04/07/23Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati1

World's Worst EvaluatorsWorld's Worst Evaluators

Original Concept by:Steve Howard, ACGandMark D’Silva, ATM-S

Presented by: ATM-G Raju Mandhyan and ATM-S Khris Albano

04/07/23Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati2

The Extra TerrestrialThe Extra Terrestrial

Does not know what the speech was all about.

Has no idea whatsoever of the objectives to be achieved

Talks about out of the world issues, gossip, etc.

Ends up using valuable time and space during a meeting.

Needs to be “beamed back by Scottie.”

04/07/23Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati3

The EditorThe Editor

Is an advanced, high-class Nit-PickerEvaluates only language, forgets the

whole package of the presentationPrimarily puts forward own literary

views unknown to anyoneSpeaker gets de-motivated because of

the narrow perspective.

04/07/23Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati4

The CriticThe Critic

Fault finding machine for Substance, Structure and Style

Appreciates nothing, offers no STGOs.Effect (not intent) Speaker’s self-

esteem goes to the dogs Critics are self-absorbed, they don’t

realize they are being so negative

04/07/23Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati5

The Uni-CuristThe Uni-Curist

Has one kind of cure/feedback for all presentations

Generally makes comments about– Eye contact without explaining the benefits

thereof– Body language for the sake of talking about

body language– Etc;

Adds little new learning for the speaker.

04/07/23Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati6

Mr. Nice GuyMr. Nice GuyHas nothing but praise for every

aspect of the presentationOmits STGO’s because emphasis is

on praise onlyIs liberal with words like “fantastic,”

“fabulous,” “superb,” until they become meaningless

Comes across as shallow and insincere

04/07/23Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati7

The StarThe Star

Treats Speaker’s performance as secondary

Uses evaluation to promote SelfOverkills with personal skillsUses inane techniques, gimmicks +

lot of drama.Provides little constructive feedback

04/07/23Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati8

The Sleaze-ballThe Sleaze-ball

Gushes over appearance of speakerHardly pays attention to what is said

because he/she is so captivated by looks alone

Most suggestions are about improvement of appearance and looks

Ends up annoying the speaker

04/07/23Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati9

How To Be a Bad EvaluatorHow To Be a Bad Evaluator Evaluate as if you were E.T Edit as if you were Shakespeare Criticize speaker until he shrinks to death Provide one set of solutions for all kinds of

problems Flatter the speaker till her head floats in fatty

poo Smile, gush and constantly talk about yourself

until everyone leaves the room Slurp, lick and suck-up to the speaker till he/she

wants you to be padlocked in a pub.

04/07/23Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati10

How How NotNot to be a Bad Evaluator to be a Bad Evaluator

Have fair knowledge of the principles of Public Speaking

Read and know objectives of speech project Listen actively, objectively and with a goal to

improve presentation and help speaker Shortlist suggestions and praise speech and

performance highlight Chuck out own ego and own bias Be genuine, gentle and giving towards the

speaker Keep feedback short, sweet and well structured

04/07/23Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati11

Ultimate Purpose is to…Ultimate Purpose is to…

Coach the Speaker to Improve

04/07/23Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati12

World's Best EvaluatorsWorld's Best Evaluators

Presented By: ATM-G Raju Mandhyan and ATM-S Khris Albano