2013-2014 Review2014-2015 Planning

Faribault Public Schools

DATA DAY

RATING SYSTEMS

RATING SYSTEM

• MMR = multiple measurement rating– percentage of points earned in each category:

proficiency, student growth, achievement gap reduction, and graduation rates (HS only)

• FR = focus rating– combining the proficiency and growth of the

seven subgroups for which there is an achievement gap (Black, Hispanic, Asian, American Indian, Free/Reduced Price Lunch, Special Education, and English Learners)

MMR

• 4 Categories– Proficiency (25 points)– Growth (25 points)– Achievement Gap Reduction (25 points)

• Elementary/Middle School Total = 75 points

– Graduation (25 points) **High School only

• High School Total = 100 points

Focus Rating

• 2 Categories– Focused Proficiency (25 points)– Achievement Gap Reduction (25 points)

How MDE Identifies Schools

NEW RATING SYSTEM

• Reward– highest-performing 15% of Title I schools in the state / MMR (yearly)

• Celebration– roughly defined as the next 10% (yearly)

• Continuous Improvement– Roughly defined as the bottom 25% AND not Focus or Priority; plan similar to

AYP but with more flexibility and completed at the district level without MDE support; plan does not need to be submitted to MDE but needs to be available at the request of MDE (yearly)

• Focus– 10% of Title I schools making the biggest contribution to the state’s

achievement gap and high schools with graduation rates of less than 60% / lowest FR or grad rate (every 3 years)

• Priority– 5 % most-persistently low-performing schools in the state / SIG or lowest

MMR (every 3 years)

Calculations of Each Group

• Proficiency– Measure of students that are proficient on standardized assessments– Based on weighted subgroups – Based on existing AYP marks

• Growth– Average of standardized growth obtained from same test year to year

• Achievement Gap Reduction– Difference in growth scores for targeted subgroups with statewide

average growth of non-targeted subgroups• Graduation

– Uses existing AYP marks to determine what subgroups are meeting graduation targets

Achievement Gap Reduction Calculations

• The comparisons use the following:– Indian average compared to statewide White average– Asian average compared to statewide White average– Hispanic average compared to statewide White average– Black average compared to statewide White average– LEP average compared to statewide non-LEP average– Special Education average compared to statewide non-Special

Education average– FRP average compared to statewide non-FRP average

Jefferson Lincoln Roosevelt Faribault Middle School Faribault High School0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

28.63%

42.35% 40.55%

21.83%

81.27%

MMR - By School

Jefferson Lincoln Roosevelt0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

28.00%

46.73%

30.73%

Focus Rating - By School

Score Breakdown

Proficiency GrowthAchievement Gap Reduction Graduation Total

Faribault High School 15.35 20.26 20.66 25 81.27

Faribault Middle School 0 8.98 7.39 21.83

Jefferson Elementary 4.7 6.95 9.83 28.63

Lincoln Elementary 13.15 9.88 8.74 42.35

Roosevelt Elementary 3.23 13.62 13.55 40.55

FAQ on EL Results

1) Why are EL scores so low?A = EL students by definition are not proficient….. in language.

2) How can we improve our EL scores if they are not proficient by definition?A = The state counts EL students who have reached proficiency and exited service for an additional 2 years.

3) What data can help me determine language proficiency?A = Use the WIDA ACCESS data. • This will tell you students language proficiency level.• EL Teachers at your school will have more in depth knowledge about your students language ability and

acculturation history.

4) How do I move students towards proficiency?A = Move level 4 students to level 5. ***This does not mean forget about your lower level students.

MATH

Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards

28.1%

23.8%

31.6%

16.5%

27.4%

22.1%

35.5%

14.9%

District Performance - MCA Math

12-13 13-14

Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards

64.2%

22.2%

12.6%

1.1%

64.8%

21.3%

11.5%

2.4%

District Performance - MCA MathEL Students

12-13 13-14

Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards

19.5%

24.2%

36.1%

20.1%18.5%

22.3%

41.3%

18.0%

District Performance - MCA MathNon-EL Students

12-13 13-14

Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards

38.4%

25.8%28.1%

7.8%

38.0%

24.8%

29.2%

8.0%

District Performance - MCA MathFRP Students

12-13 13-14

Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards

14.5%

21.3%

36.3%

27.9%

13.3%

18.6%

44.0%

24.2%

District Performance - MCA MathNon-FRP Students

12-13 13-14

Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards

63.9%

22.3%

12.7%

1.1%

64.0%

21.8%

11.7%

2.5%

District Performance - MCA MathEL & FRP

12-13 13-14

2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-20140.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

MCA Math Proficiency - Ethnicity

American IndianAsianBlackHispanicWhite

2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-20140.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

MCA Math Proficiency

F/RNon-F/R

2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-20140.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

MCA Math Proficiency

ELNon-EL

2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-20140.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

MCA Math Proficiency

Special EdNon-Special Ed

2012 2013 2014

FPS 0.686 0.594 0.61

State 0.756 0.715 0.719

5.0%

15.0%

25.0%

35.0%

45.0%

55.0%

65.0%

75.0%

85.0%

95.0%

MCA Math Proficiency - Grade 3

Jefferson Lincoln Roosevelt

2012 0.663 0.711 0.682

2013 0.567 0.704 0.516

2014 0.5 0.716 0.662

5.0%

15.0%

25.0%

35.0%

45.0%

55.0%

65.0%

75.0%

85.0%

95.0%

MCA Math Proficiency - Grade 3

2012 2013 2014

FPS 0.703 0.64 0.58

State 0.733 0.712 0.703

5.0%

15.0%

25.0%

35.0%

45.0%

55.0%

65.0%

75.0%

85.0%

95.0%

MCA Math Proficiency - Grade 4

Jefferson Lincoln Roosevelt

2012 0.649 0.785 0.682

2013 0.706 0.674 0.566

2014 0.562 0.602 0.581

5.0%

15.0%

25.0%

35.0%

45.0%

55.0%

65.0%

75.0%

85.0%

95.0%

MCA Math Proficiency - Grade 4

2012 2013 2014

FPS 0.546 0.452 0.527

State 0.615 0.591 0.609

5.0%

15.0%

25.0%

35.0%

45.0%

55.0%

65.0%

75.0%

85.0%

95.0%

MCA Math Proficiency - Grade 5

2012 2013 2014

Jefferson 0.525 0.448 0.506

Lincoln 0.515 0.473 0.529

Roosevelt 0.604 0.435 0.56

5.0%

15.0%

25.0%

35.0%

45.0%

55.0%

65.0%

75.0%

85.0%

95.0%

MCA Math Proficiency - Grade 5

2012 2013 2014

FPS 0.453 0.397 0.384

State 0.588 0.559 0.561

5.0%

15.0%

25.0%

35.0%

45.0%

55.0%

65.0%

75.0%

85.0%

95.0%

MCA Math Proficiency - Grade 6

2012 2013 2014

FPS 0.354 0.35 0.392

State 0.572 0.543 0.556

5.0%

15.0%

25.0%

35.0%

45.0%

55.0%

65.0%

75.0%

85.0%

95.0%

MCA Math Proficiency - Grade 7

2012 2013 2014

FPS 0.587 0.434 0.546

State 0.607 0.573 0.582

5.0%

15.0%

25.0%

35.0%

45.0%

55.0%

65.0%

75.0%

85.0%

95.0%

MCA Math Proficiency - Grade 8

Middle School Proficiency Levels

6th Grade 12-13 6th Grade 13-14 7th Grade 12-13 7th Grade 13-14 8th Grade 12-13 8th Grade 13-14

Did Not Meet Standards

0.355172413793103 0.373702422145329 0.296666666666667 0.332155477031802 0.275641025641026 0.218543046357616

Partially Met Standards

0.248275862068966 0.242214532871972 0.353333333333333 0.275618374558304 0.278846153846154 0.235099337748344

Met Standards 0.310344827586207 0.28719723183391 0.253333333333333 0.318021201413428 0.275641025641026 0.380794701986755

Exceeded Stan-dards

0.0862068965517241

0.0968858131487889

0.0966666666666667

0.0742049469964664

0.169871794871795 0.165562913907285

***Unofficial

2012 2013 2014

FPS 0.479 0.532 0.549

State 0.425 0.524 NaN

5.0%

15.0%

25.0%

35.0%

45.0%

55.0%

65.0%

75.0%

85.0%

95.0%

MCA Math Proficiency -Grade 11

Strand Data

**Strand data is a percentage of points earned, not proficiency

Algebra Strand Geometry Strand Data Analysis & Probability Strand

Grade 11 54.1% 55.4% 54.7%

READING

Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards

34.0%

21.5%

33.9%

10.6%

31.3%

22.6%

35.1%

10.9%

District Performance - MCA Reading

12-13 13-14

Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards

75.2%

16.7%

7.8%

0.3%

73.4%

18.4%

7.7%

0.5%

District Performance - MCA ReadingEL Students

12-13 13-14

Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards

24.6%22.5%

39.9%

12.9%

21.6%23.6%

41.4%

13.3%

District Performance - MCA ReadingNon-EL Students

12-13 13-14

Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards

46.6%

21.0%

26.9%

5.4%

42.0%

24.0%

27.8%

6.2%

District Performance - MCA ReadingFRP Students

12-13 13-14

Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards

17.9%

22.0%

42.9%

17.1%17.3%

20.9%

44.7%

17.1%

District Performance - MCA ReadingNon - FRP Students

12-13 13-14

Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards

75.4%

16.2%

8.1%

0.3%

73.8%

17.6%

8.1%

0.6%

District Performance - MCA ReadingEL & FRP

12-13 13-14

2012 2013 (MCA III) 2014

FPS 0.621 0.445 0.461

State 0.753 0.576 0.588

5.0%

15.0%

25.0%

35.0%

45.0%

55.0%

65.0%

75.0%

85.0%

95.0%

MCA Reading Proficiency District

2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-20140.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

MCA Reading Proficiency - Ethnicity

American IndianAsianBlackHispanicWhite

2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-20140.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

MCA Reading Proficiency

F/RNon-F/R

2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-20140.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

MCA Reading Proficiency

ELNon-EL

2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-20140.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

MCA Reading Proficiency

Special EdNon-Special Ed

2012 2013 (MCA III) 2014

FPS 0.658 0.473 0.461

State 0.803 0.574 0.582

5.0%

15.0%

25.0%

35.0%

45.0%

55.0%

65.0%

75.0%

85.0%

95.0%

MCA Reading Proficiency - Grade 3

2012 2013 (MCA III) 2014

Jefferson 0.733 0.416 0.526

Lincoln 0.689 0.592 0.543

Roosevelt 0.574 0.413 0.299

5.0%

15.0%

25.0%

35.0%

45.0%

55.0%

65.0%

75.0%

85.0%

95.0%

MCA Reading Proficiency - Grade 3

2012 2013 (MCA III) 2014

FPS 0.643 0.421 0.466

State 0.753 0.54 0.552

5.0%

15.0%

25.0%

35.0%

45.0%

55.0%

65.0%

75.0%

85.0%

95.0%

MCA Reading Proficiency - Grade 4

2012 2013 (MCA III) 2014

Jefferson 0.628 0.53 0.402

Lincoln 0.714 0.412 0.553

Roosevelt 0.587 0.346 0.442

5.0%

15.0%

25.0%

35.0%

45.0%

55.0%

65.0%

75.0%

85.0%

95.0%

MCA Reading Proficiency - Grade 4

2012 2013 (MCA III) 2014

FPS 0.673 0.529 0.516

State 0.78 0.631 0.67

5.0%

15.0%

25.0%

35.0%

45.0%

55.0%

65.0%

75.0%

85.0%

95.0%

MCA Reading Proficiency - Grade 5

2012 2013 (MCA III) 2014

Jefferson 0.586 0.537 0.482

Lincoln 0.673 0.648 0.563

Roosevelt 0.771 0.402 0.51

5.0%

15.0%

25.0%

35.0%

45.0%

55.0%

65.0%

75.0%

85.0%

95.0%

MCA Reading Proficiency - Grade 5

2012 2013 (MCA III) 2014

FPS 0.604 0.418 0.43

State 0.75 0.588 0.603

5.0%

15.0%

25.0%

35.0%

45.0%

55.0%

65.0%

75.0%

85.0%

95.0%

MCA Reading Proficiency - Grade 6

2012 2013 (MCA III) 2014

FPS 0.558 0.371 0.418

State 0.706 0.539 0.558

5.0%

15.0%

25.0%

35.0%

45.0%

55.0%

65.0%

75.0%

85.0%

95.0%

MCA Reading Proficiency - Grade 7

2012 2013 (MCA III) 2014

FPS 0.556 0.363 0.407

State 0.717 0.538 0.556

5.0%

15.0%

25.0%

35.0%

45.0%

55.0%

65.0%

75.0%

85.0%

95.0%

MCA Reading Proficiency - Grade 8

Middle School Proficiency Levels

6th Grade 12-13 6th Grade 13-14 7th Grade 12-13 7th Grade 13-14 8th Grade 12-13 8th Grade 13-14

Did Not Meet Standards

0.369337979094077 0.318181818181818 0.380794701986755 0.368794326241135 0.419254658385093 0.323333333333333

Partially Met Standards

0.212543554006969 0.251748251748252 0.248344370860927 0.212765957446809 0.217391304347826 0.27

Met Standards 0.299651567944251 0.29020979020979 0.288079470198675 0.329787234042553 0.273291925465839 0.293333333333333

Exceeded Stan-dards

0.118466898954704 0.13986013986014 0.0827814569536424

0.0886524822695036

0.0900621118012422

0.113333333333333

2012 2013 2014

FHS 0.678 0.562 0.545

State 0.764 0.622 0.6

5.0%

15.0%

25.0%

35.0%

45.0%

55.0%

65.0%

75.0%

85.0%

95.0%

MCA Reading Proficiency - Grade 10

SCIENCE

Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards

37.2%

26.8%

29.2%

6.8%

34.4%

28.8%31.0%

5.8%

District Performance - MCA Science

12-13 13-14

Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards

76.7%

19.8%

3.4%0.0%

80.6%

18.5%

0.8% 0.0%

District Performance - MCA Science EL Students

12-13 13-14

Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards

30.0%28.5%

35.1%

6.4%

26.6%

30.5%

36.1%

6.8%

District Performance - MCA ScienceNon-EL Students

12-13 13-14

Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards

53.0%

25.3%

19.9%

1.8%

47.5%

29.0%

19.6%

3.9%

District Performance - MCA Science FRP Students

12-13 13-14

Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards

19.1%

29.5%

42.1%

9.2%

21.1%

28.6%

42.6%

7.7%

District Performance - MCA Science Non-FRP Students

12-13 13-14

Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards

77.5%

18.9%

3.6%0.0%

80.0%

19.1%

0.9% 0.0%

District Performance - MCA ScienceEL & FRP

12-13 13-14

2012 2013 2014

FPS 0.373 0.368 0.368

State 0.505 0.521 0.532

5.0%

15.0%

25.0%

35.0%

45.0%

55.0%

65.0%

75.0%

85.0%

95.0%

MCA Science ProficiencyDistrict

2012 2013 2014

FPS 0.419 0.426 0.447

State 0.577 0.597 0.612

5.0%

15.0%

25.0%

35.0%

45.0%

55.0%

65.0%

75.0%

85.0%

95.0%

MCA Science Proficiency5th Grade

2012 2013 2014

FPS 0.297 0.271 0.27

State 0.419 0.438 0.449

5.0%

15.0%

25.0%

35.0%

45.0%

55.0%

65.0%

75.0%

85.0%

95.0%

MCA Science Proficiency8th Grade

2012 2013 2014

FPS 0.401 0.418 0.39

State 0.517 0.53 0.532

5.0%

15.0%

25.0%

35.0%

45.0%

55.0%

65.0%

75.0%

85.0%

95.0%

MCA Science ProficiencyHigh School

2010-11 2011-12 2012-130.00%

20.00%

40.00%

60.00%

80.00%

100.00%

Graduation Rate - ISD 656

Analyzing Proficiency

Observe data patterns What are your data findings? What are you noticing as you dig through your building’s data? How does that compare to the district and state data?

Write your findings on the flip chart.

73

Digging Deeper into your Strand Data

• Observe and discuss the data patterns you see, noting comparisons.

• Document strong and weak strands and achievement gaps on the flip chart.

Analyzing Proficiency

Pose Hypotheses of Practice (HOPS) Explore and record on the flip chart

possible explanations for your building’s strength and weakness.

75

Classroom Connections

Suggest strategies that might improve these results.

76

Articulating the VisionWhat is it about this concern that we hope to change?

Specify the Concern

What subject area?

Which grade levels?

Which specific skills?

Assessed how?

77

SMART GOAL• S – Specific – What do you want to measure?• M – Measurable – How will the goal be measured?• A – Attainable – Is it a reachable goal?• R – Results-oriented – How will the goal look

when it is reached?

• T – Time-Bound – What is the timeline for reaching the goal?

SMART Goal

• By June 2014, 75% of free and reduced students will demonstrate proficiency in reading on the MCA Reading Assessment.

80

Crafting the Goal

Use the template to craft the goal as a team.

(specific skills)

(subgroups or grade levels of students)

(percent of students)

proficiency

MCA II

Spring, 2011

Staff who will do the work

Commitment

We will

of

so that

will demonstrate

as measured by

by

Sample SMART Reading Goal

We, the teaching staff at Johnson Middle School will improve students’ skills in vocabulary and comprehension in all content areas for all 6th, 7th and 8th grade students so that 85% show proficiency or above, while accelerating the performance of special education students so that 65% show proficient levels on the MCA II reading assessments given in May, 2013.

81

THE END