2013 beya seminar: quality assurance increasing workfore effectiveness expertise and reliability
DESCRIPTION
Quality assurance must ensure all areas of the organization are meeting performance standards as set forth in internal quality assurance surveillance plans. Clear roles and responsibilities, performance objectives, and methods of measuring and monitoring quality ensure that the vision of the organization is properly implemented. How can you promote the importance and best practices of sustaining and implementing quality assurance programs? At the end of this session, participants will be able to: a. Understand how to ensure teams are aligned with values of quality assurance b. Discuss methods to improve reliability, accountability, and performance c. Explore methods of measuring and monitoring quality Learning Outcomes: Participants will increase value and improve performance by designing and or assessing current Quality Assurance strategies that impact overall team and individual accuracy, efficiency, and reliability.TRANSCRIPT
QUALITY ASSURANCE:
INCREASING WORKFORCE
EFFECTIVENESS, EXPERTISE,
AND RELIABILITY
Presenters:
Dennis Owens, Patrice Gregory, and J. Anthony Wingate
Friday, February 8, 2013 | 8:15 a.m. – 9:30 a.m.
Washington Marriott Wardman Park | Maryland Suite A
Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly
owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security
Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.
SAND #: 2012-7175 P
Unlimited Release (UR)
Topic Requirements:
Quality Assurance: Increasing Workforce Effectiveness, Expertise, and Reliability Quality assurance must ensure all areas of the organization are meeting performance standards as set forth in internal quality assurance surveillance plans. Clear roles and responsibilities, performance objectives, and methods of measuring and monitoring quality ensure that the vision of the organization is properly implemented. How can you promote the importance and best practices of sustaining and implementing quality assurance programs? At the end of this session, participants will be able to:
a. Understand how to ensure teams are aligned with values of quality assurance b. Discuss methods to improve reliability, accountability, and performance c. Explore methods of measuring and monitoring quality
Learning Outcomes: Participants will increase value and improve performance by designing and or assessing current Quality Assurance strategies that impact overall team and individual accuracy, efficiency, and reliability.
QUALITY ASSURANCE: INCREASING WORKFORCE EFFECTIVENESS, EXPERTISE AND RELIABILITY
D
• At the end of this session, participants will be able to:
a. Understand how to ensure teams are aligned with values of quality assurance (QMS design)
b. Discuss methods to improve reliability, accountability, and performance (LSS CI event strategy)
c. Explore methods of measuring and monitoring quality (Performance Auditing against QP and objectives)
Objectives:
QUALITY ASSURANCE: INCREASING WORKFORCE EFFECTIVENESS, EXPERTISE AND RELIABILITY
D
Dennis Owens J. Anthony Wingate Presenter Bios:
QUALITY ASSURANCE: INCREASING WORKFORCE EFFECTIVENESS, EXPERTISE AND RELIABILITY
J. Anthony Wingate manages the Subsystem and Component Quality Engineering I department at Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico. His organization provides R&D Product Qualification Engineering support to Sandia’s nuclear mission programs. Anthony’s career began as a summer intern at WKM Value Company and Houston Lighting & Power and GE Lexan Plastics. In 1987 he joined prestigious Manufacturing Manage-ment Program (MMP) at GE Lexan Plastics. In 1992 he joined Martin Marietta (now Lockheed Martin) as a process as a process engineer.
In In 1994 he was part of a small group of engineers selected to transfer generator technology from GE located in Pinellas, Fl. to Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) in Albuquerque, NM. While at SNL Mr. Wingate was responsible for quality and product engineering of generator technology. In 2007 he took an assignment as a Lead Project Engineer at Sandia’s Integrated Military Systems Development Center where he was responsible for design, fabrication and deployment of counter-measures on several test. In 2008 he was promoted to manager of the Subsystem and Component Quality Engineering department within the Surety Assessment, Engineering, and Analysis Center.
Mr. Wingate holds a certification in LM21 Lean Six Sigma and has contributed to several high-profile lean events for the Laboratory. He has received numerous awards such as 1998 and 2005 Sandia President’s Quality Awards, Sandia Awards for Excellence, 2005 and 2010 National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Defense Programs Award of Excellence, and is the 2013 BEYA Affirmative Action Award recipient. Mr. Wingate received his Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from Lamar University in Beaumont, TX. [email protected]
Dennis Owens manages the Defense Systems Quality Engineering department at Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) in Albuquerque, New Mexico. His organization provides R&D Systems Engineer-ing, Quality Engineering, and Quality Assurance support to Sandia’s Work for Others (WFO) Depart-ment of Defense projects/programs. Dennis’ career began at GE Aircraft Engines in 1988 in advanced composite fabrication and later turbine component manufacturing. In 1995 he joined Silmax, Inc., a semi-conductor and wafer reclamation company, as a a Quality Engineer. At Silmax, Mr. Owens was responsible for designing and
implementing the quality management system and supplier quality program. In 1999 Mr. Owens joined Allied Signal Power Systems (ASPS) as a Supplier Quality Engineer. At ASPS he was responsible for designing the quality management system and supplier quality programs. In 2001 Mr. Owens joined SNL as a Senior Quality Engineer. At Sandia his career has span from generator technology and software/tester qualification to Advanced Concept and Technology Development (ACTD) programs for Sandia’s Integrated Military Development Center (IMSDC) now Integrated Military Systems (IMS). Mr. Owens holds certifications in internal auditing (RABQSA), and LM21 Lean Six Sigma. From 2005-2007 he authored several articles in the American Society for Quality (ASQ) Quality Progress magazine on quality management, defect analysis, and continuous improvement. He has been invited to speak at NASA and ASQ conferences and is a 2013 BEYA Trailblazer award recipient. Mr. Owens received his Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering Tech-nology from New Mexico State University and a Master's of Arts degree in Organizational Management and Leadership from University of Phoenix. [email protected]
D
Patrice Gregory is a Senior R&D Systems Engineer in the Subsystem and Component Quality Engineering II department at Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Her organization provides R&D Product Qualification Engineering support to Sandia’s nuclear mission programs. Patrice’s career began as a summer intern at NASA Ames Research Center in the Rotorcraft Division, where she was involved in the wind tunnel testing of a quarter scale V-22. She joined Sandia in 2011, where she leads the qualification efforts of magnetics components for various weapon systems. Patrice holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Mathematics from Spelman College, a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology, and Masters of Science and Doctor of Philosophy in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Maryland College Park. She performed her doctoral research on the comparison of interconnect failures of electronic components under rapid loading conditions. [email protected]
QUALITY ASSURANCE: INCREASING WORKFORCE EFFECTIVENESS, EXPERTISE AND RELIABILITY
Patrice Gregory Presenter Bios: D
Expose you to :
a successful approaches in quality management
system (QMS) design and assessment
lean principles to ensure accuracy, efficiency,
and reliability in QMS performance
An Engineer’s perspective of quality applied to
research and development
Why? To help you extract simplicity out of complexity
Our Goal:
QUALITY ASSURANCE: INCREASING WORKFORCE EFFECTIVENESS, EXPERTISE AND RELIABILITY
D
Defect- the lack of something necessary or desirable for
completion or perfection
Designed in Defects- a defect that which can be avoided only
through an alteration or redesign of the item.
Blunder- a stupid, careless, or thoughtless mistake
Waste- anything or process that does not add value to an item
Value- what the customer is buying or willing to pay for
Predictability ( vs. Reliability)-To state, tell about, or make
known in advance, especially on the basis of special
knowledge
Prevention- the action of stopping something from happening
As Quality Professionals we have to first change the way we think (or see) before we can influence others
Definitions:
QUALITY ASSURANCE: INCREASING WORKFORCE EFFECTIVENESS, EXPERTISE AND RELIABILITY
D
2001: NG Production Center and the birth of Lean Six Sigma (LSS)
2010: Surety Assessment, Engineering, and
Analysis Center vision to improve operations Quality
What is the common theme from each of these stories?
Burning Platforms:
Business Platform
LEAN/SIX SIGMA
Tools
No More Budget No Schedule Relief
Minimal Inventory To Meet Schedule Demands
Competition
2007: Integrate Military Systems
Development Centers response to customer
(MDA) request
QUALITY ASSURANCE: INCREASING WORKFORCE EFFECTIVENESS, EXPERTISE AND RELIABILITY
A
Unclassified – Unlimited Release (UUR)
Path to Excellence ISO9001:2008 LSS Project Team Accomplishments
We will describe the case study that yielded the following results: • Project completion, initiation to registration, within 7 months
• Project cost at $150k
• Quality Manual 12 pages in length and completed in 1 day
• Leveraged existing product realization process
• Eliminated legacy documentation waste
• QMS tied to Center strategic planning model
• Approach designed as a cost effective model for use by other organizations within Sandia National Labs
• Project recognized by National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
An intuitive approach to defect prevention is key
Resources to stimulate your thinking
Case Study: Surety Assessment, Engineering and Analysis ISO Project (Sample Documentation): A
QUALITY ASSURANCE: INCREASING WORKFORCE EFFECTIVENESS, EXPERTISE AND RELIABILITY
Understand how to ensure teams are aligned with values of quality assurance:
Management commitment, Manage by walk-around Attendance to staff meeting Direct support to Lean Events
Quality Policy and Quality Management System (QMS) Objectives that touch the critical parts of your business
Clear roles and responsibilities, Clearly defined at all levels through communication Unique review and planning through -out the organization
Requirements, Plan, Implement, Validate Product Realization
QUALITY ASSURANCE: INCREASING WORKFORCE EFFECTIVENESS, EXPERTISE AND RELIABILITY
A
VSA Event Activities Time-Line: (Sample Documentation) A
QUALITY ASSURANCE: INCREASING WORKFORCE EFFECTIVENESS, EXPERTISE AND RELIABILITY
“Switching” on the Light: (Sample Documentation) A
QUALITY ASSURANCE: INCREASING WORKFORCE EFFECTIVENESS, EXPERTISE AND RELIABILITY
• Total Number of Participants:
1 Director, 2 Sr. Managers, 13 Managers, 4
Staff
• Event Cost Estimate:
High: $$
Low: $
Event Cost Estimate: (Sample Documentation) A
QUALITY ASSURANCE: INCREASING WORKFORCE EFFECTIVENESS, EXPERTISE AND RELIABILITY
Discuss methods to improve reliability (predictability), accountability, and performance:
Application of Lean Six Sigma Tools (constraints, considerations, interactions, etc.)
Lean/Six Sigma Training
Well written Charter
Champions/Roles (accountability) Predictability (reliability) Prevention (performance) Sustainability (performance)
QUALITY ASSURANCE: INCREASING WORKFORCE EFFECTIVENESS, EXPERTISE AND RELIABILITY
• Value Stream
• As-is Process
• Input-Process-Output
• Process Flow Diagram
• Quality Function Deployment
• Define CTQ’s
• Cause & Effect
• FMEA
• MSA
Define Process &
Customer Value
Measure Capability to
Meet Customer Needs
• Waste Identification
• Flow Diagrams
• Pull System Analysis
• To-be Process
• Variation
• Process Capability
• Sigma & DPMO Levels
• Value Stream Analysis
• Time Value Mapping
• Cycle Time & Efficiency
Improve & Innovate Process to Meet
Customer Needs
Analyze Process for
Improvement Areas
• Standard Operating Procedures
• SPC
• Process Metrics
• Process Modification
• Brain Storming
• DOE
• Kaizen
• Lean Processes
• Brain Storming
• 6s Applications
• Visual Controls
Control Process and
Sustain Performance
• Mistake Proofing
• Standard Work
Operating
Excellence
P
Communication Defect
EVENT / PROJECT CHARTER (Sample Documentation):
QUALITY ASSURANCE: INCREASING WORKFORCE EFFECTIVENESS, EXPERTISE AND RELIABILITY
A
Champion: Rick Fellerhoff
Stakeholders: Mike Daily, Todd Jones
Team Members: Team #1: Dennis Owens- BB, Marlene Lucero-GB,
•Focus: Quality Manual
Team #2: J. Anthony Wingate-BB, Peggy Rhodes- GB, Ron Farmer, GB
•Focus: Center Related Processes
Team #3: J. Anthony Wingate-BB Dennis Owens- BB, Marlene Lucero & Peggy Rhodes- GB
•Focus: Dept specific operational plans
Preliminary Objectives: 1. Define the end state of the vision for the Center
2. Use ISO9001:2008 and Lean six sigma as tools to define, measure, analyze, improve, and control, operational processes and procedures that are in line with the Center vision, objectives and definitions of Center responsibility and authority throughout NW and WFO.
3. Define the strategy to execute multiple and parallel events in order to achieve registration within 6 months (December 2010)
4. Prove Center is Sandia’s resource with the technical expertise to design and implement cost effective quality management systems in an R&D laboratory environment
5. Recognition as Sandia’s “go-to” organization for QMS consultation
Customer Demand & Constraints: • Perceived understanding and value of ISO and Lean within the Center
• Industry Standard - ANSI/ISO/ASQ Q9001-2008
• Center:
• Website, Operational processes, Procedures, and Value propositions
• Vision, Objectives, Policy and VP memos
Process Information:
Event / Project Dates: Team 1 (July 2010), Team 2 (Aug 2010), Team 3 (Sept 2010)
Event/ Project Description: ISO 9001:2008 Registration
EVENT / PROJECT CHARTER
Value Stream Tie and/or Business Objective Tie: • Improve Center management practices
• Teach other Sandia organizations how to improve
• Paul Hommert Vision
Return on Investment: • Efficient, effective , and measureable operational
protocols for the Center
• 12300 Recognized as the Center of Excellence of NWC Quality in the area of Assessments and Engineered solutions
What management needs to understand in order to act
• Rule #1: the audit process objectives should only focus on determining the effectiveness of the quality policy statement and business objectives through cause and effect (e.g. the causal analysis chain of events)
• Rule #2: the audit process should report how/if “the system” is operating as an integrated unit
Design Defect
Talking Defect
Hearing Defect
Barrier Defect
WIFM (What’s In It For Me) Defect
N/C
What audit
finds
Communication Defect
+ Manpower Materials Machine
Measurement Methods Mother Nature (Environment)
Value/Goal
Explore methods of measuring and monitoring quality :
QUALITY ASSURANCE: INCREASING WORKFORCE EFFECTIVENESS, EXPERTISE AND RELIABILITY
6 “M’s”
D
What we want you to take away (golden nuggets) If you are a senior level leader, design and communicate your quality
vision in terms of an integrated system. Insist your audit program focus analyzes that vision and is based on value(or things your willing to pay for).
If you’re a line level leader, integrate the process of quality into your regular routine and communicate this often at your staff meetings as an expectation of performance.
If you're a staff member, show your commitment to your leadership’s vision by taking the time to understand your quality assurance program and be vocal about its value to your job. This will help us find the disconnects.
Flip the Script
Quality improvement is a journey, not a destination therefore, measure your successes and challenges with a “next steps” mentality.
Summary:
QUALITY ASSURANCE: INCREASING WORKFORCE EFFECTIVENESS, EXPERTISE AND RELIABILITY
D
• You should now be able to: a. Understand how to ensure teams are aligned with
values of quality assurance (QMS design)
b. Discuss methods to improve reliability, accountability, and performance (LSS CI event strategy)
c. Explore methods of measuring and monitoring quality (Performance Auditing against QP and objectives)
Objectives:
QUALITY ASSURANCE: INCREASING WORKFORCE EFFECTIVENESS, EXPERTISE AND RELIABILITY
D
Questions?
QUALITY ASSURANCE: INCREASING WORKFORCE EFFECTIVENESS, EXPERTISE AND RELIABILITY