1 commissioning meeting, cascina, 5.12.2005 la electronics noise budget ● sources of electronic...

26
1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005 LA electronics noise budget Sources of electronic noise C7 electronic noise Electronic noise for optimized power Some conclusions

Upload: walter-bennett

Post on 21-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005 LA electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for optimized

1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005

LA electronics noise budget

● Sources of electronic noise● C7 electronic noise

● Electronic noise for optimized power● Some conclusions

Page 2: 1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005 LA electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for optimized

2 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005

Scheme of LA electronics

ADC noisePreamp. noise

Shot noise

Low-pass filter

AC: Gain 200

DC: Gain 1

diff. sig.

non-diff.sig.

Non-optimal treatment of DC signalsdominated by ADC noise(but were not foreseen as error signals)

VMEQD box

Page 3: 1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005 LA electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for optimized

3 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005

Principles of calculation

Calculate electronic noise at each quadrant diodeAC and DC signals

Reconstruct error signalsUsing C7 matrix

Pass through DSP correction filters

Obtain mirror motions through suspension transfer functionsLA loops closed

Suppose asymmetry (10, 1, 0.2 mm) => length noise

Two cases1. C7

using measured QD DC powers

2. Optimized DC powers50% of saturation power

Page 4: 1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005 LA electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for optimized

4 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005

C7 matrix

ThetaX PR BS NI NE WI WEB2_q1_DC 2.5 -4.5 -6.4 15B5_q1_DC 10B2_q1_ACp -24 9.41 17.9 5.38B1p_q1_ACp 0.052 -0.108 0.0375 1 0.0729B7_q1_ACq 0.042 -0.035 0.375 -0.027B7_q2_ACq 0.042 -0.035 0.375 -0.027B8_q1_ACp -0.25 0.65 0.052 0.071B8_q1_ACq -0.25 -0.65 -0.052 -0.071

ThetaY PR BS NI NE WI WEB2_q1_DC 1B5_q1_DC 10B1p_q1_ACq 1B7_q1_ACp 0.33 0.36B7_q2_ACp 0.68 0.36B7_q2_ACq -0.36 -0.36B8_q1_ACp -0.46 -1 -0.36B8_q2_ACp 1

ThetaX has undergone second diagonalization => mixing of all signals

Page 5: 1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005 LA electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for optimized

5 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005

Electronics noise vs. C7 noise (WE tx)

Page 6: 1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005 LA electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for optimized

6 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005

Electronics noise vs. C7 noise (WE ty)

Pure DC signal

Page 7: 1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005 LA electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for optimized

7 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005

Electronics noise vs. C7 noise (NE tx)

?

Page 8: 1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005 LA electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for optimized

8 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005

Electronics noise vs. C7 noise (NE ty)

Page 9: 1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005 LA electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for optimized

9 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005

Electronics noise vs. C7 noise (NI tx)

Page 10: 1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005 LA electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for optimized

10 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005

Electronics noise vs. C7 noise (NI ty)

Page 11: 1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005 LA electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for optimized

11 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005

Electronics noise vs. C7 noise (BS tx)

Page 12: 1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005 LA electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for optimized

12 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005

Electronics noise vs. C7 noise (BS ty)

Page 13: 1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005 LA electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for optimized

13 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005

Electronics noise vs. C7 noise (PR tx)

Page 14: 1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005 LA electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for optimized

14 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005

Electronics noise vs. C7 noise (PR ty)

Page 15: 1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005 LA electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for optimized

15 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005

Total LA electronics noise (C7, calculated)

WE ty pure DC error signal => no extra noise vs. AC

WI under local controlSimulated WI LA curves for comparison

C7 noise not limited byLA electronics noise

(but: excess noise)

Page 16: 1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005 LA electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for optimized

16 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005

Influence of QD power

Can gain ~ factor 10by increasing QD powers

Page 17: 1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005 LA electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for optimized

17 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005

Noise budget (C7)

ADC noise (= DC noise)is not dominating, butclose => second diagonalization (tx) has spoiled signals by reintroducing DC signals everywhere ?

Page 18: 1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005 LA electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for optimized

18 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005

Influence of mirror centering (optimized powers)

Without optimized matrixnor optimized filters: => need LIGO centering precision (0.2 mm)

Page 19: 1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005 LA electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for optimized

19 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005

Noise budget (optimized, 0.2 mm)

Still some effort neededat low frequencies

Page 20: 1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005 LA electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for optimized

20 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005

Contribution of mirrors (optim. powers)

NI ty filter difficult to improve? => try combination of EM + HH optimizations

Page 21: 1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005 LA electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for optimized

21 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005

Conclusions I

We can go quite far => LF design sensitivityusing present matrix and filters

but improvements hopefully possible

using DC signalsif optimizing QD powerif centering mirrors very well

Maximization of power on QD's is important

DC signals don't have more electronic noise than AC signalsTypical levels: AC 50 µV/rtHz DC 3 µV/rtHzLower DC electronic gain is not compensated by higher matrix gain

B2 DC signal seems to have high sensitivity (good SNR)

"second diagonalization" seems to spoil some signalsbut still same order of magnitude than AC signals

Other reasons for getting rid of DC signalsGet rid of laser technical noise at 6 MHz ?Seismic noise ?

Page 22: 1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005 LA electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for optimized

22 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005

Conclusions II

Extra noise observed on NI, BS, PR mirrorsNot limited by electronic noise at 50 HzC7 observation:

NI ty injected noise into dark fringe=> filter roll-off had to be improved

Origin of extra noise- Related to WI local control?- Diffused light?

same noise seen on B7, and on reconstr. signals using B7/B8

- QD miscentering?same noise seen in longitudinal noise (GV)

Page 23: 1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005 LA electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for optimized

23 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005

Conclusions III

ProblemsFeedback gains not well known

Optical matrix not calibrated

PR, BS influence on length noise not yet included

To be doneDevelop optimized correctors

for the 10-20 Hz range

Find optimized matrixUnderstand DC-AC noise questionInclude PR, BS contributions to length noise

Page 24: 1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005 LA electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for optimized

24 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005

End

Page 25: 1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005 LA electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for optimized

25 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005

Electronics noise vs. C7 noise (WI tx)

Local control

Page 26: 1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005 LA electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for optimized

26 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, 5.12.2005

Electronics noise vs. C7 noise (WI ty)

Local control