2-thome [compatibility mode](1)

Upload: chakfarmer

Post on 03-Jun-2018

227 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 2-Thome [Compatibility Mode](1)

    1/19

    Tom Richards

    BATTERED PILE MISCONCEPTIONS

    INTRODUCTION

    Problem s tatement Which batter is better? How to determine batter angles?

    Simple Refined

    Do batter piles have bending moments? NOT covering seismic stiffness / load attraction in detail

  • 8/12/2019 2-Thome [Compatibility Mode](1)

    2/19

  • 8/12/2019 2-Thome [Compatibility Mode](1)

    3/19

    AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specificat ions (2010)

    C10.7.1.4In some cases , i t may be desirable to use bat ter

    piles. From a general viewpoint, batter piles provide a

    much sti ffer resis tance to horizontal loads than would be

    possible with vertical piles. They can be very effective

    in resisting static horizontal loads.

    Due to increased foundation stiffness, batter piles

    may not be desirable in resisting horizontal dynamic

    loads if the structure is located in an area where seismic

    loads are potentially high.

    PennDOT Design Manual Part 4 June 2009

    6.15 PILES 6.15.1 General ..

    Based on the parametric study conduc ted by the

    Department, .a pile gro up com posed of

    both vertical and battered piles which is subj ected to

    lateral load shall be designed assuming th at all lateral load

    is resisted by the horizontal component of th e axial

    capacity of the battered piles. .

    The use of the above design procedur e with

    any of the following conditions requires the approval of

    the Chief Bridge Engineer:

    Piles with a specified steel yield strength other than 250 MPa {36 ksi} Piles with bending stiffness properties less than HP250X62 {HP10X42}

    Very soft clays or very loose sands .

    Unfactored vertical load to horizontal load ratio less

    than 3.5 (excluding seismic forces)

  • 8/12/2019 2-Thome [Compatibility Mode](1)

    4/19

    PennDOT Design Manual Part 4

    5.13.4 Concrete Piles5.13.4.1 GENERAL C5.13.4.1

    The following shall supplement A5.13.4.1.

    Piles shall b e designed as struc tural members capable

    of safely supporting all impos ed loads. A pile group

    compos ed of both vertical and battered piles which is

    subjected to l ateral load sh all be designed assuming that all

    lateral load is resisted by the horizontal compo nent of the

    axial capacity o f the battered piles.

    HMMMM?

    6.15 PILES

    6.15.1 General

    The following shall r eplace A 6.15.1.

    Piles shall be designed as structural members capable

    of safely supporting all imposed loads.

    For a pile group composed of only vertical piles

    which is subjected to lateral load, the pile structural

    analysis shall include explicit consideration of soilstructure

    interaction effects using a COM624P analysis

    (Wang and Reese, 1993) or LPILE 5.0 analysis.

    Based on the parametric study co nducted by the

    Department, which is described in the commentary, an

    abutment or retaining wall with a pile group composed of

    both vertical and battered piles which is subjected to

    lateral load shall be designed assuming that all lateral load

    is resisted by t he horizontal component of the axial

    capacity of the battered piles. The vertical load shall be

    distributed among piles in the group using a simple elastic

    procedure. The use of the above design procedure with

    any of the following conditions requires the approval of

    the Chief Bridge Engineer:

    Piles with a specified steel yield strength other than250 MPa {36 ksi}

    Piles with bending stiffness properties less than

    HP250X62 {HP10X42}

    Very soft clays or very loose sands as defined in

    Standard Drawing BC-795M

    Piles with bending stiffness properties less than

    HP310X79 {HP12X53} in soft clays or loose sands

    as defined in Standard Drawing BC-795M

    Unfactored vertical load to horizontal load ratio less

    than 3.5 (excluding seismic forces)

  • 8/12/2019 2-Thome [Compatibility Mode](1)

    5/19

    10.7.3.12 NOMINAL HORIZONTAL RESISTANCE OFPILE FOUNDATIONS

    10.7.3.12.1 Batter Piles

    The batter piles in a pile group shall resist the entire

    horizontal load through th e horizontal component of their

    axial capacity, unless an alternate method is appro ved by

    the Chief Bridg e Engineer.

    Refer to D6.15.1 for d esign pr ocedures for pile gro ups

    containing b attered piles.

    Cant I just take axial capacity times batter?

    Resolution of Forces at Top of Pile Pile and Ground

    1

    xBatter 1:x

    Batter angle=atan(1/x)

    Ph = P*sin(batter angle)

    ?

    P

    Ph

  • 8/12/2019 2-Thome [Compatibility Mode](1)

    6/19

    PennDOT Design Manual Part 4 June 2009

    6.15 PILES 6.15.1 General ..Based on the parametric study conduct ed by the

    Department, .a pile group co mposed of

    both vertical and battered piles which is subj ected to

    lateral load shall be designed assuming th at all lateral load

    is resisted by the horizontal component of th e axial

    capacity of the battered piles. .

    The use of the above design proc edure with

    any of the following conditions requires the approval of

    the Chief Bridge Engin eer:

    Piles with a specified steel yield strength other than 250 MPa {36 ksi}

    Piles with bending stiffness properties less than HP250X62 {HP10X42}

    Very soft clays or very loose sands . Unfactored vertical load to horizontal load ratio less

    than 3.5 (excluding seismic forces)

    Which batter is better?

  • 8/12/2019 2-Thome [Compatibility Mode](1)

    7/19

  • 8/12/2019 2-Thome [Compatibility Mode](1)

    8/19

    Which batter is better? What do actual tests say?Reese & VanImpe (2001)

    1.0

    2.0

    1.5

    0.5

    3.13 EFFECT OF BATTER. The lateral soil-resistance curvesfor a vertical pile in a horizontal groundsurface were modified by a constant toaccount for the effect of the inclinationof the pile. The values of themodifying co nstant as a function ofthe batter angle were deduced fromthe results in the test tank(Awosh ika & Reese 1971) and alsofrom the results from full-scale tests(Kubo 1964). .

    As shown in Figure 3.34, theagreement between the empirical curveand the experiments for the out-batterpiles (q is positive) agrees somewhatbetter than for the in-batter piles. Thedata indicate that the use of themodifier will yield results that aresomewhat questionable ; .( OPTOMISTIC )

    Which batter is better? Consider failure wedges

    What does LPILE say? Cohesive

  • 8/12/2019 2-Thome [Compatibility Mode](1)

    9/19

    Which batter is better? Consider failure wedges

    What does LPILE say? Granular

    Which batter is better? Consider failure wedges and

    vertical load

  • 8/12/2019 2-Thome [Compatibility Mode](1)

    10/19

    Cant I just take axial capacity times batter? MAYBE

    Resolution of Forces at Top of Pile Pile and Ground

    1

    xBatter 1:x

    Batter angle=atan(1/x)

    Ph = P*sin(batter angle)

    Pv Can we just wish this load here?

    PhP

    PennDOT Design Manual Part 4 June 2009

    6.15 PILES 6.15.1 General ..

    Based on the parametric study conduct ed by the

    Department, .a pile group co mposed of

    both vertical and battered piles which is subj ected to

    lateral load shall be designed assuming th at all lateral load

    is resisted by the horizontal component of th e axial

    capacity of the battered piles. .

    The use of the above design proc edure with

    any of the following conditions requires the approval of

    the Chief Bridge Engin eer:

    Piles with a specified steel yield strength other than 250 MPa {36 ksi} Piles with bending stiffness properties less than HP250X62 {HP10X42}

    Very soft clays or very loose sands .

    Unfactored vertical load to horizontal load ratio less

    than 3.5 (excluding seismic forces)

  • 8/12/2019 2-Thome [Compatibility Mode](1)

    11/19

    Which batter is better? Consider failure wedges andvertical load

    What does LPILE say? Granular

    Note 70 kips * tan(20 deg) = 25.5 kips

    How to determine batter angles

    A s imple graph ical procedure for es timat ing th e compressive andtensile forces in micropile groups c ontaining not mo re than threerows of micropil es is described in Tomlinson (1987) and Teng (1962).

    For analysis of t hree-dimensional pile groups that considersnonlin ear soil response and pile-soil-pile interaction, the GROUP 7program can be used.

  • 8/12/2019 2-Thome [Compatibility Mode](1)

    12/19

    How to determine batter angles SIMPLE STATICS

    How to determine batter angles - TENG

  • 8/12/2019 2-Thome [Compatibility Mode](1)

    13/19

    How to determine batter angles - TENG

    How to determine batter

    angles - TENGCenter of Gravity of Group

    Pile Group Moment of Inertia

    Transformed Moment to CG

    Vertical Force/pile = P/A+M/S

  • 8/12/2019 2-Thome [Compatibility Mode](1)

    14/19

  • 8/12/2019 2-Thome [Compatibility Mode](1)

    15/19

    How to determine batter angles GROUP modeling

    Do batter piles have bending moments?

  • 8/12/2019 2-Thome [Compatibility Mode](1)

    16/19

    An interest ing outcomefrom working with theGROUP program is therealization that evenbattered pile gro ups havebending moments in thepiles.

    Battered p iles cansubstantially reduce andbalance, but not eliminate,the bending moments inthe piles.

    Piles shou ld have pipe orcages at the top200 kip vertical load per pile 7x0.5 casing14 deg batter

    Do batter piles have bending moments?

    Do batter piles have bending moments?

    200 kip vertical load per pile 7x0.5 casingMoment = 5% of allowable stress

  • 8/12/2019 2-Thome [Compatibility Mode](1)

    17/19

    Pinned Fixed

    Do batter piles have bending moments?

    Do batter piles have bending moments?

  • 8/12/2019 2-Thome [Compatibility Mode](1)

    18/19

    Problem Statement - Revisi ted

    To deal with lateral load just batter the piles ???Maybe depends on vertical loads and hitting the sweet spot in ratio

    between lateral and vertical load Example questions from Engineers

    Is 60 ton allowable lateral capacity reasonably achievable for 12 inpressure grouted micropiles up to a 20 (1 : 2.75) batter?

    depends on vertical loads What lateral capacities are reasonable and at what batter angles, for

    post grout installation methods at this site?

    depends on vertical loads Cant I just take axial capacity times batter?

    NOT and satisfy basic equilibrium = NO

    CONCLUSIONS

    Battered piles are only efficient wi th vertical load Batter angles can be determined by

    Determinant statics Graphic Numerical modeling - GROUP

    Battered piles have bending moment even

    without horizontal load and need bendingductility and strength

  • 8/12/2019 2-Thome [Compatibility Mode](1)

    19/19