4 attention class1

Upload: animesh-sen

Post on 03-Apr-2018

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    1/49

    1

    Lecture 4: Attention

    Psyc 317: Cognitive

    Psychology

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    2/49

    2

    Todays agenda

    Selective attention

    Different theories: early-selection,

    attenuation, late-selection, perceptualload

    Divided attention

    Effect of: practice, task difficulty, task

    type

    Attention & visual processing

    Overt & covert attention

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    3/49

    3

    What is attention?

    Everyone knows what attention is. William James, 1890

    No one knows what attention is.

    Harold Pashler, 1998

    Attention is a well-studiedphenomenon, but hard to define

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    4/49

    4

    What is attention?

    The ability to focus mental resources on

    something

    Attention is limited Think of attention as a pool of resources

    To attend to something: To pay attention

    to it

    Attended ear - Paying attention to words in

    that ear

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    5/49

    5

    Focusing on just one thing

    Cocktail party metaphor: You are

    talking to someone at a party with a

    lot of other people making noise. You are able to filter out other noise

    and focus just on the person youre

    talking to. How do you do that?

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    6/49

    6

    Four theories of attentional

    selection Early-selection theories

    Broadbents Filter Model

    Triesmans Attenuation Model Late-selection theory

    Perceptual load theory

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    7/49

    7

    Thats a lot of theories!

    In a way, they are all competing

    The theories were developed

    chronologically One theory proposed, had problems, led

    to a new theory

    The development of these theories

    tell a story - keep that in mind!

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    8/49

    8

    Cherrys Dichotic Listening

    Colin Cherry (1953) - Dichotic

    Listening

    Present different messages to each ear

    Subjects paid attention (attended) to

    one ear and ignored the other

    Repeat the attended message out loud -

    shadowing

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    9/49

    9

    Dichotic Listening Results

    Participants shadowed the attended

    message easily

    When asked about the unattendedmessage, they could only report sex

    of voice

    No content was remembered, evenwhen the unattended stream was the

    same word presented 35 times!

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    10/49

    10

    Broadbents Filter Model

    An early-selection model - filtering

    occurs before incoming stimuli are

    analyzed to the semantic level

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    11/49

    11

    Parts of the filter model

    Sensory store - Holds incoming information for a

    short period of time

    Filter - Analyzes messages based on

    physical characteristics like tone of voice,

    pitch, location of stimulus (which ear)

    Detector - Information is processed to

    determine meaning Short-term memory - Holds information for general processing

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    12/49

    12

    Auditory Channels

    Each ear is thought to be a different

    channel that information can come

    in from It is difficult to switch attention from

    one channel to another

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    13/49

    13

    Broadbents Split-Scan

    Study Present letters at the same time to

    each ear:

    -)

    :-)

    :-)

    H M

    R S

    W P

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    14/49

    14

    Broadbents Split-Scan

    Study Two conditions:

    1.) Repeat back all letters in any order

    2.) Repeat back letters in the order theywere presented

    Condition 1 (Any Order):

    H, R, W, M, S, P

    Condition 2 (In Order):

    H, M P?

    :-)

    :-)

    :-)

    H M

    R S

    W P

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    15/49

    15

    Split-Scan Results

    Condition 1 (repeat back in any order)

    65% correct letter report

    Would report all letters presented to one ear

    first Condition 2 (repeat back in presented

    order)

    20% correct letter report

    Harder to switch channels to report backletters

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    16/49

    16

    The filter model explains

    How we can pay attention to one ear

    and ignore stimuli coming into the

    other ear

    Why we prefer to process stimuli that

    come in to one ear all at once asopposed to switching channels

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    17/49

    17

    Problems with filter model

    Back at the cocktail party.

    Youre talking to your friend and

    ignoring all the otherconversations

    Until someone across the room says

    your name. Then you turn your head. But you were supposed to be

    ignoring other conversations - what

    happened?

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    18/49

    18

    Other evidence

    against

    Moray (1959) -Subjects heard theirname in the

    unattended stream Gray & Weddeburn

    (1960) - Shown:

    Response should have

    been Dear 7 Jane But subjects said Dear

    Aunt Jane

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    19/49

    19

    Triesmans attenuation

    model Still an early-selection theory

    Instead of a filter, an attenuator

    analyzes incoming messages Physical characteristics

    Language - Groups of syllables/words

    Attended messages are given morepriority

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    20/49

    20

    Attenuation: Box & arrow

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    21/49

    21

    Attenuation: The Dictionary

    Unit The message gets passed on to the

    dictionary unit

    Threshold =

    Smallest signal

    strength that can

    just be detected

    Easily detected

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    22/49

    22

    Attenuation explains

    Hearing your own name when that

    stream is supposed to be ignored

    Switching channels in order to makea complete sentence

    But a specific dictionary unit? Thatseems like a cop-out.

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    23/49

    23

    Problems with early

    selection MacKay (1973)

    Ambiguous sentences: They were

    throwing stones at the bank Bank = Financial institution or side of a

    river?

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    24/49

    24

    MacKay Method & Results

    Dichotic listening

    Attended stream: Ambiguous sentence

    They were throwing stones at the bank. Unattended stream: Biasing word

    River or Money

    The biasing word had an effect!

    If money, the ambiguous sentence was

    more likely interpreted as financial

    institution

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    25/49

    25

    What does this mean?

    The unattended stream was being

    processed, and it wasnt a name or

    another low-threshold word Not early-selection

    Not an attenuator

    The word was actually beingprocessed to the semantic level (to

    its meaning)

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    26/49

    26

    Late-selection theories

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    27/49

    27

    So whats right?

    Early selection

    We can totally ignore an unattendedstream

    Attenuation

    unless its our own name, then itcaptures our attention

    Late selection or not. Words in the unattended

    stream can also be processed.

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    28/49

    28

    So whats right?

    Theres evidence for EVERYTHING!

    Thats no good.

    Lavie (1995) - Where the filtering

    occurs depends on task load

    How much of a persons cognitiveresources are used in a task

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    29/49

    29

    Perceptual Load Theory

    High-load task: Difficult, requiring

    most of someones cognitive

    resources Only selected items are processed

    Low-load task: Easier, cognitive

    resources are left over Can process additional information

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    30/49

    30

    Flanker Introduction

    Is the center letter an H or S?

    Easy/Compatible:H H H H H

    Hard/Competing:

    S S H S S

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    31/49

    31

    Flanker Compatibility Task

    Decide whether one of the shapes in

    the circles is a square or diamond

    Ignore shapes outside of the circle(flanker)

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    32/49

    32

    Two types of flankers

    Compatible: Outside shape is same

    as target (makes search faster)

    Competing: Outside shape isdifferent than target (makes search

    slower)

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    33/49

    33

    Green & Bavelier (2003)

    Low load: Only one shape in circle

    Flankers

    Compatible Flanker Competing Flanker

    RT: Which one is faster?

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    34/49

    34

    Green & Bavelier (2003)

    High load: Lots of distractor shapes

    in circlesCompatible Flanker Competing Flanker

    Must ignore

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    35/49

    35

    Green & Bavelier:

    Predictions Low-load task: Its easy. Lots of

    cognitive resources left, might as

    well process extra stuff (the flanker)

    High-load task: Its hard. All

    cognitive resources used in theprimary task; none left to process

    extra stuff (the flanker)

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    36/49

    36

    Green & Bavelier: Results

    Increase in RT for

    competing flanker

    How much does the competing flanker hurt performance?

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    37/49

    37

    What does this mean for

    attentional filtering theories?

    High-load task = Attentional resources fully

    used

    No resources left to process extra stimuli

    Early selection - throw out more stimuli (based on

    physical characteristics)

    Low-load task = Attentional resources left

    over Resources are left to process extra stimuli

    Late selection - process stimuli further (up to the

    semantic level)

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    38/49

    38

    Attention & Video Gamers

    Same study on experienced video

    gamers

    Competing distractor

    had same effect in

    both load conditions

    This means attention

    could process more

    information in both

    conditions

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    39/49

    39

    Outline

    Selective attention

    Different theories: early-selection, attenuation,

    late-selection, perceptual load

    Divided attention

    Effect of: practice, task difficulty, task type

    Visual attention

    Visual attention phenomenon

    The distribution of visual attention

    Hemispatial neglect

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    40/49

    40

    Divided Attention

    Can we pay attention to more thanone thing at a time?

    Yes! Think about driving, listening tothe radio and planning dinner

    What factors affect our ability todivide attention?

    Practice

    Task Difficulty

    Task Type

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    41/49

    41

    The Effect of Practice

    Spelke, et. al (1976)

    Task: Read short stories and take

    dictation (write words spoken tothem)

    At first, performance was awful

    After 85 hours of practice,performance was much better

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    42/49

    42

    Schneider & Shiffrin (1977)

    The divided attention task well be

    talking about

    Give subjects a memory set - up to 4letters or numbers

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    43/49

    43

    Consistent Mapping

    Condition Then, present 20 frames VERY fast

    4 possible positions; any/all filled

    Distractors were from the othercategory

    If memory set was numbers, distractors

    were letters

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    44/49

    44

    Was an object from the memory setpresent anywhere in the stream?

    When one number/letter was in the memoryset, it was never a distractor on the next trial

    A distractor on the current trial was never inthe memory set on the next trial

    Schneider & Shiffrin

    Methods

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    45/49

    45

    Schneider & Shiffrin Results

    Beginning: 55% accurate

    900 trials: 90% accurate

    600 trials: Participants reportedautomatic processing (no need to try

    hard to do the task)

    Occurs without intention Uses few cognitive resources

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    46/49

    46

    Automatic performance by

    600 trials

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    47/49

    47

    Automatic processing outside the

    lab Occurs for well-practiced tasks

    Examples?

    When people starting thinking aboutthings, they make errors

    Ever try explaining shoe-tying to a small

    child?

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    48/49

    48

    Can you reduce automatic

    processing?

    What if you increase the number of

    characters in the memory set and in

    each frame? Little effect on performance - still peak

    at 90% accuracy at ~ 900 trials

    So this doesnt seem to increase task

    load

  • 7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1

    49/49

    49

    What does that mean?

    Participants performed tasks in

    parallel

    Required little attention Could divide attention 4 ways easily

    Could deal with all the information