2010-2011 campus improvement plan - long

8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Long

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-2011-campus-improvement-plan-long 1/20

Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Campus Plans

CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD

Dan F. Long Middle School

CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN2010-2011

JOE COPELANDPrincipal

Vision Statement: All Students at Dan F. Long Middle School will meet the state’sassessment Standards at the proficient or commended level and enter high school ready

without remediation.

October 8, 2010



Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

2

CIC MEMBERS

Name Position Years Served Signature

Black, John Fine Arts/Band Director 12 YearsTaylor, Bobbie Teacher/ Math New Member

Johnson, Stephanie Teacher/Science 5 Years

Karigan, Chris Parent 3 Years

Kolkhorst, Meason Teacher/Tech Ed 6 Years

Little, Chris Teacher/Language Arts 10 Years

Pechacek, Susan Teacher/Skills for Living 2 Years

Powell, Stephanie Teacher/Science 6 YearsArmstrong, Debra CM/ Math New Member

Babick, Mrs. Parent New Member

Turner, Orville Teacher/Science 2 Years

Macedo, Dana Teacher/Math New Member

Copeland, Joe Principal New Member

Graham, Lynette Assistant Principal New Member

Seefeldt, Stephen Assistant Principal 2 Years




3

PLANNING PROCESS

Needs Assessment

The Campus Improvement Council is composed of representative professional staff, parents of students enrolled at the campus,business representatives and community members. The Campus Improvement Council establishes and reviews campus educationalplans, goals, performance objectives, and major classroom instructional programs. An annual Campus Improvement Plan guides thiswork. The Campus Improvement Plan is based on a comprehensive needs assessment which includes student achievementindicators, disaggregated by all student groups served by the campus. Additional factors such as school processes (e.g., attendance,graduation, tardies, discipline referrals, teacher absences), perception (e.g., staff, parent and community surveys), and demographics

(e.g., enrollment trends, staff turnover) are to be considered.

The Campus Improvement Plan is to include (TEC Chapter 11, subchapter F, section 11.253):1. Assessment of academic achievement for each student using the student achievement indicator system.2. Set campus performance objectives based on the student achievement indicator system, including objectives for special needs

populations, including students in special education.3. Identification of how campus goals will be met for each student.4. Identification of resources needed to implement the plan.

5. Identification of staff needed to implement the plan.6. Timelines for reaching goals.7. Periodic, measureable progress toward the performance objectives.8. Goals and methods for violence prevention and intervention on campus.9. Program for encouraging parental involvement.10. Goals and objectives for a coordinated health program (elementary and middle schools) which is based on student fitness data,

student academic performance data, student attendance rates, percentage of students who are educationally disadvantaged thatensures that students participate in moderate to vigorous physical activity.

Annual analysis of the plan and review of various assessment data are used to determine objectives that address campusgoals. Specific strategies and action steps are developed to address these objectives. This process ensures a commitment toexcellence and a resolve to provide the best instructional plan for every student.




4

Campuses receiving Title 1 funds must address Title 1 targets in campus plans and indicate where Title 1funds will be spent.

Title I --Targeted Assisted ( TA )Must address the 8 components of a Targeted Assisted Program

TA 1. Resources used to help children meet state academic achievement standardsTA 2. Planning for identified students incorporated into existing school planningTA 3. Methods and strategies based on scientifically based researchTA 4. TA program is coordinated with and supports regular educational programsTA 5. Highly qualified teachersTA 6. Professional DevelopmentTA 7. Increase Parental InvolvementTA 8. Coordination of federal, state, and local services

Title I -- School-wide Components (TS)TS 1. Comprehensive needs assessmentTS 2. School-wide reform strategiesTS 3. Highly qualified teachersTS 4. Professional developmentTS 5. Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers to high need schools

TS 6. Parental involvementTS 7. Assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programsTS 8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding use of academic assessmentsTS 9. Students’ difficulties identified on a timely basisTS10.Coordination and integration between federal, state, and local services




5

The Goal of C-FB ISD is high achievement for all students.

Supporting Objective 1: Continuously increase student achievementA. TEA Recognized/Exemplary DistrictB. Recognized/Exemplary SchoolsC. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)D. Achievement GapE. Special PopulationsF. TAKS Commended Scores (all students)G. Higher Education Readiness Component (TSI) (EXIT Scores)

H. SATI. PSAT/NMSQTJ. Advanced PlacementK. Graduation Data

Supporting Objective 2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staffA. Out of School SuspensionsB. DAEP PlacementsC. Attendance Rate

Supporting Objective 3: Continuously increase operational effectivenessA. Financial Integrity Rating System in Texas (School FIRST)B. Increase percentage of operating expenditures expended for instructionC. Fund balance as a percentage of the total expenditure budget excluding TIF and Chapter 41 paymentsD. Kilowatt hour per sq. ft. usageE. Overtime hoursF. Highly Qualified Teachers

G. Teacher Classroom Attendance RateH. All Staff Attendance RateI. Teacher Turnover RateJ. Availability of Critical Technology Systems

Supporting Objective 4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school systemA. Parent Survey - Achieving Quality TogetherB. Stakeholder Survey (to be developed)

C. Staff Survey (to be developed)




6




7




8




9




10




11




12

Dan F. Long Middle SchoolCampus Goals & Objectives

2010 TAKS, PARTICIPATION, & ATTENDANCE DATA

2011 GOALS

All Students African American Hispanic White Special EdEconomically

DisadvantagedLEP

INDICATOR2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

Reading/English Language Arts 90 96 87 97 88 98 97 100 66 76 86 96 73 83

Mathematics 82 92 76 86 79 89 93 100 70 80 79 89 62 72

Writing 95 99 95 100 95 100 98 100 74 84 95 100 84 94

Science 81 91 77 87 72 82 97 100 28 68 77 87 23 63Social Studies 97 100 100 100 94 100 100 100 77 87 95 100 84 94

All Tests

Graduation 2009

Graduation 2010 Goal

Participation: Reading/Language Arts 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 100 100 100 100 100 99 100

Participation: Math 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Attendance 96 98 95 98 96 99 96 98 95 98 96 98 96 97




13

Dan F. Long Middle SchoolCampus Goals

2010 Percentage of Commended Students

2011 Goals

All Students African American Hispanic White

INDICATORCam-

pusState

Diff.from

state

2011

Goal

Cam-

pusState

Diff.from

state

2011

Goal

Cam-

pusState

Diff.from

state

2011

Goal

Cam-

pusState

Diff.from

state

2011

Goal

Reading/English

Language Arts35 36 - 45 23 27 - 33 27 26 + 37 51 49 + 61

Mathematics 22 18 + 32 8 10 - 18 19 14 + 29 32 24 + 42

Writing 39 36 + 49 25 27 - 35 36 28 + 46 45 47 - 55

Science 33 30 + 43 15 16 - 25 24 21 + 34 51 44 + 61

Social Studies 41 42 - 60 26 31 - 36 30 33 - 40 66 56 + 76

Special Ed. Economically Disadvantaged LEP

INDICATORCam-

pusState

Diff.

from

state

2011

Goal

Cam-

pusState

Diff.

from

state

2011

Goal

Cam-

pusState

Diff.

from

state

2011

Goal

Reading/English

Language Arts 2 10 - 12 31 25 + 41 0 6 - 10

Mathematics 0 4 - 10 18 12 + 28 7 7 17

Writing 0 7 - 10 35 25 + 45 0 6 - 10

Science 0 9 - 10 27 19 - 27 0 5 - 10

Social Studies 6 14 - 16 34 30 + 44 0 11 - 10




14


2010-11 Campus Focus

District Supporting Objective #1: Continuously increase student achievement

Campus Focus # 1 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureCampus rating of “Exemplary” from TEA in 2012 TAKS

10% increase in AA Commended scores on TAKS Math TAKS

80% or higher of AA 7th graders will pass TAKS Math in 2011 TAKS80% or higher of AA 8th graders will pass TAKS Math in 2011 TAKS

INCREASE STUDENT

ACHIEVEMENT

At least 10% increase in H students who pass TAKS Math in 2011 TAKS

89% of Eco Disadvantaged students will pass TAKS Math in 2011 TAKS

68% or higher of all sub pops will pass TAKS Science in 2011 TAKS

Implement a consistent SSR program a minimum of 3 days per week MAP/TAKS

CAMPUS FOCUS #2 CRITERIA FOR SUCCESS Performance MeasureUsing ’09 – ‘10 as a baseline, increase overall number of fitness testspassed by 3% (‘09 – ’10 third grade students will establish theirbaseline testing.)

FITNESS GRAMINCREASE STUDENT

PHYSICAL FITNESS




15



District Supporting Objective #2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

Campus Focus # 3 Criteria for Success Performance Measure10% reduction in student discipline referrals from 2009-10 TEAMS

10% increase in student participation with academic decathlons and electives Total student

participation incompetitions

Improve school

Climate/Culture

Campus Focus #? Criteria for Success Performance Measure





16



District Supporting Objective #3: Continuously increase operational effectiveness

Campus Focus #4 Criteria for Success Performance Measure3-5% reduction in electricity usage per month 2009-2010 usage

comparisonContinue reductions in energyconsumption

Campus Focus # Criteria for Success Performance Measure





17



District Supporting Objective #4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school

system

Campus Focus #5 Criteria for Success Performance Measure10% increase in PTA membership in 201020% increase in Report Card Pick-up Parent participation

50% of DFL parents will attend one or both Parent Conference nights(# of Students=764)

Improve Parental

Involvement

Campus Focus #6 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureAt least 5 articles about positive happenings at Dan F. Long submittedto the Dallas Morning News and CFBISD Community Report.Increase positivecommunication about

Long Middle School tothe Community and theDistrict





20

xTS.1.10

Middle School: Implement TestProtocols/ Procedures as perdistrict/state mandate

Fitness gram Test Fall 2010Physical EducationTeachers

Fitness gram Assessment

2010-2011 campus improvement plan - long

Documents