wind energy feasibility taylor r. edwards. scenario client seeking risk analysis and turbine...
TRANSCRIPT
Scenario
Client seeking risk analysis and turbine recommendation
Coastal residential property
Humboldt County, CA
PG&E
http://edcallaert.photoshelter.com/image/I0000XV7mSClolgw
Procedure
Wind speed data
Energy productio
n
AnnualRevenue
Feasibility
calculations
Engineering
Economics
Wind Turbines Tested
Turbine make and model Power Rating (kW)
Bergey XL-1 1
Jacobs J31-20 20
Vestas V29/225 225
Micon NM44 750
General Electric 1.5S 1,500
Probability of Present Value
Turbines are compared using respective present values that are estimated to have 95% probability of being met or exceeded The 5th percentile present value
Probability of negative present value
Probability Calculations
Random sampling
5th percentile present value
Probability of negative present value, loss on investment
Results
Turbine 5th Percentile Present Value
Probability of Negative Present Value
Bergey XL-1 $62 0.0405
Jacobs J31-20 ($5372) 0.1506
Vestas V29/225 $111,298 0.0088
Micon NM44 ($123,450) 0.1047
General Electric 1.5S $848,336 0.0104
General Electric 1.5S
1,500 kW turbine is most suitable
http://www.ge-energy.com/products_and_services/products/wind_turbines/ge_1.5_77_wind_turbine.jsp
Energy to Money
http://sfbayview.com/2011/pge-disregards-precautionary-principle-with-smart-meters/
http://reich-chemistry.wikispaces.com/Mann.+McLaughlin
Results
Wind turbine Payback time (yrs) Net gain on investment(1x106)
GE 1.5S 9.6 $3.17
Micon NM82 8.8 $3.69
Nordex S70 9.9 $2.98
Results
Wind turbine Return on Investment Rate of Return
GE 1.5S 75.8% 10.3%
Micon NM82 86% 11.2%
Nordex S70 71.7% 10.0%
Results
Wind turbine Annual earning, 90% probability exceedance (1x103)
GE 1.5S $316
Micon NM82 $342
Nordex S70 $307
Results
Wind turbine Payback time (years)
Net gain on investment (1x103)
Bergey XL-1 11.6 $2.5
Jacobs J31-20 13.9 $23
Vestas V29/225 9.8 $456
Micon NM44 13.5 $798
GE 1.5S 9.6 $3,183