1985 annual radiological environ operating rept.' · sanqles not meeting the specified "a...

24
1985 ANNUAL RADIOLCXlICALENVIEMIEFFAL OPERATING REPOIG'T. LUCIE PLAÃF 'iifIT NOS 1 AND 2 License Nos. DPR-67, NPF-16 Docket Nos. 50-335, 50-389 Data Submitted By: Florida DHHS Report Prepared: ~ ,. Report Reviewed: -) 'i 8 y/iy/.z //c HP3: 1 8612020130 860423 PDR ADOCK 05000335 R PDR

Upload: others

Post on 28-Jun-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1985 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept.' · sanqles not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted andall explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively. Analysis

1985

ANNUAL

RADIOLCXlICALENVIEMIEFFAL

OPERATINGREPOIG'T.

LUCIE PLAÃF

'iifIT

NOS 1 AND 2

License Nos. DPR-67, NPF-16

Docket Nos. 50-335, 50-389

Data Submitted By: Florida DHHS

Report Prepared: ~ ,.Report Reviewed: -) 'i 8 y/iy/.z

//c

HP3: 1

8612020130 860423PDR ADOCK 05000335R PDR

Page 2: 1985 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept.' · sanqles not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted andall explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively. Analysis

1985. P&NLPL RPQICLCGICAL ENVIRCNRMAL CPBKTIlC REKRT

ST. Lu:IE PLPÃI' UNITS K5. 1 PbO 2

TABLE OF CCNT1M'S

IXSCRIPTICN

INIBXU"TICN

RPQIQXGICAL ENVIRQ41ENTAL NCNIXRIN BKG%%4

DISCDSS ICN AND INTEI69ETATICN CF RESULTS

ENVIHQ4KNI'ALRPQIOKGICAL KNIKMbG RKGMVlWNNL SlMPRY

DEVIATICNS/MISSING INTA

PbK.YSES WI1H LEDs ABOVE TABLE 0.12-1IXTECTICN CAI'ABILITIES

LAND USE CENSUS

KEY 10 SAr~ LCXATICNS

RPQIOLCGICAL RRVEILLNCE CF FLCRIM KÃKRAM) LICHT CCtvPPbh" S ST. LLCIE

SITE'IRST

QHRTER, 1985SEXT QHRTER, 1985THIRD CARTER, 1985KLBTHCP4RTER, 1985

RESULTS FKM THE INKRLAKBAKRYCChPMISCNRKKXKVI, 1985

TABLE 1

TABLE 1A

TABLE 1B.

TABLE 2

ATTPCHMENI'

ATTR34iENI'

HP3: 1

Page 3: 1985 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept.' · sanqles not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted andall explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively. Analysis

1985At+LHL RPQICLCGICAL ENNIKNMENIALOPERATING REKRT

ST. LU:IE PLANI - LNITS K5. I'M3 2,

Irma~iCNThis report is subnitted pursuant to Specification 6.9 of St. LucieUnit No. 1 and St. Lucie Unit No. 2 Technical Specifications. TheAnnual Radiological Enviromental Operating Report providesinforrretion, sumaries and analytical results pertaining to theRadiological Enviroraental Monitoring Progran for the calendar yearindicated. This report covers surveillance activities riveting therequirerrents of Unit No. 1 and Unit No. 2. Technical Specifications.

RADICUX;ICALE mea~AL ~leal¹ mXXVu

A. P~ur ose: The ouroose of the radiological enviromentaf nunitoringprogran is to provide representative rm.asuramnts of radiation andof radioactive rraterials in those exposure pathways and for thoseradionuclides which lead to the highest potential radiationexposures of members of the public resulting frcm stationoperation. The radiological envirorrrental monitoring progran alsosupplerrents the radiological effluent monitoring progran byverifying that the neasureable concentrations of radioactiverraterials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected onthe basis of the effluent measurements and the nadeling of theenvirormental exposure pathways.

B. Pro ran Descri tion: The Radiological Envirormental hhnitoringProgran for the St. Lucie Plant is conducted pursuant to TechnicalSpecifications 3/0.12 of St. Lucie Unit No. 1 and St. Lucie UnitNo. 2 Technical Specifications.

1. S le Locations T es and Fre uencies:

a. Direct radiation game exposure rate is rrunitoredcontinuously at 27 locations by themaluninescentdosirreters (TLD's)se 1ID's are collected and analyzedquarterly.

b. Airborne radioiodine and particulate sarplers are operatedcontinuously at five locations. Sarrples are collected andanalyzed weekly. Analyses include Iodine-131, gross beta,and gama isotopic nmasurern:nts.

c. Surface water samples are collected fran two locations.Samples are collected and analyzed weekly and rranthlyrespectively. Analyses 'include game isotopic and tritiunrraasurerants.

d. Bottcm sediment sarples are collected fran two locationscoinciding with the locations for surface water samples.Sanples are collected and analyzed semi-annually. Sedimentsarples are analyzed by gama isotopic rraasurenants.

Page 4: 1985 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept.' · sanqles not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted andall explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively. Analysis

1985ANNUAL RADIOUXSICAL ENVIKMMENI'ALOPERATING

REPQIQ'T.

LUCIE PLANT - UNITS NOS, 1 AND 2

e. Fish and invertebrate samples are collected from twolocations. Sanqles are collected and analyzed semi-annually. Fish and invertebrate sanqles are analyzed byganma isotopic measurements.

f. Broad leaf vegetation samples are collected from threelocations. Sanqles are collected and analyzed nanthly.Broad leaf vegetation sanqles are analyzed by ganmaisotopic measurements.

Attachment A provides specific information pertaining- to sanqlelocations, types and frequencies.

2. Anal tical Res onsibilit

Radiological environmental monitoring for the St. Lucie Plantis conducted by the State of Florida, Department of Health andRehabilitative Services (DHRS).. Samples are collected andanalyzed 'by EHRS personnel. Sarrqles are analyzed at the IHRSEnvironmental Radiation Control Laboratory in Orlando, Florida.

hhni turin Pro rstn Annual ~gunner provides a sunmary for allspecified sanples collected during the referenced surveillanceperiod. Deviations from the sample schedule, missing data and/orsanqles not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are notedand explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively. Analysis data forall specified sanqles analyzed during the surveillance period isprovided in Attachnent B.

D. Land Use Census: .A land use census out to a distance of 5 milesradius from the St. Lucie Plant is conducted annually to determinethe location of the nearest milk animal, residence, and gar denproducing broad leaf vegetation in each, of the sixteenmeteorological sectors. A summary of the land use census for thesurveillance year is provided'in Table 2, Land Use Census ~Stnmar

No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose comnitment greaterthan the values currently being calculated were identified by theland use census.

No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose comnitment (via thesame exposure pathway) 20 % greater than locations currently beingsampled in the radiological environmental monitoring program wereidentified by the I'and use census.

HP3:1

E. Interlaborator arison Pro ram: The State of FloridaEnvironmental Radiation Control Laboratory participates in theEnvironmental Radioactivity Laboratory Interconqarison StudiesProgram conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency. Resultsfrom the Interlaboratory Comparison Program are provided inAttachment C.

(2)

Page 5: 1985 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept.' · sanqles not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted andall explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively. Analysis

1985A%4.NI. BPQI A@ICAL ENVIEKt4ENI'ALCPERATIf& EKKRT

ST. LU IE PLANT - LNITS N3S. 1 PAD 2

I I I . DlSCUSS ICN PbQ INTEBPRETATICN CF RESLLTS

A. Re ortin of Results: The Annual Radiological EnvirommntaiOperating Report contains the sumaries, interpretations andinforrration required by the St. Lucie Plant, Unit Nos. 1 4 2Technical Specifications. Table 1 provides a sumary of therraasurenants nade for the nuclides required by TechnicalSpecifications, Table 0.12-1, for all san@les- specified by Table

'.12-1.In addition, summaries are provided for other nuclides-identified in the specified sarrples, including those not related tostation operation. These include nuclides such as ~K, 2 2Th,226Ra 225Ra 7Be 238U~ and 210Pb,which are caman in the Floridaenvirorrrant.

B. Inter retation of Results

1. Direct Radiation: The results for direct radiation rranitoringare consistent with past measurements for the specifiedlocations. The exposure rate data shows no indication of any,trends attributed to effluents frcm the plant. The rmasuredexposure rates are consistent with exposure rates that wereobserved during the preop'erational surveillance program.Direct radiation monitoring results are sumarized in Table l.

2. Air Particulates/Radioiodine: The results for radioactive airparticulate and radioiodine monitoring are consistent with pastrreasurern nts and indicate no trends attributed to planteffluents. All sar@les for radioiodine yielded no detectable»II. Game isotopic neasureamnts yielded no indication ofany nuclides attributed to station operation. The results forair particulate/radioiodine sar@les are consistent withmeasurerrents which were nade during the preoperationalsurveillance program. Air particulate and radioiodinemonitoring, results are sumarized in Table 1.

3. Surface Water: The results for radioactivity rnoasurem nts insurface water smples are consistent with past rreasurem nts.Tritiun was reported as present in one of the weekly surfacewater sarryles collected fran Site H-15. Subsequent sarplesindicate there has been no increase nor adverse trend for

HP3:I(3) '

Page 6: 1985 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept.' · sanqles not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted andall explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively. Analysis

tritium in surface water san@les at H15. The measured tritiumwas less than 0.596 of the reporting level specified by planttechnical specifications, Table 3.12-2. No other nuclidesattributed to station operation were detected. Results forsurface water san@les are sumnarized in Table 1.

4. Waterborne Sediment and Food Products: The results forradioactivity measurements in waterborne sediment, fish andcrustacea samples are consistent with past measurements andwith measurements made during the preoperational surveillanceprogram. There were no indications of any radionuclidesattributed to plant effluents. Results for the waterbornesediment, fish and crustacea samples are sunmarized in Table 1.

5. Broad Leaf Ve etation: The results for radioactivitymeasurements in broad leaf vegetation are consistent with pastmeasurements and with measurements made during thepreoperational surveillance program. There were no indicationsof any nuclides attributed to plant effluents. Results for thebroad leaf vegetation samples are sumnarized in Table l.

C. Conclusions

The data obtained through the St. Lucie Plant RadiologicalEnvironmental Monitoring Program verifies that the levels ofradiation and concentrations of radioactive materials inenvironmental samples, representing the highest potential exposurepathways to merrbers of the public, are not being increased. Themeasurements verify that the dose or dose comnitment to me@hers ofthe public, due to operation of St. Lucie Unit Nos. 1 4 2, duringthe surveillance year, are well within "as low as reasonablyachievable (ALARA)" criteria established by 10 CFR 50, Appendix I.

Page 7: 1985 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept.' · sanqles not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted andall explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively. Analysis

TABLE 1

EHVIIQ4%ÃfAL RPQI(XCGICAL MNI1CRIN RKXRPSl A%U'Q. SlMlMCName of Facility St. Lucie i%it Nos. I and 2 Docket No.(s) 50-335 and 50-389

Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida Reporting Period 3anuar 1 - Decerrher 31 1985County, State

Page 1 of 8

Mediun orPathway Sampled

(Vnit ofMeasur nent)

Type and Lower LimitTotal NNrIber ofof Analyses DetectionPerforrred (LLD)

All IndicatorLocationsMean (f)

Range

Location with HighestAnnual Mean

Name Mean (f)Distance R Range

Direction

Control lions Neer ofMean (f) Nonroutine

Range ReportedMeasurern'.nts

DIRECT RAOIATICN

11D(micro-B/hr)

AIRBCRbE

Radioiodines(pCi/rn3)

Exposure rate108d)

1311 212

5.2 (108/108)0.5 - 6.3

0.020 < MR

f4V-10 6.2 (0/0) 6.0 (0/0)10 miles, 14V 6.1 - 6.3 5.7 — 6.1

0

.0

Air Particulates Gross Beta 212 0.0025 0.010 (212/212)(pCi/m3) 0.006-0.030

'Y"Isotopic 20(carposite)

H-086 miles,%4V

0.016 (53/53) 0.010 (53/53)0.006-0.020 ,0.007-0.030

210pb

0.0052

0.012

0.099 (20/20)0.068-0.207

0.012 (0/20)0.007-0.020

0.030 (2/20)0.020-0.000

H-1212 miles, S

H-101 mile, SE

H-302 miles, W

O.i06 (O/O) 0.106 (O/e)0.078-0.230 0.078-0.230

0.020 (I/O) <MM.

O.OOO (I/O)

0.00069 <NCh

137Cs 0.00066 <NM

HP3: 1

Page 8: 1985 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept.' · sanqles not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted andall explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively. Analysis

TABLE 1

EM/IBQ4%RI'AL BPQKUKICALKNIXRII4 PRXBM PÃ4JM SUANRYName of Facility St. Lucie Chit Nos. 1 and 2 Docket No.(s) 50-335 and 50-389

Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida Reporting Period 3anuar I —Decerber 31 1985County, State

Page 2 of 8

Niediun or Type andPathway Sampled Total %aber

(Unit of of AnalysesNieasurerent) - Perfomed

Lower Limitof

Detection(LLD)

All IndicatorLocationsMean (f)

Range

Location arith HighestAnnual Mean .

Name Niean (f)Distance Bc Range

Direction

Control Locations Naker ofShan (f) Nonroutine

Range 'eportedNIeasurerents

WATEKICRK

Surface Water Tritiun 65(pCi/1)

'Y- Isotopic 65

00 K

230

60

IOQ (1/65)

336 (65/65)220-010

H15<1 Mile,ENE/E/ESE

H-15<1 mile,

EbE/E/ESE

IOQ (i/65)

338 (53/65) 329 (12/65)'260-010 220-F00

59F

58~

60Co

65~

95Zr~1311

13ri~

< MR

8 <MR

rr < MR

< MR

8 <MR

7 <hH

5 <MR

5 <MR

< MR

< MA.

< MR

< MR

< MR

< ALA

< MR

< MR

-0

0

Page 9: 1985 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept.' · sanqles not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted andall explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively. Analysis

TAKE 1

RIVIRQ4%RfALRADICHKICALMNIXRIPG RKCBM PÃ4NL SUNPRYone of Facility St. Lucie tRit Nos. 1 and 2 Docket No.(s) 50-335 and 50-389

Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida Reporting Period 3anuar 1 - Decker 31 1985County, State

Page 3 of 8

Mediun orPathway Sampled

(Wit ofMeasurerrent) .

Type andTotal Nmberof AnalysesPerfornl.d

Lower Limitof

Detect ion(ua)

All IndicatorLocationsMean (f)

Range

Location arith HighestAnnual MeanName'ean (f)

Distance Cc RangeDirection

Control Locations Nmher ofMean (f) Nonroutine

Range Repor tedShasurenants

Surface Water Cs(pCi/1)

1~0aa-r

Sed irren t(pCi/kg,dry)

Y- Isotopic 0

226Ra

100 290 (0/0)170-030

190 (0/0)172-210

H-151 mile,

BK/E/ESE

H-151 mile,

EPE/E/ESE

000 (2/2)360-030

198 (2/2)185-210

180 (2/2)170-200

182 (2/2)172-191

0

232Th 52 51 (3/O)00-62

H-5910 - 20 milesS/SE

62 (1/2) 62 (1/2)

Page 10: 1985 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept.' · sanqles not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted andall explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively. Analysis

TABLE 1

BNIIKMi%ÃfALRAQICXCGICALNCNIKRIbG RKGRM RC4JAL RUBYName of Facility St. Lucie Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Docket No.(s) 50-335 and 50-389

Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida Reporting Period 3anuar 1 —Decenher 31 1985County, State

Page 0 of 8

Nhdiun or Type andPathway Sampled Total Nmher

(Unit of of AnalysesNhasureoant) Performed

Lower Limitof

Detect ion(LLD)

All IndicatorLocationsM a (f)

Range

Location with HighestAnnual Mean

Name Mean (f)Distance 4 Range

Direction

ControlLocations

Number ofShan (f) Nonroutine

Range ReportedMeasurenents

Sedirrent(pCi/kg, dry)

INRUN'ICN

238U

137Cs

12

12

288 (2/0)270-306

< NM

< NM

< NM

< NM

H-5910-20 milesS/SE

306 (1/2) 306 (1/2)

NM

MR

blM

5/M

Crustacea(pCi/kg,wet)

Isotopic

130 2000(0/0)1600-2300

H-59 2150 (2/2) 2150 (2/2)10-20 miles 2000-2300 2000-2300S/SE

226Ra 20 105 (3/0)86-120

H-15<1 mileENE/E/ESE

110 (1/2) 103 (2/2)86-120

HP3:1

Page 11: 1985 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept.' · sanqles not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted andall explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively. Analysis

TABLE 1

Page 5 of 8

RWIKNiKHTALRADICILCGICALMNIKRIMPRXBPSI Pbt4NL SUN(BYNam. of Facilit'y St. Lucie Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Docket No.(s) 50-335 and 50-389

Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida Reporting Period 3anuar 1 —Decarber 31 1985County, State

Mediun orPathway Sarrpled

(Unit ofNiasurenent)

Type andTotal Nmberof AnalysesPerformed

Lower Limit All Indicatorof Locations

Detection Mean (f)(LLD) Range

Location with HighestAnnual Mean

Nane Mea (f)Distance R Range

Direction

Control Locations Nmrber ofShan (f) Nonroutine

Range ReportedMeasurerents

Crustacea(pCi/kg,vet) 228Ra 100(1/O) H59

10-20 miles,S/SSE

100(1/2) 100(1/2)

232Th

59Fe

65Zn

137Cs

30

16

10

17

86.(2/0)

< NM

< tUM

< NM

< NM

< MH,

< NM

< NM

H-5910-20 milesS/SSE

101 (1/2) 101 (1/2)

NM

NM

MH.

hM

AM

MH,

NM

HP3:1

Page 12: 1985 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept.' · sanqles not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted andall explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively. Analysis

TABLE I

ENVIKNiKNTALRAQICUXICALMNIXRI¹I%Q2bW WRJM. 5I|PRY-Name of Facility St. Lucie Unit Nos. I and 2 Docket No.(s) 50-335 and 50-389

Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida Reporting Period 3anuar I - December 31 1985County, State

Page 6 of 8

Mediun or Type and Lower Limit All IndicatorPathway Sampled Total Nwher of Locations

(Unit of of Analyses Detection Mean (f)NLasurerent) Performed (ua) Range

Location with HighestAnnual NLan

Hare Mean (f)Distance 4 Range

Direction

Control Locations NUmber ofMean (f) Nonroutine

Range ReportedMeasurerrents

IMZSTICN

Fish(pCi/kg,wet)

Y - Isotopic 6

59Fe

, 60G

65Zn

137Cs

130

16

10

17

2750 (6/6)2000-3000

NM

h/M

NM

hjM

< NM

H-5910-20 milesS/SSE

3000 (2/2)3000-3000

< h/M

< NM

h/M

< NM

< NM

< NM

< NM

3000 (2/2)3000-3000

NM

NM

h/M

NM

NM

NM

HP3: 1

Page 13: 1985 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept.' · sanqles not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted andall explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively. Analysis

TAKE 1

RWIKHHKfALRAQIQXGICALKNIKRIhGPKXBPSl lMlNLSUM|IV(Name of Facility St. Lucie Unit Nos. I and 2 Docket No.(s) 50-335 and 50-359

Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida Reporting Period 3anuar 1 —Decerher 31 1985County, State

Page 7 of 8

Median orPathway Sar@led

(Unit ofMeasurerent)

Type andTotal Nwherof AnalysesPerformed

Lower Limit AlI Indicatorof LocationsDetection- Mean (f)

(tm) Range

Location with HighestAnnual Mean

Name Mean (f)Distance R Range

Direction

Control Locations Naker of. Mean (f) Nonroutine

Range ReportedMeasureoants

IMZSTICN

Broad leafvegetation(pCi/kg,wet)

Y - Isotopic 36

71 620 (36/36)290-1270

~ H-521 mileS/SSE

630 (12/12)310-1270

610 (12/12)290-1070

0

210pb

100 2580 (36/36)1700-0500

500 (1/36)

H-511 mileN/NV

H-511 mile

N/MV

2730 (12/12) 2300 (12/12)1700-0500 1700-3000

500 (1/12) -<NM

1311

137Cs

HP3: 1

Page 14: 1985 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept.' · sanqles not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted andall explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively. Analysis

TABLE l

Page 8 of 8

a0 The LID is an "a priori" lower limit of detection which establishesthe srrallest concentration of radioactive rraterial in a sample thatwill yield a net count, above systen background, that will be detectedwith 9W probability, with only W probability of falsely concludingthat a blank ob'servation represents a real signal..

LLD's in this colum are at tirre of rraasurem nt. The NMs reported inattachnent B for the individual smples have been corrected to thetirN. of sample collection.

'b. Nhan and range based upon detectable rraasurements only. Fraction ofdetectable measurem nts at specified locations is indicated inparentheses (f).

C ~ Specific identifying information for each sarple location is providedin Attactnant - A. U

d. Results are based upon the average net response of two TLDs.(Thermoluninescent dosimeters).

ldll refers to minirrxm detectable activity

HP3: I

Page 15: 1985 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept.' · sanqles not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted andall explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively. Analysis

1985ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT

ST. LUCIE, UNIT NOS. 1 R 2

Page 1 of 1

TABLE lA

DEVIATICNS/MISSING MTA

Date Location Descri tion of Problen Deviation(s) Corrective Action

09/20/85 H-34 Air sampler motor circuitbreaker tripped approx-irrately 80 hours intothe 168 hour samplingperiod; suspected resultof severe weather

Sampling not continuous Reset breaker upondetection of fault

10/01/85

07/12/85—07/19/85

H-08 Air sampler pump failure(R replacement) duringsampling interval.Sar@le acquired was8%6 of typical sarylevolura

TLD's fell frcrn theirholder

Sampling not continuous

Site S-5 was withoutcontinuous rranitoring frcm07/16 - 07/19/85

Replaced air pumpupon detection offailure

AD's were recoveredfran a local resident,returned to the lab forreadout and redeployed tothe field within 3 days

Page 16: 1985 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept.' · sanqles not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted andall explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively. Analysis

1985ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT

ST. LUCIE, UNIT NOS. 1 R 2

TABLE IB

Page 1 of 1

AfNLYSES WI1H LLDs ABOVE TABLE 0.12-1 DE1'ECTICN CAPABILITIES1/1 85 - 12/31 85

Date S leT e Location Radionuclide Table 0.12-1 LlD Reason for Deviation

The values specified in Table 0.12-3, Detection Capabilities, were achieved for all samples.

HP3: 1

Page 17: 1985 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept.' · sanqles not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted andall explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively. Analysis

1985A%LPL RADICLCGICAL ENVIRQ4iENIALCPBRTIPG REKRT

ST. LLCIE PLANT - LNITS K5. 1 PAD 2

TABLE 2

LAN) USE CENSUS

DISTAKZ lQ &&%%ST

Sector

6/85Milk (c)Anirral

6/85Residence

6/85'Garden (d)

N p(e)

SE

SSE

WRY

L(f)

L

3.8/255

0.5/266

L

1.5/Iel

3.7/152(S)

3.2/191

2.2/213

1.9/236

1.9/2<5(h)

1.9/260

2.3/281

3.5/300

L

L

3.1/195

1.9/230

1.9/253

2.0/260

3.3/301

3.7/306

L

HP3: 1

Page 18: 1985 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept.' · sanqles not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted andall explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively. Analysis

1985PbNLPL RPDICUXICAL ENYIIKt4KNI'ALCPEBAT IM I EKRT

ST. LLCIE PLANI' LNITS bDS. 1 ND 2

TPBLE 2 N3fES"

LAN3 USE CENSUS

(a) All categories surveyed out to 5 miles radius fran the St. Lucie Plant

(b) The following forrrat is used to denote the location:

distance (miles)/bearing (degrees)

For example, a resi'dence located in the southeast sector at a distanceof 1.5 miles bearing 101 degrees is recorded as 1.5/101.

(c) Potential milk anirral locations. All locations specified have beenverified to be not producing milk for huran consurption. (Nocalculated doseT.

(d) Gardens with an estimated growing area of 500 square feet or rrare.

(e) 0 denotes that the sector area is predcminently an ocean area.

L denotes that the sector'rea is predcminently a land area unoccupiedby the category type.

(g) Other occupied buildings in this sector include the following:

-Fire Station, 1.8/109country Club, 3.0/153

(h) Several residences in this sector are located approximately 1.9 milesfran the St. Lucie Plant.

HP3: 1

Page 19: 1985 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept.' · sanqles not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted andall explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively. Analysis

1985 .

NbLHL RPQICKGICAL ENVIBCMENI'ALCPGRTIIG REKRTST. LU:IE - UNITS K5. 3 AM) 0

ATTPCHMENI'

KEY 1D 5AVPLE UXATICNS

Page 20: 1985 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept.' · sanqles not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted andall explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively. Analysis

Mrect Radfation

Mrect Radiation

Direct Radiate

Mrect Radiation

Direct Radfatim

Mrect Radf ation

Direct Radiatian

Mrect Radiation

Direct Radiation

Mrect Radiation

Direct Radiation

Direct Radiation

Direct Radfatica

Mrect Radiatfon

Mrect Radfation

H-l North oE Blind Creek

QQ-5 South of Pete Stone Creek

RQ-10 C G. Station

fQ-5 Indian Rior Drive at Rio Vista DryW-10 Intersection af SR 68 and SR 607

QQ-2 Ceaeta South of 7107 Indian River DryQQ-5 US-1 at SR 712

QQ-10 SR 70 Mest oE eke

M-2 7609 Indian River Drive

M-5 Oleaatr and r Streets

Q-10 I~ and SR 709

M%-2 8503 Indian Rior Drive

KM-5 Prise Vista Blvd. at Yacht Club

M%-10 Del Rio and Davis Streets

SM-2 9207 Indfan Rior Drive

~5 lS 1 and Vil Creen Drive

%-10 Port St, hocie Blvd. ard Cairo Road

SSM-2 10307 Indian Rior DryPort St. Lucie Blvd. and US 1

SSM-10 Pine Val and Mes tmreland Roads

S-5 13179 Indian River Drive

SNHSSURGED

rterlrterlrterl "

rterlrterlrterlrterlrterlrterl

rterlrterlrterlrterlrterl

rterlrterlrterlrterlrterl

kPHGXIM!GE

DISTMR(aQes

10

10

10

10

Page 21: 1985 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept.' · sanqles not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted andall explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively. Analysis

RADHXOGICALRNVMMWfhLRWEKUNXST+ UJCIE PUHF

Key to Saaple Locations

PAHQAY

) Direct Radiation S-IO IS 1 ad SR 714

Direct Radiation S "10 Indian River Drive and il Run Lane

$8HZSKLIZCl8)

rterlrterl

hPPMXIHNIEDISTMX

ailes

10

10

) Mrect Radiation

Direct Radiation

~ Mrect Radf atfon

Direct Radfatim

SSEH Entra~ of Nettles Island

SSE-10 Elliot MamSE-I South of Cooli Canal

AH2 IJ ~ of Florida-IPAS Ento'h Vero Beach

FPL Substation - SR, StuartT

Smite —near south property lfne

Pbar Line - 7609 Indian Ri~ Drive

Onsite - ht Meteomlagical Taar

ic Ocean vicinity publicmat side of Route hlh

%59 Near south end of Hutchfson Island

Radioiodine &ParticulatesRadioiodine 4

ParticulatesRadfoiodfne C

ParticulatesRadioiodine 4 .

ParticulatesRadfoiodine C

Particulates

ace Mater(ooeen)

Sediaent Premshorelfne

Surface Mater(ocean)

Sediaent Fanshoreline

rterlrterl

~arterlxterl

Meekly

Seai&nrual ly

Honthly

Seat~rually

10

19

12

10-20

S

N

S/SSE

* Denotes Control SenpIe

Page 22: 1985 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept.' · sanqles not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted andall explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively. Analysis

RhDIOUSICAL MfIIAH?NEhLQRVEKLhMXST+ UJCIE HlHF

Key to Saople Locations =

-'ifMNFood Products

F Pmfucts

Ocean side vicinity of St Lucie Plant

QHPlZSKUZCfH)Crustacea

Fish-Broad leafver tation

Seark-hnmallySerxt~raall

Honthly(when available)

Ofisite near south property line

Near south end of Hutchirson Island

Broad Iaafvegetation(au ove)Crustacea

FishBroad leaf~tion

Monthly(when available)

Seat-hruuallySrmri~nually

Honthly

* Denotes control saaple

Page 23: 1985 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept.' · sanqles not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted andall explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively. Analysis

gi

I

0

eiOee

Cs/

ta»'t/ »«ule«OQ ~a

Is

FP a L'sPROPERT Y~LINE

~ g 'f~ eI

KilH51

8I.WO lR

VgVV

Vga

~ 04

WNF-2'|

) I

~ "n/,„

%el

C4P

C

Ia

Inset Octa!ItiD

Oy pOD

<( I

n

\ 4

~+see

e<

{

+~LH15

'

! Hah EXCLUSION AREA {0.97m')AKO LOW

POPULATION ZONE {Imi)

UNI T I

UIIIT 2

z.QlQQp

f~J4 ~

~ ~~ 4

"«~4EiK~SE-1"

+a~

» ~~%

MSW-2~\

~ ~

paJt

~

~ )%/I/

'

RHRSz

(l) lrKhyxtriRahasta))alamo Mat

(2) Iha to the Scale of thaPLyaa tha hehaLce AreaRadix (0 9l mLlea) ml thaIoe ~alaticis Zcaa (1 aQa)Aza Shoto' brag the «ma aLxeD

(3) %e foUactrg are taueatrtccel ~(a) A11 ~arIagra (Hetaera Bay', Etg

Nak~ Taken Rt~) ~tha eaepcLm of tha Eatable m4dfsdtaqya aeal

Os) OaaarL fmat baachee(o) State Boat Alh

0

FPSL sPROPERTYLINE

V?~ ~

)

'H14 5

'H52

I ~ 0V

0a»s ~4 VV

FLORIDA POWER 8 LIGHT COMPANYST. LUCIE PLANT

SCALE IN MILES SITE AREA MAP

FIGURE 5.i.i

Page 24: 1985 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept.' · sanqles not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted andall explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively. Analysis

1985%5UAL RPOI UXiICAL ENVIBQ4KNTALCf'ERATIN REKRT

ST. UCIE PLEAT - UNITS K5. 3 PbD 0

ATTFCHMENf B

RADICUXICAL SLRVE ILLA'FFLCRICA KNBK PbD LI(ÃfCCM'Eblis'S

ST. LU:IE SITE

1985

First Quarter, 1985Second Quarter, 1985Third Quarter, 1985Fourth Quarter, 1985