![Page 1: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
2013-2014 Review2014-2015 Planning
Faribault Public Schools
DATA DAY
![Page 2: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
RATING SYSTEMS
![Page 3: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
RATING SYSTEM
• MMR = multiple measurement rating– percentage of points earned in each category:
proficiency, student growth, achievement gap reduction, and graduation rates (HS only)
• FR = focus rating– combining the proficiency and growth of the
seven subgroups for which there is an achievement gap (Black, Hispanic, Asian, American Indian, Free/Reduced Price Lunch, Special Education, and English Learners)
![Page 4: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
MMR
• 4 Categories– Proficiency (25 points)– Growth (25 points)– Achievement Gap Reduction (25 points)
• Elementary/Middle School Total = 75 points
– Graduation (25 points) **High School only
• High School Total = 100 points
![Page 5: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Focus Rating
• 2 Categories– Focused Proficiency (25 points)– Achievement Gap Reduction (25 points)
![Page 6: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
How MDE Identifies Schools
![Page 7: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
NEW RATING SYSTEM
• Reward– highest-performing 15% of Title I schools in the state / MMR (yearly)
• Celebration– roughly defined as the next 10% (yearly)
• Continuous Improvement– Roughly defined as the bottom 25% AND not Focus or Priority; plan similar to
AYP but with more flexibility and completed at the district level without MDE support; plan does not need to be submitted to MDE but needs to be available at the request of MDE (yearly)
• Focus– 10% of Title I schools making the biggest contribution to the state’s
achievement gap and high schools with graduation rates of less than 60% / lowest FR or grad rate (every 3 years)
• Priority– 5 % most-persistently low-performing schools in the state / SIG or lowest
MMR (every 3 years)
![Page 8: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Calculations of Each Group
• Proficiency– Measure of students that are proficient on standardized assessments– Based on weighted subgroups – Based on existing AYP marks
• Growth– Average of standardized growth obtained from same test year to year
• Achievement Gap Reduction– Difference in growth scores for targeted subgroups with statewide
average growth of non-targeted subgroups• Graduation
– Uses existing AYP marks to determine what subgroups are meeting graduation targets
![Page 9: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Achievement Gap Reduction Calculations
• The comparisons use the following:– Indian average compared to statewide White average– Asian average compared to statewide White average– Hispanic average compared to statewide White average– Black average compared to statewide White average– LEP average compared to statewide non-LEP average– Special Education average compared to statewide non-Special
Education average– FRP average compared to statewide non-FRP average
![Page 10: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Jefferson Lincoln Roosevelt Faribault Middle School Faribault High School0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
28.63%
42.35% 40.55%
21.83%
81.27%
MMR - By School
![Page 11: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Jefferson Lincoln Roosevelt0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
28.00%
46.73%
30.73%
Focus Rating - By School
![Page 12: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Score Breakdown
Proficiency GrowthAchievement Gap Reduction Graduation Total
Faribault High School 15.35 20.26 20.66 25 81.27
Faribault Middle School 0 8.98 7.39 21.83
Jefferson Elementary 4.7 6.95 9.83 28.63
Lincoln Elementary 13.15 9.88 8.74 42.35
Roosevelt Elementary 3.23 13.62 13.55 40.55
![Page 13: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
FAQ on EL Results
1) Why are EL scores so low?A = EL students by definition are not proficient….. in language.
2) How can we improve our EL scores if they are not proficient by definition?A = The state counts EL students who have reached proficiency and exited service for an additional 2 years.
3) What data can help me determine language proficiency?A = Use the WIDA ACCESS data. • This will tell you students language proficiency level.• EL Teachers at your school will have more in depth knowledge about your students language ability and
acculturation history.
4) How do I move students towards proficiency?A = Move level 4 students to level 5. ***This does not mean forget about your lower level students.
![Page 14: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
![Page 15: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
MATH
![Page 16: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards
28.1%
23.8%
31.6%
16.5%
27.4%
22.1%
35.5%
14.9%
District Performance - MCA Math
12-13 13-14
![Page 17: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards
64.2%
22.2%
12.6%
1.1%
64.8%
21.3%
11.5%
2.4%
District Performance - MCA MathEL Students
12-13 13-14
![Page 18: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards
19.5%
24.2%
36.1%
20.1%18.5%
22.3%
41.3%
18.0%
District Performance - MCA MathNon-EL Students
12-13 13-14
![Page 19: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards
38.4%
25.8%28.1%
7.8%
38.0%
24.8%
29.2%
8.0%
District Performance - MCA MathFRP Students
12-13 13-14
![Page 20: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards
14.5%
21.3%
36.3%
27.9%
13.3%
18.6%
44.0%
24.2%
District Performance - MCA MathNon-FRP Students
12-13 13-14
![Page 21: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards
63.9%
22.3%
12.7%
1.1%
64.0%
21.8%
11.7%
2.5%
District Performance - MCA MathEL & FRP
12-13 13-14
![Page 22: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-20140.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
MCA Math Proficiency - Ethnicity
American IndianAsianBlackHispanicWhite
![Page 23: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-20140.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
MCA Math Proficiency
F/RNon-F/R
![Page 24: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-20140.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
MCA Math Proficiency
ELNon-EL
![Page 25: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-20140.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
MCA Math Proficiency
Special EdNon-Special Ed
![Page 26: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
2012 2013 2014
FPS 0.686 0.594 0.61
State 0.756 0.715 0.719
5.0%
15.0%
25.0%
35.0%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
75.0%
85.0%
95.0%
MCA Math Proficiency - Grade 3
![Page 27: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Jefferson Lincoln Roosevelt
2012 0.663 0.711 0.682
2013 0.567 0.704 0.516
2014 0.5 0.716 0.662
5.0%
15.0%
25.0%
35.0%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
75.0%
85.0%
95.0%
MCA Math Proficiency - Grade 3
![Page 28: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
2012 2013 2014
FPS 0.703 0.64 0.58
State 0.733 0.712 0.703
5.0%
15.0%
25.0%
35.0%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
75.0%
85.0%
95.0%
MCA Math Proficiency - Grade 4
![Page 29: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Jefferson Lincoln Roosevelt
2012 0.649 0.785 0.682
2013 0.706 0.674 0.566
2014 0.562 0.602 0.581
5.0%
15.0%
25.0%
35.0%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
75.0%
85.0%
95.0%
MCA Math Proficiency - Grade 4
![Page 30: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
2012 2013 2014
FPS 0.546 0.452 0.527
State 0.615 0.591 0.609
5.0%
15.0%
25.0%
35.0%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
75.0%
85.0%
95.0%
MCA Math Proficiency - Grade 5
![Page 31: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
2012 2013 2014
Jefferson 0.525 0.448 0.506
Lincoln 0.515 0.473 0.529
Roosevelt 0.604 0.435 0.56
5.0%
15.0%
25.0%
35.0%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
75.0%
85.0%
95.0%
MCA Math Proficiency - Grade 5
![Page 32: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
2012 2013 2014
FPS 0.453 0.397 0.384
State 0.588 0.559 0.561
5.0%
15.0%
25.0%
35.0%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
75.0%
85.0%
95.0%
MCA Math Proficiency - Grade 6
![Page 33: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
2012 2013 2014
FPS 0.354 0.35 0.392
State 0.572 0.543 0.556
5.0%
15.0%
25.0%
35.0%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
75.0%
85.0%
95.0%
MCA Math Proficiency - Grade 7
![Page 34: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
2012 2013 2014
FPS 0.587 0.434 0.546
State 0.607 0.573 0.582
5.0%
15.0%
25.0%
35.0%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
75.0%
85.0%
95.0%
MCA Math Proficiency - Grade 8
![Page 35: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Middle School Proficiency Levels
6th Grade 12-13 6th Grade 13-14 7th Grade 12-13 7th Grade 13-14 8th Grade 12-13 8th Grade 13-14
Did Not Meet Standards
0.355172413793103 0.373702422145329 0.296666666666667 0.332155477031802 0.275641025641026 0.218543046357616
Partially Met Standards
0.248275862068966 0.242214532871972 0.353333333333333 0.275618374558304 0.278846153846154 0.235099337748344
Met Standards 0.310344827586207 0.28719723183391 0.253333333333333 0.318021201413428 0.275641025641026 0.380794701986755
Exceeded Stan-dards
0.0862068965517241
0.0968858131487889
0.0966666666666667
0.0742049469964664
0.169871794871795 0.165562913907285
![Page 36: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
***Unofficial
2012 2013 2014
FPS 0.479 0.532 0.549
State 0.425 0.524 NaN
5.0%
15.0%
25.0%
35.0%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
75.0%
85.0%
95.0%
MCA Math Proficiency -Grade 11
![Page 37: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Strand Data
**Strand data is a percentage of points earned, not proficiency
Algebra Strand Geometry Strand Data Analysis & Probability Strand
Grade 11 54.1% 55.4% 54.7%
![Page 38: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
READING
![Page 39: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards
34.0%
21.5%
33.9%
10.6%
31.3%
22.6%
35.1%
10.9%
District Performance - MCA Reading
12-13 13-14
![Page 40: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards
75.2%
16.7%
7.8%
0.3%
73.4%
18.4%
7.7%
0.5%
District Performance - MCA ReadingEL Students
12-13 13-14
![Page 41: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards
24.6%22.5%
39.9%
12.9%
21.6%23.6%
41.4%
13.3%
District Performance - MCA ReadingNon-EL Students
12-13 13-14
![Page 42: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards
46.6%
21.0%
26.9%
5.4%
42.0%
24.0%
27.8%
6.2%
District Performance - MCA ReadingFRP Students
12-13 13-14
![Page 43: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards
17.9%
22.0%
42.9%
17.1%17.3%
20.9%
44.7%
17.1%
District Performance - MCA ReadingNon - FRP Students
12-13 13-14
![Page 44: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards
75.4%
16.2%
8.1%
0.3%
73.8%
17.6%
8.1%
0.6%
District Performance - MCA ReadingEL & FRP
12-13 13-14
![Page 45: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
2012 2013 (MCA III) 2014
FPS 0.621 0.445 0.461
State 0.753 0.576 0.588
5.0%
15.0%
25.0%
35.0%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
75.0%
85.0%
95.0%
MCA Reading Proficiency District
![Page 46: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-20140.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
MCA Reading Proficiency - Ethnicity
American IndianAsianBlackHispanicWhite
![Page 47: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-20140.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
MCA Reading Proficiency
F/RNon-F/R
![Page 48: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-20140.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
MCA Reading Proficiency
ELNon-EL
![Page 49: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-20140.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
MCA Reading Proficiency
Special EdNon-Special Ed
![Page 50: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
2012 2013 (MCA III) 2014
FPS 0.658 0.473 0.461
State 0.803 0.574 0.582
5.0%
15.0%
25.0%
35.0%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
75.0%
85.0%
95.0%
MCA Reading Proficiency - Grade 3
![Page 51: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
2012 2013 (MCA III) 2014
Jefferson 0.733 0.416 0.526
Lincoln 0.689 0.592 0.543
Roosevelt 0.574 0.413 0.299
5.0%
15.0%
25.0%
35.0%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
75.0%
85.0%
95.0%
MCA Reading Proficiency - Grade 3
![Page 52: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
2012 2013 (MCA III) 2014
FPS 0.643 0.421 0.466
State 0.753 0.54 0.552
5.0%
15.0%
25.0%
35.0%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
75.0%
85.0%
95.0%
MCA Reading Proficiency - Grade 4
![Page 53: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
2012 2013 (MCA III) 2014
Jefferson 0.628 0.53 0.402
Lincoln 0.714 0.412 0.553
Roosevelt 0.587 0.346 0.442
5.0%
15.0%
25.0%
35.0%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
75.0%
85.0%
95.0%
MCA Reading Proficiency - Grade 4
![Page 54: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
2012 2013 (MCA III) 2014
FPS 0.673 0.529 0.516
State 0.78 0.631 0.67
5.0%
15.0%
25.0%
35.0%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
75.0%
85.0%
95.0%
MCA Reading Proficiency - Grade 5
![Page 55: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
2012 2013 (MCA III) 2014
Jefferson 0.586 0.537 0.482
Lincoln 0.673 0.648 0.563
Roosevelt 0.771 0.402 0.51
5.0%
15.0%
25.0%
35.0%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
75.0%
85.0%
95.0%
MCA Reading Proficiency - Grade 5
![Page 56: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
2012 2013 (MCA III) 2014
FPS 0.604 0.418 0.43
State 0.75 0.588 0.603
5.0%
15.0%
25.0%
35.0%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
75.0%
85.0%
95.0%
MCA Reading Proficiency - Grade 6
![Page 57: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
2012 2013 (MCA III) 2014
FPS 0.558 0.371 0.418
State 0.706 0.539 0.558
5.0%
15.0%
25.0%
35.0%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
75.0%
85.0%
95.0%
MCA Reading Proficiency - Grade 7
![Page 58: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
2012 2013 (MCA III) 2014
FPS 0.556 0.363 0.407
State 0.717 0.538 0.556
5.0%
15.0%
25.0%
35.0%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
75.0%
85.0%
95.0%
MCA Reading Proficiency - Grade 8
![Page 59: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Middle School Proficiency Levels
6th Grade 12-13 6th Grade 13-14 7th Grade 12-13 7th Grade 13-14 8th Grade 12-13 8th Grade 13-14
Did Not Meet Standards
0.369337979094077 0.318181818181818 0.380794701986755 0.368794326241135 0.419254658385093 0.323333333333333
Partially Met Standards
0.212543554006969 0.251748251748252 0.248344370860927 0.212765957446809 0.217391304347826 0.27
Met Standards 0.299651567944251 0.29020979020979 0.288079470198675 0.329787234042553 0.273291925465839 0.293333333333333
Exceeded Stan-dards
0.118466898954704 0.13986013986014 0.0827814569536424
0.0886524822695036
0.0900621118012422
0.113333333333333
![Page 60: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
2012 2013 2014
FHS 0.678 0.562 0.545
State 0.764 0.622 0.6
5.0%
15.0%
25.0%
35.0%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
75.0%
85.0%
95.0%
MCA Reading Proficiency - Grade 10
![Page 61: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
SCIENCE
![Page 62: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards
37.2%
26.8%
29.2%
6.8%
34.4%
28.8%31.0%
5.8%
District Performance - MCA Science
12-13 13-14
![Page 63: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards
76.7%
19.8%
3.4%0.0%
80.6%
18.5%
0.8% 0.0%
District Performance - MCA Science EL Students
12-13 13-14
![Page 64: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards
30.0%28.5%
35.1%
6.4%
26.6%
30.5%
36.1%
6.8%
District Performance - MCA ScienceNon-EL Students
12-13 13-14
![Page 65: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards
53.0%
25.3%
19.9%
1.8%
47.5%
29.0%
19.6%
3.9%
District Performance - MCA Science FRP Students
12-13 13-14
![Page 66: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards
19.1%
29.5%
42.1%
9.2%
21.1%
28.6%
42.6%
7.7%
District Performance - MCA Science Non-FRP Students
12-13 13-14
![Page 67: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Did Not Meet Standards Partially Met Standards Met Standards Exceeded Standards
77.5%
18.9%
3.6%0.0%
80.0%
19.1%
0.9% 0.0%
District Performance - MCA ScienceEL & FRP
12-13 13-14
![Page 68: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
2012 2013 2014
FPS 0.373 0.368 0.368
State 0.505 0.521 0.532
5.0%
15.0%
25.0%
35.0%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
75.0%
85.0%
95.0%
MCA Science ProficiencyDistrict
![Page 69: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
2012 2013 2014
FPS 0.419 0.426 0.447
State 0.577 0.597 0.612
5.0%
15.0%
25.0%
35.0%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
75.0%
85.0%
95.0%
MCA Science Proficiency5th Grade
![Page 70: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
2012 2013 2014
FPS 0.297 0.271 0.27
State 0.419 0.438 0.449
5.0%
15.0%
25.0%
35.0%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
75.0%
85.0%
95.0%
MCA Science Proficiency8th Grade
![Page 71: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
2012 2013 2014
FPS 0.401 0.418 0.39
State 0.517 0.53 0.532
5.0%
15.0%
25.0%
35.0%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
75.0%
85.0%
95.0%
MCA Science ProficiencyHigh School
![Page 72: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
2010-11 2011-12 2012-130.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
100.00%
Graduation Rate - ISD 656
![Page 73: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Analyzing Proficiency
Observe data patterns What are your data findings? What are you noticing as you dig through your building’s data? How does that compare to the district and state data?
Write your findings on the flip chart.
73
![Page 74: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Digging Deeper into your Strand Data
• Observe and discuss the data patterns you see, noting comparisons.
• Document strong and weak strands and achievement gaps on the flip chart.
![Page 75: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
Analyzing Proficiency
Pose Hypotheses of Practice (HOPS) Explore and record on the flip chart
possible explanations for your building’s strength and weakness.
75
![Page 76: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Classroom Connections
Suggest strategies that might improve these results.
76
![Page 77: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
Articulating the VisionWhat is it about this concern that we hope to change?
Specify the Concern
What subject area?
Which grade levels?
Which specific skills?
Assessed how?
77
![Page 78: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
SMART GOAL• S – Specific – What do you want to measure?• M – Measurable – How will the goal be measured?• A – Attainable – Is it a reachable goal?• R – Results-oriented – How will the goal look
when it is reached?
• T – Time-Bound – What is the timeline for reaching the goal?
![Page 79: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
SMART Goal
• By June 2014, 75% of free and reduced students will demonstrate proficiency in reading on the MCA Reading Assessment.
![Page 80: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
80
Crafting the Goal
Use the template to craft the goal as a team.
(specific skills)
(subgroups or grade levels of students)
(percent of students)
proficiency
MCA II
Spring, 2011
Staff who will do the work
Commitment
We will
of
so that
will demonstrate
as measured by
by
![Page 81: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
Sample SMART Reading Goal
We, the teaching staff at Johnson Middle School will improve students’ skills in vocabulary and comprehension in all content areas for all 6th, 7th and 8th grade students so that 85% show proficiency or above, while accelerating the performance of special education students so that 65% show proficient levels on the MCA II reading assessments given in May, 2013.
81
![Page 82: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
![Page 83: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
![Page 84: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
THE END
![Page 85: 2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110209/56649e225503460f94b0f6e3/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)