zekeriya aktürk, prof. atatürk university medical faculty , class 1 25.10.2010, erzurum

27
/ 27 1 Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof. Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 1 25.10.2010, Erzurum Biostatistics Biostatistics Introduction Introduction http://aile.atauni.edu.tr [email protected]

Upload: talbot

Post on 13-Feb-2016

69 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Biostatistics Introduction. Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof. Atatürk University Medical Faculty , Class 1 25.10.2010, Erzurum. http://aile.atauni.edu.tr [email protected]. Aims – Objectives . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof. Atatürk  University Medical Faculty ,  Class  1 25.10.2010, Erzurum

/ 271

Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof.

Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 1

25.10.2010, Erzurum

BiostatisticsBiostatisticsIntroductionIntroduction

http://aile.atauni.edu.tr

[email protected]

Page 2: Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof. Atatürk  University Medical Faculty ,  Class  1 25.10.2010, Erzurum

/ 272

Page 3: Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof. Atatürk  University Medical Faculty ,  Class  1 25.10.2010, Erzurum

/ 273

Aims – Objectives • At the end of this lecture, the participants should

defend the importance of research and have basic information about research and biostatistics.– Name the steps of research– Formulate an answerable clinical question– Classify types of data– Mention features of a data– Classify different types of studies– Explain cohort, case control, and randomized

controlled studies

Page 4: Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof. Atatürk  University Medical Faculty ,  Class  1 25.10.2010, Erzurum

/ 274

Lets do a study togetherAU Medical Faculty Students and Research

Aktürk Z. Erzurum. October 25, 2009

Page 5: Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof. Atatürk  University Medical Faculty ,  Class  1 25.10.2010, Erzurum

/ 275

Bir literatür

Askew, DA. et al. GPs involvement in and attitudes to research. Med J Aust 2002;177(2):74-77

Page 6: Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof. Atatürk  University Medical Faculty ,  Class  1 25.10.2010, Erzurum

/ 276

Stages of a study

1. Ask a question2. Is the question already answered?3. Formulate hypothesis4. Design the method5. Apply 6. Perform analysis7. Discussion8. Report

Tyler CW, Epidemyology

Page 7: Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof. Atatürk  University Medical Faculty ,  Class  1 25.10.2010, Erzurum

/ 277

Most important: ideaMy research panel

Idea Method Application Report1. Knowledge and use

of the public on herbal remedies

2. Effect of constipation on cognitive functions

3. .

1. Medical specialty training in Turkey

2. .

1. Effect of structured exercise on weight loss

2. .

1. Osteoporosis prevalence among women in Edirne

2. .

Page 8: Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof. Atatürk  University Medical Faculty ,  Class  1 25.10.2010, Erzurum

/ 278

How to gather ideas?

• Clinical practice• Work environment• Ideas from patients• Colleagues• Unexpected health outcomes• …

Page 9: Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof. Atatürk  University Medical Faculty ,  Class  1 25.10.2010, Erzurum

/ 279

Answerable clinical question•Patient/problem Hasta/problem•Intervention Girişim•Comparison Karşılaştırma•Outcomes Sonuç/Çıktı

Is there any difference among a calorie diet and a glycemic diet in decreasing body mass index of obese women?

Centre for EBM http:www.cebm.net/

Page 10: Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof. Atatürk  University Medical Faculty ,  Class  1 25.10.2010, Erzurum

/ 2710

Is your question answered?

• Literature search• Teachers• Colleagues• Books• Internet• …

Page 11: Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof. Atatürk  University Medical Faculty ,  Class  1 25.10.2010, Erzurum

/ 2711

Formulating a hypothesis

• H0 – There is no difference between a calorie diet and a

glycemic diet in decreasing body mass index of obese women?

• H1 – There is a difference between a calorie diet and a

glycemic diet in decreasing body mass index of obese women?

Page 12: Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof. Atatürk  University Medical Faculty ,  Class  1 25.10.2010, Erzurum

/ 2712

Types of studies(How to answer the question?)

• Observation– Case report– Prevalance– Case control– Cohost studies– Qualitative studies

• Intervention– Randomized controlled studies

• Methodologic– Validity– Reliability

Page 13: Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof. Atatürk  University Medical Faculty ,  Class  1 25.10.2010, Erzurum

/ 2713

Case control study

Cases Controls

Exposed Not exposed Exposed Not exposedT

IME

Page 14: Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof. Atatürk  University Medical Faculty ,  Class  1 25.10.2010, Erzurum

/ 2714

Cohort study

Diseases Healthy

Exposed Not exposed

T I M

EDiseased Healthy

Population

Page 15: Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof. Atatürk  University Medical Faculty ,  Class  1 25.10.2010, Erzurum

/ 2715

Randomized controlled study

Sick Improved

A therapy B therapy

T I M

E

Sick Improved

Population

Randomization

Page 16: Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof. Atatürk  University Medical Faculty ,  Class  1 25.10.2010, Erzurum

/ 2716

Statistical analysis

• Features of data– Current– Reliable– Correct– Complete– Appropriate to use– Appropriate for aim

Page 17: Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof. Atatürk  University Medical Faculty ,  Class  1 25.10.2010, Erzurum

/ 2717

Statistical analysis

• Frequency distribution• Importance tests (hypothesis tests)

– Student t-test– ANOVA– Chi square– Mann-Whitney U test– McNemar test– Wilcoxon – Fisher exact test– …

Page 18: Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof. Atatürk  University Medical Faculty ,  Class  1 25.10.2010, Erzurum

/ 2718

Page 19: Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof. Atatürk  University Medical Faculty ,  Class  1 25.10.2010, Erzurum

/ 2719

Lets do an example

• Stages of a study1. Ask a question2. Is the question already answered?3. Formulate hypothesis4. Design the method5. Apply 6. Perform analysis7. Discussion8. Report

Page 20: Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof. Atatürk  University Medical Faculty ,  Class  1 25.10.2010, Erzurum

/ 2720

Page 21: Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof. Atatürk  University Medical Faculty ,  Class  1 25.10.2010, Erzurum

/ 2721

Ask a question

• Is there any difference in recognizing “thyme” between class 1 and class 6 medical students?

Page 22: Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof. Atatürk  University Medical Faculty ,  Class  1 25.10.2010, Erzurum

/ 2722

Was the question answered?

• Aktürk Z ve ark.– Medical students have problems in recognizing

herbs. Class six students are better in recognizing.

Genel Tıp Derg 2003;16(3):101-106

Page 23: Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof. Atatürk  University Medical Faculty ,  Class  1 25.10.2010, Erzurum

/ 2723

Hypothesis

• H0: There is no difference in recognizing “thyme” between class 1 and class 6 medical students?

• H1: There is a difference in recognizing “thyme” between class 1 and class 6 medical students?

Page 24: Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof. Atatürk  University Medical Faculty ,  Class  1 25.10.2010, Erzurum

/ 2724

Method

• The following picture was shown to students from class 1 and 6 by a data projector

Page 25: Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof. Atatürk  University Medical Faculty ,  Class  1 25.10.2010, Erzurum

Statistics – Frequency distribution

/ 2725

Kekik resmini tanýdý mý

115 63,2 63,5 63,566 36,3 36,5 100,0

181 99,5 100,01 ,5

182 100,0

HayýrEvetTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

SINIF

115 63,2 63,2 63,267 36,8 36,8 100,0

182 100,0 100,0

16Total

ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent

CumulativePercent

Page 26: Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof. Atatürk  University Medical Faculty ,  Class  1 25.10.2010, Erzurum

Statistics – hypothesis testing

/ 2726

SINIF * Kekik resmini tanýdý mý Crosstabulation

101 14 11587,8% 12,2% 100,0%

14 52 6621,2% 78,8% 100,0%

115 66 18163,5% 36,5% 100,0%

Count% within SINIFCount% within SINIFCount% within SINIF

1

6

SINIF

Total

Hayýr Evet

Kekik resmini tanýdýmý

Total

Chi-Square Tests

80,317b 1 ,00077,468 1 ,00084,089 1 ,000

,000 ,00079,874 1 ,000

181

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is24,07.

b.

Page 27: Zekeriya Aktürk, Prof. Atatürk  University Medical Faculty ,  Class  1 25.10.2010, Erzurum

/ 2727

Conclusion

• While 12% of class 1 students correctly recognized thyme, this was 78% in class 6.

• Although class 6 students are better in recognizing thyme, still 22% are not successfull in recognizing.

• There is a significant difference between class 1 and 6 students in recognizing thyme (p<0,001).