas • Review meeting • Gate End October 2008
Concept phase (skipped if we select just one concept at Idea gate) • CAD design • FEA modelling & trials • Models & consumer sales research • Manufacturing routes & costs • Concept gate (select 1 concept) Supplier selection
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
21
Project plan Feasibility phase • Customer approval • Design for manufacture • Pilot tooling • Tooling iterations • Working prototype
Development phase • ROI & Customer funding • Production tool • Customer approval • Launch
END OF BRIEF
Thank you to Crown Packaging for case study material !
Design work from the ideas phase to the concept phase
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
23
Rejected Solutions • Restrictive aperture for controlled flow of product. • Air hole to create smoother flow. • Uses existing cap and it totally concealed. – Messy due to dripping. – Insecure housing.
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
24
Rejected Solutions • Air tube for smoother pouring. • Premium, sophisticated appearance. • An addition rather than an integrated solution. – Gives an unfamiliar brand image. – Difficult to position on product. – Expensive.
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
25
Rejected Solutions • Spring loaded, retractable spout. • Air flow tube for smoother pouring. • Concealed beneath product packaging. – Too many components.
– Too expensive.
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
26
Concept Alternatives...
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
27
Channelled Aperture • Post filling insertion. • Channelled aperture for a controlled flow. • Non drip rim.
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
28
Centre Spout
• Uses existing cap. • Post filling insertion. • Channelled aperture for a controlled
flow. • Non drip rim.
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
29
Insertion options
Pre-fill – Inserted in the bottle before filling. Post-fill – Inserted into the bottle after filling. During capping – Inserted in cap and engaged into bottle during capping.
Bottles Filling
Caps
Capping Distribution
Syrup
1 2
3
1
2
3
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
30
Flexible star • Deeper metal cap • Flexible lips allowing pre-filling insertion. • Angled aperture for controlled flow. • Non Drip pouring spout. • 1 Point pouring.
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
31
Extended Spout
•Post filling insertion. •Multi angle pouring. •Premium look spout. •Non drip rim.
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
32
Extended Spout
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
33
Two Piece • Both parts placed in cap, insertion during
capping. • Holding rim remains in cap after its
removal. • Non drip pouring rim. • Concealed beneath cap.
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
34
Break Away • Single part placed in cap and is
inserted during capping. • Holding bridges break away when
inserting into cap. • Non drip pouring rim. • Concealed beneath cap.
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
35
Break Away • Single part placed in cap and is inserted
during capping. • Holding bridges break away when inserting
into cap. • Non drip pouring rim. • Concealed beneath cap.
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
36
Folding Arms • Deep cap • In-cap solution, inserted during capping. • Non drip pouring rim. • Concealed beneath cap.
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
37
Folding Arms • Deep cap • In-cap solution, inserted during capping. • Non drip pouring rim. • Concealed beneath cap.
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
38
Plastic rim • Attached to cap and engaged during capping. • Push-over notch to secure in position. • Large centre spout (non drip). • Plastic rim exposed on exterior. • Option to remove complete closure.
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
39
Plastic rim • Attached to cap and engaged during capping. • Push-over notch to secure in position. • Large centre spout (non drip). • Plastic rim exposed on exterior. • Option to remove complete closure.
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
40
Selection Criteria
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
41
END OF CASE
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
42
Where did the value lie?
Cheaper, quicker and easier production
Lighter, more sturdy, cheaper, better functioning product
No market differentiation or wow factor
$$$$ $
$
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
43
Where did the value lie?
Cheaper, quicker and easier production
Less functionality and convinience product
Less market differentiation $ $
$$$$
2012 Original material by Thomas J. Howard for course 42629 – Innovation and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark
44
Questions
?