wildlife risk mitigation project update

18
Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project Update Dr. Richard W. Smith Assistant State Veterinarian over Ruminant Programs Bovine TB Program Coordinator

Upload: parry

Post on 22-Mar-2016

39 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project Update. Dr. Richard W. Smith Assistant State Veterinarian over Ruminant Programs Bovine TB Program Coordinator. Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project Goal. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project Update

Wildlife Risk Mitigation ProjectUpdate

Dr. Richard W. SmithAssistant State Veterinarian over Ruminant

ProgramsBovine TB Program Coordinator

Page 2: Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project Update

Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project Goal

• To work with approximately 1,000 farms in Michigan’s TB zones to develop individual biosecurity plans for each farm.

• Why do farms in the TB zones need a biosecurity plan?

Page 3: Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project Update
Page 4: Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project Update
Page 5: Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project Update

Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project’s Objectives

• Protect stored feed from wildlife intrusions

• Provide water that has not been contaminated by wildlife intrusions

• Feed cattle safelyWhere cattle pasture How & where fed feeds are fed to

cattle

Page 6: Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project Update

Results• Project began in August 2008• 2009-340 participating farms-340 farms verified• 2010-349 participating farms-348 farms verified• 2011-186 participating farms-186 farms verified• 2012-83 participating farms-80 farms verified• 2013-69 participating farms-48 farms verified• Totals: 1,027 farms participated 1,002 farms verified (98%)

Page 7: Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project Update

How Many Farms Are Still Unmitigated?

MAAZ• Antrim - 18/118 15% 1 herd with 20+ cattle• Charlevoix - 14/98 14% 0 herds with 20+• Cheboygan - 39/134 29% 0 herds with 20+• Crawford - 100% mitigated• Emmet - 18/131 14% 0 herds with 20+• Otsego - 11/70 16% 0 herds with 20+• Presque Isle – 34/125 27% 4 herds with 20+

Page 8: Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project Update

How Many Farms Are Still Unmitigated?

MAZ• Alcona - 28/89 31% 3 herds with

20+ cattle• Alpena - 54/219 25% 9 herds with

20+• Montmorency - 15/88 17% 2 herds

with 20+• Oscoda - 27/69 39% 2 herds with

20+

Page 9: Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project Update

Has WRM Helped Prevent TB Infections?

• Program benchmark: 2 winter inspections

Since 2009 • Three bovine TB infected farms that

had been winter verified twiceoAll of these farms were located in DMU

452oTwo of these farms were previously

infected

Page 10: Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project Update

Has WRM Helped Prevent TB Infections?

• Two farms that had entered the program for a short while (one a few months, the other a few days), but were found infected prior to ever being winter inspected even once

• Since 2009 there have been five bovine TB infected farms associated with wildlife intrusions that were not verified as Wildlife Risk Mitigated

Page 11: Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project Update

Conclusion From Results• Farms in core area (DMU 452) may

require additional attention to details of farms’ biosecurity plan.

• Because of increased risk of TB infected WTD grazing pastures in core area there is likely a increased risk to cattle.o Research has demonstrated it takes 20-30 hours

of sunlight to kill the bacteria (M. bovis) deposited on grass in infected saliva.

Page 12: Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project Update

WRM Project’s ResponseAs a result of finding two farms in 2012 the WRM Project field staff reached out in 2012-2013 to producers in DMU 452 to:• provide info on where TB has occurred within

5 mile radius of their farm• look for any chinks in farm’s plano Emily Sewell-Alpena Conservation District Office o Wildlife Services field staff-Gaylord WS Office

• About 50% of farms in DMU 452 requested a biologist to visit their farm.

Page 13: Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project Update

WRM Project’s ResponseAsked MSU for assistance in researching:

• the safety of wet wrapping hay - Dr. Grooms will present the findings this afternoon at 1:30

• the safety in presenting salt in areas where it can be accessed by wildlife - I will present the findings this afternoon at 1:50

Page 14: Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project Update

WRM Project’s Response• 2013 survey of producers in DMU

452 regarding:oHow they viewed the possibility of a

State sponsored herd buyout program similar to what Texas did in the El Paso watershed 25% favorable (13/51)

oHow they viewed a State sponsored cost-share program to fence pastures 57% favorable (36/63)

Page 15: Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project Update

Benefits of WRM Project

• Practical - keeping cattle from being infected by bovine TBo39% (20/51) of infected farms in TB

zone no longer have cattle

Page 16: Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project Update

Benefits of WRM ProjectMAAZ

• Has helped TB Program to move MAAZ counties to higher status

• If mitigated no need to do pre-movement testIf not mitigated must do pre-movement test

at own expense• If mitigated no need for cattle to have

post-movement testIf not mitigated purchaser must do post-

movement test

Page 17: Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project Update

Benefits of WRM ProjectMAZ

• Cost-share program (2009-2013)o $1,136,952.97 provided in

MDARD funded cost-share grants

o 74 cost shared hoop barnso 4 cost-shared feed storage

fences• MDARD sought out Federal

funding (2011)o $1,500,000 provided

through NRCS’ EQIP Program

Page 18: Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project Update

Questions?