world journal of - microsoft · world journal of w j r radiology the world journal of radiology...

Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc

World Journal of RadiologyWorld J Radiol 2017 August 28; 9(8): 321-338

ISSN 1949-8470 (online)

EDITORS-IN-CHIEFKai U Juergens, BremenEdwin JR van Beek, EdinburghThomas J Vogl, Frankfurt

GUEST EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERSWing P Chan, TaipeiChung-Huei Hsu, Taipei Chin-Chang Huang, TaipeiTsong-Long Hwang, TaoyuanJung-Lung Hsu, TaipeiChia-Hung Kao, TaichungYu-Ting Kuo, Tainan Hon-Man Liu, Taipei Hui-Lung Liang, KaohsiungChun Chung Lui, KaohsiungSen-Wen Teng, Taipei Yung-Liang (William) Wan, Taoyuan

MEMBERS OF THE EDITORIAL BOARD

Afghanistan

Takao Hiraki, Okayama

Argentina

Patricia Carrascosa, Vicente LopezMaria C Ziadi, Rosario

Australia

Lourens Bester, SydneyGemma A Figtree, Sydney

Stuart M Grieve, SydneyWai-Kit Lee, FitzroyPrabhakar Ramachandran, Melbourne

Austria

Herwig R Cerwenka, GrazGudrun M Feuchtner, InnsbruckBenjamin Henninger, InnsbruckRupert Lanzenberger, ViennaShu-Ren Li, ViennaVeronika Schopf, ViennaTobias De Zordo, Innsbruck

Belgium

Steve Majerus, LiegeKathelijne Peremans, Merelbeke

Brazil

Clerio F Azevedo, Rio de JaneiroPatrícia P Alfredo, São PauloEduardo FC Fleury, São PauloEdward Araujo Júnior, São PauloWellington P Martins, Ribeirao PretoRicardo A Mesquita, Belo HorizonteVera MC Salemi, São PauloClaudia Szobot, Porto AlegreLilian YI Yamaga, São Paulo

Canada

Marie Arsalidou, TorontoOtman A Basir, Waterloo

Tarik Zine Belhocine, TorontoJames Chow, TorontoTae K Kim, TorontoAnastasia Oikonomou, Toronto

China

Hong-Wei Chen, WuxiFeng Chen, HangzhouJian-Ping Chu, GuangzhouGuo-Guang Fan, ShenyangBu-Lang Gao, ShijiazhuangQi-Yong Gong, ChengduYing Han, BeijingXian-Li Lv, BeijingYi-Zhuo Li, GuangzhouXiang-Xi Meng, HarbinYun Peng, BeijingJun Shen, GuangzhouZe-Zhou Song, HangzhouWai Kwong Tang, Hong KongGang-Hua Tang, GuangzhouJie Tian, BeijingLu-Hua Wang, BeijingXiao-bing Wang, Xi'anYi-Gen Wu, NanjingKai Wu, GuangzhouHui-Xiong Xu, ShanghaiZuo-Zhang Yang, KunmingXiao-Dan Ye, ShanghaiDavid T Yew, Hong KongTing-He Yu, ChongqingZheng Yuan, ShanghaiMin-Ming Zhang, HangzhouYudong Zhang, NanjingDong Zhang, ChongQingWen-Bin Zeng, Changsha

Editorial Board2014-2017

World Journal of RadiologyW J R

The World Journal of Radiology Editorial Board consists of 365 members, representing a team of worldwide experts in radiology. They are from 36 countries, including Afghanistan (1), Argentina (2), Australia (5), Austria (7), Belgium (2), Brazil (8), Canada (6), Chile (1), China (43), Croatia (1), Denmark (4), Egypt (6), France (5), Germany (22), Greece (10), India (12), Iran (6), Ireland (2), Israel (3), Italy (47), Japan (13), Netherlands (1), New Zealand (1), Pakistan (1), Poland (2), Portugal (1), Serbia (1), Singapore (3), Slovakia (1), South Korea (18), Spain (4), Sweden (2), Switzerland (4), Thailand (1), Turkey (26), United Kingdom (11), and United States (82).

I January 28, 2014WJR|www.wjgnet.com

Yue-Qi Zhu, Shanghai

Croatia

Goran Kusec, Osijek

Denmark

Poul E Andersen, OdenseLars J Petersen, AalborgThomas Z Ramsoy, FrederiksbergMorten Ziebell, Copenhagen

Egypt

Mohamed F Bazeed, MansouraMohamed Abou El-Ghar, MansouraReem HA Mohamed, CairoMohamed R Nouh, AlexandriaAhmed AKA Razek, MansouraAshraf A Zytoon, Shebin El-Koom

France

Sabine F Bensamoun, CompiègneRomaric Loffroy, DijonStephanie Nougaret, MontpellierHassane Oudadesse, RennesVincent Vinh-Hung, Fort-de-France

Germany

Henryk Barthel, LeipzigPeter Bannas, HamburgMartin Beeres, FrankfurtIlja F Ciernik, DessauA Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, HeidelbergPeter A Fasching, ErlanegnAndreas G Schreyer, RegensburgPhilipp Heusch, DuesseldorfSonja M Kirchhoff, MunichSebastian Ley, MunichAdel Maataoui, Frankfurt am MainStephan M Meckel, FreiburgHans W Muller, DuesseldorfKay Raum, BerlinDirk Rades, LuebeckMarc-Ulrich Regier, HamburgAlexey Surov, HalleMartin Walter, MagdeburgAxel Wetter, EssenChristoph Zilkens, Düsseldorf

Greece

Panagiotis Antoniou, ThessalonikiNikos Efthimiou, AthensDimitris Karnabatidis, PatrasGeorge Latsios, AthensStylianos Megremis, Iraklion

Alexander D Rapidis, AthensKiki Theodorou, LarissaIoannis A Tsalafoutas, AthensEvanthia E Tripoliti, IoanninaAthina C Tsili, Ioannina

India

Ritesh Agarwal, ChandigarhChandan J Das, New DelhiPrathamesh V Joshi, MumbaiNaveen Kalra, ChandigarhChandrasekharan Kesavadas, TrivandrumJyoti Kumar, New DelhiAtin Kumar, New DelhiKaushala P Mishra, AllahabadDaya N Sharma, New DelhiBinit Sureka, New DelhiSanjay Sharma, New DelhiRaja R Yadav, Allahabad

Iran

Majid Assadi, BushehrSeyedReza Najafizadeh, TehranMohammad Ali Oghabian, TehranAmir Reza Radmard, TehranRamin Sadeghi, MashhadHadi Rokni Yazdi, Tehran

Ireland

Tadhg Gleeson, WexfordFrederik JAI Vernimmen, Cork

Israel

Dafna Ben Bashat, Tel AvivAmit Gefen, Tel AvivTamar Sella, Jerusalem

ItalyAdriano Alippi, RomeDante Amelio, TrentoMichele Anzidei, Rome Filippo F Angileri, MessinasStefano Arcangeli, RomeRoberto Azzoni, San Donato milaneseTommaso V Bartolotta, PalermoTommaso Bartalena, ImolaLivia Bernardin, San BonifacioFederico Boschi, VeronaSergio Casciaro, LecceEmanuele Casciani, RomeMusa M Can, NapoliAlberto Cuocolo, NapoliMichele Ferrara, Coppito Mauro Feola, FossanoGiampiero Francica, Castel VolturnoLuigi De Gennaro, RomeGiulio Giovannetti, Pisa

Francesca Iacobellis, NapoliFormato Invernizzi, Monza BrianzaFrancesco Lassandro, NaplesLorenzo Livi, FlorencePier P Mainenti, NapoliLaura Marzetti, ChietiGiuseppe Malinverni, CrescentinoEnrica Milanesi, TurinGiovanni Morana, TrevisoLorenzo Monti, MilanSilvia D Morbelli, GenoaBarbara Palumbo, PerugiaCecilia Parazzini, MilanStefano Pergolizzi, MessinaAntonio Pinto, NaplesCamillo Porcaro, RomeCarlo C Quattrocchi, RomeAlberto Rebonato, PerugiaGiuseppe Rizzo, RomeRoberto De Rosa, NaplesDomenico Rubello, RovigoAndrea Salvati, BariSergio Sartori, FerraraLuca M Sconfienza, MilanoGiovanni Storto, RioneroNicola Sverzellati, ParmaAlberto S Tagliafico, GenovaNicola Troisi, Florence

JapanYasuhiko Hori, ChibaHidetoshi Ikeda, KoriyamaMasahito Kawabori, SapporoTamotsu Kamishima, SapporoHiro Kiyosue, YufuYasunori Minami, Osaka-sayamaYasuhiro Morimoto, KitakyushuSatoru Murata, TokyoShigeki Nagamachi, MiyazakiHiroshi Onishi, YamanashiMorio Sato, Wakayama ShiYoshito Tsushima, MaebashiMasahiro Yanagawa, Suita

Netherlands

Willem Jan van Rooij, Tilburg

New Zealand

W Howell Round, Hamilton

Pakistan

Wazir Muhammad, Abbottabad

Poland

Maciej S Baglaj, Wroclaw

II January 28, 2014WJR|www.wjgnet.com

Piotr Czauderna, Gdansk

Portugal

Joao Manuel RS Tavares, Porto

Serbia

Olivera Ciraj-Bjelac, Belgrade

Singapore

Gopinathan Anil, SingaporeTerence KB Teo, SingaporeCher Heng Tan, Singapore

Slovakia

Stefan Sivak, Martin

South Korea

Ki Seok Choo, BusanSeung Hong Choi, SeoulDae-Seob Choi, Jinju Hong-Seok Jang, SeoulYong Jeong, DaejeonChan Kyo Kim, SeoulSe Hyung Kim, SeoulJoong-Seok Kim, SeoulSang Eun Kim, SeongnamSung Joon Kwon, SeoulJeong Min Lee, SeoulIn Sook Lee, BusanNoh Park, GoyangChang Min Park, SeoulSung Bin Park, SeoulDeuk Jae Sung, SeoulChoongsoo Shin, SeoulKwon-Ha Yoon, Iksan

Spain

Miguel A De Gregorio, ZaragozaAntonio Luna, JaénEnrique Marco de Lucas, SantanderFernando Ruiz Santiago, Granada

Sweden

Dmitry Grishenkov, StockholmTie-Qiang Li, Stockholm

Switzerland

Nicolau Beckmann, BaselChristian Boy, BernGiorgio Treglia, Bellinzona

Stephan Ulmer, Kiel

Thailand

Sirianong Namwongprom, Chiang Mai

Turkey

Kubilay Aydin, IstanbulRamazan Akdemir, SakaryaSerhat Avcu, Ankara Ayse Aralasmak, IstanbulOktay Algin, AnkaraNevbahar Akcar, MeselikBilal Battal, AnkaraZulkif Bozgeyik, ElazigNazan Ciledag, AakaraFuldem Y Donmez, AnkaraGulgun Engin, IstanbulAhmet Y Goktay, IzmirOguzhan G Gumustas, BursaKaan Gunduz, AnkaraPelin Ozcan Kara, MersinKivanc Kamburoglu, AnkaraOzgur Kilickesmez, IstanbulFuruzan Numan, IstanbulCem Onal, AdanaOzgur Oztekin, IzmirSeda Ozbek (Boruban), KonyaSelda Sarikaya, ZonguldakFigen Taser, KutahyaBaran Tokar, EskisehirEnder Uysal, IstanbulEnsar Yekeler, Istanbul

United Kingdom

Indran Davagnanam, LondonM DC Valdés Hernández, EdinburghAlan Jackson, ManchesterSuneil Jain, BelfastLong R Jiao, LondonMiltiadis Krokidis, CambridgePradesh Kumar, LiverpoolPeter D Kuzmich, DerbyGeorgios Plataniotis, BrightonVanessa Sluming, Liverpool

United States

Garima Agrawal, Saint LouisJames R Brasic, BaltimoreRajendra D Badgaiyan, BuffaloUlas Bagci, BethesdaAnat Biegon, Stony Brook Ramon Casanova, Winston SalemWenli Cai, BostonZheng Chang, DurhamCorey J Chakarun, Long BeachKai Chen, Los AngelesHyun-Soon Chong, ChicagoMarco Cura, DallasRavi R Desai, BensalemDelia DeBuc, MiamiCarlo N De Cecco, Charleston

Timm-Michael L Dickfeld, BaltimoreSubba R Digumarthy, BostonHuy M Do, StanfordTodd A Faasse, Grand RapidsSalomao Faintuch, BostonGirish M Fatterpekar, New YorkDhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan, HoustonRobert J Griffin, Little RockAndrew J Gunn, BostonSandeep S Hedgire, BostonTimothy J Hoffman, ColumbiaMai-Lan Ho, San FranciscoJuebin Huang, JacksonAbid Irshad, CharlestonMatilde Inglese, New YorkEl-Sayed H Ibrahim, JacksonvillePaul R Julsrud, RochesterPamela T Johnson, BaltimoreMing-Hung Kao, TempeSunil Krishnan, HoustonRichard A Komoroski, CincinnatiSandi A Kwee, HonoluluKing Kim, Ft. LauderdaleGuozheng Liu, WorcesterYiyan Liu, NewarkVenkatesh Mani, New YorkLian-Sheng Ma, PleasantonRachna Madan, BostonZeyad A Metwalli, HoustonYilong Ma, ManhassetHui Mao, AtlantaFeroze B Mohamed, PhiladelphiaGul Moonis, BostonJohn L Nosher, New BrunswickRahmi Oklu, BostonAytekin Oto, ChicagoBishnuhari Paudyal, PhiladelphiaRajul Pandya, YoungstownChong-Xian Pan, SacramentoJay J Pillai, BaltimoreNeal Prakash, DuarteReza Rahbar, BostonAli S Raja, BostonGustavo J Rodriguez, El PasoDavid J Sahn, Portlsand Steven Schild, ScottsdaleAli R Sepahdari, Los AngelesLi Shen, IndianapolisJP Sheehan, CharlottesvilleAtul B Shinagare, BostonSarabjeet Singh, BostonCharles J Smith, ColumbiaKenji Suzuki, ChicagoMonvadi Srichai-Parsia, WashingtonSree H Tirumani, BostonHebert A Vargas, New YorkSachit Verma, PhiladelphiaYoichi Watanabe, MinneapolisLi Wang, Chapel HillCarol C Wu, BostonShoujun Xu, HoustonMin Yao, ClevelandXiaofeng Yang, AtlantaQingbao Yu, AlbuquerqueAifeng Zhang, ChicagoChao Zhou, BethlehemHongming Zhuang, Philadelphia

III January 28, 2014WJR|www.wjgnet.com

MINIREVIEWS321 Imagingofthetreatedbreastpostbreastconservationsurgery/oncoplasty:Pictorialreview

Ramani SK, Rastogi A, Mahajan A, Nair N, Shet T, Thakur MH

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Observational Study

330 Clinical-radiological-pathologicalcorrelationofcavernoussinushemangioma:Incrementalvalueofdiffusion-

weightedimaging

Mahajan A, Rao VRK, Anantaram G, Polnaya AM, Desai S, Desai P, Vadapalli R, Panigrahi M


Contents Monthly Volume 9 Number 8 August 28, 2017

� August 28, 2017|Volume 9|�ssue 8|WJR|www.wjgnet.com

Contents

NAMEOFJOURNALWorld Journal of Radiology

ISSNISSN 1949-8470 (online)

LAUNCHDATEJanuary 31, 2009

FREQUENCYMonthly

EDITORS-IN-CHIEFKai U Juergens, MD, Associate Professor, MRT und PET/CT, Nuklearmedizin Bremen Mitte, ZE-MODI - Zentrum für morphologische und moleku-lare Diagnostik, Bremen 28177, Germany

Edwin JR van Beek, MD, PhD, Professor, Clinical Research Imaging Centre and Department of Medi-cal Radiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, United Kingdom

Thomas J Vogl, MD, Professor, Reader in Health Technology Assessment, Department of Diagnos-tic and Interventional Radiology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt 60590,

FLYLEAF

EDITORS FOR THIS ISSUE

Responsible Assistant Editor: Xiang Li Responsible Science Editor: Jin-Xin KongResponsible Electronic Editor: Ya-Jing Lu Proofing Editorial Office Director: Jin-Lei WangProofing Editor-in-Chief: Lian-Sheng Ma

Germany

EDITORIALBOARDMEMBERSAll editorial board members resources online at http://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/editorialboard.htm

EDITORIALOFFICEXiu-Xia Song, DirectorWorld Journal of RadiologyBaishideng Publishing Group Inc7901 Stoneridge Drive, Suite 501, Pleasanton, CA 94588, USATelephone: +1-925-2238242Fax: +1-925-2238243E-mail: [email protected] Desk: http://www.f6publishing.com/helpdeskhttp://www.wjgnet.com

PUBLISHERBaishideng Publishing Group Inc7901 Stoneridge Drive, Suite 501, Pleasanton, CA 94588, USATelephone: +1-925-2238242Fax: +1-925-2238243E-mail: [email protected] Desk: http://www.f6publishing.com/helpdeskhttp://www.wjgnet.com

PUBLICATIONDATEAugust 28, 2017

COPYRIGHT© 2017 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. Articles published by this Open-Access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribu-tion Non-commercial License, which permits use, dis-tribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license.

SPECIALSTATEMENTAll articles published in journals owned by the Baishideng Publishing Group (BPG) represent the views and opin-ions of their authors, and not the views, opinions or policies of the BPG, except where otherwise explicitly indicated.

INSTRUCTIONSTOAUTHORShttp://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/204

ONLINESUBMISSIONhttp://www.f6publishing.com

ABOUT COVER EditorialBoardMemberofWorldJournalofRadiology ,XWCui,PhD,Profes-

sor,DepartmentofMedicalUltrasound,TongjiHospitalofTongjiMedicalCol-

lege,HuazhongUniversityofScienceandTechnology,Wuhan430030,Hubei

Province,China

World Journal of Radiology (World J Radiol, WJR, online ISSN 1949-8470, DOI: 10.4329) is a peer-reviewed open access academic journal that aims to guide clinical practice and improve diagnostic and therapeutic skills of clinicians.

WJR covers topics concerning diagnostic radiology, radiation oncology, radiologic physics, neuroradiology, nuclear radiology, pediatric radiology, vascular/interventional radiology, medical imaging achieved by various modalities and related methods analysis. The current columns of WJR include editorial, frontier, diagnostic advances, therapeutics advances, field of vision, mini-reviews, review, topic highlight, medical ethics, original articles, case report, clinical case conference (clinicopathological conference), and autobi-ography.

We encourage authors to submit their manuscripts to WJR. We will give priority to manuscripts that are supported by major national and international foundations and those that are of great basic and clinical significance.

World Journal of Radiology is now indexed in PubMed, PubMed Central, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science).

I-III EditorialBoard

AIM AND SCOPE

��

World Journal of RadiologyVolume 9 Number 8 August 28, 2017

INDEXING/ABSTRACTING

�� August 28, 2017|Volume 9|�ssue 8|WJR|www.wjgnet.com

Subhash K Ramani, Ashita Rastogi, Abhishek Mahajan, Nita Nair, Tanuja Shet, Meenakshi H Thakur

MINIREVIEWS

321 August 28, 2017|Volume 9|Issue 8|WJR|www.wjgnet.com

Imaging of the treated breast post breast conservation surgery/oncoplasty: Pictorial review

Subhash K Ramani, Department of Radiodiagnosis, JJ Hospital, Mumbai 400008, India

Subhash K Ramani, Ashita Rastogi, Abhishek Mahajan, Meenakshi H Thakur, Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai 400012, India

Nita Nair, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai 400012, India

Tanuja Shet, Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai 400012, India

Author contributions: All authors are the guarantors of integrity of entire study; Ramani SK designed the study; Ramani SK, Rastogi A, Mahajan A and Thakur MH performed data analysis/interpretation; Ramani SK and Rastogi A performed the literature research; all authors contributed to manuscript drafting or manuscript revision for important intellectual content; all authors gave manuscript final version approval and manuscript editing; all authors take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Conflict-of-interest statement: This manuscript is not published anywhere else; all authors conform that there is no conflict of interests (including none for related to commercial, personal, political, intellectual, or religious interests).

Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Manuscript source: Invited manuscript

Correspondence to: Dr. Ashita Rastogi, DNB, Radiodiagnosis, Fellowship Cancer Imaging, Assistant Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Tata Memorial Centre, Room No. 117, Dr E Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai 400012, India. [email protected]

Telephone: +91-99-69492798Fax: +91-22-24146937

Received: January 20, 2017Peer-review started: January 20, 2017First decision: March 27, 2017Revised: May 1, 2017Accepted: May 12, 2017Article in press: May 15, 2017Published online: August 28, 2017

AbstractMammographic appearance of the normal breast is altered in the post-operative setting. It is essential to be aware of the normal findings as well as to identify features of recurrent disease with particular emphasis on radiological-pathological concordance. Digital breast tomosynthesis and volumetric breast density add incremental value in this clinical setting. We present a pictorial review of various cases to illustrate normal post-operative findings as well as mammographic features suspicious for recurrent disease.

Key words: Mammography; Digital breast tomosynthesis; Breast conservation surgery; Post breast-conserving therapy imaging; Breast cancer

© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Core tip: Mammographic imaging in patients after breast conservation surgery is challenging because surgery alters the normal breast architecture. The distinction of normal post-operative changes from true findings of recurrence becomes demanding even for a breast imager making it essential to update our knowledge in the subject. In the recent times digital breast tomosynthesis and volumetric breast density are adding an incremental value in this clinical setting.


Submit a Manuscript: http://www.f6publishing.com

DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v9.i8.321

World J Radiol 2017 August 28; 9(8): 321-329



Ramani SK et al . Mammographic Imaging of the operated breast

Ramani SK, Rastogi A, Mahajan A, Nair N, Shet T, Thakur MH. Imaging of the treated breast post breast conservation surgery/oncoplasty: Pictorial review. World J Radiol 2017; 9(8): 321-329 Available from: URL: http://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v9/i8/321.htm DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v9.i8.321

INTRODUCTIONBreast conservation surgery (BCS) is the most commonly employed management of breast cancer in current practice and aims at surgical excision of the tumor while conserving the patient’s breast appearance and form. Breast radiologists need to update their knowledge of typical and atypical appearances of the treated breast in order to detect abnormalities signifying recurrence as well as to not raise unnecessary concern over benign course of postoperative change.

The expected changes on mammography after breast conservative surgery include skin thickening or edema, parenchymal edema, postoperative fluid collection, scar, fat necrosis and dystrophic calcifications which are more marked up to six months after therapy. Recurrence on mammographic imaging may be observed as a mass or microcalcifications, increase in skin thickening, increase in breast density, scar enlargement, axillary nodal recurrence or Paget’s disease. We present various mammography images to illustrate findings which may be left alone and those which require further intervention.

LEAVE-ME-ALONE FEATURESSkin thickening and parenchymal edemaNormal skin thickness of the breast as seen on mammogram is 2 mm[1,2]. Skin thickening (more than 2 mm) is the most common finding after breastconserving therapy (BCT), reported in up to 90% of patients[3]. On imaging it manifests as skin and trabecular thickening or overall increased breast density due to parenchymal edema which decrease on follow up studies and return to normal by 2 to 3 years (Figure 1)[2]. Post radiation edema occurs more commonly after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) than intraoperative radiotherapy[4,5]. Less commonly the skin thickening and parenchymal edema may be a consequence of lymphedema (secondary to axillary node dissection) or mastitis[3].

Post-operative collectionFluid with or without blood which collects in the postoperative cavity appears as an oval or round circumscribed mass on mammography. When viewed on ultrasound, a mixed echogenic collection with variable fluid (anechoic) and haemorrhagic (echogenic) contents is observed. Postoperative fluid collections are seen in about half the patients at 1 mo after surgery and may remain in up to a fourth of cases till 6 mo[2] though in a few patients these may persist for years[6]. On sequential

mammograms, the lesion becomes smaller, irregular and denser as the seroma retracts and is replaced by fibrous tissue (Figure 2). However an increase in size on followup merits further evaluation to exclude a recurrent mass.

Post-surgical scarA postsurgical scar appears as an area of architectural distortion contiguous with contour deformity of surgery. In comparison to a true recurrence which appears same on all mammographic views and has a dense centre; on different projections a scar has varied appearances (appearing less distorted on one) and demonstrates

Figure 1 Patient underwent lumpectomy followed by radiation therapy. A-C: (A) Diffuse increase in skin thickness is seen in first post therapy mammogram which decreased on subsequent mammograms at two (B) and five (C) years respectively.

Feb 2008 Aug 2010 Feb 2013

A B C

Figure 2 Two different patients post breast conservation. A and B demonstrate retraction of scar in right breast on follow up while C and D reveal serial decrease in size of a post-operative collection (seroma) in left breast.

A B

C D

2008 2010

2009 2010

2.6 cm1.9 cm

2.7 cm

4.9 cm

1

11

1


fat lucencies within[3]. These features may be better imaged on spot compression or magnification views. As with a seroma, the scar usually decreases in density and/or size on serial imaging (Figure 3) or remains stable while an increase in size or density is suspicious for recurrence (Figure 4).

Dystrophic calcifications and fat necrosisBenign calcifications are seen on mammography in about a third of treated breasts beginning 2 to 3 years after completion of therapy due to a combination of surgical trauma and radiation. Morphologically these calcifications are large (> 5 mm) and irregular in outline with central lucencies, with no associated mass/density

and always occur at the site of surgery[7].Fat necrosis is tissue necrosis resulting from damage

to the intima of arteries from surgery and radiation. It more commonly manifests as an oval or round lucency with curvilinear or arclike peripheral calcifications which are characteristic for the same (Figure 5). It is a common complication of myocutaneous flaps usually seen after 612 mo of treatment[3] and may clinically present as a palpable mass that is firm or hard[8]. When it presents as a palpable lesion with atypical appearance on mammography, sonography followed by biopsy may become requisite to confirm the diagnosis (Figure 6)[9].

A B C DFigure 3 The scar usually decreases in density and/or size on serial imaging. A and B demonstrate a post-surgical scar in left breast which is contiguous with the skin contour deformity. Fat lucency (black dashed arrow) within the scar is seen on the MLO view in (B); C and D show the post-surgery scar (white arrow) on CC and MLO views having different morphology respectively; it opens up on CC view (C).

Jan 2007 Oct 2010 Feb 2011A B CFigure 4 In a patient post breast-conserving therapy, scar (double headed arrow) is seen to increase in size at three (B) and four (C) years as compared to the initial mammogram shown in (A) which suggests recurrence.

A B

Figure 5 Calcifications associated with fat necrosis demonstrate a typical curvilinear or arc-like (arrows) morphology (A and B).

BA 2014 2015

Figure 6 (A) Post breast-conserving therapy scar is seen in the right breast which appears to have increased in size on follow up mammogram after one year seen in (B). However fat lucencies are still seen within the lesion (which was better appreciated on tomography images). Patient underwent biopsy because of clinical suspicion of recurrence.



WORRISOME MAMMOGRAPHY FINDINGS, I.E., "RED FLAGS"Recurrences may present at clinical examination or, may be detected only on mammography (Figure 7) as suspicious microcalcifications or masses. The rate of local recurrence after breast cancer surgery is 1%2% per year[10]. Stability is defined as no interval change on two successive mammographic studies[7] and is generally observed at around 23 years after the completion of radiation therapy. Any retrograde change in imaging findings such as a new mass, microcalcifications, architectural distortion or an area of increased density at the scar site post stability should raise suspicion for tumor recurrence. Figure 8 lists the sites of recurrences to be looked for in conservatively

treated breast on follow up.

MassesPalpable recurrences usually manifest as masses and even when seen as microcalcifications on a mammogram, they have associated densities. The temporal changes from prior mammogram determine the approach to patients[11]. Recurrences may be perceived as an increasing asymmetry or an enlarging mass within the operative bed or a new mass (neodensity) away from operative site[10] (Figure 9). Any neodensity at mammography should be evaluated on ultrasound to determine whether it is solid or cystic (Figure 10), and solid lesions should be biopsied (Figure 11).

Up to 65% of early recurrences occur at or within a few centimetres of the site of original tumor, usually

Detection of recurrence

Mammography 35% Physical exam 39% Both 26%

Figure 7 How are recurrences detected on follow up.

Ipsilateral breast

Contralateral breast

Lymph nodes (ipsilateral and contralateral)

Parenchyma (neodensity/developing asymmetry/mass/microcalcifications)

Surgical scar (stable or not/flap-native tissue junction)

Skin (skin thickening/nipple calicification-Paget's disease)

Chest wall

On a follow up mammogram

Figure 8 Sites for recurrent lesions.

2007 2009 2010 2008 2012 2014A B C D E F

Figure 9 Two patients post breast-conserving therapy with recurrent masses. A-C show a recurrent mass (dashed arrow in C) appearing at the scar site (solid arrow in A and B) two years after surgery; D-F demonstrate a post-surgical scar in the lower aspect (arrow in D and E) and a recurrent mass (dashed arrow in F) in upper aspect - different quadrant than the primary.



within 67 years of treatment[1]. At follow up imaging, it is essential to ensure that scar site is visible in two views (CC and MLO or additional views), at least in the first decade after surgery[6]. A new lesion or a neodensity which is suspicious may remain stable due to ongoing hormonal treatment, and stability does not indicate benign finding. Morphology is the most important criteria, and it is necessary to achieve a radiologicalpathological concordance (Figure 12). Recurrence in the form of a developing asymmetry (Figure 13) has a 27% likelihood of cancer post BCT[12]. Postoncoplastic or breast reconstruction, locoregional tumor recurrence is seen in 2.3%. The most common site of tumor recurrence is the contact line, at the junction of the flap with the native tissue[13] (Figure 14).

MicrocalcificationsMicrocalcifications that are casting, fine linear or

linear branching and not typical of fat necrosis are suspicious. They are frequently similar in morphology to the primary cancer[7] (Figure 15). In an area of fat necrosis, fat like lucency is noted around or within the calcific densities, while in calcifications associated with recurrence, an associated mass density is seen in the region (Figure 16).

Skin thickeningProgression of breast edema or skin thickening after the first post-surgical, post radiation therapy mammogram is abnormal and should be investigated[14]. Increasing skin thickening is better appreciated on digital mammography as compared to screen film mammography.

Radiation induced sarcoma is a rare complication

Neodensity (new mass on mammography)

Suspicious (even with well circumscribed margins)

USG: Rule out cyst

Biopsy should be performed. Radiological-pathological concordance must

Figure 10 Approach to a neodensity.

Oct 2012

2014

A B

C

Figure 11 Patient with a left breast mass (arrow), who underwent breast-conserving therapy (A), (B) follow up mammogram at 2 years revealed a neodensity (dashed arrow) which on ultrasound (C) was found to be a cyst.

Jan 2012 Aug 2013

Dec 2008 May 2011A B

C D

E

Figure 12 Morphology is the most important criteria, and it is necessary to achieve a radiological-pathological concordance. A-C: Patient underwent breast-conserving therapy for left breast carcinoma and on follow up imaging was found to have a developing asymmetry (circle in A) progressing to a mass (arrows in B and C). Biopsy and histopathology showed no evidence of malignancy however there was radiological and pathological discordance; D and E: Patient presented a year later with a large necrotic FDG-avid mass in the left breast. FDG: Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose.



which manifests as thickening of the skin or prominent trabecular pattern[15]. Angiosarcoma presents as a painless mass that may be associated with overlying blue or purplish discoloration of the skin (Figure 17).

Paget’s disease: Incidence of Paget’s disease in ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences ranges from 3.1% to 10.6%. Paget’s disease following BCT or subcutaneous mastectomy and reconstruction in patients presenting with nipple changes is not uncommon and should prompt early biopsy of what could be considered postRT nipple changes[16]. Microcalcifications in the nipple-areola region may be seen on the mammogram (Figure 18).

Axillary recurrenceAxillary nodal recurrence is relatively rare after adequate nodal dissection (of level Ⅰ and Ⅱ) has been done, occurring in 1%3% of women[17]. Patients who present with axillary recurrence have metastatic disease at other sites in about fifty percent. On mammogram enlarged nodes may be seen (Figure 19).

ROLE OF DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS AND VOLUMETRIC BREAST DENSITYDigital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) as a technique entails imaging of the breast tissue in multiple sections (at varied angles) instead of a twodimensional image as with conventional mammography. The overlap of parenchymal tissues is resolved thus reducing the false positives as well as adequately identifying true lesions thus increasing the sensitivity of a mammogram. DBT not only helps in triangulation of a lesion but also reduces the requirement for additional views and lowers the patient callback rate. Studies related to digital breast tomosynthesis to date have primarily focussed on screening with fewer reports on its utility in diagnostic mammography. Most studies have concluded a definite advantage of DBT in dense breasts (i.e., patients who have types 3 and 4 breast parenchymal

A B C2007 Oct 2009 Apr 2010 Feb 2011C

Figure 13 Patient with a right breast mass (arrow in A) who underwent breast-conserving therapy shows a normal post therapy mammogram at two years (B) with a post-surgical scar (dashed arrow), follow up imaging demonstrates a developing asymmetry in the retro-areolar region at three (C) years post therapy which subsequently developed into a frank mass (D).

A B CJun 2011 Jun 2013 Jul 2014

Dec 2014D E

F

G

Figure 14 The most common site of tumor recurrence is the contact line, at the junction of the flap with the native tissue. A-C: Patient post right lumpectomy (A) underwent subcutaneous mastectomy with LD flap (dashed arrows in B and C); D-F: At three year follow up patient presented with a skin nodule which was seen as an asymmetric density at the junction of flap with native breast tissue (arrows in D and E) and an increase in volumetric density of right breast (F); FDG-PET study (G) showed that the nodule was FDG avid. Histology - IDC grade 3. FDG-PET: Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose-positron emission tomography.


Per subject Per breast Per image

29-12-2014

R L R L

02-07-2014

Quantra

143

734

19

125

580

111

768

14

108

529

20

Vfg (cm3)

Vb (cm3)

Vbd (%)


Figure 15 Microcalcifications. A, B: Patient presented with a right breast mass with microcalcifications (arrow in B) and underwent right breast-conserving therapy with latissimus dorsi flap; C, D: At two years post treatment casting microcalcifications developed similar to the index lesion, better appreciated on magnified view (arrows in D) are seen around the scar site; E: Breast MRI revealed non-mass enhancement (dashed arrow) in the right breast. Histopathology of the recurrence showed DCIS. MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging.

A

B

C D

E

Jan 2008 Nov 2010

A B C

Figure 16 In dystrophic or benign calcifications, fat lucency (circle) is present within as seen in (A) while in calcifications associated with recurrence (arrows), the centre appears dense (circle) as shown in (B), (C) subtracted post contrast MRI image of the patient in (B) shows a seroma cavity (solid arrow) with an enhancing solid component (dashed arrow) in the periphery anteriorly.

A Mar 2007 B Jun 2008 C Feb 2009 D

E

Figure 17 (A) In a post breast-conserving therapy patient, the skin thickness increases at one-year (B) and two-year (C) follow up mammograms; (D) dynamic MR perfusion reveals increased perfusion along the skin of the right breast and an enhancing focus, on ultrasound (E) an oval hypoechoic mass with increased vascularity is seen in the retroareolar region corresponding to the enhancing focus on breast MRI. Histopathology: Angiosarcoma. MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging.



density) in terms of lesion characterisation[18].Similar to screening mammography, DBT also helps

resolve post conservation changes such as a scar or other asymmetric densities due to parenchymal edema from a true recurrence[19]. A recent study by Sia et al[20] also reported that DBT decreases the rate of indeterminate findings in surveillance imaging of conservatively treated breasts. The fat density within the scar and that associated with benign calcification is better appreciated on DBT (Figure 20) whereas a true recurrence would demonstrate a mass. Increase in the volumetric breast density (Vbd) allows for a quantitative assessment for recurrences particularly where the presentation is without a definite mass (Figure 21).

CONCLUSIONTo conclude, mammographic appearance of the breast is altered in the postoperative setting and breast radiologists should be cognisant of features suggestive

of recurrent disease to identify it early. It is just as essential to be aware of the normal evolution of post therapy changes to avoid unnecessary further workup and stress to the patient. DBT and Vbd add incremental value in characterising normal and abnormal findings in this clinical setting. Not many studies have assessed the value of DBT over digital mammography with scope for research in this area in future.

REFERENCES1 Mendelson EB. Evaluation of the postoperative breast. Radiol Clin

North Am 1992; 30: 107-138 [PMID: 1732922]2 Krishnamurthy R, Whitman GJ, Stelling CB, Kushwaha

AC. Mammographic findings after breast conservation therapy. Radiographics 1999; 19 Spec No: S53-S62; quiz S262-S263 [PMID: 10517443 DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.19.suppl_1.g99oc16s53]

3 Chansakul T, Lai KC, Slanetz PJ. The postconservation breast: part 1, Expected imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198: 321-330 [PMID: 22268174 DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.7298]

4 Rivera R, Smith-Bronstein V, Villegas-Mendez S, Rayhanabad J, Sheth P, Rashtian A, Holmes DR. Mammographic findings after intraoperative radiotherapy of the breast. Radiol Res Pract 2012; 2012: 758371 [PMID: 22550585 DOI: 10.1155/2012/758371]

5 Elsberger B, Romsauerova A, Vinnicombe S, Whelehan P, Brown DC, Dewar JA, Thompson AM, Evans A. Comparison of mammographic findings after intraoperative radiotherapy or external beam whole breast radiotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014; 40: 163-167 [PMID: 24332581 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.11.011]

6 Dershaw DD. Breast imaging and the conservative treatment of breast

Figure 18 Microcalcifications in the nipple-areola region may be seen on the mammogram. A: Three year post breast-conserving therapy mammogram - normal. Patient presented with unilateral yellowish nipple discharge and no clinically palpable abnormality at five year follow up. MMG revealed microcalcification (arrows in C) in the nipple-areola region. Histopathology: Paget’s disease of nipple; B: On retrospective evaluation, a tiny speck of calcification is seen in the nipple-areola region.

Figure 19 Patient underwent right skin sparing mastectomy with Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap (dashed arrows in A) and axillary and apical clearance, one year later she presented with right axillary nodes (arrow) on mammogram (A) which were FDG-avid on PET (B).

Figure 20 (A) and (B) represent conventional or 2D mammographic (A) and digital breast tomosynthesis (B) views of the scar site recurrence wherein mass density within the lesion is better appreciated on digital breast tomosynthesis (arrow); (C) and (D) show appearance of a scar on conventional or 2D mammogram (C) and digital breast tomosynthesis (D) where the fat lucency at the scar site is confirmed (arrow) on digital breast tomosynthesis.

Jun 2010 Dec 2011 Sep 2013

A B C

BA

A B

C D



cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 2002; 40: 501-516 [PMID: 12117189]7 Gutierrez R, Horst KC, Dirbas FM, Ikeda DM. Breast imaging

following breast conservation therapy. In: Dirbas FM and Scott-Conner CEH. Breast surgical techniques and interdisciplinary management. New York: Springer Science Business Media, 2011: 975-995

8 Hogge JP, Zuurbier RA, de Paredes ES. Mammography of autologous myocutaneous flaps. Radiographics 1999; 19 Spec No: S63-S72 [PMID: 10517444 DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.19.suppl_1.g99oc12s63]

9 Hedegard W, Niell B, Specht M, Winograd J, Rafferty E. Breast reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: imaging appearances of the normal flap and common complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200: W75-W84 [PMID: 23255774 DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.9270]

10 Chansakul T, Lai KC, Slanetz PJ. The postconservation breast: part 2, Imaging findings of tumor recurrence and other long-term sequelae. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198: 331-343 [PMID: 22268175 DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.6881]

11 Hadjiiski L, Sahiner B, Chan HP, Petrick N, Helvie MA, Gurcan M. Analysis of temporal changes of mammographic features: computer-aided classification of malignant and benign breast masses. Med Phys 2001; 28: 2309-2317 [PMID: 11764038 DOI: 10.1118/1.1412242]

12 Leung JW, Sickles EA. Developing asymmetry identified on mammography: correlation with imaging outcome and pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: 667-675 [PMID: 17312052 DOI: 10.2214/AJR.06.0413]

13 Farras Roca JA, Dao TH, Lantieri L, Lepage C, Bosc R, Meyblum E, Pigneur F, Beaussart P, Assaf E, Totobenazara JL, Calitchi E, Belkacemi Y, Rahmouni A, Luciani A. Ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence after Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction: Incidence and radiological presentation. Diagn

Interv Imaging 2016; 97: 203-209 [PMID: 26282051 DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2015.06.021]

14 Gage I, Schnitt SJ, Recht A, Abner A, Come S, Shulman LN, Monson JM, Silver B, Harris JR, Connolly JL. Skin recurrences after breast-conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 480-486 [PMID: 9469331 DOI: 10.1200/jco.1998.16.2.480]

15 Yi A, Kim HH, Shin HJ, Huh MO, Ahn SD, Seo BK. Radiation-induced complications after breast cancer radiation therapy: a pictorial review of multimodality imaging findings. Korean J Radiol 2009; 10: 496-507 [PMID: 19721835 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2009.10.5.496]

16 Plastaras JP, Harris EE, Solin LJ. Paget’s disease of the nipple as local recurrence after breast-conservation treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2005; 6: 349-353 [PMID: 16277886 DOI: 10.3816/CBC.2005.n.039]

17 Clemons M, Danson S, Hamilton T, Goss P. Locoregionally recurrent breast cancer: incidence, risk factors and survival. Cancer Treat Rev 2001; 27: 67-82 [PMID: 11319846 DOI: 10.1053/ctrv.2000.0204]

18 Margolies L, Cohen A, Sonnenblick E, Mandeli J, Schmidt PH, Szabo J, Patel N, Hermann G, Weltz C, Port E. Digital breast tomosynthesis changes management in patients seen at a tertiary care breast center. ISRN Radiol 2014; 2014: 658929 [PMID: 24967297 DOI: 10.1155/2014/658929]

19 Curran J. How effective is mammography in detecting breast cancer recurrence in women after Breast Conservation Therapy (BCT) - A systematic literature review. Radiography 2016; 22: 252-256 [DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2016.02.001]

20 Sia J, Moodie K, Bressel M, Lau E, Gyorki D, Skandarajah A, Chua B. A prospective study comparing digital breast tomosynthesis with digital mammography in surveillance after breast cancer treatment. Eur J Cancer 2016; 61: 122-127 [PMID: 27163158 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.04.007]

P- Reviewer: Langdon S, Medina-Franco H, Olsha O S- Editor: Song XX L- Editor: A E- Editor: Lu YJ

Figure 21 Patient underwent left breast-conserving therapy. On follow-up mammograms at five (A) and six (B) years a subtle increase in density is noted. On volumetric assessment (C and D), the left breast density increased from 6 to 17; E and F: Ultrasound and color Doppler revealed a heterogeneously hypoechoic mass in left upper outer quadrant with peripheral vascularity. Histology: IDC.

A B C

D

E F


Abhishek Mahajan, Vedula Rajni Kanth Rao, Gudipati Anantaram, Ashwin M Polnaya, Sandeep Desai, Paresh Desai, Rammohan Vadapalli, Manas Panigrahi

ORIGINAL ARTICLE


Clinical-radiological-pathological correlation of cavernous sinus hemangioma: Incremental value of diffusion-weighted imaging

Abhishek Mahajan, Ashwin M Polnaya, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai 400012, India

Vedula Rajni Kanth Rao, Gudipati Anantaram, Department of Radiology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Secunderabad 500003, India

Sandeep Desai, Department of Radiodiagnosis Clumax Imaging, Bangalore 560011, India

Paresh Desai, Department of Radiology, Apollo Victor Hospital, Goa 403601, India

Rammohan Vadapalli, Department of Radiology, Vijaya Diagnostics, Hyderabad, Secunderabad 500003, India

Manas Panigrahi, Department of Neurosurgery, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Secunderabad 500003, India

Author contributions: Guarantors of integrity of entire study by all authors; study concepts/study design or data acquisition or data analysis/interpretation by all authors; manuscript drafting or manuscript revision for important intellectual content by all authors; manuscript final version approval by all authors; literature research by all authors; manuscript editing by all authors; all authors take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Institutional review board statement: The study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional review board.

Informed consent statement: Participants gave informed consent for data sharing.

Conflict-of-interest statement: I confirm that this manuscript is not published anywhere else and on behalf of all authors, I state that there is no conflict of interests (including none for related to commercial, personal, political, intellectual, or religious interests).

Data sharing statement: All the cases presented in this article belong to the authors and have not been copied or borrowed from any published material. Technical appendix, statistics, and dataset available from the corresponding author Dr V R K Rao ([email protected]). The authors whose names are listed above certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The authors certify that a manuscript on the same or similar material has not already been published or has not been or will not be submitted to another journal or by colleagues at their institution before their work appears in your journal.

Open-Access: This article is an openaccess article which was selected by an inhouse editor and fully peerreviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BYNC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work noncommercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is noncommercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/4.0/

Manuscript source: Invited manuscript

Correspondence to: Vedula Rajni Kanth Rao, MD, DMRD, Department of Radiology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Minister Road, Secunderabad 500003, India. [email protected]: +919989773473Fax: +914027840980

Received: February 21, 2017Peer-review started: February 26, 2017First decision: March 27, 2017Revised: May 8, 2017Accepted: May 22, 2017Article in press: May 24, 2017Published online: August 28, 2017


Submit a Manuscript: http://www.f6publishing.com

DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v9.i8.330

World J Radiol 2017 August 28; 9(8): 330-338


Observational Study


Mahajan A et al . MR imaging of cavernous sinus hemangioma

AbstractAIMTo elucidate the clinical, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), pathological features of these lesions and asses the incremental value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in diagnosing them.

METHODSFifteen consecutive patients (11 females and 4 males; mean age 40.93 years; age range 13-63 years) with cavernous sinus hemangiomas (CSH) who underwent examination between November 2008 and May 2016 were included for the analysis. MRI, clinical and surgical findings of each patient was retrospectively reviewed. DWI were also analysed and mean-apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value was calculated. Eleven patients underwent surgical removal of the lesion and 2 patients had biopsy only. Diagnosis of CSH was confirmed histologically in 13 patients.

RESULTSEleven patients (73%) presented with headaches and 10 (66%) had cranial nerve involvement. Extra cavernous sinus extension was noted in 14 (94%). Surgery was performed in 13 (87%) and post-operative radiation was given to 4 (28%) patients. Thirteen patients remained asymptomatic on follow up. Three conspicuous imaging features were highly suggestive of the diagnosis: Lack of diffusion restriction (100%), homogeneous hyperintensity on T2 weighted image sequences (93.3%) and intense post-contrast enhancement (100%). The mean ADC was 1.82 × 10-3 ± 0.2186 cm2/s.

CONCLUSIONT1-weighted hypointensity with homogeneous hyper-intensity on T2-weighted sequences, intense enhancement and absence of hemosiderin within the lesion on GRE sequence favour the diagnosis. Facilitated diffusion on DWI differentiates CSH from other solid cavernous sinus lesions and significantly improves the diagnostic accuracy, a critical factor for planning surgery.

Key words: Cavernous sinus hemangioma; Cavernous sinus; Magnetic resonance imaging; Diffusion weighted imaging

© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Core tip: Cavernous hemangioma in the cavernous sinus are rare lesions with significant female preponderance. This article highlights the diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging features of cavernous sinus hemangiomas (CSH). T1-weighted hypointensity with homogeneous hyperintensity on T2-weighted sequence, absence of hemosiderin within the lesion on GRE sequence and intense post contrast enhancement favour the diagnosis. On diffusion-weighted imaging CSH shows facilitated diffusion and is nearly 100% specific for CSH. Markedly hypointense hemangioma on T1 weighted images

suggests schirrous nature of the lesion and is amenable to complete surgical excision.

Mahajan A, Rao VRK, Anantaram G, Polnaya AM, Desai S, Desai P, Vadapalli R, Panigrahi M. Clinicalradiologicalpathological correlation of cavernous sinus hemangioma: Incremental value of diffusionweighted imaging. World J Radiol 2017; 9(8): 330338 Available from: URL: http://www.wjgnet.com/19498470/full/v9/i8/330.htm DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v9.i8.330

INTRODUCTIONCavernous hemangioma in the cavernous sinus has an estimated prevalence of 1% incidence with significant female preponderance, considered to be due to hormonal influence[1,2]. The lesion is rare in occurrence closely mimicking commonly encountered cavernous sinus lesions such as schwannoma, meningioma, chordoma, granuloma, carotid aneurysm and lymphoproliferative conditions[3,4]. Microscopically cavernous sinus hemangioma (CSH) consists of multiple vascular channels lined by a single layer of endothelium without muscular layer and any intervening neural tissue[2]. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the imaging modality of choice for evaluating cavernous sinus lesions. On MR imaging, CSH shows hypointense signal on T1 weighted images (T1W) and hyperintense signal on T2 weighted images (T2W) that is indistinguishable from the other lesions which have high cellular matrix and/or necrotic components[3,4]. T2 prolongation resulting in extremely high signal intensity has been considered a definite sign of a cavernous hemangioma[4,5]. Hence, even at MRI, the diagnosis of a cavernous hemangioma can still be in doubt, with the main differential diagnosis being a schwannoma of the V nerve or meningioma[3,6]. The study aimed to elucidate the clinical, MRI, pathological features of these lesions and asses the incremental value of diffusionweighted imaging (DWI) in diagnosing them.

MATERIALS AND METHODSThis retrospective interpretation of data was approved by the hospital internal review board and informed consent was waived. A total of 15 consecutive patients with CSH who underwent MRI examination between December 2008 and May 2016 were included for the analysis. MRI, clinical, and surgical findings of each patient were retrospectively reviewed. Imaging was performed on both 1.5T and 3T systems (HDxt GE, Siemens Medical, Philips Ingenia) using 8 channel high resolution dedicated brain coil. The imaging protocol included spinecho T1W, fast spinecho T2W, fluidattenuated inversion recovery imaging (FLAIR) and contrastenhanced spinecho T1W was performed following gadolinium injection. Fast Imaging Employing


Steadystate Acquisition (FIESTA) and susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) were added to the routine sequences in two patients. Diffusion weighted imaging was performed in ten patients and GRE imaging in seven. MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were performed in four and two patients respectively.

Imaging parameters used for various sequences were as follows: (1) repetition time (TR) ms/echo time (TE) msec, 375/11; flip angle, 90°; and matrix, 296 × 205 for spinecho T1W; (w) 3000/90; flip angle, 90°; and matrix, 492 × 479 for fast spin echo T2W; and (3) 10000/125; 90°; and matrix, 300 × 205 for fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging. The other parameters were as follows: 5mm section thickness with a 1.52.2 mm intersection gap and 230 mm × 250 mm field of view. Echoplanar DW MR imaging [2921/82.4 (b = 0 and 1000 s/mm2)]; 24 sections; bandwidth, 2501 Hz per voxel; section thickness, 4 mm; intersection gap, 1.52.5 mm; field of view, 230 mm × 230 mm; matrix, 120 × 90; three signals acquired; voxel resolution, 2.05 mm × 2.53 mm × 4 mm) was performed in the axial plane before contrast material injection.

Diffusion weighted imaging was performed in 10 patients [apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values

of 5 cases were listed in Table 1]. DW images were acquired at b value = 1000 mm2/s in three orthogonal directions and combined into a trace image. DW images were visually inspected and classified as hyperintense, isointense and hypointense as compared with normal white matter. The mean ADC values (103 cm2/s) were calculated on a voxelbyvoxel basis with the software incorporated into the MR imaging unit. Manual ROIs were placed using T2 weighted and contrast enhanced images as the guide.

A fatsuppression pulse was added to the axial T1 weighted sequences following contrast enhancement. The intravenous manual bolus dose of gadolinium based contrast medium given at 0.2 mL/kg (0.1 mmol/kg) body weight. T1weighted 3D spinecho sequences without fat suppression were performed with identical imaging parameters after contrast agent administration. Post contrast Spoiled Gradient Echo (SPGR) sequences were obtained using repetition time /echo time 5/10 ms; flip angle, 80; matrix, 492 × 479; slice thickness, 1 mm; slice interval, 0 and FOV, 240 × 240.

MRI images were reviewed by three neuroradiologists (R.K., R.M., AM.) by consensus agreements. Signal intensities in T1W, T2FSE and FLAIR were tabulated as hyper, hypo, isointensities. GRE and DWI sequences were assessed for blooming and restriction of dif

Table 1 Signal intensities and other features on conventional and special magnetic resonance imaging sequences

Case No. T1W T2W T2 FLAIR Post-contrast Flow voids Extension beyond cavernous sinus

Vessel encasement

DWI Blooming on GRE

1 Hypo Hyper Hyper Intense enhancement

Yes Moderate Yes Hypointense No


No Moderate Yes Hypointense No


No Moderate Yes Hypointense No


No Extensive Yes Not done No


No Extensive Displaced only

Hypointense Not done


No Nil Displaced only

Not done Not done


Yes Mild Yes Hypointense No


Centripetal filling

Moderate Yes Hypointense -

9 Iso intense Mildly hyper Not done Intense enhancement

No Moderate Yes Hypointense Not done

10 Hypo Hyper Not done Intense enhancement

No Mild Yes Not done Not done

11 Hypo Hyper Hyper Not available No Moderate No Not done Not done12 Hypo Hyper Hyper Intense

enhancement Vascular

supply from left ICA

Extensive Yes Hypointense No


No Mild Yes Hypointense No


No Extensive Yes Hypointense Not done


Yes Extensive Yes Not done Not done

T1-W: T1 weighted image; T2-W: T2 weighted image; FLAIR: Fluid attenuated inversion recovery; DWI: Diffusion-weighted imaging; GRE: Gradient recalled echo.



fusion. Degree of enhancement was noted from the contrast enhanced T1Fat Suppressed sequences. The medical case files were reviewed retrospectively. The demography is detailed in Table 2. The age at presentation ranged from 13 to 63 years with a mean of 40.93 ± 13.82 years. There were 11 female and 4 male patients with a female preponderance. The mean age of female cohort was 42.27 ± 11.064 years. Diagnosis of cavernous hemangioma in the cavernous sinus was verified from the surgical and pathology notes. Eleven patients underwent surgical removal of the lesion and 2 patients had biopsy only. Diagnosis of CSH was confirmed histologically in 13 patients.

RESULTSHeadache was the constant feature and 7 patients had no visual symptoms despite large size of the lesion (Table 2). Papilledema was observed in one patient only. One patient had painful ophthalmoplegia in spite of a small subcentimeter lesion occupying the small posterior segment of the cavernous sinus. Preoperative MR imaging features are summarised in Table 3. Fourteen of the 15 patients showed well defined hypointense lesions occupying the cavernous sinus on T1W imaging and all of these lesions showed homogeneous hyperintensity in T2W and FLAIR imaging sequences (Figure 1). Significant extension beyond cavernous sinus into the Meckel’s cave, prepontine cistern and impression onto the peduncle was seen in 14 of 15 patients and correlated with the presenting complaints.

In the ten patients who had DW imaging, hypointense signal on DWI images was a consistent finding suggestive of facilitated diffusion (Table 3, Figure 2). The ADC maps in these lesions were hyperintense in comparison with contralateral brain parenchyma and the mean ADC value (5 patients) was 1.82 × 103 ± 0.2186 cm2/s. GRE images in seven patients did not show any blooming (Figure 3). Intense enhancement of the lesion was noted in all patients (14 of 14). Centripetal

Table 2 Mean apparent diffusion coefficient values in 5 patients

Case number mean ADC (10-3 cm2/s)

Case 1 1.98 ± 0.227Case 2 1.67 ± 0.19Case 3 1.184 ± 0.127Case 7 2.774 ± 0.299Case 9 1.54 ± 0.287Mean 1.8296 ± 0.2038

ADC: Apparent diffusion coefficient.

Figure 1 T1 weighted image, T2 weighted image and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging images. A: Axial MRI image shows well defined lobulated hypointense mass on T1-W sequence image in the right cavernous sinus; B: Homogeneous hyperintensity of the mass is noted in the T2-W axial image; C: T2-W FLAIR axial image demonstrates marked hyperintense signal of the lesion; D: MRA reveals laterally stretched and displaced cavernous carotid segment. T1-W: T1 weighted image; T2-W: T2 weighted image; FLAIR: Fluid attenuated inversion recovery; MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging; MRA: Magnetic resonance angiography.

A B

C D

A

B C

Figure 2 T2 weighted image coronal, diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient map images. A: T2-W coronal image demonstrates multiple flow voids within the CSH in the right cavernous sinus; B: DWI image shows hypointense signal on diffusion-weighted map (B) and corresponding hyperintensity on ADC maps (C) suggestive of facilitated diffusion. T2-W: T2 weighted image; CSH: Cavernous sinus hemangioma; DWI: Diffusion-weighted imaging; ADC: Apparent diffusion coefficient.



enha

ncem

ent

was

obs

erve

d pr

ogre

ssiv

ely

incr

easi

ng in

inte

nsity

in

a yo

ung

fem

ale

patie

nt.

DSA e

xam

inat

ion

dem

onst

rate

d st

retc

hing

and

irr

egul

ar n

arro

win

g of

the

inte

rnal

car

otid

art

ery.

Mul

tiple

ven

ous

chan

nels w

ere

seen

per

sist

ing

in t

he v

enou

s ph

ase

(Fig

ure

4).

Con

tras

t en

hanc

ed M

RI

perfor

med

after

tw

o ye

ars

dem

onst

rate

d sign

ifica

nt s

hrin

kage

with

thr

ombo

sis

of t

he c

ente

r of

the

lesion

in o

ne p

atie

nt a

nd t

otal

reg

ress

ion

in a

noth

er (

Figu

re 5

). C

ompl

ete

rese

ctio

n of

CSH w

as p

ossibl

e in

tw

o pa

tient

s (F

igur

e 6)

. O

ne p

atie

nt h

ad a

sub

cen

timet

er le

sion

in the

left c

aver

nous

sin

us p

rese

ntin

g w

ith p

ainf

ul o

phth

alm

ople

gia

(Fig

ure

7).

Thre

e co

nspi

cuou

s im

agin

g fe

atur

es w

ere

cons

ider

ed h

ighl

y su

gges

tive

of t

he d

iagn

osis:

Hom

ogen

eous

hyp

erin

tens

ity o

n T2

W s

eque

nces

(14

/15,

93.

3%)

facilit

ated

di

ffus

ion

(10/

10,

100%

) an

d in

tens

e co

ntra

st e

nhan

cem

ent

(14/

14,

100%

). O

f th

e 13

pat

ient

s w

ho r

ecei

ved

surg

ery,

sub

tota

l ex

cision

or

biop

sy in

11 a

nd c

ompl

ete

excision

in

2 pa

tient

s w

ere

perfor

med

. Fo

ur p

atie

nts

rece

ived

rad

iatio

n th

erap

y (T

able

2).

Ele

ven

patie

nts

had

seria

l fo

llow

up

rang

ing

from

10

mo

to 9

0 m

o (m

ean

2.5

year

s) a

nd a

ll w

ere

asym

ptom

atic o

n th

e se

rial f

ollo

wu

p.

DIS

CU

SSIO

NEx

trac

ereb

ral C

SH a

re r

are

in o

ccur

renc

e w

ith a

defi

nite

fem

ale

prep

onde

ranc

e. T

hey

are

usua

lly a

ttac

hed

to t

he o

uter

wal

l of ca

vern

ous

sinu

s or

loca

ted

in t

he M

ecke

l’s

cave

or ce

rebe

llopo

ntin

e an

gle[1

,2] .

Elev

en o

f fif

teen

pat

ient

s in

our

stu

dy w

ere

fem

ales

and

the

ir pr

epon

dera

nce

is c

onside

red

to b

e du

e to

influ

ence

of es

trog

en. Sym

ptom

s ar

e slow

and

ins

idio

us p

rese

ntin

g w

ith h

eada

ches

, op

htha

lmop

legi

a, p

ropt

osis,

cran

ial ne

rve

palsy

and

endo

crin

e di

stur

banc

es[7

,8] .

In o

ur s

erie

s he

adac

he w

as t

he m

ost

com

mon

pre

sent

ing

com

plai

nt f

ollo

wed

by

visi

on a

bnor

mal

ity a

nd c

rani

al n

erve

pal

sy.

Imag

ing

findi

ngs

of m

enin

giom

as a

nd s

chw

anno

mas

in

this

loc

atio

n ov

erla

p sign

ifica

ntly. Ty

pica

lly, th

e le

sion

is n

ot d

emon

stra

ble

on a

ngio

grap

hy in

spi

te o

f th

e ad

jace

nt t

ortu

ous

and

serp

entin

e ar

teria

l fee

ders

and

ven

ous

drai

nage

. D

egen

erat

ion

into

thr

ombo

sis,

cal

cific

atio

n, h

yalin

e ch

ange

s an

d he

mor

rhag

e ar

e re

veal

ed b

y M

R im

agin

g[79

] . Ex

tens

ion

beyo

nd c

aver

nous

sin

us is

note

d in

lar

ge les

ions

whi

ch m

ay b

e se

en a

lso

in m

enin

giom

a, e

pide

rmoi

d, n

euro

geni

c tu

mor

s an

d gr

anul

omat

ous

mas

ses[3

,7] .

Exte

nsio

n be

yond

cav

erno

us s

inus

was

see

n in

all

siza

ble

lesion

s in

our

ser

ies

and

five

lesion

s sh

owed

ext

ensive

par

a-ca

vern

ous

exte

nsio

n. I

t w

as in

tere

stin

g to

not

e, o

ne

of o

ur C

SH e

xten

ded

into

the

sup

erio

r or

bita

l fis

sure

ant

erio

rly,

supe

riorly

int

o th

e su

pras

ella

r re

gion

, gr

eate

r w

ing

of s

phen

oid

bone

and

pte

rygo

id f

ossa

inf

erol

ater

ally

Tabl

e 3 D

emog

raph

y, c

linic

al f

eatu

res,

tre

atm

ent

and

follo

w u

p

Cas

e nu

mbe

r1

a2

a3

a4

a5

67

89

10

11

12

13

14

15

Age

5126

3847

5263

2633

5951

5034

3833

13Se

xF

MF

FF

FF

FM

MF

FF

FM

Loca

tion

Righ

tRi

ght

Left

Righ

tLe

ftLe

ftRi

ght

Left

Righ

tLe

ftRi

ght

Left

Left

Left

Left

Hea

dach

e1

yr2

yrYe

s4

yrYe

sN

oYe

s3

mo

Yes

Yes

Not

avai

labl

eN

oN

o6

mo

4 m

o

Vis

ual

sym

ptom

sYe

s12

mo

Blur

ring

6 m

oN

ilN

ilBl

urri

ngN

il6

mo

Nil

Not

avai

labl

eN

il2

mo

6 m

oN

il

Cra

nial

ner

ve

invo

lvem

entb

3rd, 4

th, 6

th6th

No

3rdN

o3rd

, 4th

, 6th

No

No

No

6thN

otav

aila

ble

Num

bnes

s fa

ceN

oN

o3rd

, 6th

Ope

rativ

e de

tails

Su

bto

tal

Sub

tota

lBi

opsy

Sub

tota

lN

osu

rger

ySu

b to

tal

Biop

sySu

bto

tal

No

surg

ery

Com

plet

e ex

cisi

onSu

bto

tal

Sub

tota

lSu

bto

tal

Sub

tota

lC

ompl

ete

exci

sion

Follo

w u

pN

osy

mpt

oms

No

sym

ptom

sN

osy

mpt

oms

No

sym

ptom

sN

osy

mpt

oms

Not

avai

labl

eN

osy

mpt

oms

No

sym

ptom

sN

otav

aila

ble

No

sym

ptom

sN

otav

aila

ble

No

sym

ptom

sN

osy

mpt

oms

No

sym

ptom

sN

osy

mpt

oms

a Rece

ived

radi

othe

rapy

: Cas

e no

1: 4

5 G

y in

25

frac

tions

; cas

e no

2: 2

5 G

y in

5 fr

actio

ns; c

ase

3: S

tere

otac

tic ra

dios

urge

ry -

13 G

y in

sing

le fr

actio

n; c

ase

4: R

ecei

ved

adju

vant

radi

othe

rapy

; b Cra

nial

ner

ves 3

(ocu

lom

otor

), 4

(troc

hlea

r),

and

6 (a

bduc

ens)

. F: F

emal

e; M

: Mal

e.



and into retroclival region posteriorly indistinguishable from a granulomatous or a neurogenic lesion[3,8]. Multiple cranial nerves and both internal carotid arteries traversing the cavernous sinus preclude complete surgical resection in addition to the risk of profuse bleeding. Tiny branches from the cavernous segment of the internal carotid artery may be revealed on digital subtraction angiography which are otherwise not appreciable on routine anatomical imaging[7,8]. Hypertrophied pial arteries, tumor stain and large draining veins were described in the intraaxial cavernous hemangioma closely resembling a highly vascular neoplasm[10,11].

On MR imaging, the lesions are seen as well-defined hypointense mass on T1W and markedly hyperintense mass on T2W sequence. In our series 14 of 15 patients (93%) showed these findings[3,4]. Schwannomas exhibit high signal intensity on T2W and display heterogeneous enhancement following the expected course of the nerves from which they arise. Meningiomas show similar signal intensity to gray matter on T2W unlike the CSH[3,12]. Delayed T1W GdDTPA imaging confirms the temporal course of enhancement of the lesion. Uniformly intense and homogeneous contrast enhancement of all our CSH distinctly differ from the intra axial cavernous hemangiomas which mostly do not show enhancement[9,12,13]. Hypointense hemosiderin rim is not a common feature which is otherwise seen in intraaxial cavernous hemangioma. Bowing and displacement of the lateral wall of the cavernous sinus is clearly depicted on MR imaging indicating the extradural extension[5,12] and extensive extradural extension was seen in 5 patients in our series.

Lack of restriction to diffusion may be explained due to slow flow within the lesion which allows free diffusion of water molecules. There are no intervening neural/cellular elements outside the vascular channels which can prevent free movement of the protons and cause restriction of diffusion in the extravascular spaces

Figure 3 Axial gradient recalled echo and contrast enhanced T1 weighted image axial magnetic resonance images. A: Axial gradient recalled echo sequence does not show any blooming; B: Contrast enhanced coronal T1 weighted image shows intensely enhancing lesion encasing the internal carotid artery.

Figure 4 Contrast enhanced sagittal and coronal T1 weighted images and lateral views of digital subtraction angiography arterial and venous phases of left internal carotid angiogram. A, B: Centripetal filling of the CSH in the left cavernous sinus is demonstrated; C: Arterial phase of DSA shows diffuse irregularity and stretching of C3 to C5 segments; D: Venous phase shows stasis in the venous channels within the CSH. CSH: Cavernous sinus hemangioma; DSA: Digital subtraction angiography.

A B

A B

C D

A B

C

Figure 5 Contrast enhanced axial, susceptibility weighted imaging and 2 years follow up axial CE images. A: SWI axial image shows isointense signal of the CSH; B: Contrast enhanced axial T1-W image demonstrates the postero-inferior extension of the CSH; C: Two years post-operative surveillance axial contrast enhanced T1-W image shows complete resolution of the lesion. T1-W: T1 weighted image; SWI: Susceptibility weighted image; CSH: Cavernous sinus hemangioma.



as well. Hence these lesions are iso or hypointense to brain parenchyma on DWI images[4,14,15]. One hundred percent patients in our series showed hypointense signal on DW imaging suggesting facilitated diffusion (mean ADC = 1.8296 ± 0.2038 103 cm2/s). Our series is the largest series which has looked into the incremental value of DW imaging in diagnosing CSH and results of our series suggest that facilitated diffusion is a consistent finding in CSH. However, at the b value = 1000 mm2/s used in our series, effect of intravoxel incoherent motion is less though it cannot be eliminated completely which might have contributed to low signal on DWI and high ADC values[14,15]. False negative results may be seen in CSH with hemorrhage within and may cause a diagnostic dilemma, which was not seen in our series. CSH should be entertained in the differential diagnosis of a homogeneously enhancing cavernous sinus lesion that does not show evidence of hemorrhage and shows facilitated diffusion[1517].

Blood flowing in the CSH is not exactly venous blood as it has not passed through a tissue and hence there is no oxygen extraction. Since the blood within the CSH behaves as oxygenated blood there is no susceptibility induced signal loss on SWI imaging,

as noted in our series. Similar signal intensities are observed in the cavernous hemangioma elsewhere in the body, unless there are phleboliths or thrombosed areas[9,13,14]. Hemorrhage has been reported in CSH[18]. Concentric layers of hemosiderin are the hallmark of intraaxial lesions due to recurrent hemorrhages into the wall of the lesion causing slow growth. None of the cases in our series showed this finding. At least two thirds of cavernous hemangiomas exhibit some degree of vascular blush unlike the parenchymal cavernous angiomas which are occult to catheter angiography[8,10,12]. Microscopically CSH consists of multiple vascular channels lined by a single layer of endothelium without muscular layer. In our series, vascular blush was noted from distal branches of middle meningeal artery and meningeal branches of internal carotid artery in 3 patients while one lesion was avascular on DSA as reported by Krief et al[19]. Delayed SPECT imaging of the red blood pool scintigrams demonstrate increased activity persistently in contrast to the photopenic areas in meningioma, chordoma and chondrosarcoma[18,19].

Sclerosing CSH is a less aggressive solid/semisolid entity in the spectrum of lesions of the cavernous sinus.

Figure 6 T1 weighted image plain, contrast enhanced axial magnetic resonance images and specimen photograph. A: Axial plain T1-W image shows large hypointense lesion in the left cavernous sinus; B: Contrast enhancement is intense in the axial T1-W image; C: The surgical specimen shows a well lobulated reddish mass resected entirely. T1-W: T1 weighted image.

A B C

A B C

Figure 7 T2 weighted image coronal plain and contrast enhanced T1 weighted images. A: T1-W coronal unenhanced image shows an isointense to hypointense signal in the left cavernous sinus without affecting the internal carotid artery; B: Coronal T2-W shows small heterogeneous signal intensity in the left cavernous sinus; C: T1-W contrast enhancement shows homogeneous enhancement of the small lesion causing painful ophthalmoplegia. T1-W: T1 weighted image; T2-W: T2 weighted image.



Aversa do Souto et al[20] and Shi et al[21] successfully operated a less aggressive CSH in the cavernous sinus by internal decompression without any lifethreatening intraoperative bleeding similar to the case 10 in this series. Connective tissue proliferation between the vascular spaces evolves into a more densely packed solid or semisolid sclerosing TypeB CSH over a period of time. On imaging the subtype B of CSH is hyperintense on T2W and shows heterogeneous contrast enhancement while subtypeA is soft and pulsatile having thin walled blood spaces with a propensity to bleed profusely during surgery. Due to the abundant vascularization of these lesions, surgery is extremely complex and is associated with high morbidity such as cranial neuropathies[20,22]. CSH respond to radiation unlike the extraaxial cavernous angiomas. Gamma Knife surgery is a safe and effective primary as well as adjuvant treatment modality for CSH[23,24]. In one series the reported posttherapy shrinkage of CSH using gamaknife surgery was reported to be 84.6% at 12 mo followup[25]. Twoyear followup of four patients in this series after stereotactic radiotherapy were asymptomatic. The mean followup in our series was 2.5 years and all patients had no symptoms over the serial followup. However, there are limitations of this study, as this was a retrospective study of a relatively small sample size we could not estimate the inter observer variability.

MR imaging findings reported in this study are characteristic and diagnostic of CSH. T1W hypointensity, homogeneous hyperintensity on T2W sequences, intense enhancement following gadolinium injection and facilitated diffusion on DW imaging establish the diagnosis prior to surgery. Absence of hemosiderin within the lesion on GRE with facilitated diffusion significantly increases the diagnostic accuracy. With the characteristic and favourable MR imaging evidence followed by an open biopsy, attempt for radical excision is unwarranted since CSH responds well to stereotactic radiation.

COMMENTSBackgroundEven though magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the modality of choice for characterising lesions at the cavernous sinus, the diagnosis of a cavernous hemangioma can still be in doubt, with the main differential diagnosis being a schwannoma of the V nerve or meningioma.

Research frontiersThe study aimed to elucidate the clinical, MRI, pathological features of these lesions and asses the incremental value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in diagnosing them.

Innovations and breakthroughsThis is one of the largest series of cavernous sinus hemangiomas that have clinical-radiological and pathological correlation as well as follow-up details. The study also highlights the incremental value of DWI imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient value in these lesions which has not elucidated in the existing literature.

Applications T1-weighted hypointensity with homogeneous hyperintensity on T2-weighted sequence, absence of hemosiderin within the lesion on GRE sequence and intense post contrast enhancement favour the diagnosis of cavernous sinus hemangioma (CSH). On DW imaging CSH shows facilitated diffusion and is nearly 100% specific for CSH. Markedly hypointense hemangioma on T1W images suggests schirrous nature of the lesion and are amenable to complete surgical excision.

TerminologyCavernous hemangioma in the cavernous sinus has an estimated prevalence of 1% incidence. The lesion is rare in occurrence closely mimicking commonly encountered cavernous sinus lesions such as schwannoma, meningioma, chordoma, granuloma, carotid aneurysm and lympho-proliferative conditions. Microscopically cavernous sinus hemangioma (CSH) consist of multiple vascular channels lined by a single layer of endothelium without muscular layer without any intervening neural tissue. Diffusion weighted MR imaging measures the diffusivity of the water molecules in the tissue. Hindrance of water molecule movement is gives a hyperintense signal on diffusion imaging interpreted as restricted diffusion and indicates high cellularity of the tissue. CSH shows facilitated diffusion on DWI.

Peer-reviewCavernous sinus hemangiomas (CSHs) is a benign vascular malformation which belong to Intracranial-extraaxial cavernous hemangiomas. Radiosurgery can effectively control the growth of smaller CSHs. Diagnosing CSH preoperatively is very important, but its radiological differential diagnosis is difficult. In this paper, the MRI sequence is abundant. Especially the number of DWI cases has a large proportion, which can provide valuable information for the diagnosis of CSH.

REFERENCES1 Simard JM, GarciaBengochea F, Ballinger WE, Mickle JP, Quisling

RG. Cavernous angioma: a review of 126 collected and 12 new clinical cases. Neurosurgery 1986; 18: 162172 [PMID: 3960293 DOI: 10.1227/0000612319860200000008]

2 Del Curling O, Kelly DL, Elster AD, Craven TE. An analysis of the natural history of cavernous angiomas. J Neurosurg 1991; 75: 702708 [PMID: 1919691 DOI: 10.3171/jns.1991.75.5.0702]

3 Razek AA, Castillo M. Imaging lesions of the cavernous sinus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 444452 [PMID: 19095789 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1398]

4 Yadav RR, Boruah DK, Yadav G, Pandey R, Phadke RV. Imaging characteristics of cavernous sinus cavernous hemangiomas. Neuroradiol J 2012; 25: 515524 [PMID: 24029085 DOI: 10.1177/197140091202500503]

5 Sohn CH, Kim SP, Kim IM, Lee JH, Lee HK. Characteristic MR imaging findings of cavernous hemangiomas in the cavernous sinus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24: 11481151 [PMID: 12812943]

6 Yao Z, Feng X, Chen X, Zee C. Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics with pathological correlation of cavernous malformation in cavernous sinus. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2006; 30: 975979 [PMID: 17082705 DOI: 10.1097/01.rct.0000221953.06135.3e]

7 Zhou LF, Mao Y, Chen L. Diagnosis and surgical treatment of cavernous sinus hemangiomas: an experience of 20 cases. Surg Neurol 2003; 60: 3136; discussion 3637 [PMID: 12865008 DOI: 10.1016/S00903019(03)001903]

8 Linskey ME, Sekhar LN. Cavernous sinus hemangiomas: a series, a review, and an hypothesis. Neurosurgery 1992; 30: 101108 [PMID: 1738435 DOI: 10.1227/0000612319920100000018]

9 Gonzalez LF, Lekovic GP, Eschbacher J, Coons S, Porter RW, Spetzler RF. Are cavernous sinus hemangiomas and cavernous malformations different entities? Neurosurg Focus 2006; 21: e6 [PMID: 16859259 DOI: 10.3171/foc.2006.21.1.7]

10 Rao VR, Pillai SM, Shenoy KT, Radhakrishnan VV, Mathews G. Hypervascular cavernous angioma at angiography. Neuroradiology 1979; 18: 211214 [PMID: 530433 DOI: 10.1007/BF00345728]

11 Numaguchi Y, Kishikawa T, Fukui M, Sawada K, Kitamura K,

COMMENTS



Matsuura K, Russell WJ. Prolonged injection angiography for diagnosing intracranial cavernous hemangiomas. Radiology 1979; 131: 137138 [PMID: 424574 DOI: 10.1148/131.1.137]

12 McEvoy SH, Farrell M, Brett F, Looby S. Haemangioma, an uncommon cause of an extradural or intradural extramedullary mass: case series with radiological pathological correlation. Insights Imaging 2016; 7: 8798 [PMID: 26385689 DOI: 10.1007/s132440150432y]

13 Jinhu Y, Jianping D, Xin L, Yuanli Z. Dynamic enhancement features of cavernous sinus cavernous hemangiomas on conventional contrastenhanced MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 577581 [PMID: 18065511 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0845]

14 Korchi AM, Cuvinciuc V, Caetano J, Becker M, Lovblad KO, Vargas MI. Imaging of the cavernous sinus lesions. Diagn Interv Imaging 2014; 95: 849859 [PMID: 23763988 DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2013.04.013]

15 Ginat DT, Mangla R, Yeaney G, Ekholm S. Diffusionweighted imaging of skull lesions. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2014; 75: 204213 [PMID: 25072014 DOI: 10.1055/s00341371362]

16 Bansal S, Suri A, Singh M, Kale SS, Agarwal D, Sharma MS, Mahapatra AK, Sharma BS. Cavernous sinus hemangioma: a fourteen year single institution experience. J Clin Neurosci 2014; 21: 968974 [PMID: 24524951 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.09.008]

17 Mathur A, Jain N, Kesavadas C, Thomas B, Kapilamoorthy TR. Imaging of skull base pathologies: Role of advanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques. Neuroradiol J 2015; 28: 426437 [PMID: 26427895 DOI: 10.1177/1971400915609341]

18 Salanitri GC, Stuckey SL, Murphy M. Extracerebral cavernous hemangioma of the cavernous sinus: diagnosis with MR imaging and labeled red cell blood pool scintigraphy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

2004; 25: 280284 [PMID: 14970031]19 Krief O, Sichez JP, Chedid G, Bencherif B, Zouaoui A, Le Bras F,

Marsault C. Extraaxial cavernous hemangioma with hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1991; 12: 988990 [PMID: 1950936]

20 Aversa do Souto A, Marcondes J, Reis da Silva M, Chimelli L. Sclerosing Cavernous Hemangioma in the Cavernous Sinus: Case Report. Skull Base 2003; 13: 9399 [PMID: 15912165 DOI: 10.1055/s2003820564]

21 Shi J, Hang C, Pan Y, Liu C, Zhang Z. Cavernous hemangiomas in the cavernous sinus. Neurosurgery 1999; 45: 13081313; discussion 13081313 [PMID: 10598697 DOI: 10.1097/0000612319991200000006]

22 Anqi X, Zhang S, Jiahe X, Chao Y. Cavernous sinus cavernous hemangioma: imaging features and therapeutic effect of Gamma Knife radiosurgery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2014; 127: 5964 [PMID: 25459244 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.09.025]

23 Tang X, Wu H, Wang B, Zhang N, Dong Y, Ding J, Dai J, Yu T, Pan L. A new classification and clinical results of Gamma Knife radiosurgery for cavernous sinus hemangiomas: a report of 53 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2015; 157: 961969; discussion 969 [PMID: 25862173 DOI: 10.1007/s0070101524175]

24 Wang Y, Li P, Zhang XJ, Xu YY, Wang W. Gamma Knife Surgery for Cavernous Sinus Hemanginoma: A Report of 32 Cases. World Neurosurg 2016; 94: 1825 [PMID: 27373416 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.06.094]

25 Park CK, Choi SK, Kang IH, Choi MK, Park BJ, Lim YJ. Radiosurgical considerations for cavernous sinus hemangioma: longterm clinical outcomes. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2016; 158: 313318 [PMID: 26658989 DOI: 10.1007/s0070101526574]

P- Reviewer: Chowdhury FH, Xie Q S- Editor: Song XX L- Editor: A E- Editor: Lu YJ


© 2017 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc7901 Stoneridge Drive, Suite 501, Pleasanton, CA 94588, USA

Telephone: +1-925-223-8242Fax: +1-925-223-8243

E-mail: [email protected] Desk: http://www.f6publishing.com/helpdesk

http://www.wjgnet.com

world journal of - microsoft · world journal of w j r radiology the world journal of radiology...

Documents