xrd: structural analysis at list · xrd pattern of a bilayered coating on wc substrate (v. hody) ω...
TRANSCRIPT
XRD: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AT LIST
1
• Yves Fleming
• Jérôme Bour
• Introduction to structure and structural analysis
• XRD facilities at LIST
• Examples:
• Powder analysis
• Thin film analysis
• Phase identification
• Phase transformations
• Stress analysis
• Texture analysis and pole figures
• X-Ray reflectometry
• SAXS / WAXS
• Further developments
Outline
OVERVIEW
2
Crystalline versus amorphous structure: SiO2 example
STRUCTURE
3
• The crystal structure describes the atomic arrangement of a material.
• When the atoms are arranged differently, a different diffraction pattern is
produced (ie. glass vs. cristobalite)
Quartz Cristobalite Glass
Information from diffraction spectra: SiO2 Example
STRUCTURE
4
• These three phases of SiO2 are chemically identical
• The amorphous glass does not have long-range atomic order and therefore produces only broad scattering peaks
• Quartz and cristobalite have two different crystal structures • The Si and O atoms are arranged differently
• Both have structures with long-range atomic order
• The difference in their crystal structure is reflected in their different diffraction patterns
Position [°2Theta] (Copper (Cu)) 20 30 40 50
Counts
0
2000
4000
0 1000
2000
3000
4000
0
2000
4000
SiO2 Glass
Quartz
Cristobalite
• Cu Kα (and Mo Kα) X-ray sources
• Parallel beam configuration (Göbbel mirror)
• Point/line focused beam capabilities
• Energy Sensitive Detector and scintillator
• Eulerian cradle
• Hot stage
• Mainly used for :
• Grazing incidence analysis
• Phase identification
• Rocking curves
• X-Ray reflectometry
• Residual stress analysis
• Texture analysis
Bruker D8 Discovery
Bruker D8 Discovery
INSTRUMENTS AVAILABLE @ LIST
5
• Cu Kα X-ray source
• Parallel beam as well as parafocusing beam configurations
• Possibility to use programmable slits
• Transmission configuration • Small Angle X-Ray scattering (SAXS)
• Wide Angle X-Ray scattering (WAXS)
• Point/line focused beam capabilities
• 1D-Position Sensitive Detector
• Cryo-stage and hot stage
• Rel. Humidity chamber
• Mainly used for: • Powder analysis
• Phase identification
• X-Ray reflectometry
• Semi-quantitative as well as quantitative phase analysis
Panalytical X’Pert Pro
Panalytical X’Pert Pro
INSTRUMENTS AVAILABLE @ LIST
6
Classical Reflection
ANALYSIS OF POWDERS
7
• The incident angle, w, is defined between the X-ray source and the sample.
• The diffraction angle, 2q, is defined between the incident beam and the detector.
• In the Bragg-Brentano geometry, the diffraction vector (s) is always normal to the sample surface.
s
Powder diffraction
ANALYSIS OF POWDERS
8
2q 2q 2q
For every set of planes, there will be a small percentage of crystallites that are properly
oriented to diffract
Basic assumptions of powder diffraction:
For every set of planes, there is an equal number of crystallites that will diffract
There is a statistically relevant number of crystallites
s
[100] [110]
s s
[200]
Grazing Incidence
THIN FILM ANALYSIS
9
ωi=0.5º: top layer ωi=3º
Substrate (blue index)
XRD pattern of a bilayered coating on WC substrate (V. Hody)
ωi
WC substrate
coating 2θ
fixed
BF-TEM image TiAlTaN
900 ºC (6 hrs)
200 nm
Crystalline coating
A larger incidence angle ωi increases penetration depth Characterisation of thin films using XRD is possible
Temperature chambers
ANALYSIS OF PHASE TRANSFORMATIONS
10
• Hot stage characteristics:
• From room temp. up to 1100°C
• Vacuum (down to 10-2 mbar)
• Controlled atmosphere
(inert gas: H2, N2, Ar)
• Temperature chamber characteristics:
• -193°C up to 450°C ( in vacuum)
• Ambient up to 300°C (in controlled atm.)
• Rel. humidity generator:
• between 5% and 90 % at 25°C
Phase transformations in thin films
ANALYSIS OF PHASE TRANSFORMATIONS
11 V. Khetan et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 4115−4125
• X-ray diffraction spectra of an Al0.48Ti0.4Ta0.12N hard
coating.
• Analysis in grazing incidence
• heat treatment up to @ 950°C, atm. pressure, air
The structure changes with temperature
BF-TEM image TiAlTaN
900 ºC (6 hrs)
200 nm
Crystalline oxide bilayer
Temperature induced phase changes in organic material
ANALYSIS OF PHASE TRANSFORMATIONS
12
12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 282Theta (°)
0
1
4
9
16
Inte
nsity (
cps)
12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 282Theta (°)
0
1
4
9
16
Inte
nsity (
cps)
12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 282Theta (°)
0
1
4
9
16
Inte
nsity (
cps)
25 °C 190 °C 140 °C
12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 282Theta (°)
0
1
4
9
16
Inte
nsity (
cps)
130 °C
30 s 30 s 30 s
30 s
DoC = 48 % DoC = 0 %
DoC = 45 %
30 s
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
0 500 1000 1500 2000
TIME (S)
TE
MP
ER
AT
UR
E (
°C)
DoC = 0 %
Change in degree of crystallinity
(DoC) with temperature
Residual Stress Analysis
STRESS ANALYSIS
13
Experimental set-up
• Parallel beam configuration
• χ-mode (Eulerian cradle)
(Reference: www.stanford.edu/group/glam/xlab/MatSci162_172/LectureNotes/05_Stress&Texture.pdf)
Ψ Ψ Ψ
Ψ>0 Ψ<0
Biaxial or uniaxial
stress Triaxial stress Texture
Intensity
150.0 152.4 154.8 157.2 159.6 (º2θ)
For different values of χ=Ψ
sin2 y method
Macrostrain / residual stress in
terp
lan
ar s
pac
ing
Investigation of Texture
TEXTURE ANALYSIS
14
• Eulerian Cradle:
sample tilt: 0º< χ < 90º
sample rotation: 0º< ϕ < 360º
Example: Texture on rolled metal sample Investigation of industrial processes by texture:
Pole figures are symmetrical around ϕ=0º and ϕ=90º
Measured PF 200
Measured PF 111
Measured PF 220
Measured PF 311
RD
TD
Powders, dispersions Liquid crystals, Gels Fibres, Single crystals
Presence of texture
(picture by www.anton-paar.com)
Crystallite Size and Microstress
DETERMINATION OF CRYSTALLITE SIZE
15
As size of crystallite decreases, width of
diffraction peak increases
Size
broadening
26.5 27.0 27.5 28.0 28.5 29.0 29.5 30.0 2 q (deg.)
Inte
nsity (
a.u
.)
Microstress
broadening
Microstress can be introduced by: • surface tension of nanoparticles • morphology of crystal shape, such as nanotubes • interstitial impurities
In case where microstress is small, crystallite size can be determined
Layer thickness determination by XRR
X-RAY REFLECTOMETRY
16 VISICAT project (O. Ishchenko, D. Lenoble)
From fall in intensity and
period of interference fringes
• Thickness of thin films and multilayers
• Surface and interface roughness
From qc
• Material density
TiO2 layer thickness: 28 nm
model measured
Si substrate
TiO2 coating
(Measurement by I. Infante Canero and Y. Fleming)
Quantification of crystalline phases and amorphous content
QUANTITATIVE PHASE ANALYSIS
17
Position [°2Theta] (Copper (Cu))
25 30 35 40 45
Counts
0
400
1600
3600
TiO2, Rutile 49.4 %
Fe2O3, Hematite 28.7 %
TiO2, Anatase 21.9 %
• Ways to estimate the amorphous phase content:
• By estimating the Degree of Crystallinity (DoC)
• By using a standard of known crystallinity (several methods)
Rutile, 49 wt%
Anatase, 22 wt%
Hematite, 29 wt%
(Scott A Speakman, Ph.D., http://prism.mit.edu/xray)
Small Angle X-ray Scattering vs. Wide Angle X-ray Scattering
TRANSMISSION IMAGING: SAXS/WAXS
18
• SAXS provides: • Shape of particles
• Size of particles
• Particles’ surface per volume
• Particle characteristics:
• Liquid, solid or gaseous domains dispersed within a light
matrix
• 1 nm < size < 100 nm
• Concentration > 1 wt. %
• WAXS provides:
• Crystal nature
• Lattice parameters
• Crystal Amount
• Crystal Orientation
(picture by www.anton-paar.com)
Analysis of polystyrene/ZrO2 (95/5) nanocomposite
SAXS EXAMPLE
19
1) Un-treated data 2) Corrections
3) Modelling
Spherical shape (model fitting)
Average diameter: 650 Å
Surface per volume: 0.136 Å-1
4) Analysis using the model curve
background subtraction absorption correction desmearing
Nanoclay structure alone
Polyamide + 5 wt.% nanoclay
18.3 Å 48.9 Å
Study of polymer / nanofiller interaction in the case of nanoclay
WAXS EXAMPLE
20
Nanoclay intersheet distance from the (001) peak
The increase in clay intersheet distance indicates an intercalation mechanism
Structure changes due to load
ONGOING DEVELOPMENT
21
Primary
optics
Miniature-tensile
device
Secondary
optics
• Coupling of tensile device and X-ray
scattering
• Identification of deformation mechanisms
of soft materials in terms of chain
orientation and damage
For more information, see Frederic Addiego’s presentation this afternoon
22
Thank you for your attention!