zom mrp 006(management of risks)

8/8/2019 ZOM MRP 006(Management of Risks)

1/24

Engineering & Construction Division

Doc# : MOF-QHSE-ZOSCO-PR-01

Title Standard Operating Procedure : Management of |Risk

General Procedure

Management Of Risks


2/24





3/24




TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. SCOPE AND PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................4

2. REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................................4

3. DEFINITIONS .........................................................................................................................................4

4. RESPONSIBILITIES ..............................................................................................................................4

5. PROCEDURES ......................................................................................................................................7

5.1 GENERAL ...........................................................................................................................................7

5.2 Identification Of Potential Risks .....................................................................................................8

5.2 IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL RISKS .........................................................................................8

5.3 Risk Assessments .......................................................................................................................10

5.3 RISK ASSESSMENTS ......................................................................................................................10

Stages of the risk assessment.................................................................................................. 10

STAGES OF THE RISK ASSESSMENT .................................................................................................10

5.4 Risk Assessment Criteria ............................................................................................................12

5.4 RISK ASSESSMENT CRITERIA .......................................................................................................12

5.5 Detailed Risk Assessment Procedure .........................................................................................12

5.5 DETAILED RISK ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ..............................................................................12

Step 1: Task Identification ........................................................................................................12

STEP 1: TASK IDENTIFICATION ...........................................................................................................12

Step 2: Hazard Identification .....................................................................................................13

STEP 2: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION .....................................................................................................13

Step 3: Who/What might be harmed .........................................................................................14

STEP 3: WHO/WHAT MIGHT BE HARMED ...........................................................................................14

Step 4: Quantify the risk ...........................................................................................................15

STEP 4: QUANTIFY THE RISK ..............................................................................................................15

Step 5: Control Measures .........................................................................................................16

STEP 5: CONTROL MEASURES ...........................................................................................................16

Step 6: Residual Risk ...............................................................................................................17

STEP 6: RESIDUAL RISK ......................................................................................................................17


4/24




1. Scope and Purpose

The scope of this procedure applies to Health, Safety and Environmental risksassociated with projects undertaken by ZOSCO under the scope of the ProjectManagement.

The purpose of this procedure is to describe the methodology to be adopted inperforming the process of risk management within projects.

2. References

Company Health, Safety and Environmental Manual;

OHSAS 18001:1999 Occupational Health and Safety Assessment Series;

International Safety Management (ISM) Code;

3. Definitions

ZOSCO: Zamil Offshore Services Company

Hazard: A source or a situation with a potential for harm in terms of injury or illhealth, damage to property, damage to the workplace environment, or acombination of these (OHSAS 18001:1999).

Risk: Combination of the likelihood and consequence(s) of a specified hazardousevent occurring (OHSAS 18001:1999).

Risk Assessment: Overall process of estimating the magnitude of risk and decidingwhether or not the risk is tolerable (OHSAS 18001:1999).

Tolerable Risk: Risk that has been reduced to a level that can be endured by theorganisation having regard to its legal obligations and its own OH & S Policy(OHSAS 18001:1999).

Risk Owner: Person directly accountable for (the completion of) a process oractivity.

The Risk Owner for Subcontractor is the Subcontractor Project Manager.

4. Responsibilities

Project Manager who are in charge for a particular project phase, operation, task orequipment, are responsible for ensuring that adequate risk assessment have beenconducted within the area of their competence.

In addition to that:

The Senior Management is responsible for review and agreement of measures to betaken in reducing and mitigating risks within their area of competence. This includes,but not limited to:

Approval of plans and authorization /allocation of the necessary resources forrisk reduction;


5/24




Identification of top-level risks which may not have been identified by the project

team.The Chief Project Manager / Project Manager / QHSE Manager is responsible forthe overall implementation of this procedure.

The Project Manager, as delegated by the Chief Project Manager shall beresponsible for the risk management process for each project within his authority.The Project Manager may delegate other project team members as risk ownerswho will be responsible for evaluating the risks.

The Project Manager shall identify risks throughout the project and particularly at thebeginning where they should be included in the target budget document.

The Project Manager shall have overall responsibility for: Communicating information in order to provide a joint effort to identify and

mitigate risks;

Ensuring that effective procedures are implemented to manage risks which mayaffect the project;

Identification of hazards;

Evaluation of identified risks;

Reporting significant risks to the Chief Project and QHSE Manager

Audit (or arrangement of audit) of the project risk management process;

Leading Hazid / Risk Assessment sessions;

Preparation and maintenance of reports and logs;

Accounting for the use of the risk management budget;

Ensuring that approved risk reduction actions are integrated into the main projectschedule and budget;

Monitoring progress on risks and risk reduction actions.

Project team members shall be responsible for:

Identification of risks and advising the Project Manager;

Cooperation in the provision of all data necessary for the effective identificationand assessment of risk;

Proposing risk reduction actions and submitting them to the Project Manager forapproval;

Ensuring that any subcontractors co-operate in the provision of risk data asrequired;

Implement risk reduction measures;


6/24




Regularly review and update risks and monitor risk reduction in collaboration

with the Project Manager.The Line Management shall:

Ensure that the vessel/site risks are identified and control measures are in place;

Lead the team involved in the vessel/site risk assessment;

Be responsible for the direct implementation, on the unit under theirmanagement, of the requirements/actions deriving from the risk assessment;

Ensure that all risk assessments are adequately documented, filed, reviewedand followed-up as well as that the relevant information/lessons learnt arepassed to the employees. The latter activity is essential for accident prevention.

The HSE personnel shall liaise and provide technical advice and guidance tomanagement involved in the risk assessment and shall monitor effectiveness.

All Personnel shall be responsible for acquainting themselves with therequirements / findings of any risk assessments which have been carried out onactivities they may be involved in.

Subcontractors shall be advised of any risk management requirements which will beincluded in subcontracts and in general shall:

Report any significant risks to the Project Manager and provide the necessaryinformation required for risk assessment and control;

Ensure that any applicable Risk Management Plan is implemented within theirscope of work;

Ensure that own subcontractors report and provide all the information necessaryfor the identification and evaluation of risk.

The Project HSE Department will be responsible for:

Identifying and reporting any potential risks;

Advising on HSE aspects relating to the management of risk;

Providing further support/advice during the development of risk assessment andauditing for compliance;

Monitoring the compliance of the activities as specified within this procedure andreporting to the Project Manager.

The HSE Manager shall be responsible for:

Advising on HSE aspects relating to the whole management of risks processwithin ZOSCO activities.

Providing further support/advice during the development of risk assessmentstudies

Carrying out audits of the Company Risk Management System to ensurecompliance


7/24




Monitoring the compliance of the activities as specified within this procedure and

reporting to the Companys Senior Management accordingly.Risk Authorisers and Authorisation of Risks

According to the assessed risk level and consequence category, acceptance of therisk and its mitigation measures will be authorised by the Project Manager and or adesignated member of ZOSCO Management.

Risk Category

a) Low: Authorisation of Low Level Risks shall be given by the ProjectTeam Member who is responsible for the area in which the risk has been

identified. Project Manager /QHSE Manager shall be informedaccordingly.

b) Medium: Authorisation of Medium Level Risks shall be given by theProject Manager. The Chief Project Manager and QHSE Manager shall beinformed accordingly by the Project Manager.

c) High: High risks should not be accepted and further control measuresshall be taken until the risk is reduced to a level which is considered AsLow As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP).

The full information of the risk shall be presented to the Project Manager /QHSE

Manager by the Project Manager. The Companys President shall be informedaccordingly.

5. Procedures

5.1 General

ZOSCO has the duty to conduct suitable and sufficient risk assessments forthe key operations involving the business units and assess on a W.U.R./S.O.WPackage basis any specific risks additional to those associated with thebusiness unit.

The above is based on the assumption that employers have a legal obligationto assess the risks from their work activities / sites and implement the relevantrisk control measures.

Consistent to the above, all activities must be covered by risk assessmentincluding routine works which will be covered by Job Safety Analysis (JSA).

Generally, specific risk assessment shall be undertaken prior to:

Performing any non-routine activity

Performing a new task

When new people are involved

When third party people are involved


8/24




When major changes to the work/system are considered

Risk Assessments (RA) shall be carried out at the earliest practical opportunityto identify, evaluate and subsequently eliminate, reduce or control thesignificant risks that could lead to loss of life, equipment or endangering of theenvironment.

In all cases RA should be conducted suitably in advance of the intended workto allow the control measures to be correctly implemented.

RAs shall be performed in a systematic manner to identify hazards from allstages and all phases of work as defined in the scope. Hazards identified atthis stage may substantially reduce future liabilities.

The outline stages for performing these assessments, as detailed herein, are: The identification of all hazards;

An evaluation of the associated risks;

Determination and selection of risk reduction/control measures;

Implementation of the control measures;

Continuous monitoring of effectiveness.

The management of risk shall be conducted in accordance with the followingprocess map:

5.2 Identification Of Potential Risks

At the beginning and throughout the project, the Project Manager shall prepareand update an exhaustive list of events that may have a detrimental effect onthe project. This shall be carried out without rating their probability or impact oftheir consequences. The purpose of this stage is to identify and where

possible, limit the effect of any potential risks that may affect the running of theproject. The list will be prepared from the following information:

YES

Identificationof potential

risks

Riskevaluation

Handlingthe risk

Riskreduction&mitigation

Risk Riskreporting

Riskmonitoring

NO

No actionrequired

Risk Analysis/Assessment

Report


Action Record

R A ActionRecord/

Status Logs

Results / feedbackfrom other Risk &

Project FinalReports

Input for futurerisk management

& continualimprovement


Action Record


9/24




Review of project documents, plans and budgets;

Review of previous projects reports, internal reviews, risk reports etc.;

Past experience, (personal, team or through brainstorming;

External sources, (expert advice);

Identification of key events and decisions where risk may be introduced oreliminated.

A Project specific Risk Management Plan may be prepared and issued asrequired.

The content for a typical Risk Management Plan may be as follows:

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Description of Project

1.2 Objectives

1.3 Application

2.0 ORGANISATION

2.1 Project Organisation

2.2 Responsibilities

3.0 RISK IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION3.1 Identification of risks

3.2 Evaluation

3.3 Actions

3.4 Reports

This should be applied to each phase of the Project with specific regard to theengineering and design installation as these are the phases where most of thepotential hazards may be eliminated/controlled in the first place.

This exercise should be carried out through an ad-hoc Hazid Meeting calledand developed under the overall responsibility of the Project Manager.

These Hazid Meetings should e carried out throughout the various phases ofthe Project (i.e. Engineering, design installation, fabrication, installation etc.).

A competent Hazid team leader shall chair the meeting which is normallyattended by the representative(s) of the involved work disciplines.

The stages of the whole Hazid exercise are outlined within the next section.

The process of hazard identification should be applied to each activity in turn.Pre-determined deviations from normal conditions will enable an assessment

team to compile a comprehensive list of things that could realistically gowrong.


10/24




Each potential risk shall be identified and documented on the Risk Assessment

Report (see App. 1).5.3 Risk Assessments

STAGES OF THE RISK ASSESSMENT

Three main stages of risk assessment are carried out prior to workexecution.

Stage 1 is conducted by Managers/project personnel and other technicalfunctions that have ownership and/or are involved in the operation(s)being assessed.

This assessment is conducted towards the end of the project/equipmentdesign or engineering phase but well sufficiently in advance of the work toallow adequate lead time to implement the required control measures.

The hazards identification and risk assessment process shall beconducted in a form of a Brain Storming session where the StructureWhat If Techniques (SWIFT) is used to identify what realistically could gowrong.

This Brain Storming process may be facilitated by the use of the genericSWIFT checklist (see App. 6) and or other tailor made checklists in orderto better suit the scope of the risk assessment.

After the hazards have been identified, the subsequent risk ranking shallbe determined according to the criteria outlined within the risk assessmentSeverity Matrix (see App. 5).

The aim is to ensure that all aspects of the work have been assessedincluding contingency methods and control measures defined before goingto the worksite such as that all risks are classified As Low As ReasonablyPracticable (ALARP). The assessment should also consider recoverysituations when the work does not go according to the plan.

Appropriate Risk Owners shall be also identified and appointed during

this stage.Time limit for completion of the action shall be also clearly defined.

The appointed Risk Owners will manage the risks in such a way to:

Prioritise actions;

Schedule actions;

Allocate resources as required;

Assign responsibilities;

Monitor progress;

Track actions;


11/24




Ensure completion and formal close out of actions.

Stage 2 is normally carried out at the worksite by the personnel directlyinvolved in the supervision of the activities using the documented resultsof the Stage 1 assessment.

It is primarily instigated to confirming full understanding of the work andcontrol measures to be implemented but may be also used to furtherassess details of the work, control and recovery measures.

Stage 3 is usually called the Tool Box Talk (TBT) phase and it is carriedout as a pre-job briefing given by the Supervisors to the personnel directlyunder their control and who will be conducting the work.

Reference is made to the previous Stage 1 and 2 assessments and hasthe purpose of ensuring that all personnel fully understand the work, thecontrol measures, any recovery or contingency measures and theirresponsibilities in executing the job.

There is a degree of flexibility in how Stage 1 and 2 assessments arecarried out at the worksite; for example, they may be combined if allpersonnel attend the shift briefing and have the opportunity to discuss /raise further area of concerns.

What is of paramount importance is that everyone involved in the job isfully aware of his responsibilities; accept the risks and their relevant

control measures.

Hazards shall be identified for each task undergoing a risk assessmentand they will be analyzed to determine the Risk Value.

Risk Assessment is the combination of two criteria.

Risk = Consequences x Probability

Consequence

When analyzing the consequences, the following factors shall beconsidered:

Who/what can be directly or indirectly affected? (Fatal, major, moderate,minor or slight injury)

What environmental damage can occur? (Massive, major, medium, minoror slight effect)

What plant, process or equipment damage may result? (Total loss, major,medium, minor or slight damage)

All these factors contribute to loss, which is principally caused by theinteraction between people, the environment, materials and equipment.

Probability

When analyzing the likelihood, the following factors shall be consideredbased on the judgment of the likelihood of failure that:


12/24




Harm will occur:

- Very likely;- Likely;- Possible;- Unlikely;- Very unlikely;

Past history of the activity;

Previous incidents history.

5.4 Risk Assessment Criteria

The assessment of risks will define both the Probability of an event and theConsequence of that event.

These two attributes are used to determine the level of risk and the need formitigation measures to reduce the level of risk.

The level of risk (High, Medium and Low) will be assigned according to thecriteria outlined within the risk assessment Severity Matrix (see App. 5).

5.5 Detailed Risk Assessment Procedure

The Hazards Identification and Risk Assessment procedure comprises of 6main steps which are described hereunder.

1. Task Identification

2. Hazard Identification

3. Identify who/what may be harmed

4. Quantifying the risk

5. Applying control measures

6. Re-appraising the residual risk

STEP 1: TASK IDENTIFICATION

Step 1

Team identify all tasksin workscope

Do anyexistingHIRAs

partially matchscope?

Go to Step 2


13/24




STEP 2: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION

NO YESUse hazard checklist below

or your personal list

Step 2

Team identify all tasksin workscope

Does checklistcover allhazards?

Go to Step 3

Comments Output

Go to Step 3Add to your own checklist

Use hazard checklist below


14/24




STEP 3: WHO/WHAT MIGHT BE HARMED

NO YESUse hazard checklist belowor your personal list

Step 3

Identify who might beharmed

Does checklistcover allhazards?

Go to Step 4

Comments Output

Go to Step 4Add to your ownpersonal checklist

Use hazard checklist below

Identify what might beharmedUse hazard checklist below


15/24




STEP 4: QUANTIFY THE RISK

Step 4

What are the potential mostlikely consequences?

Go to Step 5

Output

Identify Risk level

Identify consequencelevel for each hazard

Identify probability levelfor each hazard


16/24




STEP 5: CONTROL MEASURES

NO YES

Step 5

List Control Measuresagainst each risk

Are controlmeasures coveredby standard criteria/

work practice?

Go to Step 6

Output

Go to Step 6Add new controls to your

personal list


17/24




STEP 6: RESIDUAL RISK

NO

YES

YES

YES

NO

Step 6

Re-evaluate residual riskwith control measures

in place

Is each residualrisk in L

category?

Job can proceedwith caution

Output

Monitor effectiveness ofcontrol

Repeat step 4

Can furthercontrols beidentified?

Re-evaluate residual riskwith further control in place

Is risk in Mcategory?

NO

Job can proceedwith management

authorisation

Job has H categoryrisk level and

Can not proceed

STOP


18/24




5.6 Handling The Risk

Following the process of risk assessment it will become evident that many riskswill be avoidable or their consequences reduced through the execution ofspecific risk reduction and mitigating actions.

The Project Manager shall consider the project risks commencing with the mostsignificant scores and decide on the measures to be taken to avoid them orreduce the consequence.

The following actions may be taken to handle the risk:

Do not accept if the risk level makes it unacceptable;

Transfer the risk to others (subcontractor or insurer) who may be in abetter position to handle the risk either due to experience (subcontractor) orstatistical compensation (insurer);

Instigate preventive measures (modify design, acquire equipment or carryout additional work etc.) always aware of the residual risk;

If the three actions above are not successful, include provisions to enablethat the project activities are carried out according to the required level ofsafety.

The above actions are not absolute and may therefore be used jointly.

5.7 Risk Reduction Measures

Once the risks have been assigned a Risk Value, they must be assessedagainst agreed acceptability criteria. The indication of the action and time scalefor addressing control measures is presented below.

5.8 Risk Reduction Hierarchy

Risk Reduction Hierarchy

1. Eliminate the risk by removing the hazard - design out theproblem at source.

2. Reduce the risk by substitution of a less hazardous process,activity or substance.

3. Isolate (protect everyone) by effective controls such asenclosing the hazard, removing the person from the hazard orreducing the persons exposure time to the hazard.

4. Install protective devices such as guards, emergency stops andtrip switches etc.

5. Enforce Permits-to-work, special rules and procedures to closely

control the hazard(s)6. Provide proper supervision / monitoring, supported by training,

instruction and relevant information


19/24




7. Provide Personal Protective Equipment only as a last resort

and in support of the above control measures

In addition to those above, other control measures may be required inaccordance with:

Legislation and Approved Codes of Practice;

Customer requirements;

International standards.

The purpose of the mitigation is to reduce the risk before it occurs.

The planned preventive actions will be identified according to the ALARPprinciple which states that, in order to control risks in the workplace, theresources (financial, human and material) which need to be applied tocontrol the risk are directly proportional to the level of risk.

The Risk Assessment Action Recordshall be used to specify whether therisk reduction measures have actually been implemented, will beimplemented, or is currently an option with the action decision dates notedwherever possible.

Once the relevant risk reduction measures have been agreed andincluded in the Risk Assessment Report each single action shall be

recorded by the use ofthe Risk Assessment Action Record.

The overall status of the required reduction measures shall be recordedwithin the Risk Assessment Action Record Summary Log.

On completion of the complete risk assessment process, action shall betaken by the Assessment Team Leader/Hazid Chairman to ensure that thenecessary controls are implemented.

This will be achieved by issuing the Risk Assessment Reporttogether withthe Risk Assessment Action Recordto the appropriate Manager of theoperation / activity covered by the assessment.

When a risk reduction measure has been agreed the ProjectManager/Vessel-Site Management shall be responsible forimplementation of this activity.

As the status of existing risks and the identification of new risks will alterthroughout the duration of the project, the Risk Assessment Report andthe related Risk Assessment Action Recordshall be regularly updated.

5.9 Risk Monitoring

The effectiveness of risk reduction measures can only be measured over

time and therefore continuous monitoring is required.Once risk reduction measures have been integrated into the relevant riskassessment reports, their progress shall be constantly monitored by the


20/24




Project Manager in conjunction with the Risk Manager (where appointed) /

HSE Manager and the Risk Owners.The monitoring shall be assured by regularly updating the relevant risk reportsand reviewing the status of actions.

5.10 Reporting and Records

On completion of Stage 1 Risk Assessment a formal report shall be issued.

This report shall have, as a minimum, the following content:

1. Introduction

Scope including a summary outline of the work tasks

2. Assessment Records

The completed forms

3. Recommendations

Control measures to be implemented (including the responsible personand time limit).

4. Appendices (as required).

As far as practicable, all activities identified as High (H) or Medium (M) Riskshall have control measures clearly defined and assessed during Stage 1 of the

Hazid meeting.

The appointed Risk Owner shall report the progress of relevant actions to theProject Manager and also ensure that any change in risk parameters or newrisks that have appeared are captured and managed accordingly.

Once actions are completed the final Hazid Report can be prepared andissued by the Project Manager.

Stage 2 risk assessments requires the involved forms from stage 1 to bereviewed and enhanced as needed with further appropriate worksite interfacecontrols.

When carrying out Stage 3 risk assessment or Tool Box Talk (TBT), thecompleted forms and permit to work if relevant, need to be kept on recordduring the entire life of the project.

Depending on the size and complexity of the project, the basis of reporting willbe by the following forms:

Risk Assessment Report(see App. 1): it is used during the Hazid meetingwhere the whole process of identifying and assessing and ranking the risksis documented.

Risk Assessment Actions Record (see App. 2); it used to individuallyrecord any further action which is required to be put in place prior to starting


21/24




the operations. Any individual action record will have to be formally closed

out by the identified risk owner prior to commencing the job. The status of risk assessment actions shall be recorded by use of the Risk

Assessment Action Record Summary Log (see App. 3): this is used toformally record all the required actions and track completion dates.

The requirements and method of reporting shall be determined at the start ofthe project by the Chief Project Manager/ Project Manager / QHSE Managerwith consideration of client requirements.

Reporting on mitigation activities and progress shall be considered animportant and essential part of the risk management process.

The reporting periods will be specified by the contract and reporting proceduresor as directed by the Project Manager.

New risks, which are identified in the middle of reporting periods, shall berecorded on the relevant forms and distributed as necessary.

Risk reporting will form part of the measurement and analysis for the continualimprovement process and input into future risk management processes.

All assessment records shall be filed and held by the relevant Risk Ownerwithin the respective project organization.

They shall be reviewed on a regular basis to ascertain if further assessments

are required and/or that the recommendations are being fully implemented /closed out.

Subcontractors Risks

The Project Manager assisted by the Project Representative responsiblefor each subcontractor shall be confident that:

The subcontractor has properly identified and assessed all of their risks.

Proper resources/measures are put in place to ensure adequatemonitoring over the effectiveness of the subcontractors control of theserisks.

Subcontractor shall be required to:

Manage the identification and assessment of risks pertinent to theirspheres of activities

Confirm whether their scope of work is covered by risk assessment

Conduct risk assessments as required by the Company

Formal reviews will then be performed to improve or validate the inputdata and to ensure that all significant risks have been identified in eacharea.

This review process will ensure:

Complete coverage of all aspects of the Project


22/24




Consistency of approach to risk management across the Project

5.11 Job Safety Analysis (JSA)/Work Rsik Analysis (WRA)

The aim of the Job Safety Analysis (JSA) is to clearly identify the hazards towhich an employee will be exposed to on a daily basis at the specific worksiteas they carry out their duties.

It is the responsibility of the Line Manager(s) to ensure that suitable JSA existfor all the operations carried out within their area of responsibility and that theyare reviewed and updated accordingly.

A JSA is a process, used to identify, analyze and record the steps involved in

performing a specific job.A WRA is a process, used to identify, analyze and record the steps involved inperforming a specific work.

RESPONSIBILITIES

The Line Management is responsible for the implementation of thewhole JSA process;

The supervisor in charge of the job is responsible for the executionof the JSA prior to starting the job.

The HSE personnel on board/sites (i.e., Safety Officer) acts as anadvisor during the whole JSA process and monitor correctimplementation.

The Project Management office representative is responsible forWRA .QHSE Manager acts as an advisor in WRA preparation.

PROCEDURES

Step 1:

The job is chronologically broken down into steps.

Each step describes a stand-alone activity or task.Step 2:

Each step is analyzed with the workers involved. The potential hazardsassociated with the steps are identified and discussed. The risk arisingfrom the hazards are evaluated. Relevant risks are recorded accordingly.

The trigger word to start and carry out the whole exercise is What if?

The questions to be answered during this second step are, but not limitedto the following:

What can go wrong?

What could be the consequences?

How could it happen?


23/24




What are the contributing factors?

In order to facilitate the What if?process, the generic JSA checklist maybe used (see App. 7).

Other specific checklists could be also used to better suit the scope of theJSA.

Step 3:

When the risks are assessed, it is crucial to determine methods to mitigatethem.

The methods may include:

Technical controls to :- Eliminate / minimize the hazards like redesigning equipment,

remove the hazards, etc. such as installing ventilation,- Isolate the hazard with machine guards, welding curtains, etc.,- Enclose the hazards using enclosures for noisy equipment, etc.

Administrative controls such as Permit To Work, work instructions,alarms, warnings, training, etc.

Personal Protective Equipment when technical controls do noteliminate the hazards, when safe work practices do not providesufficient controls may not be feasible.

All these mitigation methods can be combined.

The mitigation methods are recorded and the responsible person for theimplementation is nominated.

Step 4:

The results of JSA are discussed with the full team of workers assigned tothe job before the beginning of the works during a pre-job meeting/ToolBox Talk (TBT).

Step 5:

The JSA has to be reviewed and updated periodically to determinewhether changes are needed in the job procedure or in the preventivemeasures or in the actions taken previously.


24/24

GENERAL PROCEDURE

MANAGEMENT OF RISKS

Doc. n: ZOM-MRP-006

REV. 0 DATE 30/06/05

PAGE : 23 OF 23

APPENDICES

1. RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT -

2. RISK ASSESSMENT ACTION RECORD

3. RISK ASSESSMENT ACTION RECORD SUMMARY LOG

4. JOB SAFETY ANALYSIS

5. SEVERITY MATRIX

6. JSA CHECKLIST

zom mrp 006(management of risks)

Documents