WP6 EvaluationEuroHealthNet

Cristina ChiotanPublic Health Coordinator

• AUSTRIA: Austrian Health Promotion Foundation

• BELGIUM: Flemish Institute for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention

• BULGARIA: National Centre of Public Health Protection

• CROATIA: National Institute of Public Health

• CZECH REPUBLIC: National Institute of Public Health

• DENMARK: National Board of Health

• UK: • Department of Health

• • Kent & Medway NHS

• • North West Health Office

• ESTONIA: National Institute for Health Development

• FRANCE: National Institute for Prevention and Health Education (INPES)

• FINLAND: Finnish Centre for Health Promotion

• GERMANY: Federal Centre for Health Education (BZgA)

• GREECE: Institute of Preventive Medicine, Environmental &

• Occupational Health Prolepsis

• FINLAND: National Institute for Health and Welfare

• Finnish Society for Social and Health - SOSTE

• HUNGARY: • Hungarian National Institute for Health Development (OEFI)

• • University of Debrecen

• ITALY: Veneto Region

• LATVIA: The Centre of Health Economics

• NETHERLANDS: • NIGZ: Netherlands Institute for Health Promotion

• • RIVM: Netherlands Institute Public Health and the Environment

41 members and partners in 27 European countries

NORWAY: Norwegian Directorate of Health

POLAND: National Institute of Hygiene – Public Health Research Institute

ROMANIA: Institute of Public Health Iasi

SCOTLAND: NHS Health Scotland

SLOVAKIA: Public Health Authority of the Slovak Republic

SLOVENIA: • National Institute of Public Health

• Institute of Public Health Murska Sobota

SPAIN: • Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo

• Universidad de La Laguna

SWEDEN: Stockholm County Council

SWITZERLAND: Health Promotion Switzerland

WALES: Public Health Wales

IRELAND Institute of Public Health

MONTENEGRO Institute of Public Health

ROMANIA National Institute of Public Health

SWEDEN Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions

- Reducing Health Inequalities- Combat NCDs- Health Promotion for sustainable

health systems

Policy development

Project participation

Networking

Communication

Health Inequalities are persistent and increasing

EuroHealthNetEuroHealthNet The European Partnership for Improving Healthy Equity and

Wellbeing

PHASEPHASE

The European Platform for Action on Health & Social

Equity

HPEHPEHealth Promotion Health Promotion

EuropeEurope

The European Network

for Health Promotion

CIRICIRI

The European Centre for Innovation,

Research & Implementation in

Health & Wellbeing

Evaluation

WHY?

•To support Consortium performance;

•To collectively identify and respond to problems;

•To maximise impact and ensure sustainability.

HOW?

Through project’s products, interviews and questionnaires

WHO?

All project partners

AHA.SI Evaluation

Draft Evaluation Framework

based on project’s work-plan, timeframe, deliverables including process, output and outcome indicators

to be commented by WP leads and agreed by all

Guiding Principles for Active Ageing and Solidarity between Generations;

The Active Ageing Index;

Social Investment Package.

AHA.SI Evaluation

Review processes: meetings, event reports; questionnaires and interviews;

Analyse outputs: schedule and content (3 external experts);

Assess outcomes: stakeholders views on impact

•3 interim reports and one final report

Logic model:

More seniors employed

More active and healthy seniors

More LTC

Higher public awareness

Feasibility of Strategy

Cooperation health and social sectorspolicy

..

Networking

Awarenesscampaign

Strategy (3 position papers)

Networking

Conferences

Review of best practices

Situation analysis

Examples

Specific objective:

Network of different sectors at different levels

•Process indicators: no. of meetings organised, reports, etc.;

•Output indicators: satisfaction and impact; follow up colaborations (questionnaires, interviews)

•Outcome indicators: the network allows better strategy implementation (interviews)

Examples

Specific objective:

Greater public and target groups awareness

•Process indicators: campaign, communication (WP5 products)

•Output indicators: no. of people reached, materials produced, no. of events dissemination etc.

•Outcome indicators: public awareness evaluation study

Short-term outcomes:public awareness

Components Indicators Method

context Aspects that may have an influence on the campaign

Reach % of population (subgroups?) having heard of the campaign

Dose delivered Number and type of messages delivered

Dose received % of population (subgroups?) aware of …Or agree with the new strategy?

fidelity Degree to which the messages reflected well the strategy

Example: networking

Components Indicators Method

intention Knowing counterpartTrust

QInterview ***

activities Exchange of newslettersCabinet committeesJoined budgetingDelegated financingHealth conferences (collaborative governance)Industry engagement

Thank you!

Cristina Chiotan

c.chiotan@eurohealthnet.eu

Ingrid Stegeman

i.stegeman@eurohealthnet.eu

Cristina ChiotanPublic Health Coordinator