| march 23, 2016 complex global supply chains simplified · 2016-03-24 · ultriva’s...
TRANSCRIPT
Quality Digest | March 23, 2016
Complex Global Supply Chains Simplified The value of electronic kanban systems and rapid deployment by Thomas R. Cutler
It’s no surprise that multinational companies have complex global supply chains. What’s less
obvious is how to simplify supply-chain processes and arrive at a lean, consistent, reliable, and
cost-effective solution. One global leader, ITT Corp., has taken on this challenge with the help of
Ultriva, a supply-chain solution by Upland Software, which supplies cloud-based manufacturing
and supply-chain collaboration and execution solutions.
ITT creates highly engineered, customized solutions for the energy, transportation, and
industrial markets, including Goulds and Bornemann pumps, KONI shock absorbers, Cannon
connectors, and Enidine energy-absorption devices. Recently, ITT initiated a lean application
based on the concept of kanban loops that govern material flow and replenishment processes
across their extended enterprise value chains. Kanban loops are a mechanism that signal the
need for inventory replenishment, an important tool in ensuring that production lines are
optimally stocked with necessary parts and components. Kanban signals trigger material
coordinators to deliver items in the right quantity when and where required. As product is
consumed in the production process, an order for depleted inventory is placed immediately,
either via a physical kanban card or electronically through a computerized electronic kanban
system.
Physical kanban card systems tend to work well inside the four walls of high-volume, low-mix
production environments where stable customer demand, repetitive manufacturing, and line-
of-sight exists. However, these systems tend to break down in high-volume, high-mix as well as
low-volume, high-mix environments where variable customer demand, frequent changeovers,
and limited line of sight are common. In those situations, an electronic kanban system makes
more sense, says Frank Kapper, general manager of Ultriva.
“Ultriva’s electronic kanban solution, also known as e-kanban, ensures that global
manufacturers’ entire supply chain is constructed as a series of interconnected e-kanban loops,
both internal and external,” explains Kapper. “Each loop is optimally sized based on customer
demand, and material replenishment is driven by real-time consumption scans.”
Examples of interconnected internal e-kanban loops include those between assembly and
subassembly lines, those between production lines and supermarkets, and those between
supermarkets and raw material warehouses. Examples of interconnected external e-kanban
loops include those between a plant and distribution centers, and those between raw material
warehouses and external suppliers.
“Many manufacturing firms today still rely on open-loop manufacturing and supply-chain
management (SCM) processes, where visibility into order status is limited to ERP systems that
push orders to the plant floor, or generalized supplier portals that push orders to suppliers,”
says Kapper. “Once released, order management takes on a life of its own, status is managed by
custom-built spreadsheets, frequent visits to the shop floor, email exchanges, fax messages,
and follow-up phone calls. E-kanban works best when the supporting manufacturing and SCM
processes are closed-loop in design.”
Ultriva closes the loop on manufacturing and supply chain processes by tightly integrating with
ERP systems and by leveraging its internal workflow, business rules, and alerting engine.
Routine, day-to-day manufacturing and SCM processes are supported by predefined workflows
with associated business rules and automated alerting. Whenever Ultriva detects a deviation
from an established workflow, alerts are automatically generated and routed to designated
individuals via the browser or to their personal communication devices, delivering actionable
business intelligence on potential or actual issues.
“The end product of an Ultriva deployment is a multienterprise-equipped supply chain that
contains as many e-kanban loops or tiers as necessary, with each node in the supply chain
synchronized based on real-time consumption scans,” says Kapper. “The end results of an
Ultriva deployment are right-sized inventory levels, increased on-time delivery performance,
improved visibility to customer demand, reduced stock-outs, and actionable business
intelligence on manufacturing and supply-chain performance.”
Before and after scenarios
As with most effective lean manufacturing and supply-chain initiatives, there were strong and
engaged leaders who championed the work to ensure a rapid implementation schedule. Kapper
shared how the ITT implementation started at one location in 2015 and quickly led to six plants
across the globe, each with a different ERP system. ITT had an existing supplier portal, which
was more of a website that pushed information to suppliers. ITT had planned for an
enterprisewide deployment of system applications products (SAP). As part of that initiative, the
company intended to replace its existing supplier portal with a collaborative one that included
supply-chain execution tools. One of the company’s key considerations in selecting a supplier
portal was that it had to be ERP-agnostic and could be deployed to both SAP and non-SAP
plants.
When ITT’s SAP implementation was delayed, the Ultriva implementation team had to revise its
deployment plans to include integrating its e-kanban solution with legacy versions of QAD and
LS400/AS400 systems at European plants, an older version of SAP (4.0) at the Santa Ana,
California, and Nogales, Mexico, plants, and SAP ECC 6.0 at the Santa Rosa, California, plant.
The ITT China plant went live with Ultriva’s lean e-kanban solution in May 2015. A month later
e-kanban went live at the ITT plant in Italy. In July 2015 the solutions was live at the ITT plant in
Germany, followed by the plants in Santa Ana and Nogales in August 2015. Finally, the ITT plant
in Santa Rosa went live in September 2015.
Scott Stickles, senior software consultant at Ultriva, supervised these implementations and
noted that ITT looked at the new version of its existing portal and SAP’s supplier portal, and
confirmed that neither solution could match the features, intuitive user interface, and flexibility
of Ultriva. Speedy deployment and comprehensive. out-of-the-box feature sets were the
determining factors.
ITT is also planning to deploy Ultriva’s request for quote (RFQ) and quality management system
(QMS) systems in later phases of the rollout.
Before the e-kanban
supply-chain portal
After the e-kanban
supply-chain portal
Kanban Very little kanban was used. Most
parts were on MRP-driven
replenishment or supplier-driven
MIN-MAX replenishment.
Ultriva’s collaborative supply portal
(CSP) solution added MRP forecast,
discrete purchasing,
andkanban replenishment to ITT’s
material replenishment methods. ITT
gained better visibility, and suppliers
were able to print labels and implement
scanning at the receiving dock. ITT also
uses an inventory optimization tool
(IOT) to identify which parts are best
suited for kanbanand to optimally
size kanbanloops.
Vendor-managed
inventory (VMI)
Suppliers were carrying inventory on
behalf of ITT at their locations based
on forecasts. They were shipping
according to the on-hand and in-
VMI suppliers now get planned-demand
data through the portal and are able to
provide VMI inventory levels back to
ITT. This visibility provides ITT
transit data provided in the forecast
file.
planners and suppliers with the
actionable business intelligence they
need to better plan for, coordinate, and
execute day-to-day material and
production operations.
Call-off ITT was releasing material-
replenishment orders to suppliers
based on the planned demand
provided in the forecast files. As
demand changed, suppliers were
forced to adjust production and
shipping schedules, which often
resulted in their having excess or
insufficient inventory on hand.
ITT now uses a “call-off” feature that
waits for firm orders before releasing
material-replenishment orders to
suppliers. This feature helped eliminate
the bullwhip effect at suppliers,
resulting in improved order fill rates
and more stable inventory levels.
Discrete orders Some ITT plants were using a website
to upload discrete orders. Suppliers
would log-in to the website to
download purchase orders, which
then had to be tracked in
spreadsheets due to frequent changes.
ITT buyers lacked real-time visibility
into the status of these orders,
resulting in frequent emails and
phone calls with suppliers. The end
result was a significant amount of
nonvalue-added time for both the
buyer and supplier.
All six ITT plants now use the supplier
portal to receive standardized material-
replenishment alerts; PDF copies of
purchase orders are attached,
regardless of order type. Orders are
tracked as closed-loop processes from
the time the order is released through
its arrival at a plant. Order recalls and
reschedules are managed as closed-loop
workflows, allowing for improved
collaboration and execution between
buyers and suppliers whenever
production schedules change.
Consignment Some ITT plants were using
consignment, which allowed suppliers
to keep inventory at these plants. It
was the supplier’s responsibility to
perform daily visual checks to
The demand-driven solution allows ITT
to tag a part as a consignment. These
parts are treated differently: Inventory
data aren’t updated via ERP until a part
is issued or used in production. It also
compared active and planned orders;
on-hand consigned inventory ensured
they could meet customer demand.
provides information to suppliers about
inventory and quantities consumed at
ITT in real time. Suppliers located
around the globe can now manage
consigned inventory for ITT and quickly
generate invoices for the material
consumed.
Addressing volatile demand and fluctuating inventory
Manufacturers are being squeezed by two complex market trends: Customer demand is
increasingly volatile, and suppliers are less willing to carry extra inventory to serve customers’
fluctuating needs. To successfully address this dilemma, manufacturers must shift from using
forecast-based planning systems to consumption-based replenishment systems.
In most manufacturing companies, the supply chain is still controlled by MRP and ERP systems
that use forecasted or planned demand to establish material requirements. Every MRP run
generates changes in material requirements that led to whiplashes across the supply chain. The
costly and serious ripple effects of these ever-changing requirements include stock-outs,
shortages, bloated inventory levels, costly expediting, and missed or late customer shipments.
Addressing the challenge of inaccurate planning is a top quality-control issue among global
corporations. Driven by lean initiative teams, the interest in collaborative supply portals (CSP) is
rapidly expanding. Using a simple platform for accessing standardized material demands,
acknowledging receipt of orders, and viewing shipment information offers real-time visibility
and collaboration between supply partners. Planners, buyers, and suppliers see a single version
of truth and can respond effectively and immediately to unexpected changes in demand. A
demand-driven solution also ensures that product quality need not be compromised.