working paper 127 the nile basin water resources: overview

36
WORKING PAPER 127 The Nile Basin Water Resources: Overview of Key Research Questions Pertinent to the Nile Basin Initiative Yasir Mohamed and Makonnen Loulseged International Water Management Institute

Upload: others

Post on 11-Feb-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

WORKING PAPER 127 The Nile Basin WaterResources: Overview ofKey Research QuestionsPertinent to the Nile BasinInitiative

Yasir Mohamed and Makonnen Loulseged

I n t e r n a t i o n a lWater ManagementI n s t i t u t e

Working Paper 127

The Nile Basin Water Resources: Overview ofKey Research Questions Pertinent to

the Nile Basin Initiative

Yasir Mohamedand

Makonnen Loulseged

International Water Management Institute

ii

The authors: Yasir A. Mohamed is a Senior Researcher specializing in hydrology and waterresources at the IWMI Nile Basin and EAST Africa office in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. He also worksas a part time lecturer at UNESCO-IHE, Delft, The Netherlands; Makonnen Loulseged is aResearcher specializing in water resources at the IWMI Nile Basin and EAST Africa office in AddisAbaba, Ethiopia.

Acknowledgments: This paper is the outcome of a research project conducted with the participationof several partners: Initial participants were: The Nile Basin Initiative (NBI), Association forStrengthening Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central Africa (ASARECA), International FoodPolicy Research Institute (IFPRI), World Agro-forestry Research (ICRAF), WorldFish and theChallenge Program for Water and Food (CPWF). However, several other research partners joinedduring the project implementation stage. The research is funded by the International DevelopmentResearch Center (IDRC) with a matching fund from the International Water Management Institute(IWMI). The authors wish to acknowledge the support provided by the NBI and the researchorganizations, in particular, those who participated in the final workshop at Entebbe, Uganda inFebruary 2007. The authors are highly indebted to individuals and organizations who have willinglysupplied information and data directly or indirectly adding value to the outputs of this project.

Mohamed, Y.A.; Loulseged, M. 2008. The Nile Basin Water Resources: Overview of key researchquestions pertinent to the Nile Basin Initiative. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International WaterManagement Institute. 34p. (IWMI Working Paper 127)

water resources / research institutes / research projects / river basin development /partnerships / Africa / Nile Basin

ISBN 978-92-9090-689-6

Copyright © 2008, by IWMI. All rights reserved.

Please direct inquiries and comments to: [email protected]

IWMI receives its principal funding from 58 governments, private foundations, andinternational and regional organizations known as the Consultative Group onInternational Agricultural Research (CGIAR). Support is also given by the Governmentsof Ghana, Pakistan, South Africa, Sri Lanka and Thailand.

iii

Contents

Acronyms ............................................................................................................................ iv

Summary ........................................................................................................................... vii

Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1

The Nile Basin Initiative ............................................................................................................. 3

Research Areas Pertinent to the NBI Program ........................................................................... 5

Ongoing Research Projects and Institutions Working in the Nile .............................................. 7

Available Databases and Bibliography Pertinent to the NBI ................................................... 10

Discussions ........................................................................................................................... 12

References ........................................................................................................................... 13

Appendix 1: The Nile Basin Initiative ...................................................................................... 14

Appendix 2: Research Topics Pertinent to the NBI Projects ................................................... 18

Appendix 3: National Water-related Research Institutions ....................................................... 22

Appendix 4: Ongoing Research Projects Relevant to the NBI ................................................. 23

iv

Acronyms

ALTERRA Is part of the Wageningen University and Research Center concernASARECA Association for Strengthening Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central AfricaATP Applied Training ProjectAWM Agricultural Water ManagementCBO Community Based OrganizationCBSI Confidence Building and Stakeholder InvolvementCGIAR Consultative Group of International Agricultural ResearchCIDA Canadian International Development AgencyCPWF Challenge Program for Water and FoodEAC East African CommunityEIA Environmental Impact AssessmentENSAP Eastern Nile Subsidiary Action ProgramENTRO Eastern Nile Technical Regional OfficeESA Eastern and Southern AfricaEWUA Efficient Water Use for AgricultureFAO Food and Agriculture OrganizationFEWS Flood Early Warning SystemGWP Global Water PartnershipGWP-Ena Global Water Partnership for Eastern AfricaHYDROMET Technical Cooperation Committee for the Promotion of the Development and

Environmental Protection of the Nile BasinIAEA International Atomic Energy AgencyIDEN Integrated Development of Eastern NileIDRC International Development Research CenterICRAF World Agroforestry CenterIFPRI International Food Policy Research InstituteILRI International Livestock Research InstituteILRI-GIS International Livestock Research Institute-Geographic Information SystemIMAWESA Improved Management of Agricultural Water in Eastern and Southern AfricaITC International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth ObservationIWMI International Water Management InstituteIWMI-DSP International Water Management Institute -IWMI-NBEA International Water Management Institute for Nile Basin and Eastern AfricaIWRM Integrated Water Resources ManagementNTEAP Nile Transboundary Environmental Action ProjectMDG Millennium Development GoalsMoU Memorandum of UnderstandingNBI Nile Basin InitiativeNBRP Nile Basin Research ProgramNBTF Nile Basin Trust FundNELSAP-CU Nile Equatorial Lakes Subsidiary Action Program-Coordination UnitPMU Project Management Unit

v

RPT Regional Power TradeSC Steering CommitteeSDBS Socioeconomic Development and Benefit SharingSVP Shared Vision ProjectSWMNet Soil and Water Management NetworkTAC Technical Advisory CommitteeTECCONILE Technical Cooperation Committee for the Promotion of the Development and

Environmental Protection of the Nile BasinUNESCO-IHE Institute for Water EducationWMO World Meteorological OrganizationWRPM Water Resources Planning and Management

vi

vii

Summary

The Nile Basin Initiative (NBI), inaugurated in 1999, is a remarkable achievement towards thecooperative development and management of the common Nile water resources. The NBI reflectsa strategic shared vision defined by all riparian states for sustainable socioeconomic developmentthrough the equitable utilization of, and benefit from the common Nile water resources. At present(2007), the NBI has numerous ongoing programs, and projects on the ground. These are based ona Shared Vision Program (SVP) and a Subsidiary Action Programs (SAP). The SAPs areimplemented in the two subbasins: The Nile Equatorial Lakes Region and the Eastern Nile Region.In general, all programs and projects seek sharing benefits from the common Nile water resources.

It has been recognized that, successful implementation of the NBI projects is challenged by anumber of issues: The size and complexity of the basin (over 3 million Km2, shared by 10 countries);high population pressure; food insecurity; extreme poverty; political instabilities; limitedunderstanding of the biophysical resources; among other factors. These challenges, clearly recallfor research to complement the NBI endeavors, to ensure that policies, investments, and basinmanagement strategies are informed and equipped by the best available scientific knowledge. Whilemany researchable questions are already part of the NBI projects, apparently clear gaps still existand need parallel investigation.

IWMI, together with other five CGIAR centers (ILRI, IFPRI, WorldFish Center and ICRAF)the CPWF (Challenge Program for Water and Food) and ASARECA (Association for StrengtheningAgricultural Research in Eastern and Central Africa) worked together with the NBI projects in along consultation process to identify knowledge gaps, and assess opportunities to foster synergiesand information sharing for the support of the NBI mission. Extensive consultative discussionshave been conducted separately with (almost) all the NBI, SVP and SAP projects. The objectivehas been to identify research gaps of direct support to the given projects. Research areas wereprioritized during the large workshop held in Entebbe, in February 2007, which was attended byresearchers, NBI staff and, donors.

This paper presents the main findings on: (i) Identified and prioritized research questions relatedto the Nile water resources; (ii) pertinent research projects ongoing and the implementing institutions;and (iii) the available databases hosted by different centers and a bibliography of relevant Nileresearch. Possibilities to enhance synergies and support future research in the Nile have beendiscussed at the end of the paper. Key research areas identified among a number of topics include:

1. Generation and provision of data on the Nile Basin natural resources (mainly land andwater resources), and the status of their use. The objective is to fill in the noticeable datagaps, in particular in the upper catchments.

2. Climate change, climate variability, impacts and adaptation. A cross cutting topic pertainingto several NBI projects.

3. Conjunctive use of ground and surface water resources. A topic not sufficiently revealedwithin the NBI projects.

viii

4. Land use change, impacts and feedbacks: Identifying main derivers of land use change;valuation of different ecosystem resources; implications on water resources, and thesocioeconomics of the Nile people.

5. Agricultural water productivity. Measures (research, extension and/or training) requiredto increase agricultural water productivity. Trade offs on sustainable livelihood andenvironmental stability.

6. Benefits and beneficiaries: What types of benefits pertinent to NBI projects? Who are thebeneficiaries? Identifying criteria for benefit sharing at various scales.

7. Institutional and legal issues for managing multi-country projects.

8. Harmonization of policies and legislations among countries and across sectors.

1

INTRODUCTION

The Nile Basin

The Nile Basin, having the world’s longest river (6,700 km) is shared among ten countries. Thecatchment area of the basin is about 3.3 million km2. It stretches over different geographical, cli-matological and topographical regions. The climate and vegetation cover in the basin are closelycorrelated with the amount of precipitation, which decreases from above 1,000 mm/yr in the southernpart to virtually zero in the northern part crossing the Sahara Desert.

The precipitation and river-flow also encompasses sharp seasonal variability. The Spatialvariability of evapotranspiration shows opposite trends to precipitation, i.e., increases in northwarddirection. The relative contribution to the mean annual Nile flow at Aswan of 84 billion m3 isapproximately 4/7 from the Blue Nile, 2/7 from the White Nile (of which 1/7 is from the Sobat),and 1/7 from the Atbara River, i.e., the Ethiopian catchments (Sobat, Blue Nile and Atbara River)contribute to about 6/7 of the Nile water resources at Aswan.

Despite the fact that, the Nile Basin is endowed with extraordinary natural resources, itsinhabitants face considerable challenges. The region is considered as one of the poorest regionsof the world. More than 70% of the Nile population depends directly or indirectly on farming fortheir incomes and livelihoods. Water scarcity is a major challenge for the already closed basin.The challenge is further exacerbated by incidence of climate variability and natural shocks suchas droughts and floods. Environmental degradation, high population growth and unstable politicalconditions are overreaching issues in the basin. Theses challenges pose significant threats for foodsecurity and the social welfare of the Nile inhabitants.

It has been increasingly recognized among the riparian states that, cooperation on developmentand management of the Nile water resources can yield major benefits from the river on food andenergy production, and will underpin many other benefits for the welfare of the basin inhabitants.The Nile Basin Initiative, established in 1999, is an exceptional collective basin-wide initiative bynine of the ten states that share the Nile River, namely, Burundi, Congo, Egypt, Ethiopia, Kenya,Rwanda, Sudan, Tanzania and Uganda. It envisages a new path for achieving poverty eradicationand prosperity, peace and cooperation, sustainable development and environmental protection withinthe basin. To realize this shared vision of the NBI, the countries have devised a Strategic ActionProgram that promotes a Shared Vision Program and two investment Subsidiary Action Programs(SAPs). Additional description of the NBI is given in the section on ‘The Nile Basin Initiative’.

The NBI devotes significant efforts and resources for the implementation of their projects.However, mandated with project management and overall control, the NBI staff usually contractinternational and regional firms to execute the technical assignments of these projects. The questionis, in such a set up, why, and how can research be of support to the NBI? Earlier discussionsamong research centers and the NBI recognized that research is still required to complement bestpossible execution of the projects. Additionally, there are lots of objectives shared between researchorganizations and NBI, which gives credence to the efforts on synergism and share results for thebenefit of all programs.

2

Research in the Nile Basin

There are a number of ongoing and planned research projects in the Nile Basin that are pertinentto the NBI, which are being executed by several research organizations,. IWMI has a Nile Basinand East Africa office in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, which undertake a number of research projectson land and water management. Two CGIAR centers have their headquarters in Nile Basin coun-tries: World Agroforestry (ICRAF), and the International Livestock Research Center (ILRI), andmost other centers, like IFPRI, WorldFish Center, ICRAF working in areas of food policy, fisher-ies, forestry, are active in one or more of these countries. The Nile is one of the nine ‘BenchmarkBasins’ of the CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food (CPWF). ASARECA, its headquarter located in Entebbe, Uganda, operates in nine out of ten riparian countries aiming to sup-port agricultural research that adds value to national programs.

Therefore, both NBI and the CGIAR centers, including IWMI and ASARECA recognize thecommon shared objectives, and that creating an effective partnership could make a major contributionto the achievement of the Shared Vision of the NBI. Accordingly, a project entitled ‘CreatingSynergies and a Partnership among the CGIAR, Nile Basin Initiative and ASARECA:Consultations to Identify Opportunities to Support NBI through Research and CapacityBuilding’ was commenced in early 2006 and completed in April 2007. This project seeks consultationto jointly provide, a strategic demand-driven research program, and to create a long-term partnershipof key players in knowledge generation and management for developing and managing land andwater resources in the Nile Basin. Though this project was completed in April 2007, it has forwardedsome thoughts for follow up, which are mentioned in the section on ‘Discussions’. The formalpartners that initiated the project, in addition to the NBI, IWMI and ASARECA-SWMNet are:ILRI, IFPRI, ICRAF, WorldFish Center, and the CPWF. Other research partners, e.g., Food andAgricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Alterra, UNESCO-IHE, ITC, and IAEAjoined along the course of the project. Attempts are being made to bring new research partners towork in the Nile Basin. A final project workshop was held to prioritize researchable areas duringFebruary 9–10, 2007, in Entebbe, Uganda. This workshop was attended by more than 35 participantsfrom the NBI projects and from various other research centers in the region and overseas (allinvolved or interested in the Nile Basin research). http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/africa/East/Workshop/CGIAR-NBI%20strategies_WORKSHOP.htm

This paper presents the main findings of the technical part of the research, i.e., identificationof research gaps with regard to the Nile Basin water resources, inventory of available databasesand ongoing research programs, and a brief review of the basin’s main stakeholders. The sectionon ‘The Nile Basin Initiative’ gives a brief description of the NBI projects as an introduction tothe following section— ‘Research Areas Pertinent to the NBI Program’, which discusses theresearch areas. The section titled ‘Ongoing Research Projects and Institutions Working in the Nile’presents a summary of ongoing research projects and institutions involved in the Nile Basin research.Databases currently built by different organizations are listed in the section on ‘Available Databasesand Bibliography Pertinent to the NBI’, together with a bibliography of the Nile literature. Lastly,the section on ‘Discussions’ discusses the future prospect of synergies and partnerships for researchof the Nile.

3

THE NILE BASIN INITIATIVE

This chapter aims to present a pithy review of the NBI and its associated projects. The countriessharing the Nile Basin are: Burundi, Congo, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Sudan, Tan-zania, and Uganda. Demands for the Nile water resources for food security and development hasbeen increasing among different uses as well as among the countries. This poses increasing pres-sure on the already closed basin, and results in increasing environmental degradation within thebasin. However, the Nile is also endowed with rich natural resources and hold huge opportunitiesfor win-win development that could enhance food production, energy generation, and other relateddevelopment openings. As clearly acknowledged by many stakeholders, this can be attained onlythrough cooperative management and development of the shared river among the riparian states.The Nile Basin initiative provides a unique forum for the countries of the Nile to move towardsthe cooperative process to realize tangible benefits in the basin and build a solid foundation of trustand confidence.

Prior to the emergence of the NBI, collective cooperation and development in the basin hadbeen constrained by disagreements as to the supervision and management of the Nile water resource.Historically, there were initiatives and treaties for joint cooperation, mostly bilateral and trilateral(Waterbury 1979; Okidi 1990). Recent cooperative initiatives (after obtaining independence)includes: the HYDROMET project from 1967 to 1992, in the Equatorial Lakes. The TECCONILE(Technical Cooperation Committee for the Promotion of the Development and EnvironmentalProtection of the Nile Basin) was started in 1993, focusing on a development agenda. The seriesof the ‘Nile 2002 conferences’ also started in 1993 and continued up to 2002. It provided goodforum for scientific discussions and (informal) dialogues on Nile issues.

These cooperative efforts, with the support of the international community, paved the way forthe Nile Basin Initiative (NBI) established in 1999. It is the first collective basin-wide initiative bynine of the ten states that share the Nile River (Eritrea holds an observer status). After an intensivedialogue and consultation, the Nile Basin countries have agreed on a ‘Shared Vision’ that seeks“to achieve sustainable socioeconomic development through the equitable utilization of, andbenefit from, the common Nile Basin water resources.” The objectives of the NBI are:

1. To develop the water resources of the Nile Basin in a sustainable and equitable way toensure prosperity, security and peace for all its peoples;

2. To ensure efficient water management and optimal use of the resources;

3. To ensure cooperation and joint action among the riparian countries, seeking win-win gains;

4. To target poverty eradication and promote economic integration; and

5. To ensure that the program results in a move from planning to action.

To realize these objectives, the countries have devised a Strategic Action Program (SAP) thatpromotes a Shared Vision Program (SVP) and two investment Subsidiary Action Programs. TheSVP is designed to build the institutional capacity, relationships and technical skills needed to supportthe NBI’s two investment programs: the Nile Equatorial Lakes Subsidiary Action Program(NELSAP) and the Eastern Nile Subsidiary Action Program (ENSAP).

4

Shared Vision Program (SVP)

The components (portfolios) of the SVP projects include the following eight projects. Moreparticulars on the SVP projects’ objectives and description are given in Appendix A1.1; thisinformation is also available on http://www.nilebasin.org.

1. The Applied Training Project (ATP);

2. The Nile Transboundary Environmental Action Project (NTEAP);

3. The Nile Basin Regional Power Trade Project (RPTP);

4. The Efficient Water Use for Agriculture Project (EWUAP);

5. The Water Resources Planning and Management Project (WRPMP);

6. The Confidence-Building and Stakeholder Involvement Project (CBSIP);

7. The Socioeconomic Development and Benefit Sharing Project (SDBSP); and

8. The SVP Execution and Coordination Project.

The Subsidiary Action Program (SAP)

In parallel to the SVP, groups of countries have initiated Subsidiary Action Programs (SAPs) tocooperatively identify and implement investment projects that confer mutual benefits. To date, theNile riparian states have formed two Subsidiary Action Programs—one on the Eastern Nile re-gion and the other in the Equatorial Lakes region based on wide consultation at the political andtechnical levels.

Eastern Nile

ENSAP (The Eastern Nile Subsidiary Action Program): The ENSAP currently includes Egypt,Ethiopia, and Sudan. The primary objectives of ENSAP are to: (a) ensure efficient watermanagement and optimal use of resources through equitable utilization and causing no significantharm; (b) ensure cooperation and joint action between the Eastern Nile countries seeking win-wingains; (c) target poverty eradication and promote economic integration; and (d) ensure that ENSAPresults in a move from planning to action. Consequently, consensus was reached that the objectiveof a first ENSAP project, referred to as the ‘Integrated Development of the Eastern Nile (IDEN)Project’, will be to “initiate a regional, integrated, multipurpose development project through a firstset of investments that confer tangible, win-win gains and demonstrate joint action between theEastern Nile countries.” Further information on the ENSAP is given in Appendix A1.2.

NELSAP (The Nile Equatorial Lakes Subsidiary Action Program): The Nile Equatorial Lakesregion includes the six countries in the southern portion of the Nile Basin: Burundi, Democratic Republicof Congo, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda, as well as the downstream riparian states Egyptand Sudan. The water resources of the Nile Equatorial Lakes region include one of the world’s great

5

complexes of lakes, wetlands, and rivers. The region’s economies are characterized by rain-fedagriculture, subsistence farming, low industrialization, and poor infrastructure development. Theobjectives of the Nile Equatorial Lakes Region Subsidiary Action Program (NELSAP) are to contributeto the eradication of poverty, promote economic growth, and reverse environmental degradation.Twelve NELSAP projects have been identified by the Nile Equatorial Lakes riparian in a consultativemanner, targeting investments in water resources management of shared-sub-basins, hydropowerdevelopment and transmission interconnection, fisheries development and lakes management, waterresources management, agriculture development, and water hyacinth control. More information onthese projects is given in Appendix A1.3.

RESEARCH AREAS PERTINENT TO THE NBI PROGRAM

Identification of knowledge gaps and researchable areas to support the NBI program is not self-evident and automatic. The NBI is an extensive program, although encircled around the Nile Basinwater resources, it is addressing almost every aspect: socioeconomic (food security and livelihood),technology (management and development), politics (benefits and transboundary relations), amongothers. How all these are interlinked to national, subbasin and basin scales, and stakeholders inter-ests is also very complex. Through confining objectives of the proposed research topics to supportNBI projects, we clearly define a focussed goal and a domain of activities. However, the chal-lenge—in order to avoid duplicating NBI work—is how to create clear distinction between re-search and actual NBI project activities. Next, what is the best possible research path; should itinclude holistic research programs; or a demand driven research for specific NBI project(s); orseparate research topics? Are we going to first redefine the NBI project problem tree, and iden-tify a research that omit elements covered by the NBI project, and work on the absent parts?Who is going to do the research? How are we going to create the integration among differentresearch projects, and the synergies with the NBI projects? How to get funding for the researchprojects? These have been evolving questions, from the start of this project up to the final work-shop, partly resolved, and partly suggested for future discussion.

Although it is difficult (occasionally) to find a clear cut between research and NBI projects,the proposed research questions given above are supposedly not duplicating NBI’s projects. A clearexample of not being a research question, though a well-known research tool is the modelling task.NBI devotes substantial efforts and resources for modelling projects, e.g., the Nile Decision SupportSystem DSS, or the several planning and forecasting models. Are we going to suggest modellingas a research assignment? Of course, not, but we can target research gaps that exist within specificmodel(s), e.g., knowing that the Nile is a data scarce region, what is the best possible input data(boundary conditions) for a given model(s). A second example, what is the most suitable (locallyadapted) reservoir sedimentation algorithm to be imbedded in a river simulation model? Is therealso a research gap in river simulation models? Therefore, right from the start, two conditions wereset to identify researchable areas of support to the NBI projects:

1. The identified question(s) should not duplicate project work, at least the obvious projectparts.

2. The output of the research question(s) should directly be valued by a one or more NBIprojects.

6

The procedure adopted along the course of this synergy project to identify research questionsfollowed the three steps given below:

First, research questions were extracted from literature reviews. Normally, address prominent(known) problems in the Nile Basin such as land degradation (soil erosion, deforestation andsedimentation), climate change, low agricultural productivity, etc.

Second, research gaps for an NBI project were identified through mini workshops andconsultation with the NBI staff. The NBI project staff was requested to provide research gapswithin their project, or comment on research questions suggested from step one above. This is toexclude research questions already addressed by the given NBI project.

Third, to assemble research questions from different projects and address cross cutting areas,a final workshop had been conducted, whereby both NBI projects and scientists from researchcenters have discussed and prioritized research areas. The workshop included presentations onknowledge gaps given by all NBI SVP projects (except RPT and CBSI), NELSAP, and ENSAP.Presentations on relevant research were made by most of research centers working in the NileBasin, including: IWMI, ILRI, CPWF, IFPRI, FAONile, UNESCO-IHE, ITC, IAEA, ALTERA,and ASRECA-SWMNet. Sufficient time had been devoted for group discussion to prioritize andclassify research questions into four thematic areas: (1) Water Resources; (2) Agriculture;(3) Environment; and (4) Socioeconomic Development and Benefit Sharing. The workshop material(presentations, discussions, etc.) is available at http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/africa/East/PROJECTS/CGIAR-NBI%20strategies.htm.

The workshop discussions showed that many topics were cross cutting over several projects,and that some of the questions raised by the NBI projects were not exactly research questions. Infact, they were more like a combination of problems that include research, consultancy (informationprovision) and project activities. For example, some of the raised questions can be resolved directlyby the NBI projects, or by consultants, others, were actually implementation problems and notresearch-related. The ample time allotted for group discussion during the workshop, allowedsufficient debates to refine and prioritize the relevant research areas. The summary of a consolidatedlist of cross cutting topics is given below and additional details on the research problem, objectives,and relevancy to NBI projects are presented in Appendix 2. One may notice that, strong divisionof NBI project activities and research questions in some cases is still not crystally clear. Researchquestions related to the NBI projects: RPT and CBSI are not included in the list. The identifiedmain research areas, pertinent to the NBI projects include:

1. Data: Provision of data on the natural resources system and uses to fill in (noticeable)data gaps within the basin, in particular in the upper parts, including data on actual useand performance.

2. Hydroclimatology: Improve understanding of climate change and climate variability. Improveassessment of vulnerability of resource and use systems (land and water). Improveassessment of impacts on those systems. Provide recommendation to enhance adaptationand coping strategies.

3. Watershed Management: Improve understanding of available watershed resources, andthe existing practices and needs for better utilization. Identify best possible watershedmanagement interventions and their impacts.

7

4. Agriculture: Assessment of agricultural water potential, use, and productivity, and how toimprove.

5. Environment: Environmental resource assessment, status of use, and how to reversedegradation.

6. Socioeconomics: Improve understanding of available Nile resources, potential developmentand their impact on socioeconomics of the Nile people, benefits, and benefit sharing.

7. Water Resources:

a) integrating groundwater into surface water management;

b) assessment of the spatio-temporal variability of water resources, and how should theybe managed to enhance economic development and reduce inequities sustainably;

c) research to improve understanding of river morphology, and reservoir sedimentation;

d) research on options and modalities of water resources institutions and associated policiesat subbasin (national) and basin (trans-regional) levels; and

e) research on water resource development/management and their health impacts.

ONGOING RESEARCH PROJECTS AND INSTITUTIONS WORKINGIN THE NILE

As part of stakeholders mapping, and to review ongoing research projects pertinent to the NBI,this section presents a brief overview of national, regional, and international research centers cur-rently involved in research projects relevant to the NBI program. Some of these are initial projectpartners (IWMI, ASARECA-SWMNet, ILRI, CPWF, IFPRI, WorldFish Center, ICRAF), othersparticipated in the project’s final workshop (ALTERRA, FAONile, UNESCO-IHE, ITC, IAEA),and the rest too are equally involved/interested in the Nile Basin research. A brief summary isgiven in this section, while additional information about institutions and their projects is presentedin Appendix 4.

National Research Institutions

Except for Egypt, and to a limited extent Sudan, there are few national centers specialized in water-related research. Usually such research is carried out by universities and academic institutions. Ingeneral, the capacity of water professionals and institutions in the Nile region is weak, let alonenational research centers and their cadre. These have been clearly revealed by the need assess-ment reports of the Applied Training Project ATP, namely, (a) lack of capacity on integrated waterresources management; (b) uneven distribution of capacity between basin countries; and (c) littleinteraction among water professionals within the basin.

The list of national training institutions prepared by the ATP is amended in Appendix 3 as potentialresearch centers from the riparian countries. The corresponding column gives potential areas ofspecialization of each institute.

8

CGIAR Centers

All main partners of the project except ASARECA are members of the Consultative Group onInternational Agricultural Research (CGIAR). The CGIAR is a strategic alliance of countries,international and regional organizations, and private foundations supporting 15 international agri-cultural centers that work with national agricultural research systems and civil society organiza-tions including the private sector. The alliance mobilizes agricultural science to reduce poverty, fosterhuman well-being, promote agricultural growth and protect the environment. The CGIAR gener-ates global public goods that are available to all. The CGIAR’s Regional Plan for Collective Ac-tion in Eastern and Southern Africa is a very recent institutional innovation of the CG Centers andis aimed at fostering greater cohesiveness, economies of scale and scope and regional impact.

IWMI NBEA http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/Africa/East/: Nile Basin and East Africa Office of IWMIlocated in Addis Ababa. It is the lead partner of this project, and implements numerous researchprojects on water resources, hydrology, and irrigation management. Please refer Table A 4.1 forongoing projects.

CPWF http://www.waterandfood.org/basins/nile-river-basin.html : The Challenge Program on Waterand Food (CPWF) is a CGIAR program. The Nile is one of the CPWF’s benchmark basins forbasin focal studies.

ILRI http://www.ilri.org/: The International Livestock Research Centre, having its Head Quarterin Nairobi, Kenya is actively engaged in most Nile Basin countries. ILRI works on livestock-relatedprojects, see Table A 4.2 for more information on ILRI research programs.

IFPRI http://www.ifpri.org/: The International Food Policy Research Institute has several ongoingresearch projects in some of the Nile countries that focus on main research themes: food systemfunctioning, food system governance, and food system innovations. Please refer Table A 4.3 formore information on these research programs.

WorldFish http://www.worldfishcenter.org/ WorldFish Center having a regional office in CairoEgypt, specializes in research of living aquatic resources. Please refer Table A 4.4 for moreinformation on these research programs.

ICRAF http://www.worldagroforestry.org/: The World Agroforestry Centre has its headquartersin Nairobi-Kenya and its research is organized around the four themes: (1) Trees and Markets;(2) Strengthening Institutions; (3) Land and People; and (4) Environmental Services.

ASARECA-SWMnet http://www.asareca.org/: The Association for Strengthening Agricultural Re-search in Eastern and Central Africa (ASARECA) is an organization of the National AgriculturalResearch Institutes (NARIs) in Madagascar and the Nile Basin Countries except Egypt. The Soiland Water Management Research Network (SWMnet) for East and Central Africa was startedin 1998 to respond to the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) on poverty eradication, hunger;and environmental sustainability. Please refer Table A 4.5 for more information on these researchprojects.

9

Other Research Institutions

The following are other research organizations involved in research work within the Nile Basin.Although these are not initial partners of the project, their inclusion aims at further expandingsynergies and partnerships in the future.

FAONile http://www.faonile.org: The Information Products for Nile Basin Water ResourcesManagement Project is intended to strengthen the abilities of the Nile Basin states to take informeddecisions with regard to water resources policy and management. Supported by the Governmentof Italy, the FAONile project is carried out under the umbrella of the NBI. It is implemented bythe ten Nile riparian states with technical and operational assistance of the Food and AgricultureOrganization FAO. Please refer Table A4.6 for more information on the ongoing projects.

GWP-EnA http://www.gwpena.org/: The Global Water Partnership is a working partnership amongall those involved in water resources management. The Eastern Africa Global Water Partnershipwas launched in November 2002 and is now hosted by the NBI Secretariat at Entebbe in Uganda.

UNESCO-IHE http://www.unesco-ihe.org/about/intro.htm: Is the International Institute for WaterEducation, Delft, The Netherlands. Large numbers of the Nile water professionals have completedtheir post graduate or are currently studying at UNESCO-IHE. The knowledge networks projectfor the Nile Basin (Cairo, Egypt) is run by the UNESCO-IHE to create networks and Communitiesof Practice on the basis of the ongoing project (NBCBN-River Engineering), http://nbcbn.com/Home.asp

ITC http://www.itc.nl/research/default.asp: The International Institute for GeoinformationScience and Earth Observation, Enschede, The Netherlands, is similar to IHE. Many waterprofessionals from the Nile region who specialize in remote sensing and GIS applications havegraduated or are currently studying at the ITC. The institute carries out multidisciplinary andproblem-oriented research in support of its education and project services.

University of Bergen https://nile.uib.no/: The UiB hosts the Nile Basin Research Program NBRP.The program is associated with the Applied Training Program (ATP) of the NBI. The NBRP focusesthematically on contested resources, climate dynamics, health and socioeconomic aspects.

ALTERRA http://www.alterra.wur.nl/UK/: Alterra is the research institute of the WageningenUniversity. Their ongoing project in the Nile Basin entitled ‘New Water Adaptive WaterManagement Research in the Nile Basin’ focuses on integrated water management, and effectsof climate. The project aims at developing adaptive water management systems, both forinfrastructure (storage and buffering capacity), and management (regime and institutions).

IAEA http://www.iaea.org/: The International Atomic Energy Agency is a United Nations Agencythat works on the peaceful uses of nuclear technology. The objective relevant to NBI is to improvethe management of water resources through use of isotope technologies. Please refer Table A 4.7for more information on the ongoing projects in the region.

FRIEND NILE http://62.193.88.134/fn/: The FRIEND (Flow Regimes from InternationalExperimental and Network Data). The FRIEND/Nile Project aims at improving the river basinmanagement of the Nile through promoting cooperation in the field of water resources managementand regional-scale analysis of hydrological regimes.

10

Nile Basin Discourse http://www.nilebasindiscourse.org/index_EN.php: It is a network of civilsociety organizations from the ten countries of the Nile Basin which seeks positive influence overthe development of projects and programs under the NBI and other Nile-related programs.

AVAILABLE DATABASES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY PERTINENT TO THE NBI

The discussion on research needs to support the NBI projects’ emphasise on the need for goodquality data by almost all the NBI projects. Availability of the data in the basin has been a chal-lenge for planning, development, management and research projects. In addition to national data-bases built by riparian states, a number of organizations have been active in building databases ofdifferent types within the Nile Basin. The section titled ‘Pertinent Databases to the NBI’, whichis given below presents a list of temporal and spatial databases currently being built by severalpartners/organizations. And the section titled ‘Bibliography on the Nile Research’ gives a list ofsome of the literature citations on Nile Basin research.

Pertinent Databases to the NBI

FAONile Databases: http://www.faonile.org/whatwedo/database.htm: This is a part of theFAONile projects. It includes scattered databases from a host of different institutions organized atnational level in a comprehensive georeferenced Nile Basin database. A large set of hydrologicand meteorological data has been quality controlled and transferred into an electronic format. Pleaserefer Table A4.5 for further information on the databases.

IWMI-IDIS http://dw.iwmi.org/dataplatform/home.aspx: The Integrated Database InformationSystem (IDIS) is an on-line data sharing platform that provides access to water, agriculture andenvironment data on several basins, including the Nile.

IWMI-DSP http://www.iwmidsp.org/iwmi/info/main.asp: The Data Storehouse Pathways of IWMIcontains large volumes of multi-temporal data from multiple satellite sensors, which were used inseveral IWMI research projects, including: Global Irrigated Area Mapping GIAM.

FAO Land and Water http://www.fao.org/ag/agl/lwris.stm: The Land and Water DevelopmentDivision of FAO operates a number of databases, e.g., :AQUASTAT — Global Information Systemof Water and Agriculture; CLIMWAT — Climatic Database to be used with CROPWAT; DigitalSoil Map of the World; Land Degradation Assessment for Dry lands (LADA); Land-water Linkagesin Rural Watersheds; among others.

ILRI-GIS www.ilri.cgiar.org/gis/igis.asp: Is a database related to livestock distribution, health andproduction. Other layers, however, cover more general topics such as human population density,climate and infrastructure. Some of the datasets cover only a specific project, while others arecounty-wide, regional, continental or even global.

TIGER http://www.tiger.esa.int/EOdata.asp: Is an initiative by the European Satellite Agency—toassist African countries on collection, analysis and dissemination of water related geo-informationdata. The project offers numerous spatial data on different sources.

11

FEWS NET http://earlywarning.usgs.gov/adds/: The Famine Early Warning System Network(FEWS NET) produces information for disaster and crisis prediction. The program monitorsnumerous data and information—including remotely sensed as well as ground-based data onmeteorological, crop, and rangeland conditions.

IFPRI http://www.ifpri.org/data/data_menu.asp: Includes databases on: Geospatial Datasets ofAgro-MAPS; Global Rural-Urban Mapping (GRUMP); Agroecosystems Dataset, among others.

CGIAR-CSI http://www.csi.cgiar.org/index.asp: The Consortium for Spatial Information links allof the CGIAR’s GIS/RS laboratories, and many geospatial scientists and researchers. It includesdatabases on population, poverty, climate, soil, crops, livestock, transportation, biodiversity and othergeospatial Global Public Goods.

FishBase http://www.worldfishcenter.org/cms/list_article.aspx?catID=42&ddlID=65: WorldFishCenter is having the FishBase database, which provides detailed information on most of the knownworld fish species.

There are many other databases that include valuable data on the Nile that have not beencovered as above, e.g., University of East Anglia, Global Runoff Data Centre, Tropical RainfallMeasuring Mission, Earth Observing System Data Gateway of NASA, among others.

Bibliography on the Nile Research

This section aims at reviewing some of the popular bibliography on the Nile. The list cannot beclaimed complete. The idea is to present main bibliography information, and famous books on theNile. These may include references to a wide range of literature and research on the Nile.

The River Nile and Its Economic, Political, Social and Cultural Role. An AnnotatedBibliography by Terje Tvedt: The book includes an extensive, multidisciplinary bibliography onthe Nile of 3,490 entries. It is organized in eight categories: (1) Political and Cultural History;(2) Fisheries; (3) Flora and Fauna; (4) Health; (5) Physical Characteristics; (6) Projects and Reports;(7) Travel and Exploration; and (8) Water Use and Water Management.http://www.global.uib.no/home/index.php?module=article&view=36&page_num=4

Cornell Blue Nile: Is a website recently developed by the Cornel University to organize informationabout hydrological modeling in the Nile River Basin. It includes a reference list of journal articleson the Nile hydrology, sediment, and other aspects. The site is protected by a user name andpassword. http://nile.cornell.drfuka.net/

Nile Hydrology by J.V. Sutcliffe and Y.P Parks: IAHS Special Publication No. 5, 1999: Thisbook describes the Nile Basin in its historical setting and the hydrology. The book also includesmean hydrological data on key variables at key locations in the basin. http://cerf-jcr.org/Books/Nile.htm

The Nile: Sharing A Scarce Resource by P.P. Howell, Published by Cambridge UniversityPress in1994: This is a historical and technical review of water management and of economicaland legal issues.http://www.cambridge.org/us/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=0521450403

12

The Nile Basin Volumes: These are the first series of literature on the Nile. It includes volumesfrom I to XI containing data series and description of the hydrological characteristics of the Nilebasin and subbasins including general information on meteorology, topography, conservationprojects etc.

HYDROMET (http://www.nilebasin.org//library.htm): The HYDROMET project was initiated byWMO in 1968 to collect information related to hydro-meteorological data linked to the White Nile.Reports and other outputs of the project are available in the NBI Nile-Sec library, Entebbe, Uganda.

TECCONILE Atlas (http://www.nilebasin.org//library.htm): The Technical Cooperation Committeefor the Promotion of the Development and Environmental has participated in the preparation of anatlas of the Nile Basin, which includes different types of data.

Nile 2002 Conference Series (http://www.nilebasin.org//library.htm): A series of conferences thatwas started in 1993 and concluded in 2002. The proceedings encompassed a wealth of informationon Nile technical issues.

DISCUSSIONS

It has been increasingly recognized that the Nile Basin Initiative program needs research tocomplement optimal implementation of the Shared Vision and Subsidiary Action projects. Similarly,research organizations working in the region acknowledge the many shared objectives they holdwith the NBI program. These, actually initiated the notion of creating synergies and partnershipsamong research institutions and the NBI to ensure that the best available knowledge is made useof when making policies, investment and strategies.

An intensive consultation has been completed with all NBI, SVP and SAP projects (exceptRegional Power Trade and CBSI). The discussion focused on exploring research questions directlyimpacting NBI projects. This has been further refined in a larger workshop attended by NBI projectsas well as research organizations actively working in the Nile research.

Many topics have been raised for research, and prioritized through group discussions on fourthematic areas: (1) Water Resources; (2) Agriculture; (3) Environment; and SocioeconomicDevelopment; and (4) Benefit Sharing. Research topics of high relevance have been summarizedin Appendix 2, including research on data availability, climate, agriculture, water resources, landuse, socioeconomics (benefits and benefits sharing), policies and institutions.

The discussion on how to support the NBI through research and capacity building was startedin September 2004 at a workshop in Entebbe, whereby NBI and research centers including IWMIdiscussed on how to collaborate in research and capacity building. The project on creatingsynergies on research among research centers and the NBI, which started early 2006 wascompleted early 2007.

What is next, after identifying research topics pertinent to the NBI projects, has been animportant question right from the start. The list of questions is available to the research communityand anyone can make use of it. In fact, as we have seen, a lot is already undergoing with regardto land and water resources research in the Nile. However, it is strongly recognized that creating

13

synergies and partnerships among research community and the NBI would optimally benefit theNBI program, as well as the research community. A suggestion has been made and discussedduring the project workshop that was held in February 2007, to enforce a ‘Steering Committee(SC)’, as a governance body to continue coordinating research efforts that support the NBI projects.The SC is chaired by the Nile-SEC, while IWMI provides the secretariat. Potential members ofthe SC would be ASARECA-SWMnet, FAONile, relevant SVP project managers, ENSAP,NELSAP, and Civil Society representatives. The main role of the SC is to provide strategic guidanceand coordination on research activities directly pertinent to NBI. In sum, efforts should continueto support the SC, as well as for research projects to ensure coordination/collaboration isstrengthened among partners, and also mobilize partnerships to further use the research results.

REFERENCES

Moustafa, M.; Gichuki, F. 2003. Draft edition. The Nile Basin profile: Strategic research for enhancing agriculturalwater productivity. Challenge Program on Water and Food.

Mohamed, Y.A.; van den Hurk, B.J.J.M.; Savenije, H.H.G.; Bastiaanssenb, W.G.M. 2005, The Nile Hydro-climatology:Results from a regional climate model, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 9: 263–278.

NBI project reports; http://www.nilebasin.org/resources.htm

Okidi, C.O. 1990. History of the Nile and Lake Victoria Basins through Treaties, in The Nile: Resource evaluation,resource management, hydropolitics and legal issues, edited by P.P. Howell and J.A. Allan.

Smith, M. 1993. CLIMWAT for CROPWAT - A climatic database for irrigation planning and management, FAOIrrigation and Drainage Paper No. 49, Rome, Italy: FAO. p. 113.

Waterbury, J. 1979. Hydropolitics of the Nile Valley. Syracuse, USA: Syracuse University Press. p. 301.

14

App

endi

x 1.

The

Nil

e B

asin

Ini

tiat

ive

AP

PE

ND

IX A

1.1:

Sum

mar

y of

the

SV

P P

roje

ct P

ortfo

lio.

Pro

ject

Obj

ecti

veD

escr

ipti

onS

tatu

s

Nil

e T

rans

boun

dary

Pro

vide

a s

trat

egic

fra

mew

ork

for

Iden

tify

ing

envi

ronm

enta

l an

d de

velo

pmen

t sy

nerg

ies

cont

ribu

ting

Bei

ng t

he f

irst

has

mad

e

Env

iron

men

tal

Act

ion

envi

ronm

enta

lly

sust

aina

ble

to s

usta

inab

le d

evel

opm

ent

oppo

rtun

itie

s w

ill

be a

n im

port

ant

task

.si

gnif

ican

t pr

ogre

ss i

n

deve

lopm

ent

of t

he N

ile

Riv

er B

asin

Impr

ove

unde

rsta

ndin

g of

the

rel

atio

nshi

ps o

f w

ater

res

ourc

esim

plem

enti

ng t

he p

lann

ed

deve

lopm

ent

and

the

envi

ronm

ent

in t

he b

asin

acti

viti

es

Nil

e B

asin

Reg

iona

lE

stab

lish

the

ins

titu

tion

al m

eans

The

pre

sent

lim

ited

dev

elop

men

t of

nat

iona

l po

wer

sys

tem

sS

igni

fica

nt p

rogr

ess

has

been

Pow

er T

rade

to c

oord

inat

e th

e de

velo

pmen

t of

in t

he b

asin

im

pose

s a

cons

trai

nt o

n th

e ex

ploi

tati

on o

f th

ese

mad

e in

eac

h of

the

regi

onal

pow

er m

arke

ts a

mon

gre

sour

ces

at a

ffor

dabl

e co

sts

at t

he n

atio

nal

leve

l. T

hese

con

stra

ints

com

pone

nts

the

Nil

e B

asin

cou

ntri

eson

sup

plyi

ng a

ffor

dabl

e po

wer

cou

ld b

e ov

erco

me

by e

xpan

ding

the

mar

ket

for

thes

e re

sour

ces

by d

evel

opin

g po

wer

tra

de a

mon

g

Nil

e B

asin

cou

ntri

es

Eff

icie

nt W

ater

Use

Pro

vide

a s

ound

con

cept

ual

and

Irri

gati

on i

s th

e do

min

ant

hum

an u

se o

f w

ater

in

the

basi

n an

d th

atB

eing

the

las

t, p

roje

ct

for

Agr

icul

tura

lpr

acti

cal

basi

s to

inc

reas

eag

ricu

ltur

e is

an

impo

rtan

t el

emen

t of

the

eco

nom

ies

of a

ll r

ipar

ian

pers

onne

l ar

e in

pla

ce

Pro

duct

ion

avai

labi

lity

and

eff

icie

nt u

se o

fco

untr

ies

in t

erm

s of

em

ploy

men

t, e

xpor

ts,

and

cont

ribu

tion

to

and

proj

ect

acti

viti

es

wat

er f

or a

gric

ultu

ral

prod

ucti

onG

DP

. H

ence

, th

e ju

dici

ous

use

of t

his

reso

urce

in

the

sect

or i

s cr

itic

alar

e pi

ckin

g up

Wat

er R

esou

rces

Enh

ance

the

ana

lyti

cal

capa

city

Com

pone

nts

of w

ater

res

ourc

es m

anag

emen

t th

at h

elp

in f

urth

erin

gA

ll t

he s

taff

bei

ng

Pla

nnin

g an

dfo

r ba

sin

wid

e pe

rspe

ctiv

e to

sup

port

coop

erat

ion

incl

ude

effe

ctiv

e po

lici

es a

nd i

mpl

emen

tati

on s

trat

egie

s,in

pla

ce t

he p

roje

ct i

s

Man

agem

ent

the

deve

lopm

ent,

man

agem

ent,

proj

ect

plan

ning

and

man

agem

ent

skil

ls,

and

com

mun

icat

ion

and

oper

atin

g at

ful

l ca

paci

ty

and

prot

ecti

on o

f N

ile

Bas

in w

ater

sde

cisi

on m

akin

g to

ols

Con

fide

nce

Bui

ldin

gD

evel

op c

onfi

denc

e in

reg

iona

l co

oper

atio

nC

onfi

denc

e in

reg

iona

l co

oper

atio

n an

d fu

ll s

take

hold

er i

nvol

vem

ent

Var

ious

typ

es o

f w

orks

hops

and

and

Sta

keho

lder

unde

r th

e N

BI,

bot

h at

bas

in a

nd l

ocal

lev

els,

are

prer

equi

site

s to

sus

tain

able

soc

ioec

onom

ic d

evel

opm

ent

and

trai

ning

are

bei

ng c

ondu

cted

by

Invo

lvem

ent

and

ensu

re f

ull

stak

ehol

der

invo

lvem

ent

pove

rty

redu

ctio

nth

e pr

ojec

t

in t

he N

BI

and

its

proj

ects

App

lied

Tra

inin

gS

tren

gthe

n ca

paci

ty i

n se

lect

ed s

ubje

ctM

ost

of t

he b

asin

cou

ntri

es a

re b

urde

ned

by w

eak

hum

an a

ndA

num

ber

of t

rain

ing

cour

ses,

area

s of

IW

RM

, st

reng

then

cen

ters

wit

hin

stit

utio

nal

capa

city

to

man

age

wat

er r

esou

rces

in

an i

nteg

rate

dse

min

ars,

lon

g-te

rm t

rain

ing,

capa

city

to

deve

lop

and

deli

ver

prog

ram

sm

anne

r. T

his

situ

atio

n ap

plie

s no

t on

ly t

o th

e m

anag

emen

t of

curr

icul

um d

evel

opm

ent

are

on a

con

tinu

ing

basi

sin

tern

atio

nal

wat

ers

but

also

to

man

agem

ent

of n

atio

nal

wat

ers

bein

g co

nduc

ted

Soc

ioec

onom

icS

tren

gthe

n N

ile

Riv

er b

asin

wid

eB

road

er c

oope

rati

on c

ould

ena

ble

enha

nced

int

ra-r

egio

nal

trad

e an

dA

ltho

ugh

the

proj

ect

star

ted

Dev

elop

men

t an

dso

cioe

cono

mic

coo

pera

tion

and

prom

ote

inve

stm

ent

in t

he r

egio

n’s

infr

astr

uctu

re,

such

as

road

s,la

te a

ctiv

itie

s of

the

pro

ject

are

Ben

efit

Sha

ring

inte

grat

ion

rail

, an

d te

leco

m l

inks

tha

t co

uld

incr

ease

the

pro

duct

ivit

y of

pick

ing

up

all

coun

trie

s w

ithi

n th

e re

gion

and

all

ow t

hem

to

deve

lop

mor

e

rapi

dly

and

trad

e m

ore

effe

ctiv

ely

both

wit

hin

and

beyo

nd t

he r

egio

n

15

AP

PE

ND

IX A

1.2:

EN

SA

P P

roje

cts

Por

tfolio

.

Pro

ject

Obj

ecti

veD

escr

ipti

onS

tatu

s

Eas

tern

Nil

eT

o id

enti

fy,

prep

are,

and

im

plem

ent

Pro

vide

s a

com

mon

ana

lyti

cal

basi

s fo

r id

enti

fyin

g an

d as

sess

ing

Ong

oing

at

full

pac

e

Pla

nnin

g M

odel

coop

erat

ive

deve

lopm

ent

proj

ects

tha

top

tion

s, q

uant

ifyi

ng b

enef

its

and

impa

cts,

eva

luat

ing

trad

eoff

s,

Sub

-Pro

ject

prov

ide

mut

ual

bene

fits

in

the

Eas

tern

Nil

ean

d an

alyz

ing

and

man

agin

g in

form

atio

n

Flo

od P

repa

redn

ess

To

redu

ce d

amag

e fr

om m

ajor

flo

ods,

The

pro

ject

inc

lude

s: a

sses

smen

t of

flo

od r

isk

and

vuln

erab

ilit

y,P

roje

ct p

repa

rati

on i

s in

and

Ear

ly W

arni

ngan

d to

inc

reas

e th

e be

nefi

ts f

rom

exc

ess

deve

lop

a fl

ood

fore

cast

ing

syst

em,

iden

tify

opt

ions

for

enh

anci

ngpr

ogre

ss,

pre-

appr

aisa

l re

port

Sub

-Pro

ject

floo

d w

ater

s, i

n th

e E

N c

ount

ries

floo

d m

itig

atio

n.p

rep

ared

Bar

o-A

ko

bo

The

Bar

o-A

kobo

Bas

in p

roje

ct p

rovi

des

aT

he m

ulti

-pur

pose

pro

ject

int

ends

to

prov

ide:

hyd

ropo

wer

gen

erat

ion,

Dis

cuss

ion

wit

h fu

ndin

g ag

ency

Mul

ti-p

urpo

se W

ater

pote

ntia

l op

port

unit

y to

dev

elop

a m

ulti

-pur

pose

irri

gati

on d

evel

opm

ent,

flo

od m

anag

emen

t, i

ncre

ased

wat

er y

ield

,is

goi

ng o

n, r

evis

ed T

OR

is

Res

ourc

es D

evel

opm

ent

wat

er r

esou

rces

pro

ject

, w

hich

may

pro

vide

env

iron

men

tal

prot

ecti

on a

nd e

nhan

ced

wat

ersh

ed m

anag

emen

tp

rep

ared

Sub

-Pro

ject

win

-win

ben

efit

s to

the

Eas

tern

Nil

e co

untr

ies

Eth

iopi

a-S

udan

To

prom

ote

regi

onal

pow

er t

rade

thr

ough

Con

stru

ctio

n of

a t

rans

mis

sion

int

erco

nnec

tion

bet

wee

n E

thio

pia

Upd

atin

g of

the

fea

sibi

lity

stu

dy

Tra

nsm

issi

onco

ordi

nate

d pl

anni

ng a

nd d

evel

opm

ent

of p

ower

and

Sud

an,

taki

ng i

nto

cons

ider

atio

n fu

ture

pow

er t

rade

wit

h

Inte

rcon

nect

ion

proj

ects

and

tra

nsm

issi

on i

nter

conn

ecti

onE

gypt

and

pos

sibl

y ot

her

coun

trie

s

Sub

-Pro

ject

*

Eas

tern

Nil

eT

o in

itia

te t

he d

evel

opm

ent

of a

reg

iona

lT

o in

itia

te a

n in

vest

men

t pr

ogra

m t

hat

prio

riti

zes

hydr

opow

erC

onsu

ltan

t hi

ring

is

in p

rogr

ess

Pow

er T

rade

pow

er t

rade

gen

erat

ion

and

deve

lopm

ent

and

tran

smis

sion

int

erco

nnec

tion

inv

estm

ents

for

proj

ect

prep

arat

ion

Inve

stm

ent

Pro

gram

inve

stm

ent

prog

ram

in t

he E

aste

rn N

ile

regi

on

Irri

gati

on a

ndT

o in

crea

se a

gric

ultu

ral

prod

ucti

vity

To

supp

ort

the

deve

lopm

ent

and

expa

nsio

n of

irr

igat

ed a

gric

ultu

re,

Con

sult

ant

hiri

ng f

or p

roje

ct

Dra

inag

eth

roug

h ir

riga

tion

dev

elop

men

tas

wel

l as

to

impr

ove

the

prod

ucti

vity

of

larg

e-sc

ale

prep

arat

ion

is i

n pr

ogre

ss

Sub

-Pro

ject

agri

cult

ure

thro

ugh

impr

oved

agr

icul

tura

l w

ater

use

Wat

ersh

edT

o es

tabl

ish

a fr

amew

ork

for

the

The

pro

ject

is

expe

cted

to

lead

to:

inc

reas

ed l

and

prod

ucti

vity

,D

raft

rep

ort

prep

ared

Man

agem

ent

man

agem

ent

of

sele

cted

wat

ersh

eds

redu

ced

sedi

men

t lo

ad,

pove

rty

alle

viat

ion

Sub

-Pro

ject

on t

he E

aste

rn N

ile

(EN

)

Join

t M

ulti

-pur

pose

Lau

nch

the

firs

t ph

ase

of i

dent

ific

atio

nA

‘sc

opin

g st

udy’

has

bee

n in

itia

ted

to s

uppo

rt t

he p

roce

ss b

yIm

prov

emen

t of

the

kno

wle

dge-

Pro

ject

of a

maj

or p

rogr

am o

f m

ulti

-pur

pose

prov

idin

g in

form

atio

n on

key

mul

ti-p

urpo

se o

ppor

tuni

ties

in

the

base

and

ref

inem

ent

of t

he

join

t de

velo

pmen

t of

the

Eas

tern

Nil

eE

aste

rn N

ile

that

cou

ld f

orm

par

t of

a J

oint

Mul

ti-p

urpo

se P

roje

ctm

od

els

Eth

iopi

a-S

udan

To

prom

ote

regi

onal

pow

er t

rade

Con

stru

ctio

n of

a t

rans

mis

sion

int

erco

nnec

tion

bet

wee

n E

thio

pia

Upd

atin

g of

the

fea

sibi

lity

Tra

nsm

issi

onth

roug

h co

ordi

nate

d pl

anni

ng a

ndan

d S

udan

, ta

king

int

o co

nsid

erat

ion

futu

re p

ower

tra

de w

ith

Egy

ptst

udy

Inte

rcon

nect

ion

deve

lopm

ent

of p

ower

pro

ject

s an

dan

d po

ssib

ly o

ther

cou

ntri

es

Sub

-Pro

ject

*tr

ansm

issi

on i

nter

conn

ecti

on

16

AP

PE

ND

IX A

1.3:

NE

LSA

P P

roje

ct P

ortfo

lio.

NE

L-C

OM

Pri

orit

y A

rea

Pro

ject

Cou

ntri

esD

escr

ipti

on

1.

Wat

er U

se i

n A

gric

ultu

reE

nhan

ced

Agr

icul

ture

Bur

undi

, D

R C

ongo

The

reg

iona

l ag

ricu

ltur

e pr

ogra

m,

whi

ch i

s un

der

prep

arat

ion,

wil

l pr

omot

e op

port

unit

ies

Pro

duct

ivit

y P

roje

ctK

enya

for

coop

erat

ion

in t

he N

ile

Bas

in t

hrou

gh p

riva

te i

nves

tmen

t, p

ubli

c-pr

ivat

e pa

rtne

rshi

psR

wan

daan

d en

hanc

ed t

rade

thr

ough

inc

reas

ed i

nves

tmen

t, i

ncom

e ge

nera

tion

and

pro

-poo

rT

anza

nia

grow

th.

Fin

anci

ng f

or t

his

proj

ect

is n

ot y

et s

ecur

edU

gan

da

2.

Sus

tain

able

Man

agem

ent

Fis

heri

es P

roje

ct f

or L

ake

DR

Con

goT

he o

bjec

tive

of

the

proj

ect

is t

o es

tabl

ish

a su

stai

nabl

e fr

amew

ork

for

the

join

tan

d C

onse

rvat

ion

ofA

lber

t an

d L

ake

Edw

ard

Ug

and

am

anag

emen

t of

the

fis

heri

es i

n L

ake

Alb

ert

and

Lak

e E

dwar

d to

im

prov

e th

e li

ving

Lak

es a

nd W

etla

nds

Eg

yp

tco

ndit

ion

of t

he p

eopl

e an

d to

pro

tect

the

env

iron

men

tS

udan

3.

Wat

ersh

ed M

anag

emen

tD

evel

opm

ent

of a

Fra

mew

ork

Ken

yaT

he o

bjec

tive

of

the

proj

ect

is t

o es

tabl

ish

a su

stai

nabl

e fr

amew

ork

for

the

join

tfo

r C

o-op

erat

ive

Man

agem

ent

Tan

zani

am

anag

emen

t of

the

wat

er r

esou

rces

of

the

Mar

a R

iver

Bas

in,

in o

rder

to

prep

are

for

of t

he M

ara

Riv

er B

asin

sust

aina

ble

deve

lopm

ent

orie

nted

inv

estm

ents

Wat

er R

esou

rces

Kag

era

Riv

er B

asin

Bu

run

di

The

obj

ecti

ve o

f th

e pr

ojec

t is

to

deve

lop

tool

s an

d a

perm

anen

t in

stit

utio

n fo

r th

e jo

int,

Inte

grat

ed W

ater

Res

ourc

esR

wan

dasu

stai

nabl

e m

anag

emen

t of

the

wat

er r

esou

rces

in

the

Kag

era

Riv

er B

asin

.M

anag

emen

tT

anza

niaU

gand

a

Dev

elop

men

t of

a F

ram

ewor

kK

enya

The

obj

ecti

ve o

f th

e pr

ojec

t is

to

reve

rse

the

envi

ronm

enta

l de

grad

atio

n tr

ends

in

the

for

Co-

oper

ativ

e M

anag

emen

tU

gan

da

catc

hmen

ts b

y su

ppor

ting

the

rur

al c

omm

unit

ies

in a

dopt

ing

appr

opri

ate

tech

nolo

gies

in

of t

he M

alak

isi-

Mal

aba-

Sio

catc

hmen

t m

anag

emen

tR

iver

Bas

in W

ater

Res

ourc

es

4.

Wat

er H

yaci

nth

and

Wat

er H

yaci

nth

Aba

tem

ent

Bu

run

di

The

obj

ecti

ve o

f th

e pr

ojec

t is

to

elim

inat

e ad

vers

e ef

fect

s on

env

iron

men

t, h

ealt

h an

dW

ater

Wee

d C

ontr

olin

the

Kag

era

Riv

er B

asin

Rw

anda

soci

oeco

nom

ic a

ctiv

itie

s th

at a

re c

ause

d by

wat

er h

yaci

nth

infe

stat

ion,

by

redu

cing

to

Tan

zani

a U

gand

am

anag

eabl

e le

vels

the

inf

esta

tion

of

wat

er h

yaci

nth

in t

he K

ager

a R

iver

bas

inS

udan

Eg

yp

t

5.

Hy

dro

po

wer

A R

usum

o F

alls

Bu

run

di

The

obj

ecti

ve o

f th

e pr

ojec

t is

to

supp

ly n

ew e

nerg

y an

d ca

paci

ty t

o th

e ex

isti

ng p

ower

Sub

-pro

gram

1H

ydro

-Ele

ctri

c P

ower

Rw

anda

grid

bas

ed o

n re

new

able

hyd

ropo

wer

ene

rgy,

to

fost

er i

nter

nati

onal

coo

pera

tion

in

Hyd

ropo

wer

Dev

elop

men

tD

evel

opm

ent,

HE

PT

anza

nia

hydr

opow

er p

roje

ct d

evel

opm

ent,

and

to

elec

trif

y ne

w a

reas

and

im

prov

e re

gion

al p

ower

supp

ly r

elia

bili

ty b

y in

terc

onne

ctin

g th

e po

wer

net

wor

ks o

f D

RC

-Eas

t/ B

urun

di/

Rw

anda

and

the

nati

onal

net

wor

k of

Tan

zani

a

Sub

-pro

gram

2R

egio

nal

Tra

nsm

issi

onB

uru

nd

iA

fea

sibi

lity

and

des

ign

stud

y fo

r si

x po

wer

tra

nsm

issi

on l

ines

bet

wee

n B

urun

di,

DR

C,

Tra

nsm

issi

onF

easi

bili

ty I

nter

conn

ecti

onR

wan

daK

enya

, R

wan

da a

nd U

gand

a is

bei

ng c

arri

ed o

ut f

or f

utur

e st

reng

then

ing

of t

he e

xist

ing

Inte

rcon

nect

ion

Stu

dyT

anza

nia

Uga

nda

and

new

int

erco

nnec

tion

s be

twee

n th

e N

EL

cou

ntri

es a

nd t

o ot

her

regi

onal

gri

dsS

udan

Eg

yp

t

Con

tinue

d

17

AP

PE

ND

IX A

1.3:

NE

LSA

P P

roje

ct P

ortfo

lio.

(con

tinue

d)

NE

L-C

OM

Pri

orit

y A

rea

Pro

ject

Cou

ntri

esD

escr

ipti

on

Str

ateg

ic S

ecto

ral

Soc

ial

and

Bu

run

di

The

obj

ecti

ve i

s to

pre

pare

an

indi

cati

ve N

EL

SA

P P

ower

Mas

ter

Pla

n to

ass

ist

the

NE

LS

AP

Env

iron

men

tal

Ass

essm

ent

ofR

wan

dari

pari

an c

ount

ries

in

sele

ctin

g be

st p

ower

sup

ply

opti

ons

and

regi

onal

tra

nsm

issi

on i

nter

Pow

er D

evel

opm

ent

opti

ons

Tan

zani

a U

gand

aco

nnec

tion

Sud

anE

gy

pt

6.

NE

L-C

oord

inat

ion

Uni

tC

oord

inat

ion

Bu

run

di

The

pro

ject

pro

vide

s in

stit

utio

n an

d ca

paci

ty b

uild

ing

fund

s to

NE

LS

AP

-CU

. T

he m

embe

r(N

EL

-CU

)R

wan

daco

untr

ies

are

curr

entl

y se

ekin

g fu

nds

for

a fo

llow

-up

on r

efin

emen

t N

EL

SA

P-C

UT

anza

nia

Uga

nda

inst

itut

iona

l su

ppor

t pr

ojec

t fo

r th

e ne

xt 4

yea

rs t

o su

ppor

t th

e N

EL

SA

P S

cali

ng U

p S

trat

egy

Sud

anE

gy

pt

18

Ap

pen

dix

2.

Res

earc

h T

opic

s P

erti

nen

t to

th

e N

BI

Pro

ject

s

No

.R

esea

rch

Pro

blem

Res

earc

h A

rea

and

Pos

sibl

e R

esea

rch

Que

stio

ns a

nd O

utpu

tsR

elev

ance

to

NB

I P

roje

cts

Obj

ecti

ves

Sca

rcit

y of

dat

a in

the

Dat

a P

rovi

sion

of

data

1.

Wha

t to

ols

and

met

hods

are

ava

ilab

le f

or f

illi

ng i

n da

ta g

aps

and

how

can

the

yT

he d

ata

on n

atur

alN

ile

Bas

in:

on t

he n

atur

al r

esou

rces

be e

ffec

tive

ly u

tili

zed

to a

llev

iate

dat

a co

nstr

aint

s in

im

plem

enti

ng N

BI

proj

ects

?re

sour

ces

syst

em1

.D

ata

on b

ioph

ysic

alsy

stem

and

use

s to

fil

l in

-T

ools

and

met

hods

for

cos

t-ef

fect

ive

data

col

lect

ion

of w

ater

qua

lity

and

(e.g

., hy

dro-

met

eoro

logi

cal

reso

urce

s (l

ands

, w

ater

,(n

otic

eabl

e) d

ata

gaps

quan

tity

, fo

r ex

ampl

e, s

impl

e m

etho

ds o

f sa

mpl

ing

the

mai

n w

ater

qua

lity

data

) ar

e ba

sic

inpu

t fo

rhy

drom

eteo

rolo

gy,

etc.

)w

ithi

n th

e ba

sin,

in

para

met

ers

usin

g bi

o-in

dica

tors

all

catc

hmen

t an

d ri

ver

2.

Dat

a on

part

icul

ar i

n th

e up

per

-U

tili

zati

on o

f m

oder

n te

chni

ques

suc

h as

sat

elli

te,

rada

r, m

odel

s, a

nd d

ata

mod

els

used

by

diff

eren

t1

.so

cioe

cono

mic

act

ivit

ies

part

s, i

nclu

ding

dat

a on

assi

mil

atio

n te

chni

ques

to

fill

in

data

gap

sN

BI

proj

ects

: W

ater

shed

,(p

opul

atio

n,ac

tual

use

and

-U

se o

f is

otop

e hy

drol

ogy

to g

ener

ate

and

veri

fy h

ydro

met

eoro

logi

cal

DS

S,

agri

cult

ure,

live

liho

od,

land

use

,pe

rfor

man

cein

form

atio

nfl

ood

fore

cast

ing,

etc

.w

ater

use

, et

c.)

Dat

a on

soc

ioec

onom

ics

2.

How

can

the

dat

a ge

nera

ted

usin

g th

e ab

ove

tool

s be

mad

e pa

rt o

f an

int

egra

ted

data

(pop

ulat

ion,

lan

d an

d w

ater

and

info

rmat

ion

syst

em a

nd u

sed

to v

alid

ate

hydr

olog

ical

and

wat

er q

uali

ty p

roce

sses

?us

es,

prod

ucti

vity

,pe

rfor

man

ce,

etc)

are

3.

How

can

we

ensu

re t

hat

the

info

rmat

ion

user

s ha

ve c

onfi

denc

e in

the

dat

a us

ed,

need

ed b

y pl

anni

ngth

e an

alys

is,

and

that

the

ana

lyti

cal

tool

s ai

d in

pro

duci

ng c

redi

ble

info

rmat

ion?

mod

els

SD

BS

, C

BS

I, e

tc.

Cli

mat

e ch

ange

, cl

imat

eH

ydro

clim

atol

ogy:

1.

How

are

dif

fere

nt p

arts

of

the

rive

r ba

sin

affe

cted

by

clim

ate

vari

abil

ity

and

chan

ge?

The

out

put

of t

hese

vari

abil

ity,

vul

nera

bili

ty,

Impr

ove

asse

ssm

ent

ofA

nd w

hat

inst

itut

iona

l se

t up

(po

licy

, le

gal

and

orga

niza

tion

s),

prog

ram

s an

d pr

ojec

tsre

sear

ches

is

esse

ntia

lim

pact

s, a

nd a

dapt

atio

ncl

imat

e ch

ange

and

wou

ld b

e re

quir

ed t

o re

duce

vul

nera

bili

ty,

nega

tive

im

pact

s an

d bu

ild

loca

l an

din

form

atio

n th

at i

s re

quir

edre

quir

emen

tscl

imat

e va

riab

ilit

y.ba

sins

cap

acit

ies

to a

dapt

?by

alm

ost

all

the

NB

IIm

prov

e as

sess

men

t of

-A

sses

smen

t of

cli

mat

e ch

ange

and

cli

mat

e va

riab

ilit

y to

red

uce

unce

rtai

nty

proj

ects

, in

par

ticu

lar,

by

vuln

erab

ilit

y of

res

ourc

e(e

.g.,

cc

com

puta

tion

s, f

requ

ency

ana

lysi

s of

flo

ods

and

drou

ghts

, et

c.)

the

wat

er r

esou

rces

and

use

syst

ems

(lan

d an

d-

Ass

essm

ent

of i

mpa

cts

of c

lim

ate

chan

ge a

nd c

lim

ate

vari

abil

ity

onpr

ojec

ts:

agri

cult

ure,

SD

BS

,w

ater

)na

tura

l re

sour

ces

(e.g

., w

ater

res

ourc

es s

uppl

y an

d de

man

d, e

cosy

stem

s,an

d m

any

of t

he E

NS

AP

Impr

ove

asse

ssm

ent

ofag

ricu

ltur

al p

rodu

ctiv

ity,

etc

.).

and

NE

LS

AP

pro

ject

sim

pact

s on

tho

se s

yste

ms

-U

nder

stan

d vu

lner

abil

ity

of t

he d

iffe

rent

pro

duct

ion

syst

ems

2.

Rec

omm

enda

tion

to

-P

rovi

de g

uide

line

s an

d re

com

men

dati

ons

for

enha

nced

ada

ptiv

e ca

paci

ty a

nden

hanc

e ad

apta

tion

and

resi

lien

ce o

f so

cioe

cono

mic

s an

d m

anag

emen

t pr

acti

ces

to c

lim

ate

chan

ge a

ndco

ping

str

ateg

ies

clim

ate

vari

abil

ity

2.

Wha

t is

the

soc

ial,

eco

nom

ic a

nd e

nvir

onm

enta

l im

pact

of

floo

ds a

nd d

roug

hts

and

how

can

sho

rt-,

med

ium

- an

d lo

ng-t

erm

for

ecas

ting

con

trib

ute

to r

educ

ing

thei

rne

gati

ve i

mpa

cts?

3.

Wha

t is

the

im

pact

of

land

use

cha

nge

on t

he N

ile

regi

onal

cli

mat

e? H

ow d

oes

clim

ate

chan

ge a

ffec

t la

nd u

se?

How

doe

s cl

imat

e ch

ange

and

lan

d us

e af

fect

the

avai

labi

lity

and

qua

lity

of

surf

ace

and

grou

ndw

ater

res

ourc

es?

4.

Wha

t is

hyd

rocl

imat

olog

ical

lin

kage

of

the

diff

eren

t su

bbas

ins,

e.g

., t

he W

hite

and

Blu

e N

ile

rive

rs?

19

Con

tinue

d

Lim

ited

und

erst

andi

ng o

fW

ater

shed

Man

agem

ent

1.

Wha

t w

ater

shed

man

agem

ent

inte

rven

tion

s w

ould

red

uce

the

nega

tive

hyd

rolo

gic

and

The

kno

wle

dge

onbe

st p

ossi

ble

wat

ersh

edIm

prov

e un

ders

tand

ing

envi

ronm

enta

l im

pact

s on

dow

nstr

eam

par

ts o

f th

e ca

tchm

ents

/bas

in?

Wha

t ar

e th

eim

prov

ed w

ater

shed

man

agem

ent

and

the

of a

vail

able

wat

ersh

edtr

ade-

offs

and

how

can

the

y be

add

ress

ed?

man

agem

ent

is r

equi

red

inte

rlin

ked

impl

icat

ions

reso

urce

s-

Und

erst

andi

ng o

f th

e ro

ot c

ause

s of

lan

d de

grad

atio

n an

d ho

w t

o ad

dres

s th

emby

a n

umbe

r of

NB

IIm

prov

e un

ders

tand

ing

appr

opri

atel

ypr

ojec

ts.

Spe

cifi

call

yof

exi

stin

g pr

acti

ces

and

-H

ow t

o in

tegr

ate

mul

ti-s

ecto

r, m

ulti

-dis

cipl

inar

y is

sues

in

land

deg

rada

tion

rele

vant

to

wat

ersh

edne

eds

for

bett

er u

tili

zati

on.

anal

ysis

, e.

g.,

live

liho

od v

s. l

and

degr

adat

ion,

int

erac

tion

dom

esti

c-ag

ricu

ltur

alm

anag

emen

t pr

ojec

ts o

fId

enti

fy b

est

poss

ible

wat

er s

ecto

rs,

etc.

EN

SA

P a

nd N

EL

SA

P;

tow

ater

shed

man

agem

ent

-Im

prov

e as

sess

men

t of

lan

d de

grad

atio

n an

d it

s im

pact

s, e

.g.,

com

puta

tion

of

soil

EW

UA

on

agri

cult

ure

inte

rven

tion

s an

der

osio

n, a

nd t

he d

owns

trea

m i

mpl

icat

ions

of

rese

rvoi

r an

d ca

nal

sedi

men

tati

onsy

stem

s; a

nd o

n th

e3

.th

eir

impa

cts

-Im

prov

e un

ders

tand

ing

of h

ow t

o re

duce

/sto

p la

nd d

egra

dati

on,

and

its

nega

tive

im

pact

sec

osys

tem

par

t it

is

-R

esea

rch

on w

ater

har

vest

ing

rele

vant

to

NT

EA

P.

On

wat

er r

esou

rces

and

2.

Wha

t li

veli

hood

opt

ions

exi

st?

How

are

the

y af

fect

ed d

ue t

o la

nd a

nd w

ater

deg

rada

tion

?do

wns

trea

m i

mpl

icat

ion

it3

.W

hat

are

valu

es a

nd r

easo

ns f

or l

ow w

ater

pro

duct

ivit

y of

dif

fere

nt s

yste

ms:

far

min

g,is

rel

ated

to

the

WR

PM

live

stoc

k, e

tc?

How

can

wat

er p

rodu

ctiv

ity

be i

ncre

ased

? W

hat

are

the

trad

e-of

fs?

proj

ect

4.

Wha

t is

the

ena

blin

g en

viro

nmen

t (p

olic

ies,

ins

titu

tion

s, e

tc)

for

a su

cces

sful

wat

ersh

edpr

ojec

t?5

.W

hat

are

the

impr

oved

IW

RM

tec

hnol

ogie

s, a

naly

tica

l m

etho

ds a

nd t

ools

to

fost

erin

tegr

ated

wat

ersh

ed m

anag

emen

t fo

r pr

oduc

tivi

ty a

nd c

onse

rvat

ion

of a

gro-

ecos

yste

ms?

6.

How

to

up-s

cale

res

ults

der

ived

fro

m w

ater

shed

pil

ot s

ites

?7

.W

hat

are

the

best

tec

hnic

al,

poli

cy,

inst

itut

iona

l, m

anag

emen

t in

terv

enti

ons

that

coul

d be

use

d in

var

ious

pro

duct

ion

syst

ems?

8.

Wha

t is

the

im

pact

of

upst

ream

dev

elop

men

t on

aqu

atic

eco

syst

ems

and

the

good

san

d se

rvic

es t

hat

they

pro

vide

?

Low

wat

er p

rodu

ctiv

ity

Ass

essm

ent

of a

gric

ultu

ral

1.

How

can

we

bett

er m

anag

e w

ater

and

lan

d re

sour

ces

in t

he b

asin

to

enha

nce

econ

omic

Per

tine

nt t

o E

WU

Afr

om a

gric

ultu

re s

yste

ms

wat

er p

oten

tial

, us

e, a

ndde

velo

pmen

t, r

educ

e in

equi

ties

and

env

iron

men

tal

degr

adat

ion?

proj

ect,

and

to

wat

ersh

edpr

oduc

tivi

ty:

and

how

to

-M

appi

ng o

f ex

isti

ng/p

oten

tial

agr

icul

tura

l pr

oduc

tion

sys

tem

s (i

rrig

ated

, ra

in-f

ed,

man

agem

ent

proj

ects

, an

dim

prov

e th

e us

eli

vest

ock,

fis

heri

es,

etc.

)in

dire

ctly

to

NT

EA

P a

nd-

Ass

essm

ent

of w

ater

pro

duct

ivit

y of

the

dif

fere

nt s

yste

ms

(irr

igat

ion,

rai

n-fe

d,W

RP

M p

roje

cts

live

stoc

k, f

ishe

ries

, et

c),

and

anal

ysis

of

the

dete

rmin

ing

fact

ors

(tec

hnic

al,

poli

cies

, su

ppor

t co

ndit

ions

, ex

tern

alit

ies,

etc

.)-

Impa

ct a

sses

smen

t of

im

prov

ed w

ater

pro

duct

ivit

y on

liv

elih

ood

and

envi

ronm

ent

4.

(inc

ludi

ng h

ealt

h)-

Gui

deli

nes

and

fram

ewor

ks f

or i

mpr

oved

pro

duct

ivit

y, e

ffic

ienc

y, a

dequ

acy,

etc

.-

Iden

tify

ing

fact

ors

(env

iron

men

tal

and

soci

oeco

nom

ic)

infl

uenc

e fa

rmer

’sad

opti

on o

f im

prov

ed t

echn

olog

ies

and

man

agem

ent

prac

tice

s-

Rec

omm

end

syne

rgie

s be

twee

n di

ffer

ent

wat

er u

ses

to e

nhan

ce p

rodu

ctiv

ity,

whi

lst

mai

ntai

ning

or

impr

ovin

g en

viro

nmen

tal

secu

rity

2.

Are

the

re a

ny b

ette

r op

tion

s or

man

agem

ent

arra

ngem

ents

in

term

s of

sav

ing

and

effi

cien

tly

usin

g w

ater

and

lan

d re

sour

ces?

3.

How

do

we

reve

rse

adve

rse

effe

cts

such

as

sali

nity

, po

llut

ion,

env

iron

men

tal

and

heal

th i

mpa

cts

(pla

nnin

g, d

esig

n, p

olic

ies,

etc

.,)?

20

App

endi

x 2.

Res

earc

h T

opic

s P

erti

nent

to

the

NB

I P

roje

cts

(Con

tin

ued

)

No

.R

esea

rch

Pro

blem

Res

earc

h A

rea

and

Pos

sibl

e R

esea

rch

Que

stio

ns a

nd O

utpu

tsR

elev

ance

to

NB

I P

roje

cts

Obj

ecti

ves

Env

iron

men

tal

degr

adat

ion

En

vir

on

men

t1

.H

ow d

oes

chan

ges

in t

he s

tatu

s of

: fo

rest

, w

oodl

ands

, gr

assl

ands

, cr

opla

nds

and

Rel

evan

t to

SV

of

diff

eren

t ec

osys

tem

s,E

nvir

onm

enta

l re

sour

cew

etla

nds

affe

ct g

oods

and

ser

vice

s av

aila

ble

to l

ocal

and

dow

nstr

eam

com

mun

itie

sE

nvir

onm

ent,

and

wat

erin

clud

ing

wet

land

s,as

sess

men

t, s

tatu

s of

use

,2

.W

hat

tech

nica

l an

d in

stit

utio

nal

inte

rven

tion

s w

ould

be

requ

ired

to

atta

in a

ccep

tabl

ere

sour

ces

proj

ects

;ri

vers

, et

c.an

d ho

w t

o re

vers

ele

vels

of

envi

ronm

enta

l st

atus

?N

EL

SA

P L

akes

and

degr

adat

ion

3.

Wha

t is

the

sta

tus

of o

ur w

etla

nd r

esou

rces

and

how

can

the

y be

opt

imal

ly a

ndw

etla

nds

proj

ects

; E

NS

AP

sust

aina

bly

util

ized

:m

ulti

-pur

pose

pro

ject

s, e

tc.

-R

apid

ass

essm

ent

of t

he r

iver

eco

syst

em h

ealt

h-

Thr

eats

and

opp

ortu

niti

es o

f al

ien

aqua

tic

spec

ies

(fis

h an

d w

eeds

)-

Val

uati

on o

f la

kes

and

wet

land

s ec

osys

tem

res

ourc

es-

Ass

essm

ents

of

lake

s an

d w

etla

nds

for

mul

tipl

e us

es:

pove

rty

redu

ctio

n, a

ndec

osys

tem

ser

vice

s; H

ow t

o co

nsid

er e

nvir

onm

ent

cons

erva

tion

in

acco

rdan

cew

ith

sust

aina

ble

live

liho

od-

Ass

essm

ent

of e

nvir

onm

enta

l fl

ows

at k

ey l

ocat

ions

in

the

basi

n-

Ass

essm

ent

of i

mpa

cts

of i

nter

vent

ions

(ha

rd a

nd s

oft)

on

soci

oeco

nom

ies

(inc

ludi

ng h

ealt

h im

pact

s),

and

on e

cosy

stem

ser

vice

s4

.M

icro

-gra

nt p

roje

cts:

-W

hat

are

the

mos

t ap

prop

riat

e fu

ndin

g m

echa

nism

s fo

r co

mm

unit

y-ba

sed

proj

ects

(mic

ro-g

rant

pro

ject

s) a

nd h

ow c

an t

hey

be e

ffec

tive

ly i

mpl

emen

ted?

5.

-H

ow t

o li

nk m

icro

-gra

nt p

roje

cts

to n

atio

nal

plan

s of

rip

aria

n co

untr

ies,

and

how

to

upsc

ale

rese

arch

out

put

to n

atio

nal

or b

asin

sca

les?

-H

ow d

eepl

y ro

oted

are

the

NG

Os

to h

elp

loca

l co

mm

unit

ies?

Are

the

yre

pres

enta

tive

in

the

give

n lo

cali

ty,

area

, ca

tchm

ent?

5.

Wha

t is

the

env

iron

men

tal

poli

cy a

nd r

egul

ator

y fr

amew

ork

in d

iffe

rent

cou

ntri

es?

How

can

sec

tora

l po

lici

es i

n a

give

n co

untr

y be

bet

ter

inte

grat

ed a

nd h

ow c

an t

hey

be h

arm

oniz

ed b

asin

wid

e to

sup

port

im

plem

enta

tion

of

inte

rven

tion

s th

at a

chie

veN

BI

obje

ctiv

es?

-T

o w

hat

exte

nd i

s la

ck o

f in

form

atio

n af

fect

ing

poli

cym

akin

g in

env

iron

men

tal

issu

es?

-H

ow t

o co

ordi

nate

env

iron

men

tal

poli

cies

am

ong

ripa

rian

cou

ntri

es a

nd h

ow i

tw

ill

be a

t th

e ba

sin

leve

l. W

hat

is t

he i

mpa

ct o

f m

acro

-pol

icie

s on

the

env

iron

men

t?-

How

to

impl

emen

t re

sear

ch o

utpu

t in

rea

l li

fe s

itua

tion

s6

.W

hat

is t

he s

tatu

s of

our

fis

h an

d ot

her

aqua

tic

reso

urce

s an

d ho

w c

an t

hey

besu

stai

ned

and

enha

nced

to

supp

ort

live

liho

ods?

7.

Wha

t ar

e th

e im

pact

s of

poi

nt a

nd n

on-p

oint

pol

luta

nts

on w

ater

bod

ies,

eco

syst

eman

d hu

man

wel

fare

and

liv

elih

oods

and

how

can

neg

ativ

e im

pact

s be

min

imiz

ed?

8.

Com

para

tive

res

earc

h on

nut

riti

onal

, so

cial

and

eco

nom

ic v

alue

s of

aqu

atic

, cr

op a

ndli

vest

ock

for

smal

lhol

ders

9.

EIA

pro

cess

, ga

ps,

reco

mm

enda

tion

s an

d ha

rmon

izat

ion

of p

roce

ss1

0.H

ow t

o li

nk h

uman

and

env

iron

men

tal

heal

th

21

Soc

ioec

onom

ic d

evel

opm

ent

Soc

ioec

onom

ics

1.

Wha

t so

cioe

cono

mic

fac

tors

aff

ect

coop

erat

ion

and

bene

fit

shar

ing?

Rel

evan

t to

SD

BS

, C

BS

Ian

d be

nefi

t sh

arin

gIm

prov

e un

ders

tand

ing

of-

Wha

t ar

e th

e po

tent

ials

and

opp

ortu

niti

espr

ojec

ts,

and

to s

ome

ofav

aila

ble

Nil

e re

sour

ces,

-Im

prov

e po

vert

y m

appi

ng i

n th

e ba

sin,

in

part

icul

ar w

ater

-rel

ated

pov

erty

map

ping

EN

SA

P,

and

NE

LS

AP

pote

ntia

l de

velo

pmen

t an

d-

Wha

t le

vels

of

soci

oeco

nom

ic d

evel

opm

ent

coul

d be

ach

ieve

dpr

ojec

tsth

eir

impa

ct o

n-

Impr

ove

unde

rsta

ndin

g of

the

bas

in’s

opp

ortu

niti

es a

nd r

isks

, at

dif

fere

nt s

cale

sso

cioe

cono

mic

s of

the

(bas

in a

nd s

ubba

sin

leve

ls)

Nil

e pe

ople

-R

esea

rch

on p

olic

y-re

late

d is

sues

to

supp

ort

tran

sbou

ndar

y co

oper

atio

n, e

.g.,

val

uing

and

mon

itor

ing

tran

sbou

ndar

y be

nefi

ts/r

isks

6.

-Id

enti

fy p

rinc

iple

s an

d m

echa

nism

s fo

r be

nefi

t/ri

sk s

hari

ng,

revi

ew o

f su

cces

sful

tran

sbou

ndar

y m

anag

emen

t an

d ag

reem

ents

in

othe

r ri

ver

basi

ns-

How

to

effe

ctiv

ely

invo

lve

stak

ehol

ders

at

diff

eren

t le

vels

in

the

basi

n to

sup

port

opti

mal

coo

pera

tion

?

2.

Wha

t ar

e th

e be

nefi

ts o

btai

ned

thro

ugh

diff

eren

t us

es o

f w

ater

in

the

basi

n an

d w

hat

isth

eir

valu

e? W

hat

is t

he s

cope

(he

alth

, nu

trit

ion,

eco

nom

ic d

evel

opm

ent,

env

iron

men

tal

man

agem

ent)

?3

.W

ho a

re t

he b

enef

icia

ries

?4

.H

ow c

an t

hose

ben

efit

s be

sha

red

mor

e eq

uita

bly

and

mor

e ef

fici

entl

y?

Few

pot

enti

al t

opic

s th

at w

ere

high

ligh

ted

duri

ng t

he w

orks

hop

disc

ussi

on b

ut n

ot c

lass

ifie

d or

par

tial

ly c

lass

ifie

d in

the

abo

ve t

able

inc

lude

:1.

Inte

grat

ing

grou

ndw

ater

into

sur

face

wat

er m

anag

emen

t:a.

Und

erst

andi

ng g

roun

dwat

er p

oten

tial

, us

e, a

nd b

ehav

ior.

b.U

nder

stan

ding

wet

land

s-gr

ound

wat

er a

nd s

urfa

ce w

ater

int

erde

pend

enci

es.

2.W

ater

res

ourc

es:

a.H

ow d

o th

e w

ater

res

ourc

es v

ary

spat

iall

y an

d te

mpo

rall

y an

d ho

w s

houl

d th

ey b

e m

anag

ed t

o en

hanc

e ec

onom

ic d

evel

opm

ent

and

redu

ce i

n-eq

uiti

es s

usta

inab

ly?

b.R

esea

rch

to i

mpr

ove

unde

rsta

ndin

g of

riv

er m

orph

olog

y, a

nd r

eser

voir

sed

imen

tati

on.

c.W

hat

are

the

expe

rien

ces

of o

ther

bas

ins,

pos

sibl

e op

tion

s an

d m

odal

itie

s of

wat

er r

esou

rces

ins

titu

tion

s at

sub

basi

n (n

atio

nal)

and

bas

in(t

rans

-reg

iona

l) l

evel

s th

at c

an b

e ad

opte

d in

the

Nil

e B

asin

?d.

How

are

the

pol

icy

obje

ctiv

es u

pon

whi

ch t

he w

ater

res

ourc

es a

re p

lann

ed,

deve

lope

d, a

lloc

ated

and

uti

lize

d? W

hat

are

the

poli

cy c

onst

rain

tsan

d ho

w c

an t

hey

be a

llev

iate

d?e.

Wha

t ar

e th

e m

ost

appr

opri

ate

DS

S t

echn

ique

s as

app

lica

ble

to l

arge

bas

ins

like

the

Nil

e?

3.H

ealt

h im

pact

s of

wat

er r

esou

rces

dev

elop

men

t: W

hat

are

the

link

s be

twee

n w

ater

res

ourc

e de

velo

pmen

t/m

anag

emen

t an

d he

alth

im

pact

s?

22

Appendix 3. National Water-related Research Institutions

Country Training/Research Institutions Potential Areas of Specialization

Burundi 1. University of Burundi Water Resources Management and2. Institut Des Sciences Agronomiques du Engineering (could collaborate with

Burundi (ISABU) Rwanda), Agriculture

DRC 1. University of Kinshasa Water Quality Management, Environmental2. Centre Regional d’Etudes Nucleares de Management, Sanitary Engineering;

Kinshasa (CREN-K) Surface and Groundwater Hydrology, Soil3. University of Kisangani Conservation; Hydrobiology

Egypt 1. Regional Training Center, Ministry of Water Resources Management andWater Resources and Irrigation Engineering ; Hydraulics Engineering;(Host center for ATP) River Engineering

2. Cairo University3. Hydraulic Research Institute

Ethiopia 1. Arbaminch Water Technology Institute Water Resources Management and2. Addis Ababa University Engineering; Hydraulics, Hydrology,3. Alemya University Water Supply and Sanitation; Irrigation

and Drainage

Kenya 1. University of Nairobi Water Resources Management;2. Institute for Meteorological Training and Meteorology, Hydrology

Research3. Kenya Water Institute

Rwanda 1. National University of Rwanda: Water Resources Management andFaculty of Science Engineering; (Could collaborate with

2. Kigali Institute of Science, Technology and Burundi); Science and TechnologyManagement (KIST) programs; Agricultural Sector, Water and

3. Institute of Agronomic Sciences Soil Conservation

Sudan 1. Institute for Water and Irrigation Water Resources Management and2. University of Khartoum Engineering; Water Sector Assessment;3. The Hydraulic Research Station, Wad Medani Hydrology and Hydrogeology, Irrigation

and Drainage

Tanzania 1. University of Dar-es-Salaam Water Resources Management; Soil and2. Department of Research and Development Water Management; Hydrology; Natural3. Institute of Resources Assessment Resources Management.

Uganda 1. Makerere University: Department of Water Resources Management andCivil Engineering Engineering; Livestock and Fisheries

2. Agricultural Engineering and AppropriateTechnology Research

23

Appendix 4. Ongoing Research Projects Relevant to the NBI

The Nile has been selected by the CPWF as one of the benchmark basins for basin focal studies.A number of CPWF projects have been completed or ongoing in the Nile Basin on ‘Crop WaterProductivity’, ‘Watershed Management’, ‘Aquatic Ecosystem and Fisheries’, and ‘IntegratedRiver Basin Management’. A forthcoming project by CPWF is the ‘Nile Basin Focal Project’.

This Appendix gives additional information on the ongoing projects pertinent to the NBIconducted by different research organizations.

TABLE A 4.1 IWMI-NBEA ongoing projects.

No. Research Project Brief Description

NBI Synergy project Creating ‘Synergies’ and ‘Partnerships’ among the CGIAR, Nile Basin1. Initiative and ASARECA: Consultations to identify opportunities to

support NBI through research and capacity building

Dam Decision Support System The project aims to investigate which DSS are most appropriate for2. the complexity of large dam operation to ensure successful stakeholder

participation

APPIA To improve the capacities of farmers and field level staff in enhancing3. Improving Performance of performance of small- and medium-scale irrigation schemes

Irrigated Agriculture in (French-supported)sub-Saharan Africa

MUS The focus of Multiple Use Systems (MUS) is on developing tested4. Multiple Use Systems tools and guidelines for multiple-use water services delivery as an

effective way to use water for poverty alleviation and gender equityhttp://www.musproject.net

Blue Nile: Upstream To identify major water, land and livestock management constraints,5. Downstream project opportunities, impacts of interventions within the Blue Nile catchment

and downstream

IIPE Research and capacity building project applying new methodologies6. Impact of Irrigation on Poverty for assessing the impacts of irrigation on poverty and environment

and Environment and finding ways to enhance the positive impacts (Austria-supported)

IPMS ILRI led project, IWMI contribution is in relation to small-scale irrigation,7. Improving Productivity and water harvesting and development of training module (CIDA-funded)

Market System for SmallholderFarmers in Ethiopia

RIPARWIN The project studies competition for water in the upper part of the8. Raising Irrigation Productivity Great Ruaha River (Tanzania)

and Releasing Water forIntersectoral Needs

9. POADIUM Application of the POADIUM decision tool for assessing water andfood tradeoffs in Ethiopia and at the river basin level

10. Agricultural Water Management Small-scale irrigation technologies inventory, impact assessment andTechnologies dissemination of best practices

11. Improving Water Productivity The project aims to optimize productive use of water to increaseof Crop-Livestock Systems of incomes and improve the environment, within crop-livestock systemssub-Saharan Africa in the semi-arid areas of southern Africa (Zimbabwe) and the Blue

Nile Basin (Ethiopia). http://www.vslp.org

24

TABLE A 4.2 ILRI ongoing projects.

No . Research Programs Brief Descriptionand Projects

1. Nile Basin The project aims to improve food security and reduce poverty through policiesLivestock Water that promote equitable, productive and sustainable use of water, land andProductivity livestock (funded by the CPWF)

Livestock Systems The objective is to improve understanding of how livestock systems evolve inEvolution order to anticipate where, when, and how to make livestock-related policy and

technological interventions to alleviate poverty, sustain rural livelihoods andprotect the environmenthttp://www.ilri.org/research/Content.asp?CCID=44&SID=7

Targeting Pro-poor The objective is to improve understanding of trends and alternative features ofInterventions livestock sector development used to set priorities and influence resource

allocation decisions. http://www.ilri.org/research/Content.asp?CCID=44&SID=7

Poverty, Sustainable To enhance the livelihoods of livestock-keepers through improved understandingLivelihoods, and of the poverty process and livelihood strategies and role of livestock, strengthenedLivestock research-policy linkages, information sharing, and dissemination of knowledge

http://www.ilri.org/research/Content.asp?CCID=44&SID=7

TABLE A 4.3 IFPRI ongoing programs.

No. Research Project Brief Description

1. Food System Functioning - Global food scenarios- Managing natural resources- Food systems: disaster prevention, relief, and rebuilding after crises

2. Food System Governance - Food and water safety- Enhanced food and diet quality- Sustainable poverty reduction and nutrition improvement- Country and regional food, nutrition, and agricultural strategies

3. Food System Innovations - Pro-poor science and technology policies- The future of smallholder farming

- Capacity strengthening for policy and research

TABLE A 4.4 WorldFish Center ongoing programs.

No. Research Project Brief Description

1. Manage implications of The project activities will be centered on the fisheries of Lake Tanaexpanding markets and trade (Ethiopia), Lake Nasser (Egypt) and Lake Volta (Ghana) where research

will assess current markets and marketing systems as well as the potentialfor increased market integrationwww.worldfishcenter.org/cms/list_article.aspx?catID=38&ddlID=63

2. International Network on The prospects for genetic improvement of tropical finfish, as demonstratedGenetics in Aquaculture by the Genetic Improvement of Farmed Tilapia (GIFT) Project

www.worldfishcenter.org/inga/index.htm

25

TABLE A 4.5 Some of ASARECA-SWMnet ongoing projects.

No. Research Project Brief Description

1. Managing nutrients and water Issues addressed: Commercialization and enterprise orientationtogether in response to markets of smallholder agriculture; soil-fertility recapitalization.

2. Promoting natural resources management Issues include: Product-chains, investment and partnershipthrough effective governance and arrangements that effectively link integrated natural resourcefarmer-market linkages management interventions to markets

3. Efficient use of crop residues: animal Issues addressed include: Nutrient recycling from crop residues;feed versus conservation agriculture Direct incorporation into the soil; Crop residues fed to animals

4. Improved management of agricultural Issues addressed: Improved policy and strategic framework forWater in eastern and southern Africa AWM in the ESA Region(IMAWESA)

5. Spatial mapping, forecasting and - Making the best of climate: adapting agriculture topredicting climate variability trends climate variabilityand associated risks to agricultural - Managing uncertainty: innovation systems for copingproductivity and profitability with climate variability and change

6. Investments necessary for successful - SWMnet Project 8: Proof-of-Concept that the IAR4Dintegrated management of watersheds approach improves delivery and impact of agricultural

research

- task force: Integrated Watershed Management (IWM)

TABLE A 4.6 FAONile ongoing projects.

No. Research Project Brief Description

1. Agricultural Water The project intends to produce: Agricultural production database for a baselineProductivity Case Study year (2000); Analysis of the current agricultural water productivity under

rain-fed and irrigated conditions

2. Basin Wide Survey of The project intends to produce: A baseline survey (for the year 2000)Agricultural Water Use of agricultural water use, includes maps of population, land use, cropping

patterns in irrigation, water use in rain-fed and irrigated agriculture, and anassessment of current water development facilities, together with estimates ofwater use in other sectors

3. Consolidation of the The project intends to produce: Consolidated Nile-DST; updating andNile Decision Support documenting some components of the Nile-DSTTool Nile–DST

4. Development of The project intends to produce: Development of a metadata catalogue listingGeo-referenced web-based data sources for water resources in the Nile BasinNile Basin Database

5. Development of GIS The project intends to produce: Set of specific GIS products integratingInformation Products physical and socioeconomic data. Expanded database, in particular of

basin-wide data layers

6. Development of The project intends to produce: Identification and analysis of the majorScenarios of Demand drivers of future demand of agricultural produce in the Nile Basinfor Agricultural Producein the Nile Basin

7. Legal and Institutional The project intends to produce: Strengthened skills of decision makers inComponent interest-based negotiations; Enhanced understanding of how customary law

could support formal law in local dispute resolution

8. Transboundary The project intends to produce: Limited extension of hydrometric monitoringHydro-meteorological network of a transboundary nature. Establishment and operation of an InternetMonitoring Network forum supporting hydro- meteorological network

26

TABLE A 4.7 IAEA ongoing projects.

No. Research Project Brief Description

1. Improving water This project aimed at addressing the importance and interaction of groundwaterbalances for: and surface water in Nile BasinLake VictoriaBlue Nile BasinHigh Aswan Dam

2. Mainstreaming The objective is to enhance national and regional capacity to add agroundwater ‘groundwater dimension’ to joint management of the Nile Basin. The use ofConsiderations into the isotope hydrology is central to the generation of the necessary data requiredIntegrated Management to understand the role of groundwater in the shared Nile water resourcesof the Nile River Basin

ISBN: 978-92-9090-689-6

SM

IWMI is a Future Harvest Centersupported by the CGIAR

Postal AddressP O Box 2075ColomboSri Lanka

Location127, Sunil MawathaPelawattaBattaramullaSri Lanka

Telephone+94-11 2880000

Fax+94-11 2786854

[email protected]

Websitehttp://www.iwmi.org

I n t e r n a t i o n a lWater ManagementI n s t i t u t e