2010-2011 campus improvement plan - thompson

8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Thompson

1/16

Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Campus Plans

CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD

June R. Thompson

CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN2010-2011

Angie Doak, Principal

Vision Statement: Thompson Elementary, in partnership with our families and community, will developstudents who meet or exceed the local and state standards needed to successfully transition to middle

school and to take advantage of the highest educational opportunities available.

October 1, 2010


2/16

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

2

CIC MEMBERS

Name Position Years Served Signature

Angie Doak Principal 3Robyn Callahan Assistant Principal 1

Farah Rehman Kinder Teacher 2

Karen Geddie First Grade Teacher 2

Julie Ford Second Grade Teacher 2

Alejandro Torrealba Third Grade Teacher 1

Wanda Vollenweider Fourth Grade Teacher 1

Eric Herrington Fifth Grade Teacher 1Courtney Wilson Special Education Teacher 3

Minerva Gomez Parent Representative 2

Delores Stanley District Representative 7


3/16


3

PLANNING PROCESS

Needs Assessment

The Campus Improvement Council is composed of representative professional staff, parents of students enrolled at the campus,business representatives and community members. The Campus Improvement Council establishes and reviews campus educationalplans, goals, performance objectives, and major classroom instructional programs. An annual Campus Improvement Plan guides thiswork. The Campus Improvement Plan is based on a comprehensive needs assessment which includes student achievementindicators, disaggregated by all student groups served by the campus. Additional factors such as school processes (e.g., attendance,graduation, tardies, discipline referrals, teacher absences), perception (e.g., staff, parent and community surveys), and demographics

(e.g., enrollment trends, staff turnover) are to be considered.

The Campus Improvement Plan is to include (TEC Chapter 11, subchapter F, section 11.253):1. Assessment of academic achievement for each student using the student achievement indicator system.2. Set campus performance objectives based on the student achievement indicator system, including objectives for special needs

populations, including students in special education.3. Identification of how campus goals will be met for each student.4. Identification of resources needed to implement the plan.

5. Identification of staff needed to implement the plan.6. Timelines for reaching goals.7. Periodic, measureable progress toward the performance objectives.8. Goals and methods for violence prevention and intervention on campus.9. Program for encouraging parental involvement.10. Goals and objectives for a coordinated health program (elementary and middle schools) which is based on student fitness data,

student academic performance data, student attendance rates, percentage of students who are educationally disadvantaged thatensures that students participate in moderate to vigorous physical activity.

Annual analysis of the plan and review of various assessment data are used to determine objectives that address campusgoals. Specific strategies and action steps are developed to address these objectives. This process ensures a commitment toexcellence and a resolve to provide the best instructional plan for every student.


4/16


4

Campuses receiving Title 1 funds must address Title 1 targets in campus plans and indicate where Title 1funds will be spent.

Title I --Targeted Assisted ( TA )Must address the 8 components of a Targeted Assisted Program

TA 1. Resources used to help children meet state academic achievement standardsTA 2. Planning for identified students incorporated into existing school planningTA 3. Methods and strategies based on scientifically based researchTA 4. TA program is coordinated with and supports regular educational programsTA 5. Highly qualified teachersTA 6. Professional DevelopmentTA 7. Increase Parental InvolvementTA 8. Coordination of federal, state, and local services

Title I -- School-wide Components (TS)TS 1. Comprehensive needs assessmentTS 2. School-wide reform strategiesTS 3. Highly qualified teachersTS 4. Professional developmentTS 5. Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers to high need schools

TS 6. Parental involvementTS 7. Assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programsTS 8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding use of academic assessmentsTS 9. Students difficulties identified on a timely basisTS10.Coordination and integration between federal, state, and local services


5/16


5

The Goal of C-FB ISD is high achievement for all students.

Supporting Objective 1: Continuously increase student achievementA. TEA Recognized/Exemplary DistrictB. Recognized/Exemplary SchoolsC. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)D. Achievement GapE. Special PopulationsF. TAKS Commended Scores (all students)G. Higher Education Readiness Component (TSI) (EXIT Scores)

H. SATI. PSAT/NMSQTJ. Advanced PlacementK. Graduation Data

Supporting Objective 2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staffA. Out of School SuspensionsB. DAEP PlacementsC. Attendance Rate

Supporting Objective 3: Continuously increase operational effectivenessA. Financial Integrity Rating System in Texas (School FIRST)B. Increase percentage of operating expenditures expended for instructionC. Fund balance as a percentage of the total expenditure budget excluding TIF and Chapter 41 paymentsD. Kilowatt hour per sq. ft. usageE. Overtime hoursF. Highly Qualified Teachers

G. Teacher Classroom Attendance RateH. All Staff Attendance RateI. Teacher Turnover RateJ. Availability of Critical Technology Systems

Supporting Objective 4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school systemA. Parent Survey - Achieving Quality TogetherB. Stakeholder Survey (to be developed)

C. Staff Survey (to be developed)


6/16


6

Improve TAKS onWritingcompositions andsubtests by

recognizing andcorrectingeffectivesentenceconstruction inwritten texts.

By 201190% of allsub- groupswill meet orexceed theproficiencystandard on

the TAKSWriting andincreasecommendedscores by10%.

Objective : Writtencompositions

passing scores4th

Overall 85%

ED 81%AA 90%

H 80%W 92%SE *

LEP 42%

Objective 4:Recognize andcorrect effectivesentenceconstruction inwritten text.

4thOverall 83%

ED 82%AA 75%

H 77%

W 83%SE 53%LEP 73%

RESULTSGOAL

Should identifywhat is desired

in terms ofperformanceafter, or as a

result of, puttingnew processes

in place orimprovingexisting

processes.

SMARTGOAL

Goal should beStrategic and

specific,Measurable,Attainable,

Results-based,and Time-bound.

INDICATORStandards and objectives(weak areas for students)

MEASURESTools well use todetermine wherestudents are nowand whether they

are improving.

TARGETSThe attainable

performance level wewould like to see.

Remember . . . The one accomplishment that would foster longer-range actions would be a goal worthy of commitment.

-Peter Senge, The Fifth Discipline(1990)

Open-ended/commonassessments,informalobservations,

Released TAKS,Writing notebooks,

ortfolios

Open-ended/commonassessments,informal observations

Objective : Writtencomposition.

4th

Overall 90%ED 90%AA 90%

H 90%W 95%

SE 80%LEP 80%

Released TAKS,Writing notebooks,portfolios

Objective 4:Recognize and

correct effectivesentence constructionin written text.

4thOverall 90%

ED 90%AA 90%

H 90%W 92%

SE 80%LEP 80%


7/16


7

Improve TAKS onReadingunderstandingbasic writtentexts andapplying criticalthinking skills.texts.

By 2011

90% of allsub- groupswill meet orexceed theproficiencystandard onthe TAKSReadingand

increasecommendedscores by10%.

Objective 1: Thestudent willdemonstrate a basicunderstanding ofculturally diversewritten texts.

AllOverall 83%

ED 81%

AA 82%H 81%W 91%SE 80

LEP 73%

Objective 3: Thestudent will use avariety of strategies

to analyze culturallydiverse writtentexts.

AllOverall 85%

ED 79%

AA 75%H 81%

W 87%SE 77%LEP 73%

RESULTSGOAL

Should identifywhat is desired

in terms ofperformanceafter, or as a

result of, puttingnew processes

in place orimprovingexisting

processes.

SMARTGOAL

Goal should beStrategic and

specific,Measurable,Attainable,

Results-based,and Time-bound.

INDICATORStandards and objectives(weak areas for students)

MEASURESTools well use todetermine where

students are nowand whether they

are improving.

TARGETSThe attainable

performance level wewould like to see.

Remember . . . The one accomplishment that would foster longer-range actions would be a goal worthy of commitment.

-Peter Senge, The Fifth Discipline(1990)


Released TAKS,MAP Tests, portfolios


Objective : Writtencomposition.

4thOverall 90%

ED 90%AA 90%

H 90%

W 95%SE 80%

LEP 80%

Released TAKS,MAP Tests, portfolios

Objective 4:Recognize andcorrect effectivesentence constructionin written text.

4th

Overall 90%ED 90%AA 90%H 90%

W 92%

SE 80%LEP 80%


8/16


8

ThompsonCampus Goals & Objectives

2010 TAKS, PARTICIPATION, & ATTENDANCE DATA

2011 GOALS

All Students African American Hispanic White Special EdEconomically

DisadvantagedLEP

INDICATOR2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

Reading/English Language Arts 93 94 83 90 92 93 99 99 86 90 91 91 84 90

Mathematics 90 92 92 92 89 90 88 90 99 99 88 90 88 90

Writing 85 90 90 90 81 90 92 93 * 90 81 90 79 90

Science 8890

8090

8690

9999

5770

8590

5080

Social Studies

All Tests

Graduation 2009

Graduation 2010 Goal

Participation: Reading/Language Arts 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Participation: Math 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Attendance 97.4 98 97.2 98 97.6 98 96.8 97 96.6 97 97.6 98 97.7 98


9/16


9

Thompson

Campus Goals

2010 Percentage of Commended Students

2011 Goals

All Students African American Hispanic White

INDICATORCam-pus State

Diff.

fromstate

2011Goal

Cam-pus State

Diff.

fromstate

2011Goal

Cam-pus State

Diff.

fromstate

2011Goal

Cam-pus State

Diff.

fromstate

2011Goal

Reading/English

Language Arts30 35 -5 40 9 25 -16 19 29 28 +1 39 45 48 -3 55

Mathematics 40 37 +3 50 13 23 -10 23 40 31 +9 50 58 47 +11 68

Writing 7 30 -23 17


10/16


10

Thompson

2010-11 Campus Focus

District Supporting Objective #1: Continuously increase student achievement

Campus Focus # 1 Criteria for Success Performance Measure90% of all sub groups will pass TAKS Writing in 2011 D, E

10% commended increase in all sub groups on TAKS Writing F

Campus rating of Exemplary from TEA in 2011 B

10% increase in Writing objective 4 E

Improve student achievement

Using 08 09 as a baseline, increase overall number of fitness tests passed by

3% (09 10 third grade students will establish their baseline testing.)

D, E

Campus Focus #2 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureMinimum of 50% of students will meet target growth in reading as measured

by spring 2011 MAP

D, E

Students not meeting target growth in reading as measured by spring 2011MAP will miss their target by no more than 2 RITs

D, E

10% increase on passing rate of open-ended assessment D, E

Improve achievement in

Reading

50% of Tier III Reading students will show sufficient gains to move to Tier II

status.

D, E


11/16


11

Thompson2010-11 Campus Focus

District Supporting Objective #2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

Campus Focus #3 Criteria for Success Performance Measure10% reduction in office discipline referrals A, B

10% increase in student participation in extra-curricular activities C

Improve school climate forstudents

Campus Focus #4 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureIncrease teacher participation in PTA sponsored events CImprove school climate for

staff

Campus Focus #5 Criteria for Success Performance Measure50% of teachers will be GT certified by the end of 2010-2011 CImprove learning

environment for staff


12/16


12

Thompson


District Supporting Objective #3: Continuously increase operational effectiveness

Campus Focus #6 Criteria for Success Performance Measure3% reduction in electricity usage per month DDecrease energy consumption


13/16


13

Thompson


District Supporting Objective #4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school

system

Campus Focus #7 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureIncrease PTA membership by 10% from 2010-2011 A

Increase parent-community survey effectiveness rating by at least .5 A

PTA attendance at grade level performances will represent a minimum of50% of grade level parents

A

Inform our parents of parent education programs A

Improve parental involvement


14/16

CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN

2010-2011

Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Campus Plans

Campus FocusTitle

TargetArea

ACTIONSTRATEGY

FORMATIVEMEASURE

ASSESSMENTTIMELINE

RESPONSIBLEPERSON(S)

COST/RESOURCES

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

X XTS1, 2, 8

Include TAKSformatted

questions onclassroom

assignments andsummative

assessments

Teacher made testsBenchmark tests

August 2010-June 2011

Angie DoakCampus budget

X XTS1, 2,8,

9

Analyze 2010-2011data to determinelow student SEs

and planappropriate safety

nets

Grade level teammeetings

Team leader meetings


Angie DoakRobyn Callahan

Kathi GibsonNidia Cedillo

Campus budget

X XTS1, 2,

8, 9

Teachers will meetat least once a

week

Weekly meeting agendaAugust 2010-

June 2011Angie Doak Campus budget

X XTS 1,2,8, 9,

10

Provide flexiblegrouping and

extended learningopportunities to

meet the needs ofAt Risk and

Advancedstudents

Dist/campusassessments, At-riskstudent performancedata: ESL, Homeworkclub, after school and

Saturday schooltutorials, student

portfolios; Advanced

Student data: AREmeetings, participationin competitions,

extension projects,independent contracts


Angie Doak

Campus budget,Title 1 Stimulus

Funds- $21,000.00

X X TS 1, 2,4

New teachers willbe trained in

Content LiteracyStrategies

Attendance,participation

August 2010 Kathi Gibson Campus budget

X X X TS 1, 2,

6TA7

Provide Spanish

translations at allschool events for

parents

Attendance August 2010-

June 2011

Angie Doak Campus budget


15/16


15

X X X TS 1, 6,7

Grade levelperformances atPTA meetings

Attendance September2010-May 2011


X X X TS1, 2,

6,

Science Family

Night

Attendance,

participation, project

Spring 2011 Angie Doak Campus budget

Title 1-$200.00

X TS1, 2, 6 Implementcharacter program

Reduction in officereferrals

September2010-June 2011

Michelle Garcia Campus budget

X X TS1, 4 Provide safetytraining to staff in

the followingareas: crisis, fire,

safety, code

red/yellow drills

Signature forms ofcompletion


Robyn Callahan Campus budget

X X TS3, 5 Participate indistrict job fair to

recruit highlyqualified teachers

Interviewee list April 2011 Angie Doak Campus Budget

X TS 2, 6 Increase parentalinvolvement by

providingvolunteer

sessions, ParentConnect, weekly

newsletters

Sign-in sheetsConnect Ed data



X X TS 1, 2 Implement Sciencevocabulary/alignedscience questions

through schoolwide TV monitors

TV monitors workingeffectively

Science power point

September2010- June 2011

Carrie Jacobson Campus budget

X X X TS1, 2,6, 9

Focus sessionsfor parents

regarding TAKSobjectives

Attendance/participation Fall 2010 Kathi GibsonNidia Cedillo

Campus budget

X X X TS1, 2,8, 9

Improve MathTAKS performancethrough coaching,

planning,modeling by

district specialist

Professional LearningCommunities

Daily assignmentstests

September2010- June 2011

Craig Rich District Funds

X X TS1, 2,

4, 8, 9

Implement Writing

Camp

Writing

compositions/strategies

Spring 2011 Kathi Gibson/Becky

Hood

Title 1/Stimulus-

$200.00X TS2, 4,

5, 8, 9Teachers willparticipate in PLCs

Mtg notes/agenda September2010-May 2011

DistrictSpecialist/Campus

Campus Funds


16/16


16

to study and learnthe IIP.

IFS

X TS2, 5 Sciencenotebooks will be

utilized in everyclassroom

Science Notebook

reviews

September2010-May 2011

RobynCallahan/Angie

Doak

Campus Funds

X TS2, 9 R-Time (characterdevelopmentprogram) will beimplemented inevery classroomweekly

R-Timelessons/walkthroughs

September2010-May 2011

Michelle Garcia Campus Funds

X TS2

Elem School: All

Health Classeswill correlate theimportance of

fitness tostudents health,

nutrition, andimproved

standardized testscores.

Teacher Lesson Plans On-goingHealth/Homeroom

TeachersHealth Textbooks

X TS2

Elem chool:Implement Test

Protocols/Procedures as

per district/statemandate

Fitnessgram Test Fall 2009Physical

EducationTeachers

FitnessgramAssessement

2010-2011 campus improvement plan - thompson

Documents