15-05-0125-01-004a€¦ · xls file · web view · 2011-07-13thales communications &...

802.5.4a ALT PHY Proposals Mandatory Operating Mode SummaryMerged Proposal Reference # A B CProposal Descriptor Eureca (A) Eureca (B) Chaotic-UWBDoc. NumberOperating Frequency Band(s) 3.1-10.6/2.4 GHz 3.1-10.6 GHz 3.1 - 5.1 GHzModulation Technique IR-UWB M-TOK-UWB COOK-WBData Rate/Throughput 250 kb/s 250 kbps 250 kbpsGlobally certifiable No No NoRanging accuracy .56 m ~ 1 m 0.37 mEnhanced Mobility (> 5.1 m/s) DNP DNP DNPOperating Range (@ 250 kbps) 30 m 50 m 30 mOperating Range (@ 1 mbps) 30 m 25 m 30 mSOPs DNP 84 4

FDMA channels DNP 14 2CDMA channels DNP 6 2

CCA supported DNP No DNPSignal Acquisition Time on wakeup 50 µs DNP DNPPotentially Interoperable w 802.15.4? No No NoAvg Transmit Power (dBm) -10.6 dBm -14.3 -8.75Minumum Eb/No 14 8 20Link Margin 9.6 3 2.85Required Rx Sensitivity -94.0 -91.3 -85.4Digital Area/Gate Count DNP DNPAnalog Area DNP DNP

05/0130-r0 05/0113-r2 05/0132-r0

0.3 mm2

0.5 mm2

ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/05/15-05-0130-00-004a-stm-cea-leti-cwc-aetherwire-mitsubishi-tdc-harris-ftrd-15-4acfp-response.ppt

ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/05/15-05-0113-02-004a-merged-uwb-proposal-ieee-802-15-4a-alt-phy.ppt

ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/05/15-05-0132-00-004a-merged-proposal-chaotic-uwb-system-802-15-4a.pdf

C3

Proposal A - Doc. 05/0130-rX Aether Wire & Location CEA-LETI CWC-University of Oulu France Telecom R&D Harris Corporation Mitsubishi Electronic Research Laboratories STMicroelectronics Time Domain Proposal B - Doc. 05/0113-rX Create-Net & China UWB Forum Institute for Infocomm Research General Atomics KERI & SSU & Korean UWB Industry Applications Staccato Communications Tennessee Technological University Thales Communications & Cellonics Wisair

D3

Proposal A - Doc. 05/0130-rX Aether Wire & Location CEA-LETI CWC-University of Oulu France Telecom R&D Harris Corporation Mitsubishi Electronic Research Laboratories STMicroelectronics Time Domain Proposal B - Doc. 05/0113-rX Create-Net & China UWB Forum Institute for Infocomm Research General Atomics KERI & SSU & Korean UWB Industry Applications Staccato Communications Thales Communications & Cellonics Wisair

E3

Doc. 05/0132-rX Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI)-KAIST-HGU, Samsung Electronics (DM), The Samsung Electronics(SAIT)-IRE-Samsung ElectroMechanics, Simon Fraser University-Inha University

C7

BPPM with BPSK

D7

Multiband Ternary Orthogonal Keying - UWB

Mandatory Operating Mode Summary 802.5.4a ALT PHY ProposalsD E F Merged Proposal Reference #

DS/CS-UWB DBO-CSS WM-UWB Proposal DescriptorDoc. Number

3.1-10.6/2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz 3.1-10.6 GHz Operating Frequency Band(s)DS-UWB/CSS CSS OOK or BPSK Modulation Technique

1 Mbps 1 Mbps 8 Mbps ThroughputNo Yes No Globally certifiable

0.3 m <1 m DNP Ranging accuracy10.7 m/s 1000 m/s DNP Enhanced Mobility (>11 MPH)

DNP 30 m 30 m Operating Range10 m 30 m 30 m Operating RangeDNP 28 64 SOPsDNP 7 16 FDMA channelsDNP 4 4 CDMA channelsDNP Yes DNP CCA supportedDNP 32 µs DNP Signal Acquisition Time on wakeupNo Yes, Option No Interoperable with 802.15.4-2003

-10.5 dBm 10 dBm 6.25 Minumum Eb/No 6.25 12.5 6.2522.7 31.8 17.6 Link Margin-97.7 -91.5 97.3 Required Rx SensitivityDNP DNP RobustnessDNP DNP interferers

multipathScalable (BW / Throughput / Power)

05/0127-r0 05/0126-r0 05/0028-r2

1.0 mm2

3.66 mm2

ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/05/15-05-0127-00-004a-merged-proposal-ds-uwb-with-optional-cs-uwb-un-uwb-band-ieee-802-15-4a.pdf

ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/05/15-05-0126-00-004a-nanotron-orthotron-chirp-merged-proposal.ppt

ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/05/15-05-0028-02-004a-waveform-modulated-low-rate-uwb-system-proposal-15-4a-alt-phy.ppt

F3

Doc. 05/0127-rX CRL, Hitachi - YRP_UNL Decawave Freescale Semiconductor NICT - Fujitsu - OKI Tennessee Technological University Wide Band Accesss

G3

DOC. - 05/0126-rX Nanotron Technologies Orthotron

H3

Doc. 05/0028-rX Cal State U. - Sacramento

F4

Direct Spread Spectrum UWB with Chirp Spread Spectrum option

G4

Differentially Bi-Orthogonal Chirp Spread Spectrum

H4

Waveform Modulated UWB

F7

Phase differentially encoded BPSK

G17

Energy Detection & Carrier Detection

"Best" Mode Operating SummaryA B C D E F

Eureca (A) Eureca (B) Chaotic-UWB DS/CS-UWB DBO-CSS WM-UWB

IR-UWB M-TOK-UWB CSS

05/0130-r0 05/0113-r2 05/0132-r0 05/0127-r0 05/0126-r0 05/0028-r2







K3


L3


M3


N3


O3


P3

Doc. 05/0028-rX Cal State U. - Sacramento

N4


O4

Differentially Bi-Orthogonal Chirp Spread Spectrum

P4


K7

Impulse Radio UWB

L7

Multiband Ternary Orthogonal Keying - UWB

IEEE Standards Association 802.15.4a Alt PHY Proposal Categorization Matrix

Executive Summary Note: The original data columns for all 26 proposals are still in the matrix, just hidden.

Proposal Order Sort Key (Manual) IR-UWB

Proposal Reference Number A

Proposal Reference Name "Handle" Eureca (A)

Proposal Advocate(s) Company / Affiliation See Comment

Proposer Contact name

Proposer Contact Address email

DCN

Supplementary Documentation DCN

Date of DCN

Date

Date

Key Categorization Feature Categories

Modulation Type (row 20)

4a Task Group Reference #

Lead Author / Team Representative

IEEE 802.15.4a Categorization Document Version

05/0130-r0

Date of Document Version used for CategorizationCategorization Reviewed by ProposerCategorization Reviewed by 4a Cat team


D5

This row initially used to sort proposals according to the modulation type

F6

Proposal Withdrawn

D7

Preliminary Assignment by 4a Cat Team

J8


D11

IEEE 802.15 document control number including revision on which table entries are based.

D17

Note that these table entries are primarily for CATEGORIZATION purposes to facilitate Task Group consensus on a consolidated set of proposals. Assessment of proposal completeness provides some perspective on work remaining to move a proposal forward.

Main Proposal Descriptors DNP

Band Hz DNP

Modulation Type DNP

SoP Total # DNP

DNP

# of Codes DNP

kb/s DNP

Detection Method Coherent/non-coherent DNP

Synchronization Mechanism DNP

Ranging Technique TOF, TDOA, etc. DNP

Clock Error / Oscillator Tolerance ppm DNPProposal Completeness Full / Partial DNP

SCD # Categorization / Description Measure3.1.2

a) major external components # of components DNPb) Digital circuitry DNP

c) Gate count estimates # of digital logic gates DNPd) Semiconductor process Si, SiGe, CMOS DNP

linewidth (e.g. 0.13 µ) DNP

month / year DNP

Defining Technologies / Techniques

IR-UWB / CSS / DS-UWB / TH-UWB

Simultaneously operating Piconets (SoP) TotalFrequency Division Mulitple Access (FDMA)

# of Frequency Channels

Code Division Mulitple Access (CDMA)Nominal Payload Bit Rate, X0

Tone, non-synchronized,

differential

Unit Manufacturing Cost/Complexity:

% of total integrated circuit area

e) Semiconductor process feature sizef) Year specified process technologies available

D20

CSS = Chirp Spread Spectrum DCSK = Differential Chaotic Shift Keying DS (DSS, DSSS) = Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum IR = Impulse Radio TH = Time Hopping TR = Transmitted Reference UWB = Ultra wide Band

D27

TOF = Time of Flight TDOA = Time Differential of Arrival -OWR = one-way ranging

B32

Based on SCD version 802.15-04-0232-17-004a

D32

Note that these table entries are primarily for CATEGORIZATION purposes to facilitate Task Group consensus on a consolidated set of proposals. Assessment of proposal completeness provides some perspective on work remaining to move a proposal forward.

C33

Per SCD 3.1.1 estimates must include all optional functionality used in the specification.

D34

see proposal for details

D36

total gates for full function radio

g) Digital die size estimate DNPh) Analog circuitry DNP

DNP

j) Semiconductor process DNP

linewidth (e.g. 0.13 µ) DNP

month / year DNP

m) Analog die size estimate DNPYes / No DNP

3.2.1

kb/s DNP

kb/s DNP

kb/s DNP

kb/s DNP

kb/s DNP

f) Duty Cycle Factor Percentage DNP

3.2.2 Error Rate% (2 signif. digits) DNP

3.2.3 Receiver Sensitivity:dBm DNP

dBm DNP

3.2.5 Band in Use

mm2 at __ feature size% of total integrated

circuit areai) Functional block/component estimates

# of Analog functions design blocks

Bipolar, SiGe, GaAs, SAW

k) Semiconductor process feature sizel) Year specified process technologies available

mm2 at __ feature sizen) Any New or Emerging Technology?

PHY-SAP Payload Bit Rate and Throughput:

a) X0 = nominal payload bit rate

b) Xi = optional payload bit rate

c) Y0 = nominal aggregated data rate at collector device

d) Yi = optional aggregated data rate at collector device

e) T0 = Peer-to-Peer Data Throughput

PER = Maximum Packet Error Rate (32 octet PSDU*)

a) Input power level required for 1% PER at X0

b) Input power level required for 1% PER at Xi

D40

Default size of 1 represents all digital IC solution

D42

total gates for full function radio

D46

default entry is zero (i.e. all digital )

C49

based on 32 Byte PSDU … per SCD 5.4

C54

including normal overhead associated with packet transmission after connection is established &running

C55

in Normal operating mode

C58

At the PHY-SAP interface after any proposed error correction methods have been applied. *unless otherwise specified

C60

at the receiver input in AWGN environment at the spec'd bit rate. See SCD clause 5.6.3 for calculations

D60

The minimum practical sensitivity is determined by the maximum allowable regulatory compliant signal level at the maximum specified free space distance

C61

assume 0 dBi antenna gain with a loss factor of 3 dB

a) Nominal Center Frequency Hz DNP

b) Bandwidth Hz DNP

3.3 Signal Robustness3.3.1

DNP

DNP

3.3.4 Interference Susceptibility DNP

a) Microwave Oven: DNP

b) IEEE802.15.1: DNP

c) IEEE802.11b,g: DNP

d) IEEE802.15.3: DNP

e) IEEE802.11a: DNP

f) IEEE802.15.4: DNP

dB DNP

dB DNP

i) Minimum out-of-band rejection dB DNP

3.3.7 Coexistence:dB DNP

dB DNP

Coexistence & Interference Mitigation Techniques

a) Adjustable Interference Ingress Mitigation Attributes

List available options (if any)

b) Adjustable Interference Egress Mitigation Attributes

List available options (if any)

At X0 , dint = 1 meter, is PER < 1% ?

Yes / dint-1% / Unknown






g) Tolerated in-band Modulated Interferenceh) Tolerated in-band Tone Interference

a) Average 802.15.1 Interfering Power at 1m b) Average 802.15.1 Interfering Power at 0.3m

D70

e.g. freq channel selection, switching to more robust code, selective FEC, etc.

D73

Minimum distance criterion: Proposed system should be able to operate at target Xo with less than 1% PER when the listed interference source is 1 meter away from the system.

D74

If, at Xo, the PER > 1% when operating at 6dB above the proposed system's receiver sensitivity as listed in 3.2.1, then list minimum separation distance needed to achieve PER <=1%

C82

from Intentional or Unintentional Radiator

C84

this criterion specifically targets 802 victim receivers operating in the band proposed for 4a

C85

as received by a 0 dbi antenna at a victim receiver located the specified distance from the 15.4a transmitter

C86


dB DNP

dB DNP

dB DNP

dB DNP

dB DNP

dB DNP

dB DNP

dB DNP

Technical Feasibility3.4.1 Manufacturability:

a) Required Clock Tolerance ppm DNP

3.4.2 Time to Market:date DNP

3.4.3 Regulatory Impact:

a) US-FCC Compliance Yes / No / Unclear DNPb) European Compliance Yes / No / Unclear DNPc) Global Compliance Yes / No / Unclear DNP

3.5.2 Scalability:a) Scalable Power Consumption? Yes / No DNP

b) Scalable Payload Bit Rate? Yes / No DNPc) Scalable Data Throughput? Yes / No DNPd) Scalable Complexity? Yes / No DNPe) Scalable Range? Yes / No DNP

Yes / No DNP

Yes / No DNP

3.5.3 Mobility:

c) Average 802.15.3 Interfering Power at 1md) Average 802.15.3 Interfering Power at 0.3me) Average 802.11b,g Interfering Power at 1mf) Average 802.11b,g Interfering Power at 0.3mg) Average 802.11a Interfering Power at 1mh) Average 802.11a Interfering Power at 0.3mi) Average 802.15.4 Interfering Power at 1mj) Average 802.15.4 Interfering Power at 0.3m

a) When will proposed technology be ready for integration

Is proposed RF usage compliant?

f) Scalable Frequency of Operation?g) Scalable Occupied Bandwidth of Operation?

C87


C92


C93


C94


C108

this refers to adjustable proposal parameters that can be varied by the implementer to meet diverse application needs.

D108

Refer to the proposal documents for details

meters/second DNP

(listed / not) in proposal DNP

meters/second DNP

(listed / not) in proposal DNP

4 MAC Protocol SupplementYes / No / Unclear DNP

Yes / No / Unclear DNP

6.0 PHY Layer Criteria5.1 Channel Model Simulations DNP

Yes / No / Partial DNP

DNP

X1 Industrial Environment LOS Yes / No / Partial DNPX2 Indoor Residential LOS (CM1) Yes / No / Partial DNP

X3 Outdoor LOS (CM5) Yes / No / Partial DNPX4 Agricultural Areas Yes / No / Partial DNPX5 Body Area Networks Yes / No / Partial DNPAll Other models Yes / No / Partial DNP

5.2.2 Size and Form Factor:a) Proposed Form Factor List (e.g. SD Memory) DNP

Date / Unknown DNP

5.3.1 µS DNP

µS DNP

µS DNP


a) Maximum Relative Speed for Communicationsb) Comm's Mobility Conditions (PER, X0, etc.)

c) Maximum Relative Speed for Rangingd) Ranging Mobility Conditions (PER, X0, etc)

a) Modifications Required for Additional Featuresb) Modifications Required for Enhanced Operation

Simulation Results Presented?

Antenna Efficiency & Freq. Dependence - FactorsAntenna Efficiency & Freq. Dependence - Basis

Measured / Simulated / Not submitted

b) When will proposed PHY fit into Form Factor?

Payload Bit Rate Timinga) SIFS for Nominal Bitrate X0

b) LIFS for Nominal Bitrate X0

c) Packet Overhead (PHY Preamble* + PHY Header)d) SIFS/LIFS timing provided for optional rates, Xi

D118

5.1 meters/sec is about 11 mph

C129

Antenna frequency dependence is NOT included in the channel model - it must be provided by the proposer

C145

* PHY preamble is the one specified for meeting the SoP performance requirements of section 5.4

5.4.2 Simultaneously Operating Piconets: DNP

a) Number of SoPs # DNPmeters (2 sig digits) DNP

meters (2 sig digits) DNP

5.5.2 Signal Acquisition:

DNP

DNP

DNP

DNP

DNP

DNP


5.5.3 Clear Channel Assessment:

DNP

DNP

DNP

DNP

DNP

DNP

Worst case results from "Best Mode"*

b) Single Co-channel dint (for PER=1% at dref)

c) Multi-Channel dint (for PER=1% at dref)


a) AWGN Preamble False Alarm Probability

Pfa

b) AWGN Preamble Miss Detect Probability

Pmiss

c) Single Piconet Preamble False Alarm Probability

Pfa

d) Single Piconet Preamble Miss Detect Probability

Pmiss

e) Multiple Uncoordinated Piconets Preamble False Alarm Probability

Pfa

f) Multiple Uncoordinated Piconets Preamble Miss Detect Probability

Pmiss

g) Acquisition Process Time Line Provided


a) AWGN CCA False Alarm Probability

Pfa

b) AWGN CCA Miss Detect Probability

Pmiss

c) Single Piconet CCA False Alarm Probability

Pfa

d) Single Piconet CCA Miss Detect Probability

Pmiss

e) Multiple Uncoordinated Piconets CCA False Alarm Probability

Pfa

f) Multiple Uncoordinated Piconets CCA Miss Detect Probability

Pmiss

C148

Error rates are for "uncoordinated" SoP's as defined in SCD section 5.4.1

D148

Complete results for all other combinations of Channel Models and operating modes should be listed in the full proposal document. * See SCD section 6.0

C150

dref is distance between reference transmitter and target receiver at which the receiver power is 6DB above the receiver sensitivity threshold

D153


D162


µS DNP

5.6.2 System Performance

DNP

DNP

meters DNP

5.7.2 Ranging

a) Range Accuracy meters DNPb) Range Acquisition Time seconds DNPc) Range Acquisition Energy Joules DNPd) Mobile Ranging Max Speed meters/second DNP

5.8.2 Link Budgetkb/s DNP

b) Average Tx Power dBm DNPc) Tx Antenna Gain dBi DNPd) Geometric Center Frequency Hz DNPe) Path Loss at 1 meter dB DNPf) Path Loss at 30 meters dB DNP

g) Rx Antenna Gain dBi DNPh) Rx Power dBm DNPi) Average Noise Power per bit N dBm DNPj) Rx Noise Figure Nf dB DNP

dBm DNP

l) Minimum Eb/N0 (S) dB DNPm) Implementation Loss (I) dB DNPn) Link Margin dB DNPo) Proposed Min Rx Sensitivity dBm DNP

5.9.2 SensitivitydBm DNP

5.10.2 Power Management ModesY/N DNP

g) Time Required for Clear Channel Assessment


a) AWGN Probability of Average PERb) Channel Model Probability of Average PERc) Acquisition Distance at specified metrics in 3.2


a) Peak Payload Bit Rate X0

k) Average Total Noise Power per bit Pn

a) Power Level meeting error criterion

a) IEEE802.15.4 Power Management Modes supported?

D171


D176


C186

=sqrt(fmin*fmax)

K195

this number will be updated in the next proposal stage

5.11.2 Power ConsumptionWatts DNP

Watts DNP

Watts DNP

Watts DNP

e) Busy CCA Power Watts DNPf) Idle CCA Power Watts DNPg) PowerSave Mode Power Watts DNPh) Transmit Energy/bit Joules/bit DNPi) Receive Energy/bit Joules/bit DNPj) Peak Current Amps DNP

DNP

5.12 Antenna Practicalitye.g. SD Memory DNP

b) Proposed Antenna Dimensions DNP

6.0 Yes / No / Partial DNP

a) Transmit Power Minimum Frameb) Transmit Power Maximum Framec) Receive Power Minimum Framed) Receive Power Maximum Frame

k) Basis of Power Consumption Values

Calculation / Simulation / Measurement

a) Proposed Antenna Form Factor

mm2

Best Mode Solution Summary Provided

C205

Total Average Power

IEEE Standards Association 802.15.4a Alt PHY Proposal Categorization Matrix Note: The original data columns for all 26 proposals are still in the matrix, just hidden.

M-TOK-UWB COOK-UWB DS/CS-UWB

B C D

Eureca (B) Chaotic -UWB DS/CS-UWB

See Comment See Comment See Comment

05/0113-r2 05/0132-r0 05/0127-r0




AM5


AM7


W8


AH8


AM8


DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNPDNP DNP DNP


DNP DNP DNPDNP DNP DNPDNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

AI24

Estimated from stated "1 bit time frame" = 200 ns divided by eight

AK27

Three counters with interference pattern between two clock times to determine TOA. (see proposal pp 47 - 50)

AP27

requires 3 or more fixed nodes with known position

Z29

no ranging provision


DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP


DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

AQ61

Larry Arnett: Verify Calculation Rcvd Pwr = -90.5 dBm gives 7.6 dB link Margin -> @0 Link Margin -98.1dBm

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNPDNP DNP DNPDNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNPDNP DNP DNPDNP DNP DNPDNP DNP DNPDNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP


DNP DNP DNPDNP DNP DNPDNP DNP DNPDNP DNP DNP


DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP


DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP


DNP DNP DNP




DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

AR188

4a Cat Team believes calcualtion is in error. 74.29-44.75=29.5 30m value should not include 1st meter.

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNPDNP DNP DNPDNP DNP DNPDNP DNP DNPDNP DNP DNPDNP DNP DNPDNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DNP DNP DNP

DBO-CSS DNP

E F

DBO-CSS

See Comment

Soo-Young Chang

Mar 2005


California State University, Sacramento

[email protected]

05/0126-r0 05/0028-r2

mailto:[email protected]



AS8


DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNPDNP DNP

DNP DNPDNP DNP

DNP DNPDNP DNPDNP DNP

DNP DNP

AT23

These are the two most basic upchirp / downchirp modulation schemes - NOT Code-based in the sense of CDMA

AU23

These are the two most basic upchirp / downchirp modulation schemes - NOT Code-based in the sense of CDMA

DNP DNPDNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNPDNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNPDNP DNPDNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNPDNP DNPDNP DNPDNP DNPDNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNPDNP DNP

DNP DNPDNP DNPDNP DNPDNP DNP

DNP DNPDNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNPDNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP


DNP DNP




DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNPDNP DNPDNP DNPDNP DNPDNP DNPDNP DNPDNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

DNP DNP

Order Proposer's Name Stated Company Affiliation

1 Fabrice Legrand Thales Communications2 Mike Tanahashi TRDA/Taiyo Yuden

3 Akira Maeki Central Research Laboratory, Hitachi, Ltd.4 Rick Roberts Harris Corporation5 Ryuji Kohno NICT6 SandLinks7 Ismail Lakkis Wideband Access, Inc.8 Vern Brethour Time Domain

9 Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories10 Paul Popescu France Telecom R&D, LLC11 John Lampe Nanotron Technlologies GmbH 12 Youngjin Park Korea Electrotechnology Research Institu

13 Roberto Aiello Staccato Communications

14 Samsung Electronics 15 Kyung Sup Kwak Inha University/ Simon Fraser University 16 Kyung-Kuk Lee Orthotron17 Francois Chin Institute for Infocomm Research

1819 Naiel Askar General Atomics20 Honggang Zhang Create-Net & China UWB Forum21 Chia-Chin Chong Samsung Electronics 22 Matt Welborn Freescale Semiconductor23 Soo-Young Chang California State University, Sacramento

24

25 Tennessee Technological University26 Gadi Shor Wisair

Dani Raphaeli

Andy Molisch, Philip Orlik

Namhyong Kim, Inhwan Kim

Philippe Rouzet, Patrick Houghton, Laurent Ouvry

STMicroelectronics, Aether Wire & Location, CEA

Cheolhyo Lee ETRI (Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute)

Robert Caiming Qiu, Ph.D.

Proposer's Email Document #

[email protected] [email protected] 05-0015r02

[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 05-0013r01

[email protected], [email protected]@rd.francetelecom.com [email protected] [email protected] 05-0033r01

[email protected]

[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 05-0032r02

[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]@ga.com [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 05-0028r01

[email protected] 05-0010r04

[email protected] [email protected] 05-0012r04


ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/05/15-05-0008-01-004a-thales-uwb-ir.ppt


ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/05/15-05-0015-02-004a-taiyoyudentrda-small-form-factor-ceramic-antenna.ppt


ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/04/15-04-0715-02-004a-hitachi-ds-uwb-ir-proposal-4a.ppt


ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/05/15-05-0006-01-004a-harris-cfp-response.ppt


ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/04/15-04-0716-01-004a-nict-fujitsu-oki-pulsed-ds-uwb-with-optional-cs-uwb.pdf


ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/05/15-05-0052-01-004a-symbol-interleaved-impulse-radio-cfp-presentation.ppt


ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/05/15-05-0026-03-004a-dsss-uwb-radio-system.ppt


ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/05/15-05-0013-01-004a-time-domain-cfp-response.ppt

mailto:[email protected],%[email protected]

ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/05/15-05-0005-00-004a-mitsubishi-electrics-time-hopping-impulse-radio-standards-presentation.ppt


ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/05/15-05-0014-02-004a-ft-proposal.ppt


ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/05/15-05-0002-01-004a-nanotron-chirp-spread-spectrum-css-phy-presentation.ppt


ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/05/15-05-0033-01-004a-enhanced-noncoherent-ook-uwb-phy-and-mac-positioning-and-ranging.ppt


ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/04/15-04-0704-02-004a-staccato-uwb-phy-proposal.ppt


ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/05/15-05-0042-00-004a-samsung-dm-chaos-range-estimationfinal.ppt


ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/05/15-05-0020-02-004a-mcsk-bppm-based-impulse-radio.pdf


ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/05/15-05-0025-03-004a-dbo-csk-proposal-4a.pdf


ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/05/15-05-0032-02-004a-proposed-code-sequences-modulation-coding-ieee-802-15-4a-alt-phy.ppt

mailto:[email protected],%[email protected],%[email protected]

ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/05/15-05-0011-01-004a-stm-cea-leti-cwc-aetherwire-15-4acfp-response.ppt


ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/05/15-05-0016-02-004a-general-atomics-cfp-response.pdf


ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/05/15-05-0019-01-004a-impulsive-direct-sequence-uwb-wireless-networks-with-node-cooperation-relaying.pdf


ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/05/15-05-0030-02-004a-samsung-electronics-sait-cfp-presentation.pdf


ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/05/15-05-0021-01-004a-low-rate-ds-uwb-tg4a.ppt




ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/05/15-05-0010-04-004a-chaotic-pulse-based-communication-system-proposal.ppt


ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/05/15-05-0003-00-004a-alternative-uwb-system-physical-layer-proposal-802-15-4a.pdf


ftp://ieee:[email protected]/15/05/15-05-0012-04-004a-wisair-cfp-response-presentation.ppt

Please check the latest status of proposals for accuracy and completenessMatrix Jason

3 A3 A x3 A (4) Harris Corporation 3 A (8) Time Domain 3 A (9) MERL 3 A (10) France Telecom R&D 3 A (18) ST Micro/Aether Wire & Location 4 B4 B x4 B (1) Thales Communications 4 B (12) KERI/Korean UWB Industry Application Standardization Forum 4 B (13) Staccato Communications4 B (17) Institute for Infocomm Research 4 B (19) General Atomics 4 B (20) Create-Net & China UWB Forum4 B4 B (26) Wisair2 C2 C x2 C (14) Samsung Electronics 2 C (15) Inha University/Simon Fraser University 2 C (21) Samsung Electronics 2 C (24) ETRI 5 D5 D x5 D (3) Hitachi 5 D (5) NICT 5 D (7) Wideband Access

Decawave(22) Freescale Semiconductor

5 D (25) Tennessee Technological University1 E1 E x1 E (11) Nanotron 1 E (16) Orthotron

802.15.4a PHY Proposals - Updated 9 March, 2005

Merged Proposal A: 4, 8, 9, 10, 18 - Document # 05/0130r0

Merged Proposal B: 1, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26 - Document # 05/0113r1

Merged Proposal C: 14, 15, 21, 24 - Document # 05/0132r0

Merged Proposal D: 3, 5, 7, 22- Document # 05/0127r0

Merged Proposal E: 11, 16 - Document # 05/0126r0

6 F6 F x

Withdrawn: (2) Taiyo Yuden R&D

Resources:

Jason Ellis15.4a vice-chairman

Did not submit

2nd proposal SandLinks: 6

- Document # California State University, Sacramento: 23

- Document # 05/0028r2

15.4a webpage: http://www.ieee802.org/15/pub/TG4a.html Down-selection procedure: ftp://ftp.802wirelessworld.com/15/04/15-04-0247-03-004a-tg4a-down-selection-voting-procedure.doc

http://www.ieee802.org/15/pub/TG4a.html

ftp://ftp.802wirelessworld.com/15/04/15-04-0247-03-004a-tg4a-down-selection-voting-procedure.doc

Please check the latest status of proposals for accuracy and completenessEURECAProposal A - Doc. 05/0130-rXAether Wire & LocationCEA-LETICWC-University of OuluFrance Telecom R&DHarris CorporationMitsubishi Electronic Research LaboratoriesSTMicroelectronicsTime DomainProposal B - Doc. 05/0113-rX

(12) KERI/Korean UWB Industry Application Standardization Forum Create-Net & China UWB ForumInstitute for Infocomm ResearchGeneral AtomicsKERI & SSU & Korean UWB Industry ApplicationsStaccato CommunicationsThales Communications & CellonicsWisair

802.15.4a PHY Proposals - Updated 9 March, 2005

15.4a webpage: http://www.ieee802.org/15/pub/TG4a.html Down-selection procedure: ftp://ftp.802wirelessworld.com/15/04/15-04-0247-03-004a-tg4a-down-selection-voting-procedure.doc

http://www.ieee802.org/15/pub/TG4a.html


Down-selection procedure: ftp://ftp.802wirelessworld.com/15/04/15-04-0247-03-004a-tg4a-down-selection-voting-procedure.doc


12 fc values are not consistent across the proposals3 use of GHz instead fo exponents is inconsistent - how do we want to do it?4 any interest in noting and sharing what appear to be "best" practices from the various proposals?5 the link budget graphic in some proposals is a hodge-podge of objects grouped together to look like a real table - can we offer a template that would facilitate editing?

SCD Criteria3.1 Unit Manufacturing Complexity A +3.4 Technical Feasibility A +3.5 Scalability A +5.1 Power Management & Modes A +5.11 Power Consumption A +5.2 Size and Form Factor A +

5.3.1 A +

5.4 Simultaneous Operating Piconets A +5.6 System Performance A +5.7 Ranging A +5.8 Link Budget A +5.9 Sensitivity A +

Should we call out nominal fc for Row 65 and geometric fc for row 186?

Importance Level

Proposer Response

PHY-SAP Payload Bit Rate and Data Throughput

any interest in noting and sharing what appear to be "best" practices from the various proposals?the link budget graphic in some proposals is a hodge-podge of objects grouped together to look like a real table - can we offer a template that would facilitate editing?

393.5Farm9

27Industrial NLOS8

421Industrial LOS7

75Outdoor NLOS6

421Outdoor LOS5

20.6Office NLOS4

1610Office LOS3

8.2Resid. hard NLOS (concrete walls*)

2

394Resident. LOS1

Distance [m]Type of ChannelCM

393.5

27

421

75

421

20.6

1610

8.2

394

Distance [m]

15-05-0125-01-004a€¦ · xls file · web view · 2011-07-13thales communications &...

Documents