world bank documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/168021467996771146/... · 2016-07-08 · dps...

Document of

The World Bank

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Report No. 16174

PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT

BANGLADESH

BANGLADESH WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BWDB)SMALL SCHEMES PROJECT

(Credit No. 1467-BD)

December 11, 1996

Agriculture and Natural ResourcesOperations DivisionCountry Department 1South Asia Region

This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance oftheir official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization.

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

CUJRRENCY EQUIVALENTS Currency Unit = Bangladesh Taka (Tk)At Staff Appraisal Report Year (1983) = US$1.0 = Tk 25.0At Completion Year (1993) = US$1.0 = Tk 40.0

FISCAL YEAR July 16-July 15

WEIGHTS AND NIEASURES 1 Kilometer (km) = 0.62 mile1 acre (ac) = 0.405 hectare (ha)I metric ton (m ton) = 26.8 mound (md)

ABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMSADP Annual Development ProgrammeAman Rice planted before or during the monsoon and harvested in November or DecemberAus Rice planted during March or April and harvested during June or JulyB. When preceding a crop, means broadcast (B. Aman)Boro Rice planted in January or February and harvested in May or June.BWDB Bangladesh Water Development BoardDPEC Departmental Project Evaluation CommitteeDAE Department of Agriculture ExtensionDC Deputy CommissionerDPS III Directorate of Planning Schemes IIIERR Economic Rate of ReturnFFWP Food For Works ProgrammeFAO/CP FAO/World Bank Cooperative ProgrammeFCD Flood Control and DrainageFC Flood ControlGOB Government of BangladeshHYV High Yielding VarietyIDA International Development AssociationLV Local VarietyLLP Low Lift PumpMIWDFC Ministry of Irrigation, Water Development and Flood Control (renamed in 1994 as

Ministry of Water Resources)ML&LR Ministry of Land and Land RevenuesO&M Operation and MaintenancePC Polder CommitteePCR Project Completion ReportPMU Project Management UnitPP Project Proforma (a Government document required for budgetary

authorization for investment projects)SRP BWDB Systems Rehabilitation Project (Cr. 2099-BD)STW Shallow TubewellSDR Special Drawing RightSAR Staff Appraisal ReportT. When preceding a crop, means transplanted (T. Aman)UNDP United Nations Development ProgrammeWOP Without Project SituationWP With Project Situation

Vice President, South Asia Regional Office Mr. D. Joseph WoodDirector, Country Department I : Ms. Mieko NishimizuChief, Agriculture and Natural Resources Division Mr. Ridwan AliProject Officer : Mr. Md. Abdul Ghani

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYThe World Bank

Washington, D.C. 20433U.S.A.

Office of the Director-GeneralOperations Evaluation

December 11, 1996

OED EVALUATIVE MEMORANDUMON PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT

Bangladesh: Bangladesh Water Development Board Small Schemes Project (Credit 1467-BD)

The Bangladesh Water Development Board Small Schemes project, supported by Credit 1467-BD for US$41.5 million equivalent, was approved in FY84. It was closed on June 30, 1993, after fourextensions and a delay of four years. US$12.6 million was reallocated from credit savings to rehabilitatecoastal embankments damaged by a cyclone in 1991. Cofinancing for the project was provided by UNDPfor technical assistance and training. The FAO/World Bank Cooperative Program prepared the ProjectCompletion Report (PCR) for the South Asia Regional Office. The borrower submitted a short report,which is included as Part II.

The project's principal objective was to increase crop production and farm incomes, by reducingcrop losses and promoting higher yielding varieties through improved flood control, drainage andirrigation on small schemes. Secondary objectives were to strengthen the Bangladesh WaterDevelopment Board's (BWDB) ability to carry out similar schemes and operation and maintenance(O&M). To achieve these objectives the project included (i) construction of about 27 subprojectscovering 90,000 ha of cultivated land; (ii) upgrading BWDB's capacity for planning, design andconstruction of small schemes; and (iii) piloting O&M initiatives on completed schemes as well asschemes financed by the project. These initiatives included decentralization of BWDB O&M functions,cost recovery from beneficiaries, and the transfer of some responsibility for scheme management to localuser groups. The project was expected to be implemented over five years, allowing two years forconstruction of civil works at each site.

The implementation period was extended from five to nine years, due to shortfalls in counterpartfinance, difficulties with land acquisition, and delays at all stages of BWDB's design and constructionactivity. Plans for subprojects limited to drainage or irrigation were mostly dropped, and the total wasreduced from 27 to 17, mostly flood control schemes. The average construction period was five yearsinstead of two. Nevertheless, the size of individual schemes was larger than anticipated, and the projectexceeded its area, production and income targets. The PCR recomputes the economic rate of return(ERR) for the whole construction program (absorbing about 90 percent of disbursements), based on dataavailable from the same four schemes used to estimate the ERR at appraisal plus a fifth (irrigation)scheme, at 25 percent. The appraisal target was 30 percent. The lower ERR is due to the delayed accrualof benefits and lower crop prices. The physical achievements are offset and undermined by the lack ofprogress toward all O&M objectives. The PCR notes that BWDB O&M activity on the 17 subprojects is

Thls document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of theirofficial duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization.

2

deficient, that funds allocated to the pilot program to decentralize improved O&M were used by BWDBto finance rehabilitation rather than maintenance of existing schemes, that the program was eventuallyterminated by the Bank, and that the plans to both foster cost recovery and transfer O&M responsibilityto user groups were largely frustrated. The ERR reestimate does not include costs and benefits associatedwith credit disbursements of approximately US$13 million reallocated to the repair of coastalembankments (covered under a separate ICR for the embankment rehabilitation program) and US$7million used for the rehabilitation of existing schemes under the pilot O&M component.

The Operations Evaluation Department (OED) rates the overall project outcome as marginallysatisfactory: impressive gains in production were delayed by the construction program and are nowthreatened by deficiencies in O&M. Sustainability of the increased production is uncertain, untilimproved O&M removes what the PCR calls "severe risks" to the completed infrastructure. OED ratesinstitutional development as negligible, reflecting the multiple O&M activities promoted at appraisal andthen largely ignored. Bank performance was generally satisfactory. The PCR is also satisfactory, offeringa clear and comprehensive account of project implementation. However, it lacks a satisfactory discussionof monitoring and evaluation.

There are several lessons which are useful for operations elsewhere: (i) problems of landacquisition should be anticipated, and fair and orderly compensation measures planned in advance; (ii)the construction program should be tailored to a realistic projection of resources available togovernment; and (iii) government must fulfill its commitments to carry out regular O&M, supported bythe beneficiaries, otherwise the civil works will fail and the benefits will be unsustained.

No audit is planned.

Attachment

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY


BANGLADESH

BANGLADESH WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BWDB) SMALLSCHEMES PROJECT (CR. 1467-BD)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PREFACE ........................... i

EVALUATION SUMMARY .............. .............. iii

PARTI .............. 1

1. Project Identity ........................... 1

2. Background ........................... 1

3. Project Objectives and Description ........................... 2

4. Project Design and Organization ............................ 3

5. Project Implementation ...................-. - .- 4

6. Project Results .................. 10

7. Project Sustainability .................. 11

8. Bank Performance .................. 12

9. Borrower Performance .................. 13

10. Project Relationship .. ................ 13

11. Consulting Services .. 13

12. Project Documentation and Data ................... 14

This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of theirofficial duties. Its contents may not othermise be disclosed without World Bank authorization.

PART II ............................................... .. 15

PART HI ...................................... 16

1. Related IDA Credits ........... .................... 16

2. Project Timetable ............................... 17

3. Credit Disbursements (SDR miiion) ............................. 17

4. Project Implementation ................................ 18

5. Project Costs and Financing ............................... 19A. Project Costs .......... ..................... 19B. Project Financing (IJS$ million) ............................ 19

6. Project Results ............... ................ 20A. Direct Benefits ................................ 20B. Economic Impact ................................ 20C. Financial Impact ................................ 20D. Studies ....................................... 20

7. Status of Covenants ............................... 21

8. Use of Bank Resources ................................ 22A. Staff Inputs ............................... 22B. Missions ....................................... 23C. Costs ....................................... 23

ANNEXES:

1. Sub-Project, Technical Assistance and Project Costs2. Financial and Economic Re-Evaluation

Map #: IBRD 27965


BANGLADESH



PREFACE

This is the Project Completion Report (PCR) for the BWDB Small SchemesProject in Bangladesh for which IDA Credit 1467-BD in the amount of SDR 40.2 million(equivalent to US$41.5 million) was approved on May 1, 1984, and co-financing from UNDPgrant facility of US$2.0 million was signed on March 20, 1985. However, due to the reducedproject scope, the increase in the dollar value of the SDR and the resulting Credit savings, atotal amount of SDR 9.22 million was available for reallocation for the rehabilitation of cyclone-damaged coastal embankments'. After four extensions for a total period of 3 1/2years, the Creditwas closed on June 30, 1993. The last disbursement was made on November 2, 1993 and SDR40.15 million (including SDR 9.22 million for the rehabilitation of the cyclone damaged coastalembankments), almost the entire Credit amount, was disbursed. The UNDP grant facility wasused to fund the technical assistance and training components during the original implementationperiod between February 1985 and June 1990 and also during the extended implementationperiod from July 1990 to June 1991. Total grant funds were, therefore, increased to US$2.47million. Further, a sum of US$88,555 from the IDA Fifth Technical Assistance Project (Cr.1440-BD) was allocated to finance additional technical assistance during July 1991-February1992.

The Preface, Evaluation Summary and Parts I and III of the PCR was preparedby an FAO/World Bank Cooperative Programme mission2 which visited Bangladesh inMarch/April 1994. These sections were revised by staff of the Resident Mission and theAgriculture and Natural Resources Operations Division of the Country Department 1, South AsiaRegion. The report is based on a review of relevant project documents, field visits to selectedsubproject areas and discussions with the Borrower's project staff and associated IDA staff. TheBorrower submitted Part II in June 1994. The findings of the original mission have beenupdated to reflect progress in completion of key components of two subprojects after themission's departure.

1. The implementation of the coastal embankment rehabilitation program financed under this Credit, three othercredits, and grants from the European Union and Japan will be reviewed in a separate report.

2. Messrs. T. Lohavisavdpanich (Economist/Mission Leader), E.J.P. De Nooy (Flood Control and DrainageEngineer, Consultant) and Quazi Rezual Islam (Agronomist, National Consultant, for the duration of field visit).

- iii -


BANGLADESH



EVALUATION SUMMARY

Project Objectives

(i) The principal objective of the project was to increase crop production and farmincomes by adding areas under High Yielding Variety (HYV) through improved drainage or byproviding irrigation, and by reducing crop losses by providing flood protection. The secondaryobjective was to support the Operation and Maintenance (O&M) of subprojects and transfer ofO&M responsibilities to beneficiaries after construction. To achieve these objectives, the projectwas designed to: (i) construct about 27 subprojects (22 flood control and drainage (FCD) and5 irrigation), covering a total of 91,125 ha of net cultivated land; (ii) initiate O&M ofsubprojects funded under the project and the pilot decentralized O&M programme of allBWDB's completed schemes located in four BWDB's divisions; and (iii) strengthen BWDB'scapacity in planning and implementation of small schemes.

Project Implementation

(ii) Overall, project implementation was very slow and took about nine years (untilJune 1993) to complete the reduced targets of 17 subprojects. With a few exceptions, theaverage time taken to complete civil works in each subproject was 5 years as against 2 yearsestimated at appraisal. Also, the land acquisition for many subprojects continued even after thecompletion of construction. Major problems causing slow implementation were: (a) initialdelays in the Credit effectiveness by 11 months; (b) overambitious project targets;(c) Government of Bangladesh's (GOB's) lengthy and cumbersome approval and processingprocedures for land acquisition; (d) delays in approval of Project Proforma (PP)'; (e) inadequateAnnual Development Program (ADP) allocations up to 1990 and the time-consuming fundrelease procedures; (f) delays in preparation and approval of designs; (g) delays in authorizationof annual work plans; (h) delays in the preparation and approval of bids and award of contracts;(i) untimely delivery of construction equipment and material by BWDB to contractors; (j) theintroduction of contracts on turnkey basis in 1989, under which contractors had to supply theirown equipment and other resources, without adequate adjustments in prequalification procedures

1. A GOB document is required for obtaining budgetary authorization for investment projects.

- iv -

to exclude contractors without sufficient equipment and resources; (k) poor performance ofcontractors due to lack of adequate resources and experience; and (1) weak project coordinationand management.

(iii) Because of serious implementation delays and low achievements in civil works,which gave rise to substantial savings in the Credit, the project was restructured and reduced inscope thrice. The implementation period was extended four times for a total implementationperiod of 9 years. The project as restructured included: (i) reduction in number of subprojectsfrom the original of 27 to 19 subprojects in 1987; (ii) deletion of two subprojects (Perizpur-Hizalgachi and Madhapur) in 1989 due to shortage of local funds and low economic viabilityrespectively; and (iii) reduction in scope of civil works in 1991 in three subprojects (HaldaExtension, Gangajhuri, Tarail Pachuria) due to the limited implementation period during thesecond and third Credit extensions. As a result of the reduced project scope, the increase in thedollar value of the SDR and the consequent Credit savings, a total of SDR 9.22 million wasavailable for reallocation in 1992 for the rehabilitation of cyclone damaged coastalembankments.2 Further, because funds provided for the implementation of the pilotdecentralized O&M component were utilized for only the rehabilitation of 26 completed schemesrather than regular maintenance works, the programme was suspended in 1991.

(iv) The UNDP grant facility was provided to fund the technical assistance andtraining during the original period between February 1985 and June 1990. However, it wasextended to June 1991 to cover the increased technical assistance required for the increasedfeasibility studies and engineering designs of subprojects and monitoring of construction duringthe extended project implementation period. Total grant funds were increased from the originalamount of US$2.0 million to US$2.47 million. In addition, a sum of US$88,555 was allocatedfrom the IDA Fifth Technical Assistance Project (Cr. 1440-BD) to finance additional technicalassistance needs during July 1991-February 1992.

Proiect Results

(v) Overall, despite implementation delays, the project has largely achieved itsprincipal objective of increasing crop production. In terms of physical achievements, althoughonly 17 subprojects (63 % of the appraisal target of 27) were completed, the total benefitted areashave increased by 18% from 91,125 ha estimated at appraisal to 107,789 ha at projectcompletion. However, it has been only partially successful in introducing the improved O&Mof subprojects with beneficiaries' participation. It could not also initiate nationwide improvedO&M of all BWDB's completed schemes through the implementation of the pilot decentralizedO&M programme.

(vi) At Credit closure in June 1993, only 15 FCD subprojects were completed,including 7 FCD, 6 FC and 2 drainage subprojects. The main works for the remaining 2

2. This component, financed also from 3 other IDA credits and European Community andJapanese grants, will be covered in a separate ICR.

irrigation subprojects were completed only in October 1993. At the Closing Date the pumpingstations at the Chenchuri irrigation subproject had not been commissioned due to electrical andmechanical problems while the operation of the two pumping stations at the Halda irrigationsubproject was still being tested. However, based upon work completed after Credit closure,the Chenchuri and Halda pumping stations are now in operating condition. Remaining work inexcavating secondary and tertiary canals at Halda is expected to be completed in FY96.

(vii) Despite the fact that several subprojects were declared complete by BWDB, theperformance of these completed subprojects has been poor, mainly due to lack of proper O&M.This was evident by the results of the 1992 operational status survey of the completedsubprojects which indicated that none of the civil works of subprojects were fully completed tothe designed level of services required. Subsequently, additional rectification works were carriedout in FY93 and FY94 to ensure effective operation before handing-over to the O&M Divisions.

(viii) The implementation of the two O&M components (O&M of subprojects and thepilot decentralized O&M programme) has also been unsatisfactory, mainly due to lack ofinitiative and commitment of BWDB. In fact, only rehabilitation works were carried out. Inaddition, although Polder Committees (PCs) were formed in 1985 before the commencement ofthe construction of subprojects, they have been inactive and the entire concept of beneficiaries'participation was neglected by BWDB. Since 1992, efforts were concentrated on organizingmotivational meetings to create awareness for O&M among beneficiaries and forming smallerand manageable sluice committees in all subproject areas. These efforts have not met with muchsuccess as most of these committees have not been functional, mainly due to the limitedmotivational meetings and lack of clear institutional arrangements for beneficiaries' O&Mresponsibilities. Consequently, the transfer of O&M responsibilities to sluice committees andbeneficiaries has not been achieved. Work is continuing under another project (see para xii) toimprove O&M and introduce beneficiary participation on a national basis.

(ix) Agricultural Impact. The incremental crop production at full development isestimated at 184,400 tons annually, 68% higher than the appraisal estimates of 109,500 tons.The larger benefited areas and higher incremental yields of paddy are the main contributingfactors. The increases in yields have resulted from the project works which encouraged farmersto adopt HYV seeds and the imnproved farming by transplanting paddy. Based on the results ofthe bench mark surveys, crop data provided by the Department of Agriculture Extension (DAE)and additional interviews with farmers by the PCR mission, the cropping intensities haveincreased by 20%-40% and yields of paddy by 10%-50% (10%-15% in FCD and 30%-50% inirrigation subprojects).

(x) Economnic Rate of Return. The economic rates of return (ERRs) were calculatedfor 5 of the 17 projects and extrapolated for the total project. The ERRs in FY94 constantprices, were re-estimated at about 18%-30% for 4 subprojects (Kangsha FCD, Bighai FC,Kalaroa drainage and Chenchuri Beel irrigation) and 25.2% for the whole project compared withthe appraisal estimate of 21%-40% and 30% respectively. The lower ERRs are mainly due tothe substantially longer implementation period resulting in delayed accrual of benefits and lowerprices of outputs than anticipated at project appraisal. Due to substantially higher investmentand O&M costs than anticipated at appraisal and smaller service area, the re-estimated ERR ofthe Halda Extension subproject is 12%.

- vi -

(xi) Income Effects. The project works have helped to raise the net farm incomesof farmers in the project areas. Farm budget analyses show that at full development net farmincomes for 3 acre farms would increase by 35% for FCD subprojects and 170% for irrigationsubprojects over the without project situation. The re-estimated incremental annual net farmincomes from 3 acre farms, expressed in FY94 constant prices, would be Tk 8,000-Tk 36,000,reflecting real increases of 37%-170% over the appraisal estimates (adjusted to FY94 prices) ofTk 5,850-Tk 13,140. The project has directly benefitted about 92,300 farm families, 15% overthe appraisal estimates.

Project Sustainability

(xii) The sustainability of the project activities would depend on the priority given tothe implementation of the improved O&M of subprojects by GOB/BWDB and the effectivenessand the level of beneficiaries' participation in undertaking the preventive maintenance. Theunsatisfactory situation due to lack of O&M and beneficiaries' participation during projectimplementation indicates that the sustainability of the completed infrastructure is at risk.However, the situation could improve as O&M of completed BWDB subprojects, including the17 subprojects completed under this project, and introduction of beneficiaries' participation inpreventive maintenance is being addressed under the on-going Systems Rehabilitation Project(Cr. 2099-BD). IDA has indicated that further financial assistance to the irrigation subsectoris dependant upon adequate progress by GOB/BWDB in fulfilling this commitment.

Findings and Lessons Learned

(xiii) The project suffered from a number of shortcomings from the design stagethrough implementation. The most important were technical shortcomings, funding constraintsand institutional and organizational weaknesses. These are related mainly to: (a) theoverambitious project scope and the Government's cumbersome land acquisition procedures andlimited financial resources; (b) economic viability of some subprojects agreed after appraisal maynot have been reviewed as thoroughly as the subprojects checked at appraisal; (c) unanticipatedhydromorphological changes which caused erosion to the completed infrastructure for onesubproject and resulted in high O&M costs for another; and (d) lack of clear institutionalarrangements for the transfer of O&M responsibilities to beneficiaries, which was expected tobe implemented by PCs to be organized during project implementation. The chief institutionalweakness was a lack of initiative and commitment of BWDB concerning O&M works which isnow threatening the sustainability of subprojects. Another organizational weakness wasineffective project coordination and project management.

(xiv) The implementation experience suggests a number of lessons. The most importantones are:

(a) to ensure timely and successful project implementation, it is essential to tailor theconstruction programme to the practical resources of the Government with prudentallowance for the time required for the completion of pre-construction activities;

- vii -

(b) the economic viability of subprojects agreed after appraisal should be checked withthe same thoroughness as subprojects reviewed at appraisal;

(c) the successful implementation of improved O&M of subprojects and the transfer ofthe preventive maintenance to beneficiaries requires a strong commitment from theBorrower/BWDB, the organization of beneficiaries in smaller and manageablegroups and a clear institutional arrangements for beneficiaries' O&Mresponsibilities;

(d) timely completion of pre-construction activities requires effective projectmanagement with strong support from the inter-agency coordination committee toresolve implementation issues among different agencies; and

(e) it is essential for GOB/BWDB to fulfil its commitments for carrying out regularO&M with increasing responsibilities borne by beneficiaries, without which theinvestments in subprojects would be lost and benefits not sustained.


BANGLADESH


(Credit 1467-BD)

PART I: PROJECT REVIEW FROM IDA'S PERSPECTIVE

1. Project Identity

Project Name BWDB Small Schemes Project

Credit No. 1467-BD

RVP Unit South Asia

Country Bangladesh

Sector : Agriculture

Sub-sector Flood Control, Irrigation, and Drainage

2. Background

2.1 The Government's development strategy, as enunciated in the Second Five-YearPlan (1980-85) document, gave highest priority to the objectives of achieving foodgrain self-sufficiency. In the water sub-sector, the strategy for assisting the Government in reaching thisobjective was to emphasize short gestation, low-cost and high return subprojects, in line withthe 1972 World Bank report "Bangladesh Land and Water Sector Study" and reconfirmed in the1979 joint document of the Government and the World Bank-Review of BWDB. Minorirrigation schemes in areas of little or no flooding, and drainage and flood control schemes inareas of moderate flooding were to be emphasized.

2.2 In support of this strategy, since increased cultivated area resulting from floodcontrol and drainage works, expanded minor irrigation facilities and the diffusion of highyielding variety (HYV) seeds were considered as major factors contributing to the increased foodproduction, the Bank approved a series of flood control, drainage and irrigation projects. TheBWDB Small Schemes Project (Cr. 1467-BD), the fifth in a series of such projects, was

- 2 -

approved on May 1, 1984. The last Credit in the series (Cr. 2099-BD) was approved in 1990for the BWDB Systems Rehabilitation Project (SRP).

3. Project Objectives and Description

3.1 The principal objective of the project was to increase crop production and farmincomes by adding areas under HYV through improved drainage or by providing irrigation, andby reducing crop losses from flooding by providing flood protection. The secondary objectiveswere to support the transfer of the operation and maintenance (O&M) of completed subprojectsto local bodies, foster recovery of irrigation O&M costs from beneficiaries and strengthenBWDB's capacity in executing small schemes. To achieve these objectives, the project wasdesigned to: (i) construct about 27 subprojects in ten districts, covering a total of 91,125 ha ofnet cultivated land. These included 8 flood control and drainage (FCD), covering about 25,920ha, 8 drainage, covering about 31,590 ha, 6 flood control (FC), covering about 23,895 ha, and5 irrigation, covering about 9,720 ha; (ii) strengthen BWDB's capacity for planning, design,construction and O&M of the subprojects funded under the project; and (iii) initiate an O&Mprogramme for all BWDB's completed schemes located in four BWDB divisions of Comilla,Satkhira, Rajshahi and Moulvi Bazar, through a pilot decentralized O&M programme. Underthe institutional strengthening component, funds were to be provided for the procurement ofconstruction and O&M equipment and vehicles, and about 1,118 staff-months of technicalassistance (60 staff-months of foreign consultants and 1,058 staff-months of local consultants)for the preparation of feasibility studies, design and construction supervision of subprojects andthe evaluation of project impact, and training of BWDB's personnel.

3.2 Total project costs, including physical and price contingencies, were estimated atUS$58.0 million (Tk 1,449.8 million). An IDA Credit of US$41.5 million (SDR 40.2 million)was to finance all the foreign exchange costs (24%) and about 62.5 % of local costs. UNDP wasto provide a grant facility amounting to US$2.0 million to fund the technical assistance andtraining. The balance of US$14.5 million was to be met by Government's Annual DevelopmentProgramme (ADP) budget allocations (US$ 11.3 million) and farmers' contribution (US$3.2million).

3.3 BWDB of the Ministry of Irrigation, Water Development and Flood Control(MIWDFC)' was the principal implementing agency. Within BWDB, the Directorate ofPlanning Schemes III (DPS III), later the Manager of the Project Management Unit (PMU)2 ,was responsible for the coordination of project planning and implementation, and procurementof consultants and equipment. Coordination of project activities at national level as well asresolving policy issues that might arise during implementation were entrusted to the

1. MIWDFC was renamed in 1994 as Ministry of Water Resources.

2. DPS III was disbanded in January 1993 and since February 1993 the coordination of project planning andimplementation activities have been handled by PMU.

- 3 -

Departmental Project Evaluation Committee (DPEC) of MIWDFC. At the field level, poldercommittees (PCs) were to be established in each subproject to encourage participation ofbeneficiaries initially in project planning and implementation, and subsequently in assumingresponsibilities for O&M of subprojects after construction.

4. Project Design and Organization

4.1 In support of the above development strategy (para 2.1), the Government in late1982 signed a contract with a consulting firm to prepare feasibility studies of four typicalsubprojects (Kangsha River FCD, Kalaroa drainage, Bighai FC and Chenchuri Beel irrigation)financed under the IDA Fourth Technical Assistance Project (Cr. 1124-BD). Subsequently, anIDA mission visited Bangladesh in June 1983 to appraise the project based on the completed fourfeasibility studies.

4.2 The project was conceptualized as a continuation of the low-cost, small scale, andquick gestation flood control and drainage and irrigation development efforts undertaken byGovernment with financial assistance from IDA and other donors. However, given severalconstraints which existed at the time of appraisal, particularly GOB's cumbersome proceduresfor land acquisition and funding constraints, the scope of the proposed project was too large forcompletion within a reasonable implementation period. The delays resulting from theseconstraints eventually led to the reduction of the scope of the project from the original target of27 to 17 subprojects and the re-scheduling of the implementation period from 51/2 years to 9years (para 5. 1).

4.3 The design of the embankments, drainage structures and the drainage network wasgenerally appropriate to achieve flood control and improved drainage. However, for twosubprojects (Bighai and Kalaroa) questions have been raised as to whether thehydromorphological changes in meandering river channels and silting river arms were adequatelyconsidered in the engineering design of subprojects and in decisions as to the locations of majorstructures. There has been erosion of some completed infrastructure in one subproject andanother subproject requires frequent desiltation to enable drainage regulators to functionproperly. At the Bighai subproject, the shifting river channels have reduced the foreland in frontof regulator no. 7 at a rate of 12-1Sm annually and concern has been expressed as to whetherregulators would eventually disappear in the river channels. At the Kalaroa subproject, adequatedrainage is assured only with frequent desilting of the Betna river channel. However, theconsultants contend that these factors were considered and that the project designs were the bestalternatives based on the information available and the difficulties in predicting erosion.

4.4 The design of one of the two irrigation subprojects was also appropriate. However,the economic viability of the Halda Extension subproject as originally designed is questionable.The scope of work to be executed by BWDB was subsequently reduced to what could not bedone by the beneficiaries themselves. The secondary and tertiary canals of the Halda subprojectwere thus left out and the infrastructure was completed only for the main canal pumping and

- 4 -

conveyance systems. This was done to (a) reduce public sector expenditure on the irrigationsystem and (b) induce beneficiary participation and thus improve sustainability. GOB agreedto the design change and assured completion of the project through beneficiary participation.We are told that remaining work under this subproject will be completed by June 1996.

4.5 At appraisal, the role of DPEC, DPS III, BWDB's field divisions and PCs wasgenerally well defined. However, the overall project coordination and management duringproject implementation period was below expectations, and the important institutionaldevelopment functions vital for the successful project implementation have not been fully carriedout. The slow implementation was caused partly by the irregular meetings of DPEC and itsinsufficient attention to major implementation issues, particularly the delays in land acquisition,untimely approval of Project Proforma (PP) and inadequate ADP allocations. At BWDB'sheadquarters, late release of ADP, delays in authorization of annual work plan and delivery ofequipment to field divisions, and inadequate coordination of project implementation activities byDPS III adversely affected progress of physical works. At the field level, delays in preparationand approval of tender documents and the subsequent evaluation of bids and award of contractscaused further delays in implementation. Sub-standard works in some subprojects could havebeen avoided by better supervision of construction.

5. Project Implementation

5.1 Critical Variances in Project Implementation. The IDA Credit became effectivein April 1985, 1 1-months behind schedule, due to delays in the completion of the engineeringdesigns of subprojects and land acquisition for the construction programme in the first year.Further, because of serious implementation delays and low achievements in civil works, theproject was restructured and reduced in scope thrice. The implementation period was extendedfour times for a total period of 31/2 years from the original Closing date of December 31, 1989to June 19933. The changes in the project due to restructuring included: (i) reduction in 1987in number of subprojects from the original 27 to 19 subprojects, due to the increased averagesize of subprojects from about 3,400 ha estimated at appraisal to about 8,000 ha; (ii) deletionof two subprojects (Perizpur-Hizalgachi and Madhapur) in 1989 due to shortage of local fundsand low economic viability respectively; and (iii) reduction in scope of civil works in 1991 inthree subprojects (Halda Extension, Gangajhuri, Tarial Pachuria) due to the limitedimplementation period remaining during the second and third Credit extensions and, in the caseof Halda, the over-expensive original design. As a result of the reduced scope of the project,the increase in the dollar value of the SDR and the consequent Credit savings, a total of SDR9.22 million was available in 1992 and was used for the urgently needed rehabilitation of coastal

3. The last 6-month extension to June 30, 1993 was limited to the coastal embankment rehabilitation work followingthe April 1991 cyclone and one equipment contract. For all other components the Closing Date was December31, 1992.

embankments damaged by the 1991 cyclone.4 Further, the implementation of the pilotdecentralized O&M was suspended in 1991, as BWDB could not come up with a suitable planfor regular maintenance and was planning to use the funds for this component for rehabilitationof completed schemes.

5.2 Overall. As already noted (para 5.1), project implementation was very slow andit took about nine years to complete the reduced target of 17 subprojects. With a fewexceptions, the average time taken to complete civil works in each case was 5 years as against2 years estimated at appraisal. Also, the land acquisition for many subprojects continued evenafter the completion of construction. Major problems causing slow implementation were:(i) initial delays in the Credit effectiveness by 11 months; (ii) GOB's lengthy and cumbersomeland acquisition procedures; (iii) delays in approval of PP; (iv) inadequate ADP allocations upto 1990 and the time consuming fund release procedures; (v) delays in preparation and approvalof designs; (vi) delays in authorization of annual work plans; (vii) delays in the preparation andapproval of bids and award of contracts; (viii) poor performance of contractors due to lack ofadequate resources and experience and; (ix) weak project coordination and management.

5.3 The implementation of the two O&M components ( O&M of subprojects and thepilot decentralized O&M programme) has also been unsatisfactory, due mainly to lack ofinitiative and commitment of BWDB. In fact, only rectification works, rather than regularO&M, were carried out and the pilot O&M component was suspended. In addition, because ofinadequate motivational meetings and lack of clear institutional arrangements for beneficiaries'O&M responsibilities, neither PCs nor sluice committees have been functional. Consequently,the transfer of O&M responsibilities to sluice committees and beneficiaries has been achievedonly in a few cases.

5.4 Land acquisition. Total land requirements were substantially reduced due to thereduced project scope and the non-implementation of several drainage channels. At projectclosure in June 1993, a total of 1,120 ha were actually acquired for the 17 subprojects, or 68%of the total land requirements of 1,639 ha (Annex 1, Table 1). The remaining 519 ha have beenmade available to BWDB through local arrangements initiated in 1989, under which landowners,who were also the project beneficiaries, agreed and surrendered land to BWDB with assurancethat land compensation will be made after completion of official formalities at the DeputyCommissioner (DC) offices. Difficulties in land acquisition was the most serious problem whichadversely affected the construction programme. Delays were caused mainly by the lack of aland acquisition plan, lengthy and cumbersome land acquisition procedures, inadequate approvalauthority of DC, shortage of land acquisition staff, inadequate and untimely deposit of funds inDC's offices, public opposition, inadequate levels of land compensation (based on recordedvalues of land transactions which are frequently understated to avoid taxes) and late payment.

4. The implementation of the coastal embankment rehabilitation program financed under thecredit, three other credits and grants from the European Union and Japan will be reviewedin a separate report.

- 6 -

Although these constraints were beyond the control of BWDB, the problem could have beenreduced through the preparation of a land acquisition annual plan, DPEC's regular meetings toensure close coordination between DPS III and the Ministry of Land and Land Revenues(ML&LR) and regular follow-up by staff of BWDB field divisions at DC offices.

5.5 Construction. The project actually took 9 years to complete the civil works of 17subprojects, including 7 FCD, 6 FC, 2 drainage and 2 irrigation subprojects against the SARtargets of 27 subprojects. However, due to design changes, the area served by the 17subprojects (134,665 ha) is 50% in excess of the originally planned 27 subprojects (91,125 ha).The actual construction period of 9 years against 5 years at appraisal cannot be deemedsatisfactory. Delays in the construction were caused by the problems noted in para 5.2 and alsothe late delivery by BWDB of the construction materials and equipment to contractors,cancellation of tenders and invitations of fresh tenders and an introduction in 1989 of contractingon a turnkey basis, under which contractors were supposed to supply their own materials,equipment and other resources. Many of the contractors hired had difficulties with these newprocedures, which may indicate inadequate prequalirication.

5.6 Initially, 19 out of 27 subprojects were approved by BWDB for implementation butthe number of subprojects was subsequently reduced to 17 as the Madhapur and Perizpur-Hizalgachi subprojects were deleted in 1989. At the original Credit Closing Date in December1989, only 5 subprojects were declared complete by BWDB (Annex 1, Table 1). Four and fiveadditional subprojects were completed at the end of the first and second Credit extensions toDecember 1990 and 1991 respectively. In order to try to complete the civil works of theremaining 3 subprojects (Chenchuri, Halda Extension, Kalidashkhali) in FY92, the scope ofworks in the Halda extension was further reduced by curtailing the secondary and tertiarydistribution systems. However, only the Kalidashkhali subproject was completed during FY92.During the PCR mission's field visit in March 1994, the pumping stations at the Chenchurisubproject had not yet been commissioned after 51/2 years, due to constraints including electricaland mechanical problems, difficulties in matching electric motors with axial flow pumps and thedefective transformers. At the Halda Extension subproject, the operation of the two pumpingstations was still being tested. The repairs of the Chenchuri pumps have been completed andthe Chenchuri and Halda pumps are now in operating condition. Remaining work on thesecondary and tertiary canals for Halda is expected to be completed by June 1996.

5.7 Despite the fact that several subprojects were declared complete by BWDB, theperformance of these completed subprojects has been poor due mainly to lack of proper O&Mas observed by IDA's supervision missions in late 1991. Following the IDA's recommendations,BWDB conducted a survey on the operational status of the completed subprojects to identify theshortcomings and remedy defects to ensure effective operations. The survey was completed inJune 1992 and the results indicated that none of the civil works of subprojects were consideredfully complete for the designed level of services required. Before handing these subprojectsover to the O&M Divisions, additional rectification works were needed to ensure effectiveoperation. Additional repair works were required largely due to: (a) lack of regularmaintenance; (b) poor condition of embankments resulting from poor construction methods (cuts,

-7-- 7 -

breaches, slips in slopes, erosion by wave-action, damages caused by meandering channels,inadequate cross-section); (c) damages to structures caused by inappropriate operatingprocedures; and (d) poor drainage (Annex 1, Table 3). Subsequently, the PP was revised toinclude ADP allocations for the rectification works in 17 subprojects in FY93 but only 9subprojects were completed. An additional ADP allocation of Tk 132.5 million was earmarkedfor FY94 for completion of the rectification works in the remaining 8 subprojects and theinstallation of pumps in the Halda Extension subprojects. In addition, about 6,000 tons of wheat(Tk 36 million) were provided under FFWP for additional earthworks in 11 subprojects. At thetime of the completion report visit, the earthworks were underway, but the rectification workshad not yet started. These works have now been completed.

5.8 Operation and Maintenance of Subprojects. At appraisal, O&M of subprojectswas included in the project scope. The main thrust was to enable BWDB to carry out theperiodic maintenance, and to directly involve beneficiaries in the preventive maintenance. Theproject was to provide technical assistance for the preparation of O&M manuals and funds forO&M works during and after construction of subprojects. Initially, due to lack of enoughattention by BWDB, no ADP allocations were provided in the PP until 1991. Subsequently, dueto lack of initiative and commitment of BWDB's field divisions, the O&M manuals prepared byconsultants during FY85-FY92 for 13 subprojects (para 5.14) were not used by BWDB as theoperational guidelines and little O&M work has been carried out with beneficiaries'participation. At Credit closure, a limited amount of Tk 15.6 million, or 22% of the appraisalestimate of Tk 71.0 million, had been spent for O&M in 10 subprojects in FY92 and 7subprojects in FY93. A lack of regular O&M was threatening the sustainability of the completedsubprojects. However, GOB/BWDB has now prepared an O&M plan and budget for allcompleted subprojects. About Tk 56.7 million will be required annually, including about Tk30.7 million (Tk 296/ha/year) for 15 FCD, Tk 4.8 million (Tk 4,630/ha/year) for the ChenchuriBeel and Tk 21.2 million (Tk 36,840/ha/year) for the Halda Extension subproject.

5.9 Beneficiaries' Participation. In order to ensure the sustainability of the completedsubprojects through beneficiaries' commitment and support, Government's main thrust was tomake O&M of small schemes the responsibilities of beneficiaries which was to be administeredthrough the responsible PCs. However, the results during project implementation wereunsatisfactory. Although PCs were formed in 1985 before the commencement of theconstruction of subprojects, they have been inactive and the entire concept of beneficiaries'participation was totally neglected by BWDB. Since 1992 efforts were concentrated onorganizing motivational meetings to create awareness for O&M among beneficiaries and formingsmaller and manageable sluice committees in all subproject areas. However, these efforts alsohave not met with much success. Most of these committees have not been functional due mainlyto the limited motivational meetings and lack of clear institutional arrangements for beneficiaries'O&M responsibilities. At project closure, only a few of the sluice committees have beenfunctional, confined to controlling the functioning of gates and in some cases collecting cash andin kind contributions to remunerate the sluice operators and purchase lubricating materials forthe gates. The People's Participation Guidelines recently approved by BWDB provide a useful

- 8 -

framework for the mobilization of beneficiaries' participation and in defining their O&Mresponsibilities.

5.10 Pilot Decentralized O&M Program. The project was to initiate a pilotdecentralized O&M programme for all BWDB's completed schemes in four BWDB divisions(para 3.1). It was to assign full O&M responsibilities within a division to specific staff andfunds were to be provided to carry out these responsibilities. In addition, four staff-months oftechnical assistance were provided to help BWDB in planning and execution of the programme.

5.11 The implementation was initially delayed by the late preparation of O&M proposalsfrom the O&M divisions and delays in the approval of the revised PP to extend theimplementation period from 3 years to 5 years as originally planned at appraisal. Subsequently,consultants were recruited to review the O&M proposals of the four O&M divisions and preparefinal O&M work plans in 1986. Although the O&M work plans provided sufficient details onrehabilitation works, not enough details were prepared for regular O&M after rehabilitation.The proposed O&M plans also specified high staff requirements which would have been difficultto implement by GOB/BWDB. Inadequate account was taken of possibilities for reducing costsand improving reliability through beneficiary participation. However, it became apparent thatsubstantial rehabilitation works had to be carried out in all the completed schemes before theycould be handed over to the O&M Divisions for effective operation and subsequently tobeneficiaries. Therefore, a total of 26 schemes, including 11 FCD covering about 104,550 haand 15 FC covering about 454,500 ha, were rehabilitated and some new structures wereconstructed during FY86-FY90. However, as BWDB failed to carry out regular O&M afterthe completion of rehabilitation works, the pilot O&M programme was suspended in 1991 -- tobe taken over under the on-going Systems Rehabilitation Project, which is intended to establishthe institutional framework for O&M.

5.12 Procurement of Equipment. The project was to provide funds for the procurementof construction and office equipment and vehicles for the design, construction and O&M ofsubprojects and the implementation of the pilot O&M programme. The procurement ofequipment was seriously delayed due to the late calling of tenders and the consequent lengthyand cumbersome bid evaluation and approval procedures. The actual procurement was muchlower than the appraisal estimates (Annex 1, Table 6) due to funding constraints, GOB's importrestriction imposed in 1988 and the introduction of contracting on a turnkey basis (para 5.5).

5.13 Technical Assistance. Support for technical assistance prior to the Crediteffectiveness was provided under the IDA Fourth Technical Assistance Project (Cr. 1124-BD)for the identification and preparation of feasibility studies of 15 subprojects and engineeringdesigns of 10 subprojects. By November 1984, feasibility studies of 15 subprojects and designsof 8 subprojects were completed. However, the designs of 2 subprojects were only partiallydone and the remaining works had to be completed by the consultants financed under the project.

- 9 -

5.14 Under the project, UNDP was to provide grant facilities to fund a total of 1,122staff-months of technical assistance, including 64 staff-months of foreign and 1,058 staff-monthsof local consultants, for the identification of 36 subprojects, preparation of feasibility studies andengineering designs of 20 subprojects, monitoring of construction of 27 subprojects, preparationof O&M manuals for 27 subprojects, planning and execution of the pilot O&M programme andthe evaluation of project impact. The UNDP grant facility became effective in March 1985 tofund the technical assistance during February 1985-June 1990 but was extended to June 1991 tocover the increased technical assistance required for the increased preparation works resultingfrom the increased areas of subprojects and for monitoring of construction during the extendedimplementation period. The total grant was, therefore, increased from the original amount ofUS$2.0 million to US$2.47 million. Further, the technical assistance needs from July 1991 toFebruary 1992, amounting to US$88,555 million, were financed under the IDA Fifth TechnicalAssistance Project (Cr. 1440-BD).

5.15 The performance of the consultants was in general satisfactory. The preparationworks were completed on time and quality was good. The monitoring of construction andtechnical advice on quality of works were adequate and helpful for project implementation.During 1985-1992, a total of 1,620 staff-months of consulting services including 72 staff-monthsof foreign and 1,548 staff-months of local consulting services were utilized. The activitiesperformed by these consultants included identification of 36 subprojects, preparation offeasibility studies of 18 subprojects, engineering designs of 18 subprojects, monitoring ofconstruction of subprojects, preparation of O&M manuals for 13 subprojects, preparation ofO&M work plans for four O&M divisions, completion of the socio-economic bench marksurveys in 6 subprojects and women in development and environmental bench mark surveys in5 subprojects (Annex 1, Table 4 ).

5.16 Training. UNDP also provided funds for the training of BWDB's projectpersonnel, including workshops, seminars, study tours to similar projects, short and long-termoverseas training. The actual training programme included: (i) two regional seminars organizedduring Sept-Oct 1989 for 106 BWDB's field personnel on survey and investigation, engineeringdesign and supervision of construction; (ii) an 8-week training course at the Asian Institute ofTechnology (AIT), Bangkok, during 1987-1989 for 13 participants in planning and design ofsmall scale water resources development projects; and (iii) an 11-month post graduate diplomacourses at AIT during 1988-1989 for 5 participants. Although the third seminar was planned,it was initially delayed by the 1991 flood and eventually not organized due to shortage of grantfunds. The number of participants attending the regional seminar were substantially lower thanthe original plan due to weak responses from the BWDB field divisions. Due to UNDP's limitedfunds, the number of personnel attending the overseas training courses were also lower, and notraining in management and planning for senior and middle-level staff was conducted. Theseminars were found satisfactory and useful for project design and implementation of small scalesubprojects. However, due to lack of evaluation reports on use made of the training byrecipients, the effectiveness of the overseas training can not be assessed.

- 10 -

5.17 Project Expenditures. The actual total project costs in Taka are estimated atTk 2,059.72 million, or 42% higher than the appraisal estimates of Tk 1,449.83 million (PartIII/5A). However, due to substantial depreciation of the Taka against the US dollar, totalproject costs in US dollar equivalent are US$59.52 million, only 3% higher than the appraisalestimates of US$58 million.

6. Project Results

6.1 Project Objectives. The project has largely achieved its principal objective ofincreasing crop production in the areas of the 17 subprojects constructed during the projectperiod. In terms of physical targets, albeit with serious implementation delays, the project hascompleted 17 subprojects, 63% of the appraisal target of 27, but the total benefited areasincreased by 18%, from 91,125 ha to 107,789 ha. However, as noted in paras 5.8-5.9, theproject had very limited impact in introducing the improved O&M of subprojects and in creatingawareness for O&M among beneficiaries. It could not initiate the intended nationwide O&Mprogramme for all BWDB's completed schemes through the implementation of a pilotdecentralized O&M programme. Work toward this goal is continuing under the ongoingSystems Rehabilitation Project.

6.2 Project Benefits. The increased food crop production in the project is estimatedat 184,400 tons annually at full development, 68 % higher than the appraisal estimates of 109,500tons. The larger benefited areas and the higher incremental yields of paddy (mainly aus, amanand boro) are the main contributing factors. The total areas benefiting from 17 subprojectincreased from about 91,125 ha estimated at appraisal to about 107,789 ha at project completion.The total areas benefiting from the 15 FCD subprojects increased by 27% from about 81,405ha to about 103,652 ha. However, due to the reduction of the irrigation subprojects from theoriginal 5 to 2 and the substantially reduced service area in the Halda Extension subproject, totalareas benefiting from the two irrigation subprojects fell by 57% from 9,720 ha to about 4,137ha (1,037 ha in the Chenchuri Beel and 3,100 ha in the Halda Extension).

6.3 The estimated crop production in Without Project (WOP) and With Project (WP)situations are based on the limited data from the bench mark surveys, crop data provided by theDepartment of Agriculture Extension (DAE) and additional interviews with farmers outside andwithin the five subprojects5 by the PCR mission. Based on this data, cropping intensities inthese selected subproject areas have increased by 20%-40% and yields of paddy by 10%-50%(10%-15% in FCD and 30%-50% in irrigation subprojects) compared with the appraisalestimates of 25%-30% and 10% respectively. The project's flood protection and improveddrainage have encouraged farmers to adopt irnproved farming practices, including shifts frombroadcasting to transplanting paddy, use of HYV, the increased input use and an expansion ofdry season cultivation.

6.4 Economic Rate of Return. As presented in Part III/6B and Annex 2, the economicrates of return (ERRs) were re-estimated for S of the 17 subprojects and extrapolated for thetotal project. The ERRs were estimated at about 18%-30% for four subprojects (Kangsha FCD,Bighai FC, Kalaroa drainage and Chenchuri Beel irrigation) and 25.2% for the whole project

5. Kangsha River FCD, Bighai River FC, Kalaroa drainage Chenchuri Beel and Halda Extension irrigation.

- 11 -

compared with the appraisal estimate of 21 % -40% and 30% respectively. The lower ERRs aredue mainly to substantially longer implementation period resulting in delayed accrual of benefitsand lower prices of outputs than anticipated at project appraisal. Due to higher investment andO&M costs and smaller service area, the re-estimated ERR of the Halda Extension subprojectis 12%.

6.5 Income Effects. The project works have helped to raise the net farn income offarmers in the subproject areas. Farm budget analyses (Part III/6C and Annex 2) show that atfull development, net farm income for 3000 farms would increase by 35% for FCD subprojectsand 170% for irrigation subprojects over the without project situation. The re-estimatedincremental annual net farm incomes from 3 acre owner-operator farms, expressed in 1994constant prices would be Tk 8,000-Tk 36,000, reflecting real increases of 37%-170% above theappraisal estimates (adjusted to 1994 constant prices). The project has directly benefitted about92,300 farm families, 15 % higher than the appraisal estimates.

6.6 Environmental Impact. Based on the results of the bench mark surveys on theenvironmental aspects conducted in 1992 in 5 subprojects6, no detrimental effects to theenvironment were observed in the subproject areas. In fact, the subprojects have helped inincreasing incomes of landless people and destitute women and improving living conditions offarmers in the subproject areas. However, some minor adverse impacts were observed onfisheries, navigation and flooding in adjacent areas.

6.7 Irrigation Water Charges. A covenant for full O&M cost recovery on BWDB'sgravity irrigation systems, to be attained on a phased basis by 1990, did not achieve itsanticipated results. The SAR for the Systems Rehabilitation Project (Credit 2099-BD) noted thatthe system for assessment and collection of water charges is cumbersome and overly staff-intensive and that reliability of irrigation supply must be upgraded in many projects before waterrates can be effectively collected. A program to improve collections, using simplified systems,in selected projects with satisfactory irrigation services, is being implemented under Credit 2099.Performance remains unsatisfactory, but attempts to improve cost recovery are in process.

7. Project Sustainabilitv

7.1 The sustainability of project operations will depend on the priority given byGOB/BWDB to improving O&M performance and the level of beneficiary participation achievedin undertaking preventive maintenance. The poor performance in these fields during projectimplementation indicates severe risks to the sustainability of the completed infrastructure. Bythe end of the project, BWDB had initiated beneficiary participation through motivationalmeetings, but efforts were still at a preliminary stage. Improving the O&M of all completedsubprojects, including the 17 subprojects completed under this project, and introducingbeneficiary participation in preventive maintenance are major objectives of the ongoing BWDBSystems Rehabilitation Project (SRP) financed in part by Cr. 2099-BD, with co-financing fromthe European Union, Government of Netherlands and the World Food Program. While therehave been some notable improvements (expenditures on O&M has quadrupled from FY89 toFY94), progress to date under SRP on institutional issues has been less than expected. Workis continuing, however, and there is still time to make these efforts successful. The

6. Kangsha, Kalaroa, Bighai, Polder 39/1A and sutki sub-projects.

- 12 -

Government has been informed that demonstrating that existing infrastructure is being operatedand maintained on a sustainable basis will be crucial to IDA ability to consider future watercontrol projects in Bangladesh.

8. Bank Performance

8.1 Through the project cycle, IDA's perfornance was generally satisfactory. Theproject was well defined and the SAR provided the required framework and guidelines forproject implementation. However, project implementation and operation of subprojects sufferedfrom some shortcomings in project design which included: (i) the appraisal mission wasoptimistic in fixing a construction programme of 27 subprojects over an implementation periodof 5 years without giving due weight to Government's cumbersome procedures for thecompletion of pre-construction activities and funding constraints; (ii) the economic viability ofsubprojects agreed after appraisal did not appear to have been checked as thoroughly as thesubprojects reviewed at appraisal; (iii) unanticipated hydromorphological changes resulted in theerosion of some completed infrastructure in the Bighai subproject and high O&M costs fordesilting in the Kalaroa subproject (para 4.3); and (iv) the reliance on consultants to recommendthe institutional arrangements for beneficiaries' O&M responsibilities during projectimplementation gave IDA less leverage for ensuring that these arrangements are actually carriedout than if the establishment of these arrangements had been a condition of lending.

8.2 During implementation period, IDA's supervision missions made positivecontributions to the physical and institutional development of the project. It helped in promptresolution of project implementation issues which enabled BWDB to complete the constructionprogramme of 17 subprojects. Regular field visits were made and advice was sound, particularlyon quality of construction works and the needs for rehabilitation, regular O&M of subprojectsand beneficiaries' participation. When the project implementation was seriously delayed, IDAwas flexible and helpful to re-structure the scope of the project and re-schedule itsimplementation period. However, despite persistent follow-up and pressures exerted by IDA,GOB/BWDB failed to comply with the Credit covenants and conditions for the Credit extensionsin implementing the two O&M components (O&M of subprojects and the pilot O&Mprogramme), the transfer of O&M responsibilities to PCs and beneficiaries.

8.3 The main lessons of experience that may be relevant to IDA are: (a) to ensuretimely and successful project implementation, it is essential to tailor the construction programmeto the practical resources of the Government with prudent allowance for the time required forthe completion of pre-construction activities; (b) the design of subprojects should be reviewedcarefully to ensure adequate account is taken of possible hydromorphological changes in locatingmajor structures at the appropriate sites, so as to avoid/minimize erosion of the completedinfrastructures and unnecessary high O&M costs which might arise after construction; (iii) theeconomic viability of subprojects approved after appraisal should be reviewed with the samethoroughness as subprojects checked during appraisal; and (iv) the successful implementation ofimproved O&M of subprojects and the transfer of the preventive maintenance to beneficiariesrequire a strong commitment from the Borrower/BWDB, the organization of beneficiaries insmaller and manageable groups and clear institutional arrangements for beneficiaries' O&Mresponsibilities.

- 13 -

9. Borrower Performance

9.1 The performance of the Borrower/BWDB in carrying out its obligations was belowexpectations. The chief weakness was the persistent failure in timely acquisition of land forconstruction and adequate provision of counterpart funds when required. This was perhaps dueto overoptimism at appraisal, the Government's cumbersome procedures and inadequatecompensation provided for land acquisition, and the difficult budgetary position at that time.The irregular meetings of DPEC and its insufficient attention to resolving the implementationissues as well as weak project coordination and management were factors contributing to furtherdelays in project implementation. Another institutional weakness in BWDB is the lack ofinitiative and commitment to O&M works. However, there were some improvements towardsthe end of project implementation period when efforts were concentrated in organizingmotivational meetings and forming smaller and more manageable sluice committees. These havenot met with much success mainly due to the limited number of motivational meetings and lackof clear institutional arrangements for beneficiaries' O&M responsibilities. The audited accountsand reports were often submitted late.

9.2 The main lessons of experience for the Borrower are: (i) it is important atappraisal/negotiations for the Borrower to accept only such projects as are within its funding andmanagerial capacities; shortage of funds and poor project management severely delayed projectimplementation and affected overall progress of the present project; (ii) timely completion ofpre-construction activities can be ensured by an effective project management with strongsupport from the inter-agency coordination committee to resolve implementation issues amongdifferent agencies; and (iii) it is essential for GOB/BWDB to fulfil its commitment in carryingout regular O&M with more responsibilities borne by beneficiaries, without which theinvestments would be lost and benefits not sustained.

10. Project Relationship

10.1 The relationship between IDA and the Borrower was satisfactory throughout theproject period. This was particularly important in successfully manoeuvering the project throughtimes of severe delays. IDA/Borrower relationship with UNDP was also satisfactory,particularly UNDP's flexibility in increasing technical assistance funds during the extendedproject implementation period.

11. Consulting Services

11.1 As noted in paras 5.15, services rendered by the consultants financed by UNDPgrant was generally satisfactory. However, some weaknesses in their proposed O&M plans arenoted in para 5. 11.

- 14 -

11.2 Civil works were always completed late due to late calling of tenders and award ofcontracts, difficulties in management of numerous small reaches and award of concrete worksto inexperienced contractors. These factors resulted in many contracts being terminated and thesubsequent delays in re-tendering and fresh awards. It was further adversely affected by the latedistribution of equipment. GOB subsequently introduced contracts on a turnkey basis in 1989,under which contractors had to supply their own equipment and other resources, in an attemptto improve efficiency of contractors and to avoid delays in supply by BWDB. However,implementation of these new procedures encountered difficulties. BWDB did not have thecapacity to test building materials from many small contractors. Furthermore the smallconractors employed did not have sufficient capital to advance for materials which absorb at least60% of the tender sum. (This may indicate that contract sizes were too small to attract moresubstantial contractors and that there were inadequacies in prequalification of contractors'financial capacity.)

12. Project Documentation and Data

12.1 The SAR and the Development Credit Agreement provided a satisfactory overallimplementation framework for IDA, Borrower and BWDB. The feasibility studies of foursubprojects provided sufficient data for the project appraisal. Project documentation duringimplementation which comprised the feasibility studies and engineering designs of 17 subprojectswere sufficiently detailed to ensure effective implementation. The portfolio of subprojects forimplementation was reduced initially to 19 and eventually 17 due to funding and timingconstraints as well as low economic viability of one scheme. However, constraints of landacquisition and the delays on other pre-construction activities reduced the usefulness of theappraisal target projections.

12.2 The progress reports on physical and financial achievements of subprojects provideda good basis for the preparation of the PCR. However, accounts were not kept in sufficientdetail to allow realistic comparison with the appraisal estimates and to provide actual status ofthe subprojects, since separate accounts were not maintained according to either projectcomponents or expenditure categories. Also, information is insufficient for a fully satisfactoryassessment of the project impact, as no post-evaluation studied have been conducted. However,the six socio-economic bench mark surveys, crop data provided by DAE and additionalinterviews with farmers by the mission in five subproject areas served as basis for the financialand economic re-evaluation in the PCR.

- 15 -


BANGLADESH



PART II: PROJECT REVIEW FROM BORROWER'S PERSPECTIVE

1. Bank Performance

Supervision of World Bank, RMB, Dhaka was excellent, particularly theirsuggestion regarding O&M activities, training, quality control, etc. encouraged BWDBpersonnel.

2. Borrowers Performance

Delay in project implementation may be attributed mainly to land acquisition andsecondly late release of fund. There are some minor causes also such as revision of design,procurement of equipments, etc. Such short-comings will be taken care of in future.

3. Relation between the Bank and the Borrower

Relationship between BWDB and World Bank, RMB, Dhaka was good andcooperative.

4. Performance of Co-financiers

There was a Co-financier in IDA Aided Subproject namely UNDP, (TA GrantBGD/84/011). Relationship between BWDB and UNDP was satisfactory.

- 16 -


BANGLADESH



PART m: STATISTICAL INFORMATION

1. Related IDA Credits

Credit No. Title Year of StatusApproval

Cr. 340-BD Chanpur Irrigation n Project 1972 Closed

Cr. 864-BD Drainage & Flood Control Project 1978 Closed

Cr. 955-BD Small Scale Drainage & Flood Control Project 1979 Closed

Cr. 1184-BD Drainage & Flood Control n1 Project 1981 Closed

Cr. 1587-BD Flood Rehabilitation Project 1985 Closed

Cr. 1591-BD Third Flood Control & Drainage Project 1985 Closed

Cr. 1784-BD Fourth Flood Control & Drainage Project 1987 Closed

Cr. 1870-BD Small Scale Flood Control, Drainage and Irrigation n Project 1988 Closed

Cr. 1876-BD Second Flood Rehabilitation Project 1988 Closed

Cr. 2048-BD Third Flood Rehabilitation Project 1989 Closed

Cr.2099-BD BWDB Systems Rehabilitation Project 1990 In Progress

- 17 -

2. Project Timetable

Item Date Planned Date Revised Date Actual

Preparation a/ 1982-1983

Appraisal June 1983

Negotiations February 1984

Board Approval May 1, 1984

Credit Signature May 18, 1984

Credit Effectiveness b- August 16, 1984 November'84, March'85 April 16, 1985

Project Completion June 30, 1989 June '90, June '91, June '92, October 31, 1993June '93

Credit Closing December 31, 1989 Dec. '90, Dec. '91, Dec.' 92, June 30, 19932June '93

a/ Preparation of feasibility reports of four subprojects for appraisal, including Kangsha River FloodControl and Drainage, Kalaroa Drainage, Bighai River Flood Control and North Chenchuri BeelIrrigation subprojects, financed under the IDA Fourth Technical Assistance Project (Cr. 1124-BD).

b! Date of planned Credit effectiveness was postponed due to delays in the acquisition of land and thecompletion of the engineering designs of subprojects scheduled for the implementation in the firstfinancial year.

9 Closing Date was maintained at December 31, 1992 except for the coastal embankment rehabilitationworks added to the Credit after the April 1991 Cyclone, and one equipment contract.

3. Credit Disbursements (SDR million)

FY85 FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94

Appraisal Estimate 4.20 13.60 23.60 32.90 38.90 40.20 40.20 40.20 40.20 40.20

Actual 2.93 3.39 5.33 7.88 12.61 16.46 19.06 24.77 39.26 40.15

Actual as % of 70 25 23 24 32 41 47 62 98 100Appraisal Estimate

Date of Final Disbursement: November 2, 1993.

Comments: Total disbursements were SDR 40.15 million, including SDR 9.22 million for the rehabilitation of the coastal embankments andSDR 5.27 million for the rehabilitation of 26 completed schemes not financed under the project.Due mainly to substantial depreciation of US dollar against SDR, total disbursements in US dollar terms increased to 53.43 million.

- 18 -

4. Project Implementation

Key Indicators (June 1993)SAR Actual Actual as %

of SAR

Land Acquisition (ha) 1,639!f 1,120 u 68Civil Works:- No. Subprojects 27 17 63- Benefitted Area (ha) 91,125 105,089 115FCD:- No. Subprojects 8 8 100- Benefitted Area (ha) 25,920 44,404 171Drainage:No. Subprojects 8 1 13- No. Subprojects 31,590 12,270 39- Benefined Area (ha)FC:

- No. Subprojects 6 6 100- Benefitted Area (ha) 23,895 46,978 197Irrigation:- No. Subprojects 5 2 40- Benefited Area (ha) 9,720 4,137 43Vehicles (No.) 243 94 ' 39Equipment (No.) 219 135 f' 62No. Subprojects under Pilot O&M " 26 fTechnical Assistance (staff-months): 1,122 1,620 144- Foreign Consultants 64 72 113- Local Consultants 1,058 1,548 146Polder Committees (No.) 27 17 63

3' Total land required for 17 subprojects estimated from the engineering designs but after the reduction in scope of 3 subprojects (HaldaExtension, Tarial Pachuria and Gangajhuri).

f Total land possession received at project closure in June 1993. The remaining 519 ha have already been acquired through localarrangements, under which landowners agreed and surrendered land for conatruction to BWDB with assurance that land compensationwill be made after completion of official formalities at the DC offices.

f Reduced number of vehicle and equipment due to GOB's restriction on import and an introduction in 1989 of contracts on a turn keybasis, under which contractors have to supply their own equipment and other resources.

dJ Not specified at appraisal.f Funds were utilized for rehabilitation/rectification works of 26 completed schemes not financed under the project.

- 19

5. Project Costs and Financing

A. Project CostsAppraisal Actual]Estimate a! Esti;mate b/

(Tk million) (IUS$ million) (Tk million) (USS million)

Investigations and Surveys 10.08 0.40 14.86 0.45

Land Acquisition 182.()1 7.32 183.78 5.37

Civil Works:

- 19 Subprojects 675 31) 27.01 1,022.73 29.63

Equipment 8') 37 3.58 183.34 4.94

Operation and Maintenanice:

- Subprojects 71.11 2.84 15.75 0.41

- Pilot Programme 275.1(1 11.00 296.68 9.33

Engineering & Administration 88.82 3.56 188.20 5.50

Technical Assistance & Training 57 14 2.30 101.57 2.56

Food For Works Programme (FFWP) 52.81 1.33

Total Costs 1,449.83 58.00 2,059.72 59.52

Including physical and contingencies.Excluding the costs of about Tk 482.00 million (US$12.63 million) for the rehabilitation of the cyclone damaged coastalembankments.

Contnents: The actual total project costs are estimated at Tk 2,059.72 million (Annex 1, Table 5), including Tk 296.68 million (US$9.33million) for the rehabilitation/rectification of 26 completed schemes not financed under the project, Tk 52.81 million for earthworks financedunder FFWP and FY94 ADP allocations of T'k 132.50 million, including Tk 19.15 million for completion of the rectification works of 8subprojects, Tk 100.10 million for the installation of pumps in the Halda Extension subprojects and Tk 13.25 million for engineering andadministration. Excluding the costs for rehabilitation of 26 schemes (Tk 296.68 million), the construction costs of the Madhabpur and Perizpur-Hizalgachi subprojects dropped during implementation (about Tk 3.13 million, US$0.09 million), the costs of technical assistance for thepreparation of feasibilities studies and designs of subprojeces not implemented under the project and the preparation of O&M works plans underthe pilot O&M programme (about Tk 24.77 million, U rS$0.64 million) and the procurement of equipment for the pilot O&M progranmne (Tk 6.8million, US$0.18 million), the actual total costs of the 17 subprojects are about Tk 1,728.34 million, 54% higher than the appraisal estimatesof Tk 1120.00 million. The cost overrun was due mainly to the significant increases in the unit cost of land acquisition, construction works,and the delayed construction programme resulting in the substantial increases in the overhead costs (engineering and administration) and thetechnical assistance required for monitoring of the construction programme. However, in US dollar terms, due to substantial depreciation ofthe Bangladesh Taka against the US dollar during the project implementation period, total costs of 17 subprojects are about $49.28 million, or10% higher than the appraisal estimates of US$44.80 million. Expressed in FY94 Taka constant terms, total costs of 17 subprojects areTk 2043.29 million, or 5% higher than the appraisal estimates of Tk 1954.40 million (Annex 2, Table 17).

B. Project Financing (US$ million)

Planned Final

UNDP 2.00 2.47IDA 41.50 53.431aFarmers' Contributions 3.20 yGOB 11.30 16.25Total 58.00 72.15 1'

Notes: UNDP grant fund covered the technical assistance and training, while farmers' contributions included on-farm ditches and drains.

a/ Including US$12.63 million (SDR 9.22 million) allocated from the Credit savings for the rehabilitation of the coastal

embankments, about US$7.00 million (SDR 5.27 million) utilized for the rehabilitation of 26 completed schemes disbursedunder the pilot O&M component.

b/Data on farmers actual costs for on-farm irrigation ditches and drains are not available.c/ Total project costs included US$12.63 for the rehabilitation of the coastal embankments, US$9.33 million for the rehabilitation

of 26 othet completed schemes and US$1.33 million financed under FFWP.

- 20 -

6. Project Results

A. Direct Benefits

Appraia Actual/EsFimate PCR Fstimate

Benefitted Area (ha) 91,125 107,789

Incremental Production (tonlyear) 109,500 184,400

No. of Farm Families 80,000 92,300

IncrementaI Farm Employment (staff-days, million) 5.9 4.0

f' In FY94 constant prices.

B. Economic Impact

ERR (%) Appraisal Fsimate PCR Estimate

- Subprojects f' 21-40 12-30

- Whole Project v 30 25.2

Assumptions:

- Project Life (years) 30 30

- Standard Conversion Factor 0.83 0.83

f Kangsha FCD, Kalaroa drainage, Bighai FC and Chenchuri Beel irrigation.v At appraisal, ERR of the whole project was extrapolated based on ERRs of four subprojeets. The same extrapolation asnumptions plus

the results of an analysis of the Halda Irrigation Project were used in the PCR.

C. Financial Impact

Incremental Annsal Net Farm lncomes-3 acre farms (Tk)1 Apprais PCREstimate Estimate

FCD 5,850 8,000Irrigation 13,140 36,000

11 FY94 Constant prices.

D. Studies

Not Applicable

- 21 -

7. Status of Covenants

Section Status f Oziginal Revised Description of Covenant CommentsDCA Date Date

3.01 (a) OKI The Borrower shall carry out the project Project implementation seriouslythrough BWDB with due diligence and delayed due to inadequate GOB fundsefficiently in conformity with appropriate up to 1990, untimely land acquisitionadministrative, financial and engineering and weak project coordination andpractices and provide promptly as needed management. Procurement ofthe funds, facilities, service and other equipment was held up due to delaysresources required for the purposes. in the evaluation process by BWDB.

3.03 OK January 1, 1985 Selection of subprojects and appointment -

of implementing consultant.

3.04(c) OK April 1, 1985 Furnish plan for monitoring the benefits Delayed by one year as consultant onand evaluation of impact. UNDP grant funds was appointed in

February 1986.

3.06 OKI Sufficiently in Acquire land as and when required. Serious delays due to the lengthy andadvance of cumbersome land acquisitionconstruction procedures, inadequate funding andrequired. lack of foUow-up by staff of BWDB at

DC offices and by DPS m atML&LR.

3.08 OKI January 1, 1985 for Work programme and staff requirements O&M proposals for 4 divisions1 division and July for the pilot O&M programme. received and work plans prepared by1, 1985 for the consultants in 1986 but notremaining 3 implemented.divisions.

4.01 (c) OK Within 9 months Audit reports. Audit reports were often submittedafter end of fiscal with delays.year.

4.02 (b) NC January 1, 1986. Submit proposal for transferring O&M No proposal has yet been preparedresponsibilities to PCs. even at project closure. This covenant

has subsequently been removed fromthis Credit, and it is being pursuedunder the on-going SystemsRehabilitation Project (Cr. 2099-BD).

4.03 NC Collection of water Water charges recovery. No water charges have yet beenrates at 30% by implemented. This covenant has1986, 67% by 1988 subsequently been removed from thisand 100% by 1990. Credit, and it is being pursued under

the ongoing Systems RehabilitationProject (Cr. 2099-BD) under which aatudy is being carried out at theKarnafuri Irrigation Project byconsultants.

OK =Covenant complied with.OK1 =Partial compliance.NC -Not complied.

- 22 -

8. IJse of Bank Resources

A. Staff Inputs(Staff Weeks)

TIk LENP LENA LENN SPN Total

Pte-FY82 1.S 1.8

FY32 5.6 5.6

FY33 7.7 15.9 23.7

FY34 44.5 4.9 2.9 52.3

FY85 19.0 19.0

FY36 2S.3 28.3

FY37 27.0 27.0

FY33 18.3 13.3

FY89 11.2 11.2

FY90 18.4 18.4

FY91 15.0 15.0

FY92 20.3 20.3

FY93 15.9 15.9

FY94 14.6 f 14.6

Todal 15.1 60.4 4.9 190.9 2713

Y lncluding 12.8 staff weeks for PCR.

LENP - Activities prior to appraisal.LENA - Activitis ted to appraisl.LENN - Negotiation activities.SPN - Supervision time.PCR - Project Compntion Report.

- 23 -

B. Missions

Type ofDate No. of Man-days in Specialization Performance Rating Trend Problums

(Month/Year) Sent By Persons Field - F

Preparation f 1982-1983 A B C D

Appraisal 6/83 IDA 4 84 2A,B,E

Supervision

I 10-11/84 IDA 2 4 A,E - - - - -

nI 4/85 IDA 1 10 E 1 2 2 2 2 T,M

HI 10/85 IDA 3 13 2A,D 2 2 2 2 2 F,M

IV 4-5/86 IDA 2 63 A,E 2 1 2 2 1 F,T

V 10-11/86 IDA 2 18 2E 1 2 2 2 2 M

VI 3-4/87 IDA I 10 E 2 3 3 3 2 F,M

VII 11-12/87 IDA 3 75 2E,D 2 2 3 2 2 F,M

vm 4-5/88 IDA 3 75 2E,D 3 3 3 3 3 F,M

ix 11-12/88 IDA 3 60 2E,D 3 3 2 3 3 F,M

X 4/89 IDA 3 48 2E,D 3 2 2 3 2 F,M

Xi 11/89 IDA 3 48 2E,d 2 2 2 2 2 F,M

XII 5/90 IDA 4 68 3E,D 3 2 2 3 3 F,M

xm 11-12/90 IDA 3 72 2E,D 3 2 2 3 3 F,M

XIV 748/91 IDA 3 160 3E,D 2 3 2 2 3 F,M

XV 12/91 IDA 3 60 2E,D 2 3 2 2 3 F,M

XVI 5-6/92 IDA 3 60 3E 1 3 2 2 3 M

xvii 12/92 IDA 3 45 2E,D 1 3 3 3 3 M

XVIII 6-8/93 IDA 3 45 2E,D 1 2 3 3 1 M

f Preparation of feasibility studies of 4 subprojects by Consltants financed under the Fourth Technical Assistance Project (Cr.I 124-BD).' A = Agriculture; B =Economics; C =Programme Officer; D =Disburaement; E = Engineer.f Performance Rating: A = availability of funds; B =project management; C =development impact; D = overall status.

I = Problem-frec or minor problems;2 =Moderate problems;3 =Major problems.

f Trend: I =improving; 2 =stationary; 3 =deteriorating.f Type of problems: F -Financial; T -Technical; M -Management.

C. Costs

Not Available

- 25 -

ANNEX 1

Subproject, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND PROJECT COSTS

CONTENTS

TABLES:

1. Status of Subprojects2.1 and 2.2. Physical Achievements of Subprojects3. Summary Findings of the Operational Status Surveys4. Technical Assistance5.1 and 5.2. Project Actual Costs6. Procurement of Equipment

-26-

Annex 1Table 1

BANGLADESHBWD B Small Schemes Project

(CR 1467 - BD)Project Completon Report

Status of Sub- Projects

Sub-projects Typeol Gross Aea(ha) Net Area (ha) Year Year Constructiom OperationStatus of Land (ha)Subprojects Value Commence Complion duration (yr) Status required possession

received1. Sakuchia Island FCD 4310 3924 5/88 6/91 3.1 FO 228.36 106.232. Kangsha River FCD 11620 9828 3185 6/91 6.3 PO 137.70 135.693. Polder52153 A&B FCO 8030 6440 1t89 6/91 2.4 FO 263.00 24.504.Tarall Pachurla FCD 4150 3161 1/89 6192 3.4 FO 3.11 3.115. Sutid River FCD 810 810 12/85 6/86 0.6 FO 2.02 2.026. Polder56/57 Ext FCD 1520 1430 4/87 6/89 2.2 FO 54.64 32.857. Ganggaihuri FCD 15850 13200 3/87 6/92 5.3 FO 155.89 155.898. Bighai River FC 6900 4858 3/85 6/91 6.3 PO 96.12 95.129. Polder 39/1A FC 11750 9400 5186 6191 5.1 FO 80.00 80.0010. Rahimpui Khal PC 10930 10120 12/87 6/89 1.6 FO 1.81 1.8111. Polder 39/IA FC 5870 4700 3/87 6/89 2.2 FO 27.78 27.7812. Kalisdashkhall-Akpara fC 16150 12170 1/87 6193 6.5 FO 275.00 221.1313. Paisarthat-Ramsil FC 7280 5730 4/87 6192 5.2 FO 142.89 110.8514. Aol Beel D 15750 12270 3/87 6190 3.3 FO 27.00 0.0015. Kalaroa D 8090 5611 2185 6/87 2.5 PO 39.24 19.9516. Chenchtri Beel 1 1335 1037 1/89 6/94 5.5 NO 24.48 24.4817. Halda Extension I 4230 3100 4/88 6/94 6.2 NO 80.06 78.69

Total 134575 107789 1639.10 1120.10

FCD-flood control and drainageFC-flood controlD= drainageI-irrigation

1/ Operation statusas December 1993. FO-iu1993. FO-fully operational: PO-partially operational;NO-not operational

Source: Project management Unit (PMU) PMU)

BANGLADESH8WO SoLiL Sdicrries Proecls

(Cr. 1 467-BD)ProIcCI Conipicilon1 ACp(l

Pliyslcnl Actievcincits Of Sulb-fo)CCIs

DcscrIlpllon Utill SLW-ROILCI Sib-loial

KDlaroa ClhCncltil KInilgsi1 BigIal StAkt Polder RahimpLr Poldcr Kalldash- PolderBccl lwcr Mver Rhvnr 39/1 A KhiI 39/1 C kinll-Npa 66/67 Ext

EARTHWOFI(S- EmbItfnirricnI krn 25.8 22.7 40 15 12.7 11.1 127.3- ClostUe Fno 6 14 5 1 2G- nod Idprovoitnrt krri 0- Dralingc cnrals kin 21.4 6 34 5.8 16.3 92 175.5- krlgnlloticallnls kilt 16.4 164

STRUCTURESllydItullcCsktucItrcsCIFtaInl 305

.nefguLalor no 5 G 8 1 1 1 6 6 1 37

. Fltusing sItLIc no 4 10 30 5 I 50

. Irfloat1o0 cnf%al sIrutcie no 152 152

. Irlgallon 1l cI no 38 16 54

. Oulict saiucitie no 6 5 11Gracc cortrd slrudtrc nK) I t

PuioIp)liK slillon no 2 2Orldkg/cLiveri no 10 13 23

t/ldl3igd no 6 6

EQUIPMENT- Puinps [la 4 4

Soirce: Ptorpess Rcpo Is. PMU.

BANGLADESHBWDB S Scenecs PF o)ccl

I (CR. 1467-BD)Proiecl Comr)lellolflcpoet

Ptryslical Actilevenertls of Sib- Projecis

Ileni Unil Slit)-I) oject Toall Total Acltnt---------------------------------------------------------------…- based on AcILrI as % ofGariqajitxI ArolB ccl PalsarInlt HidnI 1/ Tarail 1/ Poider Sakticli design design

I/ Rafrisil Exicitslon Pachtfila 62/63 IslInd cstiTnIc esitinic

EARTHWORI(S- Emnb:arrient kml 50.6 15.1 53 7 26.5 401 273.2 68- Clostic rio 4 8 9 47 47 100- Rond laiprovemcit km 5.7 25 30.7- DaInage canals kml 124 70 13.6 1.9 42.8 545 428 78- Irrigaton canals kii 16 78 32 42

STRUCTURES- Hydlautlc siruclttrcs In IoIal no 818 784 96

. Reguialor nTo 5 2 4 24 3 7 5 87 1

. Fitsltiln shicc no 3 1 36 90

. IfFIgaIon canal sirucixo no 152lIrigallon file( no 27 44 . 125

. Otillet siriclItc nKo 13 .24

. Gade con0iol stIc1lieC no 1- Pumpirxj slallon no 2 4 4 100- Bldtge/cttvcrl no n 3 4 65 38 58- BLiltilrx no 1 3 4 14

EQUIPIVENT- Pqgrljl) no 6 10

so,icc: n rxjcss neporis. PMU.1/ Reduced In scopc ol works.

-29-

BANGLADESH Annex 1BWDB Srnall Schemes project Table 3

(CR. 1,467-BD)Tae3Project Completion Report

Summary Findings of the Operational Status Surveys (November 1992)…-- - ---- - - - - - --- - - - -…-- - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - --- - - - - - --- - - - - - - -_

Sub-project Description Findings

Polder 39/1A Embankments in poor condition, showing cutsSluices 4 need protective works

9 flapgates damaged. 1 gate missing in S3Closures cut by public at Choto Kathaltali

public obstructionKhals silted-up

Polder 3911C Embankments breached at 3 locationsR/S slopes slided down

Sluices block protection works partly damaged7 flapgates damagedflushing sluices not functioning properly

Khals silted-upSakuchia Island Embankments R/S slopes show damage

Sluices 3 loose aprons damacgedClosures R/S slope of 3 closures shovw damage

Polder 56/17 Embankments damage by wave acti :n over 2.75 kmDrain tail end silted-upSluices scouring u/s and d/s

Polder 52/53 Embankments R/S slope damaged p. l.iyRegulators R/S apron damaged . 5 sluices

flap gates and rubber seals damagedlift gtes damaged in :wo sluices

Biahai Embankments gap of 6.3 km, 2 km cr,oded by shifting channe!16 km partially dama;ec:open at 4 khals

Sluices aprons damaged, sczur holeserosion at 6 sluices

Irrigation canals blocked by roadsPaisarha-Ramsil Embankments need resectioning

public objection against closures at Bova-tia Kha:Regulators loose aprons damaged at 3 regulators

flap gates at 2 regulatorsClosure 1 incompleteDrain congesticn because of lackof link wvith low areas

Kangsha River Drain siltation by approx. 1 mEmbankments side-slopes damaged by wave-action

Gangaihuri Drain only 2.3 km out of 5.4 km completeddrainage congestion in some areas

Old Sutki River Drain silted-upRahimpur Khal Regulators siltation u/s and d/s of structuresHalda Extension Pumping stamions not yet complete

Irrigation system not yet completeChenchuri Beel Pumping stations not yet complete

Irrigation system 5.8 km of canal incompleteKalidashkhafi-Arpara Drains 13.6 km incomplete, obstruction by population

local drainage problemArol Beel Drains 800 ha suffer from drainage problemsKalaroa Sluices 4 out of 5 sluices not functioning properly

because of siltation in Betna River outfall-------.------------------------------------------------------- __

BANGLADESI IOWD0 Sitiall .clenies Ptoject Annox I

(CR. 14G77-B0) Table 4Projoct Compblion roportTochnical Assislanco

Descriplion Number of Sub- projecis Numbor ofman-Months--------------------------------------------------------- __------------------__------------------------

total PrC/EC Prnc Total Fotoign local

SAR aclual actual as actual actual Aclual as% SAIn SAR actual % SAIR SAR actual SAR aclual

IDENTIFICATION 51 51 100 15 36STLD Y

FEASIBIUTY 1/ 35 33 94 15 I1 192 NA 24 NA 168 NASTLUOY

DETAILED DESIGN 2/ 27 25 93 a 17 836 NA 36 NA 800 NA1028 NA 60 66 968 NA

CONSTRUCTION 31 27 19 70 0 19 90 NA 90. NA oMONITORING

O&M MANUALS 27 ii 41 0 11

PILOT O&M 4 6 150 4 6STUDIES (divisions) 4 4 100 0 4

Dench mark Surveys - II 1ITotal 4/ 1122 1620 144 64 72 1058 1548

I/ Two feasibility studies prepared by PRC/ECI wero roviewed by EPC. In addition, Ihl Rahimpur Klial was preparod by BWDB.2/ The dosigns oa tour sub-propcls Inilialed by PRC/ECI were compinlod by EPC.3/ Initially 27 sub-prolocis wore approved by BWDB for implementalion but Iheso woro reducod to 19 sub-projecis In 1987 and evontually to 17 In 1989.4/ Total SAn eslimates did not Included man-montihs of PlC as Ihese were financed under Ihe Fourth Technical Assistanco Projoct,and iho bench mark surveys whiichi wero not eslimated al appraisal. Total aclual was oxcluded man-monihs of PRC.

Hi

Ban)gladeshBWDB Small Scheines Project

(Cr. 1467-BD)Project Coinpiltion Repoit

Projea Aclual Cosis(Tl( Million)

FY85 FY86 FY07 FY08 FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Total

1.lnvesligalions&Sinvey 0.95 1.90 2.45 1.26 1.34 2.29 1.20 3.39 0.00 0.00 14.062.La-idAculijisiliorn G.B2 10.00 7.56 12.87 18.26 31.56 34.78 30.43 23.50 0.00 183.783.Civil Works 14I.00 35.20 51.56 51.71 149.00 196.03 211 .0 200.96 92.36 19.15 1022.734.EquLipmIcnl0. 0. 0.00 18.60 0.44 6.00 . n.05 20.07 0.32 20.00 100.10 183.345.O&M Cosis-SLib-projects 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 9.9Al 5.5D 0.00 15.75 u

-Pilol Programme 0.00 19.29 63.00 73.70 65.43 63.77 11.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 296.68 '

Sub-tlotal 0.00 19.29 63.00 73.711 65.43 63.77 11.67 9.91 5.58 0.00 312.43

G. Emng.&Admirnisiration 3.28 5.85 27.47 7.50 40.70 10.09 35.91 32.55 10.80 13.25 100.207.TecdumicalAssist.mncc 30.00 21.30 15.47 6.00 2.30 13.22 5.38 3.19 4.71 0.00 101.578.FFWP 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.89 31.92 52.01

Total Costs 55.85 101.62 186.19 161.56 203.91 325.81 321.77 280.75 177.84 164.42 2059.72

Source: Project Maitageitient Unit (PMU)

H 0.Wt -

BANGLADESHBWDB Small Schemes Project

(Cr. 1467-BD)- Project Completion ReportActual Project Costs (Tk Million)

FY85 FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Total

Investigaticn&Survey 0.95 1.90 2.45 1.26 1.34 2.29 1.28 3.39 0.00 0.00 14.86Land Acquisition 6.82 18.00 7.56 12.87 18.26 31.56 34.78 30.43 23.50 0.00 183.78Civil Works1/ 14.72 35.26 50.91 49.33 149.00 196.03 211.88 200.96 92.36 19.15 1019.60

O&M of Sub-projects 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 9.91 5.58 0.00 15.75Eng.&Administration 3.28 5.85 27.47 7.50 40.70 10.89 35.91 32.55 10.80 13.25 188.20Equipment2/ 0.00 0.00 14.95 6.75 5.50 8.05 20.87 0.32 20.00 100.10 176.54FFWP 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.89 31.92 52.81Technical Assistance3/ 20.10 14.27 10.36 4.02 1.55 13.22 5.38 I 3.19 4.71 0.00 76.80

Total 45.87 75.28 113.70 81.73 216.35 262.04 310.36 280.75 177.84 164.42 1728.34 >

Source: Project Management Unit (PMU)

1/ Excluding Perizpur-Hizalgachi and Madhapur sub-projects which were dropped from the implementation in 1989 (Tk3.13 million)2/Estimated at about 80% of total costs of equipment procured during FY87-FY89 to exclude the costs of equipment procured forthe pilot O&M programme.3/ Estimated at about two-thirds of the total costs of technical assistance duwing FY85-FY89 to exclude the costs of thefeasibility study, engineering designs of sub-projects not implemented under the project, and the preparation of O&M warkplans for the pilot O&M programme.

-33-

Annex 1Table 6

* BANGLADESHBWDB Small Schemes Project

(CR. 1467-50)Project Completion Report

Procurement of Equipment

Desaiplion Unit Strengthening BWDB Pilot O&M program

SAR Actual SAR Actual

CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT- Concrete mixer no 40 40- Air Compressors no 3- Vibrating compactor no 8 6- Dewatering pump. generator,compressor no 15 10- Concrete vibrator 1/ no 80- Jetting Pumps 1/ no 4- Well point system 1/ no 4- Generators 1/ no 2TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT- Speedboat no 6 4 17 3- Outboard engine no 0 4 0 6- Truck 2/ no 3- Mlinibus 2/ no 2- Car 2/ no 1- 4 WO vehicle no 10 8 26 11- Pick-up no 8 5- Motor cycle no 30 30 80 23- Bicycle no 60

OFFICE EQUIPMENT- Photocopying macnine no 4 4- Type writer no I2 12- Desion/otfice eauipment itern no 47 63

TOTAL no 263 i7C .3 Total actual as : cf total SAR *. 65 30

1/ cancelled by BWDB, with approva! cl IDA2! No procurement due to GoB's import restric:ions.

- 35 -

ANNEX 2

FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC RE-EVALUATION

CONTENTS

A. Agricultureal Impact

B. Farm Incomes

C. Economic Re-evaluation

TABLES: 1-28

- 36 -

ANNEX 2

FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC RE-EVALUATION

A. AGRICULTURAL IMPACT

1. At appraisal, the increase in agricultural production was quantified from about 91,125ha of crop land, which were affected by flooding and inadequate drainage in the monsoon seasonand lacked irrigation supplies in the dry season. The projected production levels were to beachieved with existing irrigation equipment and without major changes in the availability ofextension advice. Project works were expected to create cropping conditions that wouldencourage beneficiaries to adopt improved farming practices, including shifts from broadcastingto transplanting paddy, use of high yielding varieties (HYV) instead of low yielding paddyvarieties, dry season cultivation, supplemental irrigation during wet season, and the increasedinput use these changes would require. Without the project, only modest production gains wereto be expected, resulting from small yield increases due to extension efforts and farmers' owninitiatives over time to improve their cultivation practices.

2. In flood control and drainage sub-projects, where some irrigation equipment wasalready used, the main impact was to be the introduction of T. Aman (HYV), followed by someexpansion of T. Aus (HYV) and wheat cultivation. In irrigation sub-projects, farmers would beable to start dry season cultivation of Boro and grow T. Aman with supplementary irrigation inthe monsoon season. Cropping intensities were expected to increase by 25 % from 138% atpresent to 163% in flood control and drainage sub-projects, and by 33% from 133% to 166% inirrigated sub-projects. Expected yield increases with the project would be moderate, notexceeding 10% for all crops. Thus, the projected production increases were to result chiefly fromshifts in cropping patterns and higher cropping intensities.

3. Estimates of present, without project (WOP) and with project (WP) crop productionfor the entire project were extrapolations based on the assumption that the unappraised sub-projects were, on average, to produce the same results as the four appraised sub-projects,including Kangsha River Flood Control and Drainage (FCD), Kaloroa Drainage, Bighai RiverFlood Control (FC) and Chenchuri Irrigation sub-projects.

4. Based on the above benefited areas, cropping intensities and yields, annual incrementalproduction at full development (paddy, wheat, jute and oilseeds, etc.) was estimated at about109,500 tons increasing froni 251,200 tons in WOP situation to about 360,700 tons in WPsituation.

5. At project completion, cropping patterns, cropped areas and crop yields in WOP andWP situations of the 5 sub-projects (Kangsha, Kaloroa, Bighai, Chenchuri and Halda Extension),are based on limited data from the socio-economic bench mark surveys, crop data provided byDAE and additional interviews with farmers within and outside these 5 sub-projects conductedby the PCR mission in March 1994. In addition, because the Chenchuri and Halda Extensionsub-projects were then not yet in operation, the crop production WP was based on the agriculturaldevelopment trend of the Kanarfuri Irrigation sub-project financed under the Small Scale FloodControl, Drainage and Irrigation Project (Cr. 1870-BD) and interviews with farmers.

- 37 -

6. The project has completed 17 sub-projects, covering 107,789 ha of net crop land(Annex 1, Table 1) which is 18% higher than the appraisal estimates. The total areas benefitingfrom the 15 FCD sub-projects increased by 27% from about 81,405 ha to about 103,652 ha.However, due to the reduction of the irrigation sub-projects from the original 5 to 2 and thesubstantially reduced service area in the Halda Extension sub-project, total areas benefiting fromthe two irrigation sub-projects reduced by 57 % from 9,720 ha to about 4,137 ha (1,037 ha in theChenchuri Beel and 3,100 ha in the Halda Extension). The cropping intensities have increasedby 23%-36% from 146%-155% in WOP to 169%-191% in WP in the 3 FCD sub-projects, andby 40% from 160% in WOP to 200% in the 2 irrigation sub-projects (Annex 2, 18-22). Overallyields of paddy have increased by 10%-50%, ranging from 10%-15% in FCD to 30%-50% inirrigation sub-projects (Annex 2, Tables 1-4).

7. Based on the above benefited areas, cropping intensities and yields, annual incrementalproduction at full development (paddy, wheat, jute and oilseeds, etc.) is estimated at about184,400 tons representing an increase from 760,600 tons in WOP situation to about 945,000 tonsin WP situation. The higher incremental food production is due mainly to the larger crop areaand higher incremental yields of paddy.

B. FARM INCOMES

8. At appraisal, the impact of the project on farm incomes has been analyzed for two 3-acre owner-operator farms, to reflect the impact of the flood control and drainage sub-projectsand irrigation sub-projects. Based on the assumed per ha financial crop budgets in WOP and WPsituations, cropping patterns and crop budgets in Annex 5.2, Tables 1-4 of the SAR, expressedin FY'84 constant value, annual net farm income were estimated to increase by about 28% fromTk 11,580 in WOP to Tk 14,830 in WP for the FCD sub-projects, and by 93% from Tk 7,830to Tk 15,130 for the irrigation sub-projects. Re-stated in FY'94 constant prices, incrementalannual net farm incomes would have been Tk 5,850 and Tk 13,140 respectively.

9. The effect of the project on farm incomes have been re-estimated for the two 3-acreowner-operator farms. The per ha financial crop budgets in WOP and WP situations for the FCDand irrigation sub-projects are shown in Annex 2, Tables 1-4 and the cropping patterns of 3-acrefarms in Annex 2, Tables 6-7. The irrigation costs in WOP and WP have been based on theaverage irrigation costs of low lift pump and shallow tube well as shown in Annex 2, Tables 9-10. Based on the above assumptions, annual net farm incomes at full development from 3-acreowner-operator farms are re-estimated to increase by 35% from about Tk 22,850 in WOP toTk 30,850 in WP for the FCD sub-projects, and by 170% from Tk 21,000 to Tk 57,000 for theirrigation sub-projects. The estimated incremental annual farm incomes of the two farms areTk 8,000-Tk 36,000, reflecting real increases of 37%-170% over the appraisal estimates.

C. ECONOMIC RE-EVALUATION

10. At appraisal, the economic rates of return (ERRs) undertaken in FY'84 constant priceswere estimated at 21 % -40% for 4 sub-projects (35 % for Kangsha FCD, 40% Kalaroa drainage,26% for Bighai FC and 21% for Chenchuri irrigation) and 30% for the whole project. Thefollowing assumptions were used in the analysis:

- project life of 30 years, including a construction period of 2 years;

- 38 -

economic farm-gate prices of paddy, wheat, jute, oilseeds and fertilizers werebased on average projected 1985, 1990 and 1995 world market prices expressedin FY'84 constant prices;

prices of non-traded goods and services were adjusted by a Standard ConversionFactor (SCF) of 0.83;

all project's investment costs, excluding the pilot decentralized O&Mprogramme, were included in the analysis;

the development of irrigated areas in FCD sub-projects has been assumed to beachieved with existing irrigation equipment;

total net cultivated area of 91,125 ha for the whole project; and

extrapolations of the combined ERRs of the four appraised sub-projects wereused as a basis for the calculation of ERR of the whole project.

11. The PCR re-evaluation of the project's ERRs follows the appraisal assumptions. Themain differences are:

the average construction period of 5 years within the project life of 30 years;

actual project costs by sub-projects have been restated in FY'94 constant prices,using GDP deflator indices for local costs and MWV index for foreign exchangecomponent (Annex 2, Table 17) and adjusted into border prices by using SCF0.83. Total investment costs of the project and sub-projects excluded therehabilitation costs of 26 completed schemes utilizing funds from the pilotO&M programme, the costs of equipment procured for the pilot O&Mprogramme, and technical assistance for the preparation of feasibility studies anddesigns of sub-projects not financed under the project and the O&M work plansfor four pilot division;

average FY'90-FY'95 projected world market prices of rice, wheat, oilseeds,jute, sugar cane and fertilizers expressed in FY'94 constant value were used inthe analysis (Annex 2, Table 8). A summary of economic prices of outputs andinputs is presented in Annex 2, Table 5;

per ha economic crop budgets in WOP and WP situations are presented i nAnnex 2, Tables 13-14 for FCD sub-projects and Tables 15-16 for the inio6sub-projects;

total net cultivated areas of 107,789 ha for the whole project; and

additional financial cost of Tk 44.6 million estimated by BWDB for completionof the remaining works of Halda sub-project;

- 39 -

extrapolation of the combined ERRs of the 3 FCD sub-projects, the Chenchuriand Halda Extension sub-projects were used as a basis for the calculation ofERR of the whole project.

12. On this basis, the ERRs are re-estimated at 17%-30% for 4 sub-projects (18% forChenchuri, 17% for Bighai, 19% for Kangsha and 30% for Kalaroa) and 25.2% for the wholeproject Annex 2, Tables 23-26, 28. The lower ERRs are due mainly to substantially longerimplementation period resulting in delayed accrual of project benefits and lower prices of outputsthan anticipated at project appraisal. Due to higher investment and O&M costs and smallerservice area, the re-estimated ERR of the Halda Extension sub-project is 12% (Annex 2, Table27).

- 40 -

EN EhIEfii 19 §I~3 Table 1

47! ii U l Ullafl=2!!i

I~~

j 1::32--:32s_-,2332!

i 1!I232SUiS:Y_:'

I i a~~~~~~~

Pa~.........

- IZt *z; i3"ig

-} §- 4 sS1^ ai_.§fel§ i

i 5 sw----t

15 *u22aa a!.i.a3RtlXS i

II __ :.. _.___ X

I I i sfl!iIIII!SslSa

-44

1308VIIt01 11 01 It Om1 06 *It0 I 13 1 I 3 1 3 WWV 813 13 443M'*

M t tI

ties W II II 30 01 1 00 tl II 160 tet a I631,ot n kI00 I 1 6 60 11 Witl 6 0131 6Ito on3 1Ks II Oml 334 Jr VP 4013 SW OI I I 0 0 0 All018 14 0011 *m 00113 6 11 4lOll 331 101 1310 1ff I 10 130 II 13~~~~~~~~~~~~~' I 0 0 I I et 0 13 1 ll 111 "s I W Stu et: It "Mf 03 it to"8 to* WICCC Ct 6* Cl Om008 130 **3 I8 331A00 II 03 11 31 11 0 0 013 L I0 6 I 4 1 3 3 18 I l 1131 131 a33 16 W "an1 31 its jIts 03a 33 3 0 Nit g a 03 61 31 l "I6 I"1toI I30 1 of Ste a33of 0w110 03630g10 1633, * AA001 Kg8 Ni ela3 0 0I et 4031 10 I.I 133 of 0 0 0 0 a 0 6 II it 308 33 "H31 03NV38et 8I0 lI O0P*1

UK3 Ks3 "at gm1 tot II 38 Kit IC O a 900 1tot3 L I 6OI l 13 3to 0 1 13 31`1 1130 0111 I3 6s3 I 'i0 aJ1138 3f 3at tat INI 01 10 1311 III 11 Mt 6e60 gm1 It K11 t3 3Oa St 01311 011 .1011 II 110 IC "0101* a"3 13 Nit w let of 14, 138 01 "III 3 11 ,0 W I,03 8 3 003 1 11f 18 10 3 3 "3'II111 4 la 3 Nto 030 13 II It 1131 30 31 I 6 a 0 10 0 31 8 8 to t6wo1 "is Coll OR0 CT 3138 181 133 0113 000 II 00 0331 03 331 I 0 0 6 4~~,e I1 .. PI AK1 1t tot0 00 CM1 130o3II it it 4i II Is pd Pd 43 P. P- SI Og 40 OA6 I1 11 13 0A6 II @0 II SI It 0-4n 41 -4,g 40n8a040 R0 hIln l44 1131 11301

,031 1344 lIPI)MA0

060"434 IP*W2 P34*61-001.0 *43I.l04lqI -dP4tw

la4.04 00v1 60001 WV

t,,,,,,qq.>-Xdz svt"t J _rt%Vr*ewP*zt 113_-000l1 4

C-"~~~~~~~~~~~~~

__A X4 e "0 o " . ) -. 4 "-II _

I19 lie tO ItO 0; Ut UsI Mq Mo9 INW 0 MltIK 0 trSg t It .o0n m _ Sn t0 m 'n U 1m t See Ss n s I n90 OK 59 j 01 O n IH"l

11W 00 991 094 WIs SI t tn( 9 1 t l 00 00 CC II 00 K l 900 61 l 09 0101 0 UIC 0 . . t'U*0nnIP 0t 1 110at I0 I 90 I nt Om *n 00 t "I SM t101 MoO 000* Sa t000 9e 005 o9o0.Ktt * t * n tn* U 11 g *"i *e 5e1 9s o5 o * 0 ; 9 U* *it S o lt tl 0 0 9K 0i 9 31 0s9ll 094 Sell WIct ml £9 it Om 09 01 0m to Sol Ci 101 a1 Mo 00 OIM OM 006 5 a9t:91 MI11 lO 090 K 410 K WI SI U 05 Cl It 091 00 US K 101 0610UOtis 9on Ott VIIS I09 90 500 It1 500 S. 0 0 I M 0 90 I 0W 00 10 9 I09list 9 91 11 001 0 0 01 * M tsStUtSwig09i, IHI MMo 9*01 901 0009"at 1 1010 "5 aI P.9

oca * I is nf nu°" a I n 0l t s l .0 Y n t t t ° otnt GUC nat *I nl"

M 11 r oil Oml 00 oI at "a11 a0 ell Mo Ut 9S Om5 9 jI "to9 Ko 1 9 9 cello Col Ca010 I 90 90 00 U 9 0 11 0 01 (I 10 0 *1 It LZ 0I1 au, MO I @101 011 00161 Ma MO 00--1A9SOLO (00 090 KU 009 000 31 00~ 464: (0 It1 100 610 0 9 1( 1 93 5 1 9 le 9 Kl 1 00 1 IOVAtit t 09 000O, KN0001 K 101 0 0 9GO 09 l 909 905 09 1 110f

SO00 IO 0 09 0 0 I 0 00 9 01 0 099 9 00 014 00 313 00 MO K09I1 10 1 0 09 1 I 9 I 0 10 0 9 I9m 101 IS.lOS S0 01 09' 09 10 O m0 51 1 000K 06 0 00 K SI14l9ItI 09 6.9 10 49090 SI1 0- 0ml c to c ii iie P4 P4 KII 9 000 II 00 C 51 CI So ci 6914 S See It .tVI *'I Se I00AIt"091 ldot 11* tol on .4 11041 0* fill Deto110Is'I00 1"i09iz: - '

09*j 11044 .090 100 P" P" it I0't00.p., I-oIl 1,tl qi -o u . t " 0 1P S.4* 09 I .0 1 0 l0 .S I v m n . "w

104W -4-161 01001 A1140w 0spg. 9

Ii

2KI ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ 4tt:l* Att*- _1* :lv gal It,"n to-- lo "I8,1n mO _ 'It Kit A 46 e t9K * M c 1 n un : 04 tP 9 49u4qu lilAOf ufn lufn sol of SO 1108 IS gu tI I "l K IN N m #1 mt out1 0 IL t ' 8

tme I" "a u t a"ot n " ml 6 S I 8 I e II tI 8. tS 9t @8 0 III * d,

- " So "a So S. "" e "I tot a4n oi Oti "to UN, U' u .t|tIII. 681 III 6881 Nt ii 68 wet g mu Ut @18 881 Ii 818 68 sit w m t* Oguu 0 66981 6 OiL *...q.OA

luau mu mu sic,. m~~ ~~~~~us ii p m IN owl ON 868 OK8 go we8 68 N H tN 68G8W 88 864* 6 * 0 9 * 0 4 ~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~*I 8 . . . .0 S "Ile * . .l wopu 1.0 .m ec Itu gu e 68 ut I IIC83 onuIea we Is nu @96 91 66*PCS" tic sit OM1 Om8 I 8 lt I 6 8 u I WI 86-, I0I N 681.81 0" *Ms8 co~tueu e. L unm t g sn n . cu w lIn a lit 61 118 uu St= lNit *Wu8 @98 CS1181 891 IN IN @911 86 68 LC U mu * * U et mu au mu u mu wi Hug Nil 81181 mu mu~~~~~~~11w u K c CN O" ami Os II tAmuao tit WI Ii. s u It Ie amIl 16 8 6 r Int a a"t @9 r of OK at Halt We miez Ut WI*8g

me M fill 4, nt ts ta ft au "or -V'I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~a"ltt

am dute uet flat eef ii I'8 Gas6 Iit pu rn U. 8 * 6 6 0 * 10' So 818 68 6111.8 61M ILl t lit *6-*1

118 888 Iii RH89 RI% 1 I P IP iAs P.mC SI at *I 8 1 oil II1 68 LIt it81 -4111 WIll HI4 at"n ~ VSalt W- k18 8l8 A I I 0* 68i i4Ou 68 * IO 0 SiHP&8 91 INi 81 II '488 P88 I uf n g .egW,4l ll m u @8 18 u t U W 68 @9818 I UZ 618 68 68 ~AIi II II I~~~~"i -M.& U WPd -w U H H A I U I I 01 88 1 6-"-Oq Ii S U HI1 W H 1

688it hal) t~~~~ AHId APIL IIHA @991 LIPId @POW911P" WWAS i*6 .111 P~~~~~~4 enj 1li1,q~~~~~ p.,.. I.N,u.u,oM'Vw

-44 -

Annex 2Table 5


(Cr. 1467-BD)Project Completion Report

Summary of Financial and Economic Prices

Unit Financial Economic1/2/A. Outputs: TWlkg (FY94)Paddy-Aus Tk/kg 6.1 7.3Paddy-Aman Tk/g 6.5 7.8Paddy-Boro Tk/kg 6.2 7.4Wheat Tk/kg 6.4 8.9Jute Tk/kg 8.1 11.2Oilseeds Tklkg 14.2 15.4Pulse Tklkg 15.7 13.0Sugarcane Tklkg 1.1 1.4Poato Tk/kg 4.6 3.8Sweet Potato TIVkg 5.0 4.2Vegetables Tk/kg 2.8 2.3Spices (fresh chilli) Tk/kg 14.0 11.6

B. Inputs:SeedsPaddy-LV Tk/kg 10.5 12.6Paddy-HYV Tk/kg 10.0 12.0Wheat TkJkg 12.0 16.7Jute Tk/kg 24.0 19.9Oilseeds Tk/kg 19.4 21.0Pulse TWkg 25.4 21.1Sugarcane cuttings/kg 1.0 0.83Potato Tk/kg 8.5 7.1Sweet Potato TiSkg 5.0 4.0Vegetables Tk/kg 400 332Spices TiSkg 600 498

Fertilizers:Urea Tklkg 5.3 6.9TSP TkJkg 8.4 9.5MP TkJkg 8.2 8.0Pesticides Tlikg 504.0 655.2Manure TiSkg - 1.0 0.8Draft animal Tk/pd 45.0 45.0Unsidiled Labour Tk/md 40.0 33.2

(1) Average 1990-1995 prices in FY94 constant value.(1) Non-traded commodities were adjusted by SCF of 0.83.

- 45 -

Annex 2Table 6

BANGLADESHBWDB Small Schemes project


Cropping Pattem of 3 Acre Farm-Flood Control and DrainageWOP WP

Cereals:

Local S. aus 0.50 0.43Local T. Aus 0.23 0.32HW Aus 0.18 0.21Deepwster aman 0.11 0.10Local T. Aman 1.48 1.18HYV T. Aman 0.39 1.04Local Soro 0.08 0.08HYV Boro 0.83 0.99

Subtotal Rice 3.79 4.36

Wheat 0.04 0.14

Total Cerehas 3.83 4.50

Other Cmps:

Jjte 0.17 0.16Pulses 0.36 0.48Oi seeds 0.07 0.13Sweet Poato 0.01 0.01Potato 0.01 0.02Vegetables 0.04 0.05Spices 0.02 0.05Othr 0.01 0.01

Total Other Crops 0.68 0.90

Total Cropped Area 4.52 5.40Net Cuttvated Area 3.00 3.00Crop Intesifty 1.51 1.80

Net Farm lcome(rk) 22850 30850Family LaboLr(md) 161 190ReturntoLaboLir(nlcmd) 142 162

- 46 -

Annex 2Table 7.1



Cropping Pattem of 3 Acre Farm-Irrigation Sub-project(Chenchuri)

WOP WPCereals:

LocalB. aus 1.32 0.12Local T. Aus 0.00 0.00HYV Aus 0.00 0.06Mix aus and aman 0.06 0.09Local T. Aman 1.23 0.84HtYVT. Aman 1.05 1.78LV Boro 0 0HYV Boro 0.00 2.33


Wheat 0.12 0.08

Total Cerelas 3.78 5.30

Other Crops:

Jute 0.24 0.16Pulses 0.21 0.08Oilseeds 0.17 0.11Sweet Poato 0.00 0.00Potato 0.00 0.01Vegetables 0.14 0.18Spices 0.13 0.13Other 0.17 0.12


Total Cropped Area 4.84 6.09Net Cultivated Area 3.00 3.00Crop Intensity 1.61 2.03

Net Farm Income(Tk) 20627 56426

- 47 -

Annex 2Table 7.2



Cropping Pattern of 3 Acre Farm-irrigation Sub-project(Halda)

WOP WPCereals:

Local B. aus 0.74 0.00LocalT. Aus 0.09 0.14HYV Aus 0.04 0.76Mix aus and aman 0.00 0.00Local T. Aman 1.68 0.90HYVT. Aman 0.42 2.10LV Boro 1.18 0HYV Boro 0.13 1.80


Wheat 0.00 0.00

Total Cerelas 4.28 5.70

Other Crops:

Jute 0.00 0.00Pulses 0.27 0.08Oilseecls 0.07 0.12Sweet Poato 0.00 0.00Potato 0.00 0.03Vegetables 0.11 0.14Spices 0.00 0.02Other 0.00 0.01


Total Cropped Area 4.73 6.10Net Cultivated Area 3.00 3.00Crop Intensity 1.58 2.03

Net Farm Income(Tk) 21279 57596

- 48 -

Annex 2Table 8

BANGLADESH

BWD9 Small Scherrs ProjectCCR 1457-80)

Project CompletOn Rep,rt'Economic Price Dervation

Rice/Paddy Wheat Sugar Soybeans Jute L!rea TSP MPM M M M X X M M

Word Price:FY90-95(USSItQ11 298 174 267 264 400 153 135 109Warld Price:FY30-95(Tklv)2/ 11920 6960 10680 10560 16000 6120 5400 4360AdjustmrntFactorp%)3/ 0.90 1.10 1.23 1.30 1.00 1.40 1.40 1.40Adjusted FOB/CF Prices 10728 7656 13083 13728 16000 8568 7560 6104Handling/Transport charges(Pats-wholesale markets) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1600Market Prices 12528 9456 14883 15528 14200 6768 9360 7904

Processing costs 320 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Processing ratio 0.65 0.95 0.10 1.00 0.80 1.00 1.00 1.00

Price of Paddy equivalent 7935 8983 1488 15528 11360 6768 9360 7904Handling&Transpoat charges(Farm and markets) 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120Farmgate prirce(Kt) 7815 8863 1368 15406 11240 6888 9480 8024Fermgate price(TK/kg) 7.8 8.9 1.4 15.4 11.2 6.9 9.5 8.0

M-Import X-Export

1/ World Bank(s Commodity Price Forecasts, March 1994. Average 90-95 prices adjusted to FY94 constarrtvalue.Rice: Thai, milled, 5% brcJ<en. FOB Bangkok; Wheat: Canadian No.1 Westem Redspring, Thunder Bay; Soybeans:US. CIF, Rottrdam. Soybeons and mustard/linseed are assumed to be equal value; Sugar. FOB and stowed at greater Carribbean PortJute: white 0, Bangladesh, FOB Chalna; Urea: FOB Chitmgong/Chalna: TSP: FOB US Gutf: MP: FOB US Gulf.

2USS1 .0-Tk40.03/Based on relationhip between imporlexpcrt value and prices of reference qualrty.

- 49 -

Annex 2Table 9


(Cr. 1467- SD)Project Completion Report

lrvestmert and Operating Cost or 2-CLsec LLPBoro Rlce Wheat T. Aus Total

Irrigation voter requirement(nches/acretyear) 42 15 10Operating Time(hours) 21 7.5 5

Present IrrlgaUon Per PumnpIrrigated Area(Acre) 20.8 3 0Operating Time (houlyear) 437 23 0 460

FLtLure Irrigation per PunpIrrigated Area(Are) 30 13 6.0Operating Time (hourJy 630 98 43 771

lrwestmert CostseCi: Costs Life(year) CRF(l 7.6%) Annully

Engine 50000 10 0.219 10950PLmnp. pipes&fittings 27000 10 0.219 5913Subtotal(FinanclaQ 77000 16863Subtotal(Economic) 72410

Operating Costs(rM: WOP WP(460hTs) (M hTS)

Fuel.0.625 gallorVho.r@i Tk 0o0/gallon. 28750 48190LubrIcants, 2.6% of luelt Tk 1 so/gailon. 1290 2170

Wages for operator 5520 9250Repalrimalntenance 4695 7870Aimdty 16860 16860Subtotal 57115 84340

Cost per HoLr (Tk) 124.2 109.4

irligation Cost per Acre(fTk) Boro Wheat T. AusFiruncial:WOP 2610 950WP 2300 825 780

Econorric:WOP 1780 650WP 1780 640 610

- 50 -

Annex 2Table 10

BANGLADESHBWDB Small Schemes Projects

(Cr. 1467-BD)Project Completion Repcrt

Iruestmert and OperaUng Cost of 0.6- Cusec STWBoro Rice Wheat T. Aus Total

Irrigation water requkementlonches/acretyear) 42 15 10Operating Time(hou's) 84 30 20

Present Irrigation Per PumpIrrigated Area(Acre) 4.0 7 0Operating Tlime (hourlyear) 336 210 0 546

F,Lutre Irrigation per PurpIrrigated Area(Acre) 9 3 5.5Operating Time (hoir/y 756 90 55 901

Inreestmert Costs(rk): Costs Life(year) CRF(1 7.6%) Annulty

Engine 19000 7 0.259 4921Pnmp, plpes&fittings 30000 10 0.219 6570Installatlon 5000 10 0.219 1095Subtotal(Flnanclai) 54000 12586Subtotal(Economic) 48000

Operatllng Costs(TO: WOP WP(546tTs) (901 t'rs)

Fuel,0.2 gallonrhoLr@ Tl 00/gallon. 10920 18020LLbricants, 2.5% of luel@ TK 1 8O/gallort 490 810Wages for operator 6500 10810Repalrftnaintenarce 1710 2820Armuity 12600 12600Subtotal 32220 45060

Cost per HoLE (lk) 59.0 50.0

Irrigation Cost per Acre(TI) BSro Wheat T. AusFlronclal:WOP 4960 1770WP 4200 1500 500

EconorTic:WOP 2830 1010Wp 2830 1010 340

- 51 -

Annex 2Table 11

BANGLADESH

EWDS Small Scheme Project(CR 1467-1--BD)

Project Completion ReportInvestment and O&M Costs of the Hadda Extension Irrigation Sub-project

Description:

-capacity per pup 6408 m3/hour-head per pump 9.4 m-capacity of ransformer per station 1.270 KW-rated power per pump 270 KW-power consumptionipump 225 KW-shaft power/pump 191 KW-motor effciency 86%-number of pumps 6(2 standby)- minimum number of operators required 8-minimum number of guards required 16

-Gross Irrigation requirements 55.5 million m3/year(3.100 ha)11 average,31Ificiency

-average GIR 17908 m3tha/year-potentil irrigab4e area 3,100 ha-pump hours-average Gift/capacity 5.6 hour/ha /year-energy requirement(pump hours) 1.260 kwhl ha/year

-Investment cost(FY94 constant) FinancialmKM) Economic(Tk M)-civil works catual costs) 306.1 256.7-civil works (completion costs)I/ 44.6 38.9-pumping equpment (actual costs) 100.1 96.7

Total 450.8 392.3-unit cost 145.419(rk/ha) 126.548(rk/ha)

-Annual O&M costs (3.100 ha):-2% of civil works 7.0 5.9-3% of pumping equipment 3.0 2.9-electricity costs2/ 9.6 7.9-fixed charges(l2x1Z70 kw installed)3/ 0.9 0.0-standing charges4/ 0.1 0.0-wages 0.6 0.5

Total 21.2 17.2-unit cst(Tkibalyear) 6839 5548

11 Estimated by SWDB. Chittagong.2VTk2.451kwh.

3/Fixed charges-Tk3O/KW insalled/month.4/ Standing charges-Tk90/KW installed/month.

- 52 -

Annex 2Table 12

BANGLADESH

BWDB SmSl Schemes F Project(CR 1467-l-BD)

Projeat Corrompletion R ReportInvestment and O&M Costs of the Chenchul Tigation Sub-project

Descripton:

-caracfty pa- pump 1260 m3thour-head per pump 8m-capacity of transformer per station 150KW-rated power per pump 150 KW-power consumption/pump 60 KW-shaftpower/pump 50 KW-number of pumps 4-minimum number of operators required 8-minimum number of gaards required 0

- average GIR 179C8 m3fhalyear-poreTtial irrigable area ,037 ha-pump hoLrs-average GlRlcapacity 14.2 hour/ hayear-energy requirement(pump hou-s) 71 kwhtha lyear

- Investment cost(FY94 constanri Financial( Economic(Tk g)-civil works 74.0 61.7-pumping equipoment 26.4 25.6Totl 100.4 87.3

-unitcost(Tk/ha) 96820 $418S-unit cost(4D0 ha)

-Annual O&M costs-2% of civil works 1.5 1.3-3% of pumping equipment 0.8 0.8-eleclcitry costs2 1.8 1.5-faced chargesWc1,270 kw insalled)'t 0.1 0.0-sanding charges4/ 0.0 0.0-wages 0.6 0.5

Toul 4.8 4.1-unit cost(Tkta/year) 4630 3950

1/ Feasibilty study estimates.21 TrK4AS(wh.3/Fixed cherges-Tk3O/KW installed/month.4/ Standing charges-7<90KW insmlled/manth.

- 53 -

Annex 2s ,E5 33;3a3;-!;2 ~ 9Table 13

iE----------------. ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~~.

. .o . ._. . . .o . . . . ._ ...

... __..___..._.

44

IT ............... s -s-

. ..............

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

, -_ : _ ------

'2 '_2'''g

5;;

-s.S

o B - :-.-:I::_

{.~~~ - -:::

- 54 -

-4X:|-.3"2,S%@2-;-.%a,-,Annex2~:1tU9t,=s2t Table 14

: j3

* -

i -- ~-o--_

_ ,'3 -!$ -!

3~~~3

_

_ _5U-.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

* '.

*af ; _: w S '- ,

-_ -@ ---. 4.,-

_ ~ ~~~~~ * *

1- _g_8^*__*vvX_*0

6AN6CLADO ICC,VMS #..6 M4...o. 96*44

ICR. 1442.803"'I I C..bC, A4Pt

VIII KAoI P..d.,.6 4.04.616.1 1.6.6 6*1~~s.d4 to. 104 WV US6d. .b A.l..1 kA,id..0- It 6.Con, I4041 02.4 Coo

Lkb, mi.. SA.W IMb.. 13 be lb be Tb go Tk Kg lb go lb No kg od lk p4 lb lb lb lb lbI. A... 6.16~ ~ ~ :A66 1)44 III0 I103 ISO 1330 II 124 Is is K K K K 60 4646 44 2614 6113 off of"4

1. A- I.1 .21 I Iota4 1144 41664 34 lUg 34 la4 to 114 C 14 K C 0.4 a 14) 4144 44 161K 4K soft $0 fill11113A.. LOU8 3.01 21441 14642 I3*0 30 IN Il 364 32 304 to I6 C 4 6 .20 164 CM 6442 CO INS 476 6)41 CM0 1*324MC.A..AA-.o I.1 S.4 3*2 16 60 SC 1C K 4 I 2366 34 1114 0306 630 669IiLVl. A-. ,lK LO 140416 64 11614 340 44 14H 46 26 g 24 6 I C 6.11 SIC 43 41 st44 16o4 420 IN 440 R"VW T. A:... 2. to4 03540 hOl 04*46 30 0 44 *1 33 314 26 U6 6 .4 46 131 4614 163 426 S4le 064 4144i...l S.* 02 4.1 123 3 26412 36 441 26 CU C 0 4 K 4 .4 33 4 643 I441 1430M 440 0216OTI S.. 36 316 36404 262 26.71 S1 4K 14 4193 4 S26 K 4g g K 1.62 CMI0" 43 01114 4I'll *3 2466" 1354 12246Vvh..I I t0 1.60 tol 046 11616 164 1736 I421 4 10 6 6 6 160 SNC 21S66 19646 1S443Ad.4 6.10 3.46 I6040 loss 16061 CI 34 4 6 0 43 4 K C 6 42 6 0 73 36 CI. SII 66 104361.4.4. 6.32 6 4*~~~~~~~~00334 6 6034 34 R 1)4 I CM 66 CI :4CO K C 24 3K CM 5333M CI064..d. 4.26 6 40700 K 14166~~~~~~~~~sla S Il 26 INR 12 SI 6 K 1 67* 10S1144 44

V.b4. .64 K 134 41.4S42 4 64 31 33 I 6 6 7 S 6383 10OS44 63

0o'. 34.26 6 264860 0 3IN & 4 160C 04 40 ICS 164 02 6641 44 3&4* 4 6 a6l 1354 6s 16Sul13 4 63131 1*303

it A-2.4. Y.64,. 0-6It.

LA

totil CT oft I 2"9 11 119, LOT 0 11 It"c P, I 011, 901 11", 1:1" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~SO-l 1111 L"'I4Pp'i4LtILL IIC:SLO IS S 051 LI I OI O1 I.,lL IS lISt 101 1Oll? I"II, LT ~ *SSOI LOU LII.I t 51 O LL OL ' I 0 I S NO I 51 IL O

* I I . IKI S I 5-- I PLC0 tIt I 5 0 5 I S S* I.I5lilt4 tOt PSt: IS I 00 1I I 011 05 OI IC KS 'll "I, I 100 SLg0mI PlS

0055 LOS LOIS OILS~~~~~~~~~~~~~09 0 tilIl IS It IO to II I .S.S.IIL .. GOS I 00 L@I

I.,1 .L IO :IlS IT SIlL I0 I S I I IS PCS I L ll I Ol I SL r ISIIN. Il Sll OS i 51 I 0 l NO 010 5P0 It OI P It S,I IL 090 PI SI'llS: 55 NILL0 lS@5I AS

og~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -2 *n *1 0*W -1r- 1sI

civil $110I It$ *"t *Xt NoS 1g * s : n 1 t1 el t 1* t *w t.

5000 ILL 1100 109~~ ~~1 O tIPOP OL II I I I 01 055 001 lIt P00 Its LI 50 II00 101,01 500 IOIS S clflIt IILS U ill OIl I I 0 00 PI Ioft Is' Ut I 00610 0010f 10100 asI 01 0 1l

LOlL 501 0091 1011 It OttO ILl I III I I It I ItS 05 OIl SO ISO 00 00000 tOIL 00045 Ill ItO "000 LAO~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~99 n POs ' A I10M K OI'S IS L SIO U I IITI I'lI I I I IlLS11 I'Sl 01011 'IN., SILtS1 III: or o v1lots il I 1 I'S 1 Sl I1 0s n 10 010 I 110 I 510 *SWAUs00 9 00119 till of St 00W U 0 1 I P10 PI O I Ul I* t1o11 0000 0511 Lt I l011 L fS et?ll to fill 9 1 0 I IOl I: II f * 001 IS oft of 01011 IlLS rol It II

II.!10:*tg o V " 0 0 0 :o 11 3 1 1. 0155 tl4ol50I t53till IiOI III. l*wL XL c su pd OIL PW l 15115014all0plI N ti pIId I0 d § e l 4l 41 a" -v l *11

-3 11 SO.*~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0ILO ~1491 II-OvIlm I-M -q,l P -,PC Al 4SI, 41 'P.'s~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~II 0Y~ST

*ns W TlCG stTl Tt ele ttl nT 2 @ @ § § e e *11 lT £¢ ¢leT XsT @tzz e fs *"g1'"1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-, W1,15-4 I-S-4 -3-p- -

1oT01 n t oG * lss al " *l " * oa X stz w nP XtG eD ous WowG *ls sw ve *"rY's^AIII.-Oz -09-h-sots toT t os sSl 1F tew s1 * o @ @ w t nl I nl t1t t *tttg tttg @§"1 *|t tg wnWY'sA1~~~~~~1-9ti 'Vo

tt4t ttw t ll @ tts tOl g g @ @ @ * * @ etgl 001 t§"l lttl ttl t l FG l *Y1s"Y n~~-4-S 11-1



Actual Project Costs (rk Million)

Current Costs:1/ FY85 FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Total

TotalProject 45.87 75.28 113.70 81.73 216.35 262.04 310.36 280.75 177.84 164.42 1728.34Kangsha FCD 11.46 11.94 20.98 12.19 15.38 9.62 17.72 2.32 5.77 11.67 119.05Kalaroa Dralnage 6.86 18.76 11.30 1.79 2.96 2.11 3.73 2.72 3.38 6.71 60.32Btghal FC 10.83 24.08 11.45 2.40 3.96 2.03 3.73 2.32 5.11 8.67 74.58Chenchurl Irrtgatton 1.70 1.35 3.25 1.16 3.04 6.66 7.99 29.25 23.86 12.67 90.93Hatda Extension Irug. 1.40 1.30 3.28 4.40 28.42 28.40 45.57 94.38 56.26 112.77 376.18

FY94 Constant Prices:2/

Total Project 80.04 119.88 162.59 108.09 269.90 313.14 342.17 299.p0 184.06 164.42 2043.29Kangsha FCD 20.00 19.01 30.00 16.12 19.19 11.50 19.54 2.47 5.97 11.67 155.47Kalaroa Drainage 11.97 29.88 16.16 2.37 3.69 2.52 4.11 2.90 3.50 6.71 83.80 LA

Bighal FC 18.90 38.35 16.37 3.17 4.94 2.43 4.11 2.47 5.29 8.67 104.70Chanchuri Irrigation 2.97 2.15 4.65 1.53 3.79 7.96 8.81 31.15 24.7 12.67 100.37Halda Extension Irdg. 2.44 2.07 4.69 5.82 35.45 33.94 50.24 100.51 58.23 112.77 406.17

Economic Costs:3/

Total Project 69.64 104.30 141.45 94.04 234.81 272.43 297.69 260.13 160.14 143.05 1777.67Kangsha FCD 17.40 16.54 26.10 14.03 16.69 10.00 17.00 2.15 5.20 10.15 135.26Kalaroa Dralnage 10.41 25.99 14.06 2.06 3.21 2.19 3.58 2.52 3.04 5.84 72.91Blghal FC 16.44 33.36 14.24 2.76 4.30 2.11 3.58 2.15 4.60 7.54 91.09Chenchuri Irrigation 2.58 1.87 4.04 1.33 3.30 6.92 7.66 27.10 21.48 11.02 87.33Haida Extenslon Irng. 2.13 1.80 4.08 5.06 30.84 29.53 43.71 87.45 50.66 98.11 353.37

Source: Project Management Unit (PMU)1/ Annex 1, Table 5.1. Costs of sub-projects included the estilmated costs of the constructilon equlpment, costs of feasibility sludy,enginnering design, monitorlng of construction and overhead costs prorated from Iho total costs ol 17 sub-prolocis and the costs of FFWP.2/ Assuming 75% local costs adjusted by GNP dellators and 25% forelgn exchange costs adjusted by MUV Index.3/ Assuming 75% local costs adjuslad by SCF of 0.83 and 25% forelgn exchange costs adjusted by CF of 1.0.

CD1

- 58 -

Annex 2Table 18

BanQaCesh_w__ Smait Schemes Protct

(Cr. 1467-53)Copped rea--Kangsna ae)

WimtoutPre a wt PmrFY92 FY93 FY94 FY96 FY96 FY92 FY93 FY94 FY9S FY96

Khtf ILoW S. AU5 2025 1789 1989 1934 1904 1894 1809 1774 1614 1540L0al T. Aus 180 176 187 181 181 150 139 173 163 152HYVWAu5 1110 987 1080 1059 1042 825 793 822 746 6930eepewr Amen 467 510 487 488 495 456 402 443 421 402MfiC Aus enC ArnanJAC 159 145 151 152 149 142 159 127 149 161Vegeawles 31 29 31 30 30 41 41 37 39 39

Lrai T. Aman 4142 3987 4265 4131 4128 4322 4378 4105 3976 3845NV T. Aman 2179 1659 2087 1975 1907 2348 2366 2689 2797 2971

Loal r or 589 495 480 521 499 510 531 534 534 534HYVaoru 4504 4704 4304 4504 4504 5015 4709 5145 5348 5488wiheatIf 137 113 189 146 149 276 317 288 294 310Pt9ses 65 59 53 59 57 34 46 43 48 56odseecs 98 78 85 87 83 173 194 213 223 249Swec PoatoPoatc 14 19 27 20 22 2 24 28 32 53vege=fles 68 91 83 81 85 76 87 91 95 105SpFces 10 9 10 10 10 35 35 37 39 47OmerTaal Cropped Ara 15778 14850 15506 15378 15245 16319 16030 16499 16518 16645Net CutNa= Area 9828 9828 9828 9828 9828 9828 9828 9628 982S 9628Crop Intensity 1.61 1.51 1.58 1.56 1.55 1.66 1.63 1.68 1.68 1.69

1/ Wheat comprss onry t-V since local vnety aJmoS 0lsapeareCl.

- 59 -

Annex 2Table 19

agiighdshwE Sdmal Scl.s prq*c

(Cr. 1467-8;OCppeld Aim ghi (to)

Athaut Project WeSh Proieet i/FY92 FY93 FY94 FY9s FY96 FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 FY9s

KhsN I

Locel a ausLocal T. Au% 1394 1130 1317 1315 1340 19t2 1775 1745 1736 171CHYVAus 39 95 117 97 102 so 223 310 320 332S. AmanUemu,s and aownJUI 4 2 2 3 2 3 3 3 6 7Vsogetahla, 21 14 26 24 20 29 21 28 27 26

Local T. Am4n 3756 382 3510 3e25 3797 4074 2917 2593 2200 1717NYVT. Amon 212 159 530 234 255 226 13ee 1709 21C2 25s6

Loc lSoro 16 17 21 1 1 1 1 1MYV Soro 3 3 9 12 1s 17 20Wheat

Pusvs 1002 1351 1386 1221 1379 1400 2155 2285 2310 2320Or,eds 5 4 a 4 4 6 1s 5s as 140S-wt Poezo 74 5I 57 55 5S 9 43 46 5o 52Poulo 7 7 9 1i 10 01 60 56 60 s0Vagetables se 65 72 46 55 57 55 7s 67 99Sp.ms (chit) 49 61 65 46 54 so 90 1u8 1S6 210Other (Waw rIr) 9 5 5 1s 16 a a 6 6 eT

otl Cropped Ana 662 6807 7131 68 7117 6006. 6637 9074 alo 9295Nat Culti dA,a 4A56 4658 e 6 465 4858 45 4e 4e5s 45 4 465Cro InSosity 1.37 1.42 1.47 1.43 1.47 165 1.82 1-e7 1.89 1.91

Noe.: In Ye3 h8. .. a--s domagad by focding.

OW0O S.4a schemes Pr4sci(CI. 1407-.O(

CeoppedAim-Ihioa (ha)

WlhoutlPaolecl Wtth PIo.etFY88 FY89 FY90 FYDI FYs2 FY93 FY94 FY95 FY08 FY88 FYs0 FY90 FY01 FY92 FY93 FY94 FYs5 FY08

Khiidt ILoal b. Aus 1539 15D7 1507 1I87 148 1503 1409 1487 1458 150t 1287 180 1521 1487 1420 1415 140t 13SoLocalT. Au 38 t0 41 37 28 35 43 38 34 1t12 140 137 151 140 183 2t8 30' 311IYv Au% 00 92 a5 101 78 74 88 85 82 102 137 175 243 277 35 38t 371 370DeopologAman 228 234 233 227 t9t 217 215 222 238 220 221 233 241 247 252 254 25? 250Utlad Aus and Aman.5U. 9z2 879 944 884 803 950 807 087 98? 852 85D 012 927 879 907 U2 8ad0? 8s

V.gdnbbo 5 7 " 9 8 to a 12 15 5 7 8 8 0 9 Ito I 12rIha,8 IILoalT. Amon 2275 2317 22089 23D5 2175 2123 2114 2108 20c9 2309 20D? 2407 2437 2415 2488 2a43 2444 2452WV T. Amen 545 578 810 815 543 40t 48? 482 483 587 700 958 1089 1213 1457 1407 1503 1514

PebiL11*1wLocal BoaoHYV Oowo 942 am8 1013 1087 1109 l103 1102 Ills 1121 s8e lo0t 1027 1048 1087 1113 1123 1147 1170Whl 102 1W7 III 105 123 119 123 137 151 137 t87 213 283 3t9 411 433 523 633Pul.m 724 708 707 740 824 *53 887 9Om a7l 754 783 9am 7(8 am8 014 82? 843 854Os .d, 320 3t3 331 325 320 341 353 383 387 333 321 343 397 379 422 425 443 4t8Sl.a&ePelo 19 1 to 19 23 17 1t 19 21 17 ls 17 14 i I5 t5 14 14 14Poetb 35 41 43 40 47 47 49 SI 57 37 39 41 43 '44 47 48 40 20Veg9 blez 28 31 29 33 32 31 35 39 41 29 33 31 37 35 37 30 41 43SpIce 57 58 53 59 47 40 53 54 57 83 58 07 85 as 72 71 72 74 0othe (Sugarcana SI A1 51 51 47 SI s0 50 s0 SI SI SI SI St SI SI 51 soTo1l Csopp.dAim 7s10 7735 90327 9193 7950 0014 80151 Bil8 sl8e o100, 8848 985 0154 0401 10847 10189 10358 1s884NetCu.o1 dAt*& 5811 5811 5811 5811 5811 SalI saiI 5811 s58t 1 511 5811 51 5811 5811 5811 5811 5411 5811C op Inlt.3sty 1.41 1.42 1.44 t.48 1.42 1.43 1.43 1.45 1.48 1.48 1.54 1.59 1.83 1.89 t.79 1181 1.5 1.88

Hga. O

- 61 -

Annex 2Table 21

SNGLADESH8WDB Small sctemes Projet

(Or. 1467-0) Annec2Project Complefon Feport Tale 21

Crappedt Ares- Cferlcrl tSel lrription (a)

WmhoutPmrect wnnpmPmctFY95 rFY FY97 FYPE F FYS5 FY96 FY97 FY93 FY54

LQcl S. Aus 470 467 464 461 458 469 258 150 70 40Local T. AusHWVAUs 48 38 33 30 20O epwater AmanAmdAuse arnAman 32 30 26 24 20 32 32 32 32 32JtC 62 67 74 78 82 55 50 45 40 35

VMgmlies 9 10 12 15 20 9 15 17 20 25

LQQI T. Aman 486 453 437 429 426 428 386 338 315 291HWVT. Amian 311 326 346 356 363 393 453 503 543 617

HYV Boro 300 552 880 768 807Wheat 31 33 35 38 41 35 34 32 30 28Pulses 83 81 79 76 71 el 75 70 60 55

qNseeC1 52 54 55 57 58 50 45 42 40 37S*eeKPoarPQtCtQ 2 3 3 4 5

eg.m0ies 18 20 23 26 29 25 27 30 35 36SpeCs 40 41 43 44 45 42 44 45 46 47086r rne) 80 60 s0 60 60 60 55 50 45 40

Taal Cmpp Ame 1634 1642 1654 1664 1673 2029 2067 2070 2078 2115Net Cut LL A-l 1037 1037 1037 1037 1037 1037 1037 1037 1037 1037Crop Inmnsiry 1.58 1.58 1.5 1.60 1.61 1.96 1.99 Z00 200 Z04

- 62 -

Annex 2Table 22

BANGLADESHswoD Small schemes Proiet

(or. 1d7-90)Proect CompleVUOn Repcrt

0bdpp Area-Hata tfIgaOn SuD-protct(a)

Wthout Pmout wltt pojectrim FY97 FYS3 F m FYC t FY97 FYE FYl) FYm

LElS. Aus 215 375 517 647 764Lal T. As 25 44 60 76 90 30 60 a5 115 140HW Aus 14 23 31 38 45 180 330 485 635 790Deepw.t Amen

t Aus artl manJA"Vugirllesi

Local T. Amanl 392 728 1064 1400 1738 210 390 570 750 930MYVT. Amen 96 182 256 350 434 480 910 1330 1750 2170

Local Sw3 231 454 664 961 1221mwarO 25 50 s0 105 135 380 715 1140 1500 1960WheatPulises 39 e 138 200 279 42 65 66 94 7804a.:Vs Ia1 23 32 50 70 14 33 67 94 132Sweet PoB9PaC 2 3 5 12 16 4 7 14 19 31'ageu bes 21 42 67 2 116 21 46 71 106 140Spces 2 3 5 6 6 2 7 10 19 23Otr- "m nelon) 2 3 5 6 6 2 3 10 13 16T CaiMea Aea 1077 2011 2965 3929 4918 1345 2566 3868 5095 6310Ngt COA M Area 700 1300 1S00 2500 3100 700 1300 1900 2500 31000> Inwmty 1.54 1.55 1.56 1.57 1.59 1.92 1.97 204 204 Z04

- 63 -

Annex 2Table 23


(CR. 1467 - BD)Project Completion Report

Economic Analysis - Kangsha FCD (Tk Million)

Investment O&M Costs 1/ Inc. Net Prod. Incr. NetCosts Value Benefits

Yearl (FY85) 17.4 -17.4Year2 16.5 -16.5Year3 26.1 -26.1Year4 14.0 -14.0YearS 16.7 -16.7Year6 10.0 -10.0Year7 17.0 -17.0Year8 2.2 34.1 31.9Year9 5.2 40.5 35.3Yearl 0 102 2.7 44.2 31.3Year1l 2.7 48.3 45.6Year12 2.7 53.6 50.9Yearl3 2.7 53.6 50.9Yearl4 2.7 53.6 50.9Yearl 5 2.7 53.6 50.9Yearl 6 2.7 53.6 50.9Year17 2.7 53.6 50.9Yearl 8 2.7 53.6 50.9Yearl 9 2.7 53.6 50.9Year2O 2.7 53.6 50.9Year2l 2.7 53.6 50.9Year22 2.7 53.6 50.9Year23 2.7 53.6 50.9Year24 2.7 53.6 50.9Year25 2.7 53.6 50.9Year26 2.7 53.6 50.9Year27 2.7 53.6 50.9Year28 2.7 53.6 50.9Year29 2.7 53.6 50.9Year3O 2.7 53.6 50.9Year3l 2.7 53.6 50.9Year32 2.7 53.6 50.9

Economic Rate of Return = 19.3%

1/ Estimated at 2% of the investment costs.

-64 -

Annex 2Table 24


(CR. 1467 - BO)Project Completion Report

Economic Analysis - Bighai FC (Tk Million)


Yearl (FY85) 16.4 -16.4Year2 33.4 -33.4Year3 14.2 -14.2Year4 2.8 -2.8YearS 4.3 -4.3Year6 2.1 -2.1Year7 3.6 -3.6Year8 2.2 15.1 12.9Year9 4.6 28.2 23.6Yearl 0 7.5 1.8 29.1 19.8Yearl1 1.8 34.7 32.9Yearl2 1.8 37.4 35.6Yearl3 1.8 37.4 35.6Yearl 4 1.8 37.4 35.6Yearl5 1.8 37.4 35.6Yearl6 1.8 37.4 35.6Yearl7 1.8 37.4 35.6Yearl8 1.8 37.4 35.6Yearl9 1.8 37.4 35.6Year2O 1.8 37.4 35.6Year2l 1.8 37.4 35.6Year22 1.8 37.4 35.6Year23 1.8 37.4 35.6Year24 1.8 37.4 35.6Year25 1.8 37.4 35.6Year26 1.8 37.4 35.6Year27 1.8 37.4 35.6Year28 1.8 37.4 35.6Year29 1.8 37.4 35.6Year3O 1.8 37.4 35.6Year3l 1.8 37.4 35.6Year32 1.8 37.4 35.6



- 65 -

Annex 2Table 25



Economic Analysis - Kalaroa Drainage (Tk Million)

Investment O&M Costs 1/ Inc. Net Prod. incr. NetCosts Value Benefits

Yearl (FY85) 10.4 -10.4Year2 26.0 -26.0Year3 14.1 -14.1Year4 2.1 9.1 7.0Year5 3.2 15.5 12.3Year6 2.2 17.2 15.0Year7 3.6 21.6 18.0Year8 2.5 29.1 26.6Year9 3.0 38.4 35.4Yearl0 5.8 1.5 38.9 31.6Yearl 1 1.5 41.1 39.6Yearl 2 1.5 43.3 41.8Yearl3 1.5 43.3 41.8Yearl 4 1.5 43.3 41.8Yearl 1.5 43.3 41.8Yearl6 1.5 43.3 41.8Yearl 7 1.5 43.3 41.8Yearl 8 1.5 43.3 41.8Yearl9 1.5 43.3 41.8Year2O 1.5 43.3 41.8Year2l 1.5 43.3 41.8Year22 1.5 43.3 41.8Year23 1.5 43.3 41.8Year24 1.5 43.3 41.8Year25 1.5 43.3 41.8Year26 1.5 43.3 41.8Year27 1.5 43.3 41.8Year28 1.5 43.3 41.8Year29 1.5 43.3 41.8Year3O 0.0 0.0 0.0Year3l 0.0 0.0 0.0Year32 0.0 0.0 0.0



- 66 -

Annex 2Table 26



Economic Analysis - Chenchuri irrigation (Tk Million)


Yearl (FY85) 2.6 -2.6Year2 1.9 -1.9Year3 4.0 -4.0Year4 1.3 -1.3Year5 3.3 -3.3Year6 6.9 -6.9Year7 7.7 -7.7Year8 27.1 -27.1Yearg 21.5 -21.5Yearl0 11.0 -11.0Yearl 1 1.9 18.2 16.3Yearl2 2.9 25.4 22.5Yearl3 3.4 28.9 25.5Yearl4 3.8 31.6 27.8YearlS 4.1 33.9 29.8Year16 4.1 33.9 29.8Yearl7 4.1 33.9 29.8Yearl8 4.1 33.9 29.8Yearlg 4.1 33.9 29.8Year2O 4.1 33.9 29.8Year2l 4.1 33.9 29.8Year22 4.1 33.9 29.8Year23 4.1 33.9 29.8Year24 4.1 33.9 29.8Year2S 4.1 33.9 29.8Year26 4.1 33.9 29.8Year27 4.1 33.9 29.8Year28 4.1 33.9 29.8Year29 4.1 33.9 29.8Year3O 4.1 33.9 29.8Year3l 4.1 33.9 29.8Year32 4.1 33.9 29.8Year33 4.1 33.9 29.8Year34 4.1 33.9 29.8Year35 4.1 .-33.9 29.8

ERR= 18.0%

1/ Annex 2, Table 12. Assuming 20% supplementary irrigation for Aus, Aman and jute, 35% for wheatand 100% for HYV Boro.

- 67 -

Annex 2Table 27


(CR 1467-SD)Project Completion Report

Economic Analysis-Haida Extenslon Irrigatlon (rk Million)(31 00 ha)

investment O&M Costs 1/ inc. Net Prod. Inc. NetCosts Value Benefits

Year1 (FYs8) 2.1 -2.1Year 2 1.8 -1.8Year 3 4.1 -4.1Year 4 5.1 -5.1Year 5 30.8 -30.8Year 6 29.5 -29.5Year 7 43.7 -43.7Year 8 87.5 -87.5Year 9 50.7 -50.7Year 10 98.1 -98.1Year 11 19.5 -19.5Year 12 19.5 4.1 21.6 -2.0Year 13 8.0 43.6 35.6Year 14 12.2 66.2 54.0Year 15 15.3 86.6 71.3Year 16 20.0 106.8 86.8Year 17 20.0 106.8 86.8Year 18 20.0 106.8 86.8Year 19 20.0 * 106.8 86.8Year 20 20.0 106.8 86.8Year 21 20.0 106.8 86.8Year 22 20.0 106.8 86.8Year 23 20.0 106.8 86.8Year 24 20.0 106.8 86.8Year 25 20.0 106.8 86.8Year 26 20.0 106.8 86.8Year 27 20.0 106.8 86.8Year 28 20.0 106.8 86.8Year 29 20.0 106.8 86.8Year 30 20.0 106.8 86.8Year 31 20.0 106.8 86.8Year 32 * 20.0 106.8 86.8Year 33 20.0 106.8 86.8Year 34 20.0 106.8 86.8Year 35 20.0 106.8 86.8

ERR= 11.9%

1/ Amex 2. Table 11 . Assuming 20% of suppiementary irrigation for T. Aus and Aman. S0% for Local Boro and 1 00% for HYV Boro

- 68 -

Annex 2Table 28


(CR 1467-BD)Project Completion Report

Economic Analysis - Whole Project (Tk Million)

Investment 1/ 0 & M Costs Inc. Net Prod. Inc. NetCosts FCO 2/ Halda3/ Chenchuri 3/Total O&M Value Benefits

Year 1 (FY85) 69.6 0.0 0.0 -69.6Year2 104.3 0.0 0.0 -104.3Year3 141.5 0.0 11.9 -129.6Year 4 94.0 0.0 18.8 -75.2Year 5 234.8 0.0 20.8 -214.0Year 6 272.4 0.0 65.0 -207.4Year 7 297.7 0.0 131.9 -165.8Year 8 260.1 0.0 287.9 27.8Year 9 160.1 0.0 431.9 271.8Year 10 143.1 0.0 537.1 394.0Year 1 19.5 26.7 1.9 28.6 642.7 594.6Year 12 19.5 26.7 4.1 2.9 33.7 699.1 645.9Year 13 26.7 8.0 3.4 38.1 752.1 714.0Year 14 26.7 12.2 3.8 42.7 782.4 739.7Year 15 26.7 15.3 4.1 46.1 805.1 759.0Year 16 26.7 20.0 4.1 50.8 825.3 774.5Year 17 26.7 20.0 4.1 50.8 825.3 774.5Year 18 26.7 20.0 4.1 50.8 825.3 774.5Year 19 26.7 20.0 4.1 50.8 825.3 774.5Year 20 26.7 20.0 4.1 50.8 825.3 774.5Year 21 26.7 20.0 4.1 50.8 825.3 774.5Year 22 26.7 20.0 4.1 50.8 825.3 774.5Year 23 26.7 20.0 4.1 50.8 825.3 774.5Year 24 26.7 20.0 4.1 50.8 825.3 774.5Year 25 26.7 20.0 4.1 50.8 825.3 774.5Year 26 26.7 20.0 4.1 50.8 825.3 774.5Year 27 26.7 20.0 4.1 50.8 825.3 774.5Year 28 24.9 20.0 4.1 49.0 820.9 771.9Year29 24.9 20.0 4.1 49.0 820.9 771.9Year 30 21.3 20.0 4.1 45.4 744.0 698.6Year 31 17.7 20.0 4.1 41.8 664.0 622.2Year 32 14.1 20.0 4.1 38.2 562.4 524.2Year 33 5.2 20.0 4.1 29.3 317.7 288.4Year34 0 20.0 4.1 24.1 140.7 116.6Year35 0 20.0 4.1 24.1 140.7 116.6

Economic Rate of Return 25.2%

1/ Annex 2, Table 17.2/ Approximately 2% of the investment costs.3/ Annex 2, Tables 26-27.

/ t 89 90? 99- 92

!?._ '> X ~~~~~~~~~~~BANGLADESH,!! '),, 8 tses i, !BWDB SMALL SCHEMES PROJECT

-/ y 5 v res.,ti ~~~SUBPROJECTS USED FOR ERR CALCULATION

! gt ) p ;_ ' G t \ ,<Gazht. * ~~~~~~~~~~~SUBPROJECT LOCATIONS

-2 i/lugon , REGION CAPITALS26

I DI&A RANGPUR <Ii DIVISION CAPfTALS

\ ' \ < % <i7 i ( ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~NATIONAL CAPITAL

x J t Rangpur t 4; . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~MAIN ROADS

Kst,/.o. '\Dmult t, t X _ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~RAILROADS

s . , \. . \ / - ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ REGION- BOUNDARIES

\. + \ \ 0 te ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~DIVISION BOUNDARIES

. . > | ff t > - - ~~~~~~~~~~~INTERNATIONAL BOUJNDARIES

i , ., .< . . , ,i | t t FJAMALPUR t _. ---- -

25 {¢ ) eOCRA33 ( X X 1. t K~~~~~~~~~~~K ~ an Dnznr Cucb / 1, 25-2) =i, \ tW zI,aapr,,\ , >lhe~'\

,} sXsunfi;i;°, OG' Ao9a; MA NSNHYLF / -rsl.rs .tx RAJSHANS t p \ t g Smensingh) \vS < s / t J /,

\, Xt \. [ ' ' | - / '. gMadFupur 1 \ . , a .- .>~~~~~~k> . , < X 2 li f) TAIXIGAiL ; & J Hab/gon~~~~~~~~SLH f

-2.1 k , /, l' ( )Jydebour I.tj N D I A 24

' .t

=; / t _ >\X1 j [ J I i (:!lTli\G()j}G C.- 1

, t t !< X 1h: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-)COMILLA I

t Klaf D,bio'se \ 1 O' 1FARISOPUR 1v e '

| N D | A \ S > . l , V , < E x. N( )AKHAtI \ <y!_ t~~~~~~~~~~HILn \ jV 'R' KHULNA > ! jt' i' / / Peduckhah Eli ks \ \+> v'?' l \~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~2

' 1 ! F; t : *^ghaiFIOOdnfr,Ol i ch,"gOng << l h i~~~F

,, 1 , , , /PTUKHL. g\ $Ka-

II N D IBNDRAANEPAL, >\._ ,,.^HUThu *; ) n . I~~~ KHAL

''~~~@~' ''ts\ k iUfNj'>, ; INIA ilty t t11 : { -| /' t+

". \ - .. t k \. !~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Cing; X OHAKA ./ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ t <~opro

INDIA \Pt.9 I/sIlEIS r\~ t \ D 21A

2 2i 22

. ¢ ,J 0 2j'i 'j0 7'i Kilrelers \~~~HITTGON'

v '*!; o 2'i 5i1hnales i_;~~~IANDAABANEPAL rB1e77 9t9t 2 .

r r.n~--X

IMAGING

ReDort No; 16174TyDe: PER

I

world bank documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/168021467996771146/... · 2016-07-08 · dps...

Documents