1

2017RUDY BRUNER AWARD

Table of Contents 1

Read and follow the instructions for completing and submitting the application carefully. For your convenience, the following pages are in writable PDF format. Answers to all questions shouldbeconfinedtothespaceprovided.Thecompletedapplication statement must be saved and submitted as directed.

Selection Committee 2

Completing the Application 5

Project Data 8

Project At-A-Glance 10

Project Description 12

Perspectives Community Representative Perspective 15 Public Agency Perspective 18

Developer Perspective 21

Professional Consultant Perspective 24 Architect or Designer Perspective 27

Other Perspective 30

Award Use 33

NOTE:TheAwardUsestatementmustbesavedasaseparate fileasdirected.

2

2017RUDY BRUNER AWARDSELECTION COMMITTEE

3

2017AWARDSELECTIONCOMMITTEE

Kimberly DrigginsDirector of Strategic Planning, City of DetroitDetroit,MI

Kimberly C. Driggins is the Director of Strategic Planning in the City of Detroit’s Planning and DevelopmentDepartment.Inthiscapacity,she is responsible for developing several citywideplanninginitiativesincluding:updatedcomprehensive plan, open space plan, historic preservation plan, and an arts and culture plan.

PriortojoiningtheCityofDetroit,Ms.DrigginsworkedfortheDistrictofColumbia’sOfficeof Planning for seven years, as the Associate Director for Citywide Planning. She was responsible for managing planning studies in severalareasincluding:housing,economicdevelopment, transportation, facilities and capital improvement planning.

Inaddition,Ms.Drigginsservedastheprojectmanager for several creative placemaking initiativesincluding;TemporaryUrbanismprogram, Kresge Foundation and ArtPlace grants,andtheThirdPlaceinitiative.

Ms.Drigginsbeganhercareerasaconsultantworking on real estate, affordable housing, and neighborhood revitalization projects in the privateandnon-profitsectors.ShereceivedaMasterofPublicPolicy(MPP)degreefromtheUniversityofChicagoandaBachelorofArtsdegree, with highest honors, in political science fromHamptonUniversity.

Mostrecently,Ms.DrigginswasaLoebFellow(2016)atHarvardUniversity’sGraduateSchoolof Design; where she explored the intersection of design, civic engagement and creative placemaking through the lens of equity and inclusion.

David Lee, FAIAPresident, StullandLeeIncorporated,ArchitectsBoston,MA

DavidLee’sarchitecturalprojectsincludetheSavinHillMBTATransitStation,theJohnD.O’BryantAfricanAmericanInstituteatNortheasternUniversity,theOakwoodShoresTerraceApartmentsinChicago,andresidentialcommissionsinCharlestown,BrooklineandCambridgeMA.

Mr.Lee’splanningandurbandesignprojectsinclude master plans for Pittsburgh’s Hill District, the award winning houses at Dutch Point in Hartford, Connecticut and a visioning study for the future of the Ruggles StreetCorridorinRoxbury’sMadisonParkneighborhood.

Current projects under his direction include the DewittCommunityCenter,TheClarion,amixeduseapartmentbuildinginBoston,thedesignofnewMDOTrailstationsatNorthamptonandGreenfield,MA.andthedesignofa25storyofficeandresidentialtowerinRoxbury’sDudleySquare.

Mr.LeeservedasPresidentoftheBostonSociety of Architects in 1992. He was the recipientoftheBostonSocietyofArchitects’Year 2000 Award of Honor.

Mr.Leelecturesthroughoutthecountryandserves on numerous professional panels and designjuriesincludingthe2016NationalAmericanInstituteofArchitectsHousingAwardsJuryandAIA/HUDSecretary’sAwardsJury.

He is a former Adjunct Professor of Planning and UrbanDesignattheHarvardGraduateSchoolofDesign and previously served on the faculties of MITandtheRhodeIslandSchoolofDesign.

LeeisChairoftheBoardofTrusteesoftheMassachusettsCollegeofArtandDesign.

Knox WhiteMayor Greenville,SC

KnoxWhitehasservedasMayorofGreenvillesinceDecember1995.AsMayorhehasthegoalofmakingthecityofGreenville“themostbeautiful and livable city in America.” He has emphasized neighborhood revitalization and transformational projects for downtown.

Keystrategicprojectsinclude:removaloftheCamperdownBridgeandcreationofFallsPark, the restoration of the Poinsett Hotel and CourtStreet,newretail(MastGeneralStore),adowntownbaseballstadium(FluorField),riverfront development and initiation of a bike andwalkingtrailsystem(SwampRabbitTrail)throughout the City, public art initiatives along MainStreet,recordannexations,andamodelinfrastructureforClemsonICAR.

Neighborhood initiatives include enhanced beautificationefforts,trafficcalming,sidewalkconstruction, support for neighborhood associations, reinvestment in neighborhood parks, master plans for commercial corridors, and attractive new housing in the city’s special emphasis neighborhoods.

Underthemayor’sleadership,theCitymaintainsa“TripleA”(AAA)bondratingandenjoys a reputation for solving problems on an innovative and bipartisan basis.

AnativeofGreenville,andagraduateofChristChurchEpiscopalSchool,GreenvilleHighSchool,WakeForestUniversityandtheUniversityofSouthCarolinaLawSchool.KnoxWhiteisapartnerinthelawfirmofHaynsworth,Sinkler&Boyd,whereheheadsthefirm’simmigrationandcustomspractices.HeandhiswifeMarshahavetwochildren.

4

2013AWARDSELECTIONCOMMITTEE(CONT’D)

Deidre Schmidt

President & CEO, CommonBondCommunitiesMinneapolis,MN

Scot Spencer

Associate Director, AnnieE.CaseyFoundationBaltimore,MD

DeidreSchmidtisthePresident&CEOofCommonBondCommunities,anationally-recognized leader and innovator in the affordable housing industry. Active since 1971, CommonBondowns,managesandprovidesAdvantagesServicesforapproximately5,700unitsinMinnesota,WisconsinandIowa.Theorganization serves a diverse population including families, seniors, people living with disabilities and the formerly homeless.

Ms.Schmidt’spriorpositionsincludedPrincipalatOneRoofGlobalConsultingandExecutiveDirectoroftheAffordableHousingInstitute,aBoston-basednon-profitthatworksexclusivelyoutsideoftheUnitedStates,withafocusonthe global south. She was also Vice President ofDevelopmentatBrightonDevelopment,AcquisitionManagerattheNationalEquityFund and Director of National Consulting at ArtSpace Projects.

Ms.SchmidtwasaLoebFellowattheGraduateSchoolofDesignatHarvardUniversityandaMarshallMemorialFellowfortheGermanMarshallFund.ShewastheJohnT.DunlopLectureratHarvard’sGraduateSchoolof Design where she taught Housing and UrbanizationinGlobalCities.ShealsoteachesAffordableMultifamilyRentalHousingFinanceattheUniversityofMinnesota’sHumphreySchool of Public Affairs.

Willet Moss, PLAPrincipal, CMGLandscapeArchitectureSan Francisco, CA

WillettMossisafoundingpartnerofCMGLandscapeArchitecture,aFellowoftheAmerican Academy in Rome, and a landscape architect of public and institutional landscapes. Mr.Moss’workreflectshisrangeofinterestswith a consistent focus on landscapes of broad value and public appeal.

His project experience includes community-based design, sustainable urban systems, planning rooted in ecological understanding, and making historic resources relevant today.

Some of his noteworthy projects are the transformationofMintPlaza,MarinCountryDaySchool,SunnylandsAnnenbergEstate,andtheUCBerkeleyLowerSproulPlaza.

He designs by rapidly representing spaces anddefininglandscapeexperiences.ForMrMoss,goodpublicspaceshaveclearpurpose,whether symbolic or utilitarian, and contribute to community identity as memorable additions to the landscape. He creates art and research focused on the intersection of public landscape, bodily experience, and collective memory, based on a longstanding appreciation for richly textured and varied environments.

Scot Spencer is Associate Director for Advocacy andInfluenceatTheAnnieE.CaseyFoundation.Inthisrole,hesupportsanationalportfolioof work to advance place based policies, practices and strategies which aim to afford greater opportunities for children, families and communities to succeed. He also coordinates a portfolio of local advocacy work in support ofCasey’shometowneffortsinBaltimore.From2002to2010,Mr.SpencerwasManagerofBaltimoreRelationsatCaseywheretheFoundation’sworkhasbeenfocusedontheEastBaltimorerevitalizationefforttostrengthencommunity and economic development in an historic working class neighborhood.

Mr.Spencer’spreviousworkincludes:transportationadvocacywiththeEnvironmentalDefense Fund; community development in BaltimoreandAlbany,NY;architecturalpracticein upstate New York and alumni relations.

HecurrentlychairstheboardofSmartGrowthAmerica and serves on the boards of Center Stage, the Orton Family Foundation, the Funders’NetworkforSmartGrowthandLivableCommunities, Rail-Volution, the Center for CommunityProgressandtheCentralMarylandTransportationAlliance.InBaltimore,ScotservesontheBaltimoreCommunityFoundation’sneighborhoods committee and served as co-chair oftheOpportunityCollaborative,Baltimore’sHUDfundedSustainableCommunitiesInitiativesteering committee.

Since1994,Mr.SpencerhascalledBaltimorehishome.ScotholdsaBachelorsinBuildingScience,BachelorsofArchitectureandMastersofScienceinUrbanandEnvironmentalStudiesfromRensselaerPolytechnicInstitute.

5

2017RUDY BRUNER AWARDCOMPLETING THE APPLICATION

6

The Rudy Bruner AwardAmerican cities embody our nation’s greatest triumphs and most daunting challenges. At their best they showcase the rich diversity, cultural achievement, and democratic values that characterize the American spirit. At their worst theyreflectourcountry’smostpersistentsocialills – economic disparity, hopelessness, neglect and abandonment. Yet there are those places that are developed with such vision and imagination that they transform urban problems into creative solutions.Byrecognizingtheseextraordinaryplaces, the Rudy Bruner Award (RBA) seeks to promote fresh and innovative thinking about cities, and to encourage us all to demand excellence in our urban environments.

Excellenceexistsineverycity.Itcanbefoundin downtowns, neighborhoods, in small cities and largeones.ThepurposeoftheAwardistodiscover places that embody economic, and envi-ronmental factors.

Theseplacesoftentranscendtheboundariesbetween architecture, urban design, and planning.Theyarebornthroughprocessesoftransformation – the renewal of something old, or the creation of something new that resonates in thehistoryofcommunitylife.Theseextraordinaryplaces enrich the quality of the urban experience, and serve as models for placemaking in cities across the country.

Eligibility/Who May Apply• The project must be a real place, not just a plan or program. Programs alone will not be considered.

•Sincesitevisitsareintegraltotheaward process, the project must have been in operationforasufficientamountoftime to demonstrate success.

•Theprojectmustbelocatedinthe contiguous 48 states.Itisnotfeasibleto conduct site visits at international locations or in Alaska or Hawaii.

•Therearenodistinctcategories.Projects may include any type of place which makes a positive contribution to the urban environment.

• Urbanenvironmentisbroadlydefinedto include incorporated cities, towns, or villages; a neighborhood within a city; an urban county; or anofficiallyrecognizedregionmadeupoftwo or more cities.

•Applicationsmaybeinitiatedbyanypersonwho has been involved in the planning, development or operation of a project.

•PreviousapplicantsandHonorableMention winners may re-apply. Previous winners are not eligible. Please do not apply more than three times.

project – such as drawings and photographs – are important, the selection will be based upon the quality of the project rather than the elaborateness of the presentation. We encourage you to visit our website to view information about past winners including completed applications. Read and follow the instructions for completing and submitting the application carefully. For your convenience, the application is provided in a writable PDF format. Answers to all questions shouldbeconfinedtothespaceprovided.Thecompleted application must be saved as a PDF andsubmittedelectronicallyasdirected.Toassistthe Selection Committee in its review process, a copy of each application will be available as both anelectronicfileandahardcopy(inathree-ringbinderon8-1/2”x11”paperproducedbytheBrunerFoundation).Pleasekeepthisinmindwhen preparing and formatting.

The completed application must include: 1. Cover Sheet Providean8.5”x11”coverpagewiththe project name, city and state, applicant name, and a photograph that best represents the completed project.

2. Project Data

3. Project At-A-Glance NOTE:ProjectData,Project-At-A-Glance and one representative photo are sent to the Committee in advance of the initial meeting.Itisimportanttomakethese descriptions succinct and clear.

4. Project Description Project Description asks about the values underlyingtheproject.TheRudy Bruner Award recognizes that values are implicit in the process of placemaking, and form the basis for many of the decisions and trade- offs required in a complex process.

5.Perspective Sheets See information at right.

6.Visual Representation A clear visual representation of the project is required, but need not be elaborate orcostly. Straightforward photographic imagesareadequate.Illustrativemaps, plans and diagrams are also very helpful. Imagecaptionsandcreditsareencouraged. Thevisualrepresentationshouldbe formattedasan8.5”x11”document(25- pagemaximum).Finalistswillbeaskedto submitoriginalimagefilesimmediately followingnotification.

7. Optional Supplementary Pages Supplementary materials such as brochures, news articles, published reports or other relevant documents should be added only if they contribute to the understanding oftheproject.Videoandaudiofileswillnot be accepted. Supplementary materials shouldbeformattedasan8.5”x11” document(25-pagemaximum).Finalistswill beaskedtosubmitoriginalfilesimmediately followingnotification.

Perspective SheetsPerspective sheets are provided to assist people who were involved in the project in describing theirpersonalororganizationalpointofview.Itisimportant that as many people as appropriate from the following categories complete perspective sheets; a minimum of 4 sheets is required as part of the application. Applicants may use their discretion to identify which categories are most pertinenttotheirproject.Categoriesinclude:

•CommunityRepresentativeperspective;

•PublicAgencyperspective(fromlocal, stateorfederalgovernmentagencies);

•Developerperspective;

•ProfessionalConsultantperspective;

•ArchitectorDesignerperspective;

•Otherperspective(whichmightnotfit abovecategories).

Please obtain as wide an array of perspectives aspossible.Morethanone“Other”perspectivemaybesubmittedifappropriate.Usetheperspectivesheetmarked“Other”forpeoplewhodonotfitintothecategoriesprovidedorfor a unique point of view that will enhance your submission.Thecompletedperspectivesheetsmust be included in the application package.

Preparing the SubmissionInpreparationforsubmission,theapplication should be saved in the following components. You will be prompted to upload these during the onlinesubmissionprocess.Saveeachfileusingthespecifiednamingstructure,insertingyourproject’sname in lieu of [Project Name] at the beginning of eachfilenameasindicated.LimitProjectNameto25charactersorless.

• FULL APPLICATION: Pages 8-32 of the completed application saved as a print resolution PDF(300dpi)withamaximumfilesizeof25MB. Savethefileas: [Project Name]_FULL

• PROJECT OVERVIEW: A separate copy oftheProjectDataandProject-at-a-Glance forms and the representative photo included onthecoverpage(formattedonaseparate 8.5”x11”page),savedasasingle,three-page pdf.ThiswillbeforwardedtotheSelection Committeepriortothefirstmeeting.The ProjectOverviewfileshouldhavearesolution of300dpiwithamaximumsizeof4MB. Saveas:[Project Name]_OVERVIEW

COMPLETINGTHEAPPLICATIONCompleting the Application (cont.) 8. Award Use Awardmoniesmustbeusedtobenefit the project or related initiatives. A statement on proposed use of Award monies must be included in the application, but will not be consideredbytheSelectionCommittee.Itwill be opened after winner selection, and may be used in press statements or other pro- motional material. Save this document as a separate pdf.

Completing the ApplicationTheapplicationisdesignedtoprovidetheopportunity to tell the story of the project and elicit multiple perspectives. Applicants are encouraged to concentrate their efforts on providing a clear description of the project and thorough answers to questions. Although visual representations of the

Completing the Application (cont.)

7

Rudy Bruner Award ArchivesAdditional information about the Award including its history, selection committees, case studies and publications about past winners, blog posts, events and other activities is available via the Rudy Bruner Award website.ThewebsiteincludesalinktotheRudyBrunerAwardDigitalArchivehostedbytheUniversityofBuffaloLibrarieswhichprovidesonline access to all Rudy Bruner Award winner applications from 1987 to the present. Visit rudybruneraward.org for more information.

Completed Applications• Uponsubmission,applicationsbecomethe propertyoftheBrunerFoundation,and cannot be returned.

• Atthecloseoftheawardcycle,applications will bepermanentlyhousedattheUniversityof BuffaloLibraries.

• Portionsofthewinnerapplicationswill be posted on the Rudy Bruner Award website.

•Completewinnerapplicationsareposted onUniversityofBuffaloLibrariesRudy Bruner Award Archive website.

•TheBrunerFoundationreservestheright to use, reproduce, or make available to others, for any purpose whatsoever, the material submitted.

COMPLETINGTHEAPPLICATION(CONT’D)

Notice:Projects fromGreenville,SCare not eligible for the 2017 Award due to the participation of Mayor Knox on the 2017 Selection Committee. WewelcomeLittleRockprojectsinfutureyears.

2017 Selection CommitteeKnox WhiteMayorGreenville,SC

Kimberly DrigginsDirector of Strategic Planning, City of DetroitDetroit,MI

David Lee, FAIAPresident,StullandLeeIncorporated,ArchitectsBoston,MA

Willet Moss, PLAPrincipal,CMGLandscapeArchitecture,San Francisco, CA

Deidre SchmidtPresident&CEO,CommonBondCommunities,Minneapolis,MN

Scot SpencerAssociateDirector,AnnieE.CaseyFoundation,Baltimore,MD

2017 Rudy Bruner Award Winners

Gold Medal: Miller’s Court, Baltimore,MD

Silver Medals: Falls Park on the Reedy, Greenville,SC

Grand Rapids Downtown Market, GrandRapids,MI

Quixote Village Olympia, WA

Uptown District Cleveland, OH

Key Dates:• Submissionsmustbereceivedatthe Foundation no later than midnight on Thursday, December 8, 2016.

• Applicationsreceivedaftermidnighton

December 8,2016willnotbeconsidered.

• FivefinalistswillbenotifiedbyMonday, February 6, 2017.

• SitevisitstofinalistswilltakeplaceinFebruary-May, 2017.

•TheGoldandSilverMedalWinnerswillbe selectedandnotifiedinJune 2017.

•PresentationsoftheRudy Bruner Award for Urban Excellence will be made in Fall 2017.

Contact Information: Tel:617-492-8404 E-mail:rba@brunerfoundation.org

Prizes and PresentationTheRudy Bruner Award for Urban Excellence is given tofivewinningprojectsineachbiennialawardcycle.

•OneGoldMedalWinnerisawarded$50,000.

•FourSilverMedalWinnersareeach awarded$10,000.

• Thewinningprojectteamsmayuseprize moneyinanywaytheychoosetobenefit the project.

• AllwinnersarepromotedbytheBruner Foundation and are included in case studies published by the Foundation at the end of each award cycle.

• Allwinnerswillbefeaturedinaward ceremonies, and a media outreach effort.

•WinnersmaybefeaturedinfutureBruner-Loeb Forums. Visit www.brunerloeb.org for more information.

Preparing the Submission (cont.)

• REPRESENTATIVE PHOTO: An original imagefileoftheRepresentativePhotoincluded ontheCoverPageandProjectOverview(as detailedabove)witharesolutionof300dpiand maximumfilesizeof4MB.Acceptablefiletypes include:jpg,gif,tiff,png.Includephotographer’s nameinthefilenameasindicated.Savethefile as:[Project Name]_IMAGE_[photographer’sfull name]

• AWARD USE FORM:TheAwardUse formasasinglepdfwithamaximumfilesizeof 4MB.Savethefileas:[Project Name]_AWARD

Submitting the Application• Applications must be submitted electronically via the online system at brunerfoundation.submittable.com Ifyoudonothaveaccesstotheonlinesystem, contactourofficeatrba@brunerfoundation.org or617.484.8404.

• Youwillbeaskedtoregisterinorderto begin the online application process.

• If you encounter difficulties during the online submission process, please contact the Submittable support system for assistance at support@submittable.com or 855-467-8264.

The Selection Process

Establishedin1987,theRudy Bruner Award recognizesoneGoldMedalWinnerandfourSilverMedalwinnersineachbiennialcycle.TheRudy Bruner Award is distinguished from other award programs by its broad eligibility criteria; the multi-disciplinary Selection Committee; and the detailed on-siteevaluationofeachfinalist.Eachawardcycleis documented in a book, which includes in-depth case studies of the winners and a distillation of the SelectionCommitteediscussion.ThepublicationsareavailablefromtheBrunerFoundation.TheFoundation does not restrict the kinds of projects thatmayapply.Urbanexcellenceisadynamicand changing concept, and the Award is enriched by a diversity of applications. Rudy Bruner Award winners are not selected through an established set of criteria. Rather, the issues emerge from the Selection Committee discussion of the applications.

8

2017RUDY BRUNER AWARDPROJECT DATA

9

Pleaseanswerquestionsinspaceprovided.Ifpossible,answerstoallquestionsshouldbetypedorwrittendirectlyontheforms.Iftheformsarenotusedandanswers are typed on a separate page, each answer must be preceded by the question to which it responds, and the length of each answer should be limited to the area provided on the original form.

PROJECTDATA

ProjectName Location City State

Owner

ProjectUse(s)

Project Size TotalDevelopmentCost

AnnualOperatingBudget(ifappropriate)

DateInitiated PercentCompletedbyDecember1,2016

ProjectCompletionDate(ifappropriate) ProjectWebsite(ifappropriate)

Attach, if you wish, a list of relevant project dates

Application submitted by:

Name Title

Organization

Address City/State/Zip

Telephone() E-mail

Perspective Sheets:

Organization Name Telephone/e-mail

Public Agencies

Architect/Designer

Developer

Professional Consultant

CommunityGroup

Other

Please indicate how you learned of the Rudy Bruner Award for Urban Excellence.(Checkallthatapply).

__DirectMailing __DirectEmail __ Previous Selection Committee member

__ Professional __PreviousRBAentrant __ Online Notice

__ Facebook __SocialMedia __Bruner/LoebForum

TheundersignedgrantstheBrunerFoundationpermissiontouse,reproduce,ormakeavailableforreproductionorusebyothers,andtopostontheBruner

Foundationwebsites,thematerialssubmitted.Theapplicantwarrantsthattheapplicanthasfullpowerandauthoritytosubmittheapplicationandallattached

materials and to grant these rights and permissions.

Signature Date

__Professional Organization

__Other(pleasespecify)

__________________________________

10

2017RUDY BRUNER AWARDPROJECT AT-A-GLANCE

11

Pleaseanswerquestionsinspaceprovided.Ifpossible,answerstoallquestionsshouldbetypedorwrittendirectlyontheforms.Iftheformsarenotusedandanswers are typed on a separate page, each answer must be preceded by the question to which it responds, and the length of each answer should be limited to the

area provided on the original form.

Thissheet,theProjectDatasheet,andtherepresentativephotowillbesenttotheCommitteeinadvanceastheProject Overview.

Project Name

Address City/State/ZIP

1.Giveabriefoverviewoftheproject (500 words max).

2. Why does the project merit the Rudy Bruner Award for Urban Excellence ?(Youmaywishtoconsidersuchfactorsas:effectontheurbanenvironment;innovativeoruniqueapproachestoanyaspectofprojectdevelopment;newandcreativeapproachestourbanissues;designquality. (500 words max)

PROJECTAT-A-GLANCE

12

2017RUDY BRUNER AWARDPROJECT DESCRIPTION

13

PROJECTDESCRIPTIONPleaseanswerquestionsinspaceprovided.Ifpossible,answerstoallquestionsshouldbetypedorwrittendirectlyontheforms.Iftheformsarenotusedandanswers are typed on a separate page, each answer must be preceded by the question to which it responds, and the length of each answer should be limited to the area provided on the original form.

1. Describe the underlying values and goals of the project. What, if any, signifcant trade-offs were required to implement the project? (500 words max)

2.Brieflydescribetheproject’surbancontext.Howhastheprojectimpactedthelocalcommunity?Whodoestheprojectserve? How many people are served by the project? (500 words max)

14

3. Describe the key elements of the development process, including community participation where appropriate. (300 words max)

5.Istheprojectuniqueand/ordoesitaddresssignificanturbanissues?Isthemodeladaptabletootherurbansettings? (300 words max)

PROJECTDESCRIPTION(CONT’D)

4.Describethefinancingoftheproject.Pleaseincludeallfundingsourcesandsquarefootcostswhereapplicable. (300 words max)

15

2017RUDY BRUNER AWARDCOMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVE PERSPECTIVE

16

COMMUNITYREPRESENTATIVEPERSPECTIVEPleaseanswerquestionsinspaceprovided.Ifpossible,answerstoallquestionsshouldbetypedorwrittendirectlyontheforms.Iftheformsarenotusedandanswers are typed on a separate page, each answer must be preceded by the question to which it responds, and the length of each answer should be limited to the area provided on the original form.

Thissheetistobefilledoutbysomeonewhowasinvolved,orrepresentsanorganizationthatwasinvolved,inhelpingtheprojectrespondtoneighborhoodissues.

Name Title

Organization Telephone()

Address City/State/ZIP

E-mail Website

TheundersignedgrantstheBrunerFoundationpermissiontouse,reproduce,ormakeavailableforreproductionorusebyothers,foranypurposewhatsoever,thematerialssubmitted.Theapplicantwarrantsthattheapplicanthasfullpowerandauthoritytosubmittheapplicationandallattachedmaterialsandtograntthese rights and permissions.

Signature Date

1. How did you, or the organization you represent, become involved in this project? What role did you play? (300 words max)

2. From the community’s point of view, what were the major issues concerning this project? (300 words max)

17

3.Hasthisprojectmadethecommunityabetterplacetoliveorwork?Ifso,how? (500 words max)

4. Would you change anything about this project or the development process you went through? (500 words max)

COMMUNITYREPRESENTATIVEPERSPECTIVE(CONT’D)

18

2017RUDY BRUNER AWARDPUBLIC AGENCY PERSPECTIVE

19

Pleaseanswerquestionsinspaceprovided.Ifpossible,answerstoallquestionsshouldbetypedorwrittendirectlyontheforms.Iftheformsarenotusedandanswers are typed on a separate page, each answer must be preceded by the question to which it responds, and the length of each answer should be limited to the area provided on the original form.

Thissheetistobefilledoutbystaffrepresentative(s)ofpublicagency(ies)whoweredirectlyinvolvedinthefinancing,designreview,orpublicapprovalsthataffected this project.

Name Title

Organization Telephone()

Address City/State/ZIP

E-mail Website

TheundersignedgrantstheBrunerFoundationpermissiontouse,reproduce,ormakeavailableforreproductionorusebyothers,foranypurposewhatsoever,thematerialssubmitted.Theapplicantwarrantsthattheapplicanthasfullpowerandauthoritytosubmittheapplicationandallattachedmaterialsandtograntthese rights and permissions.

Signature Date

1. What role did your agency play in the development of this project? Describe any requirements made of this project by your agency (e.g.,zoning,publicparticipation,publicbenefits,impactstatements). (300 words max)

2. Howwasthisprojectintendedtobenefityourcity?Whattrade-offsandcompromiseswererequiredtoimplementtheproject? How did your agency participate in making them? (300 words max)

PUBLICAGENCYPERSPECTIVE

20

3.Describetheproject’simpactonyourcity.Pleasebeasspecificaspossible. (300 words max)

4.Didthisprojectresultinnewmodelsofpublic/privatepartnerships?Arethereaspectsofthisprojectthatwouldbeinstructivetoagencieslikeyours in other cities? (300 words max)

5.Whatdoyouconsidertobethemostandleastsuccessfulaspectsofthisproject? (300 words max)

PUBLICAGENCYPERSPECTIVE(CONT’D)

21

2017RUDY BRUNER AWARDDEVELOPER PERSPECTIVE

22

Pleaseanswerquestionsinspaceprovided.Ifpossible,answerstoallquestionsshouldbetypedorwrittendirectlyontheforms.Iftheformsarenotusedandanswers are typed on a separate page, each answer must be preceded by the question to which it responds, and the length of each answer should be limited to the area provided on the original form.

Thissheetistobefilledoutbythepersonwhotookprimaryresponsibilityforprojectfinancingorisarepresentativeofthegroupwhichdid.

Name Title

Organization Telephone()

Address City/State/ZIP

E-mail Website

TheundersignedgrantstheBrunerFoundationpermissiontouse,reproduce,ormakeavailableforreproductionorusebyothers,foranypurposewhatsoever,thematerialssubmitted.Theapplicantwarrantsthattheapplicanthasfullpowerandauthoritytosubmittheapplicationandallattachedmaterialsand to grant these rights and permissions.

Signature Date

1. What role did you or your company play in the development of this project? Describe the scope of involvement. (300 words max)

2. What trade-offs or compromises were required during the development of the project? (300 words max)

DEVELOPERPERSPECTIVE

23

3.Howwastheprojectfinanced?What,ifany,innovativemeansoffinancingwereused? (500 words max)

4. What do you consider to be the most and least successful aspects of the project? (500 words max)

DEVELOPERPERSPECTIVE(CONT’D)

24

2017RUDY BRUNER AWARDPROFESSIONAL CONSULTANTPERSPECTIVE

25

PROFESSIONALCONSULTANTPERSPECTIVEPleaseanswerquestionsinspaceprovided.Ifpossible,answerstoallquestionsshouldbetypedorwrittendirectlyontheforms.Iftheformsarenotusedandanswers are typed on a separate page, each answer must be preceded by the question to which it responds, and the length of each answer should be limited to the area provided on the original form.

Thissheetistobefilledoutbyaprofessionalwhoworkedasaconsultantontheproject,providingdesign,planning,legal,orotherservices.Copiesmaybegivento other professionals if desired.

Name Title

Organization Telephone()

Address City/State/ZIP

E-mail Website

TheundersignedgrantstheBrunerFoundationpermissiontouse,reproduce,ormakeavailableforreproductionorusebyothers,foranypurposewhatsoever,thematerialssubmitted.Theapplicantwarrantsthattheapplicanthasfullpowerandauthoritytosubmittheapplicationandallattachedmaterialsandtograntthese rights and permissions.

Signature Date

1. What role did you or your organization play in the development of this project? (300 words max)

2.Describetheproject’simpactonitscommunity.Pleasebeasspecificaspossible. (300 words max)

26

3. How might this project be instructive to others in your profession? (500 words max)

4. What do you consider to be the most and least successful aspects of this project? (500 words max)

PROFESSIONALCONSULTANTPERSPECTIVE(CONT’D)

27

2017RUDY BRUNER AWARDARCHITECT OR DESIGNERPERSPECTIVE

28

ARCHITECTORDESIGNERPERSPECTIVEPleaseanswerquestionsinspaceprovided.Ifpossible,answerstoallquestionsshouldbetypedorwrittendirectlyontheforms.Iftheformsarenotusedandanswers are typed on a separate page, each answer must be preceded by the question to which it responds, and the length of each answer should be limited to

the area provided on the original form.

Thissheetistobefilledoutbyadesignprofessionalwhoworkedasaconsultantontheproject,providingdesign,planning,orotherservices.Copiesmaybe

given to other design professionals if desired.

Name Title

Organization Telephone()

Address City/State/ZIP

E-mail Website

TheundersignedgrantstheBrunerFoundationpermissiontouse,reproduce,ormakeavailableforreproductionorusebyothers,foranypurposewhatsoever,thematerialssubmitted.Theapplicantwarrantsthattheapplicanthasfullpowerandauthoritytosubmittheapplicationandallattachedmaterialsandtograntthese rights and permissions.

Signature Date

1. Describe the design concept of this project, including urban design considerations, choice of materials, scale, etc. (300 words max)

2. Describe the most important social and programmatic functions of the design. (300 words max)

29

3. Describe the major challenges of designing this project and any design trade-offs or compromises required to complete the project. (500 words max)

4. Describe the ways in which the design relates to its urban context. (500 words max)

ARCHITECTORDESIGNERPERSPECTIVE(CONT’D)

30

2017RUDY BRUNER AWARDOTHER PERSPECTIVE

31

OTHERPERSPECTIVEPleaseanswerquestionsinspaceprovided.Ifpossible,answerstoallquestionsshouldbetypedorwrittendirectlyontheforms.Iftheformsarenotusedandanswers are typed on a separate page, each answer must be preceded by the question to which it responds, and the length of each answer should be limited to the area provided on the original form.

Name Title

Organization Telephone()

Address City/State/ZIP

E-mail Website

TheundersignedgrantstheBrunerFoundationpermissiontouse,reproduce,ormakeavailableforreproductionorusebyothers,foranypurposewhatsoever,thematerialssubmitted.Theapplicantwarrantsthattheapplicanthasfullpowerandauthoritytosubmittheapplicationandallattachedmaterialsandtograntthese rights and permissions.

Signature Date

1. What role did you play in the development of this project? (300 words max)

2.Describetheimpactthatthisprojecthashadontheyourcommunity.Pleasebeasspecificaspossible. (300 words max)

32

3. What trade-offs and compromises were required during the development of the project? Did you participate in making them? (500 words max)

4. What do you consider to be the the most and least successful aspects of this project? (500 words max)

OTHERPERSPECTIVE(CONT’D)

33

2017RUDY BRUNER AWARDAWARD USE

34

Pleaseanswerquestionsinspaceprovided.Answerstoallquestionsshouldbetypedorwrittendirectlyontheforms.Iftheformsarenotusedandanswersaretyped on a separate page, each answer must be preceded by the question to which it responds, and the length of each answer should be limited to the area provided on the original form.

Separate this page from the rest of the application. Save and submit it as a separate file as directed. It will not be used in judging entries or be seen bymembers of the Selection Committee.

PleasedescribehowAwardmonieswillbeusedtobenefittheproject.(TheAwardcheckwillbemadeouttotheApplicantunlessotherwisespecified.)

*Thisstatementshouldbesignedbytheapplicant.

AWARDUSE

Signature Date

Name Title

*