1 phd workshop project management 4 november 2010 dr kay dudman faculty of computing london...

96
1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

Upload: ferdinand-bryant

Post on 16-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

1

PhD WorkshopProject Management

4 November 2010

Dr Kay DudmanFaculty of Computing

London Metropolitan University

Page 2: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

2

Plan for today

Projects and project management: some definitions

Project life cycle

Planning tools and techniques

Page 3: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

33

What we are notnot doing todayNot writing proposals...Not writing proposals......looking organising, scheduling and

monitoring activities and resources

What we are are doing todayUsing examplesUsing examples

...try out the techniques in the context of your own PhD

Page 4: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

4

Definitions

Project

Purpose of projects

Project management

Stakeholders

Project life cycle

Page 5: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

5

What is a project?

"...a managed collection of activities to bring about a desired change"

(CCTA, 1997)

"...a temporary endeavour undertaken to create a unique product or service"

(PMBoK, 1996)

Page 6: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

66

Why do we have projects?

"All work is project work"

Tom Peters, 1999

Page 7: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

7

What is project management?

Ensuring the defined project is delivered

on time

within budget

to the specification and quality required and expected by the major stakeholders

Making the project happenhappen

Page 8: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

8

Stakeholder analysis

A stakeholder in a project is a person or organisation who:

is involved with...

is affected by...

can affect the outcome of...

the project

A key stakeholder could close the project

Page 9: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

9

Who are the (key) stakeholders(key) stakeholders for your PhD programmes?

Page 10: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

10

Project life cycle

Four phase life cycle

...there are other models in use

Page 11: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

11

Project life cycle

Four basic phases conceptualisation definition/plan execution/implementation finishing/completion

Page 12: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

12

Conceptualisation initial plans demonstrate feasibility identify general risks and constraints identify stakeholders & their

requirements define scope determine success criteria prepare feasibility document gain approval to move to next stage…

Project life cycle:

Page 13: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

13

Definition/plan refine objectives and scope design solution identify project constraints identify tasks and activities identify resources agree standards and methods

Project life cycle:

Page 14: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

14

Definition/plan (continued) schedule activities and resources agree budget assess risks produce a baseline plan gain approval to move to next stage...

Project life cycle:

Page 15: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

151515

Why plan?

If we failfail to planplan…

…we planplan to fail fail !

Page 16: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

16

Definition/plan proactive rather than reactive who does what, when and how? what resources are required, and

when? identify problems and/or risks early help identify costs help communication allows progress to be measured

Why plan?

Page 17: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

17

Why plan?

Planning has its own costs

Benefits must outweigh costs Good planning will benefitbenefit the project Bad planning can add to the cost of failurefailure

Don't over-plan – allow flexibility too detailed may be impossible to achieve

Page 18: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

18

Execution/implementation detailed technical requirements &

design refine & carry out the plan monitor & control progress against

plan update plan as necessary report on progress plan identifies detail of future work

Project life cycle:

Page 19: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

19

Finishing/completion work is completed and documented finished product made available provides basis for final evaluation

Project life cycle:

Page 20: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

20

What phase of the project life project life cyclecycle is your PhD?

What do you need to do to move to the next phase?

Page 21: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

21

Planning tools and techniques STEEPLE factors SMART objectives Work breakdown structure Scheduling Gantt charts Network diagrams Critical path analysis

Project management

Page 22: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

22

External (environmental) factors include:= S= Socialocial

= P= Politicalolitical

= E= Economicconomic

= T= Technologicalechnological

= E= Environmentalnvironmental

S

T

E

E

P

L

E

Influencing factors

= L= Legalegal

= E= Ethicalthical

Page 23: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

23

What STEEPLE factorsSTEEPLE factors can you identify for your PhD?

Page 24: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

24

Objectives

Clear project objectives are vitalvital to planning

Allow successsuccess of the project to be evaluated

Enable prioritiespriorities to be set

Enable conflictsconflicts to be resolved

Provide direction and motivation

Published so key stakeholders are aware of them

Must be SSMMAARRTT

Cross-reference at end to establish completion

Page 25: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

25

Objectives

= S= Specific and written downpecific and written down

= T= Time-framedime-framed

= A= Agreed, Aligned, Achievablegreed, Aligned, Achievable

= M= Measurableeasurable

= R= Realistic, Relevantealistic, Relevant

S

M

A

R

T

Page 26: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

26

SMART Objectives

Increase UK sales volume of ring binders by 5% by 30 June 2011

Some examples:

the objective is:

specific and written downspecific and written down

measurablemeasurable “increase UK sales volume of ring binders by 5%”

achievableachievable by the staff concerned, agreedagreed by those involved, alignedaligned to the requirements of the organisation

relevantrelevant to organisation’s sales targets, realisticrealistic in terms of outlets

time-framedtime-framed “by 30 June 2011”

Page 27: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

27

SMART Objectives

Reduce staff absenteeism in SE department by 30% by 31 Dec 2011

Some examples:

the objective is:

specific and written downspecific and written down

measurablemeasurable “reduce staff absenteeism in SE dept by 30%”

achievableachievable by the staff concerned, with health awareness courses, agreedagreed by those involved, alignedaligned to the requirements of the organisation

relevantrelevant to the work of the organisation, realisticrealistic in terms of health care provision

time-framedtime-framed “by 31 December 2011”

Page 28: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

2828

SMART Objectives

Submit draft report to supervisor by 31 August 2011

Some examples:

the objective is:

specific and written downspecific and written down

measurablemeasurable “submit draft report”

achievableachievable by the student (you!), agreedagreed between student and supervisor, alignedaligned to the research topic

relevantrelevant to the research area, realisticrealistic in terms resources (e.g. attending seminar / conference / workshop)

time-framedtime-framed “by 31 August 2011”

Page 29: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

29

What SMART objectivesSMART objectives can you identify for your PhD?

Page 30: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

30

Work Breakdown Structure

Systematic way of breaking down a project into manageable and well-defined “chunks” of work (work packageswork packages)

Each work packagework package broken down into a detailed list of activitiesactivities

Each activityactivity broken down into individual taskstasks

Page 31: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

3131

Work Breakdown Structure

project your PhD!

Page 32: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

3232

Work Breakdown Structure

work packages work packages could include:

literature survey and reviewperform studyanalyse & interpret resultswriting thesis

Page 33: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

3333

Work Breakdown Structure

activities activities could include: identify and review relevant papers submit paper to conference submit interim report to supervisor prepare questionnaire interpret data from questionnaire identify subjects (individuals) for study plan structure of thesis

Page 34: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

3434

Work Breakdown Structure

tasks tasks could include: request paper by Jones from library request paper by Smith from author review paper by Jones review paper by Smith interview subjects set questions for questionnaire issue questionnaire analyse data from questionnaire write report have report proof read submit report cite references build references section

Page 35: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

35

Work Breakdown Structure

Project Breakdown: top level

W P 1 W P 2 W P 3 W P 4

C o m ple te P ro je ct

Page 36: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

36

Work Breakdown Structure

W ork Package 1 Breakdown

A c tivity 1 .1 A c tivity 1 .2 A c tivity 1 .3

W P 1

Page 37: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

37

Work Breakdown Structure

Activity 1.1 Breakdown

Task 1.1.1 Task 1.1.2 Task 1.1.3 Task 1.1.4

A c tivity 1 .1

Page 38: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

38

Work Breakdown Structure

Project Breakdown: com plete structure

Task 1.1.1Task 1.1.2Task 1.1.3Task 1.1.4

A c tivity 1 .1

Task 1.2.1Task 1.2.2Task 1.2.3

A c tivity 1 .2

Task 1.3.1Task 1.3.2

A c tivity 1 .3

W P 1 W P 2 W P 3

Task 4.1.1Task 4.1.2Task 4.1.3

A c tivity 4 .1

Task 4.2.1Task 4.2.2Task 4.2.3Task 4.2.4Task 4.2.5

A c tivity 4 .2

W P 4

C o m p le te P ro je ct

Page 39: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

39

Work Breakdown Structure

Work package breakdown decided on: Functional grounds Responsibility Project phase Geographic location

There is not an implied order in the

work packageswork packages / activitiesactivities / taskstasks

Page 40: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

404040

Work Breakdown StructureWork package: literature survey and Work package: literature survey and

reviewreviewActivity Activity – identify relevant literature

tasktask: request paper by Jones from library tasktask: request paper by Smith from author

Activity Activity – review relevant literature tasktask: review paper by Jones tasktask: review paper by Smith

Work package: check validity of dataWork package: check validity of data Activity Activity – confirm findings of survey

tasktask: interview subjects

Activity Activity – interpret data from questionnaire tasktask: analyse data from questionnaire

Page 41: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

41414141

Work Breakdown StructureWork package: prepare surveyWork package: prepare survey

Activity Activity – generate questionnaire for survey tasktask: set questions for questionnaire tasktask: issue questionnaire

Work package: report findingsWork package: report findingsActivity Activity – construct report

tasktask: write report tasktask: have report proof read tasktask: submit report

Activity Activity – gather existing work tasktask: cite references tasktask: build references section

Page 42: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

42

What work packages, activities and work packages, activities and taskstasks can you identify for planning your research?

Can you group the activities and tasks together in different ways?

Which arrangement suits youryour way of working?

Page 43: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

43

Scheduling

Setting out all project activities & tasks

logically so dependencies & resource

constraints are satisfied

The project schedule is constrained by:

Resource availability

Logical dependencies

Milestone constraints

Page 44: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

44

Resources

Resource availability affects task schedule

Ensure the rightright resources are used

Ensure resources are used efficientlyefficiently

Affects cost, quality and time

Relationship between these is not linear(Brooks, 1995)

Page 45: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

45

Resources

HumanOther

Equipment Tools Office space Information Raw materials … and so on ...

Page 46: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

46

What resourcesresources do you need for your research?

Page 47: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

47

Dependencies

Logical relationships between tasks

Finish-to-start is common task Atask A must finish before task Btask B can start

may include lag and lead times (delay or overlap)

Page 48: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

48

Dependencies

Other constraints on tasks: task cannot start beforebefore a specific date task must finish byby a specific date task must start onon a specific date task must start as soonsoon as possible task must start as latelate as possible task must run in parallelin parallel with another task task must wait X dayswait X days after another task ends

• caution: these may be consecutive working days

Page 49: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

49

Milestones

Milestones significant eventssignificant events in the project plan normally correspond to key deliverables

• transfer report from MPhil to PhD

• submission of thesis

milestones and dates are agreed with key stakeholders at the baseline plan stage

milestones often become fixedfixed

Page 50: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

50

What milestonesmilestones can you identify for your PhD?

Page 51: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

5151

Scheduling

TasksTasks must be scheduled to satisfy all constraints, logical dependencies and milestone dates

There are tools to help achieve this Project schedule must also be ‘‘stable stable ’’

Small disruptions Small disruptions to tasks must not have significant impact on the whole schedulewhole schedule

Page 52: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

5252

Gantt charts Gantt charts show tasks/activities against time Tasks could include:

request Jones paper from library request Smith paper from author review paper by Jones review paper by Smith interview subjects set questions for questionnaire issue questionnaire analyse data from questionnaire submit report have report proof read write report cite references build references section

Page 53: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

535353

Gantt charts

Can set questions while requesting and reviewing papers Might not need two full weeks

Page 54: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

545454

Gantt charts

Might be able to start this task early ...and finish early

Page 55: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

555555

Gantt charts

Might not have to start this task straight away Might want to delay while doing other things

Page 56: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

565656

Gantt charts

Might be able to set questions in the middle of the time slot

Page 57: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

575757

Gantt charts

Questionnaire must be prepared before it can be issued

Page 58: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

585858

Gantt charts

Questionnaire must be issued & returned before results can be analysed

Page 59: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

595959

Gantt charts

Analyse data before interviewing subjects

Page 60: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

606060

Gantt charts

Interview subjects before writing report

Page 61: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

616161

Gantt charts

Have report proof read before submission

Page 62: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

62

Gantt charts

In their basic form Gantt charts: Do not explicitly show logical dependencies Do not optimise resources and costs Do not display current progress

But...They are simple to read

Page 63: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

63

Isolate the Baseline Plan

RisksRisks must be associated with a planplan before they can be handled

As risks could prevent the achievement of objectives, plans for achieving objectives must be in place before risks can be considered

Page 64: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

64

Analyse and Assign RisksIdentify:

WhatWhat are the potential risks?

Assess: What is the impactimpact of each risk? What is the likelihoodlikelihood of the risk occurring? How can the risk be preventedprevented or identifiedidentified

early early ? What needs to be doneneeds to be done if the risk does occur?

Allocate: To whom can I assignassign the risk?

this will probably be youyou

Page 65: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

65

What risksrisks can you identify in your plan for your PhD?

What could possibly go wrong?

Page 66: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

66

Network diagrams

Powerful tools to represent and optimise

complex schedules

Not as intuitive as Gantt charts

Planning rather management reporting tool

Page 67: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

67

Activity on Arrow

The network consists of ‘nodes’ and ‘arrows’ Each node represents an ‘event’ Each arrow starts and ends at an event Each arrow represents an activity Arrows and nodes are uniquely labelled Arrows point from left to right (indicating time)

Page 68: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

68

10 20A

2

Activity A runs from event 10 to event 20 and has a duration of 2 time units

An activity could be: identify and review relevant papers submit paper to conference submit interim report to supervisor prepare questionnaire interpret data from questionnaire identify subjects (individuals) for study

Activity on Arrow

Page 69: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

69

Activity on Arrow

10 20 50 70 80

30 40

60

A2

B4

D3

C5

E2 F

3G3H7

I3

Page 70: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

70

Critical path method

Earliest Event Time (EET): Earliest time an event can occur

Equal to the earliest time allall activities leading into the event can be completed

Determines the earliest time any activity leading from the event can start

Page 71: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

71

Critical path method

Latest Event Time (LET):

Latest time an event can occur (and still complete the project in the shortest possible time)

Greater than or equal to the earliest event time

Cannot be earlier than the earliest event time (would indicate a problem in the calculation)

Page 72: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

72

Critical path method

Notes: two passes through network diagram

• first pass to calculate EETs, left to right

• second pass to calculate LETs, right to left

Page 73: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

73

Critical path method

Notes: cannot have LET earlierearlier than EET - by

definition cannot have negativenegative times for EETs and

LETs start time of project will be zero (EET=LET=0) finish time of project will have EET=LET

Page 74: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

7474

Critical path method

Some definitions …

FloatFloat is the difference between LET and EET: Float = LET – EET

Slack is slightly different from float, but the terms are often used inthe same way

Float is always greater than or equal to zero

Page 75: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

7575

Critical path method

Some definitions …

The critical pathcritical path is the sequence of activities with zero float

The critical pathcritical path is:

the longest pathlongest path through the network, but the shortest timeshortest time in which the project can be completed

The critical path must go all the way throughall the way through the network diagram

Page 76: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

76

Critical path method

10 00

2022

5070 80

30 40

60

A2

B4

D3

C5

E2 F

3G3H7

I3

EETEET

EET 0 plus duration 2 gives EET 2 for the

next activities B, C & D

Page 77: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

77

Critical path method

10 00

2022

5077

70 80

30 66

40

6055

A2

B4

D3

C5

E2 F

3G3H7

I3

EETEET

EET 2 plus duration 3 gives EET 5 for the

next activity H

EET 2 plus duration 5 gives EET 7 for the

next activity G

EET 2 plus duration 4 gives EET 6 for the

next activity E

Page 78: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

78

Critical path method

10 00

2022

5077

701212

80

30 66

4088

6055

A2

B4

D3

C5

E2 F

3G3H7

I3

EETEET

From H, EET 5 plus duration 7 gives EET 12 for the next activity I

From G, EET 7 plus duration 3 gives EET 10

for the next activity I

From F, EET 8 plus duration 3 gives EET 11

for the next activity I

Page 79: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

79

Critical path method

10 00

2022

5077

701212

801515

30 66

4088

6055

A2

B4

D3

C5

E2 F

3G3H7

I3

EETEETChoose the latestlatest EET;

need to wait until longest activity has finished

EET 12 plus duration 3 gives 15 for the endof the project

Page 80: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

80

Critical path method: table

Activity Duration EET LET Float/Slack

A 2 0B 4 2C 5 2D 3 2E 2 6F 3 8G 3 7H 7 5I 3 12

Page 81: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

81

Critical path method

1000

2022

5077

701212,,1212

801515,,1515

3066

4088

6055

A2

B4

D3

C5

E2 F

3G3H7

I3

EETEETLETLET

LET 15 minus duration 3 gives LET 12 for activity I

LET = EET for the end of the project

Page 82: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

82

Critical path method

1000

2022

5077,,99

701212,,1212

801515,,1515

3066

4088,,99

6055,,55

A2

B4

D3

C5

E2 F

3G3H7

I3

EETEETLETLET

LET 12 minus duration 3 gives LET 9 for activity F

LET 1 minus duration 3 gives LET 9 for activity G

LET 12 minus duration 7 gives LET 5 for activity H

Page 83: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

83

Critical path method

1000

2022,,22

5077,,99

701212,,1212

801515,,1515

3066,,77

4088,,99

6055,,55

A2

B4

D3

C5

E2 F

3G3H7

I3

EETEETLETLET

LET 7 minus duration 4 gives LET 3 for activity B

LET 9 minus duration 5 gives LET 4 for activity C

LET 5 minus duration 3 gives LET 2 for activity D

Page 84: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

84

Critical path method

1000

2022,,22

5077,,99

701212,,1212

801515,,1515

3066,,77

4088,,99

6055,,55

A2

B4

D3

C5

E2 F

3G3H7

I3

EETEETLETLET

Choose the earliestearliest LETso that the longest activity will

have enough time to finish

Page 85: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

85

Critical path method

1000,,00

2022,,22

5077,,99

701212,,1212

801515,,1515

3066,,77

4088,,99

6055,,55

A2

B4

D3

C5

E2 F

3G3H7

I3

EETEETLETLET

LET 2 minus duration 2 gives LET 0 for the start of the project

Page 86: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

86

Critical path method: table

Activity Duration EET LET Float/Slack

A 2 0 0B 4 2 2 or 3C 5 2 2 or 4D 3 2 2E 2 6 7F 3 8 9G 3 7 9H 7 5 5I 3 12 12

Page 87: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

87

Critical path method

1000,00

2022,22

5077,99

701212,,1212

801515,1515

3066,77

4088,99

6055,55

A2

B4

D3

C5

E2 F

3G3H7

I3

EETEETLETLETCritical pathCritical path

The longestlongest path through the network is

the shortestshortest timetime the project can take

The critical path is the path with zero float; anyany delay will meanthe whole projectwhole project will be late

Page 88: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

88

Critical path method: table

Activity Duration EET LET Float/Slack

A 2 0 0 00B 4 2 2 or 3 1C 5 2 2 or 4 2D 3 2 2 00E 2 6 7 1F 3 8 9 1G 3 7 9 2H 7 5 5 00I 3 12 12 00

Page 89: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

898989

Network diagram Network diagrams show tasks in sequence/parallel Tasks could include:

request paper by Jones request paper by Smith review paper by Jones review paper by Smith interview subjects set questions for questionnaire issue questionnaire analyse data from questionnaire submit report have report proof read write report cite references build references section

Consider how long each task might take

Page 90: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

9090

Network diagram

10

20

110 12040

30

request Jones paper

request Smith paper

write

repor

tpr

oof

read

repo

rt

subm

i

t re

por

t7060

review Jones paper

review Smith paper

set q

’s for

q’naire

issue

q’na

ire

analyse data

from

q’naire

interview

subjects

50 100

90cit

e

refere

nce

s

build

refe

renc

e

s sec

tion

80

dumm

y

Page 91: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

91

How could you use the critical critical path method path method in planning your PhD?

Page 92: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

92

Conclusion

Project life cycle basic framework for any project

• going on holiday• organising a conference• researching for a PhD

Planning tools & techniques useful methods to help you plan

• what you are going to do• what you have done so far• what there is left to do

Page 93: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

93

Enjoy your research!• think about publishing papers

- relevant journals- appropriate conferences

• attend relevant conferences to get feedback- some conference organisers want student

helpers

• submit your transfer document / thesis- follow the university guidelines

• think about using project management tools and techniques to keep your research on track!

Page 94: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

9494

References & further reading Allen D (2001) Getting Things Done: How to Achieve Stress-free Productivity, Piatkus

Bell J (1993) Doing Your Research Project: A Guide for First-Time Researchers in Education and Social Science, 2nd edition, Open University Press

Cohen L, Manion L & Morrison K (2000) Research Methods in Education, 5th edition, Routledge Falmer

Page 95: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

959595

References & further reading Andersen E S (2008) Rethinking Project Management: An Organisational Perspective, FT Prentice-Hall

Bentley C (1997) PRINCE 2: A Practical Handbook, Butterworth-Heinemann

Brooks F. (1995) The Mythical Man-Month (Anniversary Edition), Addison-Wesley

Burke R (1999). Project Management: Planning and Control Techniques, Wiley

Cadle J & Yates D (2008) Project Management for Information Systems, Pearson/Prentice-Hall

Central Computer & Telecommunications Agency (1997) PRINCE 2: An Outline, The Stationery Office

Field M & Keller L (1998) Project Management, International Thomson Business Press

Maylor H (2003) Project Management 3rd edition, FT Prentice-Hall http://www.epigeum.com/component/content/article/37-research-

skills-online/67-6-project-management-in-the-research-context (last accessed 1 Nov 2010)

Page 96: 1 PhD Workshop Project Management 4 November 2010 Dr Kay Dudman Faculty of Computing London Metropolitan University

96

Any Questions?