2010-2011 campus improvement plan - kent

Upload: cfbisd

Post on 07-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Kent

    1/14

    Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    Campus Plans

    CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD

    Kent Elementary

    CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN2010-2011

    Debbie Williams, Principal

    Vision Statement: Kent Elementary, in partnership with our families and community, will develop studentswho meet or exceed the local and state standards needed to successfully transition to middle school and to

    take advantage the highest educational opportunities available.

    October 1, 2010

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Kent

    2/14

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    2

    CIC MEMBERS

    Name Position Years Served Signature

    Donna Cotter Support Staff 1

    Susan Ellis Classroom Teacher 2

    Yvonne Falcon Special Education 1

    Staci McAllister Classroom Teacher 1

    Susan Romaine Classroom Teacher 1

    Christie Self Support Staff 2Julie Nors Parent 1

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Kent

    3/14

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    3

    PLANNING PROCESS

    Needs Assessment

    The Campus Improvement Council is composed of representative professional staff, parents of students enrolled at the campus,business representatives and community members. The Campus Improvement Council establishes and reviews campus educationalplans, goals, performance objectives, and major classroom instructional programs. An annual Campus Improvement Plan guides thiswork. The Campus Improvement Plan is based on a comprehensive needs assessment which includes student achievementindicators, disaggregated by all student groups served by the campus. Additional factors such as school processes (e.g., attendance,graduation, tardies, discipline referrals, teacher absences), perception (e.g., staff, parent and community surveys), and demographics

    (e.g., enrollment trends, staff turnover) are to be considered.

    The Campus Improvement Plan is to include (TEC Chapter 11, subchapter F, section 11.253):1. Assessment of academic achievement for each student using the student achievement indicator system.2. Set campus performance objectives based on the student achievement indicator system, including objectives for special needs

    populations, including students in special education.3. Identification of how campus goals will be met for each student.4. Identification of resources needed to implement the plan.

    5. Identification of staff needed to implement the plan.6. Timelines for reaching goals.7. Periodic, measureable progress toward the performance objectives.8. Goals and methods for violence prevention and intervention on campus.9. Program for encouraging parental involvement.10. Goals and objectives for a coordinated health program (elementary and middle schools) which is based on student fitness data,

    student academic performance data, student attendance rates, percentage of students who are educationally disadvantaged thatensures that students participate in moderate to vigorous physical activity.

    Annual analysis of the plan and review of various assessment data are used to determine objectives that address campusgoals. Specific strategies and action steps are developed to address these objectives. This process ensures a commitment toexcellence and a resolve to provide the best instructional plan for every student.

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Kent

    4/14

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    4

    Campuses receiving Title 1 funds must address Title 1 targets in campus plans and indicate where Title 1funds will be spent.

    Title I --Targeted Assisted ( TA )Must address the 8 components of a Targeted Assisted Program

    TA 1. Resources used to help children meet state academic achievement standardsTA 2. Planning for identified students incorporated into existing school planningTA 3. Methods and strategies based on scientifically based researchTA 4. TA program is coordinated with and supports regular educational programsTA 5. Highly qualified teachersTA 6. Professional DevelopmentTA 7. Increase Parental InvolvementTA 8. Coordination of federal, state, and local services

    Title I -- School-wide Components (TS)TS 1. Comprehensive needs assessmentTS 2. School-wide reform strategiesTS 3. Highly qualified teachersTS 4. Professional developmentTS 5. Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers to high need schools

    TS 6. Parental involvementTS 7. Assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programsTS 8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding use of academic assessmentsTS 9. Students difficulties identified on a timely basisTS10.Coordination and integration between federal, state, and local services

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Kent

    5/14

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    5

    The Goal of C-FB ISD is high achievement for all students.

    Supporting Objective 1: Continuously increase student achievementA. TEA Recognized/Exemplary DistrictB. Recognized/Exemplary SchoolsC. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)D. Achievement GapE. Special PopulationsF. TAKS Commended Scores (all students)G. Higher Education Readiness Component (TSI) (EXIT Scores)

    H. SATI. PSAT/NMSQTJ. Advanced PlacementK. Graduation Data

    Supporting Objective 2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staffA. Out of School SuspensionsB. DAEP PlacementsC. Attendance Rate

    Supporting Objective 3: Continuously increase operational effectivenessA. Financial Integrity Rating System in Texas (School FIRST)B. Increase percentage of operating expenditures expended for instructionC. Fund balance as a percentage of the total expenditure budget excluding TIF and Chapter 41 paymentsD. Kilowatt hour per sq. ft. usageE. Overtime hoursF. Highly Qualified Teachers

    G. Teacher Classroom Attendance RateH. All Staff Attendance RateI. Teacher Turnover RateJ. Availability of Critical Technology Systems

    Supporting Objective 4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school systemA. Parent Survey - Achieving Quality TogetherB. Stakeholder Survey (to be developed)

    C. Staff Survey (to be developed)

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Kent

    6/14

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    6

    Improvestudentcommendedperformanceon 2011

    TAKS writtencomposition.

    50% of allsub-populationswill becommendedon TAKS

    writing

    Development ofideas

    Conventions

    RESULTS

    GOALShould identifywhat is desired

    in terms ofperformanceafter, or as a

    result of, puttingnew processes

    in place orimproving

    existingprocesses.

    SMARTGOAL

    Goal shouldbe Strategicand specific,Measurable,Attainable,Results-

    based, andTime-bound.

    INDICATORStandards and

    objectives (weak areasfor students)

    MEASURESTools well use todetermine wherestudents are nowand whether they

    are improving.

    TARGETSThe attainable

    performance level wewould like to see.

    Remember . . . The one accomplishment that would foster longer-range actions would be agoal worthy of

    commitment.

    -Peter Senge, The Fifth Discipline(1990)

    F&P Open Ended

    Response

    Student writingrubric analysis

    Commended TAKS Writing

    2009 2010GOAL2011

    All Students 79 56 60

    AfricanAmer. 50 40 50

    Hispanic 91 63 65

    White 88 57 60

    Spec. Ed. 55 57

    Eco. Disadv. 56 47 50LEP 13 50

    Student writing

    portfolio

    SMART GOALS (Example)90% of all subgroups will meet or exceed the standard for passing TAKS Reading

    Obj. 1 Basic Understanding85% of all subgroups will meet or exceed the standard for passing TAKS MathObj. 1 Numbers, Operations, and Quantitative ReasoningObj. 6 Mathematical Processes and Tools

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Kent

    7/14

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    7

    Kent ElementaryCampus Goals & Objectives

    2010 TAKS, PARTICIPATION, & ATTENDANCE DATA

    2011 GOALS

    All Students African American Hispanic White Special Ed

    Economically

    Disadvantaged LEPINDICATOR

    2010Data

    2011Goal

    2010Data

    2011Goal

    2010Data

    2011Goal

    2010Data

    2011Goal

    2010Data

    2011Goal

    2010Data

    2011Goal

    2010Data

    2011Goal

    Reading/English Language Arts 99 100 90 100 100 100 100 100 95 100 97 100 96 100

    Mathematics 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

    Writing 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

    Science 98100

    100100

    100100

    100100

    *100

    93100

    *100

    Social Studies - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    All Tests 99 100 98 100 100 100 100 100 98 100 98 100 98 100

    Graduation 2009

    Graduation 2010 Goal

    Participation: Reading/Language Arts 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

    Participation: Math 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

    Attendance 97.4 98

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Kent

    8/14

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    8

    Kent Elementary

    Campus Goals

    2010 Percentage of Commended Students

    2011 Goals

    All Students African American Hispanic White

    INDICATORCam-pus State

    Diff.

    fromstate

    2011Goal

    Cam-pus State

    Diff.

    fromstate

    2011Goal

    Cam-pus State

    Diff.

    fromstate

    2011Goal

    Cam-pus State

    Diff.

    fromstate

    2011Goal

    Reading/English

    Language Arts68 35 +33 70 53 25 +28 55 55 28 +27 57 77 48 +29 80

    Mathematics 68 37 +31 70 42 23 +19 45 56 31 +25 60 77 47 +30 80

    Writing 56 30 +26 60 40 21 +19 50 64 25 +39 65 57 38 +19 60

    Science 79 44 +35 80 63 28 +35 65 70 36 +34 72 85 59 +26 87

    Social Studies

    Special Ed. Economically Disadvantaged LEP

    INDICATORCam-pus

    StateDiff.

    from

    state

    2011Goal

    Cam-pus

    StateDiff.

    from

    state

    2011Goal

    Cam-pus

    StateDiff.

    from

    state

    2011Goal

    Reading/EnglishLanguage Arts

    45 17 +28 47 53 26 +27 55 46 23 +23 48

    Mathematics 43 17 +26 45 53 28 +25 55 46 25 +21 48

    Writing 55 11 +44 57 47 22 +25 50 13 20 -7 50

    Science * 24 * 64 33 +31 66 * 20 * 25

    Social Studies

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Kent

    9/14

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    9

    Kent Elementary

    2010-11 Campus Focus

    District Supporting Objective #1: Continuously increase student achievement

    Campus Focus # 1 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureThe percentage of students passing unit test will increase 10%. B,D

    The percentage of students passing MOY and EOY tests will increase 10%. B,D

    The percentage of students reading on grade level (F&P, MAP) will increase

    10%.

    B,D

    Use the IIP process tostrengthen instruction

    Campus Focus #2 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureAWARE data for objective 6 will increase 10%. B,D,FIncrease Objective 6

    (mathematical process and

    tools) in Math

    Campus Focus #3 Criteria for Success Performance Measure

    LEP scores for TAKS commended in writing will increase to 50%. B,D,E,FAfrican American scores for TAKS commended writing will increase to 50%. B,D,E,F

    Increase the number ofstudents commended on

    TAKS writing.

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Kent

    10/14

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    10

    Kent Elementary

    2010-11 Campus Focus

    District Supporting Objective #2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

    Campus Focus #4 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureReduce tardies by 10%. CReduce the number of

    students who are tardy each

    day.

    Campus Focus Criteria for Success Performance Measure

    Campus Focus Criteria for Success Performance Measure

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Kent

    11/14

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    11

    Kent Elementary

    2010-11 Campus Focus

    District Supporting Objective #3: Continuously increase operational effectiveness

    Campus Focus #5 Criteria for Success Performance Measure2 point increase in energy usage score DDecrease kilowatt usage at

    Kent.

    Campus Focus Criteria for Success Performance Measure

    Campus Focus Criteria for Success Performance Measure

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Kent

    12/14

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    12

    Kent Elementary

    2010-11 Campus Focus

    District Supporting Objective #4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school

    system

    Campus Focus #6 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureUpdate website to include information per parent survey by 15% BIncrease the efficiency of

    providing information to

    parents.

    Campus Focus #7 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureIncrease submissions to C-FB news by 10% AIncrease community

    awareness of campus activities

    Campus Focus Criteria for Success Performance Measure

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Kent

    13/14

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Kent

    14/14

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    14

    X procedures per state mandate Marsh