13 towards mobile web accessibility evaluation

15
FOSS-AMA Satellite event Rogério Bandeira FFCUL Portugal

Upload: aegis-accessible-projects

Post on 08-May-2015

2.612 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

DESCRIPTION

In this presentation we present a new approach to mobile Web accessibility evaluation, allowing for Mobile Web adequacy and Web content accessibility evaluation regarding different selectable disability profiles. We define an evaluation approach based on the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), Mobile Web Best Practices (MWBP) and Barrier Walkthrough, with the goal of providing support to Web developers and designers to conduct rapid, yet specialized, accessibility assessments focused on different disability types for Web sites tailored to mobile devices. We also present a mobile Web accessibility evaluation tool that has been developed as a proofof- concept of our approach. This work was developed on the content of ACCESSIBLE “Accessibility Assessment Simulation Environment for New Applications Design and Development”, a three year STREP Project of the 7th EU Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development (FP7), that aims to define an overall European Assessment Simulation Environment making extensive use of the latest available IT technologies and concepts.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 13 Towards Mobile Web Accessibility Evaluation

FOSS-AMASatellite event

Rogério BandeiraFFCUL

Portugal

Page 2: 13 Towards Mobile Web Accessibility Evaluation

27-28 March 2010, Paphos, Cyprus

FOSS-AMASatellite event

Roger
AccessibilityMobility
Page 3: 13 Towards Mobile Web Accessibility Evaluation

27-28 March 2010, Paphos, Cyprus

FOSS-AMASatellite event

Improve◦ Accessibility & Mobile Adequacy

Support ◦ developers, designers, experts

Integrate◦ existing knowledge,◦ standards, guidelines, rules

Page 4: 13 Towards Mobile Web Accessibility Evaluation

27-28 March 2010, Paphos, Cyprus

FOSS-AMASatellite event

Accessibility◦ … Web sites are accessible when individuals with

disabilities can access and use them as effectively as people who don’t have disabilities (Slatin and Rush)

Standards, Laws, Tools

Mobile additional restrictions Screen size, CPU, Battery,

Memory, Mouse, Keypad, Communications,

Usage situations

Page 5: 13 Towards Mobile Web Accessibility Evaluation

27-28 March 2010, Paphos, Cyprus

FOSS-AMASatellite event

Standards are the best approach to interoperability in this fragmented devices market

MWBP W3C Recommendation 2008◦ BP to improve user experience of Web

when accessed from such devices◦ 60 Best Practices – delivered content◦ WCAG derived - mobile relevance

scope

Page 6: 13 Towards Mobile Web Accessibility Evaluation

27-28 March 2010, Paphos, Cyprus

FOSS-AMASatellite event

Disability Types link ◦ body structure impairments (BSI)

deviation, loss, of body functions (sight, hear, …) map◦ interaction limitations (vision loss creates a blind spot, blur)

associate ◦ guidelines and heuristics to specific BSI determine◦ users groups that benefit from each guideline application

extend ◦ to cope with WCAG & MWBP

Page 7: 13 Towards Mobile Web Accessibility Evaluation

27-28 March 2010, Paphos, Cyprus

FOSS-AMASatellite event

Content Disabilities context Mobile context

Information conveyed solely with color

Visually impaired, Colorblind

Limited color palette Outdoors usage

Missing or inappropriate page title (e.g. long)

Blind, screen reader. list of open windows

Small screen or viewport

Audio-only prompts (beeps)

Deaf or hard of hearing

Noisy usage situations

Content spawning new windows without warning user

Low vision, Restricted field of vision, Blindness, Cognitive disabilities don’t realize new window

Single window interface. Multiple stacked windows on small screen hide each other

http://www.w3.org/WAI/mobile/experiences

Page 8: 13 Towards Mobile Web Accessibility Evaluation

27-28 March 2010, Paphos, Cyprus

FOSS-AMASatellite event

http://www.w3.org/WAI/mobile/experiences

Content WCAG 1.0checkpoint

WCAG 2.0success criteria

MWBest Practice

Information conveyed solely with color

2.1, 2.2 1.4.1 Use of Color1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum)…

USE_OF_COLORCOLOR_CONTRAST

Missing or inappropriate page title

13.2 2.4.2 Page Titled Page Title

Audio-only prompts (beeps)

1.1, 1.4 1.2.1 Audio-only and video-only

NON TEXT ALTERNATIVES

Content spawning new windows without warning user

10.1 3.1.2 On-focus3.2.2 On-Input3.2.5 Chage on Request

POP_UPS

Roger
Content formatted using tables or CSSWCAG 2.0 Meaningful sequenceMWBP Tables_Layout, Tables_Nested, Tables_Alternatives
Page 9: 13 Towards Mobile Web Accessibility Evaluation

27-28 March 2010, Paphos, Cyprus

FOSS-AMASatellite event

• Best Practices (Mobile usage context)• Disability Type Related• General Mobile Usage• Disability type inadequate

• MWBP

Page 10: 13 Towards Mobile Web Accessibility Evaluation

27-28 March 2010, Paphos, Cyprus

FOSS-AMASatellite event

Disability type

Usage Scenario

Selector

Simulation Profile

Guidelines

User Interface Evaluator

HTMLParser

Web Resource

Included Resource

Linked Resource

GuidelineTests

ResultsHandler

HTTPHandler

Pre-Processor

Assessor

Roger
relate to ACCESSIBLE 's Portal ServiceEARL report toolIinference engine
Page 11: 13 Towards Mobile Web Accessibility Evaluation

27-28 March 2010, Paphos, Cyprus

FOSS-AMASatellite event

Page 12: 13 Towards Mobile Web Accessibility Evaluation

27-28 March 2010, Paphos, Cyprus

FOSS-AMASatellite event

Page 13: 13 Towards Mobile Web Accessibility Evaluation

27-28 March 2010, Paphos, Cyprus

FOSS-AMASatellite event

Page 14: 13 Towards Mobile Web Accessibility Evaluation

27-28 March 2010, Paphos, Cyprus

FOSS-AMASatellite event

Extend BP coverage Integrate Portal, Inference Engine, EARL reports,

Feedback

Web designers & developers◦ accessibility & mobile adequacy specificities◦ diverse best practices & tools

Common methods & tools Develop, use, learn and improve Towards Accessible & Mobile Adequate Web

Contents

Page 15: 13 Towards Mobile Web Accessibility Evaluation

27-28 March 2010, Paphos, Cyprus

FOSS-AMASatellite event

Thank you !

[email protected]

http://www.accessible-project.eu

feedback wanted from accessibility experts