4 attention class1
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
1/49
1
Lecture 4: Attention
Psyc 317: Cognitive
Psychology
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
2/49
2
Todays agenda
Selective attention
Different theories: early-selection,
attenuation, late-selection, perceptualload
Divided attention
Effect of: practice, task difficulty, task
type
Attention & visual processing
Overt & covert attention
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
3/49
3
What is attention?
Everyone knows what attention is. William James, 1890
No one knows what attention is.
Harold Pashler, 1998
Attention is a well-studiedphenomenon, but hard to define
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
4/49
4
What is attention?
The ability to focus mental resources on
something
Attention is limited Think of attention as a pool of resources
To attend to something: To pay attention
to it
Attended ear - Paying attention to words in
that ear
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
5/49
5
Focusing on just one thing
Cocktail party metaphor: You are
talking to someone at a party with a
lot of other people making noise. You are able to filter out other noise
and focus just on the person youre
talking to. How do you do that?
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
6/49
6
Four theories of attentional
selection Early-selection theories
Broadbents Filter Model
Triesmans Attenuation Model Late-selection theory
Perceptual load theory
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
7/49
7
Thats a lot of theories!
In a way, they are all competing
The theories were developed
chronologically One theory proposed, had problems, led
to a new theory
The development of these theories
tell a story - keep that in mind!
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
8/49
8
Cherrys Dichotic Listening
Colin Cherry (1953) - Dichotic
Listening
Present different messages to each ear
Subjects paid attention (attended) to
one ear and ignored the other
Repeat the attended message out loud -
shadowing
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
9/49
9
Dichotic Listening Results
Participants shadowed the attended
message easily
When asked about the unattendedmessage, they could only report sex
of voice
No content was remembered, evenwhen the unattended stream was the
same word presented 35 times!
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
10/49
10
Broadbents Filter Model
An early-selection model - filtering
occurs before incoming stimuli are
analyzed to the semantic level
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
11/49
11
Parts of the filter model
Sensory store - Holds incoming information for a
short period of time
Filter - Analyzes messages based on
physical characteristics like tone of voice,
pitch, location of stimulus (which ear)
Detector - Information is processed to
determine meaning Short-term memory - Holds information for general processing
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
12/49
12
Auditory Channels
Each ear is thought to be a different
channel that information can come
in from It is difficult to switch attention from
one channel to another
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
13/49
13
Broadbents Split-Scan
Study Present letters at the same time to
each ear:
-)
:-)
:-)
H M
R S
W P
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
14/49
14
Broadbents Split-Scan
Study Two conditions:
1.) Repeat back all letters in any order
2.) Repeat back letters in the order theywere presented
Condition 1 (Any Order):
H, R, W, M, S, P
Condition 2 (In Order):
H, M P?
:-)
:-)
:-)
H M
R S
W P
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
15/49
15
Split-Scan Results
Condition 1 (repeat back in any order)
65% correct letter report
Would report all letters presented to one ear
first Condition 2 (repeat back in presented
order)
20% correct letter report
Harder to switch channels to report backletters
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
16/49
16
The filter model explains
How we can pay attention to one ear
and ignore stimuli coming into the
other ear
Why we prefer to process stimuli that
come in to one ear all at once asopposed to switching channels
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
17/49
17
Problems with filter model
Back at the cocktail party.
Youre talking to your friend and
ignoring all the otherconversations
Until someone across the room says
your name. Then you turn your head. But you were supposed to be
ignoring other conversations - what
happened?
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
18/49
18
Other evidence
against
Moray (1959) -Subjects heard theirname in the
unattended stream Gray & Weddeburn
(1960) - Shown:
Response should have
been Dear 7 Jane But subjects said Dear
Aunt Jane
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
19/49
19
Triesmans attenuation
model Still an early-selection theory
Instead of a filter, an attenuator
analyzes incoming messages Physical characteristics
Language - Groups of syllables/words
Attended messages are given morepriority
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
20/49
20
Attenuation: Box & arrow
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
21/49
21
Attenuation: The Dictionary
Unit The message gets passed on to the
dictionary unit
Threshold =
Smallest signal
strength that can
just be detected
Easily detected
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
22/49
22
Attenuation explains
Hearing your own name when that
stream is supposed to be ignored
Switching channels in order to makea complete sentence
But a specific dictionary unit? Thatseems like a cop-out.
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
23/49
23
Problems with early
selection MacKay (1973)
Ambiguous sentences: They were
throwing stones at the bank Bank = Financial institution or side of a
river?
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
24/49
24
MacKay Method & Results
Dichotic listening
Attended stream: Ambiguous sentence
They were throwing stones at the bank. Unattended stream: Biasing word
River or Money
The biasing word had an effect!
If money, the ambiguous sentence was
more likely interpreted as financial
institution
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
25/49
25
What does this mean?
The unattended stream was being
processed, and it wasnt a name or
another low-threshold word Not early-selection
Not an attenuator
The word was actually beingprocessed to the semantic level (to
its meaning)
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
26/49
26
Late-selection theories
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
27/49
27
So whats right?
Early selection
We can totally ignore an unattendedstream
Attenuation
unless its our own name, then itcaptures our attention
Late selection or not. Words in the unattended
stream can also be processed.
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
28/49
28
So whats right?
Theres evidence for EVERYTHING!
Thats no good.
Lavie (1995) - Where the filtering
occurs depends on task load
How much of a persons cognitiveresources are used in a task
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
29/49
29
Perceptual Load Theory
High-load task: Difficult, requiring
most of someones cognitive
resources Only selected items are processed
Low-load task: Easier, cognitive
resources are left over Can process additional information
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
30/49
30
Flanker Introduction
Is the center letter an H or S?
Easy/Compatible:H H H H H
Hard/Competing:
S S H S S
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
31/49
31
Flanker Compatibility Task
Decide whether one of the shapes in
the circles is a square or diamond
Ignore shapes outside of the circle(flanker)
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
32/49
32
Two types of flankers
Compatible: Outside shape is same
as target (makes search faster)
Competing: Outside shape isdifferent than target (makes search
slower)
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
33/49
33
Green & Bavelier (2003)
Low load: Only one shape in circle
Flankers
Compatible Flanker Competing Flanker
RT: Which one is faster?
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
34/49
34
Green & Bavelier (2003)
High load: Lots of distractor shapes
in circlesCompatible Flanker Competing Flanker
Must ignore
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
35/49
35
Green & Bavelier:
Predictions Low-load task: Its easy. Lots of
cognitive resources left, might as
well process extra stuff (the flanker)
High-load task: Its hard. All
cognitive resources used in theprimary task; none left to process
extra stuff (the flanker)
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
36/49
36
Green & Bavelier: Results
Increase in RT for
competing flanker
How much does the competing flanker hurt performance?
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
37/49
37
What does this mean for
attentional filtering theories?
High-load task = Attentional resources fully
used
No resources left to process extra stimuli
Early selection - throw out more stimuli (based on
physical characteristics)
Low-load task = Attentional resources left
over Resources are left to process extra stimuli
Late selection - process stimuli further (up to the
semantic level)
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
38/49
38
Attention & Video Gamers
Same study on experienced video
gamers
Competing distractor
had same effect in
both load conditions
This means attention
could process more
information in both
conditions
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
39/49
39
Outline
Selective attention
Different theories: early-selection, attenuation,
late-selection, perceptual load
Divided attention
Effect of: practice, task difficulty, task type
Visual attention
Visual attention phenomenon
The distribution of visual attention
Hemispatial neglect
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
40/49
40
Divided Attention
Can we pay attention to more thanone thing at a time?
Yes! Think about driving, listening tothe radio and planning dinner
What factors affect our ability todivide attention?
Practice
Task Difficulty
Task Type
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
41/49
41
The Effect of Practice
Spelke, et. al (1976)
Task: Read short stories and take
dictation (write words spoken tothem)
At first, performance was awful
After 85 hours of practice,performance was much better
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
42/49
42
Schneider & Shiffrin (1977)
The divided attention task well be
talking about
Give subjects a memory set - up to 4letters or numbers
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
43/49
43
Consistent Mapping
Condition Then, present 20 frames VERY fast
4 possible positions; any/all filled
Distractors were from the othercategory
If memory set was numbers, distractors
were letters
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
44/49
44
Was an object from the memory setpresent anywhere in the stream?
When one number/letter was in the memoryset, it was never a distractor on the next trial
A distractor on the current trial was never inthe memory set on the next trial
Schneider & Shiffrin
Methods
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
45/49
45
Schneider & Shiffrin Results
Beginning: 55% accurate
900 trials: 90% accurate
600 trials: Participants reportedautomatic processing (no need to try
hard to do the task)
Occurs without intention Uses few cognitive resources
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
46/49
46
Automatic performance by
600 trials
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
47/49
47
Automatic processing outside the
lab Occurs for well-practiced tasks
Examples?
When people starting thinking aboutthings, they make errors
Ever try explaining shoe-tying to a small
child?
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
48/49
48
Can you reduce automatic
processing?
What if you increase the number of
characters in the memory set and in
each frame? Little effect on performance - still peak
at 90% accuracy at ~ 900 trials
So this doesnt seem to increase task
load
-
7/29/2019 4 Attention Class1
49/49
49
What does that mean?
Participants performed tasks in
parallel
Required little attention Could divide attention 4 ways easily
Could deal with all the information