01.10.2015Weekly Meeting

HE,HB and HF RadDam Analysis with 2015 pp Data

Semiray Girgis, Hasan Huseyin Isik ,Ilknur Baldan, Yalcin Guler,

Shuichi Kunori, Eda Eskut, Isa Dumanoglu

1

2

- 2015 Raddiation Damage Study

HE Raddam Results HB Raddam Results HF Raddam Results

- Conclusions

Content

3

• CMSSW_7_4_8_patch1 is used.• HLT_Mu20_v*• Energy Cuts: 2 • Time < 15 ns.

Run InformationRun Number

Date Time magnetic Field

İnjection scheme

251562252116254790256171

2015.07.12 2015.07.20 2015.08.21 2015.09.08

4h. 40 min. 1h.5h. 8min.5h. 17 min.

3.8T 0T 3.8T 0T

50ns_296b_254_36_246_36bpi11inj50ns_482b_420_32_397_72bpi11inj25ns_315b_303_270_276_72bpi9inj25ns_459b_447_351_372_72bpi11inj

NOTE : Above information is for HE and HB Raddam analysis

4

Energy cut 2 GeV Comparison results for HE

5

HE_50ns vs 25ns Minus (0T)

Ratio= 256171(25ns)/252116(50ns)

50 ns25 ns

6

HE_50ns vs 25ns Plus(0T)

Ratio= 256171(25ns)/252116(50ns)

7

HE_50ns vs 25ns Minus(3.8T)

Ratio= 254790(25ns)/251562(50ns)

8

HE_50ns vs 25ns Plus (3.8T)

Ratio= 254790(25ns)/251251(50ns)

9

Muon_Pt

r256171B=0T25ns

r254790B=3.8T25ns

r252116B=0T50ns

r251562B=3.8T50ns

10

Energy cut 2 GeV Comparison results for HB

11

HB_50ns vs 25ns Minus (0T)

12

HB_50ns vs 25ns Plus(0T)

13

HB_50ns vs 25ns Minus(3.8T)

14

HB_50ns vs 25ns Plus (3.8T)

15

HF comparison results

16

Run InformationRun Number

magnetic Field

İnjection scheme Data Sets

251721254879256866

3.8T 3.8T 3.8T

50ns_476b_414_32_397_72bpi10inj25ns_458b_446_360_372_48bpi13inj25ns_1177b_1165_1080_1110_144bpi11inj

/ExpressPhysics/Run2015B-Express-v1/FEVT/ExpressPhysics/Run2015C-Express-v1/FEVT/ExpressPhysics/Run2015D-Express-v1/FEVT

• CMSSW_7_4_8_patch1 is used.• Energy Cuts: 2 GeV • -10 < Time < +15 ns.• We did not use any trigger for HF

17

HF_Depth1_Minus (3.8T)

18

HF_Depth2_Minus (3.8T)

19

HF_Depth1_Plus (3.8T)

20

HF_Depth2_Plus (3.8T)

21

Conclusion

• This week we analysed some 2015 runs which are taken at 3.8 T and 0 T for 25ns and 50 ns using HLT_Mu20_v* trigger , and we tried to understand the differences between runs.

• When we plotted the histograms we added ratio plots using 2GeV energy cut.

• Shuichi requested to extend raddam analysis including HF subdetector. After now we will continue to do this analysis for HF too.

• This week we focused on the specific runs. Next week we are planning to focus on 2015 A-B-C-D full data samples.

• When we have enough statistics we can give more information and we can show latest results about this analysis.

THANKS!