y11 unit 3 montage editing crit. a

Upload: alison-wong

Post on 06-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 Y11 Unit 3 Montage Editing Crit. A

    1/2

    Y11 MYP Film Elective

    Criterion A Task 3The Soviet Montage Documentary

    Name _______________________ Date Due ________________________

    Task Description

    Students must produce a script for a short documentary production. Among the topics students may

    choose to investigate are:

    1) Soviet Montage vs. Continuity Editing,

    2) An indepth study of the film, Battleship Potemkinand its context within Soviet Cinema.

    The topic should be discussed primarily in cinematic terms. The script must clearly indicate the

    relationship between the audio and visual elements of the documentary, employing an established

    documentary format such as side-by-side columns for video and audio components. All descriptions

    of video and audio elements must be both detailed and specific. Scripts must be 6-8 pages long, using

    an accepted size of paper (for example, A4 or US letter) and must use 12 point Courier font (not in

    block capitals) and single spacing. It is important that the student treats the topic in cinematic rather

    than literary terms.

    Students are expected to show in their documentaries:

    - Understanding of, and engagement with, the film history/film theory topic (Soviet Montage);

    -

    Engagement with the target audience

    - Excellent scope and depth of argument;

    - Excellent use of sources and the structure of the script.

    - Detailed, clearly and coherently described visual and audio elements;

    LOA Task Specific Descriptor

    0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.

    1-2

    There is little or no understanding of the film history/film theory topic. Engagement

    with the target audience, scope and depth of argument and the

    structure of the script are all limited. Visual and audio elements are incompletely

    described and poorly linked.

    3-4

    There is some understanding of the film history/film theory topic. Engagement

    with the target audience, scope and depth of argument and

    the structure of the script are relevant in parts, but still limited. Visual and audio

    elements are fairly well described, although links may be inconsistent.

    5-6

    There is an adequate understanding of the film history/film theory topic.

    Engagement with the target audience, scope and depth of argument and the structure of the script are

    adequate. Visual and audio elements are well described and satisfactorily linked.

    5-6

    There is a good understanding of the film history/film theory topic. Engagement

    with the target audience, scope and depth of argument, and the structure of the script are good. Visual

    and audio elements are clearly and coherently described and are, in the main, aptly linked.

    7-8

    There is an excellent understanding of, and engagement with, the film history/

    film theory topic. Engagement with the target audience, scope and depth of

    argument, and the structure of the script are excellent. Visual

    and audio elements are detailed, clearly and coherently described, and are aptlyand proficiently linked.

    Student Grade & Comments: Teacher Grade & Comments:

  • 8/3/2019 Y11 Unit 3 Montage Editing Crit. A

    2/2