working package 6 project partners meeting no. 8 · working package 6 project partners meeting no....

Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund)

Working package 6 Project partners meeting No. 8

2013-06-13 BERLIN

Presentation by Mr. Albertas Arūna


CRITERIA OF THE RAIL BALTICA INTERMODAL TERMINAL/FREIGHT VILLAGE

2

Lithuania (Albertas Arūna)


3

RAIL BALTICA GROWTH CORRIDOR (RBGC)

WP-6 PILOT LOGISTICS

WAY OF THINKING FOR CARRYING OUT RESEARCH

1) the largest part of costs in the process of logistics is associated with transportation logistics;

2) freight transportation consists of the following stages: collection from shippers (last miles), terminal activity, line

transportation, network process management;

3) in all these stages, the owner of property and operator acting on the basis of contracts with the owner must be

assigned;

4) the owner of infrastructure in international trade logistics in the countries of Eastern Europe is usually a state

institution, the shares of which belong to the state, or other entities (subsidiary companies) established by them or

with capital of private sector entities of other countries;

5) Freight corridor is formed by the principal route including equipment installed, transloading terminals, sideways,

shunting yards, marshalling yards, bypasses and sections nearby significant destinations;

6) in case of RBGC, principal route belongs to EU TEN-T core network, and it is the object of state planning and EU

financing;

7) meanwhile, additional components to the principal route – intermodal and container terminals, access railways,

siding yards, train formation activity, warehouses, access roads or streets are mainly the objects of regional or local

territorial planning and permissions for construction, implementation of which is associated with possession of land

using right and transfer of financial contribution to the development of local infrastructure. Therefore, the influence

of local level authorities is very significant;

8) the access of goods from the principal route to a warehouse or the place of retail trade is also very significant for

the local people communities and is in the centre of attention due to external, mostly negative influence on the

quality of life;


9) intermodal terminals are the main element with respect to accessibility of intermodal services, and this ensures

economic and competitive with road transport logistic chain on a European scale;

10) the main stakeholders between the Shipper and Client in intermodal freight transportation are: terminal or

intermodal operators, railway services providers, clients or their forwarders and line infrastructure managers;

11) a part of RBGC principal route is included in EU regulated Freight railway corridor No. 8, and in 2013 it is planned

to carry out a corridor transport study as the main document for management of the corridor (Kaunas –

Rotterdam). Such study will mainly deal with improvement of the principal route and distribution of capacities

among transport operators;

12) It is stated in EC Regulation for freight railway corridor that Management Board has to form separate Working

Groups for considering problems of additional corridor components, to be specific, intermodal terminals;

13) In the description of RBGC, specific definition of PILOT LOGISTICS is not provided. This will be a result of WP 4.4

activity and will be presented as WP 6 action plan. This can be interpreted as a starting point for creation of

freight transport supporting working group, which would become a constituent part of corridor management

process as representative of Rail Baltica in freight corridor No. 8.

14) Having analyzed the definitions found in theoretical material and other studies, a conclusion can be made:

IN PILOT LOGISTICS PROCESS THE STATE OF INTERMODAL TERMINALS, THEIR INTERRELATIONS, THE PROCESS

OF LAST MILE SHOULD BE ANALYZED, WITH RESPECT TO PRESENT AND NEAREST-FUTURE TECHNICAL

LEVEL OF LINE INFRASTRUCTURE.

In this case, the main stakeholders would be: operators of intermodal (container) terminals, railway transport

operators and intermodal operators (operators of international logistics), attracting also groups of local

forwarders.

15) PILOT LOGISTICS group should be formed of logistics components groups of Ludwigsfelde, Poznan, Lodz,

Warsaw, Kaunas transport region, Riga, Tallinn, Southern Finland, consisting of the Leading and ordinary

terminals. Such propositions would be presented as draft conclusion of WP 4.4.

4


PL CT Terminal Operator

Location

connection with the road

infrastructure

paneuropean corridors

main directions scope of services

1 1 DUUS (DB

international) Güd Großbeeren

GVZ Berlin

L40 (Posdam), L-76 (Berlin), B-101, Railway sidings

II, North-South axis 1

12 Terminals in Germany

Containers, swap-bodies semitrailers,

dangerous goods area, free access

2

2

CARGOSPED Sp. z o.o. (100 Cargo

PKP) Poznan (Gadki)

3 CARGOSPED Sp. Z

o.o

Kobylwieca Dworcowa 3

All type of containers, swap

bodies semi-trailers, refrig. cargo

4

POLZUG INTERMODAL

POLSKA Sp. z o.o

Magazynawa 8, Gadki

A2, S11 Large cont., swap

bodies, semi-trailers

5

Centrum Logistyczno

Investycyjne Poznan (CHP)

Swarzedz - Jasin Robowiecka str.

Large cont., swap

bodies, semi-trailers

3

6 SPEDCONT Spedycja

Polska Sp. z o.o. Lodz Olechov All types of ITU

PCC Infermodal Kutno road 92, railroad

CE20/E20

Terminal Piotrków

Trybunalski -

operator en

Logistics (planned)

1500E, 1540E No operator

List of PL and terminals on RB

principal route



Location

connection with the road infrastructure



4

7 CARGOSPED Sp. z

o.o. Warszawa Praga DK8 I, II, VI

Hamburg, Gdynia, Gdańsk, Szczecin, Niemcy- Horka,

Frankfurt nad O., Chechy- Chałupki,

Zebrzydowice, Litwa- Trakiszki, Słowacja- Zwadroń, Muszyna

8

SPEDCONT Spedycja Polska

Sp. z o.o. Warszawa S8, DK61 I, II, VI

Transhipment of containers, swap bodies and semi-

trailers

9

POLZUG INTERMODAL

POLSKA Sp. z o.o

Pruszków I, II, VI

Rotterdam, Bremenhaven,

Hamburg, Poznań, Gdańsk

Transhipment: Containers (20 '- 40' /

40 'HC / 45' / TC), swap bodies, semi-

trailer

10

POLZUG INTERMODAL

POLSKA Sp. z o.o

Brwinów (at the PKP railway line Warszawa - Łódź, (2,5 km on south-

west of the existing terminal in Pruszkow).

PLANNED INFRASTRUCTURE



Location

connection with the road infrastructure



5 10 JSC "Lithuanian

railways" Šeštokai E-85, R-B I Poland, Latvia All types

6 11 Kaunas E-274, E-85, E-77 I, IX, RB

Latvia, Poland, Belorusia, Kaliningrad

(RF)

All type of conteiners. 2 km -

FEZ 240 ha

7 12 JSC "Lithuanian

railways" Vilnius I

Poland, Latvia, Belorusia, Klaipėda

All type of conteiners

transloading rail/rail, rail/road

8 13 Šiauliai E-272, E-77 IA, I, IX B, IA

Latvia, Poland, Belorusia, Klaipėda,

Kaliningrad

Int. Airport - 2 km. All type of ITU,

Klaipėda part-160 km.

10 14 Riga conteiner

terminal Ryga, Latvia E-85, A-2 I

Lithuania, Russia, Kaliningrad, N.Europa

All type of containers

11 15 Muuga Container

terminal Port of Tallinn

Muuga Harbour

Via-Baltica, Tallinn-Narva, S-Petersburg, R-

Baltica

I Finnland, S.Petersburg, Poland, Germany parts,

Latvia

Conteiners ro-ro cargo

11 16 Port of Helsinki Voosaari I Stockholm, Tallinn,

Travemiunde, Rostock, Gdynia, S.Peterburg

Container ro-ro traffic


Preliminary allocation of Pilot Logistics on R-B route

8


Preliminary proposal for new logistics service product

9


List of participants in survey Contact details [Company / organization name:] Contact details [Contact person name, surname,

position:] Contact details [Address:] Contact details

[Postcode:]

LDz Cargo Logistika Maris Kancans,member of the board Dzirnavu iela 147/2,Riga,Latvia LV1050

DB Schenker Latvia Kristine Pojasnikova, Director RLF 11c Katlakalna street 1073

UAB "Mockavos terminalas" Ernestas Vaitkevicius, director Vykinto 14, Vilnius LT-08117

Port of Helsinki / Vuosaari Harbour Ari Parviainen, Development Manager P.O. Box 800 FI-00099 HELSINKI

Kouvola Innovation Oy Simo Paivinen Project manager Paraatikentta 4 45100

JSC Lithuanian Railways - Vilnius Konstantinas Rusakovas, senior Manager of Logistics Projects Division

Mindaugo st. 12 LT-03603

JSC "Lithuanian Railways" - Kaunas Konstantinas Rusakovas, senior Manager of Logistics Projects Division

Mindaugo st. 12 LT-03603

JSC "Lithanian Railways" - Klaipėda Konstantinas Rsakovas, Senior manger of Logistics project division

Mindaugo sr. 12 LT- 03603

EVR Cargo Ltd Janek Ojamäe, Commercial Director Toompuiestee 35, Tallinn 15073

Port of Tallinn Erik Ringmaa, Chief Commercial Officer 25, Sadama Street, Tallinn 15051

Transiidikeskuse AS Erik Laidvee Rävala 3/Kuke 2 10143

Riigiressursside Keskus OÜ Tiit Karu, Chairman of the Board Rävala 8, Tallinn 10143

SPEDCONT Spedycja Polska Spółka z o.o. Artur Krzelowski - Commercial Director ul. Limanowskiego 121 91-334 ŁÓDŹ

SPEDCONT Spółka z o.o. Artur Krzelowski - Commercial Director Warszawa, ul. Ordona 2a 01-237

AS Eesti Raudtee Ahti Asmann, CEO Toompuiestee 35, Tallinn 15073

IPG Infrastruktur und Projektentwicklungsgesellschaft mbH

Martin Heiland, Head of Transport Devision of IPG

Burgstrasse 30, Postdam

10


Results of intermodal terminals survey

11


Results of intermodal terminals survey (1)

– Responses are received from all project partner countries.

– The terminals are located mainly in urban areas.

– The operators of terminals are daughter companies of independent bodies, mainly affiliated with railway companies.

– The governments are owners of equity of main part of terminals.

– The road component of transportation distance from terminal various from 2 km to 400 km. Average travel distance various from 15 km to 123 km.

– The distance to the access point of public railway infrastructure network is 2–5 km. The conditions for such a positive case are the administrative relations between terminal operator and main railway company in the country.

– The majority of terminals are working in horizontal type of international logistics channel. Only one, port of Tallinn, is working in vertical type of international logistics channel.


– Development of activities is foreseen in all terminals. Main directions of development are:

• extension of transshipment area;

• construction of additional storage area;

• introducing of new service for clients;

• construction of warehouses.

– The development plans are in preparation phase. The 37 % of responders mentioned about the approved plans.

– The 75 % terminals are working with a range of licensed railway companies. 25 % declared that they are working with 1 railway company.

– Only 30 % of responders are operating in logistics service delivery system just-in-time. Other responders are operating in simple (as usual) type of logistics service delivery system.

13



– Main receivers of containerized freight are:

• wholesalers;

• single logistics centers;

• forwarding companies acting for transit.

– All responders have specific areas for storage of loaded containers with ADR goods.

– The main type of access roads is urban streets and municipal roads. 50% of responders declared about national roads and highways.

– The rate of average annual utilization of terminals space is 60 %.

– In principal all terminals are open for cargo from all shippers.

– 95 % of responders declared that the aim of RGBC project is well known.

14



– Only 60 % declared the willingness to participate actively in the cooperation initiative along Rail Baltic project.

– Interest of forwarding companies, interoperability of intermodal terminals, level of cooperation among main actors of transport process are the main factors for increasing share of freight transport in Railway sector.

– The forms of cooperation are listed in a such order:

• memorandum of understanding;

• agreement of cooperation;

• permanent thematic working group;

• association of partners.

Small priority is expressed for memorandum of understanding.

– 50 % of operators of the terminals are involved in the process of implementation of green transport concept.

15



Interoperability requirements:

• The principle of non-discriminative access to terminals;

• Rail side access for all licensed railways undertakings;

• Roads side access for all transport operators;

• Transparent capacity allocation and pricing;

• Bundling of different cargoes and market segments;

• Improved capacity utilization, which consists of:

• increase of flow factor;

• control of shunting services;

• extent in of terminal opening time;

• bonus-malus incentives for the use of interim storage space;

• IT-based capacity management systems;

• automated loading unit identification;

• separation of rail-side and road side handlings;

• tasks management according to pre-notification.

16


The proposed interoperability threshold (1)

1. Nodal point:

• 1.1. Road access for trucks with load of 11 tn/axle;

• 1.2. Check in/check out area with sufficient parking area;

• 1.3. Three or five ‘’train long’’ handling or transshipment tracks;

• 1.4. Rail mounted gantry cranes (RMG);

• 1.5. Two or three interim storage or buffer lanes;

• 1.6. One loading and one driving lane;

• 1.7. Double sided rail access with direct entry and departure of the train by the main line traction unit;

• 1.8. Multipurpose activity (SWAP bodies,semitrailers, containers, refrigerators, ADR goods).

17


The proposed interoperability threshold (2)

2. Corridor network:

• 2.1. Quality management system (ISO 9001) introdused;

• 2.2. Environmental management system (ISO 14001) introdused;

• 2.3. Security management system (ISO 28000) introdused;

• 2.4. Interchange time gate in/out truck - 30min;

• 2.5. Availability for at least many actors in the transportation system;

• 2.6. Competitve neutrality;

• 2.7. Openness for all clients.

18


Thank you for your attention!

19

working package 6 project partners meeting no. 8 · working package 6 project partners meeting no....

Documents