what’s driving biofuels growth? promoting what are biofuels? · climate change facts and trends...
TRANSCRIPT
Whatrsquos driving biofuels growthBiofuels have existed for over a hundred years ndash Henry Ford designed his Model T to run on bioethanol ndash but they have mostly been unable to compete with fuels derived from crude oil New government energy policies subsidies and tax exemptions are now stimulating biofuels production which has doubled since 1998 and is predicted to double again by 20115 There are a number of reasons why governments favour biofuels
Combating climate change
Transport is a signifcant contributor to
climate change accounting for around
25 of man-made greenhouse gas
emissions globally
In principle the use of biofuels can help
reduce transportrsquos impact on climate
change This is because the plants used
to make the fuels absorb carbon dioxide
(CO2) ndash the most important greenhouse
gas ndash as they grow The gas is later
released when the biofuels are used
However biofuels are not carbon neutral
It takes energy to grow and harvest the
plants and to process and distribute
biofuels The entire process emits CO2
and fertilisers emit nitrous oxide (N2O) a
powerful greenhouse gas (see graphic 4)
The amount of energy needed to make
different biofuels varies considerably This
makes it vital to take the entire production
process into account when assessing
the potential of biofuels to help reduce
transport CO2 emissions Read more about
CO2 performance overleaf
Technology and innovation
Unlike other renewable fuels such
as hydrogen the infrastructure to
manufacture and distribute biofuels is in
place today Biofuels are also compatible
with todayrsquos vehicles and power
generation technology
In 2006 $26 billion6 was invested in
biofuels The International Energy Agency
(IEA)7 estimates that between 2005 and
2030 it will cost $160 billion to expand
biofuel production to fuel 4 of global
road transport and $225 billion to fuel 7
Energy security
Global energy demands are increasing
rapidly The worldrsquos population has
doubled in the last four decades ndash to
around 66 billion in 2004 ndash and is
expected to exceed 9 billion8 by 2050
Rapid development particularly in China
and India is increasing wealth and this is
boosting demands for energy and transport
There were around 900 million vehicles
on the road in 2000 but this is forecast to
increase to over 2 billion by 20509
Fossil fuels (oil coal and gas) are
expected to be the dominant source of
energy for the foreseeable future But
production has already peaked in many
major oil-producing countries and new
developments are increasingly located in
environmentally challenging and politically
unstable parts of the world This has
resulted in high oil prices which the IEA
predicts will remain between $48ndash$62
until 203010 Some analysts predict 2030
prices could be as high as $10011 High oil
prices hit developing countries the hardest
ndash some spend six times as much on fuel as
on health12
Biofuels are seen by governments as a
secure source of energy and a way to
reduce reliance on imported fossil fuels
Brazil has replaced around 1513 of its
petrol consumption with bioethanol
according to the IEA The Washington Post puts this fgure at 4014
Rural development
Biofuels can help boost farm incomes
Globalisation and the industrialisation of
farming have reduced the price farmers
get for their produce Demand for the
agricultural commodities used to make
biofuels is reversing this trend In the
developed world this is creating jobs
and reducing the need for subsidies
for farmers
[4] biofuel co2 lifecYcle iMPAcTS
CO2
Fertilising
Harvesting Transporting
Processing
Transporting
Use
Growing
CO2
CO2 CO2
CO2
CO2
CO2
Energy
EnergyEnergy
EnergyEnergy
Energy
N2O
[2] fiRST-GeNeRATioN biofuelS bioDieSel Production process
Soybean oil
Diesel mix
Palm oil Rapeseed oil
Methyl esters
Transesterifcation
[1] fiRST-GeNeRATioN biofuelS bioeThANol Production process
Sugarcane
Sugar
Petrol mix
Corn
Starch
bioethanol
fermentation
biomass to liquid production process
Petrol mixDiesel mix
celluose ethanol production process
[3] SecoND-GeNeRATioN biofuelS
biochemical treatment
enzymatic hydrolysis
Sugar
fermentation
cellulose ethanol
Thermochemical treatmentgasifcation
Synthesis gas
Synthesis
hydrocarbons
Biomass including agricultural
residues
Special crops such as fast growing woody plants
Changes in government energy policies
are accelerating demand for liquid or
gaseous biofuels used in transport (see
facing page)
Transport biofuels can be distributed using
existing technology and used in todayrsquos
vehicles without modifcation when mixed
with petrol or diesel or in adapted vehicles
if used neat or in high concentrations
There are many different biofuels made
using a variety of production processes
and feedstocks There are two categories
First-generation biofuels made from
food crops These are widely used today
Second-generation biofuels made from
non-food crops These are in development
and will not be widely commercially
available for at least fve to ten years
First-generation biofuels
First-generation biofuels are made from
food crops including wheat rapeseed
corn soya and sugarcane
There are two main types of frst-generation
biofuels now in commercial use
Bioethanol Bioethanol is made by fermenting sugars
produced by plants (similar to beer and
wine production) Bioethanol accounts for
around 851 of global biofuel production
and is mainly produced from corn and
sugarcane
Bioethanol is usually blended with petrol ndash
todayrsquos fuel standards allow bioethanol to
be mixed with petrol in volumes up to 5
in Europe and 10 in the USA Bioethanol
can be used at higher concentrations
or neat For example in Brazil all petrol
contains at least 20ndash25 bioethanol and
many vehicles have been adapted to run
on 100 bioethanol
Bioethanol has a lower energy density
than petrol This makes it about 402 less
fuel effcient
What are biofuelsBiofuels are made by processing food crops and other plants animal products or wastes (collectively known as biomass) These can be burnt to generate electricity or heat and are increasingly being used as transport fuels
Sources of information1 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
2 International Energy Agency httpieaorgtextbasework2004eswg21_NCVpdf
3 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
4 httpwwwbiodieselorgresourcesfuelfactsheetsstandards_and_warrantiesshtm
5 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
6 United Nations Environment Programme Global Trends in Sustainable Energy Investment 2007
7 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
8 United Nations World Population to 2300 2004
9 World Business Council for Sustainable Development Energy amp Climate Change Facts and Trends to 2050 2004
10 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
11 Energy Information Administration Annual Energy Outlook 2007
12 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
13 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
14 Washington Post 200807
15 International Energy Agency Biofuels for Transport ndash An International Perspective 2004
16 Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ 2006
17 Delft Hydraulics
18 Based on Food and Agriculture Organization data available at wwwwaterfootprintorg
19 United Nations World Population to 2300 2004
20 Economist 23607
21 International Monetary Fund World Economic Report April 2007
22 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and DevelopmentFood and Agriculture Organization Agricultural Outlook 2007-2016
23 Food and Agriculture Organization State of Food Insecurity in the World 2006
24 International Energy Agency Biofuels For Transport An International Perspective 2004
25 Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ (2006) and Delft Hydraulics
Rainforest Deforestation Impacts [7] graphic
Journal of Cleaner Production 2006 Palm Oil and the Emission of Carbon-Based Greenhouse Gases Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ
Journal of Tropical Forest Science 2005 An Assessment of Changes in Biomass Carbon Stocks in Tree Crops and Forests in Malaysia Henson IE
Oil World Annual 2007 ISTA Mielke GmbH
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Volume 2 Energy 2006
Unilever NVWeena 455 PO Box 7603000 DK RotterdamThe NetherlandsT +31 (0)10 217 4000F +31 (0)10 217 4798
Commercial Register RotterdamNumber 24051830
Unilever PLCPO Box 68100 Victoria Embankment London EC4P 4BQ United KingdomT +44 (0)20 7822 5252F +44 (0)20 7822 5951
Unilever PLC registered offceUnilever PLCPort SunlightWirralMerseyside CH62 4ZDUnited Kingdom
Registered in England and WalesCompany Number 41424
wwwunilevercom
Writing and consultancy Context
Design and production Red Letter Design
Illustrations (Graphics 4 and 7) KJA-artistscom
Printing Scanplus (on paper made from responsibly managed forests)
Biodiesel Biodiesel is a blend of methyl esters (a type
of biofuel) and diesel Methyl esters are
produced by a chemical reaction between a
vegetable oil and an alcohol They are made
from rapeseed (primarily) palm oil and
soybean oil and account for around 153
of global biofuel production
Biodiesel is the most commonly used
biofuel in Europe where fuel standards
allow 5 blends USA fuel standards allow
blends of up to 204 Specially designed
vehicles can run on 100 biodiesel
Second-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels are made from
non-food feedstocks such as wood and
straw The production process uses the
whole plant rather than just the plant
starches or sugars that are used to make
frst-generation biofuels This means waste
materials from agricultural and forestry can
be used as feedstocks
There are a number of second-generation
biofuels under development These include
cellulose ethanol which is produced from
straw using enzymes and can be mixed
with petrol biomass-to-liquid fuel which
is made from wood feedstocks and can be
blended with diesel and biomethane a
gas made from organic material (such as
manure and straw) which can be used in
modifed petrol and diesel engines
ral
defo
rest
atio
nde
velo
pmen
t en
ergy
se
food
s
l
hor
and
t
-
ages l
curit
use
y C
a
and
O
c
2
h
sa
t
ava
er sh
ora
hig
h fo
od p
rices
foo
dag
tng
vin
e
gs
i
s
la
biod
e
s
b
hig
u tai
v
l
s
i
e
i
si
r
t
sitho
y
hy
n
loss
a
t
r
r
f
b
t
a
ao
l
geo
i i
sd
y
t
ls
an
d av
aila
bilit
y den
ergy
sec
urity
CO
2 sa
v ng
s s
usta
inab
ility
stan
dard
s in
nova
tions
e td
ai
price
s nd
sta
ord
rts ion
s
trad
e di
stor
tions
land
-use
cha
wru
PRoMoTiNG SuSTAiNAble biofuelS
e
Whatrsquos driving biofuels growthBiofuels have existed for over a hundred years ndash Henry Ford designed his Model T to run on bioethanol ndash but they have mostly been unable to compete with fuels derived from crude oil New government energy policies subsidies and tax exemptions are now stimulating biofuels production which has doubled since 1998 and is predicted to double again by 20115 There are a number of reasons why governments favour biofuels
Combating climate change
Transport is a signifcant contributor to
climate change accounting for around
25 of man-made greenhouse gas
emissions globally
In principle the use of biofuels can help
reduce transportrsquos impact on climate
change This is because the plants used
to make the fuels absorb carbon dioxide
(CO2) ndash the most important greenhouse
gas ndash as they grow The gas is later
released when the biofuels are used
However biofuels are not carbon neutral
It takes energy to grow and harvest the
plants and to process and distribute
biofuels The entire process emits CO2
and fertilisers emit nitrous oxide (N2O) a
powerful greenhouse gas (see graphic 4)
The amount of energy needed to make
different biofuels varies considerably This
makes it vital to take the entire production
process into account when assessing
the potential of biofuels to help reduce
transport CO2 emissions Read more about
CO2 performance overleaf
Technology and innovation
Unlike other renewable fuels such
as hydrogen the infrastructure to
manufacture and distribute biofuels is in
place today Biofuels are also compatible
with todayrsquos vehicles and power
generation technology
In 2006 $26 billion6 was invested in
biofuels The International Energy Agency
(IEA)7 estimates that between 2005 and
2030 it will cost $160 billion to expand
biofuel production to fuel 4 of global
road transport and $225 billion to fuel 7
Energy security
Global energy demands are increasing
rapidly The worldrsquos population has
doubled in the last four decades ndash to
around 66 billion in 2004 ndash and is
expected to exceed 9 billion8 by 2050
Rapid development particularly in China
and India is increasing wealth and this is
boosting demands for energy and transport
There were around 900 million vehicles
on the road in 2000 but this is forecast to
increase to over 2 billion by 20509
Fossil fuels (oil coal and gas) are
expected to be the dominant source of
energy for the foreseeable future But
production has already peaked in many
major oil-producing countries and new
developments are increasingly located in
environmentally challenging and politically
unstable parts of the world This has
resulted in high oil prices which the IEA
predicts will remain between $48ndash$62
until 203010 Some analysts predict 2030
prices could be as high as $10011 High oil
prices hit developing countries the hardest
ndash some spend six times as much on fuel as
on health12
Biofuels are seen by governments as a
secure source of energy and a way to
reduce reliance on imported fossil fuels
Brazil has replaced around 1513 of its
petrol consumption with bioethanol
according to the IEA The Washington Post puts this fgure at 4014
Rural development
Biofuels can help boost farm incomes
Globalisation and the industrialisation of
farming have reduced the price farmers
get for their produce Demand for the
agricultural commodities used to make
biofuels is reversing this trend In the
developed world this is creating jobs
and reducing the need for subsidies
for farmers
[4] biofuel co2 lifecYcle iMPAcTS
CO2
Fertilising
Harvesting Transporting
Processing
Transporting
Use
Growing
CO2
CO2 CO2
CO2
CO2
CO2
Energy
EnergyEnergy
EnergyEnergy
Energy
N2O
defo
rest
atio
n la
nd-u
se ch
ange
hig
h fo
od p
rices
land
-use
cha
e h
igh
food
pric
es f
ood
shor
tage
s la
nd a
vaila
bilit
y
food
shortag
es land ava
ilability
trad
e dist
or
tions
rura
l dev
elop
men
t en
ergy
secu
rity
CO2 savi
ngs sust
ainab
ilit
y sta
ndar
ds
trad
e di
stor
tions
wat
er sh
orta
ges
biodi
versi
ty lo
ss
ener
gy s
ecur
ity C
O2
sav
ngs
sus
tain
abilit
y st
anda
rds
inno
vatio
ns
Sources of information1 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
2 International Energy Agency httpieaorgtextbasework2004eswg21_NCVpdf
3 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
4 httpwwwbiodieselorgresourcesfuelfactsheetsstandards_and_warrantiesshtm
5 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
6 United Nations Environment Programme Global Trends in Sustainable Energy Investment 2007
7 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
8 United Nations World Population to 2300 2004
9 World Business Council for Sustainable Development Energy amp Climate Change Facts and Trends to 2050 2004
10 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
11 Energy Information Administration Annual Energy Outlook 2007
12 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
13 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
14 Washington Post 200807
15 International Energy Agency Biofuels for Transport ndash An International Perspective 2004
16 Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ 2006
17 Delft Hydraulics
18 Based on Food and Agriculture Organization data available at wwwwaterfootprintorg
19 United Nations World Population to 2300 2004
20 Economist 23607
21 International Monetary Fund World Economic Report April 2007
22 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and DevelopmentFood and Agriculture Organization Agricultural Outlook 2007-2016
23 Food and Agriculture Organization State of Food Insecurity in the World 2006
24 International Energy Agency Biofuels For Transport An International Perspective 2004
25 Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ (2006) and Delft Hydraulics
Rainforest Deforestation Impacts [7] graphic
Journal of Cleaner Production 2006 Palm Oil and the Emission of Carbon-Based Greenhouse Gases Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ
Journal of Tropical Forest Science 2005 An Assessment of Changes in Biomass Carbon Stocks in Tree Crops and Forests in Malaysia Henson IE
Oil World Annual 2007 ISTA Mielke GmbH
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Volume 2 Energy 2006
Unilever NVWeena 455 PO Box 7603000 DK RotterdamThe NetherlandsT +31 (0)10 217 4000F +31 (0)10 217 4798
Commercial Register RotterdamNumber 24051830
Unilever PLCPO Box 68100 Victoria Embankment London EC4P 4BQ United KingdomT +44 (0)20 7822 5252F +44 (0)20 7822 5951
Unilever PLC registered offceUnilever PLCPort SunlightWirralMerseyside CH62 4ZDUnited Kingdom
Registered in England and WalesCompany Number 41424
wwwunilevercom
Writing and consultancy Context
Design and production Red Letter Design
Illustrations (Graphics 4 and 7) KJA-artistscom
Printing Scanplus (on paper made from responsibly managed forests)
PRoMoTiNG SuSTAiNAble biofuelS
What are biofuels Biofuels are made by processing food crops and other plants animal products or wastes (collectively known as biomass) These can be burnt to generate electricity or heat and are increasingly being used as transport fuels
Changes in government energy policies
are accelerating demand for liquid or
gaseous biofuels used in transport (see
facing page)
Transport biofuels can be distributed using
existing technology and used in todayrsquos
vehicles without modifcation when mixed
with petrol or diesel or in adapted vehicles
if used neat or in high concentrations
There are many different biofuels made
using a variety of production processes
and feedstocks There are two categories
First-generation biofuels made from
food crops These are widely used today
Second-generation biofuels made from
non-food crops These are in development
and will not be widely commercially
available for at least fve to ten years
First-generation biofuels
First-generation biofuels are made from
food crops including wheat rapeseed
corn soya and sugarcane
There are two main types of frst-generation
biofuels now in commercial use
Bioethanol Bioethanol is made by fermenting sugars
produced by plants (similar to beer and
wine production) Bioethanol accounts for
around 851 of global biofuel production
and is mainly produced from corn and
sugarcane
Bioethanol is usually blended with petrol ndash
todayrsquos fuel standards allow bioethanol to
be mixed with petrol in volumes up to 5
in Europe and 10 in the USA Bioethanol
can be used at higher concentrations
or neat For example in Brazil all petrol
contains at least 20ndash25 bioethanol and
many vehicles have been adapted to run
on 100 bioethanol
Bioethanol has a lower energy density
than petrol This makes it about 402 less
fuel effcient
[1] fiRST-GeNeRATioN biofuelS bioeThANol Production process
Sugarcane Corn
Starch
Sugar
fermentation
bioethanol
Petrol mix
Biodiesel Biodiesel is a blend of methyl esters (a type
of biofuel) and diesel Methyl esters are
produced by a chemical reaction between a
vegetable oil and an alcohol They are made
from rapeseed (primarily) palm oil and
soybean oil and account for around 153
of global biofuel production
Biodiesel is the most commonly used
biofuel in Europe where fuel standards
allow 5 blends USA fuel standards allow
[2] fiRST-GeNeRATioN biofuelS bioDieSel Production process
Soybean oil Palm oil Rapeseed oil
Transesterifcation
Methyl esters
blends of up to 204 Specially designed
vehicles can run on 100 biodiesel
Second-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels are made from
non-food feedstocks such as wood and
straw The production process uses the
whole plant rather than just the plant
starches or sugars that are used to make
frst-generation biofuels This means waste
materials from agricultural and forestry can
be used as feedstocks
[3] SecoND-GeNeRATioN biofuelS
biomass to liquid celluose ethanol production process production process
Biomass including Special crops such agricultural as fast growing
residues woody plants
Thermochemical biochemical treatment treatment gasifcation enzymatic hydrolysis
Synthesis gas Sugar
Synthesis fermentation
hydrocarbons cellulose ethanol
Diesel mix Petrol mix
There are a number of second-generation
biofuels under development These include
cellulose ethanol which is produced from
straw using enzymes and can be mixed
with petrol biomass-to-liquid fuel which
is made from wood feedstocks and can be
blended with diesel and biomethane a
gas made from organic material (such as
manure and straw) which can be used in
modifed petrol and diesel engines
Diesel mix
[2] fiRST-GeNeRATioN biofuelS bioDieSel Production process
Soybean oil
Diesel mix
Palm oil Rapeseed oil
Methyl esters
Transesterifcation
[1] fiRST-GeNeRATioN biofuelS bioeThANol Production process
Sugarcane
Sugar
Petrol mix
Corn
Starch
bioethanol
fermentation
biomass to liquid production process
Petrol mixDiesel mix
celluose ethanol production process
[3] SecoND-GeNeRATioN biofuelS
biochemical treatment
enzymatic hydrolysis
Sugar
fermentation
cellulose ethanol
Thermochemical treatmentgasifcation
Synthesis gas
Synthesis
hydrocarbons
Biomass including agricultural
residues
Special crops such as fast growing woody plants
Changes in government energy policies
are accelerating demand for liquid or
gaseous biofuels used in transport (see
facing page)
Transport biofuels can be distributed using
existing technology and used in todayrsquos
vehicles without modifcation when mixed
with petrol or diesel or in adapted vehicles
if used neat or in high concentrations
There are many different biofuels made
using a variety of production processes
and feedstocks There are two categories
First-generation biofuels made from
food crops These are widely used today
Second-generation biofuels made from
non-food crops These are in development
and will not be widely commercially
available for at least fve to ten years
First-generation biofuels
First-generation biofuels are made from
food crops including wheat rapeseed
corn soya and sugarcane
There are two main types of frst-generation
biofuels now in commercial use
Bioethanol Bioethanol is made by fermenting sugars
produced by plants (similar to beer and
wine production) Bioethanol accounts for
around 851 of global biofuel production
and is mainly produced from corn and
sugarcane
Bioethanol is usually blended with petrol ndash
todayrsquos fuel standards allow bioethanol to
be mixed with petrol in volumes up to 5
in Europe and 10 in the USA Bioethanol
can be used at higher concentrations
or neat For example in Brazil all petrol
contains at least 20ndash25 bioethanol and
many vehicles have been adapted to run
on 100 bioethanol
Bioethanol has a lower energy density
than petrol This makes it about 402 less
fuel effcient
defo
rest
atio
n la
nd-u
se ch
ange
hig
h fo
od p
rices
land
-use
cha
e h
igh
food
pric
es f
ood
shor
tage
s la
nd a
vaila
bilit
y
food
shortag
es land ava
ilability
trad
e dist
or
tions
rura
l dev
elop
men
t en
ergy
secu
rity
CO2 savi
ngs sust
ainab
ilit
y sta
ndar
ds
trad
e di
stor
tions
wat
er sh
orta
ges
biodi
versi
ty lo
ss
ener
gy s
ecur
ity C
O2
sav
ngs
sus
tain
abilit
y st
anda
rds
inno
vatio
ns
What are biofuelsBiofuels are made by processing food crops and other plants animal products or wastes (collectively known as biomass) These can be burnt to generate electricity or heat and are increasingly being used as transport fuels
Sources of information1 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
2 International Energy Agency httpieaorgtextbasework2004eswg21_NCVpdf
3 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
4 httpwwwbiodieselorgresourcesfuelfactsheetsstandards_and_warrantiesshtm
5 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
6 United Nations Environment Programme Global Trends in Sustainable Energy Investment 2007
7 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
8 United Nations World Population to 2300 2004
9 World Business Council for Sustainable Development Energy amp Climate Change Facts and Trends to 2050 2004
10 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
11 Energy Information Administration Annual Energy Outlook 2007
12 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
13 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
14 Washington Post 200807
15 International Energy Agency Biofuels for Transport ndash An International Perspective 2004
16 Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ 2006
17 Delft Hydraulics
18 Based on Food and Agriculture Organization data available at wwwwaterfootprintorg
19 United Nations World Population to 2300 2004
20 Economist 23607
21 International Monetary Fund World Economic Report April 2007
22 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and DevelopmentFood and Agriculture Organization Agricultural Outlook 2007-2016
23 Food and Agriculture Organization State of Food Insecurity in the World 2006
24 International Energy Agency Biofuels For Transport An International Perspective 2004
25 Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ (2006) and Delft Hydraulics
Rainforest Deforestation Impacts [7] graphic
Journal of Cleaner Production 2006 Palm Oil and the Emission of Carbon-Based Greenhouse Gases Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ
Journal of Tropical Forest Science 2005 An Assessment of Changes in Biomass Carbon Stocks in Tree Crops and Forests in Malaysia Henson IE
Oil World Annual 2007 ISTA Mielke GmbH
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Volume 2 Energy 2006
Unilever NVWeena 455 PO Box 7603000 DK RotterdamThe NetherlandsT +31 (0)10 217 4000F +31 (0)10 217 4798
Commercial Register RotterdamNumber 24051830
Unilever PLCPO Box 68100 Victoria Embankment London EC4P 4BQ United KingdomT +44 (0)20 7822 5252F +44 (0)20 7822 5951
Unilever PLC registered offceUnilever PLCPort SunlightWirralMerseyside CH62 4ZDUnited Kingdom
Registered in England and WalesCompany Number 41424
wwwunilevercom
Writing and consultancy Context
Design and production Red Letter Design
Illustrations (Graphics 4 and 7) KJA-artistscom
Printing Scanplus (on paper made from responsibly managed forests)
PRoMoTiNG SuSTAiNAble biofuelS
Biodiesel Biodiesel is a blend of methyl esters (a type
of biofuel) and diesel Methyl esters are
produced by a chemical reaction between a
vegetable oil and an alcohol They are made
from rapeseed (primarily) palm oil and
soybean oil and account for around 153
of global biofuel production
Biodiesel is the most commonly used
biofuel in Europe where fuel standards
allow 5 blends USA fuel standards allow
blends of up to 204 Specially designed
vehicles can run on 100 biodiesel
Second-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels are made from
non-food feedstocks such as wood and
straw The production process uses the
whole plant rather than just the plant
starches or sugars that are used to make
frst-generation biofuels This means waste
materials from agricultural and forestry can
be used as feedstocks
There are a number of second-generation
biofuels under development These include
cellulose ethanol which is produced from
straw using enzymes and can be mixed
with petrol biomass-to-liquid fuel which
is made from wood feedstocks and can be
blended with diesel and biomethane a
gas made from organic material (such as
manure and straw) which can be used in
modifed petrol and diesel engines
Whatrsquos driving biofuels growth Biofuels have existed for over a hundred years ndash Henry Ford designed his Model T to run on bioethanol ndash but they have mostly been unable to compete with fuels derived from crude oil New government energy policies subsidies and tax exemptions are now stimulating biofuels production which has doubled since 1998 and is predicted to double again by 20115 There are a number of reasons why governments favour biofuels
[4] biofuel co2 lifecYcle iMPAcTS
Fertilising
CO2
CO2
N2O Growing
Energy
Combating climate change
Transport is a signifcant contributor to
climate change accounting for around
25 of man-made greenhouse gas
emissions globally
In principle the use of biofuels can help
reduce transportrsquos impact on climate
change This is because the plants used
to make the fuels absorb carbon dioxide
(CO2) ndash the most important greenhouse
gas ndash as they grow The gas is later
released when the biofuels are used
However biofuels are not carbon neutral
It takes energy to grow and harvest the
plants and to process and distribute
biofuels The entire process emits CO2
and fertilisers emit nitrous oxide (N2O) a
powerful greenhouse gas (see graphic 4)
The amount of energy needed to make
different biofuels varies considerably This
makes it vital to take the entire production
process into account when assessing
the potential of biofuels to help reduce
transport CO2 emissions Read more about
CO2 performance overleaf
Technology and innovation
Unlike other renewable fuels such
as hydrogen the infrastructure to
Processing
Harvesting Transporting
CO2
CO2 CO2
Energy
Energy Energy
manufacture and distribute biofuels is in
place today Biofuels are also compatible
with todayrsquos vehicles and power
generation technology
In 2006 $26 billion6 was invested in
biofuels The International Energy Agency
(IEA)7 estimates that between 2005 and
2030 it will cost $160 billion to expand
biofuel production to fuel 4 of global
road transport and $225 billion to fuel 7
Energy security
Global energy demands are increasing
rapidly The worldrsquos population has
doubled in the last four decades ndash to
around 66 billion in 2004 ndash and is
expected to exceed 9 billion8 by 2050
Rapid development particularly in China
and India is increasing wealth and this is
boosting demands for energy and transport
There were around 900 million vehicles
on the road in 2000 but this is forecast to
increase to over 2 billion by 20509
Fossil fuels (oil coal and gas) are
expected to be the dominant source of
energy for the foreseeable future But
production has already peaked in many
major oil-producing countries and new
developments are increasingly located in
environmentally challenging and politically
Transporting
CO2 Use
CO2
Energy
Energy
unstable parts of the world This has
resulted in high oil prices which the IEA
predicts will remain between $48ndash$62
until 203010 Some analysts predict 2030
prices could be as high as $10011 High oil
prices hit developing countries the hardest
ndash some spend six times as much on fuel as
on health12
Biofuels are seen by governments as a
secure source of energy and a way to
reduce reliance on imported fossil fuels
Brazil has replaced around 1513 of its
petrol consumption with bioethanol
according to the IEA The Washington Post puts this fgure at 4014
Rural development
Biofuels can help boost farm incomes
Globalisation and the industrialisation of
farming have reduced the price farmers
get for their produce Demand for the
agricultural commodities used to make
biofuels is reversing this trend In the
developed world this is creating jobs
and reducing the need for subsidies
for farmers
Sources FOLicht UN
[10] biofuelS eNeRGY DeliveRY(x 1000 litres of diesel equivalent per hectare)
Source FNR
1013 25
4054
Biomethane(energy crops)
Biomass- to-liquid
Bioethanol(wheat)
Biodiesel(rapeseed oil)
Bioethanol(sugar cane)
Sustainability criteria
The social and environmental impacts
of biofuels vary considerably
depending on the type of feedstock
used where it is grown and the processes
needed to turn it into biofuels
Sustainability criteria are required to provide
confdence in the labelling and identifcation
of specifc types of biofuel The criteria should
[8] PRoJecTeD GRoWTh iN fooD coNSuMPTioN
Source OECD-FAO 2006
-
-
-
-
-
-
2004 2009 2014 2019
100
110
120
130
140
150 Oil and oilseed meals
SugarMeat
CerealsDairy
1st generation biofuel 2nd generation biofuel
cover the lifecycle CO2 emissions and impacts
on natural habitats as well as socio-economic
factors such as the availability of food for the
local population where feedstocks are produced
In 2007 the Dutch Government announced
sustainability criteria and has proposed a system
to enable traceability of feedstocks by 2020
The UK Government has proposed that 80 of
biofuels meet sustainability standards including
CO2 reduction requirements by 2010ndash11 The
EU is developing sustainability criteria
Business is also developing sustainability
standards through initiatives such as the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (chaired by
Unilever) and the Roundtable on Sustainable
Biofuels The latter aims to launch draft
sustainability standards in early 2008
90
2015
2015
[9] PRoPoRTioN of cRoP uSeD foR biofuelS ()
Source The German Marshall Fund of the USA
Brazil sugarcane USA corn
EU rapeseedEU cereals
1995 1995
19951995
2005 2005
20052005
2015
2015
39
45
lt15
20
60
43
16
70
20
0
50USATARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2030 30 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
11800000 tonnes
USA accounts for 15 of global biodiesel production
ChinaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 15 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
800000 tonnes
China has imposed a moratorium on projects making bioethanol fuel from corn and other basic food crops
BrazilTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2010 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
12900000 tonnes
IndiaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 20 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
240000 tonnes
EUTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
730000 tonnes
Europe accounts for 85 of global biodiesel production
Reduction in US land used for food crops pushes production elsewhere potentially causing deforestation
Brazil sugarcane and soybean
European demand for biodiesel feedstock raises palm oil price causing deforestation
Europe doesnrsquot have enough land to meet its biofuels targets and will be dependent on imports
USA corn wheat and soybean
Bioethanol production has pushed up corn prices sparking protests in Mexico
The worldrsquos poorest are already being affected by higher food prices
98 of Indonesiarsquos natural rainforest will be degraded or gone by 2022
KEY
Issues with food security
Issues with GHGs
Issues with sustainability
Issues with trade
Areas of tropical rainforest
Trade
Unintended consequences
Feedstocks
Europe rapeseed oil and wheat
The unilever positionUnilever supports sustainable biofuels that deliver social and environmental benefts across their entire lifecycle
Unilever supports renewable energy
initiatives that deliver benefts on a lifecycle
basis helping to combat climate change and
reduce dependency on fossil fuels Around
17 of the energy we use for our operations
comes from renewable sources
Why the issue matters to Unilever
Two-thirds of the raw materials we use
come from agriculture These materials are
essential to our business and Unilever has
a clear interest in how they are grown and
in securing future supplies That is why
we have worked to improve the social and
environmental standards of agriculture
for more than a decade Our sustainable
agriculture programmes include palm oil
oilseed rape sunfowers spinach tomatoes
and tea We are also a member of several
sustainability initiatives including the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil
Demand for biofuels feedstock has already
reduced the availability of raw materials and
driven up prices We are concerned that
increased demand will destabilise world
food supply and undermine sustainable
agriculture Use of vegetable oils such as
rapeseed oil for biofuels could also create
shortages driving consumers to less healthy
animal fats
Lifecycle analysis
Unilever believes that individual biofuels
should be examined carefully to ensure
that the unintended environmental
(deforestation and biodiversity loss) and
socio-economic (food security) consequences
do not undermine the positive impacts
Biofuels must also be evaluated across their
lifecycle to achieve genuine greenhouse gas
(GHG) reductions
Biomass is a valuable resource Using it
to generate heat and electricity is a more
effcient and cost-effective way of reducing
CO2 emissions than using it to make
transport fuels24 New vehicle technologies
such as electric and hybrid and more
effcient engines offer signifcant scope
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
from transport
First-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that some frst-generation
biofuels are neither environmentally effcient
nor cost-effective ways to reduce emissions
Many studies have shown that several frst-
generation biofuels have poor performance
with regard to reducing GHG emissions and
dependency on fossil fuels Some even cause
more GHG emissions than the fossil fuels
they replace25
We are concerned that the use of valuable
food crops for energy purposes will increase
pressure on ecosystems and biodiversity
Deforestation particularly to make way for
palm oil and soya beans could lead to the
devastation of the last remaining rainforests
in Borneo and the Amazon region
Second-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that the development
of second-generation biofuels that donrsquot
compete with food crops and have low
carbon emissions is essential The mainstream
market introduction of second-generation
biofuels would provide a strong incentive
for the application of renewable energy
technologies while minimising the negative
repercussions on food markets and food
security Unilever believes there is a strong
case for government and business investment
in new technologies and further research on
the sustainable use of biomass Support for
second-generation biofuels could be
accelerated through
n RampD facilitation and technology transfer
n Tax exemption andor subsidies
n Phasing out support for poor performing
frst-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels should be
required to achieve at least 50 GHG
savings compared to fossil fuels
Assessing sustainability
We believe governments worldwide have
the responsibility to subject their biofuel
policies to a full impact assessment These
assessments should cover environmental
social and economic impacts from the
regions of production to the end use
Policies which aim to reduce GHG emissions
should contain full lifecycle assessments for
individual biofuels This should ensure that
change in land use is included in the carbon
balance We propose that government
targets should be based on CO2 reductions
rather than volume as well as on availability
of feedstocks
Sustainability standards
Unilever believes sustainability criteria should
be introduced for the use of biomass within
energy programmes These should include
criteria at the production level as well as
criteria at a macro-level such as overall GHG
balance and energy effciency food security
and the protection of biodiversity and
ecosystems The use of biomass for energy
should not be stimulated by government
programmes without the application of
transparent sustainability criteria Proceeding
without these safeguards will risk unintended
consequences that could result in worse
climate change impacts natural habitat loss
and disruption of staple food supplies
1500 and 4600 litres of water18 to produce
just one litre of bioethanol There are already
water shortages in many regions and population
growth and climate change will further increase
competition for clean water and increase its cost
Land-use and food availability
The worldrsquos population is rapidly
increasing and is expected to exceed
9 billion19 by 2050 To feed this
growing population will require 50 more food
in the next 20 years
While higher food prices will beneft some
producers they negatively impact the economies
of food-importing countries Poor people who
spend a large proportion of their income on
food will suffer disproportionately compared
with the wealthy Mexico has already experienced
some of the negative consequences of the
growing US bioethanol industry In 2006
Mexicans took to the streets to protest at the
high price of tortillas (a corn bread staple) made
more expensive by demand for maize from USA
bioethanol producers
In 2007 the UN World Food Programme which
fghts famine in Africa announced that it could
no longer afford to maintain its current level of
support due to high commodity prices Its food
purchasing costs rose by almost 50 between
2002 and 2007 854 million23 people suffer from
hunger and this is increasing by an average of
4 million a year at current trends Increasing
food prices will mean that even more people will
depend on food aid
Land is a fnite resource
Some biofuels are much more land
effcient than others because of
higher feedstock yields per hectare and
more effcient production processes (see graphic
10) If we are to feed a growing population using
the fnite amount of agricultural land available
it is vital that governments choose to promote
biofuels that deliver the maximum possible
energy per hectare
First-generation biofuels
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from non-tropical
feedstocks (rape wheat and corn) are not land
effcient It would require a minimum of 26 of
the worldrsquos arable land to run just 20 of its cars
on these fuels
[11] GlobAl iMPAcTS AND uNiNTeNDeD coNSeQueNceS
In the past farmers have increased production
to meet growing demands But they are now
fnding it hard to keep up ndash in three of the four
years20 between 2003 and 2007 demand for
grains to feed people and livestock outstripped
supply As countries such as China and India
develop more people can afford meat and dairy
products This is driving up demand for agricultural
commodities The booming biofuels industry is
contributing further to this escalation in demand
First-generation biofuels compete with food
crops leading to rising food prices In future this
could jeopardise the worldrsquos ability to feed its
growing population Many other industries also
rely on raw materials like palm oil which are
being diverted to biofuel production
Increased demand higher prices
The biofuels industry is using an
increasing share of the worldrsquos food
crops (see graphic 9) which is driving
up prices Global food prices rose by 1021 in
2006 due to an increase in corn wheat and soya
bean oil prices Prices are predicted to rise by
20ndash5022 over the next decade (compared with
average levels over the last ten years)
Demand for biofuel feedstock increases prices
of other crops For example high demand for
corn to make bioethanol means US farmers are
producing less soya and wheat which is boosting
prices for those crops Biofuels are also raising
meat and dairy prices by pushing up the price of
animal feed
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from palm oil
and sugarcane are more land effcient but
there is limited potential to expand production
of the feedstocks without causing signifcant
environmental damage through loss of natural
forests and grasslands
Second-generation biofuels
To run 20 of the worldrsquos vehicles on second-
generation biofuels would require 7 of its
arable land The feedstocks for these fuels can
also be grown on other types of land such as
pastures and forests
Trade
Even at todayrsquos high oil prices most
biofuels cannot compete on cost with
petrol and diesel Biofuel producers
rely on government subsidies for their profts
Governments are beginning to set mandatory
targets to stimulate investment and demand
for biofuels This is further boosting the price
of agricultural commodities and contributing to
trade distortions
In Brazil a well-established biofuel industry and
low production costs means Brazilian bioethanol
is cost competitive with petrol and diesel The
EU and the USA have set trade barriers to
protect domestic biofuel industries from cheap
Brazilian bioethanol imports This is encouraging
the development of less cost-effective and less
sustainable biofuels This makes it more diffcult
for those developing countries that are better
suited to biofuels production to compete on
world markets
Many governments have proposed mandatory
biofuel targets that exceed their countryrsquos
production and land capacity In future this
could make these countries dependent on
foreign imports which will undermine their
energy security Commodity prices will continue
to rise as competition increases for limited
global supplies
unintended consequences Biofuels could help boost rural development while reducing CO2 emissions and reliance on crude oil But if biofuel strategies are not fully evaluated they could do more harm than good stimulating poor performing biofuels and stifing innovation
CO2 performance
Biofuels can help fght climate change
but CO2 savings vary signifcantly
between fuels (see graphic 5)
This is because the amount of energy needed
to produce different feedstocks (type of
crop and where it is grown) and to process
them into fuels varies considerably For
example using US corn it takes 06ndash08
litres of fossil fuels to produce an amount of
bioethanol equivalent to 1 litre of mineral
oil whereas it takes less than 01 litres of
fossil fuels to produce the same amount of
bioethanol using Brazilian sugarcane15
[5] co2 ReDucTioN of biofuelS coMPAReD WiTh foSSil fuelS ()
Biomass to liquid Bioethanol Fossil (2nd generation) (corn) fuel
Bioethanol USA
(wheat) EU 100
87 100
lt10 30
40-60
10
Bioethanol Biodiesel (sugarcane) (rapeseed)
Brazil EU
Source IEA Energy Technology Perspective 2006
Second-generation biofuels produce even
less CO2 as their feedstocks require fewer
agricultural inputs and production processes
are much more effcient
Biofuels cost more than petrol or diesel per
unit of energy because of the high cost of
feedstocks and production Using biodiesel
and bioethanol from crops grown in Europe
[6] biofuelS SAviNGS biofuels cost per tonne GhG reduction ($ per tonne co2 equivalent)
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Bioethanol (corn)
Bioethanol (grain)
Bioethanol (cellulose) 2002
Biodiesel Post 2010 (rapeseed)
Biodiesel (biomass)
-50 0 200 400 600 800
Source IEA Biofuels for transportation An international perspective 2004
and the USA as a carbon reduction strategy
will cost around $200-$250 per tonne of
CO2 avoided at 2004 prices The cost of
bioethanol from sugarcane as in Brazil
can be comparable to that of fossil fuels
(see graphic 6) Bioethanol from cellulose
(a second-generation biofuel) could already
provide CO2 reductions at less than $200 a
tonne It is likely to remain expensive to
reduce CO2 using biodiesel and bioethanol
from US and European crops even after
2010 The cost of using second-generation
biofuels could come down to under $100 a
tonne with large-scale production
As more governments encourage the use of
biofuels and set mandatory targets demand
will outstrip supply leading to higher prices
for frst- and second-generation biofuels
Deforestation and land-use change
The demand for soya and palm oil
threatens rainforests in Brazil
Indonesia and Malaysia which
are being cleared for plantations These oils
are used by a number of industries but the
growth in biodiesel production is increasing
demand signifcantly
[7] RAiNfoReST DefoReSTATioN iMPAcTS carbon storage and co2 emissions per hectare in Se Asia
230 830 48 tonnes tonnes tonnes carbon CO2 carbon
Rainforest Deforestation Palm plantations Carbon stored Carbon released as Stores only 20 of above ground CO2 due to clearing carbon per hectare
and burning compared to rain-forest (equivalent to
165 tonnes CO2)
Sources see back page
Rainforests store large amounts of carbon
above ground and in the soil which is
released when they are cleared (see
graphic 7) A much smaller amount of carbon
is absorbed by the plantations which replace
the forests This means biofuels grown in
tropical countries can contribute more to
climate change than fossil fuels when their
land-use impact is taken into account
Studies have shown that biodiesel made from
palm oil produces three16 to ten17 times more
CO2 than an equivalent amount of fossil
fuel The situation is even worse for biodiesel
made from soya as the crop yields less oil
and stores less carbon than palm plantations
Peat lands wetlands and grasslands also
release large amounts of carbon if converted
to agricultural use Most biodiesel is made
from rapeseed oil rather than palm oil and
soya bean oil But as an increasing share of
rapeseed oil is used for fuels rather than for
food more soya and palm is being planted
to compensate
Deforestation and land-use change means
that while biofuels can appear to help
governments meet their national greenhouse
gas emissions reduction targets they could in
reality be more damaging to climate change
globally when land-use impact is considered
This means that it is vital for national policies
to take into account the full life-cycle climate
impact of different biofuels
Biodiversity loss
The destruction of tropical forests
and grasslands to make way for
soya and palm plantations causes
signifcant destruction of plant and animal
species including endangered species such
as the orang-utan
Biofuel feedstocks are often grown as a
single crop over a wide area Known as
monoculture this brings high yields but
harms biodiversity These impacts can be
reduced to an extent through mixed planting
and leaving wild areas
Water scarcity
Both frst and second-generation
biofuels require large amounts of
water to grow and process the
feedstocks For example it takes between
Sources FOLicht UN
Sustainability criteria
The social and environmental impacts
of biofuels vary considerably
depending on the type of feedstock
used where it is grown and the processes
needed to turn it into biofuels
Sustainability criteria are required to provide
confdence in the labelling and identifcation
of specifc types of biofuel The criteria should
100
[5] co2 ReDucTioN of biofuelS coMPAReD WiTh foSSil fuelS ()
Source IEA Energy Technology Perspective 2006
Bioethanol (corn) USA
Bioethanol (wheat)
EU
Biomass to liquid(2nd generation)
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Brazil
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
EU
Fossil fuel
lt10 40-6087
100
1030
[7] RAiNfoReST DefoReSTATioN iMPAcTScarbon storage and co2 emissions per hectare in Se Asia
Sources see back page
RainforestCarbon stored above ground
230tonnescarbon
DeforestationCarbon released as CO2 due to clearing
and burning
830tonnes
CO2
Palm plantationsStores only 20 of carbon per hectare compared to rain-
forest (equivalent to 165 tonnes CO2)
48tonnescarbon
[6] biofuelS SAviNGSbiofuels cost per tonne GhG reduction ($ per tonne co2 equivalent)
Source IEA Biofuels for transportation An international perspective 2004
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Bioethanol (corn)
Bioethanol (grain)
Bioethanol (cellulose)
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
Biodiesel (biomass)
0 200 400 600 800-50
2002Post 2010
cover the lifecycle CO2 emissions and impacts
on natural habitats as well as socio-economic
factors such as the availability of food for the
local population where feedstocks are produced
In 2007 the Dutch Government announced
sustainability criteria and has proposed a system
to enable traceability of feedstocks by 2020
The UK Government has proposed that 80 of
biofuels meet sustainability standards including
CO2 reduction requirements by 2010ndash11 The
EU is developing sustainability criteria
Business is also developing sustainability
standards through initiatives such as the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (chaired by
Unilever) and the Roundtable on Sustainable
Biofuels The latter aims to launch draft
sustainability standards in early 2008
USATARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2030 30 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
11800000 tonnes
USA accounts for 15 of global biodiesel production
ChinaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 15 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
800000 tonnes
China has imposed a moratorium on projects making bioethanol fuel from corn and other basic food crops
BrazilTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2010 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
12900000 tonnes
IndiaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 20 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
240000 tonnes
EUTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
730000 tonnes
Europe accounts for 85 of global biodiesel production
Reduction in US land used for food crops pushes production elsewhere potentially causing deforestation
Brazil sugarcane and soybean
European demand for biodiesel feedstock raises palm oil price causing deforestation
Europe doesnrsquot have enough land to meet its biofuels targets and will be dependent on imports
USA corn wheat and soybean
Bioethanol production has pushed up corn prices sparking protests in Mexico
The worldrsquos poorest are already being affected by higher food prices
98 of Indonesiarsquos natural rainforest will be degraded or gone by 2022
KEY
Issues with food security
Issues with GHGs
Issues with sustainability
Issues with trade
Areas of tropical rainforest
Trade
Unintended consequences
Feedstocks
Europe rapeseed oil and wheat
The unilever positionUnilever supports sustainable biofuels that deliver social and environmental benefts across their entire lifecycle
Unilever supports renewable energy
initiatives that deliver benefts on a lifecycle
basis helping to combat climate change and
reduce dependency on fossil fuels Around
17 of the energy we use for our operations
comes from renewable sources
Why the issue matters to Unilever
Two-thirds of the raw materials we use
come from agriculture These materials are
essential to our business and Unilever has
a clear interest in how they are grown and
in securing future supplies That is why
we have worked to improve the social and
environmental standards of agriculture
for more than a decade Our sustainable
agriculture programmes include palm oil
oilseed rape sunfowers spinach tomatoes
and tea We are also a member of several
sustainability initiatives including the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil
Demand for biofuels feedstock has already
reduced the availability of raw materials and
driven up prices We are concerned that
increased demand will destabilise world
food supply and undermine sustainable
agriculture Use of vegetable oils such as
rapeseed oil for biofuels could also create
shortages driving consumers to less healthy
animal fats
Lifecycle analysis
Unilever believes that individual biofuels
should be examined carefully to ensure
that the unintended environmental
(deforestation and biodiversity loss) and
socio-economic (food security) consequences
do not undermine the positive impacts
Biofuels must also be evaluated across their
lifecycle to achieve genuine greenhouse gas
(GHG) reductions
Biomass is a valuable resource Using it
to generate heat and electricity is a more
effcient and cost-effective way of reducing
CO2 emissions than using it to make
transport fuels24 New vehicle technologies
such as electric and hybrid and more
effcient engines offer signifcant scope
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
from transport
First-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that some frst-generation
biofuels are neither environmentally effcient
nor cost-effective ways to reduce emissions
Many studies have shown that several frst-
generation biofuels have poor performance
with regard to reducing GHG emissions and
dependency on fossil fuels Some even cause
more GHG emissions than the fossil fuels
they replace25
We are concerned that the use of valuable
food crops for energy purposes will increase
pressure on ecosystems and biodiversity
Deforestation particularly to make way for
palm oil and soya beans could lead to the
devastation of the last remaining rainforests
in Borneo and the Amazon region
Second-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that the development
of second-generation biofuels that donrsquot
compete with food crops and have low
carbon emissions is essential The mainstream
market introduction of second-generation
biofuels would provide a strong incentive
for the application of renewable energy
technologies while minimising the negative
repercussions on food markets and food
security Unilever believes there is a strong
case for government and business investment
in new technologies and further research on
the sustainable use of biomass Support for
second-generation biofuels could be
accelerated through
n RampD facilitation and technology transfer
n Tax exemption andor subsidies
n Phasing out support for poor performing
frst-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels should be
required to achieve at least 50 GHG
savings compared to fossil fuels
Assessing sustainability
We believe governments worldwide have
the responsibility to subject their biofuel
policies to a full impact assessment These
assessments should cover environmental
social and economic impacts from the
regions of production to the end use
Policies which aim to reduce GHG emissions
should contain full lifecycle assessments for
individual biofuels This should ensure that
change in land use is included in the carbon
balance We propose that government
targets should be based on CO2 reductions
rather than volume as well as on availability
of feedstocks
Sustainability standards
Unilever believes sustainability criteria should
be introduced for the use of biomass within
energy programmes These should include
criteria at the production level as well as
criteria at a macro-level such as overall GHG
balance and energy effciency food security
and the protection of biodiversity and
ecosystems The use of biomass for energy
should not be stimulated by government
programmes without the application of
transparent sustainability criteria Proceeding
without these safeguards will risk unintended
consequences that could result in worse
climate change impacts natural habitat loss
and disruption of staple food supplies
unintended consequencesBiofuels could help boost rural development while reducing CO2 emissions and reliance on crude oil But if biofuel strategies are not fully evaluated they could do more harm than good stimulating poor performing biofuels and stifing innovation
CO2 performance
Biofuels can help fght climate change
but CO2 savings vary signifcantly
between fuels (see graphic 5)
This is because the amount of energy needed
to produce different feedstocks (type of
crop and where it is grown) and to process
them into fuels varies considerably For
example using US corn it takes 06ndash08
litres of fossil fuels to produce an amount of
bioethanol equivalent to 1 litre of mineral
oil whereas it takes less than 01 litres of
fossil fuels to produce the same amount of
bioethanol using Brazilian sugarcane15
[11] GlobAl iMPAcTS AND uNiNTeNDeD coNSeQueNceS
Second-generation biofuels produce even
less CO2 as their feedstocks require fewer
agricultural inputs and production processes
are much more effcient
Biofuels cost more than petrol or diesel per
unit of energy because of the high cost of
feedstocks and production Using biodiesel
and bioethanol from crops grown in Europe
and the USA as a carbon reduction strategy
will cost around $200-$250 per tonne of
CO2 avoided at 2004 prices The cost of
bioethanol from sugarcane as in Brazil
can be comparable to that of fossil fuels
(see graphic 6) Bioethanol from cellulose
(a second-generation biofuel) could already
provide CO2 reductions at less than $200 a
tonne It is likely to remain expensive to
reduce CO2 using biodiesel and bioethanol
from US and European crops even after
2010 The cost of using second-generation
biofuels could come down to under $100 a
tonne with large-scale production
As more governments encourage the use of
biofuels and set mandatory targets demand
will outstrip supply leading to higher prices
for frst- and second-generation biofuels
Deforestation and land-use change
The demand for soya and palm oil
threatens rainforests in Brazil
Indonesia and Malaysia which
are being cleared for plantations These oils
are used by a number of industries but the
growth in biodiesel production is increasing
demand signifcantly
Rainforests store large amounts of carbon
above ground and in the soil which is
released when they are cleared (see
graphic 7) A much smaller amount of carbon
is absorbed by the plantations which replace
the forests This means biofuels grown in
tropical countries can contribute more to
climate change than fossil fuels when their
land-use impact is taken into account
Studies have shown that biodiesel made from
palm oil produces three16 to ten17 times more
CO2 than an equivalent amount of fossil
fuel The situation is even worse for biodiesel
made from soya as the crop yields less oil
and stores less carbon than palm plantations
Peat lands wetlands and grasslands also
release large amounts of carbon if converted
to agricultural use Most biodiesel is made
from rapeseed oil rather than palm oil and
soya bean oil But as an increasing share of
rapeseed oil is used for fuels rather than for
food more soya and palm is being planted
to compensate
Deforestation and land-use change means
that while biofuels can appear to help
governments meet their national greenhouse
gas emissions reduction targets they could in
reality be more damaging to climate change
globally when land-use impact is considered
This means that it is vital for national policies
to take into account the full life-cycle climate
impact of different biofuels
Biodiversity loss
The destruction of tropical forests
and grasslands to make way for
soya and palm plantations causes
signifcant destruction of plant and animal
species including endangered species such
as the orang-utan
Biofuel feedstocks are often grown as a
single crop over a wide area Known as
monoculture this brings high yields but
harms biodiversity These impacts can be
reduced to an extent through mixed planting
and leaving wild areas
Water scarcity
Both frst and second-generation
biofuels require large amounts of
water to grow and process the
feedstocks For example it takes between
1500 and 4600 litres of water18 to produce [9] PRoPoRTioN of cRoP uSeD foR biofuelS () [10] biofuelS eNeRGY DeliveRY just one litre of bioethanol There are already
Brazil sugarcane USA corn (x 1000 litres of diesel equivalent per hectare)
water shortages in many regions and population Biodiesel Bioethanol
growth and climate change will further increase (rapeseed oil) (sugar cane)
competition for clean water and increase its cost 70 50
Land-use and food availability
The worldrsquos population is rapidly
increasing and is expected to exceed
9 billion19 by 2050 To feed this
growing population will require 50 more food
in the next 20 years
[8] PRoJecTeD GRoWTh iN fooD coNSuMPTioN
Oil and oilseed meals
150 -
140 -Sugar Meat
130 -Cereals Dairy
120 -
110 -
100 -
2004 2009 2014 2019
Source OECD-FAO 2006
In the past farmers have increased production
to meet growing demands But they are now
fnding it hard to keep up ndash in three of the four
years20 between 2003 and 2007 demand for
grains to feed people and livestock outstripped
supply As countries such as China and India
develop more people can afford meat and dairy
products This is driving up demand for agricultural
commodities The booming biofuels industry is
contributing further to this escalation in demand
First-generation biofuels compete with food
crops leading to rising food prices In future this
could jeopardise the worldrsquos ability to feed its
growing population Many other industries also
rely on raw materials like palm oil which are
being diverted to biofuel production
Increased demand higher prices
The biofuels industry is using an
increasing share of the worldrsquos food
crops (see graphic 9) which is driving
up prices Global food prices rose by 1021 in
2006 due to an increase in corn wheat and soya
bean oil prices Prices are predicted to rise by
20ndash5022 over the next decade (compared with
average levels over the last ten years)
Demand for biofuel feedstock increases prices
of other crops For example high demand for
corn to make bioethanol means US farmers are
producing less soya and wheat which is boosting
prices for those crops Biofuels are also raising
meat and dairy prices by pushing up the price of
animal feed
39 43 20
45
1995 2005 2015 1995 2005 2015
EU cereals EU rapeseed
90
60
20
0 16 lt15 1995 2005 20151995 2005 2015
Source The German Marshall Fund of the USA
While higher food prices will beneft some
producers they negatively impact the economies
of food-importing countries Poor people who
spend a large proportion of their income on
food will suffer disproportionately compared
with the wealthy Mexico has already experienced
some of the negative consequences of the
growing US bioethanol industry In 2006
Mexicans took to the streets to protest at the
high price of tortillas (a corn bread staple) made
more expensive by demand for maize from USA
bioethanol producers
In 2007 the UN World Food Programme which
fghts famine in Africa announced that it could
no longer afford to maintain its current level of
support due to high commodity prices Its food
purchasing costs rose by almost 50 between
2002 and 2007 854 million23 people suffer from
hunger and this is increasing by an average of
4 million a year at current trends Increasing
food prices will mean that even more people will
depend on food aid
Land is a fnite resource
Some biofuels are much more land
effcient than others because of
higher feedstock yields per hectare and
more effcient production processes (see graphic
10) If we are to feed a growing population using
the fnite amount of agricultural land available
it is vital that governments choose to promote
biofuels that deliver the maximum possible
energy per hectare
First-generation biofuels
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from non-tropical
feedstocks (rape wheat and corn) are not land
effcient It would require a minimum of 26 of
the worldrsquos arable land to run just 20 of its cars
on these fuels
104 405 13 25
Bioethanol Biomass- Biomethane (wheat) to-liquid (energy crops)
1st generation biofuel 2nd generation biofuel
Source FNR
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from palm oil
and sugarcane are more land effcient but
there is limited potential to expand production
of the feedstocks without causing signifcant
environmental damage through loss of natural
forests and grasslands
Second-generation biofuels
To run 20 of the worldrsquos vehicles on second-
generation biofuels would require 7 of its
arable land The feedstocks for these fuels can
also be grown on other types of land such as
pastures and forests
Trade
Even at todayrsquos high oil prices most
biofuels cannot compete on cost with
petrol and diesel Biofuel producers
rely on government subsidies for their profts
Governments are beginning to set mandatory
targets to stimulate investment and demand
for biofuels This is further boosting the price
of agricultural commodities and contributing to
trade distortions
In Brazil a well-established biofuel industry and
low production costs means Brazilian bioethanol
is cost competitive with petrol and diesel The
EU and the USA have set trade barriers to
protect domestic biofuel industries from cheap
Brazilian bioethanol imports This is encouraging
the development of less cost-effective and less
sustainable biofuels This makes it more diffcult
for those developing countries that are better
suited to biofuels production to compete on
world markets
Many governments have proposed mandatory
biofuel targets that exceed their countryrsquos
production and land capacity In future this
could make these countries dependent on
foreign imports which will undermine their
energy security Commodity prices will continue
to rise as competition increases for limited
global supplies
[10] biofuelS eNeRGY DeliveRY(x 1000 litres of diesel equivalent per hectare)
Source FNR
1013 25
4054
Biomethane(energy crops)
Biomass- to-liquid
Bioethanol(wheat)
Biodiesel(rapeseed oil)
Bioethanol(sugar cane)
100
[5] co2 ReDucTioN of biofuelS coMPAReD WiTh foSSil fuelS ()
Source IEA Energy Technology Perspective 2006
Bioethanol (corn) USA
Bioethanol (wheat)
EU
Biomass to liquid(2nd generation)
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Brazil
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
EU
Fossil fuel
lt10 40-6087
100
1030
[7] RAiNfoReST DefoReSTATioN iMPAcTScarbon storage and co2 emissions per hectare in Se Asia
Sources see back page
RainforestCarbon stored above ground
230tonnescarbon
DeforestationCarbon released as CO2 due to clearing
and burning
830tonnes
CO2
Palm plantationsStores only 20 of carbon per hectare compared to rain-
forest (equivalent to 165 tonnes CO2)
48tonnescarbon
[6] biofuelS SAviNGSbiofuels cost per tonne GhG reduction ($ per tonne co2 equivalent)
Source IEA Biofuels for transportation An international perspective 2004
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Bioethanol (corn)
Bioethanol (grain)
Bioethanol (cellulose)
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
Biodiesel (biomass)
0 200 400 600 800-50
2002Post 2010
[8] PRoJecTeD GRoWTh iN fooD coNSuMPTioN
Source OECD-FAO 2006
-
-
-
-
-
-
2004 2009 2014 2019
100
110
120
130
140
150 Oil and oilseed meals
SugarMeat
CerealsDairy
1st generation biofuel 2nd generation biofuel
90
2015
2015
[9] PRoPoRTioN of cRoP uSeD foR biofuelS ()
Source The German Marshall Fund of the USA
Brazil sugarcane USA corn
EU rapeseedEU cereals
1995 1995
19951995
2005 2005
20052005
2015
2015
39
45
lt15
20
60
43
16
70
20
0
50
The unilever positionUnilever supports sustainable biofuels that deliver social and environmental benefts across their entire lifecycle
Unilever supports renewable energy
initiatives that deliver benefts on a lifecycle
basis helping to combat climate change and
reduce dependency on fossil fuels Around
17 of the energy we use for our operations
comes from renewable sources
Why the issue matters to Unilever
Two-thirds of the raw materials we use
come from agriculture These materials are
essential to our business and Unilever has
a clear interest in how they are grown and
in securing future supplies That is why
we have worked to improve the social and
environmental standards of agriculture
for more than a decade Our sustainable
agriculture programmes include palm oil
oilseed rape sunfowers spinach tomatoes
and tea We are also a member of several
sustainability initiatives including the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil
Demand for biofuels feedstock has already
reduced the availability of raw materials and
driven up prices We are concerned that
increased demand will destabilise world
food supply and undermine sustainable
agriculture Use of vegetable oils such as
rapeseed oil for biofuels could also create
shortages driving consumers to less healthy
animal fats
Lifecycle analysis
Unilever believes that individual biofuels
should be examined carefully to ensure
that the unintended environmental
(deforestation and biodiversity loss) and
socio-economic (food security) consequences
do not undermine the positive impacts
Biofuels must also be evaluated across their
lifecycle to achieve genuine greenhouse gas
(GHG) reductions
Biomass is a valuable resource Using it
to generate heat and electricity is a more
effcient and cost-effective way of reducing
CO2 emissions than using it to make
transport fuels24 New vehicle technologies
such as electric and hybrid and more
effcient engines offer signifcant scope
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
from transport
First-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that some frst-generation
biofuels are neither environmentally effcient
nor cost-effective ways to reduce emissions
Many studies have shown that several frst-
generation biofuels have poor performance
with regard to reducing GHG emissions and
dependency on fossil fuels Some even cause
more GHG emissions than the fossil fuels
they replace25
We are concerned that the use of valuable
food crops for energy purposes will increase
pressure on ecosystems and biodiversity
Deforestation particularly to make way for
palm oil and soya beans could lead to the
devastation of the last remaining rainforests
in Borneo and the Amazon region
Second-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that the development
of second-generation biofuels that donrsquot
compete with food crops and have low
carbon emissions is essential The mainstream
market introduction of second-generation
biofuels would provide a strong incentive
for the application of renewable energy
technologies while minimising the negative
repercussions on food markets and food
security Unilever believes there is a strong
case for government and business investment
in new technologies and further research on
the sustainable use of biomass Support for
second-generation biofuels could be
accelerated through
n RampD facilitation and technology transfer
n Tax exemption andor subsidies
n Phasing out support for poor performing
frst-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels should be
required to achieve at least 50 GHG
savings compared to fossil fuels
Assessing sustainability
We believe governments worldwide have
the responsibility to subject their biofuel
policies to a full impact assessment These
assessments should cover environmental
social and economic impacts from the
regions of production to the end use
Policies which aim to reduce GHG emissions
should contain full lifecycle assessments for
individual biofuels This should ensure that
change in land use is included in the carbon
balance We propose that government
targets should be based on CO2 reductions
rather than volume as well as on availability
of feedstocks
Sustainability standards
Unilever believes sustainability criteria should
be introduced for the use of biomass within
energy programmes These should include
criteria at the production level as well as
criteria at a macro-level such as overall GHG
balance and energy effciency food security
and the protection of biodiversity and
ecosystems The use of biomass for energy
should not be stimulated by government
programmes without the application of
transparent sustainability criteria Proceeding
without these safeguards will risk unintended
consequences that could result in worse
climate change impacts natural habitat loss
and disruption of staple food supplies
unintended consequencesBiofuels could help boost rural development while reducing CO2 emissions and reliance on crude oil But if biofuel strategies are not fully evaluated they could do more harm than good stimulating poor performing biofuels and stifing innovation
CO2 performance
Biofuels can help fght climate change
but CO2 savings vary signifcantly
between fuels (see graphic 5)
This is because the amount of energy needed
to produce different feedstocks (type of
crop and where it is grown) and to process
them into fuels varies considerably For
example using US corn it takes 06ndash08
litres of fossil fuels to produce an amount of
bioethanol equivalent to 1 litre of mineral
oil whereas it takes less than 01 litres of
fossil fuels to produce the same amount of
bioethanol using Brazilian sugarcane15
1500 and 4600 litres of water18 to produce
just one litre of bioethanol There are already
water shortages in many regions and population
growth and climate change will further increase
competition for clean water and increase its cost
Land-use and food availability
The worldrsquos population is rapidly
increasing and is expected to exceed
9 billion19 by 2050 To feed this
growing population will require 50 more food
in the next 20 years
While higher food prices will beneft some
producers they negatively impact the economies
of food-importing countries Poor people who
spend a large proportion of their income on
food will suffer disproportionately compared
with the wealthy Mexico has already experienced
some of the negative consequences of the
growing US bioethanol industry In 2006
Mexicans took to the streets to protest at the
high price of tortillas (a corn bread staple) made
more expensive by demand for maize from USA
bioethanol producers
In 2007 the UN World Food Programme which
fghts famine in Africa announced that it could
no longer afford to maintain its current level of
support due to high commodity prices Its food
purchasing costs rose by almost 50 between
2002 and 2007 854 million23 people suffer from
hunger and this is increasing by an average of
4 million a year at current trends Increasing
food prices will mean that even more people will
depend on food aid
Land is a fnite resource
Some biofuels are much more land
effcient than others because of
higher feedstock yields per hectare and
more effcient production processes (see graphic
10) If we are to feed a growing population using
the fnite amount of agricultural land available
it is vital that governments choose to promote
biofuels that deliver the maximum possible
energy per hectare
First-generation biofuels
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from non-tropical
feedstocks (rape wheat and corn) are not land
effcient It would require a minimum of 26 of
the worldrsquos arable land to run just 20 of its cars
on these fuels
Second-generation biofuels produce even
less CO2 as their feedstocks require fewer
agricultural inputs and production processes
are much more effcient
Biofuels cost more than petrol or diesel per
unit of energy because of the high cost of
feedstocks and production Using biodiesel
and bioethanol from crops grown in Europe
and the USA as a carbon reduction strategy
will cost around $200-$250 per tonne of
CO2 avoided at 2004 prices The cost of
bioethanol from sugarcane as in Brazil
can be comparable to that of fossil fuels
(see graphic 6) Bioethanol from cellulose
(a second-generation biofuel) could already
provide CO2 reductions at less than $200 a
tonne It is likely to remain expensive to
reduce CO2 using biodiesel and bioethanol
from US and European crops even after
2010 The cost of using second-generation
biofuels could come down to under $100 a
tonne with large-scale production
As more governments encourage the use of
biofuels and set mandatory targets demand
will outstrip supply leading to higher prices
for frst- and second-generation biofuels
Deforestation and land-use change
The demand for soya and palm oil
threatens rainforests in Brazil
Indonesia and Malaysia which
are being cleared for plantations These oils
are used by a number of industries but the
growth in biodiesel production is increasing
demand signifcantly
Rainforests store large amounts of carbon
above ground and in the soil which is
released when they are cleared (see
graphic 7) A much smaller amount of carbon
is absorbed by the plantations which replace
the forests This means biofuels grown in
tropical countries can contribute more to
climate change than fossil fuels when their
land-use impact is taken into account
Studies have shown that biodiesel made from
palm oil produces three16 to ten17 times more
CO2 than an equivalent amount of fossil
fuel The situation is even worse for biodiesel
made from soya as the crop yields less oil
and stores less carbon than palm plantations
Peat lands wetlands and grasslands also
release large amounts of carbon if converted
to agricultural use Most biodiesel is made
from rapeseed oil rather than palm oil and
soya bean oil But as an increasing share of
rapeseed oil is used for fuels rather than for
food more soya and palm is being planted
to compensate
Deforestation and land-use change means
that while biofuels can appear to help
governments meet their national greenhouse
gas emissions reduction targets they could in
reality be more damaging to climate change
globally when land-use impact is considered
This means that it is vital for national policies
to take into account the full life-cycle climate
impact of different biofuels
Biodiversity loss
The destruction of tropical forests
and grasslands to make way for
soya and palm plantations causes
signifcant destruction of plant and animal
species including endangered species such
as the orang-utan
Biofuel feedstocks are often grown as a
single crop over a wide area Known as
monoculture this brings high yields but
harms biodiversity These impacts can be
reduced to an extent through mixed planting
and leaving wild areas
Water scarcity
Both frst and second-generation
biofuels require large amounts of
water to grow and process the
feedstocks For example it takes between
In the past farmers have increased production
to meet growing demands But they are now
fnding it hard to keep up ndash in three of the four
years20 between 2003 and 2007 demand for
grains to feed people and livestock outstripped
supply As countries such as China and India
develop more people can afford meat and dairy
products This is driving up demand for agricultural
commodities The booming biofuels industry is
contributing further to this escalation in demand
First-generation biofuels compete with food
crops leading to rising food prices In future this
could jeopardise the worldrsquos ability to feed its
growing population Many other industries also
rely on raw materials like palm oil which are
being diverted to biofuel production
Increased demand higher prices
The biofuels industry is using an
increasing share of the worldrsquos food
crops (see graphic 9) which is driving
up prices Global food prices rose by 1021 in
2006 due to an increase in corn wheat and soya
bean oil prices Prices are predicted to rise by
20ndash5022 over the next decade (compared with
average levels over the last ten years)
Demand for biofuel feedstock increases prices
of other crops For example high demand for
corn to make bioethanol means US farmers are
producing less soya and wheat which is boosting
prices for those crops Biofuels are also raising
meat and dairy prices by pushing up the price of
animal feed
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from palm oil
and sugarcane are more land effcient but
there is limited potential to expand production
of the feedstocks without causing signifcant
environmental damage through loss of natural
forests and grasslands
Second-generation biofuels
To run 20 of the worldrsquos vehicles on second-
generation biofuels would require 7 of its
arable land The feedstocks for these fuels can
also be grown on other types of land such as
pastures and forests
Trade
Even at todayrsquos high oil prices most
biofuels cannot compete on cost with
petrol and diesel Biofuel producers
rely on government subsidies for their profts
Governments are beginning to set mandatory
targets to stimulate investment and demand
for biofuels This is further boosting the price
of agricultural commodities and contributing to
trade distortions
In Brazil a well-established biofuel industry and
low production costs means Brazilian bioethanol
is cost competitive with petrol and diesel The
EU and the USA have set trade barriers to
protect domestic biofuel industries from cheap
Brazilian bioethanol imports This is encouraging
the development of less cost-effective and less
sustainable biofuels This makes it more diffcult
for those developing countries that are better
suited to biofuels production to compete on
world markets
Many governments have proposed mandatory
biofuel targets that exceed their countryrsquos
production and land capacity In future this
could make these countries dependent on
foreign imports which will undermine their
energy security Commodity prices will continue
to rise as competition increases for limited
global supplies
[11] GlobAl iMPAcTS AND uNiNTeNDeD coNSeQueNceS
USA TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2030 30 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
11800000 tonnes
USA accounts for 15 of global biodiesel production
EU TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
730000 tonnes
Europe accounts for 85 of global biodiesel production
China TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 15 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
800000 tonnes
China has imposed a moratorium on projects making bioethanol fuel from corn and other basic food crops
USA corn wheat and soybean
Reduction in US land Bioethanol production used for food crops has pushed up corn pushes production prices sparking elsewhere potentially protests in Mexico causing deforestation
Europe doesnrsquot have enough land to meet its biofuels targets Europe rapeseed oil and wheatand will be dependent on imports
The worldrsquos poorest are already being affected by higher food prices
Brazil sugarcane and soybean
KEY
Issues with food security
Issues with GHGs
Issues with sustainability
Issues with trade
Feedstocks
Areas of tropical rainforest
Trade
Unintended consequences
Sustainability criteria
The social and environmental impacts
of biofuels vary considerably
depending on the type of feedstock
used where it is grown and the processes
needed to turn it into biofuels
Sustainability criteria are required to provide
confdence in the labelling and identifcation
of specifc types of biofuel The criteria should
Brazil TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2010 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
12900000 tonnes
cover the lifecycle CO2 emissions and impacts
on natural habitats as well as socio-economic
factors such as the availability of food for the
local population where feedstocks are produced
In 2007 the Dutch Government announced
sustainability criteria and has proposed a system
to enable traceability of feedstocks by 2020
The UK Government has proposed that 80 of
biofuels meet sustainability standards including
European demand for biodiesel feedstock
98 of Indonesiarsquos raises palm oil price natural rainforest will causing deforestation be degraded or gone by 2022
India TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 20 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
240000 tonnes
Sources FOLicht UN
CO2 reduction requirements by 2010ndash11 The
EU is developing sustainability criteria
Business is also developing sustainability
standards through initiatives such as the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (chaired by
Unilever) and the Roundtable on Sustainable
Biofuels The latter aims to launch draft
sustainability standards in early 2008
Sources FOLicht UN
[10] biofuelS eNeRGY DeliveRY(x 1000 litres of diesel equivalent per hectare)
Source FNR
1013 25
4054
Biomethane(energy crops)
Biomass- to-liquid
Bioethanol(wheat)
Biodiesel(rapeseed oil)
Bioethanol(sugar cane)
Sustainability criteria
The social and environmental impacts
of biofuels vary considerably
depending on the type of feedstock
used where it is grown and the processes
needed to turn it into biofuels
Sustainability criteria are required to provide
confdence in the labelling and identifcation
of specifc types of biofuel The criteria should
100
[5] co2 ReDucTioN of biofuelS coMPAReD WiTh foSSil fuelS ()
Source IEA Energy Technology Perspective 2006
Bioethanol (corn) USA
Bioethanol (wheat)
EU
Biomass to liquid(2nd generation)
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Brazil
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
EU
Fossil fuel
lt10 40-6087
100
1030
[7] RAiNfoReST DefoReSTATioN iMPAcTScarbon storage and co2 emissions per hectare in Se Asia
Sources see back page
RainforestCarbon stored above ground
230tonnescarbon
DeforestationCarbon released as CO2 due to clearing
and burning
830tonnes
CO2
Palm plantationsStores only 20 of carbon per hectare compared to rain-
forest (equivalent to 165 tonnes CO2)
48tonnescarbon
[6] biofuelS SAviNGSbiofuels cost per tonne GhG reduction ($ per tonne co2 equivalent)
Source IEA Biofuels for transportation An international perspective 2004
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Bioethanol (corn)
Bioethanol (grain)
Bioethanol (cellulose)
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
Biodiesel (biomass)
0 200 400 600 800-50
2002Post 2010
[8] PRoJecTeD GRoWTh iN fooD coNSuMPTioN
Source OECD-FAO 2006
-
-
-
-
-
-
2004 2009 2014 2019
100
110
120
130
140
150 Oil and oilseed meals
SugarMeat
CerealsDairy
1st generation biofuel 2nd generation biofuel
cover the lifecycle CO2 emissions and impacts
on natural habitats as well as socio-economic
factors such as the availability of food for the
local population where feedstocks are produced
In 2007 the Dutch Government announced
sustainability criteria and has proposed a system
to enable traceability of feedstocks by 2020
The UK Government has proposed that 80 of
biofuels meet sustainability standards including
CO2 reduction requirements by 2010ndash11 The
EU is developing sustainability criteria
Business is also developing sustainability
standards through initiatives such as the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (chaired by
Unilever) and the Roundtable on Sustainable
Biofuels The latter aims to launch draft
sustainability standards in early 2008
90
2015
2015
[9] PRoPoRTioN of cRoP uSeD foR biofuelS ()
Source The German Marshall Fund of the USA
Brazil sugarcane USA corn
EU rapeseedEU cereals
1995 1995
19951995
2005 2005
20052005
2015
2015
39
45
lt15
20
60
43
16
70
20
0
50USATARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2030 30 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
11800000 tonnes
USA accounts for 15 of global biodiesel production
ChinaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 15 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
800000 tonnes
China has imposed a moratorium on projects making bioethanol fuel from corn and other basic food crops
BrazilTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2010 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
12900000 tonnes
IndiaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 20 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
240000 tonnes
EUTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
730000 tonnes
Europe accounts for 85 of global biodiesel production
Reduction in US land used for food crops pushes production elsewhere potentially causing deforestation
Brazil sugarcane and soybean
European demand for biodiesel feedstock raises palm oil price causing deforestation
Europe doesnrsquot have enough land to meet its biofuels targets and will be dependent on imports
USA corn wheat and soybean
Bioethanol production has pushed up corn prices sparking protests in Mexico
The worldrsquos poorest are already being affected by higher food prices
98 of Indonesiarsquos natural rainforest will be degraded or gone by 2022
KEY
Issues with food security
Issues with GHGs
Issues with sustainability
Issues with trade
Areas of tropical rainforest
Trade
Unintended consequences
Feedstocks
Europe rapeseed oil and wheat
unintended consequencesBiofuels could help boost rural development while reducing CO2 emissions and reliance on crude oil But if biofuel strategies are not fully evaluated they could do more harm than good stimulating poor performing biofuels and stifing innovation
CO2 performance
Biofuels can help fght climate change
but CO2 savings vary signifcantly
between fuels (see graphic 5)
This is because the amount of energy needed
to produce different feedstocks (type of
crop and where it is grown) and to process
them into fuels varies considerably For
example using US corn it takes 06ndash08
litres of fossil fuels to produce an amount of
bioethanol equivalent to 1 litre of mineral
oil whereas it takes less than 01 litres of
fossil fuels to produce the same amount of
bioethanol using Brazilian sugarcane15
1500 and 4600 litres of water18 to produce
just one litre of bioethanol There are already
water shortages in many regions and population
growth and climate change will further increase
competition for clean water and increase its cost
Land-use and food availability
The worldrsquos population is rapidly
increasing and is expected to exceed
9 billion19 by 2050 To feed this
growing population will require 50 more food
in the next 20 years
While higher food prices will beneft some
producers they negatively impact the economies
of food-importing countries Poor people who
spend a large proportion of their income on
food will suffer disproportionately compared
with the wealthy Mexico has already experienced
some of the negative consequences of the
growing US bioethanol industry In 2006
Mexicans took to the streets to protest at the
high price of tortillas (a corn bread staple) made
more expensive by demand for maize from USA
bioethanol producers
In 2007 the UN World Food Programme which
fghts famine in Africa announced that it could
no longer afford to maintain its current level of
support due to high commodity prices Its food
purchasing costs rose by almost 50 between
2002 and 2007 854 million23 people suffer from
hunger and this is increasing by an average of
4 million a year at current trends Increasing
food prices will mean that even more people will
depend on food aid
Land is a fnite resource
Some biofuels are much more land
effcient than others because of
higher feedstock yields per hectare and
more effcient production processes (see graphic
10) If we are to feed a growing population using
the fnite amount of agricultural land available
it is vital that governments choose to promote
biofuels that deliver the maximum possible
energy per hectare
First-generation biofuels
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from non-tropical
feedstocks (rape wheat and corn) are not land
effcient It would require a minimum of 26 of
the worldrsquos arable land to run just 20 of its cars
on these fuels
[11] GlobAl iMPAcTS AND uNiNTeNDeD coNSeQueNceS
Second-generation biofuels produce even
less CO2 as their feedstocks require fewer
agricultural inputs and production processes
are much more effcient
Biofuels cost more than petrol or diesel per
unit of energy because of the high cost of
feedstocks and production Using biodiesel
and bioethanol from crops grown in Europe
and the USA as a carbon reduction strategy
will cost around $200-$250 per tonne of
CO2 avoided at 2004 prices The cost of
bioethanol from sugarcane as in Brazil
can be comparable to that of fossil fuels
(see graphic 6) Bioethanol from cellulose
(a second-generation biofuel) could already
provide CO2 reductions at less than $200 a
tonne It is likely to remain expensive to
reduce CO2 using biodiesel and bioethanol
from US and European crops even after
2010 The cost of using second-generation
biofuels could come down to under $100 a
tonne with large-scale production
As more governments encourage the use of
biofuels and set mandatory targets demand
will outstrip supply leading to higher prices
for frst- and second-generation biofuels
Deforestation and land-use change
The demand for soya and palm oil
threatens rainforests in Brazil
Indonesia and Malaysia which
are being cleared for plantations These oils
are used by a number of industries but the
growth in biodiesel production is increasing
demand signifcantly
Rainforests store large amounts of carbon
above ground and in the soil which is
released when they are cleared (see
graphic 7) A much smaller amount of carbon
is absorbed by the plantations which replace
the forests This means biofuels grown in
tropical countries can contribute more to
climate change than fossil fuels when their
land-use impact is taken into account
Studies have shown that biodiesel made from
palm oil produces three16 to ten17 times more
CO2 than an equivalent amount of fossil
fuel The situation is even worse for biodiesel
made from soya as the crop yields less oil
and stores less carbon than palm plantations
Peat lands wetlands and grasslands also
release large amounts of carbon if converted
to agricultural use Most biodiesel is made
from rapeseed oil rather than palm oil and
soya bean oil But as an increasing share of
rapeseed oil is used for fuels rather than for
food more soya and palm is being planted
to compensate
Deforestation and land-use change means
that while biofuels can appear to help
governments meet their national greenhouse
gas emissions reduction targets they could in
reality be more damaging to climate change
globally when land-use impact is considered
This means that it is vital for national policies
to take into account the full life-cycle climate
impact of different biofuels
Biodiversity loss
The destruction of tropical forests
and grasslands to make way for
soya and palm plantations causes
signifcant destruction of plant and animal
species including endangered species such
as the orang-utan
Biofuel feedstocks are often grown as a
single crop over a wide area Known as
monoculture this brings high yields but
harms biodiversity These impacts can be
reduced to an extent through mixed planting
and leaving wild areas
Water scarcity
Both frst and second-generation
biofuels require large amounts of
water to grow and process the
feedstocks For example it takes between
In the past farmers have increased production
to meet growing demands But they are now
fnding it hard to keep up ndash in three of the four
years20 between 2003 and 2007 demand for
grains to feed people and livestock outstripped
supply As countries such as China and India
develop more people can afford meat and dairy
products This is driving up demand for agricultural
commodities The booming biofuels industry is
contributing further to this escalation in demand
First-generation biofuels compete with food
crops leading to rising food prices In future this
could jeopardise the worldrsquos ability to feed its
growing population Many other industries also
rely on raw materials like palm oil which are
being diverted to biofuel production
Increased demand higher prices
The biofuels industry is using an
increasing share of the worldrsquos food
crops (see graphic 9) which is driving
up prices Global food prices rose by 1021 in
2006 due to an increase in corn wheat and soya
bean oil prices Prices are predicted to rise by
20ndash5022 over the next decade (compared with
average levels over the last ten years)
Demand for biofuel feedstock increases prices
of other crops For example high demand for
corn to make bioethanol means US farmers are
producing less soya and wheat which is boosting
prices for those crops Biofuels are also raising
meat and dairy prices by pushing up the price of
animal feed
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from palm oil
and sugarcane are more land effcient but
there is limited potential to expand production
of the feedstocks without causing signifcant
environmental damage through loss of natural
forests and grasslands
Second-generation biofuels
To run 20 of the worldrsquos vehicles on second-
generation biofuels would require 7 of its
arable land The feedstocks for these fuels can
also be grown on other types of land such as
pastures and forests
Trade
Even at todayrsquos high oil prices most
biofuels cannot compete on cost with
petrol and diesel Biofuel producers
rely on government subsidies for their profts
Governments are beginning to set mandatory
targets to stimulate investment and demand
for biofuels This is further boosting the price
of agricultural commodities and contributing to
trade distortions
In Brazil a well-established biofuel industry and
low production costs means Brazilian bioethanol
is cost competitive with petrol and diesel The
EU and the USA have set trade barriers to
protect domestic biofuel industries from cheap
Brazilian bioethanol imports This is encouraging
the development of less cost-effective and less
sustainable biofuels This makes it more diffcult
for those developing countries that are better
suited to biofuels production to compete on
world markets
Many governments have proposed mandatory
biofuel targets that exceed their countryrsquos
production and land capacity In future this
could make these countries dependent on
foreign imports which will undermine their
energy security Commodity prices will continue
to rise as competition increases for limited
global supplies
The unilever position Unilever supports sustainable biofuels that deliver social and environmental benefts across their entire lifecycle
Unilever supports renewable energy
initiatives that deliver benefts on a lifecycle
basis helping to combat climate change and
reduce dependency on fossil fuels Around
17 of the energy we use for our operations
comes from renewable sources
Why the issue matters to Unilever
Two-thirds of the raw materials we use
come from agriculture These materials are
essential to our business and Unilever has
a clear interest in how they are grown and
in securing future supplies That is why
we have worked to improve the social and
environmental standards of agriculture
for more than a decade Our sustainable
agriculture programmes include palm oil
oilseed rape sunfowers spinach tomatoes
and tea We are also a member of several
sustainability initiatives including the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil
Demand for biofuels feedstock has already
reduced the availability of raw materials and
driven up prices We are concerned that
increased demand will destabilise world
food supply and undermine sustainable
agriculture Use of vegetable oils such as
rapeseed oil for biofuels could also create
shortages driving consumers to less healthy
animal fats
Lifecycle analysis
Unilever believes that individual biofuels
should be examined carefully to ensure
that the unintended environmental
(deforestation and biodiversity loss) and
socio-economic (food security) consequences
do not undermine the positive impacts
Biofuels must also be evaluated across their
lifecycle to achieve genuine greenhouse gas
(GHG) reductions
Biomass is a valuable resource Using it
to generate heat and electricity is a more
effcient and cost-effective way of reducing
CO2 emissions than using it to make
transport fuels24 New vehicle technologies
such as electric and hybrid and more
effcient engines offer signifcant scope
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
from transport
First-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that some frst-generation
biofuels are neither environmentally effcient
nor cost-effective ways to reduce emissions
Many studies have shown that several frst-
generation biofuels have poor performance
with regard to reducing GHG emissions and
dependency on fossil fuels Some even cause
more GHG emissions than the fossil fuels
they replace25
We are concerned that the use of valuable
food crops for energy purposes will increase
pressure on ecosystems and biodiversity
Deforestation particularly to make way for
palm oil and soya beans could lead to the
devastation of the last remaining rainforests
in Borneo and the Amazon region
Second-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that the development
of second-generation biofuels that donrsquot
compete with food crops and have low
carbon emissions is essential The mainstream
market introduction of second-generation
biofuels would provide a strong incentive
for the application of renewable energy
technologies while minimising the negative
repercussions on food markets and food
security Unilever believes there is a strong
case for government and business investment
in new technologies and further research on
the sustainable use of biomass Support for
second-generation biofuels could be
accelerated through
n RampD facilitation and technology transfer
n Tax exemption andor subsidies
n Phasing out support for poor performing
frst-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels should be
required to achieve at least 50 GHG
savings compared to fossil fuels
Assessing sustainability
We believe governments worldwide have
the responsibility to subject their biofuel
policies to a full impact assessment These
assessments should cover environmental
social and economic impacts from the
regions of production to the end use
Policies which aim to reduce GHG emissions
should contain full lifecycle assessments for
individual biofuels This should ensure that
change in land use is included in the carbon
balance We propose that government
targets should be based on CO2 reductions
rather than volume as well as on availability
of feedstocks
Sustainability standards
Unilever believes sustainability criteria should
be introduced for the use of biomass within
energy programmes These should include
criteria at the production level as well as
criteria at a macro-level such as overall GHG
balance and energy effciency food security
and the protection of biodiversity and
ecosystems The use of biomass for energy
should not be stimulated by government
programmes without the application of
transparent sustainability criteria Proceeding
without these safeguards will risk unintended
consequences that could result in worse
climate change impacts natural habitat loss
and disruption of staple food supplies
Whatrsquos driving biofuels growthBiofuels have existed for over a hundred years ndash Henry Ford designed his Model T to run on bioethanol ndash but they have mostly been unable to compete with fuels derived from crude oil New government energy policies subsidies and tax exemptions are now stimulating biofuels production which has doubled since 1998 and is predicted to double again by 20115 There are a number of reasons why governments favour biofuels
Combating climate change
Transport is a signifcant contributor to
climate change accounting for around
25 of man-made greenhouse gas
emissions globally
In principle the use of biofuels can help
reduce transportrsquos impact on climate
change This is because the plants used
to make the fuels absorb carbon dioxide
(CO2) ndash the most important greenhouse
gas ndash as they grow The gas is later
released when the biofuels are used
However biofuels are not carbon neutral
It takes energy to grow and harvest the
plants and to process and distribute
biofuels The entire process emits CO2
and fertilisers emit nitrous oxide (N2O) a
powerful greenhouse gas (see graphic 4)
The amount of energy needed to make
different biofuels varies considerably This
makes it vital to take the entire production
process into account when assessing
the potential of biofuels to help reduce
transport CO2 emissions Read more about
CO2 performance overleaf
Technology and innovation
Unlike other renewable fuels such
as hydrogen the infrastructure to
manufacture and distribute biofuels is in
place today Biofuels are also compatible
with todayrsquos vehicles and power
generation technology
In 2006 $26 billion6 was invested in
biofuels The International Energy Agency
(IEA)7 estimates that between 2005 and
2030 it will cost $160 billion to expand
biofuel production to fuel 4 of global
road transport and $225 billion to fuel 7
Energy security
Global energy demands are increasing
rapidly The worldrsquos population has
doubled in the last four decades ndash to
around 66 billion in 2004 ndash and is
expected to exceed 9 billion8 by 2050
Rapid development particularly in China
and India is increasing wealth and this is
boosting demands for energy and transport
There were around 900 million vehicles
on the road in 2000 but this is forecast to
increase to over 2 billion by 20509
Fossil fuels (oil coal and gas) are
expected to be the dominant source of
energy for the foreseeable future But
production has already peaked in many
major oil-producing countries and new
developments are increasingly located in
environmentally challenging and politically
unstable parts of the world This has
resulted in high oil prices which the IEA
predicts will remain between $48ndash$62
until 203010 Some analysts predict 2030
prices could be as high as $10011 High oil
prices hit developing countries the hardest
ndash some spend six times as much on fuel as
on health12
Biofuels are seen by governments as a
secure source of energy and a way to
reduce reliance on imported fossil fuels
Brazil has replaced around 1513 of its
petrol consumption with bioethanol
according to the IEA The Washington Post puts this fgure at 4014
Rural development
Biofuels can help boost farm incomes
Globalisation and the industrialisation of
farming have reduced the price farmers
get for their produce Demand for the
agricultural commodities used to make
biofuels is reversing this trend In the
developed world this is creating jobs
and reducing the need for subsidies
for farmers
[4] biofuel co2 lifecYcle iMPAcTS
CO2
Fertilising
Harvesting Transporting
Processing
Transporting
Use
Growing
CO2
CO2 CO2
CO2
CO2
CO2
Energy
EnergyEnergy
EnergyEnergy
Energy
N2O
[2] fiRST-GeNeRATioN biofuelS bioDieSel Production process
Soybean oil
Diesel mix
Palm oil Rapeseed oil
Methyl esters
Transesterifcation
[1] fiRST-GeNeRATioN biofuelS bioeThANol Production process
Sugarcane
Sugar
Petrol mix
Corn
Starch
bioethanol
fermentation
biomass to liquid production process
Petrol mixDiesel mix
celluose ethanol production process
[3] SecoND-GeNeRATioN biofuelS
biochemical treatment
enzymatic hydrolysis
Sugar
fermentation
cellulose ethanol
Thermochemical treatmentgasifcation
Synthesis gas
Synthesis
hydrocarbons
Biomass including agricultural
residues
Special crops such as fast growing woody plants
Changes in government energy policies
are accelerating demand for liquid or
gaseous biofuels used in transport (see
facing page)
Transport biofuels can be distributed using
existing technology and used in todayrsquos
vehicles without modifcation when mixed
with petrol or diesel or in adapted vehicles
if used neat or in high concentrations
There are many different biofuels made
using a variety of production processes
and feedstocks There are two categories
First-generation biofuels made from
food crops These are widely used today
Second-generation biofuels made from
non-food crops These are in development
and will not be widely commercially
available for at least fve to ten years
First-generation biofuels
First-generation biofuels are made from
food crops including wheat rapeseed
corn soya and sugarcane
There are two main types of frst-generation
biofuels now in commercial use
Bioethanol Bioethanol is made by fermenting sugars
produced by plants (similar to beer and
wine production) Bioethanol accounts for
around 851 of global biofuel production
and is mainly produced from corn and
sugarcane
Bioethanol is usually blended with petrol ndash
todayrsquos fuel standards allow bioethanol to
be mixed with petrol in volumes up to 5
in Europe and 10 in the USA Bioethanol
can be used at higher concentrations
or neat For example in Brazil all petrol
contains at least 20ndash25 bioethanol and
many vehicles have been adapted to run
on 100 bioethanol
Bioethanol has a lower energy density
than petrol This makes it about 402 less
fuel effcient
defo
rest
atio
n la
nd-u
se ch
ange
hig
h fo
od p
rices
land
-use
cha
e h
igh
food
pric
es f
ood
shor
tage
s la
nd a
vaila
bilit
y
food
shortag
es land ava
ilability
trad
e dist
or
tions
rura
l dev
elop
men
t en
ergy
secu
rity
CO2 savi
ngs sust
ainab
ilit
y sta
ndar
ds
trad
e di
stor
tions
wat
er sh
orta
ges
biodi
versi
ty lo
ss
ener
gy s
ecur
ity C
O2
sav
ngs
sus
tain
abilit
y st
anda
rds
inno
vatio
ns
What are biofuelsBiofuels are made by processing food crops and other plants animal products or wastes (collectively known as biomass) These can be burnt to generate electricity or heat and are increasingly being used as transport fuels
PRoMoTiNG SuSTAiNAble biofuelS
Biodiesel Biodiesel is a blend of methyl esters (a type
of biofuel) and diesel Methyl esters are
produced by a chemical reaction between a
vegetable oil and an alcohol They are made
from rapeseed (primarily) palm oil and
soybean oil and account for around 153
of global biofuel production
Biodiesel is the most commonly used
biofuel in Europe where fuel standards
allow 5 blends USA fuel standards allow
blends of up to 204 Specially designed
vehicles can run on 100 biodiesel
Second-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels are made from
non-food feedstocks such as wood and
straw The production process uses the
whole plant rather than just the plant
starches or sugars that are used to make
frst-generation biofuels This means waste
materials from agricultural and forestry can
be used as feedstocks
There are a number of second-generation
biofuels under development These include
cellulose ethanol which is produced from
straw using enzymes and can be mixed
with petrol biomass-to-liquid fuel which
is made from wood feedstocks and can be
blended with diesel and biomethane a
gas made from organic material (such as
manure and straw) which can be used in
modifed petrol and diesel engines
Sources of information 1 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
2 International Energy Agency httpieaorgtextbasework2004 eswg21_NCVpdf
3 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
4 httpwwwbiodieselorgresourcesfuelfactsheetsstandards_ and_warrantiesshtm
5 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
6 United Nations Environment Programme Global Trends in Sustainable Energy Investment 2007
7 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
8 United Nations World Population to 2300 2004
9 World Business Council for Sustainable Development Energy amp Climate Change Facts and Trends to 2050 2004
10 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
11 Energy Information Administration Annual Energy Outlook 2007
12 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
13 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
14 Washington Post 200807
15 International Energy Agency Biofuels for Transport ndash An International Perspective 2004
16 Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ 2006
17 Delft Hydraulics
18 Based on Food and Agriculture Organization data available at wwwwaterfootprintorg
19 United Nations World Population to 2300 2004
20 Economist 23607
21 International Monetary Fund World Economic Report April 2007
22 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Food and Agriculture Organization Agricultural Outlook 2007-2016
23 Food and Agriculture Organization State of Food Insecurity in the World 2006
24 International Energy Agency Biofuels For Transport An International Perspective 2004
25 Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ (2006) and Delft Hydraulics
Rainforest Deforestation Impacts [7] graphic
Journal of Cleaner Production 2006 Palm Oil and the Emission of Carbon-Based Greenhouse Gases Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ
Journal of Tropical Forest Science 2005 An Assessment of Changes in Biomass Carbon Stocks in Tree Crops and Forests in Malaysia Henson IE
Oil World Annual 2007 ISTA Mielke GmbH
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Volume 2 Energy 2006
Writing and consultancy Context
Design and production Red Letter Design
Illustrations (Graphics 4 and 7) KJA-artistscom
Printing Scanplus (on paper made from responsibly managed forests)
Unilever NV Weena 455 PO Box 760 3000 DK Rotterdam The Netherlands T +31 (0)10 217 4000 F +31 (0)10 217 4798
Commercial Register Rotterdam Number 24051830
Unilever PLC PO Box 68 100 Victoria Embankment London EC4P 4BQ United Kingdom T +44 (0)20 7822 5252 F +44 (0)20 7822 5951
Unilever PLC registered offce Unilever PLC Port Sunlight Wirral Merseyside CH62 4ZD United Kingdom
Registered in England and Wales Company Number 41424
wwwunilevercom
Whatrsquos driving biofuels growthBiofuels have existed for over a hundred years ndash Henry Ford designed his Model T to run on bioethanol ndash but they have mostly been unable to compete with fuels derived from crude oil New government energy policies subsidies and tax exemptions are now stimulating biofuels production which has doubled since 1998 and is predicted to double again by 20115 There are a number of reasons why governments favour biofuels
Combating climate change
Transport is a signifcant contributor to
climate change accounting for around
25 of man-made greenhouse gas
emissions globally
In principle the use of biofuels can help
reduce transportrsquos impact on climate
change This is because the plants used
to make the fuels absorb carbon dioxide
(CO2) ndash the most important greenhouse
gas ndash as they grow The gas is later
released when the biofuels are used
However biofuels are not carbon neutral
It takes energy to grow and harvest the
plants and to process and distribute
biofuels The entire process emits CO2
and fertilisers emit nitrous oxide (N2O) a
powerful greenhouse gas (see graphic 4)
The amount of energy needed to make
different biofuels varies considerably This
makes it vital to take the entire production
process into account when assessing
the potential of biofuels to help reduce
transport CO2 emissions Read more about
CO2 performance overleaf
Technology and innovation
Unlike other renewable fuels such
as hydrogen the infrastructure to
manufacture and distribute biofuels is in
place today Biofuels are also compatible
with todayrsquos vehicles and power
generation technology
In 2006 $26 billion6 was invested in
biofuels The International Energy Agency
(IEA)7 estimates that between 2005 and
2030 it will cost $160 billion to expand
biofuel production to fuel 4 of global
road transport and $225 billion to fuel 7
Energy security
Global energy demands are increasing
rapidly The worldrsquos population has
doubled in the last four decades ndash to
around 66 billion in 2004 ndash and is
expected to exceed 9 billion8 by 2050
Rapid development particularly in China
and India is increasing wealth and this is
boosting demands for energy and transport
There were around 900 million vehicles
on the road in 2000 but this is forecast to
increase to over 2 billion by 20509
Fossil fuels (oil coal and gas) are
expected to be the dominant source of
energy for the foreseeable future But
production has already peaked in many
major oil-producing countries and new
developments are increasingly located in
environmentally challenging and politically
unstable parts of the world This has
resulted in high oil prices which the IEA
predicts will remain between $48ndash$62
until 203010 Some analysts predict 2030
prices could be as high as $10011 High oil
prices hit developing countries the hardest
ndash some spend six times as much on fuel as
on health12
Biofuels are seen by governments as a
secure source of energy and a way to
reduce reliance on imported fossil fuels
Brazil has replaced around 1513 of its
petrol consumption with bioethanol
according to the IEA The Washington Post puts this fgure at 4014
Rural development
Biofuels can help boost farm incomes
Globalisation and the industrialisation of
farming have reduced the price farmers
get for their produce Demand for the
agricultural commodities used to make
biofuels is reversing this trend In the
developed world this is creating jobs
and reducing the need for subsidies
for farmers
[4] biofuel co2 lifecYcle iMPAcTS
CO2
Fertilising
Harvesting Transporting
Processing
Transporting
Use
Growing
CO2
CO2 CO2
CO2
CO2
CO2
Energy
EnergyEnergy
EnergyEnergy
Energy
N2O
defo
rest
atio
n la
nd-u
se ch
ange
hig
h fo
od p
rices
land
-use
cha
e h
igh
food
pric
es f
ood
shor
tage
s la
nd a
vaila
bilit
y
food
shortag
es land ava
ilability
trad
e dist
or
tions
rura
l dev
elop
men
t en
ergy
secu
rity
CO2 savi
ngs sust
ainab
ilit
y sta
ndar
ds
trad
e di
stor
tions
wat
er sh
orta
ges
biodi
versi
ty lo
ss
ener
gy s
ecur
ity C
O2
sav
ngs
sus
tain
abilit
y st
anda
rds
inno
vatio
ns
Sources of information1 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
2 International Energy Agency httpieaorgtextbasework2004eswg21_NCVpdf
3 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
4 httpwwwbiodieselorgresourcesfuelfactsheetsstandards_and_warrantiesshtm
5 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
6 United Nations Environment Programme Global Trends in Sustainable Energy Investment 2007
7 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
8 United Nations World Population to 2300 2004
9 World Business Council for Sustainable Development Energy amp Climate Change Facts and Trends to 2050 2004
10 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
11 Energy Information Administration Annual Energy Outlook 2007
12 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
13 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
14 Washington Post 200807
15 International Energy Agency Biofuels for Transport ndash An International Perspective 2004
16 Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ 2006
17 Delft Hydraulics
18 Based on Food and Agriculture Organization data available at wwwwaterfootprintorg
19 United Nations World Population to 2300 2004
20 Economist 23607
21 International Monetary Fund World Economic Report April 2007
22 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and DevelopmentFood and Agriculture Organization Agricultural Outlook 2007-2016
23 Food and Agriculture Organization State of Food Insecurity in the World 2006
24 International Energy Agency Biofuels For Transport An International Perspective 2004
25 Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ (2006) and Delft Hydraulics
Rainforest Deforestation Impacts [7] graphic
Journal of Cleaner Production 2006 Palm Oil and the Emission of Carbon-Based Greenhouse Gases Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ
Journal of Tropical Forest Science 2005 An Assessment of Changes in Biomass Carbon Stocks in Tree Crops and Forests in Malaysia Henson IE
Oil World Annual 2007 ISTA Mielke GmbH
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Volume 2 Energy 2006
Unilever NVWeena 455 PO Box 7603000 DK RotterdamThe NetherlandsT +31 (0)10 217 4000F +31 (0)10 217 4798
Commercial Register RotterdamNumber 24051830
Unilever PLCPO Box 68100 Victoria Embankment London EC4P 4BQ United KingdomT +44 (0)20 7822 5252F +44 (0)20 7822 5951
Unilever PLC registered offceUnilever PLCPort SunlightWirralMerseyside CH62 4ZDUnited Kingdom
Registered in England and WalesCompany Number 41424
wwwunilevercom
Writing and consultancy Context
Design and production Red Letter Design
Illustrations (Graphics 4 and 7) KJA-artistscom
Printing Scanplus (on paper made from responsibly managed forests)
PRoMoTiNG SuSTAiNAble biofuelS
What are biofuels Biofuels are made by processing food crops and other plants animal products or wastes (collectively known as biomass) These can be burnt to generate electricity or heat and are increasingly being used as transport fuels
Changes in government energy policies
are accelerating demand for liquid or
gaseous biofuels used in transport (see
facing page)
Transport biofuels can be distributed using
existing technology and used in todayrsquos
vehicles without modifcation when mixed
with petrol or diesel or in adapted vehicles
if used neat or in high concentrations
There are many different biofuels made
using a variety of production processes
and feedstocks There are two categories
First-generation biofuels made from
food crops These are widely used today
Second-generation biofuels made from
non-food crops These are in development
and will not be widely commercially
available for at least fve to ten years
First-generation biofuels
First-generation biofuels are made from
food crops including wheat rapeseed
corn soya and sugarcane
There are two main types of frst-generation
biofuels now in commercial use
Bioethanol Bioethanol is made by fermenting sugars
produced by plants (similar to beer and
wine production) Bioethanol accounts for
around 851 of global biofuel production
and is mainly produced from corn and
sugarcane
Bioethanol is usually blended with petrol ndash
todayrsquos fuel standards allow bioethanol to
be mixed with petrol in volumes up to 5
in Europe and 10 in the USA Bioethanol
can be used at higher concentrations
or neat For example in Brazil all petrol
contains at least 20ndash25 bioethanol and
many vehicles have been adapted to run
on 100 bioethanol
Bioethanol has a lower energy density
than petrol This makes it about 402 less
fuel effcient
[1] fiRST-GeNeRATioN biofuelS bioeThANol Production process
Sugarcane Corn
Starch
Sugar
fermentation
bioethanol
Petrol mix
Biodiesel Biodiesel is a blend of methyl esters (a type
of biofuel) and diesel Methyl esters are
produced by a chemical reaction between a
vegetable oil and an alcohol They are made
from rapeseed (primarily) palm oil and
soybean oil and account for around 153
of global biofuel production
Biodiesel is the most commonly used
biofuel in Europe where fuel standards
allow 5 blends USA fuel standards allow
[2] fiRST-GeNeRATioN biofuelS bioDieSel Production process
Soybean oil Palm oil Rapeseed oil
Transesterifcation
Methyl esters
blends of up to 204 Specially designed
vehicles can run on 100 biodiesel
Second-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels are made from
non-food feedstocks such as wood and
straw The production process uses the
whole plant rather than just the plant
starches or sugars that are used to make
frst-generation biofuels This means waste
materials from agricultural and forestry can
be used as feedstocks
[3] SecoND-GeNeRATioN biofuelS
biomass to liquid celluose ethanol production process production process
Biomass including Special crops such agricultural as fast growing
residues woody plants
Thermochemical biochemical treatment treatment gasifcation enzymatic hydrolysis
Synthesis gas Sugar
Synthesis fermentation
hydrocarbons cellulose ethanol
Diesel mix Petrol mix
There are a number of second-generation
biofuels under development These include
cellulose ethanol which is produced from
straw using enzymes and can be mixed
with petrol biomass-to-liquid fuel which
is made from wood feedstocks and can be
blended with diesel and biomethane a
gas made from organic material (such as
manure and straw) which can be used in
modifed petrol and diesel engines
Diesel mix
[2] fiRST-GeNeRATioN biofuelS bioDieSel Production process
Soybean oil
Diesel mix
Palm oil Rapeseed oil
Methyl esters
Transesterifcation
[1] fiRST-GeNeRATioN biofuelS bioeThANol Production process
Sugarcane
Sugar
Petrol mix
Corn
Starch
bioethanol
fermentation
biomass to liquid production process
Petrol mixDiesel mix
celluose ethanol production process
[3] SecoND-GeNeRATioN biofuelS
biochemical treatment
enzymatic hydrolysis
Sugar
fermentation
cellulose ethanol
Thermochemical treatmentgasifcation
Synthesis gas
Synthesis
hydrocarbons
Biomass including agricultural
residues
Special crops such as fast growing woody plants
Changes in government energy policies
are accelerating demand for liquid or
gaseous biofuels used in transport (see
facing page)
Transport biofuels can be distributed using
existing technology and used in todayrsquos
vehicles without modifcation when mixed
with petrol or diesel or in adapted vehicles
if used neat or in high concentrations
There are many different biofuels made
using a variety of production processes
and feedstocks There are two categories
First-generation biofuels made from
food crops These are widely used today
Second-generation biofuels made from
non-food crops These are in development
and will not be widely commercially
available for at least fve to ten years
First-generation biofuels
First-generation biofuels are made from
food crops including wheat rapeseed
corn soya and sugarcane
There are two main types of frst-generation
biofuels now in commercial use
Bioethanol Bioethanol is made by fermenting sugars
produced by plants (similar to beer and
wine production) Bioethanol accounts for
around 851 of global biofuel production
and is mainly produced from corn and
sugarcane
Bioethanol is usually blended with petrol ndash
todayrsquos fuel standards allow bioethanol to
be mixed with petrol in volumes up to 5
in Europe and 10 in the USA Bioethanol
can be used at higher concentrations
or neat For example in Brazil all petrol
contains at least 20ndash25 bioethanol and
many vehicles have been adapted to run
on 100 bioethanol
Bioethanol has a lower energy density
than petrol This makes it about 402 less
fuel effcient
defo
rest
atio
n la
nd-u
se ch
ange
hig
h fo
od p
rices
land
-use
cha
e h
igh
food
pric
es f
ood
shor
tage
s la
nd a
vaila
bilit
y
food
shortag
es land ava
ilability
trad
e dist
or
tions
rura
l dev
elop
men
t en
ergy
secu
rity
CO2 savi
ngs sust
ainab
ilit
y sta
ndar
ds
trad
e di
stor
tions
wat
er sh
orta
ges
biodi
versi
ty lo
ss
ener
gy s
ecur
ity C
O2
sav
ngs
sus
tain
abilit
y st
anda
rds
inno
vatio
ns
What are biofuelsBiofuels are made by processing food crops and other plants animal products or wastes (collectively known as biomass) These can be burnt to generate electricity or heat and are increasingly being used as transport fuels
Sources of information1 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
2 International Energy Agency httpieaorgtextbasework2004eswg21_NCVpdf
3 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
4 httpwwwbiodieselorgresourcesfuelfactsheetsstandards_and_warrantiesshtm
5 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
6 United Nations Environment Programme Global Trends in Sustainable Energy Investment 2007
7 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
8 United Nations World Population to 2300 2004
9 World Business Council for Sustainable Development Energy amp Climate Change Facts and Trends to 2050 2004
10 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
11 Energy Information Administration Annual Energy Outlook 2007
12 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
13 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
14 Washington Post 200807
15 International Energy Agency Biofuels for Transport ndash An International Perspective 2004
16 Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ 2006
17 Delft Hydraulics
18 Based on Food and Agriculture Organization data available at wwwwaterfootprintorg
19 United Nations World Population to 2300 2004
20 Economist 23607
21 International Monetary Fund World Economic Report April 2007
22 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and DevelopmentFood and Agriculture Organization Agricultural Outlook 2007-2016
23 Food and Agriculture Organization State of Food Insecurity in the World 2006
24 International Energy Agency Biofuels For Transport An International Perspective 2004
25 Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ (2006) and Delft Hydraulics
Rainforest Deforestation Impacts [7] graphic
Journal of Cleaner Production 2006 Palm Oil and the Emission of Carbon-Based Greenhouse Gases Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ
Journal of Tropical Forest Science 2005 An Assessment of Changes in Biomass Carbon Stocks in Tree Crops and Forests in Malaysia Henson IE
Oil World Annual 2007 ISTA Mielke GmbH
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Volume 2 Energy 2006
Unilever NVWeena 455 PO Box 7603000 DK RotterdamThe NetherlandsT +31 (0)10 217 4000F +31 (0)10 217 4798
Commercial Register RotterdamNumber 24051830
Unilever PLCPO Box 68100 Victoria Embankment London EC4P 4BQ United KingdomT +44 (0)20 7822 5252F +44 (0)20 7822 5951
Unilever PLC registered offceUnilever PLCPort SunlightWirralMerseyside CH62 4ZDUnited Kingdom
Registered in England and WalesCompany Number 41424
wwwunilevercom
Writing and consultancy Context
Design and production Red Letter Design
Illustrations (Graphics 4 and 7) KJA-artistscom
Printing Scanplus (on paper made from responsibly managed forests)
PRoMoTiNG SuSTAiNAble biofuelS
Biodiesel Biodiesel is a blend of methyl esters (a type
of biofuel) and diesel Methyl esters are
produced by a chemical reaction between a
vegetable oil and an alcohol They are made
from rapeseed (primarily) palm oil and
soybean oil and account for around 153
of global biofuel production
Biodiesel is the most commonly used
biofuel in Europe where fuel standards
allow 5 blends USA fuel standards allow
blends of up to 204 Specially designed
vehicles can run on 100 biodiesel
Second-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels are made from
non-food feedstocks such as wood and
straw The production process uses the
whole plant rather than just the plant
starches or sugars that are used to make
frst-generation biofuels This means waste
materials from agricultural and forestry can
be used as feedstocks
There are a number of second-generation
biofuels under development These include
cellulose ethanol which is produced from
straw using enzymes and can be mixed
with petrol biomass-to-liquid fuel which
is made from wood feedstocks and can be
blended with diesel and biomethane a
gas made from organic material (such as
manure and straw) which can be used in
modifed petrol and diesel engines
Whatrsquos driving biofuels growth Biofuels have existed for over a hundred years ndash Henry Ford designed his Model T to run on bioethanol ndash but they have mostly been unable to compete with fuels derived from crude oil New government energy policies subsidies and tax exemptions are now stimulating biofuels production which has doubled since 1998 and is predicted to double again by 20115 There are a number of reasons why governments favour biofuels
[4] biofuel co2 lifecYcle iMPAcTS
Fertilising
CO2
CO2
N2O Growing
Energy
Combating climate change
Transport is a signifcant contributor to
climate change accounting for around
25 of man-made greenhouse gas
emissions globally
In principle the use of biofuels can help
reduce transportrsquos impact on climate
change This is because the plants used
to make the fuels absorb carbon dioxide
(CO2) ndash the most important greenhouse
gas ndash as they grow The gas is later
released when the biofuels are used
However biofuels are not carbon neutral
It takes energy to grow and harvest the
plants and to process and distribute
biofuels The entire process emits CO2
and fertilisers emit nitrous oxide (N2O) a
powerful greenhouse gas (see graphic 4)
The amount of energy needed to make
different biofuels varies considerably This
makes it vital to take the entire production
process into account when assessing
the potential of biofuels to help reduce
transport CO2 emissions Read more about
CO2 performance overleaf
Technology and innovation
Unlike other renewable fuels such
as hydrogen the infrastructure to
Processing
Harvesting Transporting
CO2
CO2 CO2
Energy
Energy Energy
manufacture and distribute biofuels is in
place today Biofuels are also compatible
with todayrsquos vehicles and power
generation technology
In 2006 $26 billion6 was invested in
biofuels The International Energy Agency
(IEA)7 estimates that between 2005 and
2030 it will cost $160 billion to expand
biofuel production to fuel 4 of global
road transport and $225 billion to fuel 7
Energy security
Global energy demands are increasing
rapidly The worldrsquos population has
doubled in the last four decades ndash to
around 66 billion in 2004 ndash and is
expected to exceed 9 billion8 by 2050
Rapid development particularly in China
and India is increasing wealth and this is
boosting demands for energy and transport
There were around 900 million vehicles
on the road in 2000 but this is forecast to
increase to over 2 billion by 20509
Fossil fuels (oil coal and gas) are
expected to be the dominant source of
energy for the foreseeable future But
production has already peaked in many
major oil-producing countries and new
developments are increasingly located in
environmentally challenging and politically
Transporting
CO2 Use
CO2
Energy
Energy
unstable parts of the world This has
resulted in high oil prices which the IEA
predicts will remain between $48ndash$62
until 203010 Some analysts predict 2030
prices could be as high as $10011 High oil
prices hit developing countries the hardest
ndash some spend six times as much on fuel as
on health12
Biofuels are seen by governments as a
secure source of energy and a way to
reduce reliance on imported fossil fuels
Brazil has replaced around 1513 of its
petrol consumption with bioethanol
according to the IEA The Washington Post puts this fgure at 4014
Rural development
Biofuels can help boost farm incomes
Globalisation and the industrialisation of
farming have reduced the price farmers
get for their produce Demand for the
agricultural commodities used to make
biofuels is reversing this trend In the
developed world this is creating jobs
and reducing the need for subsidies
for farmers
Sources FOLicht UN
[10] biofuelS eNeRGY DeliveRY(x 1000 litres of diesel equivalent per hectare)
Source FNR
1013 25
4054
Biomethane(energy crops)
Biomass- to-liquid
Bioethanol(wheat)
Biodiesel(rapeseed oil)
Bioethanol(sugar cane)
Sustainability criteria
The social and environmental impacts
of biofuels vary considerably
depending on the type of feedstock
used where it is grown and the processes
needed to turn it into biofuels
Sustainability criteria are required to provide
confdence in the labelling and identifcation
of specifc types of biofuel The criteria should
[8] PRoJecTeD GRoWTh iN fooD coNSuMPTioN
Source OECD-FAO 2006
-
-
-
-
-
-
2004 2009 2014 2019
100
110
120
130
140
150 Oil and oilseed meals
SugarMeat
CerealsDairy
1st generation biofuel 2nd generation biofuel
cover the lifecycle CO2 emissions and impacts
on natural habitats as well as socio-economic
factors such as the availability of food for the
local population where feedstocks are produced
In 2007 the Dutch Government announced
sustainability criteria and has proposed a system
to enable traceability of feedstocks by 2020
The UK Government has proposed that 80 of
biofuels meet sustainability standards including
CO2 reduction requirements by 2010ndash11 The
EU is developing sustainability criteria
Business is also developing sustainability
standards through initiatives such as the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (chaired by
Unilever) and the Roundtable on Sustainable
Biofuels The latter aims to launch draft
sustainability standards in early 2008
90
2015
2015
[9] PRoPoRTioN of cRoP uSeD foR biofuelS ()
Source The German Marshall Fund of the USA
Brazil sugarcane USA corn
EU rapeseedEU cereals
1995 1995
19951995
2005 2005
20052005
2015
2015
39
45
lt15
20
60
43
16
70
20
0
50USATARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2030 30 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
11800000 tonnes
USA accounts for 15 of global biodiesel production
ChinaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 15 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
800000 tonnes
China has imposed a moratorium on projects making bioethanol fuel from corn and other basic food crops
BrazilTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2010 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
12900000 tonnes
IndiaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 20 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
240000 tonnes
EUTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
730000 tonnes
Europe accounts for 85 of global biodiesel production
Reduction in US land used for food crops pushes production elsewhere potentially causing deforestation
Brazil sugarcane and soybean
European demand for biodiesel feedstock raises palm oil price causing deforestation
Europe doesnrsquot have enough land to meet its biofuels targets and will be dependent on imports
USA corn wheat and soybean
Bioethanol production has pushed up corn prices sparking protests in Mexico
The worldrsquos poorest are already being affected by higher food prices
98 of Indonesiarsquos natural rainforest will be degraded or gone by 2022
KEY
Issues with food security
Issues with GHGs
Issues with sustainability
Issues with trade
Areas of tropical rainforest
Trade
Unintended consequences
Feedstocks
Europe rapeseed oil and wheat
The unilever positionUnilever supports sustainable biofuels that deliver social and environmental benefts across their entire lifecycle
Unilever supports renewable energy
initiatives that deliver benefts on a lifecycle
basis helping to combat climate change and
reduce dependency on fossil fuels Around
17 of the energy we use for our operations
comes from renewable sources
Why the issue matters to Unilever
Two-thirds of the raw materials we use
come from agriculture These materials are
essential to our business and Unilever has
a clear interest in how they are grown and
in securing future supplies That is why
we have worked to improve the social and
environmental standards of agriculture
for more than a decade Our sustainable
agriculture programmes include palm oil
oilseed rape sunfowers spinach tomatoes
and tea We are also a member of several
sustainability initiatives including the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil
Demand for biofuels feedstock has already
reduced the availability of raw materials and
driven up prices We are concerned that
increased demand will destabilise world
food supply and undermine sustainable
agriculture Use of vegetable oils such as
rapeseed oil for biofuels could also create
shortages driving consumers to less healthy
animal fats
Lifecycle analysis
Unilever believes that individual biofuels
should be examined carefully to ensure
that the unintended environmental
(deforestation and biodiversity loss) and
socio-economic (food security) consequences
do not undermine the positive impacts
Biofuels must also be evaluated across their
lifecycle to achieve genuine greenhouse gas
(GHG) reductions
Biomass is a valuable resource Using it
to generate heat and electricity is a more
effcient and cost-effective way of reducing
CO2 emissions than using it to make
transport fuels24 New vehicle technologies
such as electric and hybrid and more
effcient engines offer signifcant scope
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
from transport
First-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that some frst-generation
biofuels are neither environmentally effcient
nor cost-effective ways to reduce emissions
Many studies have shown that several frst-
generation biofuels have poor performance
with regard to reducing GHG emissions and
dependency on fossil fuels Some even cause
more GHG emissions than the fossil fuels
they replace25
We are concerned that the use of valuable
food crops for energy purposes will increase
pressure on ecosystems and biodiversity
Deforestation particularly to make way for
palm oil and soya beans could lead to the
devastation of the last remaining rainforests
in Borneo and the Amazon region
Second-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that the development
of second-generation biofuels that donrsquot
compete with food crops and have low
carbon emissions is essential The mainstream
market introduction of second-generation
biofuels would provide a strong incentive
for the application of renewable energy
technologies while minimising the negative
repercussions on food markets and food
security Unilever believes there is a strong
case for government and business investment
in new technologies and further research on
the sustainable use of biomass Support for
second-generation biofuels could be
accelerated through
n RampD facilitation and technology transfer
n Tax exemption andor subsidies
n Phasing out support for poor performing
frst-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels should be
required to achieve at least 50 GHG
savings compared to fossil fuels
Assessing sustainability
We believe governments worldwide have
the responsibility to subject their biofuel
policies to a full impact assessment These
assessments should cover environmental
social and economic impacts from the
regions of production to the end use
Policies which aim to reduce GHG emissions
should contain full lifecycle assessments for
individual biofuels This should ensure that
change in land use is included in the carbon
balance We propose that government
targets should be based on CO2 reductions
rather than volume as well as on availability
of feedstocks
Sustainability standards
Unilever believes sustainability criteria should
be introduced for the use of biomass within
energy programmes These should include
criteria at the production level as well as
criteria at a macro-level such as overall GHG
balance and energy effciency food security
and the protection of biodiversity and
ecosystems The use of biomass for energy
should not be stimulated by government
programmes without the application of
transparent sustainability criteria Proceeding
without these safeguards will risk unintended
consequences that could result in worse
climate change impacts natural habitat loss
and disruption of staple food supplies
1500 and 4600 litres of water18 to produce
just one litre of bioethanol There are already
water shortages in many regions and population
growth and climate change will further increase
competition for clean water and increase its cost
Land-use and food availability
The worldrsquos population is rapidly
increasing and is expected to exceed
9 billion19 by 2050 To feed this
growing population will require 50 more food
in the next 20 years
While higher food prices will beneft some
producers they negatively impact the economies
of food-importing countries Poor people who
spend a large proportion of their income on
food will suffer disproportionately compared
with the wealthy Mexico has already experienced
some of the negative consequences of the
growing US bioethanol industry In 2006
Mexicans took to the streets to protest at the
high price of tortillas (a corn bread staple) made
more expensive by demand for maize from USA
bioethanol producers
In 2007 the UN World Food Programme which
fghts famine in Africa announced that it could
no longer afford to maintain its current level of
support due to high commodity prices Its food
purchasing costs rose by almost 50 between
2002 and 2007 854 million23 people suffer from
hunger and this is increasing by an average of
4 million a year at current trends Increasing
food prices will mean that even more people will
depend on food aid
Land is a fnite resource
Some biofuels are much more land
effcient than others because of
higher feedstock yields per hectare and
more effcient production processes (see graphic
10) If we are to feed a growing population using
the fnite amount of agricultural land available
it is vital that governments choose to promote
biofuels that deliver the maximum possible
energy per hectare
First-generation biofuels
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from non-tropical
feedstocks (rape wheat and corn) are not land
effcient It would require a minimum of 26 of
the worldrsquos arable land to run just 20 of its cars
on these fuels
[11] GlobAl iMPAcTS AND uNiNTeNDeD coNSeQueNceS
In the past farmers have increased production
to meet growing demands But they are now
fnding it hard to keep up ndash in three of the four
years20 between 2003 and 2007 demand for
grains to feed people and livestock outstripped
supply As countries such as China and India
develop more people can afford meat and dairy
products This is driving up demand for agricultural
commodities The booming biofuels industry is
contributing further to this escalation in demand
First-generation biofuels compete with food
crops leading to rising food prices In future this
could jeopardise the worldrsquos ability to feed its
growing population Many other industries also
rely on raw materials like palm oil which are
being diverted to biofuel production
Increased demand higher prices
The biofuels industry is using an
increasing share of the worldrsquos food
crops (see graphic 9) which is driving
up prices Global food prices rose by 1021 in
2006 due to an increase in corn wheat and soya
bean oil prices Prices are predicted to rise by
20ndash5022 over the next decade (compared with
average levels over the last ten years)
Demand for biofuel feedstock increases prices
of other crops For example high demand for
corn to make bioethanol means US farmers are
producing less soya and wheat which is boosting
prices for those crops Biofuels are also raising
meat and dairy prices by pushing up the price of
animal feed
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from palm oil
and sugarcane are more land effcient but
there is limited potential to expand production
of the feedstocks without causing signifcant
environmental damage through loss of natural
forests and grasslands
Second-generation biofuels
To run 20 of the worldrsquos vehicles on second-
generation biofuels would require 7 of its
arable land The feedstocks for these fuels can
also be grown on other types of land such as
pastures and forests
Trade
Even at todayrsquos high oil prices most
biofuels cannot compete on cost with
petrol and diesel Biofuel producers
rely on government subsidies for their profts
Governments are beginning to set mandatory
targets to stimulate investment and demand
for biofuels This is further boosting the price
of agricultural commodities and contributing to
trade distortions
In Brazil a well-established biofuel industry and
low production costs means Brazilian bioethanol
is cost competitive with petrol and diesel The
EU and the USA have set trade barriers to
protect domestic biofuel industries from cheap
Brazilian bioethanol imports This is encouraging
the development of less cost-effective and less
sustainable biofuels This makes it more diffcult
for those developing countries that are better
suited to biofuels production to compete on
world markets
Many governments have proposed mandatory
biofuel targets that exceed their countryrsquos
production and land capacity In future this
could make these countries dependent on
foreign imports which will undermine their
energy security Commodity prices will continue
to rise as competition increases for limited
global supplies
unintended consequences Biofuels could help boost rural development while reducing CO2 emissions and reliance on crude oil But if biofuel strategies are not fully evaluated they could do more harm than good stimulating poor performing biofuels and stifing innovation
CO2 performance
Biofuels can help fght climate change
but CO2 savings vary signifcantly
between fuels (see graphic 5)
This is because the amount of energy needed
to produce different feedstocks (type of
crop and where it is grown) and to process
them into fuels varies considerably For
example using US corn it takes 06ndash08
litres of fossil fuels to produce an amount of
bioethanol equivalent to 1 litre of mineral
oil whereas it takes less than 01 litres of
fossil fuels to produce the same amount of
bioethanol using Brazilian sugarcane15
[5] co2 ReDucTioN of biofuelS coMPAReD WiTh foSSil fuelS ()
Biomass to liquid Bioethanol Fossil (2nd generation) (corn) fuel
Bioethanol USA
(wheat) EU 100
87 100
lt10 30
40-60
10
Bioethanol Biodiesel (sugarcane) (rapeseed)
Brazil EU
Source IEA Energy Technology Perspective 2006
Second-generation biofuels produce even
less CO2 as their feedstocks require fewer
agricultural inputs and production processes
are much more effcient
Biofuels cost more than petrol or diesel per
unit of energy because of the high cost of
feedstocks and production Using biodiesel
and bioethanol from crops grown in Europe
[6] biofuelS SAviNGS biofuels cost per tonne GhG reduction ($ per tonne co2 equivalent)
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Bioethanol (corn)
Bioethanol (grain)
Bioethanol (cellulose) 2002
Biodiesel Post 2010 (rapeseed)
Biodiesel (biomass)
-50 0 200 400 600 800
Source IEA Biofuels for transportation An international perspective 2004
and the USA as a carbon reduction strategy
will cost around $200-$250 per tonne of
CO2 avoided at 2004 prices The cost of
bioethanol from sugarcane as in Brazil
can be comparable to that of fossil fuels
(see graphic 6) Bioethanol from cellulose
(a second-generation biofuel) could already
provide CO2 reductions at less than $200 a
tonne It is likely to remain expensive to
reduce CO2 using biodiesel and bioethanol
from US and European crops even after
2010 The cost of using second-generation
biofuels could come down to under $100 a
tonne with large-scale production
As more governments encourage the use of
biofuels and set mandatory targets demand
will outstrip supply leading to higher prices
for frst- and second-generation biofuels
Deforestation and land-use change
The demand for soya and palm oil
threatens rainforests in Brazil
Indonesia and Malaysia which
are being cleared for plantations These oils
are used by a number of industries but the
growth in biodiesel production is increasing
demand signifcantly
[7] RAiNfoReST DefoReSTATioN iMPAcTS carbon storage and co2 emissions per hectare in Se Asia
230 830 48 tonnes tonnes tonnes carbon CO2 carbon
Rainforest Deforestation Palm plantations Carbon stored Carbon released as Stores only 20 of above ground CO2 due to clearing carbon per hectare
and burning compared to rain-forest (equivalent to
165 tonnes CO2)
Sources see back page
Rainforests store large amounts of carbon
above ground and in the soil which is
released when they are cleared (see
graphic 7) A much smaller amount of carbon
is absorbed by the plantations which replace
the forests This means biofuels grown in
tropical countries can contribute more to
climate change than fossil fuels when their
land-use impact is taken into account
Studies have shown that biodiesel made from
palm oil produces three16 to ten17 times more
CO2 than an equivalent amount of fossil
fuel The situation is even worse for biodiesel
made from soya as the crop yields less oil
and stores less carbon than palm plantations
Peat lands wetlands and grasslands also
release large amounts of carbon if converted
to agricultural use Most biodiesel is made
from rapeseed oil rather than palm oil and
soya bean oil But as an increasing share of
rapeseed oil is used for fuels rather than for
food more soya and palm is being planted
to compensate
Deforestation and land-use change means
that while biofuels can appear to help
governments meet their national greenhouse
gas emissions reduction targets they could in
reality be more damaging to climate change
globally when land-use impact is considered
This means that it is vital for national policies
to take into account the full life-cycle climate
impact of different biofuels
Biodiversity loss
The destruction of tropical forests
and grasslands to make way for
soya and palm plantations causes
signifcant destruction of plant and animal
species including endangered species such
as the orang-utan
Biofuel feedstocks are often grown as a
single crop over a wide area Known as
monoculture this brings high yields but
harms biodiversity These impacts can be
reduced to an extent through mixed planting
and leaving wild areas
Water scarcity
Both frst and second-generation
biofuels require large amounts of
water to grow and process the
feedstocks For example it takes between
Sources FOLicht UN
Sustainability criteria
The social and environmental impacts
of biofuels vary considerably
depending on the type of feedstock
used where it is grown and the processes
needed to turn it into biofuels
Sustainability criteria are required to provide
confdence in the labelling and identifcation
of specifc types of biofuel The criteria should
100
[5] co2 ReDucTioN of biofuelS coMPAReD WiTh foSSil fuelS ()
Source IEA Energy Technology Perspective 2006
Bioethanol (corn) USA
Bioethanol (wheat)
EU
Biomass to liquid(2nd generation)
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Brazil
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
EU
Fossil fuel
lt10 40-6087
100
1030
[7] RAiNfoReST DefoReSTATioN iMPAcTScarbon storage and co2 emissions per hectare in Se Asia
Sources see back page
RainforestCarbon stored above ground
230tonnescarbon
DeforestationCarbon released as CO2 due to clearing
and burning
830tonnes
CO2
Palm plantationsStores only 20 of carbon per hectare compared to rain-
forest (equivalent to 165 tonnes CO2)
48tonnescarbon
[6] biofuelS SAviNGSbiofuels cost per tonne GhG reduction ($ per tonne co2 equivalent)
Source IEA Biofuels for transportation An international perspective 2004
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Bioethanol (corn)
Bioethanol (grain)
Bioethanol (cellulose)
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
Biodiesel (biomass)
0 200 400 600 800-50
2002Post 2010
cover the lifecycle CO2 emissions and impacts
on natural habitats as well as socio-economic
factors such as the availability of food for the
local population where feedstocks are produced
In 2007 the Dutch Government announced
sustainability criteria and has proposed a system
to enable traceability of feedstocks by 2020
The UK Government has proposed that 80 of
biofuels meet sustainability standards including
CO2 reduction requirements by 2010ndash11 The
EU is developing sustainability criteria
Business is also developing sustainability
standards through initiatives such as the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (chaired by
Unilever) and the Roundtable on Sustainable
Biofuels The latter aims to launch draft
sustainability standards in early 2008
USATARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2030 30 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
11800000 tonnes
USA accounts for 15 of global biodiesel production
ChinaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 15 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
800000 tonnes
China has imposed a moratorium on projects making bioethanol fuel from corn and other basic food crops
BrazilTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2010 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
12900000 tonnes
IndiaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 20 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
240000 tonnes
EUTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
730000 tonnes
Europe accounts for 85 of global biodiesel production
Reduction in US land used for food crops pushes production elsewhere potentially causing deforestation
Brazil sugarcane and soybean
European demand for biodiesel feedstock raises palm oil price causing deforestation
Europe doesnrsquot have enough land to meet its biofuels targets and will be dependent on imports
USA corn wheat and soybean
Bioethanol production has pushed up corn prices sparking protests in Mexico
The worldrsquos poorest are already being affected by higher food prices
98 of Indonesiarsquos natural rainforest will be degraded or gone by 2022
KEY
Issues with food security
Issues with GHGs
Issues with sustainability
Issues with trade
Areas of tropical rainforest
Trade
Unintended consequences
Feedstocks
Europe rapeseed oil and wheat
The unilever positionUnilever supports sustainable biofuels that deliver social and environmental benefts across their entire lifecycle
Unilever supports renewable energy
initiatives that deliver benefts on a lifecycle
basis helping to combat climate change and
reduce dependency on fossil fuels Around
17 of the energy we use for our operations
comes from renewable sources
Why the issue matters to Unilever
Two-thirds of the raw materials we use
come from agriculture These materials are
essential to our business and Unilever has
a clear interest in how they are grown and
in securing future supplies That is why
we have worked to improve the social and
environmental standards of agriculture
for more than a decade Our sustainable
agriculture programmes include palm oil
oilseed rape sunfowers spinach tomatoes
and tea We are also a member of several
sustainability initiatives including the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil
Demand for biofuels feedstock has already
reduced the availability of raw materials and
driven up prices We are concerned that
increased demand will destabilise world
food supply and undermine sustainable
agriculture Use of vegetable oils such as
rapeseed oil for biofuels could also create
shortages driving consumers to less healthy
animal fats
Lifecycle analysis
Unilever believes that individual biofuels
should be examined carefully to ensure
that the unintended environmental
(deforestation and biodiversity loss) and
socio-economic (food security) consequences
do not undermine the positive impacts
Biofuels must also be evaluated across their
lifecycle to achieve genuine greenhouse gas
(GHG) reductions
Biomass is a valuable resource Using it
to generate heat and electricity is a more
effcient and cost-effective way of reducing
CO2 emissions than using it to make
transport fuels24 New vehicle technologies
such as electric and hybrid and more
effcient engines offer signifcant scope
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
from transport
First-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that some frst-generation
biofuels are neither environmentally effcient
nor cost-effective ways to reduce emissions
Many studies have shown that several frst-
generation biofuels have poor performance
with regard to reducing GHG emissions and
dependency on fossil fuels Some even cause
more GHG emissions than the fossil fuels
they replace25
We are concerned that the use of valuable
food crops for energy purposes will increase
pressure on ecosystems and biodiversity
Deforestation particularly to make way for
palm oil and soya beans could lead to the
devastation of the last remaining rainforests
in Borneo and the Amazon region
Second-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that the development
of second-generation biofuels that donrsquot
compete with food crops and have low
carbon emissions is essential The mainstream
market introduction of second-generation
biofuels would provide a strong incentive
for the application of renewable energy
technologies while minimising the negative
repercussions on food markets and food
security Unilever believes there is a strong
case for government and business investment
in new technologies and further research on
the sustainable use of biomass Support for
second-generation biofuels could be
accelerated through
n RampD facilitation and technology transfer
n Tax exemption andor subsidies
n Phasing out support for poor performing
frst-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels should be
required to achieve at least 50 GHG
savings compared to fossil fuels
Assessing sustainability
We believe governments worldwide have
the responsibility to subject their biofuel
policies to a full impact assessment These
assessments should cover environmental
social and economic impacts from the
regions of production to the end use
Policies which aim to reduce GHG emissions
should contain full lifecycle assessments for
individual biofuels This should ensure that
change in land use is included in the carbon
balance We propose that government
targets should be based on CO2 reductions
rather than volume as well as on availability
of feedstocks
Sustainability standards
Unilever believes sustainability criteria should
be introduced for the use of biomass within
energy programmes These should include
criteria at the production level as well as
criteria at a macro-level such as overall GHG
balance and energy effciency food security
and the protection of biodiversity and
ecosystems The use of biomass for energy
should not be stimulated by government
programmes without the application of
transparent sustainability criteria Proceeding
without these safeguards will risk unintended
consequences that could result in worse
climate change impacts natural habitat loss
and disruption of staple food supplies
unintended consequencesBiofuels could help boost rural development while reducing CO2 emissions and reliance on crude oil But if biofuel strategies are not fully evaluated they could do more harm than good stimulating poor performing biofuels and stifing innovation
CO2 performance
Biofuels can help fght climate change
but CO2 savings vary signifcantly
between fuels (see graphic 5)
This is because the amount of energy needed
to produce different feedstocks (type of
crop and where it is grown) and to process
them into fuels varies considerably For
example using US corn it takes 06ndash08
litres of fossil fuels to produce an amount of
bioethanol equivalent to 1 litre of mineral
oil whereas it takes less than 01 litres of
fossil fuels to produce the same amount of
bioethanol using Brazilian sugarcane15
[11] GlobAl iMPAcTS AND uNiNTeNDeD coNSeQueNceS
Second-generation biofuels produce even
less CO2 as their feedstocks require fewer
agricultural inputs and production processes
are much more effcient
Biofuels cost more than petrol or diesel per
unit of energy because of the high cost of
feedstocks and production Using biodiesel
and bioethanol from crops grown in Europe
and the USA as a carbon reduction strategy
will cost around $200-$250 per tonne of
CO2 avoided at 2004 prices The cost of
bioethanol from sugarcane as in Brazil
can be comparable to that of fossil fuels
(see graphic 6) Bioethanol from cellulose
(a second-generation biofuel) could already
provide CO2 reductions at less than $200 a
tonne It is likely to remain expensive to
reduce CO2 using biodiesel and bioethanol
from US and European crops even after
2010 The cost of using second-generation
biofuels could come down to under $100 a
tonne with large-scale production
As more governments encourage the use of
biofuels and set mandatory targets demand
will outstrip supply leading to higher prices
for frst- and second-generation biofuels
Deforestation and land-use change
The demand for soya and palm oil
threatens rainforests in Brazil
Indonesia and Malaysia which
are being cleared for plantations These oils
are used by a number of industries but the
growth in biodiesel production is increasing
demand signifcantly
Rainforests store large amounts of carbon
above ground and in the soil which is
released when they are cleared (see
graphic 7) A much smaller amount of carbon
is absorbed by the plantations which replace
the forests This means biofuels grown in
tropical countries can contribute more to
climate change than fossil fuels when their
land-use impact is taken into account
Studies have shown that biodiesel made from
palm oil produces three16 to ten17 times more
CO2 than an equivalent amount of fossil
fuel The situation is even worse for biodiesel
made from soya as the crop yields less oil
and stores less carbon than palm plantations
Peat lands wetlands and grasslands also
release large amounts of carbon if converted
to agricultural use Most biodiesel is made
from rapeseed oil rather than palm oil and
soya bean oil But as an increasing share of
rapeseed oil is used for fuels rather than for
food more soya and palm is being planted
to compensate
Deforestation and land-use change means
that while biofuels can appear to help
governments meet their national greenhouse
gas emissions reduction targets they could in
reality be more damaging to climate change
globally when land-use impact is considered
This means that it is vital for national policies
to take into account the full life-cycle climate
impact of different biofuels
Biodiversity loss
The destruction of tropical forests
and grasslands to make way for
soya and palm plantations causes
signifcant destruction of plant and animal
species including endangered species such
as the orang-utan
Biofuel feedstocks are often grown as a
single crop over a wide area Known as
monoculture this brings high yields but
harms biodiversity These impacts can be
reduced to an extent through mixed planting
and leaving wild areas
Water scarcity
Both frst and second-generation
biofuels require large amounts of
water to grow and process the
feedstocks For example it takes between
1500 and 4600 litres of water18 to produce [9] PRoPoRTioN of cRoP uSeD foR biofuelS () [10] biofuelS eNeRGY DeliveRY just one litre of bioethanol There are already
Brazil sugarcane USA corn (x 1000 litres of diesel equivalent per hectare)
water shortages in many regions and population Biodiesel Bioethanol
growth and climate change will further increase (rapeseed oil) (sugar cane)
competition for clean water and increase its cost 70 50
Land-use and food availability
The worldrsquos population is rapidly
increasing and is expected to exceed
9 billion19 by 2050 To feed this
growing population will require 50 more food
in the next 20 years
[8] PRoJecTeD GRoWTh iN fooD coNSuMPTioN
Oil and oilseed meals
150 -
140 -Sugar Meat
130 -Cereals Dairy
120 -
110 -
100 -
2004 2009 2014 2019
Source OECD-FAO 2006
In the past farmers have increased production
to meet growing demands But they are now
fnding it hard to keep up ndash in three of the four
years20 between 2003 and 2007 demand for
grains to feed people and livestock outstripped
supply As countries such as China and India
develop more people can afford meat and dairy
products This is driving up demand for agricultural
commodities The booming biofuels industry is
contributing further to this escalation in demand
First-generation biofuels compete with food
crops leading to rising food prices In future this
could jeopardise the worldrsquos ability to feed its
growing population Many other industries also
rely on raw materials like palm oil which are
being diverted to biofuel production
Increased demand higher prices
The biofuels industry is using an
increasing share of the worldrsquos food
crops (see graphic 9) which is driving
up prices Global food prices rose by 1021 in
2006 due to an increase in corn wheat and soya
bean oil prices Prices are predicted to rise by
20ndash5022 over the next decade (compared with
average levels over the last ten years)
Demand for biofuel feedstock increases prices
of other crops For example high demand for
corn to make bioethanol means US farmers are
producing less soya and wheat which is boosting
prices for those crops Biofuels are also raising
meat and dairy prices by pushing up the price of
animal feed
39 43 20
45
1995 2005 2015 1995 2005 2015
EU cereals EU rapeseed
90
60
20
0 16 lt15 1995 2005 20151995 2005 2015
Source The German Marshall Fund of the USA
While higher food prices will beneft some
producers they negatively impact the economies
of food-importing countries Poor people who
spend a large proportion of their income on
food will suffer disproportionately compared
with the wealthy Mexico has already experienced
some of the negative consequences of the
growing US bioethanol industry In 2006
Mexicans took to the streets to protest at the
high price of tortillas (a corn bread staple) made
more expensive by demand for maize from USA
bioethanol producers
In 2007 the UN World Food Programme which
fghts famine in Africa announced that it could
no longer afford to maintain its current level of
support due to high commodity prices Its food
purchasing costs rose by almost 50 between
2002 and 2007 854 million23 people suffer from
hunger and this is increasing by an average of
4 million a year at current trends Increasing
food prices will mean that even more people will
depend on food aid
Land is a fnite resource
Some biofuels are much more land
effcient than others because of
higher feedstock yields per hectare and
more effcient production processes (see graphic
10) If we are to feed a growing population using
the fnite amount of agricultural land available
it is vital that governments choose to promote
biofuels that deliver the maximum possible
energy per hectare
First-generation biofuels
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from non-tropical
feedstocks (rape wheat and corn) are not land
effcient It would require a minimum of 26 of
the worldrsquos arable land to run just 20 of its cars
on these fuels
104 405 13 25
Bioethanol Biomass- Biomethane (wheat) to-liquid (energy crops)
1st generation biofuel 2nd generation biofuel
Source FNR
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from palm oil
and sugarcane are more land effcient but
there is limited potential to expand production
of the feedstocks without causing signifcant
environmental damage through loss of natural
forests and grasslands
Second-generation biofuels
To run 20 of the worldrsquos vehicles on second-
generation biofuels would require 7 of its
arable land The feedstocks for these fuels can
also be grown on other types of land such as
pastures and forests
Trade
Even at todayrsquos high oil prices most
biofuels cannot compete on cost with
petrol and diesel Biofuel producers
rely on government subsidies for their profts
Governments are beginning to set mandatory
targets to stimulate investment and demand
for biofuels This is further boosting the price
of agricultural commodities and contributing to
trade distortions
In Brazil a well-established biofuel industry and
low production costs means Brazilian bioethanol
is cost competitive with petrol and diesel The
EU and the USA have set trade barriers to
protect domestic biofuel industries from cheap
Brazilian bioethanol imports This is encouraging
the development of less cost-effective and less
sustainable biofuels This makes it more diffcult
for those developing countries that are better
suited to biofuels production to compete on
world markets
Many governments have proposed mandatory
biofuel targets that exceed their countryrsquos
production and land capacity In future this
could make these countries dependent on
foreign imports which will undermine their
energy security Commodity prices will continue
to rise as competition increases for limited
global supplies
[10] biofuelS eNeRGY DeliveRY(x 1000 litres of diesel equivalent per hectare)
Source FNR
1013 25
4054
Biomethane(energy crops)
Biomass- to-liquid
Bioethanol(wheat)
Biodiesel(rapeseed oil)
Bioethanol(sugar cane)
100
[5] co2 ReDucTioN of biofuelS coMPAReD WiTh foSSil fuelS ()
Source IEA Energy Technology Perspective 2006
Bioethanol (corn) USA
Bioethanol (wheat)
EU
Biomass to liquid(2nd generation)
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Brazil
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
EU
Fossil fuel
lt10 40-6087
100
1030
[7] RAiNfoReST DefoReSTATioN iMPAcTScarbon storage and co2 emissions per hectare in Se Asia
Sources see back page
RainforestCarbon stored above ground
230tonnescarbon
DeforestationCarbon released as CO2 due to clearing
and burning
830tonnes
CO2
Palm plantationsStores only 20 of carbon per hectare compared to rain-
forest (equivalent to 165 tonnes CO2)
48tonnescarbon
[6] biofuelS SAviNGSbiofuels cost per tonne GhG reduction ($ per tonne co2 equivalent)
Source IEA Biofuels for transportation An international perspective 2004
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Bioethanol (corn)
Bioethanol (grain)
Bioethanol (cellulose)
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
Biodiesel (biomass)
0 200 400 600 800-50
2002Post 2010
[8] PRoJecTeD GRoWTh iN fooD coNSuMPTioN
Source OECD-FAO 2006
-
-
-
-
-
-
2004 2009 2014 2019
100
110
120
130
140
150 Oil and oilseed meals
SugarMeat
CerealsDairy
1st generation biofuel 2nd generation biofuel
90
2015
2015
[9] PRoPoRTioN of cRoP uSeD foR biofuelS ()
Source The German Marshall Fund of the USA
Brazil sugarcane USA corn
EU rapeseedEU cereals
1995 1995
19951995
2005 2005
20052005
2015
2015
39
45
lt15
20
60
43
16
70
20
0
50
The unilever positionUnilever supports sustainable biofuels that deliver social and environmental benefts across their entire lifecycle
Unilever supports renewable energy
initiatives that deliver benefts on a lifecycle
basis helping to combat climate change and
reduce dependency on fossil fuels Around
17 of the energy we use for our operations
comes from renewable sources
Why the issue matters to Unilever
Two-thirds of the raw materials we use
come from agriculture These materials are
essential to our business and Unilever has
a clear interest in how they are grown and
in securing future supplies That is why
we have worked to improve the social and
environmental standards of agriculture
for more than a decade Our sustainable
agriculture programmes include palm oil
oilseed rape sunfowers spinach tomatoes
and tea We are also a member of several
sustainability initiatives including the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil
Demand for biofuels feedstock has already
reduced the availability of raw materials and
driven up prices We are concerned that
increased demand will destabilise world
food supply and undermine sustainable
agriculture Use of vegetable oils such as
rapeseed oil for biofuels could also create
shortages driving consumers to less healthy
animal fats
Lifecycle analysis
Unilever believes that individual biofuels
should be examined carefully to ensure
that the unintended environmental
(deforestation and biodiversity loss) and
socio-economic (food security) consequences
do not undermine the positive impacts
Biofuels must also be evaluated across their
lifecycle to achieve genuine greenhouse gas
(GHG) reductions
Biomass is a valuable resource Using it
to generate heat and electricity is a more
effcient and cost-effective way of reducing
CO2 emissions than using it to make
transport fuels24 New vehicle technologies
such as electric and hybrid and more
effcient engines offer signifcant scope
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
from transport
First-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that some frst-generation
biofuels are neither environmentally effcient
nor cost-effective ways to reduce emissions
Many studies have shown that several frst-
generation biofuels have poor performance
with regard to reducing GHG emissions and
dependency on fossil fuels Some even cause
more GHG emissions than the fossil fuels
they replace25
We are concerned that the use of valuable
food crops for energy purposes will increase
pressure on ecosystems and biodiversity
Deforestation particularly to make way for
palm oil and soya beans could lead to the
devastation of the last remaining rainforests
in Borneo and the Amazon region
Second-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that the development
of second-generation biofuels that donrsquot
compete with food crops and have low
carbon emissions is essential The mainstream
market introduction of second-generation
biofuels would provide a strong incentive
for the application of renewable energy
technologies while minimising the negative
repercussions on food markets and food
security Unilever believes there is a strong
case for government and business investment
in new technologies and further research on
the sustainable use of biomass Support for
second-generation biofuels could be
accelerated through
n RampD facilitation and technology transfer
n Tax exemption andor subsidies
n Phasing out support for poor performing
frst-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels should be
required to achieve at least 50 GHG
savings compared to fossil fuels
Assessing sustainability
We believe governments worldwide have
the responsibility to subject their biofuel
policies to a full impact assessment These
assessments should cover environmental
social and economic impacts from the
regions of production to the end use
Policies which aim to reduce GHG emissions
should contain full lifecycle assessments for
individual biofuels This should ensure that
change in land use is included in the carbon
balance We propose that government
targets should be based on CO2 reductions
rather than volume as well as on availability
of feedstocks
Sustainability standards
Unilever believes sustainability criteria should
be introduced for the use of biomass within
energy programmes These should include
criteria at the production level as well as
criteria at a macro-level such as overall GHG
balance and energy effciency food security
and the protection of biodiversity and
ecosystems The use of biomass for energy
should not be stimulated by government
programmes without the application of
transparent sustainability criteria Proceeding
without these safeguards will risk unintended
consequences that could result in worse
climate change impacts natural habitat loss
and disruption of staple food supplies
unintended consequencesBiofuels could help boost rural development while reducing CO2 emissions and reliance on crude oil But if biofuel strategies are not fully evaluated they could do more harm than good stimulating poor performing biofuels and stifing innovation
CO2 performance
Biofuels can help fght climate change
but CO2 savings vary signifcantly
between fuels (see graphic 5)
This is because the amount of energy needed
to produce different feedstocks (type of
crop and where it is grown) and to process
them into fuels varies considerably For
example using US corn it takes 06ndash08
litres of fossil fuels to produce an amount of
bioethanol equivalent to 1 litre of mineral
oil whereas it takes less than 01 litres of
fossil fuels to produce the same amount of
bioethanol using Brazilian sugarcane15
1500 and 4600 litres of water18 to produce
just one litre of bioethanol There are already
water shortages in many regions and population
growth and climate change will further increase
competition for clean water and increase its cost
Land-use and food availability
The worldrsquos population is rapidly
increasing and is expected to exceed
9 billion19 by 2050 To feed this
growing population will require 50 more food
in the next 20 years
While higher food prices will beneft some
producers they negatively impact the economies
of food-importing countries Poor people who
spend a large proportion of their income on
food will suffer disproportionately compared
with the wealthy Mexico has already experienced
some of the negative consequences of the
growing US bioethanol industry In 2006
Mexicans took to the streets to protest at the
high price of tortillas (a corn bread staple) made
more expensive by demand for maize from USA
bioethanol producers
In 2007 the UN World Food Programme which
fghts famine in Africa announced that it could
no longer afford to maintain its current level of
support due to high commodity prices Its food
purchasing costs rose by almost 50 between
2002 and 2007 854 million23 people suffer from
hunger and this is increasing by an average of
4 million a year at current trends Increasing
food prices will mean that even more people will
depend on food aid
Land is a fnite resource
Some biofuels are much more land
effcient than others because of
higher feedstock yields per hectare and
more effcient production processes (see graphic
10) If we are to feed a growing population using
the fnite amount of agricultural land available
it is vital that governments choose to promote
biofuels that deliver the maximum possible
energy per hectare
First-generation biofuels
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from non-tropical
feedstocks (rape wheat and corn) are not land
effcient It would require a minimum of 26 of
the worldrsquos arable land to run just 20 of its cars
on these fuels
Second-generation biofuels produce even
less CO2 as their feedstocks require fewer
agricultural inputs and production processes
are much more effcient
Biofuels cost more than petrol or diesel per
unit of energy because of the high cost of
feedstocks and production Using biodiesel
and bioethanol from crops grown in Europe
and the USA as a carbon reduction strategy
will cost around $200-$250 per tonne of
CO2 avoided at 2004 prices The cost of
bioethanol from sugarcane as in Brazil
can be comparable to that of fossil fuels
(see graphic 6) Bioethanol from cellulose
(a second-generation biofuel) could already
provide CO2 reductions at less than $200 a
tonne It is likely to remain expensive to
reduce CO2 using biodiesel and bioethanol
from US and European crops even after
2010 The cost of using second-generation
biofuels could come down to under $100 a
tonne with large-scale production
As more governments encourage the use of
biofuels and set mandatory targets demand
will outstrip supply leading to higher prices
for frst- and second-generation biofuels
Deforestation and land-use change
The demand for soya and palm oil
threatens rainforests in Brazil
Indonesia and Malaysia which
are being cleared for plantations These oils
are used by a number of industries but the
growth in biodiesel production is increasing
demand signifcantly
Rainforests store large amounts of carbon
above ground and in the soil which is
released when they are cleared (see
graphic 7) A much smaller amount of carbon
is absorbed by the plantations which replace
the forests This means biofuels grown in
tropical countries can contribute more to
climate change than fossil fuels when their
land-use impact is taken into account
Studies have shown that biodiesel made from
palm oil produces three16 to ten17 times more
CO2 than an equivalent amount of fossil
fuel The situation is even worse for biodiesel
made from soya as the crop yields less oil
and stores less carbon than palm plantations
Peat lands wetlands and grasslands also
release large amounts of carbon if converted
to agricultural use Most biodiesel is made
from rapeseed oil rather than palm oil and
soya bean oil But as an increasing share of
rapeseed oil is used for fuels rather than for
food more soya and palm is being planted
to compensate
Deforestation and land-use change means
that while biofuels can appear to help
governments meet their national greenhouse
gas emissions reduction targets they could in
reality be more damaging to climate change
globally when land-use impact is considered
This means that it is vital for national policies
to take into account the full life-cycle climate
impact of different biofuels
Biodiversity loss
The destruction of tropical forests
and grasslands to make way for
soya and palm plantations causes
signifcant destruction of plant and animal
species including endangered species such
as the orang-utan
Biofuel feedstocks are often grown as a
single crop over a wide area Known as
monoculture this brings high yields but
harms biodiversity These impacts can be
reduced to an extent through mixed planting
and leaving wild areas
Water scarcity
Both frst and second-generation
biofuels require large amounts of
water to grow and process the
feedstocks For example it takes between
In the past farmers have increased production
to meet growing demands But they are now
fnding it hard to keep up ndash in three of the four
years20 between 2003 and 2007 demand for
grains to feed people and livestock outstripped
supply As countries such as China and India
develop more people can afford meat and dairy
products This is driving up demand for agricultural
commodities The booming biofuels industry is
contributing further to this escalation in demand
First-generation biofuels compete with food
crops leading to rising food prices In future this
could jeopardise the worldrsquos ability to feed its
growing population Many other industries also
rely on raw materials like palm oil which are
being diverted to biofuel production
Increased demand higher prices
The biofuels industry is using an
increasing share of the worldrsquos food
crops (see graphic 9) which is driving
up prices Global food prices rose by 1021 in
2006 due to an increase in corn wheat and soya
bean oil prices Prices are predicted to rise by
20ndash5022 over the next decade (compared with
average levels over the last ten years)
Demand for biofuel feedstock increases prices
of other crops For example high demand for
corn to make bioethanol means US farmers are
producing less soya and wheat which is boosting
prices for those crops Biofuels are also raising
meat and dairy prices by pushing up the price of
animal feed
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from palm oil
and sugarcane are more land effcient but
there is limited potential to expand production
of the feedstocks without causing signifcant
environmental damage through loss of natural
forests and grasslands
Second-generation biofuels
To run 20 of the worldrsquos vehicles on second-
generation biofuels would require 7 of its
arable land The feedstocks for these fuels can
also be grown on other types of land such as
pastures and forests
Trade
Even at todayrsquos high oil prices most
biofuels cannot compete on cost with
petrol and diesel Biofuel producers
rely on government subsidies for their profts
Governments are beginning to set mandatory
targets to stimulate investment and demand
for biofuels This is further boosting the price
of agricultural commodities and contributing to
trade distortions
In Brazil a well-established biofuel industry and
low production costs means Brazilian bioethanol
is cost competitive with petrol and diesel The
EU and the USA have set trade barriers to
protect domestic biofuel industries from cheap
Brazilian bioethanol imports This is encouraging
the development of less cost-effective and less
sustainable biofuels This makes it more diffcult
for those developing countries that are better
suited to biofuels production to compete on
world markets
Many governments have proposed mandatory
biofuel targets that exceed their countryrsquos
production and land capacity In future this
could make these countries dependent on
foreign imports which will undermine their
energy security Commodity prices will continue
to rise as competition increases for limited
global supplies
[11] GlobAl iMPAcTS AND uNiNTeNDeD coNSeQueNceS
USA TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2030 30 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
11800000 tonnes
USA accounts for 15 of global biodiesel production
EU TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
730000 tonnes
Europe accounts for 85 of global biodiesel production
China TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 15 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
800000 tonnes
China has imposed a moratorium on projects making bioethanol fuel from corn and other basic food crops
USA corn wheat and soybean
Reduction in US land Bioethanol production used for food crops has pushed up corn pushes production prices sparking elsewhere potentially protests in Mexico causing deforestation
Europe doesnrsquot have enough land to meet its biofuels targets Europe rapeseed oil and wheatand will be dependent on imports
The worldrsquos poorest are already being affected by higher food prices
Brazil sugarcane and soybean
KEY
Issues with food security
Issues with GHGs
Issues with sustainability
Issues with trade
Feedstocks
Areas of tropical rainforest
Trade
Unintended consequences
Sustainability criteria
The social and environmental impacts
of biofuels vary considerably
depending on the type of feedstock
used where it is grown and the processes
needed to turn it into biofuels
Sustainability criteria are required to provide
confdence in the labelling and identifcation
of specifc types of biofuel The criteria should
Brazil TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2010 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
12900000 tonnes
cover the lifecycle CO2 emissions and impacts
on natural habitats as well as socio-economic
factors such as the availability of food for the
local population where feedstocks are produced
In 2007 the Dutch Government announced
sustainability criteria and has proposed a system
to enable traceability of feedstocks by 2020
The UK Government has proposed that 80 of
biofuels meet sustainability standards including
European demand for biodiesel feedstock
98 of Indonesiarsquos raises palm oil price natural rainforest will causing deforestation be degraded or gone by 2022
India TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 20 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
240000 tonnes
Sources FOLicht UN
CO2 reduction requirements by 2010ndash11 The
EU is developing sustainability criteria
Business is also developing sustainability
standards through initiatives such as the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (chaired by
Unilever) and the Roundtable on Sustainable
Biofuels The latter aims to launch draft
sustainability standards in early 2008
Sources FOLicht UN
[10] biofuelS eNeRGY DeliveRY(x 1000 litres of diesel equivalent per hectare)
Source FNR
1013 25
4054
Biomethane(energy crops)
Biomass- to-liquid
Bioethanol(wheat)
Biodiesel(rapeseed oil)
Bioethanol(sugar cane)
Sustainability criteria
The social and environmental impacts
of biofuels vary considerably
depending on the type of feedstock
used where it is grown and the processes
needed to turn it into biofuels
Sustainability criteria are required to provide
confdence in the labelling and identifcation
of specifc types of biofuel The criteria should
100
[5] co2 ReDucTioN of biofuelS coMPAReD WiTh foSSil fuelS ()
Source IEA Energy Technology Perspective 2006
Bioethanol (corn) USA
Bioethanol (wheat)
EU
Biomass to liquid(2nd generation)
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Brazil
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
EU
Fossil fuel
lt10 40-6087
100
1030
[7] RAiNfoReST DefoReSTATioN iMPAcTScarbon storage and co2 emissions per hectare in Se Asia
Sources see back page
RainforestCarbon stored above ground
230tonnescarbon
DeforestationCarbon released as CO2 due to clearing
and burning
830tonnes
CO2
Palm plantationsStores only 20 of carbon per hectare compared to rain-
forest (equivalent to 165 tonnes CO2)
48tonnescarbon
[6] biofuelS SAviNGSbiofuels cost per tonne GhG reduction ($ per tonne co2 equivalent)
Source IEA Biofuels for transportation An international perspective 2004
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Bioethanol (corn)
Bioethanol (grain)
Bioethanol (cellulose)
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
Biodiesel (biomass)
0 200 400 600 800-50
2002Post 2010
[8] PRoJecTeD GRoWTh iN fooD coNSuMPTioN
Source OECD-FAO 2006
-
-
-
-
-
-
2004 2009 2014 2019
100
110
120
130
140
150 Oil and oilseed meals
SugarMeat
CerealsDairy
1st generation biofuel 2nd generation biofuel
cover the lifecycle CO2 emissions and impacts
on natural habitats as well as socio-economic
factors such as the availability of food for the
local population where feedstocks are produced
In 2007 the Dutch Government announced
sustainability criteria and has proposed a system
to enable traceability of feedstocks by 2020
The UK Government has proposed that 80 of
biofuels meet sustainability standards including
CO2 reduction requirements by 2010ndash11 The
EU is developing sustainability criteria
Business is also developing sustainability
standards through initiatives such as the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (chaired by
Unilever) and the Roundtable on Sustainable
Biofuels The latter aims to launch draft
sustainability standards in early 2008
90
2015
2015
[9] PRoPoRTioN of cRoP uSeD foR biofuelS ()
Source The German Marshall Fund of the USA
Brazil sugarcane USA corn
EU rapeseedEU cereals
1995 1995
19951995
2005 2005
20052005
2015
2015
39
45
lt15
20
60
43
16
70
20
0
50USATARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2030 30 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
11800000 tonnes
USA accounts for 15 of global biodiesel production
ChinaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 15 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
800000 tonnes
China has imposed a moratorium on projects making bioethanol fuel from corn and other basic food crops
BrazilTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2010 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
12900000 tonnes
IndiaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 20 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
240000 tonnes
EUTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
730000 tonnes
Europe accounts for 85 of global biodiesel production
Reduction in US land used for food crops pushes production elsewhere potentially causing deforestation
Brazil sugarcane and soybean
European demand for biodiesel feedstock raises palm oil price causing deforestation
Europe doesnrsquot have enough land to meet its biofuels targets and will be dependent on imports
USA corn wheat and soybean
Bioethanol production has pushed up corn prices sparking protests in Mexico
The worldrsquos poorest are already being affected by higher food prices
98 of Indonesiarsquos natural rainforest will be degraded or gone by 2022
KEY
Issues with food security
Issues with GHGs
Issues with sustainability
Issues with trade
Areas of tropical rainforest
Trade
Unintended consequences
Feedstocks
Europe rapeseed oil and wheat
unintended consequencesBiofuels could help boost rural development while reducing CO2 emissions and reliance on crude oil But if biofuel strategies are not fully evaluated they could do more harm than good stimulating poor performing biofuels and stifing innovation
CO2 performance
Biofuels can help fght climate change
but CO2 savings vary signifcantly
between fuels (see graphic 5)
This is because the amount of energy needed
to produce different feedstocks (type of
crop and where it is grown) and to process
them into fuels varies considerably For
example using US corn it takes 06ndash08
litres of fossil fuels to produce an amount of
bioethanol equivalent to 1 litre of mineral
oil whereas it takes less than 01 litres of
fossil fuels to produce the same amount of
bioethanol using Brazilian sugarcane15
1500 and 4600 litres of water18 to produce
just one litre of bioethanol There are already
water shortages in many regions and population
growth and climate change will further increase
competition for clean water and increase its cost
Land-use and food availability
The worldrsquos population is rapidly
increasing and is expected to exceed
9 billion19 by 2050 To feed this
growing population will require 50 more food
in the next 20 years
While higher food prices will beneft some
producers they negatively impact the economies
of food-importing countries Poor people who
spend a large proportion of their income on
food will suffer disproportionately compared
with the wealthy Mexico has already experienced
some of the negative consequences of the
growing US bioethanol industry In 2006
Mexicans took to the streets to protest at the
high price of tortillas (a corn bread staple) made
more expensive by demand for maize from USA
bioethanol producers
In 2007 the UN World Food Programme which
fghts famine in Africa announced that it could
no longer afford to maintain its current level of
support due to high commodity prices Its food
purchasing costs rose by almost 50 between
2002 and 2007 854 million23 people suffer from
hunger and this is increasing by an average of
4 million a year at current trends Increasing
food prices will mean that even more people will
depend on food aid
Land is a fnite resource
Some biofuels are much more land
effcient than others because of
higher feedstock yields per hectare and
more effcient production processes (see graphic
10) If we are to feed a growing population using
the fnite amount of agricultural land available
it is vital that governments choose to promote
biofuels that deliver the maximum possible
energy per hectare
First-generation biofuels
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from non-tropical
feedstocks (rape wheat and corn) are not land
effcient It would require a minimum of 26 of
the worldrsquos arable land to run just 20 of its cars
on these fuels
[11] GlobAl iMPAcTS AND uNiNTeNDeD coNSeQueNceS
Second-generation biofuels produce even
less CO2 as their feedstocks require fewer
agricultural inputs and production processes
are much more effcient
Biofuels cost more than petrol or diesel per
unit of energy because of the high cost of
feedstocks and production Using biodiesel
and bioethanol from crops grown in Europe
and the USA as a carbon reduction strategy
will cost around $200-$250 per tonne of
CO2 avoided at 2004 prices The cost of
bioethanol from sugarcane as in Brazil
can be comparable to that of fossil fuels
(see graphic 6) Bioethanol from cellulose
(a second-generation biofuel) could already
provide CO2 reductions at less than $200 a
tonne It is likely to remain expensive to
reduce CO2 using biodiesel and bioethanol
from US and European crops even after
2010 The cost of using second-generation
biofuels could come down to under $100 a
tonne with large-scale production
As more governments encourage the use of
biofuels and set mandatory targets demand
will outstrip supply leading to higher prices
for frst- and second-generation biofuels
Deforestation and land-use change
The demand for soya and palm oil
threatens rainforests in Brazil
Indonesia and Malaysia which
are being cleared for plantations These oils
are used by a number of industries but the
growth in biodiesel production is increasing
demand signifcantly
Rainforests store large amounts of carbon
above ground and in the soil which is
released when they are cleared (see
graphic 7) A much smaller amount of carbon
is absorbed by the plantations which replace
the forests This means biofuels grown in
tropical countries can contribute more to
climate change than fossil fuels when their
land-use impact is taken into account
Studies have shown that biodiesel made from
palm oil produces three16 to ten17 times more
CO2 than an equivalent amount of fossil
fuel The situation is even worse for biodiesel
made from soya as the crop yields less oil
and stores less carbon than palm plantations
Peat lands wetlands and grasslands also
release large amounts of carbon if converted
to agricultural use Most biodiesel is made
from rapeseed oil rather than palm oil and
soya bean oil But as an increasing share of
rapeseed oil is used for fuels rather than for
food more soya and palm is being planted
to compensate
Deforestation and land-use change means
that while biofuels can appear to help
governments meet their national greenhouse
gas emissions reduction targets they could in
reality be more damaging to climate change
globally when land-use impact is considered
This means that it is vital for national policies
to take into account the full life-cycle climate
impact of different biofuels
Biodiversity loss
The destruction of tropical forests
and grasslands to make way for
soya and palm plantations causes
signifcant destruction of plant and animal
species including endangered species such
as the orang-utan
Biofuel feedstocks are often grown as a
single crop over a wide area Known as
monoculture this brings high yields but
harms biodiversity These impacts can be
reduced to an extent through mixed planting
and leaving wild areas
Water scarcity
Both frst and second-generation
biofuels require large amounts of
water to grow and process the
feedstocks For example it takes between
In the past farmers have increased production
to meet growing demands But they are now
fnding it hard to keep up ndash in three of the four
years20 between 2003 and 2007 demand for
grains to feed people and livestock outstripped
supply As countries such as China and India
develop more people can afford meat and dairy
products This is driving up demand for agricultural
commodities The booming biofuels industry is
contributing further to this escalation in demand
First-generation biofuels compete with food
crops leading to rising food prices In future this
could jeopardise the worldrsquos ability to feed its
growing population Many other industries also
rely on raw materials like palm oil which are
being diverted to biofuel production
Increased demand higher prices
The biofuels industry is using an
increasing share of the worldrsquos food
crops (see graphic 9) which is driving
up prices Global food prices rose by 1021 in
2006 due to an increase in corn wheat and soya
bean oil prices Prices are predicted to rise by
20ndash5022 over the next decade (compared with
average levels over the last ten years)
Demand for biofuel feedstock increases prices
of other crops For example high demand for
corn to make bioethanol means US farmers are
producing less soya and wheat which is boosting
prices for those crops Biofuels are also raising
meat and dairy prices by pushing up the price of
animal feed
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from palm oil
and sugarcane are more land effcient but
there is limited potential to expand production
of the feedstocks without causing signifcant
environmental damage through loss of natural
forests and grasslands
Second-generation biofuels
To run 20 of the worldrsquos vehicles on second-
generation biofuels would require 7 of its
arable land The feedstocks for these fuels can
also be grown on other types of land such as
pastures and forests
Trade
Even at todayrsquos high oil prices most
biofuels cannot compete on cost with
petrol and diesel Biofuel producers
rely on government subsidies for their profts
Governments are beginning to set mandatory
targets to stimulate investment and demand
for biofuels This is further boosting the price
of agricultural commodities and contributing to
trade distortions
In Brazil a well-established biofuel industry and
low production costs means Brazilian bioethanol
is cost competitive with petrol and diesel The
EU and the USA have set trade barriers to
protect domestic biofuel industries from cheap
Brazilian bioethanol imports This is encouraging
the development of less cost-effective and less
sustainable biofuels This makes it more diffcult
for those developing countries that are better
suited to biofuels production to compete on
world markets
Many governments have proposed mandatory
biofuel targets that exceed their countryrsquos
production and land capacity In future this
could make these countries dependent on
foreign imports which will undermine their
energy security Commodity prices will continue
to rise as competition increases for limited
global supplies
The unilever position Unilever supports sustainable biofuels that deliver social and environmental benefts across their entire lifecycle
Unilever supports renewable energy
initiatives that deliver benefts on a lifecycle
basis helping to combat climate change and
reduce dependency on fossil fuels Around
17 of the energy we use for our operations
comes from renewable sources
Why the issue matters to Unilever
Two-thirds of the raw materials we use
come from agriculture These materials are
essential to our business and Unilever has
a clear interest in how they are grown and
in securing future supplies That is why
we have worked to improve the social and
environmental standards of agriculture
for more than a decade Our sustainable
agriculture programmes include palm oil
oilseed rape sunfowers spinach tomatoes
and tea We are also a member of several
sustainability initiatives including the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil
Demand for biofuels feedstock has already
reduced the availability of raw materials and
driven up prices We are concerned that
increased demand will destabilise world
food supply and undermine sustainable
agriculture Use of vegetable oils such as
rapeseed oil for biofuels could also create
shortages driving consumers to less healthy
animal fats
Lifecycle analysis
Unilever believes that individual biofuels
should be examined carefully to ensure
that the unintended environmental
(deforestation and biodiversity loss) and
socio-economic (food security) consequences
do not undermine the positive impacts
Biofuels must also be evaluated across their
lifecycle to achieve genuine greenhouse gas
(GHG) reductions
Biomass is a valuable resource Using it
to generate heat and electricity is a more
effcient and cost-effective way of reducing
CO2 emissions than using it to make
transport fuels24 New vehicle technologies
such as electric and hybrid and more
effcient engines offer signifcant scope
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
from transport
First-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that some frst-generation
biofuels are neither environmentally effcient
nor cost-effective ways to reduce emissions
Many studies have shown that several frst-
generation biofuels have poor performance
with regard to reducing GHG emissions and
dependency on fossil fuels Some even cause
more GHG emissions than the fossil fuels
they replace25
We are concerned that the use of valuable
food crops for energy purposes will increase
pressure on ecosystems and biodiversity
Deforestation particularly to make way for
palm oil and soya beans could lead to the
devastation of the last remaining rainforests
in Borneo and the Amazon region
Second-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that the development
of second-generation biofuels that donrsquot
compete with food crops and have low
carbon emissions is essential The mainstream
market introduction of second-generation
biofuels would provide a strong incentive
for the application of renewable energy
technologies while minimising the negative
repercussions on food markets and food
security Unilever believes there is a strong
case for government and business investment
in new technologies and further research on
the sustainable use of biomass Support for
second-generation biofuels could be
accelerated through
n RampD facilitation and technology transfer
n Tax exemption andor subsidies
n Phasing out support for poor performing
frst-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels should be
required to achieve at least 50 GHG
savings compared to fossil fuels
Assessing sustainability
We believe governments worldwide have
the responsibility to subject their biofuel
policies to a full impact assessment These
assessments should cover environmental
social and economic impacts from the
regions of production to the end use
Policies which aim to reduce GHG emissions
should contain full lifecycle assessments for
individual biofuels This should ensure that
change in land use is included in the carbon
balance We propose that government
targets should be based on CO2 reductions
rather than volume as well as on availability
of feedstocks
Sustainability standards
Unilever believes sustainability criteria should
be introduced for the use of biomass within
energy programmes These should include
criteria at the production level as well as
criteria at a macro-level such as overall GHG
balance and energy effciency food security
and the protection of biodiversity and
ecosystems The use of biomass for energy
should not be stimulated by government
programmes without the application of
transparent sustainability criteria Proceeding
without these safeguards will risk unintended
consequences that could result in worse
climate change impacts natural habitat loss
and disruption of staple food supplies
Whatrsquos driving biofuels growthBiofuels have existed for over a hundred years ndash Henry Ford designed his Model T to run on bioethanol ndash but they have mostly been unable to compete with fuels derived from crude oil New government energy policies subsidies and tax exemptions are now stimulating biofuels production which has doubled since 1998 and is predicted to double again by 20115 There are a number of reasons why governments favour biofuels
Combating climate change
Transport is a signifcant contributor to
climate change accounting for around
25 of man-made greenhouse gas
emissions globally
In principle the use of biofuels can help
reduce transportrsquos impact on climate
change This is because the plants used
to make the fuels absorb carbon dioxide
(CO2) ndash the most important greenhouse
gas ndash as they grow The gas is later
released when the biofuels are used
However biofuels are not carbon neutral
It takes energy to grow and harvest the
plants and to process and distribute
biofuels The entire process emits CO2
and fertilisers emit nitrous oxide (N2O) a
powerful greenhouse gas (see graphic 4)
The amount of energy needed to make
different biofuels varies considerably This
makes it vital to take the entire production
process into account when assessing
the potential of biofuels to help reduce
transport CO2 emissions Read more about
CO2 performance overleaf
Technology and innovation
Unlike other renewable fuels such
as hydrogen the infrastructure to
manufacture and distribute biofuels is in
place today Biofuels are also compatible
with todayrsquos vehicles and power
generation technology
In 2006 $26 billion6 was invested in
biofuels The International Energy Agency
(IEA)7 estimates that between 2005 and
2030 it will cost $160 billion to expand
biofuel production to fuel 4 of global
road transport and $225 billion to fuel 7
Energy security
Global energy demands are increasing
rapidly The worldrsquos population has
doubled in the last four decades ndash to
around 66 billion in 2004 ndash and is
expected to exceed 9 billion8 by 2050
Rapid development particularly in China
and India is increasing wealth and this is
boosting demands for energy and transport
There were around 900 million vehicles
on the road in 2000 but this is forecast to
increase to over 2 billion by 20509
Fossil fuels (oil coal and gas) are
expected to be the dominant source of
energy for the foreseeable future But
production has already peaked in many
major oil-producing countries and new
developments are increasingly located in
environmentally challenging and politically
unstable parts of the world This has
resulted in high oil prices which the IEA
predicts will remain between $48ndash$62
until 203010 Some analysts predict 2030
prices could be as high as $10011 High oil
prices hit developing countries the hardest
ndash some spend six times as much on fuel as
on health12
Biofuels are seen by governments as a
secure source of energy and a way to
reduce reliance on imported fossil fuels
Brazil has replaced around 1513 of its
petrol consumption with bioethanol
according to the IEA The Washington Post puts this fgure at 4014
Rural development
Biofuels can help boost farm incomes
Globalisation and the industrialisation of
farming have reduced the price farmers
get for their produce Demand for the
agricultural commodities used to make
biofuels is reversing this trend In the
developed world this is creating jobs
and reducing the need for subsidies
for farmers
[4] biofuel co2 lifecYcle iMPAcTS
CO2
Fertilising
Harvesting Transporting
Processing
Transporting
Use
Growing
CO2
CO2 CO2
CO2
CO2
CO2
Energy
EnergyEnergy
EnergyEnergy
Energy
N2O
[2] fiRST-GeNeRATioN biofuelS bioDieSel Production process
Soybean oil
Diesel mix
Palm oil Rapeseed oil
Methyl esters
Transesterifcation
[1] fiRST-GeNeRATioN biofuelS bioeThANol Production process
Sugarcane
Sugar
Petrol mix
Corn
Starch
bioethanol
fermentation
biomass to liquid production process
Petrol mixDiesel mix
celluose ethanol production process
[3] SecoND-GeNeRATioN biofuelS
biochemical treatment
enzymatic hydrolysis
Sugar
fermentation
cellulose ethanol
Thermochemical treatmentgasifcation
Synthesis gas
Synthesis
hydrocarbons
Biomass including agricultural
residues
Special crops such as fast growing woody plants
Changes in government energy policies
are accelerating demand for liquid or
gaseous biofuels used in transport (see
facing page)
Transport biofuels can be distributed using
existing technology and used in todayrsquos
vehicles without modifcation when mixed
with petrol or diesel or in adapted vehicles
if used neat or in high concentrations
There are many different biofuels made
using a variety of production processes
and feedstocks There are two categories
First-generation biofuels made from
food crops These are widely used today
Second-generation biofuels made from
non-food crops These are in development
and will not be widely commercially
available for at least fve to ten years
First-generation biofuels
First-generation biofuels are made from
food crops including wheat rapeseed
corn soya and sugarcane
There are two main types of frst-generation
biofuels now in commercial use
Bioethanol Bioethanol is made by fermenting sugars
produced by plants (similar to beer and
wine production) Bioethanol accounts for
around 851 of global biofuel production
and is mainly produced from corn and
sugarcane
Bioethanol is usually blended with petrol ndash
todayrsquos fuel standards allow bioethanol to
be mixed with petrol in volumes up to 5
in Europe and 10 in the USA Bioethanol
can be used at higher concentrations
or neat For example in Brazil all petrol
contains at least 20ndash25 bioethanol and
many vehicles have been adapted to run
on 100 bioethanol
Bioethanol has a lower energy density
than petrol This makes it about 402 less
fuel effcient
defo
rest
atio
n la
nd-u
se ch
ange
hig
h fo
od p
rices
land
-use
cha
e h
igh
food
pric
es f
ood
shor
tage
s la
nd a
vaila
bilit
y
food
shortag
es land ava
ilability
trad
e dist
or
tions
rura
l dev
elop
men
t en
ergy
secu
rity
CO2 savi
ngs sust
ainab
ilit
y sta
ndar
ds
trad
e di
stor
tions
wat
er sh
orta
ges
biodi
versi
ty lo
ss
ener
gy s
ecur
ity C
O2
sav
ngs
sus
tain
abilit
y st
anda
rds
inno
vatio
ns
What are biofuelsBiofuels are made by processing food crops and other plants animal products or wastes (collectively known as biomass) These can be burnt to generate electricity or heat and are increasingly being used as transport fuels
PRoMoTiNG SuSTAiNAble biofuelS
Biodiesel Biodiesel is a blend of methyl esters (a type
of biofuel) and diesel Methyl esters are
produced by a chemical reaction between a
vegetable oil and an alcohol They are made
from rapeseed (primarily) palm oil and
soybean oil and account for around 153
of global biofuel production
Biodiesel is the most commonly used
biofuel in Europe where fuel standards
allow 5 blends USA fuel standards allow
blends of up to 204 Specially designed
vehicles can run on 100 biodiesel
Second-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels are made from
non-food feedstocks such as wood and
straw The production process uses the
whole plant rather than just the plant
starches or sugars that are used to make
frst-generation biofuels This means waste
materials from agricultural and forestry can
be used as feedstocks
There are a number of second-generation
biofuels under development These include
cellulose ethanol which is produced from
straw using enzymes and can be mixed
with petrol biomass-to-liquid fuel which
is made from wood feedstocks and can be
blended with diesel and biomethane a
gas made from organic material (such as
manure and straw) which can be used in
modifed petrol and diesel engines
Sources of information 1 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
2 International Energy Agency httpieaorgtextbasework2004 eswg21_NCVpdf
3 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
4 httpwwwbiodieselorgresourcesfuelfactsheetsstandards_ and_warrantiesshtm
5 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
6 United Nations Environment Programme Global Trends in Sustainable Energy Investment 2007
7 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
8 United Nations World Population to 2300 2004
9 World Business Council for Sustainable Development Energy amp Climate Change Facts and Trends to 2050 2004
10 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
11 Energy Information Administration Annual Energy Outlook 2007
12 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
13 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
14 Washington Post 200807
15 International Energy Agency Biofuels for Transport ndash An International Perspective 2004
16 Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ 2006
17 Delft Hydraulics
18 Based on Food and Agriculture Organization data available at wwwwaterfootprintorg
19 United Nations World Population to 2300 2004
20 Economist 23607
21 International Monetary Fund World Economic Report April 2007
22 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Food and Agriculture Organization Agricultural Outlook 2007-2016
23 Food and Agriculture Organization State of Food Insecurity in the World 2006
24 International Energy Agency Biofuels For Transport An International Perspective 2004
25 Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ (2006) and Delft Hydraulics
Rainforest Deforestation Impacts [7] graphic
Journal of Cleaner Production 2006 Palm Oil and the Emission of Carbon-Based Greenhouse Gases Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ
Journal of Tropical Forest Science 2005 An Assessment of Changes in Biomass Carbon Stocks in Tree Crops and Forests in Malaysia Henson IE
Oil World Annual 2007 ISTA Mielke GmbH
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Volume 2 Energy 2006
Writing and consultancy Context
Design and production Red Letter Design
Illustrations (Graphics 4 and 7) KJA-artistscom
Printing Scanplus (on paper made from responsibly managed forests)
Unilever NV Weena 455 PO Box 760 3000 DK Rotterdam The Netherlands T +31 (0)10 217 4000 F +31 (0)10 217 4798
Commercial Register Rotterdam Number 24051830
Unilever PLC PO Box 68 100 Victoria Embankment London EC4P 4BQ United Kingdom T +44 (0)20 7822 5252 F +44 (0)20 7822 5951
Unilever PLC registered offce Unilever PLC Port Sunlight Wirral Merseyside CH62 4ZD United Kingdom
Registered in England and Wales Company Number 41424
wwwunilevercom
[2] fiRST-GeNeRATioN biofuelS bioDieSel Production process
Soybean oil
Diesel mix
Palm oil Rapeseed oil
Methyl esters
Transesterifcation
[1] fiRST-GeNeRATioN biofuelS bioeThANol Production process
Sugarcane
Sugar
Petrol mix
Corn
Starch
bioethanol
fermentation
biomass to liquid production process
Petrol mixDiesel mix
celluose ethanol production process
[3] SecoND-GeNeRATioN biofuelS
biochemical treatment
enzymatic hydrolysis
Sugar
fermentation
cellulose ethanol
Thermochemical treatmentgasifcation
Synthesis gas
Synthesis
hydrocarbons
Biomass including agricultural
residues
Special crops such as fast growing woody plants
Changes in government energy policies
are accelerating demand for liquid or
gaseous biofuels used in transport (see
facing page)
Transport biofuels can be distributed using
existing technology and used in todayrsquos
vehicles without modifcation when mixed
with petrol or diesel or in adapted vehicles
if used neat or in high concentrations
There are many different biofuels made
using a variety of production processes
and feedstocks There are two categories
First-generation biofuels made from
food crops These are widely used today
Second-generation biofuels made from
non-food crops These are in development
and will not be widely commercially
available for at least fve to ten years
First-generation biofuels
First-generation biofuels are made from
food crops including wheat rapeseed
corn soya and sugarcane
There are two main types of frst-generation
biofuels now in commercial use
Bioethanol Bioethanol is made by fermenting sugars
produced by plants (similar to beer and
wine production) Bioethanol accounts for
around 851 of global biofuel production
and is mainly produced from corn and
sugarcane
Bioethanol is usually blended with petrol ndash
todayrsquos fuel standards allow bioethanol to
be mixed with petrol in volumes up to 5
in Europe and 10 in the USA Bioethanol
can be used at higher concentrations
or neat For example in Brazil all petrol
contains at least 20ndash25 bioethanol and
many vehicles have been adapted to run
on 100 bioethanol
Bioethanol has a lower energy density
than petrol This makes it about 402 less
fuel effcient
defo
rest
atio
n la
nd-u
se ch
ange
hig
h fo
od p
rices
land
-use
cha
e h
igh
food
pric
es f
ood
shor
tage
s la
nd a
vaila
bilit
y
food
shortag
es land ava
ilability
trad
e dist
or
tions
rura
l dev
elop
men
t en
ergy
secu
rity
CO2 savi
ngs sust
ainab
ilit
y sta
ndar
ds
trad
e di
stor
tions
wat
er sh
orta
ges
biodi
versi
ty lo
ss
ener
gy s
ecur
ity C
O2
sav
ngs
sus
tain
abilit
y st
anda
rds
inno
vatio
ns
What are biofuelsBiofuels are made by processing food crops and other plants animal products or wastes (collectively known as biomass) These can be burnt to generate electricity or heat and are increasingly being used as transport fuels
Sources of information1 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
2 International Energy Agency httpieaorgtextbasework2004eswg21_NCVpdf
3 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
4 httpwwwbiodieselorgresourcesfuelfactsheetsstandards_and_warrantiesshtm
5 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
6 United Nations Environment Programme Global Trends in Sustainable Energy Investment 2007
7 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
8 United Nations World Population to 2300 2004
9 World Business Council for Sustainable Development Energy amp Climate Change Facts and Trends to 2050 2004
10 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
11 Energy Information Administration Annual Energy Outlook 2007
12 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
13 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
14 Washington Post 200807
15 International Energy Agency Biofuels for Transport ndash An International Perspective 2004
16 Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ 2006
17 Delft Hydraulics
18 Based on Food and Agriculture Organization data available at wwwwaterfootprintorg
19 United Nations World Population to 2300 2004
20 Economist 23607
21 International Monetary Fund World Economic Report April 2007
22 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and DevelopmentFood and Agriculture Organization Agricultural Outlook 2007-2016
23 Food and Agriculture Organization State of Food Insecurity in the World 2006
24 International Energy Agency Biofuels For Transport An International Perspective 2004
25 Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ (2006) and Delft Hydraulics
Rainforest Deforestation Impacts [7] graphic
Journal of Cleaner Production 2006 Palm Oil and the Emission of Carbon-Based Greenhouse Gases Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ
Journal of Tropical Forest Science 2005 An Assessment of Changes in Biomass Carbon Stocks in Tree Crops and Forests in Malaysia Henson IE
Oil World Annual 2007 ISTA Mielke GmbH
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Volume 2 Energy 2006
Unilever NVWeena 455 PO Box 7603000 DK RotterdamThe NetherlandsT +31 (0)10 217 4000F +31 (0)10 217 4798
Commercial Register RotterdamNumber 24051830
Unilever PLCPO Box 68100 Victoria Embankment London EC4P 4BQ United KingdomT +44 (0)20 7822 5252F +44 (0)20 7822 5951
Unilever PLC registered offceUnilever PLCPort SunlightWirralMerseyside CH62 4ZDUnited Kingdom
Registered in England and WalesCompany Number 41424
wwwunilevercom
Writing and consultancy Context
Design and production Red Letter Design
Illustrations (Graphics 4 and 7) KJA-artistscom
Printing Scanplus (on paper made from responsibly managed forests)
PRoMoTiNG SuSTAiNAble biofuelS
Biodiesel Biodiesel is a blend of methyl esters (a type
of biofuel) and diesel Methyl esters are
produced by a chemical reaction between a
vegetable oil and an alcohol They are made
from rapeseed (primarily) palm oil and
soybean oil and account for around 153
of global biofuel production
Biodiesel is the most commonly used
biofuel in Europe where fuel standards
allow 5 blends USA fuel standards allow
blends of up to 204 Specially designed
vehicles can run on 100 biodiesel
Second-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels are made from
non-food feedstocks such as wood and
straw The production process uses the
whole plant rather than just the plant
starches or sugars that are used to make
frst-generation biofuels This means waste
materials from agricultural and forestry can
be used as feedstocks
There are a number of second-generation
biofuels under development These include
cellulose ethanol which is produced from
straw using enzymes and can be mixed
with petrol biomass-to-liquid fuel which
is made from wood feedstocks and can be
blended with diesel and biomethane a
gas made from organic material (such as
manure and straw) which can be used in
modifed petrol and diesel engines
Whatrsquos driving biofuels growth Biofuels have existed for over a hundred years ndash Henry Ford designed his Model T to run on bioethanol ndash but they have mostly been unable to compete with fuels derived from crude oil New government energy policies subsidies and tax exemptions are now stimulating biofuels production which has doubled since 1998 and is predicted to double again by 20115 There are a number of reasons why governments favour biofuels
[4] biofuel co2 lifecYcle iMPAcTS
Fertilising
CO2
CO2
N2O Growing
Energy
Combating climate change
Transport is a signifcant contributor to
climate change accounting for around
25 of man-made greenhouse gas
emissions globally
In principle the use of biofuels can help
reduce transportrsquos impact on climate
change This is because the plants used
to make the fuels absorb carbon dioxide
(CO2) ndash the most important greenhouse
gas ndash as they grow The gas is later
released when the biofuels are used
However biofuels are not carbon neutral
It takes energy to grow and harvest the
plants and to process and distribute
biofuels The entire process emits CO2
and fertilisers emit nitrous oxide (N2O) a
powerful greenhouse gas (see graphic 4)
The amount of energy needed to make
different biofuels varies considerably This
makes it vital to take the entire production
process into account when assessing
the potential of biofuels to help reduce
transport CO2 emissions Read more about
CO2 performance overleaf
Technology and innovation
Unlike other renewable fuels such
as hydrogen the infrastructure to
Processing
Harvesting Transporting
CO2
CO2 CO2
Energy
Energy Energy
manufacture and distribute biofuels is in
place today Biofuels are also compatible
with todayrsquos vehicles and power
generation technology
In 2006 $26 billion6 was invested in
biofuels The International Energy Agency
(IEA)7 estimates that between 2005 and
2030 it will cost $160 billion to expand
biofuel production to fuel 4 of global
road transport and $225 billion to fuel 7
Energy security
Global energy demands are increasing
rapidly The worldrsquos population has
doubled in the last four decades ndash to
around 66 billion in 2004 ndash and is
expected to exceed 9 billion8 by 2050
Rapid development particularly in China
and India is increasing wealth and this is
boosting demands for energy and transport
There were around 900 million vehicles
on the road in 2000 but this is forecast to
increase to over 2 billion by 20509
Fossil fuels (oil coal and gas) are
expected to be the dominant source of
energy for the foreseeable future But
production has already peaked in many
major oil-producing countries and new
developments are increasingly located in
environmentally challenging and politically
Transporting
CO2 Use
CO2
Energy
Energy
unstable parts of the world This has
resulted in high oil prices which the IEA
predicts will remain between $48ndash$62
until 203010 Some analysts predict 2030
prices could be as high as $10011 High oil
prices hit developing countries the hardest
ndash some spend six times as much on fuel as
on health12
Biofuels are seen by governments as a
secure source of energy and a way to
reduce reliance on imported fossil fuels
Brazil has replaced around 1513 of its
petrol consumption with bioethanol
according to the IEA The Washington Post puts this fgure at 4014
Rural development
Biofuels can help boost farm incomes
Globalisation and the industrialisation of
farming have reduced the price farmers
get for their produce Demand for the
agricultural commodities used to make
biofuels is reversing this trend In the
developed world this is creating jobs
and reducing the need for subsidies
for farmers
Sources FOLicht UN
[10] biofuelS eNeRGY DeliveRY(x 1000 litres of diesel equivalent per hectare)
Source FNR
1013 25
4054
Biomethane(energy crops)
Biomass- to-liquid
Bioethanol(wheat)
Biodiesel(rapeseed oil)
Bioethanol(sugar cane)
Sustainability criteria
The social and environmental impacts
of biofuels vary considerably
depending on the type of feedstock
used where it is grown and the processes
needed to turn it into biofuels
Sustainability criteria are required to provide
confdence in the labelling and identifcation
of specifc types of biofuel The criteria should
[8] PRoJecTeD GRoWTh iN fooD coNSuMPTioN
Source OECD-FAO 2006
-
-
-
-
-
-
2004 2009 2014 2019
100
110
120
130
140
150 Oil and oilseed meals
SugarMeat
CerealsDairy
1st generation biofuel 2nd generation biofuel
cover the lifecycle CO2 emissions and impacts
on natural habitats as well as socio-economic
factors such as the availability of food for the
local population where feedstocks are produced
In 2007 the Dutch Government announced
sustainability criteria and has proposed a system
to enable traceability of feedstocks by 2020
The UK Government has proposed that 80 of
biofuels meet sustainability standards including
CO2 reduction requirements by 2010ndash11 The
EU is developing sustainability criteria
Business is also developing sustainability
standards through initiatives such as the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (chaired by
Unilever) and the Roundtable on Sustainable
Biofuels The latter aims to launch draft
sustainability standards in early 2008
90
2015
2015
[9] PRoPoRTioN of cRoP uSeD foR biofuelS ()
Source The German Marshall Fund of the USA
Brazil sugarcane USA corn
EU rapeseedEU cereals
1995 1995
19951995
2005 2005
20052005
2015
2015
39
45
lt15
20
60
43
16
70
20
0
50USATARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2030 30 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
11800000 tonnes
USA accounts for 15 of global biodiesel production
ChinaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 15 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
800000 tonnes
China has imposed a moratorium on projects making bioethanol fuel from corn and other basic food crops
BrazilTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2010 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
12900000 tonnes
IndiaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 20 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
240000 tonnes
EUTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
730000 tonnes
Europe accounts for 85 of global biodiesel production
Reduction in US land used for food crops pushes production elsewhere potentially causing deforestation
Brazil sugarcane and soybean
European demand for biodiesel feedstock raises palm oil price causing deforestation
Europe doesnrsquot have enough land to meet its biofuels targets and will be dependent on imports
USA corn wheat and soybean
Bioethanol production has pushed up corn prices sparking protests in Mexico
The worldrsquos poorest are already being affected by higher food prices
98 of Indonesiarsquos natural rainforest will be degraded or gone by 2022
KEY
Issues with food security
Issues with GHGs
Issues with sustainability
Issues with trade
Areas of tropical rainforest
Trade
Unintended consequences
Feedstocks
Europe rapeseed oil and wheat
The unilever positionUnilever supports sustainable biofuels that deliver social and environmental benefts across their entire lifecycle
Unilever supports renewable energy
initiatives that deliver benefts on a lifecycle
basis helping to combat climate change and
reduce dependency on fossil fuels Around
17 of the energy we use for our operations
comes from renewable sources
Why the issue matters to Unilever
Two-thirds of the raw materials we use
come from agriculture These materials are
essential to our business and Unilever has
a clear interest in how they are grown and
in securing future supplies That is why
we have worked to improve the social and
environmental standards of agriculture
for more than a decade Our sustainable
agriculture programmes include palm oil
oilseed rape sunfowers spinach tomatoes
and tea We are also a member of several
sustainability initiatives including the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil
Demand for biofuels feedstock has already
reduced the availability of raw materials and
driven up prices We are concerned that
increased demand will destabilise world
food supply and undermine sustainable
agriculture Use of vegetable oils such as
rapeseed oil for biofuels could also create
shortages driving consumers to less healthy
animal fats
Lifecycle analysis
Unilever believes that individual biofuels
should be examined carefully to ensure
that the unintended environmental
(deforestation and biodiversity loss) and
socio-economic (food security) consequences
do not undermine the positive impacts
Biofuels must also be evaluated across their
lifecycle to achieve genuine greenhouse gas
(GHG) reductions
Biomass is a valuable resource Using it
to generate heat and electricity is a more
effcient and cost-effective way of reducing
CO2 emissions than using it to make
transport fuels24 New vehicle technologies
such as electric and hybrid and more
effcient engines offer signifcant scope
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
from transport
First-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that some frst-generation
biofuels are neither environmentally effcient
nor cost-effective ways to reduce emissions
Many studies have shown that several frst-
generation biofuels have poor performance
with regard to reducing GHG emissions and
dependency on fossil fuels Some even cause
more GHG emissions than the fossil fuels
they replace25
We are concerned that the use of valuable
food crops for energy purposes will increase
pressure on ecosystems and biodiversity
Deforestation particularly to make way for
palm oil and soya beans could lead to the
devastation of the last remaining rainforests
in Borneo and the Amazon region
Second-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that the development
of second-generation biofuels that donrsquot
compete with food crops and have low
carbon emissions is essential The mainstream
market introduction of second-generation
biofuels would provide a strong incentive
for the application of renewable energy
technologies while minimising the negative
repercussions on food markets and food
security Unilever believes there is a strong
case for government and business investment
in new technologies and further research on
the sustainable use of biomass Support for
second-generation biofuels could be
accelerated through
n RampD facilitation and technology transfer
n Tax exemption andor subsidies
n Phasing out support for poor performing
frst-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels should be
required to achieve at least 50 GHG
savings compared to fossil fuels
Assessing sustainability
We believe governments worldwide have
the responsibility to subject their biofuel
policies to a full impact assessment These
assessments should cover environmental
social and economic impacts from the
regions of production to the end use
Policies which aim to reduce GHG emissions
should contain full lifecycle assessments for
individual biofuels This should ensure that
change in land use is included in the carbon
balance We propose that government
targets should be based on CO2 reductions
rather than volume as well as on availability
of feedstocks
Sustainability standards
Unilever believes sustainability criteria should
be introduced for the use of biomass within
energy programmes These should include
criteria at the production level as well as
criteria at a macro-level such as overall GHG
balance and energy effciency food security
and the protection of biodiversity and
ecosystems The use of biomass for energy
should not be stimulated by government
programmes without the application of
transparent sustainability criteria Proceeding
without these safeguards will risk unintended
consequences that could result in worse
climate change impacts natural habitat loss
and disruption of staple food supplies
1500 and 4600 litres of water18 to produce
just one litre of bioethanol There are already
water shortages in many regions and population
growth and climate change will further increase
competition for clean water and increase its cost
Land-use and food availability
The worldrsquos population is rapidly
increasing and is expected to exceed
9 billion19 by 2050 To feed this
growing population will require 50 more food
in the next 20 years
While higher food prices will beneft some
producers they negatively impact the economies
of food-importing countries Poor people who
spend a large proportion of their income on
food will suffer disproportionately compared
with the wealthy Mexico has already experienced
some of the negative consequences of the
growing US bioethanol industry In 2006
Mexicans took to the streets to protest at the
high price of tortillas (a corn bread staple) made
more expensive by demand for maize from USA
bioethanol producers
In 2007 the UN World Food Programme which
fghts famine in Africa announced that it could
no longer afford to maintain its current level of
support due to high commodity prices Its food
purchasing costs rose by almost 50 between
2002 and 2007 854 million23 people suffer from
hunger and this is increasing by an average of
4 million a year at current trends Increasing
food prices will mean that even more people will
depend on food aid
Land is a fnite resource
Some biofuels are much more land
effcient than others because of
higher feedstock yields per hectare and
more effcient production processes (see graphic
10) If we are to feed a growing population using
the fnite amount of agricultural land available
it is vital that governments choose to promote
biofuels that deliver the maximum possible
energy per hectare
First-generation biofuels
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from non-tropical
feedstocks (rape wheat and corn) are not land
effcient It would require a minimum of 26 of
the worldrsquos arable land to run just 20 of its cars
on these fuels
[11] GlobAl iMPAcTS AND uNiNTeNDeD coNSeQueNceS
In the past farmers have increased production
to meet growing demands But they are now
fnding it hard to keep up ndash in three of the four
years20 between 2003 and 2007 demand for
grains to feed people and livestock outstripped
supply As countries such as China and India
develop more people can afford meat and dairy
products This is driving up demand for agricultural
commodities The booming biofuels industry is
contributing further to this escalation in demand
First-generation biofuels compete with food
crops leading to rising food prices In future this
could jeopardise the worldrsquos ability to feed its
growing population Many other industries also
rely on raw materials like palm oil which are
being diverted to biofuel production
Increased demand higher prices
The biofuels industry is using an
increasing share of the worldrsquos food
crops (see graphic 9) which is driving
up prices Global food prices rose by 1021 in
2006 due to an increase in corn wheat and soya
bean oil prices Prices are predicted to rise by
20ndash5022 over the next decade (compared with
average levels over the last ten years)
Demand for biofuel feedstock increases prices
of other crops For example high demand for
corn to make bioethanol means US farmers are
producing less soya and wheat which is boosting
prices for those crops Biofuels are also raising
meat and dairy prices by pushing up the price of
animal feed
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from palm oil
and sugarcane are more land effcient but
there is limited potential to expand production
of the feedstocks without causing signifcant
environmental damage through loss of natural
forests and grasslands
Second-generation biofuels
To run 20 of the worldrsquos vehicles on second-
generation biofuels would require 7 of its
arable land The feedstocks for these fuels can
also be grown on other types of land such as
pastures and forests
Trade
Even at todayrsquos high oil prices most
biofuels cannot compete on cost with
petrol and diesel Biofuel producers
rely on government subsidies for their profts
Governments are beginning to set mandatory
targets to stimulate investment and demand
for biofuels This is further boosting the price
of agricultural commodities and contributing to
trade distortions
In Brazil a well-established biofuel industry and
low production costs means Brazilian bioethanol
is cost competitive with petrol and diesel The
EU and the USA have set trade barriers to
protect domestic biofuel industries from cheap
Brazilian bioethanol imports This is encouraging
the development of less cost-effective and less
sustainable biofuels This makes it more diffcult
for those developing countries that are better
suited to biofuels production to compete on
world markets
Many governments have proposed mandatory
biofuel targets that exceed their countryrsquos
production and land capacity In future this
could make these countries dependent on
foreign imports which will undermine their
energy security Commodity prices will continue
to rise as competition increases for limited
global supplies
unintended consequences Biofuels could help boost rural development while reducing CO2 emissions and reliance on crude oil But if biofuel strategies are not fully evaluated they could do more harm than good stimulating poor performing biofuels and stifing innovation
CO2 performance
Biofuels can help fght climate change
but CO2 savings vary signifcantly
between fuels (see graphic 5)
This is because the amount of energy needed
to produce different feedstocks (type of
crop and where it is grown) and to process
them into fuels varies considerably For
example using US corn it takes 06ndash08
litres of fossil fuels to produce an amount of
bioethanol equivalent to 1 litre of mineral
oil whereas it takes less than 01 litres of
fossil fuels to produce the same amount of
bioethanol using Brazilian sugarcane15
[5] co2 ReDucTioN of biofuelS coMPAReD WiTh foSSil fuelS ()
Biomass to liquid Bioethanol Fossil (2nd generation) (corn) fuel
Bioethanol USA
(wheat) EU 100
87 100
lt10 30
40-60
10
Bioethanol Biodiesel (sugarcane) (rapeseed)
Brazil EU
Source IEA Energy Technology Perspective 2006
Second-generation biofuels produce even
less CO2 as their feedstocks require fewer
agricultural inputs and production processes
are much more effcient
Biofuels cost more than petrol or diesel per
unit of energy because of the high cost of
feedstocks and production Using biodiesel
and bioethanol from crops grown in Europe
[6] biofuelS SAviNGS biofuels cost per tonne GhG reduction ($ per tonne co2 equivalent)
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Bioethanol (corn)
Bioethanol (grain)
Bioethanol (cellulose) 2002
Biodiesel Post 2010 (rapeseed)
Biodiesel (biomass)
-50 0 200 400 600 800
Source IEA Biofuels for transportation An international perspective 2004
and the USA as a carbon reduction strategy
will cost around $200-$250 per tonne of
CO2 avoided at 2004 prices The cost of
bioethanol from sugarcane as in Brazil
can be comparable to that of fossil fuels
(see graphic 6) Bioethanol from cellulose
(a second-generation biofuel) could already
provide CO2 reductions at less than $200 a
tonne It is likely to remain expensive to
reduce CO2 using biodiesel and bioethanol
from US and European crops even after
2010 The cost of using second-generation
biofuels could come down to under $100 a
tonne with large-scale production
As more governments encourage the use of
biofuels and set mandatory targets demand
will outstrip supply leading to higher prices
for frst- and second-generation biofuels
Deforestation and land-use change
The demand for soya and palm oil
threatens rainforests in Brazil
Indonesia and Malaysia which
are being cleared for plantations These oils
are used by a number of industries but the
growth in biodiesel production is increasing
demand signifcantly
[7] RAiNfoReST DefoReSTATioN iMPAcTS carbon storage and co2 emissions per hectare in Se Asia
230 830 48 tonnes tonnes tonnes carbon CO2 carbon
Rainforest Deforestation Palm plantations Carbon stored Carbon released as Stores only 20 of above ground CO2 due to clearing carbon per hectare
and burning compared to rain-forest (equivalent to
165 tonnes CO2)
Sources see back page
Rainforests store large amounts of carbon
above ground and in the soil which is
released when they are cleared (see
graphic 7) A much smaller amount of carbon
is absorbed by the plantations which replace
the forests This means biofuels grown in
tropical countries can contribute more to
climate change than fossil fuels when their
land-use impact is taken into account
Studies have shown that biodiesel made from
palm oil produces three16 to ten17 times more
CO2 than an equivalent amount of fossil
fuel The situation is even worse for biodiesel
made from soya as the crop yields less oil
and stores less carbon than palm plantations
Peat lands wetlands and grasslands also
release large amounts of carbon if converted
to agricultural use Most biodiesel is made
from rapeseed oil rather than palm oil and
soya bean oil But as an increasing share of
rapeseed oil is used for fuels rather than for
food more soya and palm is being planted
to compensate
Deforestation and land-use change means
that while biofuels can appear to help
governments meet their national greenhouse
gas emissions reduction targets they could in
reality be more damaging to climate change
globally when land-use impact is considered
This means that it is vital for national policies
to take into account the full life-cycle climate
impact of different biofuels
Biodiversity loss
The destruction of tropical forests
and grasslands to make way for
soya and palm plantations causes
signifcant destruction of plant and animal
species including endangered species such
as the orang-utan
Biofuel feedstocks are often grown as a
single crop over a wide area Known as
monoculture this brings high yields but
harms biodiversity These impacts can be
reduced to an extent through mixed planting
and leaving wild areas
Water scarcity
Both frst and second-generation
biofuels require large amounts of
water to grow and process the
feedstocks For example it takes between
Sources FOLicht UN
Sustainability criteria
The social and environmental impacts
of biofuels vary considerably
depending on the type of feedstock
used where it is grown and the processes
needed to turn it into biofuels
Sustainability criteria are required to provide
confdence in the labelling and identifcation
of specifc types of biofuel The criteria should
100
[5] co2 ReDucTioN of biofuelS coMPAReD WiTh foSSil fuelS ()
Source IEA Energy Technology Perspective 2006
Bioethanol (corn) USA
Bioethanol (wheat)
EU
Biomass to liquid(2nd generation)
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Brazil
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
EU
Fossil fuel
lt10 40-6087
100
1030
[7] RAiNfoReST DefoReSTATioN iMPAcTScarbon storage and co2 emissions per hectare in Se Asia
Sources see back page
RainforestCarbon stored above ground
230tonnescarbon
DeforestationCarbon released as CO2 due to clearing
and burning
830tonnes
CO2
Palm plantationsStores only 20 of carbon per hectare compared to rain-
forest (equivalent to 165 tonnes CO2)
48tonnescarbon
[6] biofuelS SAviNGSbiofuels cost per tonne GhG reduction ($ per tonne co2 equivalent)
Source IEA Biofuels for transportation An international perspective 2004
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Bioethanol (corn)
Bioethanol (grain)
Bioethanol (cellulose)
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
Biodiesel (biomass)
0 200 400 600 800-50
2002Post 2010
cover the lifecycle CO2 emissions and impacts
on natural habitats as well as socio-economic
factors such as the availability of food for the
local population where feedstocks are produced
In 2007 the Dutch Government announced
sustainability criteria and has proposed a system
to enable traceability of feedstocks by 2020
The UK Government has proposed that 80 of
biofuels meet sustainability standards including
CO2 reduction requirements by 2010ndash11 The
EU is developing sustainability criteria
Business is also developing sustainability
standards through initiatives such as the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (chaired by
Unilever) and the Roundtable on Sustainable
Biofuels The latter aims to launch draft
sustainability standards in early 2008
USATARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2030 30 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
11800000 tonnes
USA accounts for 15 of global biodiesel production
ChinaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 15 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
800000 tonnes
China has imposed a moratorium on projects making bioethanol fuel from corn and other basic food crops
BrazilTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2010 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
12900000 tonnes
IndiaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 20 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
240000 tonnes
EUTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
730000 tonnes
Europe accounts for 85 of global biodiesel production
Reduction in US land used for food crops pushes production elsewhere potentially causing deforestation
Brazil sugarcane and soybean
European demand for biodiesel feedstock raises palm oil price causing deforestation
Europe doesnrsquot have enough land to meet its biofuels targets and will be dependent on imports
USA corn wheat and soybean
Bioethanol production has pushed up corn prices sparking protests in Mexico
The worldrsquos poorest are already being affected by higher food prices
98 of Indonesiarsquos natural rainforest will be degraded or gone by 2022
KEY
Issues with food security
Issues with GHGs
Issues with sustainability
Issues with trade
Areas of tropical rainforest
Trade
Unintended consequences
Feedstocks
Europe rapeseed oil and wheat
The unilever positionUnilever supports sustainable biofuels that deliver social and environmental benefts across their entire lifecycle
Unilever supports renewable energy
initiatives that deliver benefts on a lifecycle
basis helping to combat climate change and
reduce dependency on fossil fuels Around
17 of the energy we use for our operations
comes from renewable sources
Why the issue matters to Unilever
Two-thirds of the raw materials we use
come from agriculture These materials are
essential to our business and Unilever has
a clear interest in how they are grown and
in securing future supplies That is why
we have worked to improve the social and
environmental standards of agriculture
for more than a decade Our sustainable
agriculture programmes include palm oil
oilseed rape sunfowers spinach tomatoes
and tea We are also a member of several
sustainability initiatives including the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil
Demand for biofuels feedstock has already
reduced the availability of raw materials and
driven up prices We are concerned that
increased demand will destabilise world
food supply and undermine sustainable
agriculture Use of vegetable oils such as
rapeseed oil for biofuels could also create
shortages driving consumers to less healthy
animal fats
Lifecycle analysis
Unilever believes that individual biofuels
should be examined carefully to ensure
that the unintended environmental
(deforestation and biodiversity loss) and
socio-economic (food security) consequences
do not undermine the positive impacts
Biofuels must also be evaluated across their
lifecycle to achieve genuine greenhouse gas
(GHG) reductions
Biomass is a valuable resource Using it
to generate heat and electricity is a more
effcient and cost-effective way of reducing
CO2 emissions than using it to make
transport fuels24 New vehicle technologies
such as electric and hybrid and more
effcient engines offer signifcant scope
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
from transport
First-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that some frst-generation
biofuels are neither environmentally effcient
nor cost-effective ways to reduce emissions
Many studies have shown that several frst-
generation biofuels have poor performance
with regard to reducing GHG emissions and
dependency on fossil fuels Some even cause
more GHG emissions than the fossil fuels
they replace25
We are concerned that the use of valuable
food crops for energy purposes will increase
pressure on ecosystems and biodiversity
Deforestation particularly to make way for
palm oil and soya beans could lead to the
devastation of the last remaining rainforests
in Borneo and the Amazon region
Second-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that the development
of second-generation biofuels that donrsquot
compete with food crops and have low
carbon emissions is essential The mainstream
market introduction of second-generation
biofuels would provide a strong incentive
for the application of renewable energy
technologies while minimising the negative
repercussions on food markets and food
security Unilever believes there is a strong
case for government and business investment
in new technologies and further research on
the sustainable use of biomass Support for
second-generation biofuels could be
accelerated through
n RampD facilitation and technology transfer
n Tax exemption andor subsidies
n Phasing out support for poor performing
frst-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels should be
required to achieve at least 50 GHG
savings compared to fossil fuels
Assessing sustainability
We believe governments worldwide have
the responsibility to subject their biofuel
policies to a full impact assessment These
assessments should cover environmental
social and economic impacts from the
regions of production to the end use
Policies which aim to reduce GHG emissions
should contain full lifecycle assessments for
individual biofuels This should ensure that
change in land use is included in the carbon
balance We propose that government
targets should be based on CO2 reductions
rather than volume as well as on availability
of feedstocks
Sustainability standards
Unilever believes sustainability criteria should
be introduced for the use of biomass within
energy programmes These should include
criteria at the production level as well as
criteria at a macro-level such as overall GHG
balance and energy effciency food security
and the protection of biodiversity and
ecosystems The use of biomass for energy
should not be stimulated by government
programmes without the application of
transparent sustainability criteria Proceeding
without these safeguards will risk unintended
consequences that could result in worse
climate change impacts natural habitat loss
and disruption of staple food supplies
unintended consequencesBiofuels could help boost rural development while reducing CO2 emissions and reliance on crude oil But if biofuel strategies are not fully evaluated they could do more harm than good stimulating poor performing biofuels and stifing innovation
CO2 performance
Biofuels can help fght climate change
but CO2 savings vary signifcantly
between fuels (see graphic 5)
This is because the amount of energy needed
to produce different feedstocks (type of
crop and where it is grown) and to process
them into fuels varies considerably For
example using US corn it takes 06ndash08
litres of fossil fuels to produce an amount of
bioethanol equivalent to 1 litre of mineral
oil whereas it takes less than 01 litres of
fossil fuels to produce the same amount of
bioethanol using Brazilian sugarcane15
[11] GlobAl iMPAcTS AND uNiNTeNDeD coNSeQueNceS
Second-generation biofuels produce even
less CO2 as their feedstocks require fewer
agricultural inputs and production processes
are much more effcient
Biofuels cost more than petrol or diesel per
unit of energy because of the high cost of
feedstocks and production Using biodiesel
and bioethanol from crops grown in Europe
and the USA as a carbon reduction strategy
will cost around $200-$250 per tonne of
CO2 avoided at 2004 prices The cost of
bioethanol from sugarcane as in Brazil
can be comparable to that of fossil fuels
(see graphic 6) Bioethanol from cellulose
(a second-generation biofuel) could already
provide CO2 reductions at less than $200 a
tonne It is likely to remain expensive to
reduce CO2 using biodiesel and bioethanol
from US and European crops even after
2010 The cost of using second-generation
biofuels could come down to under $100 a
tonne with large-scale production
As more governments encourage the use of
biofuels and set mandatory targets demand
will outstrip supply leading to higher prices
for frst- and second-generation biofuels
Deforestation and land-use change
The demand for soya and palm oil
threatens rainforests in Brazil
Indonesia and Malaysia which
are being cleared for plantations These oils
are used by a number of industries but the
growth in biodiesel production is increasing
demand signifcantly
Rainforests store large amounts of carbon
above ground and in the soil which is
released when they are cleared (see
graphic 7) A much smaller amount of carbon
is absorbed by the plantations which replace
the forests This means biofuels grown in
tropical countries can contribute more to
climate change than fossil fuels when their
land-use impact is taken into account
Studies have shown that biodiesel made from
palm oil produces three16 to ten17 times more
CO2 than an equivalent amount of fossil
fuel The situation is even worse for biodiesel
made from soya as the crop yields less oil
and stores less carbon than palm plantations
Peat lands wetlands and grasslands also
release large amounts of carbon if converted
to agricultural use Most biodiesel is made
from rapeseed oil rather than palm oil and
soya bean oil But as an increasing share of
rapeseed oil is used for fuels rather than for
food more soya and palm is being planted
to compensate
Deforestation and land-use change means
that while biofuels can appear to help
governments meet their national greenhouse
gas emissions reduction targets they could in
reality be more damaging to climate change
globally when land-use impact is considered
This means that it is vital for national policies
to take into account the full life-cycle climate
impact of different biofuels
Biodiversity loss
The destruction of tropical forests
and grasslands to make way for
soya and palm plantations causes
signifcant destruction of plant and animal
species including endangered species such
as the orang-utan
Biofuel feedstocks are often grown as a
single crop over a wide area Known as
monoculture this brings high yields but
harms biodiversity These impacts can be
reduced to an extent through mixed planting
and leaving wild areas
Water scarcity
Both frst and second-generation
biofuels require large amounts of
water to grow and process the
feedstocks For example it takes between
1500 and 4600 litres of water18 to produce [9] PRoPoRTioN of cRoP uSeD foR biofuelS () [10] biofuelS eNeRGY DeliveRY just one litre of bioethanol There are already
Brazil sugarcane USA corn (x 1000 litres of diesel equivalent per hectare)
water shortages in many regions and population Biodiesel Bioethanol
growth and climate change will further increase (rapeseed oil) (sugar cane)
competition for clean water and increase its cost 70 50
Land-use and food availability
The worldrsquos population is rapidly
increasing and is expected to exceed
9 billion19 by 2050 To feed this
growing population will require 50 more food
in the next 20 years
[8] PRoJecTeD GRoWTh iN fooD coNSuMPTioN
Oil and oilseed meals
150 -
140 -Sugar Meat
130 -Cereals Dairy
120 -
110 -
100 -
2004 2009 2014 2019
Source OECD-FAO 2006
In the past farmers have increased production
to meet growing demands But they are now
fnding it hard to keep up ndash in three of the four
years20 between 2003 and 2007 demand for
grains to feed people and livestock outstripped
supply As countries such as China and India
develop more people can afford meat and dairy
products This is driving up demand for agricultural
commodities The booming biofuels industry is
contributing further to this escalation in demand
First-generation biofuels compete with food
crops leading to rising food prices In future this
could jeopardise the worldrsquos ability to feed its
growing population Many other industries also
rely on raw materials like palm oil which are
being diverted to biofuel production
Increased demand higher prices
The biofuels industry is using an
increasing share of the worldrsquos food
crops (see graphic 9) which is driving
up prices Global food prices rose by 1021 in
2006 due to an increase in corn wheat and soya
bean oil prices Prices are predicted to rise by
20ndash5022 over the next decade (compared with
average levels over the last ten years)
Demand for biofuel feedstock increases prices
of other crops For example high demand for
corn to make bioethanol means US farmers are
producing less soya and wheat which is boosting
prices for those crops Biofuels are also raising
meat and dairy prices by pushing up the price of
animal feed
39 43 20
45
1995 2005 2015 1995 2005 2015
EU cereals EU rapeseed
90
60
20
0 16 lt15 1995 2005 20151995 2005 2015
Source The German Marshall Fund of the USA
While higher food prices will beneft some
producers they negatively impact the economies
of food-importing countries Poor people who
spend a large proportion of their income on
food will suffer disproportionately compared
with the wealthy Mexico has already experienced
some of the negative consequences of the
growing US bioethanol industry In 2006
Mexicans took to the streets to protest at the
high price of tortillas (a corn bread staple) made
more expensive by demand for maize from USA
bioethanol producers
In 2007 the UN World Food Programme which
fghts famine in Africa announced that it could
no longer afford to maintain its current level of
support due to high commodity prices Its food
purchasing costs rose by almost 50 between
2002 and 2007 854 million23 people suffer from
hunger and this is increasing by an average of
4 million a year at current trends Increasing
food prices will mean that even more people will
depend on food aid
Land is a fnite resource
Some biofuels are much more land
effcient than others because of
higher feedstock yields per hectare and
more effcient production processes (see graphic
10) If we are to feed a growing population using
the fnite amount of agricultural land available
it is vital that governments choose to promote
biofuels that deliver the maximum possible
energy per hectare
First-generation biofuels
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from non-tropical
feedstocks (rape wheat and corn) are not land
effcient It would require a minimum of 26 of
the worldrsquos arable land to run just 20 of its cars
on these fuels
104 405 13 25
Bioethanol Biomass- Biomethane (wheat) to-liquid (energy crops)
1st generation biofuel 2nd generation biofuel
Source FNR
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from palm oil
and sugarcane are more land effcient but
there is limited potential to expand production
of the feedstocks without causing signifcant
environmental damage through loss of natural
forests and grasslands
Second-generation biofuels
To run 20 of the worldrsquos vehicles on second-
generation biofuels would require 7 of its
arable land The feedstocks for these fuels can
also be grown on other types of land such as
pastures and forests
Trade
Even at todayrsquos high oil prices most
biofuels cannot compete on cost with
petrol and diesel Biofuel producers
rely on government subsidies for their profts
Governments are beginning to set mandatory
targets to stimulate investment and demand
for biofuels This is further boosting the price
of agricultural commodities and contributing to
trade distortions
In Brazil a well-established biofuel industry and
low production costs means Brazilian bioethanol
is cost competitive with petrol and diesel The
EU and the USA have set trade barriers to
protect domestic biofuel industries from cheap
Brazilian bioethanol imports This is encouraging
the development of less cost-effective and less
sustainable biofuels This makes it more diffcult
for those developing countries that are better
suited to biofuels production to compete on
world markets
Many governments have proposed mandatory
biofuel targets that exceed their countryrsquos
production and land capacity In future this
could make these countries dependent on
foreign imports which will undermine their
energy security Commodity prices will continue
to rise as competition increases for limited
global supplies
[10] biofuelS eNeRGY DeliveRY(x 1000 litres of diesel equivalent per hectare)
Source FNR
1013 25
4054
Biomethane(energy crops)
Biomass- to-liquid
Bioethanol(wheat)
Biodiesel(rapeseed oil)
Bioethanol(sugar cane)
100
[5] co2 ReDucTioN of biofuelS coMPAReD WiTh foSSil fuelS ()
Source IEA Energy Technology Perspective 2006
Bioethanol (corn) USA
Bioethanol (wheat)
EU
Biomass to liquid(2nd generation)
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Brazil
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
EU
Fossil fuel
lt10 40-6087
100
1030
[7] RAiNfoReST DefoReSTATioN iMPAcTScarbon storage and co2 emissions per hectare in Se Asia
Sources see back page
RainforestCarbon stored above ground
230tonnescarbon
DeforestationCarbon released as CO2 due to clearing
and burning
830tonnes
CO2
Palm plantationsStores only 20 of carbon per hectare compared to rain-
forest (equivalent to 165 tonnes CO2)
48tonnescarbon
[6] biofuelS SAviNGSbiofuels cost per tonne GhG reduction ($ per tonne co2 equivalent)
Source IEA Biofuels for transportation An international perspective 2004
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Bioethanol (corn)
Bioethanol (grain)
Bioethanol (cellulose)
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
Biodiesel (biomass)
0 200 400 600 800-50
2002Post 2010
[8] PRoJecTeD GRoWTh iN fooD coNSuMPTioN
Source OECD-FAO 2006
-
-
-
-
-
-
2004 2009 2014 2019
100
110
120
130
140
150 Oil and oilseed meals
SugarMeat
CerealsDairy
1st generation biofuel 2nd generation biofuel
90
2015
2015
[9] PRoPoRTioN of cRoP uSeD foR biofuelS ()
Source The German Marshall Fund of the USA
Brazil sugarcane USA corn
EU rapeseedEU cereals
1995 1995
19951995
2005 2005
20052005
2015
2015
39
45
lt15
20
60
43
16
70
20
0
50
The unilever positionUnilever supports sustainable biofuels that deliver social and environmental benefts across their entire lifecycle
Unilever supports renewable energy
initiatives that deliver benefts on a lifecycle
basis helping to combat climate change and
reduce dependency on fossil fuels Around
17 of the energy we use for our operations
comes from renewable sources
Why the issue matters to Unilever
Two-thirds of the raw materials we use
come from agriculture These materials are
essential to our business and Unilever has
a clear interest in how they are grown and
in securing future supplies That is why
we have worked to improve the social and
environmental standards of agriculture
for more than a decade Our sustainable
agriculture programmes include palm oil
oilseed rape sunfowers spinach tomatoes
and tea We are also a member of several
sustainability initiatives including the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil
Demand for biofuels feedstock has already
reduced the availability of raw materials and
driven up prices We are concerned that
increased demand will destabilise world
food supply and undermine sustainable
agriculture Use of vegetable oils such as
rapeseed oil for biofuels could also create
shortages driving consumers to less healthy
animal fats
Lifecycle analysis
Unilever believes that individual biofuels
should be examined carefully to ensure
that the unintended environmental
(deforestation and biodiversity loss) and
socio-economic (food security) consequences
do not undermine the positive impacts
Biofuels must also be evaluated across their
lifecycle to achieve genuine greenhouse gas
(GHG) reductions
Biomass is a valuable resource Using it
to generate heat and electricity is a more
effcient and cost-effective way of reducing
CO2 emissions than using it to make
transport fuels24 New vehicle technologies
such as electric and hybrid and more
effcient engines offer signifcant scope
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
from transport
First-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that some frst-generation
biofuels are neither environmentally effcient
nor cost-effective ways to reduce emissions
Many studies have shown that several frst-
generation biofuels have poor performance
with regard to reducing GHG emissions and
dependency on fossil fuels Some even cause
more GHG emissions than the fossil fuels
they replace25
We are concerned that the use of valuable
food crops for energy purposes will increase
pressure on ecosystems and biodiversity
Deforestation particularly to make way for
palm oil and soya beans could lead to the
devastation of the last remaining rainforests
in Borneo and the Amazon region
Second-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that the development
of second-generation biofuels that donrsquot
compete with food crops and have low
carbon emissions is essential The mainstream
market introduction of second-generation
biofuels would provide a strong incentive
for the application of renewable energy
technologies while minimising the negative
repercussions on food markets and food
security Unilever believes there is a strong
case for government and business investment
in new technologies and further research on
the sustainable use of biomass Support for
second-generation biofuels could be
accelerated through
n RampD facilitation and technology transfer
n Tax exemption andor subsidies
n Phasing out support for poor performing
frst-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels should be
required to achieve at least 50 GHG
savings compared to fossil fuels
Assessing sustainability
We believe governments worldwide have
the responsibility to subject their biofuel
policies to a full impact assessment These
assessments should cover environmental
social and economic impacts from the
regions of production to the end use
Policies which aim to reduce GHG emissions
should contain full lifecycle assessments for
individual biofuels This should ensure that
change in land use is included in the carbon
balance We propose that government
targets should be based on CO2 reductions
rather than volume as well as on availability
of feedstocks
Sustainability standards
Unilever believes sustainability criteria should
be introduced for the use of biomass within
energy programmes These should include
criteria at the production level as well as
criteria at a macro-level such as overall GHG
balance and energy effciency food security
and the protection of biodiversity and
ecosystems The use of biomass for energy
should not be stimulated by government
programmes without the application of
transparent sustainability criteria Proceeding
without these safeguards will risk unintended
consequences that could result in worse
climate change impacts natural habitat loss
and disruption of staple food supplies
unintended consequencesBiofuels could help boost rural development while reducing CO2 emissions and reliance on crude oil But if biofuel strategies are not fully evaluated they could do more harm than good stimulating poor performing biofuels and stifing innovation
CO2 performance
Biofuels can help fght climate change
but CO2 savings vary signifcantly
between fuels (see graphic 5)
This is because the amount of energy needed
to produce different feedstocks (type of
crop and where it is grown) and to process
them into fuels varies considerably For
example using US corn it takes 06ndash08
litres of fossil fuels to produce an amount of
bioethanol equivalent to 1 litre of mineral
oil whereas it takes less than 01 litres of
fossil fuels to produce the same amount of
bioethanol using Brazilian sugarcane15
1500 and 4600 litres of water18 to produce
just one litre of bioethanol There are already
water shortages in many regions and population
growth and climate change will further increase
competition for clean water and increase its cost
Land-use and food availability
The worldrsquos population is rapidly
increasing and is expected to exceed
9 billion19 by 2050 To feed this
growing population will require 50 more food
in the next 20 years
While higher food prices will beneft some
producers they negatively impact the economies
of food-importing countries Poor people who
spend a large proportion of their income on
food will suffer disproportionately compared
with the wealthy Mexico has already experienced
some of the negative consequences of the
growing US bioethanol industry In 2006
Mexicans took to the streets to protest at the
high price of tortillas (a corn bread staple) made
more expensive by demand for maize from USA
bioethanol producers
In 2007 the UN World Food Programme which
fghts famine in Africa announced that it could
no longer afford to maintain its current level of
support due to high commodity prices Its food
purchasing costs rose by almost 50 between
2002 and 2007 854 million23 people suffer from
hunger and this is increasing by an average of
4 million a year at current trends Increasing
food prices will mean that even more people will
depend on food aid
Land is a fnite resource
Some biofuels are much more land
effcient than others because of
higher feedstock yields per hectare and
more effcient production processes (see graphic
10) If we are to feed a growing population using
the fnite amount of agricultural land available
it is vital that governments choose to promote
biofuels that deliver the maximum possible
energy per hectare
First-generation biofuels
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from non-tropical
feedstocks (rape wheat and corn) are not land
effcient It would require a minimum of 26 of
the worldrsquos arable land to run just 20 of its cars
on these fuels
Second-generation biofuels produce even
less CO2 as their feedstocks require fewer
agricultural inputs and production processes
are much more effcient
Biofuels cost more than petrol or diesel per
unit of energy because of the high cost of
feedstocks and production Using biodiesel
and bioethanol from crops grown in Europe
and the USA as a carbon reduction strategy
will cost around $200-$250 per tonne of
CO2 avoided at 2004 prices The cost of
bioethanol from sugarcane as in Brazil
can be comparable to that of fossil fuels
(see graphic 6) Bioethanol from cellulose
(a second-generation biofuel) could already
provide CO2 reductions at less than $200 a
tonne It is likely to remain expensive to
reduce CO2 using biodiesel and bioethanol
from US and European crops even after
2010 The cost of using second-generation
biofuels could come down to under $100 a
tonne with large-scale production
As more governments encourage the use of
biofuels and set mandatory targets demand
will outstrip supply leading to higher prices
for frst- and second-generation biofuels
Deforestation and land-use change
The demand for soya and palm oil
threatens rainforests in Brazil
Indonesia and Malaysia which
are being cleared for plantations These oils
are used by a number of industries but the
growth in biodiesel production is increasing
demand signifcantly
Rainforests store large amounts of carbon
above ground and in the soil which is
released when they are cleared (see
graphic 7) A much smaller amount of carbon
is absorbed by the plantations which replace
the forests This means biofuels grown in
tropical countries can contribute more to
climate change than fossil fuels when their
land-use impact is taken into account
Studies have shown that biodiesel made from
palm oil produces three16 to ten17 times more
CO2 than an equivalent amount of fossil
fuel The situation is even worse for biodiesel
made from soya as the crop yields less oil
and stores less carbon than palm plantations
Peat lands wetlands and grasslands also
release large amounts of carbon if converted
to agricultural use Most biodiesel is made
from rapeseed oil rather than palm oil and
soya bean oil But as an increasing share of
rapeseed oil is used for fuels rather than for
food more soya and palm is being planted
to compensate
Deforestation and land-use change means
that while biofuels can appear to help
governments meet their national greenhouse
gas emissions reduction targets they could in
reality be more damaging to climate change
globally when land-use impact is considered
This means that it is vital for national policies
to take into account the full life-cycle climate
impact of different biofuels
Biodiversity loss
The destruction of tropical forests
and grasslands to make way for
soya and palm plantations causes
signifcant destruction of plant and animal
species including endangered species such
as the orang-utan
Biofuel feedstocks are often grown as a
single crop over a wide area Known as
monoculture this brings high yields but
harms biodiversity These impacts can be
reduced to an extent through mixed planting
and leaving wild areas
Water scarcity
Both frst and second-generation
biofuels require large amounts of
water to grow and process the
feedstocks For example it takes between
In the past farmers have increased production
to meet growing demands But they are now
fnding it hard to keep up ndash in three of the four
years20 between 2003 and 2007 demand for
grains to feed people and livestock outstripped
supply As countries such as China and India
develop more people can afford meat and dairy
products This is driving up demand for agricultural
commodities The booming biofuels industry is
contributing further to this escalation in demand
First-generation biofuels compete with food
crops leading to rising food prices In future this
could jeopardise the worldrsquos ability to feed its
growing population Many other industries also
rely on raw materials like palm oil which are
being diverted to biofuel production
Increased demand higher prices
The biofuels industry is using an
increasing share of the worldrsquos food
crops (see graphic 9) which is driving
up prices Global food prices rose by 1021 in
2006 due to an increase in corn wheat and soya
bean oil prices Prices are predicted to rise by
20ndash5022 over the next decade (compared with
average levels over the last ten years)
Demand for biofuel feedstock increases prices
of other crops For example high demand for
corn to make bioethanol means US farmers are
producing less soya and wheat which is boosting
prices for those crops Biofuels are also raising
meat and dairy prices by pushing up the price of
animal feed
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from palm oil
and sugarcane are more land effcient but
there is limited potential to expand production
of the feedstocks without causing signifcant
environmental damage through loss of natural
forests and grasslands
Second-generation biofuels
To run 20 of the worldrsquos vehicles on second-
generation biofuels would require 7 of its
arable land The feedstocks for these fuels can
also be grown on other types of land such as
pastures and forests
Trade
Even at todayrsquos high oil prices most
biofuels cannot compete on cost with
petrol and diesel Biofuel producers
rely on government subsidies for their profts
Governments are beginning to set mandatory
targets to stimulate investment and demand
for biofuels This is further boosting the price
of agricultural commodities and contributing to
trade distortions
In Brazil a well-established biofuel industry and
low production costs means Brazilian bioethanol
is cost competitive with petrol and diesel The
EU and the USA have set trade barriers to
protect domestic biofuel industries from cheap
Brazilian bioethanol imports This is encouraging
the development of less cost-effective and less
sustainable biofuels This makes it more diffcult
for those developing countries that are better
suited to biofuels production to compete on
world markets
Many governments have proposed mandatory
biofuel targets that exceed their countryrsquos
production and land capacity In future this
could make these countries dependent on
foreign imports which will undermine their
energy security Commodity prices will continue
to rise as competition increases for limited
global supplies
[11] GlobAl iMPAcTS AND uNiNTeNDeD coNSeQueNceS
USA TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2030 30 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
11800000 tonnes
USA accounts for 15 of global biodiesel production
EU TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
730000 tonnes
Europe accounts for 85 of global biodiesel production
China TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 15 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
800000 tonnes
China has imposed a moratorium on projects making bioethanol fuel from corn and other basic food crops
USA corn wheat and soybean
Reduction in US land Bioethanol production used for food crops has pushed up corn pushes production prices sparking elsewhere potentially protests in Mexico causing deforestation
Europe doesnrsquot have enough land to meet its biofuels targets Europe rapeseed oil and wheatand will be dependent on imports
The worldrsquos poorest are already being affected by higher food prices
Brazil sugarcane and soybean
KEY
Issues with food security
Issues with GHGs
Issues with sustainability
Issues with trade
Feedstocks
Areas of tropical rainforest
Trade
Unintended consequences
Sustainability criteria
The social and environmental impacts
of biofuels vary considerably
depending on the type of feedstock
used where it is grown and the processes
needed to turn it into biofuels
Sustainability criteria are required to provide
confdence in the labelling and identifcation
of specifc types of biofuel The criteria should
Brazil TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2010 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
12900000 tonnes
cover the lifecycle CO2 emissions and impacts
on natural habitats as well as socio-economic
factors such as the availability of food for the
local population where feedstocks are produced
In 2007 the Dutch Government announced
sustainability criteria and has proposed a system
to enable traceability of feedstocks by 2020
The UK Government has proposed that 80 of
biofuels meet sustainability standards including
European demand for biodiesel feedstock
98 of Indonesiarsquos raises palm oil price natural rainforest will causing deforestation be degraded or gone by 2022
India TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 20 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
240000 tonnes
Sources FOLicht UN
CO2 reduction requirements by 2010ndash11 The
EU is developing sustainability criteria
Business is also developing sustainability
standards through initiatives such as the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (chaired by
Unilever) and the Roundtable on Sustainable
Biofuels The latter aims to launch draft
sustainability standards in early 2008
Sources FOLicht UN
[10] biofuelS eNeRGY DeliveRY(x 1000 litres of diesel equivalent per hectare)
Source FNR
1013 25
4054
Biomethane(energy crops)
Biomass- to-liquid
Bioethanol(wheat)
Biodiesel(rapeseed oil)
Bioethanol(sugar cane)
Sustainability criteria
The social and environmental impacts
of biofuels vary considerably
depending on the type of feedstock
used where it is grown and the processes
needed to turn it into biofuels
Sustainability criteria are required to provide
confdence in the labelling and identifcation
of specifc types of biofuel The criteria should
100
[5] co2 ReDucTioN of biofuelS coMPAReD WiTh foSSil fuelS ()
Source IEA Energy Technology Perspective 2006
Bioethanol (corn) USA
Bioethanol (wheat)
EU
Biomass to liquid(2nd generation)
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Brazil
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
EU
Fossil fuel
lt10 40-6087
100
1030
[7] RAiNfoReST DefoReSTATioN iMPAcTScarbon storage and co2 emissions per hectare in Se Asia
Sources see back page
RainforestCarbon stored above ground
230tonnescarbon
DeforestationCarbon released as CO2 due to clearing
and burning
830tonnes
CO2
Palm plantationsStores only 20 of carbon per hectare compared to rain-
forest (equivalent to 165 tonnes CO2)
48tonnescarbon
[6] biofuelS SAviNGSbiofuels cost per tonne GhG reduction ($ per tonne co2 equivalent)
Source IEA Biofuels for transportation An international perspective 2004
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Bioethanol (corn)
Bioethanol (grain)
Bioethanol (cellulose)
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
Biodiesel (biomass)
0 200 400 600 800-50
2002Post 2010
[8] PRoJecTeD GRoWTh iN fooD coNSuMPTioN
Source OECD-FAO 2006
-
-
-
-
-
-
2004 2009 2014 2019
100
110
120
130
140
150 Oil and oilseed meals
SugarMeat
CerealsDairy
1st generation biofuel 2nd generation biofuel
cover the lifecycle CO2 emissions and impacts
on natural habitats as well as socio-economic
factors such as the availability of food for the
local population where feedstocks are produced
In 2007 the Dutch Government announced
sustainability criteria and has proposed a system
to enable traceability of feedstocks by 2020
The UK Government has proposed that 80 of
biofuels meet sustainability standards including
CO2 reduction requirements by 2010ndash11 The
EU is developing sustainability criteria
Business is also developing sustainability
standards through initiatives such as the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (chaired by
Unilever) and the Roundtable on Sustainable
Biofuels The latter aims to launch draft
sustainability standards in early 2008
90
2015
2015
[9] PRoPoRTioN of cRoP uSeD foR biofuelS ()
Source The German Marshall Fund of the USA
Brazil sugarcane USA corn
EU rapeseedEU cereals
1995 1995
19951995
2005 2005
20052005
2015
2015
39
45
lt15
20
60
43
16
70
20
0
50USATARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2030 30 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
11800000 tonnes
USA accounts for 15 of global biodiesel production
ChinaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 15 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
800000 tonnes
China has imposed a moratorium on projects making bioethanol fuel from corn and other basic food crops
BrazilTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2010 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
12900000 tonnes
IndiaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 20 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
240000 tonnes
EUTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
730000 tonnes
Europe accounts for 85 of global biodiesel production
Reduction in US land used for food crops pushes production elsewhere potentially causing deforestation
Brazil sugarcane and soybean
European demand for biodiesel feedstock raises palm oil price causing deforestation
Europe doesnrsquot have enough land to meet its biofuels targets and will be dependent on imports
USA corn wheat and soybean
Bioethanol production has pushed up corn prices sparking protests in Mexico
The worldrsquos poorest are already being affected by higher food prices
98 of Indonesiarsquos natural rainforest will be degraded or gone by 2022
KEY
Issues with food security
Issues with GHGs
Issues with sustainability
Issues with trade
Areas of tropical rainforest
Trade
Unintended consequences
Feedstocks
Europe rapeseed oil and wheat
unintended consequencesBiofuels could help boost rural development while reducing CO2 emissions and reliance on crude oil But if biofuel strategies are not fully evaluated they could do more harm than good stimulating poor performing biofuels and stifing innovation
CO2 performance
Biofuels can help fght climate change
but CO2 savings vary signifcantly
between fuels (see graphic 5)
This is because the amount of energy needed
to produce different feedstocks (type of
crop and where it is grown) and to process
them into fuels varies considerably For
example using US corn it takes 06ndash08
litres of fossil fuels to produce an amount of
bioethanol equivalent to 1 litre of mineral
oil whereas it takes less than 01 litres of
fossil fuels to produce the same amount of
bioethanol using Brazilian sugarcane15
1500 and 4600 litres of water18 to produce
just one litre of bioethanol There are already
water shortages in many regions and population
growth and climate change will further increase
competition for clean water and increase its cost
Land-use and food availability
The worldrsquos population is rapidly
increasing and is expected to exceed
9 billion19 by 2050 To feed this
growing population will require 50 more food
in the next 20 years
While higher food prices will beneft some
producers they negatively impact the economies
of food-importing countries Poor people who
spend a large proportion of their income on
food will suffer disproportionately compared
with the wealthy Mexico has already experienced
some of the negative consequences of the
growing US bioethanol industry In 2006
Mexicans took to the streets to protest at the
high price of tortillas (a corn bread staple) made
more expensive by demand for maize from USA
bioethanol producers
In 2007 the UN World Food Programme which
fghts famine in Africa announced that it could
no longer afford to maintain its current level of
support due to high commodity prices Its food
purchasing costs rose by almost 50 between
2002 and 2007 854 million23 people suffer from
hunger and this is increasing by an average of
4 million a year at current trends Increasing
food prices will mean that even more people will
depend on food aid
Land is a fnite resource
Some biofuels are much more land
effcient than others because of
higher feedstock yields per hectare and
more effcient production processes (see graphic
10) If we are to feed a growing population using
the fnite amount of agricultural land available
it is vital that governments choose to promote
biofuels that deliver the maximum possible
energy per hectare
First-generation biofuels
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from non-tropical
feedstocks (rape wheat and corn) are not land
effcient It would require a minimum of 26 of
the worldrsquos arable land to run just 20 of its cars
on these fuels
[11] GlobAl iMPAcTS AND uNiNTeNDeD coNSeQueNceS
Second-generation biofuels produce even
less CO2 as their feedstocks require fewer
agricultural inputs and production processes
are much more effcient
Biofuels cost more than petrol or diesel per
unit of energy because of the high cost of
feedstocks and production Using biodiesel
and bioethanol from crops grown in Europe
and the USA as a carbon reduction strategy
will cost around $200-$250 per tonne of
CO2 avoided at 2004 prices The cost of
bioethanol from sugarcane as in Brazil
can be comparable to that of fossil fuels
(see graphic 6) Bioethanol from cellulose
(a second-generation biofuel) could already
provide CO2 reductions at less than $200 a
tonne It is likely to remain expensive to
reduce CO2 using biodiesel and bioethanol
from US and European crops even after
2010 The cost of using second-generation
biofuels could come down to under $100 a
tonne with large-scale production
As more governments encourage the use of
biofuels and set mandatory targets demand
will outstrip supply leading to higher prices
for frst- and second-generation biofuels
Deforestation and land-use change
The demand for soya and palm oil
threatens rainforests in Brazil
Indonesia and Malaysia which
are being cleared for plantations These oils
are used by a number of industries but the
growth in biodiesel production is increasing
demand signifcantly
Rainforests store large amounts of carbon
above ground and in the soil which is
released when they are cleared (see
graphic 7) A much smaller amount of carbon
is absorbed by the plantations which replace
the forests This means biofuels grown in
tropical countries can contribute more to
climate change than fossil fuels when their
land-use impact is taken into account
Studies have shown that biodiesel made from
palm oil produces three16 to ten17 times more
CO2 than an equivalent amount of fossil
fuel The situation is even worse for biodiesel
made from soya as the crop yields less oil
and stores less carbon than palm plantations
Peat lands wetlands and grasslands also
release large amounts of carbon if converted
to agricultural use Most biodiesel is made
from rapeseed oil rather than palm oil and
soya bean oil But as an increasing share of
rapeseed oil is used for fuels rather than for
food more soya and palm is being planted
to compensate
Deforestation and land-use change means
that while biofuels can appear to help
governments meet their national greenhouse
gas emissions reduction targets they could in
reality be more damaging to climate change
globally when land-use impact is considered
This means that it is vital for national policies
to take into account the full life-cycle climate
impact of different biofuels
Biodiversity loss
The destruction of tropical forests
and grasslands to make way for
soya and palm plantations causes
signifcant destruction of plant and animal
species including endangered species such
as the orang-utan
Biofuel feedstocks are often grown as a
single crop over a wide area Known as
monoculture this brings high yields but
harms biodiversity These impacts can be
reduced to an extent through mixed planting
and leaving wild areas
Water scarcity
Both frst and second-generation
biofuels require large amounts of
water to grow and process the
feedstocks For example it takes between
In the past farmers have increased production
to meet growing demands But they are now
fnding it hard to keep up ndash in three of the four
years20 between 2003 and 2007 demand for
grains to feed people and livestock outstripped
supply As countries such as China and India
develop more people can afford meat and dairy
products This is driving up demand for agricultural
commodities The booming biofuels industry is
contributing further to this escalation in demand
First-generation biofuels compete with food
crops leading to rising food prices In future this
could jeopardise the worldrsquos ability to feed its
growing population Many other industries also
rely on raw materials like palm oil which are
being diverted to biofuel production
Increased demand higher prices
The biofuels industry is using an
increasing share of the worldrsquos food
crops (see graphic 9) which is driving
up prices Global food prices rose by 1021 in
2006 due to an increase in corn wheat and soya
bean oil prices Prices are predicted to rise by
20ndash5022 over the next decade (compared with
average levels over the last ten years)
Demand for biofuel feedstock increases prices
of other crops For example high demand for
corn to make bioethanol means US farmers are
producing less soya and wheat which is boosting
prices for those crops Biofuels are also raising
meat and dairy prices by pushing up the price of
animal feed
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from palm oil
and sugarcane are more land effcient but
there is limited potential to expand production
of the feedstocks without causing signifcant
environmental damage through loss of natural
forests and grasslands
Second-generation biofuels
To run 20 of the worldrsquos vehicles on second-
generation biofuels would require 7 of its
arable land The feedstocks for these fuels can
also be grown on other types of land such as
pastures and forests
Trade
Even at todayrsquos high oil prices most
biofuels cannot compete on cost with
petrol and diesel Biofuel producers
rely on government subsidies for their profts
Governments are beginning to set mandatory
targets to stimulate investment and demand
for biofuels This is further boosting the price
of agricultural commodities and contributing to
trade distortions
In Brazil a well-established biofuel industry and
low production costs means Brazilian bioethanol
is cost competitive with petrol and diesel The
EU and the USA have set trade barriers to
protect domestic biofuel industries from cheap
Brazilian bioethanol imports This is encouraging
the development of less cost-effective and less
sustainable biofuels This makes it more diffcult
for those developing countries that are better
suited to biofuels production to compete on
world markets
Many governments have proposed mandatory
biofuel targets that exceed their countryrsquos
production and land capacity In future this
could make these countries dependent on
foreign imports which will undermine their
energy security Commodity prices will continue
to rise as competition increases for limited
global supplies
The unilever position Unilever supports sustainable biofuels that deliver social and environmental benefts across their entire lifecycle
Unilever supports renewable energy
initiatives that deliver benefts on a lifecycle
basis helping to combat climate change and
reduce dependency on fossil fuels Around
17 of the energy we use for our operations
comes from renewable sources
Why the issue matters to Unilever
Two-thirds of the raw materials we use
come from agriculture These materials are
essential to our business and Unilever has
a clear interest in how they are grown and
in securing future supplies That is why
we have worked to improve the social and
environmental standards of agriculture
for more than a decade Our sustainable
agriculture programmes include palm oil
oilseed rape sunfowers spinach tomatoes
and tea We are also a member of several
sustainability initiatives including the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil
Demand for biofuels feedstock has already
reduced the availability of raw materials and
driven up prices We are concerned that
increased demand will destabilise world
food supply and undermine sustainable
agriculture Use of vegetable oils such as
rapeseed oil for biofuels could also create
shortages driving consumers to less healthy
animal fats
Lifecycle analysis
Unilever believes that individual biofuels
should be examined carefully to ensure
that the unintended environmental
(deforestation and biodiversity loss) and
socio-economic (food security) consequences
do not undermine the positive impacts
Biofuels must also be evaluated across their
lifecycle to achieve genuine greenhouse gas
(GHG) reductions
Biomass is a valuable resource Using it
to generate heat and electricity is a more
effcient and cost-effective way of reducing
CO2 emissions than using it to make
transport fuels24 New vehicle technologies
such as electric and hybrid and more
effcient engines offer signifcant scope
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
from transport
First-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that some frst-generation
biofuels are neither environmentally effcient
nor cost-effective ways to reduce emissions
Many studies have shown that several frst-
generation biofuels have poor performance
with regard to reducing GHG emissions and
dependency on fossil fuels Some even cause
more GHG emissions than the fossil fuels
they replace25
We are concerned that the use of valuable
food crops for energy purposes will increase
pressure on ecosystems and biodiversity
Deforestation particularly to make way for
palm oil and soya beans could lead to the
devastation of the last remaining rainforests
in Borneo and the Amazon region
Second-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that the development
of second-generation biofuels that donrsquot
compete with food crops and have low
carbon emissions is essential The mainstream
market introduction of second-generation
biofuels would provide a strong incentive
for the application of renewable energy
technologies while minimising the negative
repercussions on food markets and food
security Unilever believes there is a strong
case for government and business investment
in new technologies and further research on
the sustainable use of biomass Support for
second-generation biofuels could be
accelerated through
n RampD facilitation and technology transfer
n Tax exemption andor subsidies
n Phasing out support for poor performing
frst-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels should be
required to achieve at least 50 GHG
savings compared to fossil fuels
Assessing sustainability
We believe governments worldwide have
the responsibility to subject their biofuel
policies to a full impact assessment These
assessments should cover environmental
social and economic impacts from the
regions of production to the end use
Policies which aim to reduce GHG emissions
should contain full lifecycle assessments for
individual biofuels This should ensure that
change in land use is included in the carbon
balance We propose that government
targets should be based on CO2 reductions
rather than volume as well as on availability
of feedstocks
Sustainability standards
Unilever believes sustainability criteria should
be introduced for the use of biomass within
energy programmes These should include
criteria at the production level as well as
criteria at a macro-level such as overall GHG
balance and energy effciency food security
and the protection of biodiversity and
ecosystems The use of biomass for energy
should not be stimulated by government
programmes without the application of
transparent sustainability criteria Proceeding
without these safeguards will risk unintended
consequences that could result in worse
climate change impacts natural habitat loss
and disruption of staple food supplies
Whatrsquos driving biofuels growthBiofuels have existed for over a hundred years ndash Henry Ford designed his Model T to run on bioethanol ndash but they have mostly been unable to compete with fuels derived from crude oil New government energy policies subsidies and tax exemptions are now stimulating biofuels production which has doubled since 1998 and is predicted to double again by 20115 There are a number of reasons why governments favour biofuels
Combating climate change
Transport is a signifcant contributor to
climate change accounting for around
25 of man-made greenhouse gas
emissions globally
In principle the use of biofuels can help
reduce transportrsquos impact on climate
change This is because the plants used
to make the fuels absorb carbon dioxide
(CO2) ndash the most important greenhouse
gas ndash as they grow The gas is later
released when the biofuels are used
However biofuels are not carbon neutral
It takes energy to grow and harvest the
plants and to process and distribute
biofuels The entire process emits CO2
and fertilisers emit nitrous oxide (N2O) a
powerful greenhouse gas (see graphic 4)
The amount of energy needed to make
different biofuels varies considerably This
makes it vital to take the entire production
process into account when assessing
the potential of biofuels to help reduce
transport CO2 emissions Read more about
CO2 performance overleaf
Technology and innovation
Unlike other renewable fuels such
as hydrogen the infrastructure to
manufacture and distribute biofuels is in
place today Biofuels are also compatible
with todayrsquos vehicles and power
generation technology
In 2006 $26 billion6 was invested in
biofuels The International Energy Agency
(IEA)7 estimates that between 2005 and
2030 it will cost $160 billion to expand
biofuel production to fuel 4 of global
road transport and $225 billion to fuel 7
Energy security
Global energy demands are increasing
rapidly The worldrsquos population has
doubled in the last four decades ndash to
around 66 billion in 2004 ndash and is
expected to exceed 9 billion8 by 2050
Rapid development particularly in China
and India is increasing wealth and this is
boosting demands for energy and transport
There were around 900 million vehicles
on the road in 2000 but this is forecast to
increase to over 2 billion by 20509
Fossil fuels (oil coal and gas) are
expected to be the dominant source of
energy for the foreseeable future But
production has already peaked in many
major oil-producing countries and new
developments are increasingly located in
environmentally challenging and politically
unstable parts of the world This has
resulted in high oil prices which the IEA
predicts will remain between $48ndash$62
until 203010 Some analysts predict 2030
prices could be as high as $10011 High oil
prices hit developing countries the hardest
ndash some spend six times as much on fuel as
on health12
Biofuels are seen by governments as a
secure source of energy and a way to
reduce reliance on imported fossil fuels
Brazil has replaced around 1513 of its
petrol consumption with bioethanol
according to the IEA The Washington Post puts this fgure at 4014
Rural development
Biofuels can help boost farm incomes
Globalisation and the industrialisation of
farming have reduced the price farmers
get for their produce Demand for the
agricultural commodities used to make
biofuels is reversing this trend In the
developed world this is creating jobs
and reducing the need for subsidies
for farmers
[4] biofuel co2 lifecYcle iMPAcTS
CO2
Fertilising
Harvesting Transporting
Processing
Transporting
Use
Growing
CO2
CO2 CO2
CO2
CO2
CO2
Energy
EnergyEnergy
EnergyEnergy
Energy
N2O
[2] fiRST-GeNeRATioN biofuelS bioDieSel Production process
Soybean oil
Diesel mix
Palm oil Rapeseed oil
Methyl esters
Transesterifcation
[1] fiRST-GeNeRATioN biofuelS bioeThANol Production process
Sugarcane
Sugar
Petrol mix
Corn
Starch
bioethanol
fermentation
biomass to liquid production process
Petrol mixDiesel mix
celluose ethanol production process
[3] SecoND-GeNeRATioN biofuelS
biochemical treatment
enzymatic hydrolysis
Sugar
fermentation
cellulose ethanol
Thermochemical treatmentgasifcation
Synthesis gas
Synthesis
hydrocarbons
Biomass including agricultural
residues
Special crops such as fast growing woody plants
Changes in government energy policies
are accelerating demand for liquid or
gaseous biofuels used in transport (see
facing page)
Transport biofuels can be distributed using
existing technology and used in todayrsquos
vehicles without modifcation when mixed
with petrol or diesel or in adapted vehicles
if used neat or in high concentrations
There are many different biofuels made
using a variety of production processes
and feedstocks There are two categories
First-generation biofuels made from
food crops These are widely used today
Second-generation biofuels made from
non-food crops These are in development
and will not be widely commercially
available for at least fve to ten years
First-generation biofuels
First-generation biofuels are made from
food crops including wheat rapeseed
corn soya and sugarcane
There are two main types of frst-generation
biofuels now in commercial use
Bioethanol Bioethanol is made by fermenting sugars
produced by plants (similar to beer and
wine production) Bioethanol accounts for
around 851 of global biofuel production
and is mainly produced from corn and
sugarcane
Bioethanol is usually blended with petrol ndash
todayrsquos fuel standards allow bioethanol to
be mixed with petrol in volumes up to 5
in Europe and 10 in the USA Bioethanol
can be used at higher concentrations
or neat For example in Brazil all petrol
contains at least 20ndash25 bioethanol and
many vehicles have been adapted to run
on 100 bioethanol
Bioethanol has a lower energy density
than petrol This makes it about 402 less
fuel effcient
defo
rest
atio
n la
nd-u
se ch
ange
hig
h fo
od p
rices
land
-use
cha
e h
igh
food
pric
es f
ood
shor
tage
s la
nd a
vaila
bilit
y
food
shortag
es land ava
ilability
trad
e dist
or
tions
rura
l dev
elop
men
t en
ergy
secu
rity
CO2 savi
ngs sust
ainab
ilit
y sta
ndar
ds
trad
e di
stor
tions
wat
er sh
orta
ges
biodi
versi
ty lo
ss
ener
gy s
ecur
ity C
O2
sav
ngs
sus
tain
abilit
y st
anda
rds
inno
vatio
ns
What are biofuelsBiofuels are made by processing food crops and other plants animal products or wastes (collectively known as biomass) These can be burnt to generate electricity or heat and are increasingly being used as transport fuels
PRoMoTiNG SuSTAiNAble biofuelS
Biodiesel Biodiesel is a blend of methyl esters (a type
of biofuel) and diesel Methyl esters are
produced by a chemical reaction between a
vegetable oil and an alcohol They are made
from rapeseed (primarily) palm oil and
soybean oil and account for around 153
of global biofuel production
Biodiesel is the most commonly used
biofuel in Europe where fuel standards
allow 5 blends USA fuel standards allow
blends of up to 204 Specially designed
vehicles can run on 100 biodiesel
Second-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels are made from
non-food feedstocks such as wood and
straw The production process uses the
whole plant rather than just the plant
starches or sugars that are used to make
frst-generation biofuels This means waste
materials from agricultural and forestry can
be used as feedstocks
There are a number of second-generation
biofuels under development These include
cellulose ethanol which is produced from
straw using enzymes and can be mixed
with petrol biomass-to-liquid fuel which
is made from wood feedstocks and can be
blended with diesel and biomethane a
gas made from organic material (such as
manure and straw) which can be used in
modifed petrol and diesel engines
Sources of information 1 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
2 International Energy Agency httpieaorgtextbasework2004 eswg21_NCVpdf
3 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
4 httpwwwbiodieselorgresourcesfuelfactsheetsstandards_ and_warrantiesshtm
5 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
6 United Nations Environment Programme Global Trends in Sustainable Energy Investment 2007
7 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
8 United Nations World Population to 2300 2004
9 World Business Council for Sustainable Development Energy amp Climate Change Facts and Trends to 2050 2004
10 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
11 Energy Information Administration Annual Energy Outlook 2007
12 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
13 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
14 Washington Post 200807
15 International Energy Agency Biofuels for Transport ndash An International Perspective 2004
16 Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ 2006
17 Delft Hydraulics
18 Based on Food and Agriculture Organization data available at wwwwaterfootprintorg
19 United Nations World Population to 2300 2004
20 Economist 23607
21 International Monetary Fund World Economic Report April 2007
22 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Food and Agriculture Organization Agricultural Outlook 2007-2016
23 Food and Agriculture Organization State of Food Insecurity in the World 2006
24 International Energy Agency Biofuels For Transport An International Perspective 2004
25 Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ (2006) and Delft Hydraulics
Rainforest Deforestation Impacts [7] graphic
Journal of Cleaner Production 2006 Palm Oil and the Emission of Carbon-Based Greenhouse Gases Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ
Journal of Tropical Forest Science 2005 An Assessment of Changes in Biomass Carbon Stocks in Tree Crops and Forests in Malaysia Henson IE
Oil World Annual 2007 ISTA Mielke GmbH
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Volume 2 Energy 2006
Writing and consultancy Context
Design and production Red Letter Design
Illustrations (Graphics 4 and 7) KJA-artistscom
Printing Scanplus (on paper made from responsibly managed forests)
Unilever NV Weena 455 PO Box 760 3000 DK Rotterdam The Netherlands T +31 (0)10 217 4000 F +31 (0)10 217 4798
Commercial Register Rotterdam Number 24051830
Unilever PLC PO Box 68 100 Victoria Embankment London EC4P 4BQ United Kingdom T +44 (0)20 7822 5252 F +44 (0)20 7822 5951
Unilever PLC registered offce Unilever PLC Port Sunlight Wirral Merseyside CH62 4ZD United Kingdom
Registered in England and Wales Company Number 41424
wwwunilevercom
Sources FOLicht UN
[10] biofuelS eNeRGY DeliveRY(x 1000 litres of diesel equivalent per hectare)
Source FNR
1013 25
4054
Biomethane(energy crops)
Biomass- to-liquid
Bioethanol(wheat)
Biodiesel(rapeseed oil)
Bioethanol(sugar cane)
Sustainability criteria
The social and environmental impacts
of biofuels vary considerably
depending on the type of feedstock
used where it is grown and the processes
needed to turn it into biofuels
Sustainability criteria are required to provide
confdence in the labelling and identifcation
of specifc types of biofuel The criteria should
[8] PRoJecTeD GRoWTh iN fooD coNSuMPTioN
Source OECD-FAO 2006
-
-
-
-
-
-
2004 2009 2014 2019
100
110
120
130
140
150 Oil and oilseed meals
SugarMeat
CerealsDairy
1st generation biofuel 2nd generation biofuel
cover the lifecycle CO2 emissions and impacts
on natural habitats as well as socio-economic
factors such as the availability of food for the
local population where feedstocks are produced
In 2007 the Dutch Government announced
sustainability criteria and has proposed a system
to enable traceability of feedstocks by 2020
The UK Government has proposed that 80 of
biofuels meet sustainability standards including
CO2 reduction requirements by 2010ndash11 The
EU is developing sustainability criteria
Business is also developing sustainability
standards through initiatives such as the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (chaired by
Unilever) and the Roundtable on Sustainable
Biofuels The latter aims to launch draft
sustainability standards in early 2008
90
2015
2015
[9] PRoPoRTioN of cRoP uSeD foR biofuelS ()
Source The German Marshall Fund of the USA
Brazil sugarcane USA corn
EU rapeseedEU cereals
1995 1995
19951995
2005 2005
20052005
2015
2015
39
45
lt15
20
60
43
16
70
20
0
50USATARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2030 30 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
11800000 tonnes
USA accounts for 15 of global biodiesel production
ChinaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 15 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
800000 tonnes
China has imposed a moratorium on projects making bioethanol fuel from corn and other basic food crops
BrazilTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2010 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
12900000 tonnes
IndiaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 20 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
240000 tonnes
EUTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
730000 tonnes
Europe accounts for 85 of global biodiesel production
Reduction in US land used for food crops pushes production elsewhere potentially causing deforestation
Brazil sugarcane and soybean
European demand for biodiesel feedstock raises palm oil price causing deforestation
Europe doesnrsquot have enough land to meet its biofuels targets and will be dependent on imports
USA corn wheat and soybean
Bioethanol production has pushed up corn prices sparking protests in Mexico
The worldrsquos poorest are already being affected by higher food prices
98 of Indonesiarsquos natural rainforest will be degraded or gone by 2022
KEY
Issues with food security
Issues with GHGs
Issues with sustainability
Issues with trade
Areas of tropical rainforest
Trade
Unintended consequences
Feedstocks
Europe rapeseed oil and wheat
The unilever positionUnilever supports sustainable biofuels that deliver social and environmental benefts across their entire lifecycle
Unilever supports renewable energy
initiatives that deliver benefts on a lifecycle
basis helping to combat climate change and
reduce dependency on fossil fuels Around
17 of the energy we use for our operations
comes from renewable sources
Why the issue matters to Unilever
Two-thirds of the raw materials we use
come from agriculture These materials are
essential to our business and Unilever has
a clear interest in how they are grown and
in securing future supplies That is why
we have worked to improve the social and
environmental standards of agriculture
for more than a decade Our sustainable
agriculture programmes include palm oil
oilseed rape sunfowers spinach tomatoes
and tea We are also a member of several
sustainability initiatives including the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil
Demand for biofuels feedstock has already
reduced the availability of raw materials and
driven up prices We are concerned that
increased demand will destabilise world
food supply and undermine sustainable
agriculture Use of vegetable oils such as
rapeseed oil for biofuels could also create
shortages driving consumers to less healthy
animal fats
Lifecycle analysis
Unilever believes that individual biofuels
should be examined carefully to ensure
that the unintended environmental
(deforestation and biodiversity loss) and
socio-economic (food security) consequences
do not undermine the positive impacts
Biofuels must also be evaluated across their
lifecycle to achieve genuine greenhouse gas
(GHG) reductions
Biomass is a valuable resource Using it
to generate heat and electricity is a more
effcient and cost-effective way of reducing
CO2 emissions than using it to make
transport fuels24 New vehicle technologies
such as electric and hybrid and more
effcient engines offer signifcant scope
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
from transport
First-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that some frst-generation
biofuels are neither environmentally effcient
nor cost-effective ways to reduce emissions
Many studies have shown that several frst-
generation biofuels have poor performance
with regard to reducing GHG emissions and
dependency on fossil fuels Some even cause
more GHG emissions than the fossil fuels
they replace25
We are concerned that the use of valuable
food crops for energy purposes will increase
pressure on ecosystems and biodiversity
Deforestation particularly to make way for
palm oil and soya beans could lead to the
devastation of the last remaining rainforests
in Borneo and the Amazon region
Second-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that the development
of second-generation biofuels that donrsquot
compete with food crops and have low
carbon emissions is essential The mainstream
market introduction of second-generation
biofuels would provide a strong incentive
for the application of renewable energy
technologies while minimising the negative
repercussions on food markets and food
security Unilever believes there is a strong
case for government and business investment
in new technologies and further research on
the sustainable use of biomass Support for
second-generation biofuels could be
accelerated through
n RampD facilitation and technology transfer
n Tax exemption andor subsidies
n Phasing out support for poor performing
frst-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels should be
required to achieve at least 50 GHG
savings compared to fossil fuels
Assessing sustainability
We believe governments worldwide have
the responsibility to subject their biofuel
policies to a full impact assessment These
assessments should cover environmental
social and economic impacts from the
regions of production to the end use
Policies which aim to reduce GHG emissions
should contain full lifecycle assessments for
individual biofuels This should ensure that
change in land use is included in the carbon
balance We propose that government
targets should be based on CO2 reductions
rather than volume as well as on availability
of feedstocks
Sustainability standards
Unilever believes sustainability criteria should
be introduced for the use of biomass within
energy programmes These should include
criteria at the production level as well as
criteria at a macro-level such as overall GHG
balance and energy effciency food security
and the protection of biodiversity and
ecosystems The use of biomass for energy
should not be stimulated by government
programmes without the application of
transparent sustainability criteria Proceeding
without these safeguards will risk unintended
consequences that could result in worse
climate change impacts natural habitat loss
and disruption of staple food supplies
1500 and 4600 litres of water18 to produce
just one litre of bioethanol There are already
water shortages in many regions and population
growth and climate change will further increase
competition for clean water and increase its cost
Land-use and food availability
The worldrsquos population is rapidly
increasing and is expected to exceed
9 billion19 by 2050 To feed this
growing population will require 50 more food
in the next 20 years
While higher food prices will beneft some
producers they negatively impact the economies
of food-importing countries Poor people who
spend a large proportion of their income on
food will suffer disproportionately compared
with the wealthy Mexico has already experienced
some of the negative consequences of the
growing US bioethanol industry In 2006
Mexicans took to the streets to protest at the
high price of tortillas (a corn bread staple) made
more expensive by demand for maize from USA
bioethanol producers
In 2007 the UN World Food Programme which
fghts famine in Africa announced that it could
no longer afford to maintain its current level of
support due to high commodity prices Its food
purchasing costs rose by almost 50 between
2002 and 2007 854 million23 people suffer from
hunger and this is increasing by an average of
4 million a year at current trends Increasing
food prices will mean that even more people will
depend on food aid
Land is a fnite resource
Some biofuels are much more land
effcient than others because of
higher feedstock yields per hectare and
more effcient production processes (see graphic
10) If we are to feed a growing population using
the fnite amount of agricultural land available
it is vital that governments choose to promote
biofuels that deliver the maximum possible
energy per hectare
First-generation biofuels
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from non-tropical
feedstocks (rape wheat and corn) are not land
effcient It would require a minimum of 26 of
the worldrsquos arable land to run just 20 of its cars
on these fuels
[11] GlobAl iMPAcTS AND uNiNTeNDeD coNSeQueNceS
In the past farmers have increased production
to meet growing demands But they are now
fnding it hard to keep up ndash in three of the four
years20 between 2003 and 2007 demand for
grains to feed people and livestock outstripped
supply As countries such as China and India
develop more people can afford meat and dairy
products This is driving up demand for agricultural
commodities The booming biofuels industry is
contributing further to this escalation in demand
First-generation biofuels compete with food
crops leading to rising food prices In future this
could jeopardise the worldrsquos ability to feed its
growing population Many other industries also
rely on raw materials like palm oil which are
being diverted to biofuel production
Increased demand higher prices
The biofuels industry is using an
increasing share of the worldrsquos food
crops (see graphic 9) which is driving
up prices Global food prices rose by 1021 in
2006 due to an increase in corn wheat and soya
bean oil prices Prices are predicted to rise by
20ndash5022 over the next decade (compared with
average levels over the last ten years)
Demand for biofuel feedstock increases prices
of other crops For example high demand for
corn to make bioethanol means US farmers are
producing less soya and wheat which is boosting
prices for those crops Biofuels are also raising
meat and dairy prices by pushing up the price of
animal feed
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from palm oil
and sugarcane are more land effcient but
there is limited potential to expand production
of the feedstocks without causing signifcant
environmental damage through loss of natural
forests and grasslands
Second-generation biofuels
To run 20 of the worldrsquos vehicles on second-
generation biofuels would require 7 of its
arable land The feedstocks for these fuels can
also be grown on other types of land such as
pastures and forests
Trade
Even at todayrsquos high oil prices most
biofuels cannot compete on cost with
petrol and diesel Biofuel producers
rely on government subsidies for their profts
Governments are beginning to set mandatory
targets to stimulate investment and demand
for biofuels This is further boosting the price
of agricultural commodities and contributing to
trade distortions
In Brazil a well-established biofuel industry and
low production costs means Brazilian bioethanol
is cost competitive with petrol and diesel The
EU and the USA have set trade barriers to
protect domestic biofuel industries from cheap
Brazilian bioethanol imports This is encouraging
the development of less cost-effective and less
sustainable biofuels This makes it more diffcult
for those developing countries that are better
suited to biofuels production to compete on
world markets
Many governments have proposed mandatory
biofuel targets that exceed their countryrsquos
production and land capacity In future this
could make these countries dependent on
foreign imports which will undermine their
energy security Commodity prices will continue
to rise as competition increases for limited
global supplies
unintended consequences Biofuels could help boost rural development while reducing CO2 emissions and reliance on crude oil But if biofuel strategies are not fully evaluated they could do more harm than good stimulating poor performing biofuels and stifing innovation
CO2 performance
Biofuels can help fght climate change
but CO2 savings vary signifcantly
between fuels (see graphic 5)
This is because the amount of energy needed
to produce different feedstocks (type of
crop and where it is grown) and to process
them into fuels varies considerably For
example using US corn it takes 06ndash08
litres of fossil fuels to produce an amount of
bioethanol equivalent to 1 litre of mineral
oil whereas it takes less than 01 litres of
fossil fuels to produce the same amount of
bioethanol using Brazilian sugarcane15
[5] co2 ReDucTioN of biofuelS coMPAReD WiTh foSSil fuelS ()
Biomass to liquid Bioethanol Fossil (2nd generation) (corn) fuel
Bioethanol USA
(wheat) EU 100
87 100
lt10 30
40-60
10
Bioethanol Biodiesel (sugarcane) (rapeseed)
Brazil EU
Source IEA Energy Technology Perspective 2006
Second-generation biofuels produce even
less CO2 as their feedstocks require fewer
agricultural inputs and production processes
are much more effcient
Biofuels cost more than petrol or diesel per
unit of energy because of the high cost of
feedstocks and production Using biodiesel
and bioethanol from crops grown in Europe
[6] biofuelS SAviNGS biofuels cost per tonne GhG reduction ($ per tonne co2 equivalent)
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Bioethanol (corn)
Bioethanol (grain)
Bioethanol (cellulose) 2002
Biodiesel Post 2010 (rapeseed)
Biodiesel (biomass)
-50 0 200 400 600 800
Source IEA Biofuels for transportation An international perspective 2004
and the USA as a carbon reduction strategy
will cost around $200-$250 per tonne of
CO2 avoided at 2004 prices The cost of
bioethanol from sugarcane as in Brazil
can be comparable to that of fossil fuels
(see graphic 6) Bioethanol from cellulose
(a second-generation biofuel) could already
provide CO2 reductions at less than $200 a
tonne It is likely to remain expensive to
reduce CO2 using biodiesel and bioethanol
from US and European crops even after
2010 The cost of using second-generation
biofuels could come down to under $100 a
tonne with large-scale production
As more governments encourage the use of
biofuels and set mandatory targets demand
will outstrip supply leading to higher prices
for frst- and second-generation biofuels
Deforestation and land-use change
The demand for soya and palm oil
threatens rainforests in Brazil
Indonesia and Malaysia which
are being cleared for plantations These oils
are used by a number of industries but the
growth in biodiesel production is increasing
demand signifcantly
[7] RAiNfoReST DefoReSTATioN iMPAcTS carbon storage and co2 emissions per hectare in Se Asia
230 830 48 tonnes tonnes tonnes carbon CO2 carbon
Rainforest Deforestation Palm plantations Carbon stored Carbon released as Stores only 20 of above ground CO2 due to clearing carbon per hectare
and burning compared to rain-forest (equivalent to
165 tonnes CO2)
Sources see back page
Rainforests store large amounts of carbon
above ground and in the soil which is
released when they are cleared (see
graphic 7) A much smaller amount of carbon
is absorbed by the plantations which replace
the forests This means biofuels grown in
tropical countries can contribute more to
climate change than fossil fuels when their
land-use impact is taken into account
Studies have shown that biodiesel made from
palm oil produces three16 to ten17 times more
CO2 than an equivalent amount of fossil
fuel The situation is even worse for biodiesel
made from soya as the crop yields less oil
and stores less carbon than palm plantations
Peat lands wetlands and grasslands also
release large amounts of carbon if converted
to agricultural use Most biodiesel is made
from rapeseed oil rather than palm oil and
soya bean oil But as an increasing share of
rapeseed oil is used for fuels rather than for
food more soya and palm is being planted
to compensate
Deforestation and land-use change means
that while biofuels can appear to help
governments meet their national greenhouse
gas emissions reduction targets they could in
reality be more damaging to climate change
globally when land-use impact is considered
This means that it is vital for national policies
to take into account the full life-cycle climate
impact of different biofuels
Biodiversity loss
The destruction of tropical forests
and grasslands to make way for
soya and palm plantations causes
signifcant destruction of plant and animal
species including endangered species such
as the orang-utan
Biofuel feedstocks are often grown as a
single crop over a wide area Known as
monoculture this brings high yields but
harms biodiversity These impacts can be
reduced to an extent through mixed planting
and leaving wild areas
Water scarcity
Both frst and second-generation
biofuels require large amounts of
water to grow and process the
feedstocks For example it takes between
Sources FOLicht UN
Sustainability criteria
The social and environmental impacts
of biofuels vary considerably
depending on the type of feedstock
used where it is grown and the processes
needed to turn it into biofuels
Sustainability criteria are required to provide
confdence in the labelling and identifcation
of specifc types of biofuel The criteria should
100
[5] co2 ReDucTioN of biofuelS coMPAReD WiTh foSSil fuelS ()
Source IEA Energy Technology Perspective 2006
Bioethanol (corn) USA
Bioethanol (wheat)
EU
Biomass to liquid(2nd generation)
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Brazil
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
EU
Fossil fuel
lt10 40-6087
100
1030
[7] RAiNfoReST DefoReSTATioN iMPAcTScarbon storage and co2 emissions per hectare in Se Asia
Sources see back page
RainforestCarbon stored above ground
230tonnescarbon
DeforestationCarbon released as CO2 due to clearing
and burning
830tonnes
CO2
Palm plantationsStores only 20 of carbon per hectare compared to rain-
forest (equivalent to 165 tonnes CO2)
48tonnescarbon
[6] biofuelS SAviNGSbiofuels cost per tonne GhG reduction ($ per tonne co2 equivalent)
Source IEA Biofuels for transportation An international perspective 2004
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Bioethanol (corn)
Bioethanol (grain)
Bioethanol (cellulose)
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
Biodiesel (biomass)
0 200 400 600 800-50
2002Post 2010
cover the lifecycle CO2 emissions and impacts
on natural habitats as well as socio-economic
factors such as the availability of food for the
local population where feedstocks are produced
In 2007 the Dutch Government announced
sustainability criteria and has proposed a system
to enable traceability of feedstocks by 2020
The UK Government has proposed that 80 of
biofuels meet sustainability standards including
CO2 reduction requirements by 2010ndash11 The
EU is developing sustainability criteria
Business is also developing sustainability
standards through initiatives such as the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (chaired by
Unilever) and the Roundtable on Sustainable
Biofuels The latter aims to launch draft
sustainability standards in early 2008
USATARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2030 30 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
11800000 tonnes
USA accounts for 15 of global biodiesel production
ChinaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 15 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
800000 tonnes
China has imposed a moratorium on projects making bioethanol fuel from corn and other basic food crops
BrazilTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2010 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
12900000 tonnes
IndiaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 20 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
240000 tonnes
EUTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
730000 tonnes
Europe accounts for 85 of global biodiesel production
Reduction in US land used for food crops pushes production elsewhere potentially causing deforestation
Brazil sugarcane and soybean
European demand for biodiesel feedstock raises palm oil price causing deforestation
Europe doesnrsquot have enough land to meet its biofuels targets and will be dependent on imports
USA corn wheat and soybean
Bioethanol production has pushed up corn prices sparking protests in Mexico
The worldrsquos poorest are already being affected by higher food prices
98 of Indonesiarsquos natural rainforest will be degraded or gone by 2022
KEY
Issues with food security
Issues with GHGs
Issues with sustainability
Issues with trade
Areas of tropical rainforest
Trade
Unintended consequences
Feedstocks
Europe rapeseed oil and wheat
The unilever positionUnilever supports sustainable biofuels that deliver social and environmental benefts across their entire lifecycle
Unilever supports renewable energy
initiatives that deliver benefts on a lifecycle
basis helping to combat climate change and
reduce dependency on fossil fuels Around
17 of the energy we use for our operations
comes from renewable sources
Why the issue matters to Unilever
Two-thirds of the raw materials we use
come from agriculture These materials are
essential to our business and Unilever has
a clear interest in how they are grown and
in securing future supplies That is why
we have worked to improve the social and
environmental standards of agriculture
for more than a decade Our sustainable
agriculture programmes include palm oil
oilseed rape sunfowers spinach tomatoes
and tea We are also a member of several
sustainability initiatives including the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil
Demand for biofuels feedstock has already
reduced the availability of raw materials and
driven up prices We are concerned that
increased demand will destabilise world
food supply and undermine sustainable
agriculture Use of vegetable oils such as
rapeseed oil for biofuels could also create
shortages driving consumers to less healthy
animal fats
Lifecycle analysis
Unilever believes that individual biofuels
should be examined carefully to ensure
that the unintended environmental
(deforestation and biodiversity loss) and
socio-economic (food security) consequences
do not undermine the positive impacts
Biofuels must also be evaluated across their
lifecycle to achieve genuine greenhouse gas
(GHG) reductions
Biomass is a valuable resource Using it
to generate heat and electricity is a more
effcient and cost-effective way of reducing
CO2 emissions than using it to make
transport fuels24 New vehicle technologies
such as electric and hybrid and more
effcient engines offer signifcant scope
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
from transport
First-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that some frst-generation
biofuels are neither environmentally effcient
nor cost-effective ways to reduce emissions
Many studies have shown that several frst-
generation biofuels have poor performance
with regard to reducing GHG emissions and
dependency on fossil fuels Some even cause
more GHG emissions than the fossil fuels
they replace25
We are concerned that the use of valuable
food crops for energy purposes will increase
pressure on ecosystems and biodiversity
Deforestation particularly to make way for
palm oil and soya beans could lead to the
devastation of the last remaining rainforests
in Borneo and the Amazon region
Second-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that the development
of second-generation biofuels that donrsquot
compete with food crops and have low
carbon emissions is essential The mainstream
market introduction of second-generation
biofuels would provide a strong incentive
for the application of renewable energy
technologies while minimising the negative
repercussions on food markets and food
security Unilever believes there is a strong
case for government and business investment
in new technologies and further research on
the sustainable use of biomass Support for
second-generation biofuels could be
accelerated through
n RampD facilitation and technology transfer
n Tax exemption andor subsidies
n Phasing out support for poor performing
frst-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels should be
required to achieve at least 50 GHG
savings compared to fossil fuels
Assessing sustainability
We believe governments worldwide have
the responsibility to subject their biofuel
policies to a full impact assessment These
assessments should cover environmental
social and economic impacts from the
regions of production to the end use
Policies which aim to reduce GHG emissions
should contain full lifecycle assessments for
individual biofuels This should ensure that
change in land use is included in the carbon
balance We propose that government
targets should be based on CO2 reductions
rather than volume as well as on availability
of feedstocks
Sustainability standards
Unilever believes sustainability criteria should
be introduced for the use of biomass within
energy programmes These should include
criteria at the production level as well as
criteria at a macro-level such as overall GHG
balance and energy effciency food security
and the protection of biodiversity and
ecosystems The use of biomass for energy
should not be stimulated by government
programmes without the application of
transparent sustainability criteria Proceeding
without these safeguards will risk unintended
consequences that could result in worse
climate change impacts natural habitat loss
and disruption of staple food supplies
unintended consequencesBiofuels could help boost rural development while reducing CO2 emissions and reliance on crude oil But if biofuel strategies are not fully evaluated they could do more harm than good stimulating poor performing biofuels and stifing innovation
CO2 performance
Biofuels can help fght climate change
but CO2 savings vary signifcantly
between fuels (see graphic 5)
This is because the amount of energy needed
to produce different feedstocks (type of
crop and where it is grown) and to process
them into fuels varies considerably For
example using US corn it takes 06ndash08
litres of fossil fuels to produce an amount of
bioethanol equivalent to 1 litre of mineral
oil whereas it takes less than 01 litres of
fossil fuels to produce the same amount of
bioethanol using Brazilian sugarcane15
[11] GlobAl iMPAcTS AND uNiNTeNDeD coNSeQueNceS
Second-generation biofuels produce even
less CO2 as their feedstocks require fewer
agricultural inputs and production processes
are much more effcient
Biofuels cost more than petrol or diesel per
unit of energy because of the high cost of
feedstocks and production Using biodiesel
and bioethanol from crops grown in Europe
and the USA as a carbon reduction strategy
will cost around $200-$250 per tonne of
CO2 avoided at 2004 prices The cost of
bioethanol from sugarcane as in Brazil
can be comparable to that of fossil fuels
(see graphic 6) Bioethanol from cellulose
(a second-generation biofuel) could already
provide CO2 reductions at less than $200 a
tonne It is likely to remain expensive to
reduce CO2 using biodiesel and bioethanol
from US and European crops even after
2010 The cost of using second-generation
biofuels could come down to under $100 a
tonne with large-scale production
As more governments encourage the use of
biofuels and set mandatory targets demand
will outstrip supply leading to higher prices
for frst- and second-generation biofuels
Deforestation and land-use change
The demand for soya and palm oil
threatens rainforests in Brazil
Indonesia and Malaysia which
are being cleared for plantations These oils
are used by a number of industries but the
growth in biodiesel production is increasing
demand signifcantly
Rainforests store large amounts of carbon
above ground and in the soil which is
released when they are cleared (see
graphic 7) A much smaller amount of carbon
is absorbed by the plantations which replace
the forests This means biofuels grown in
tropical countries can contribute more to
climate change than fossil fuels when their
land-use impact is taken into account
Studies have shown that biodiesel made from
palm oil produces three16 to ten17 times more
CO2 than an equivalent amount of fossil
fuel The situation is even worse for biodiesel
made from soya as the crop yields less oil
and stores less carbon than palm plantations
Peat lands wetlands and grasslands also
release large amounts of carbon if converted
to agricultural use Most biodiesel is made
from rapeseed oil rather than palm oil and
soya bean oil But as an increasing share of
rapeseed oil is used for fuels rather than for
food more soya and palm is being planted
to compensate
Deforestation and land-use change means
that while biofuels can appear to help
governments meet their national greenhouse
gas emissions reduction targets they could in
reality be more damaging to climate change
globally when land-use impact is considered
This means that it is vital for national policies
to take into account the full life-cycle climate
impact of different biofuels
Biodiversity loss
The destruction of tropical forests
and grasslands to make way for
soya and palm plantations causes
signifcant destruction of plant and animal
species including endangered species such
as the orang-utan
Biofuel feedstocks are often grown as a
single crop over a wide area Known as
monoculture this brings high yields but
harms biodiversity These impacts can be
reduced to an extent through mixed planting
and leaving wild areas
Water scarcity
Both frst and second-generation
biofuels require large amounts of
water to grow and process the
feedstocks For example it takes between
1500 and 4600 litres of water18 to produce [9] PRoPoRTioN of cRoP uSeD foR biofuelS () [10] biofuelS eNeRGY DeliveRY just one litre of bioethanol There are already
Brazil sugarcane USA corn (x 1000 litres of diesel equivalent per hectare)
water shortages in many regions and population Biodiesel Bioethanol
growth and climate change will further increase (rapeseed oil) (sugar cane)
competition for clean water and increase its cost 70 50
Land-use and food availability
The worldrsquos population is rapidly
increasing and is expected to exceed
9 billion19 by 2050 To feed this
growing population will require 50 more food
in the next 20 years
[8] PRoJecTeD GRoWTh iN fooD coNSuMPTioN
Oil and oilseed meals
150 -
140 -Sugar Meat
130 -Cereals Dairy
120 -
110 -
100 -
2004 2009 2014 2019
Source OECD-FAO 2006
In the past farmers have increased production
to meet growing demands But they are now
fnding it hard to keep up ndash in three of the four
years20 between 2003 and 2007 demand for
grains to feed people and livestock outstripped
supply As countries such as China and India
develop more people can afford meat and dairy
products This is driving up demand for agricultural
commodities The booming biofuels industry is
contributing further to this escalation in demand
First-generation biofuels compete with food
crops leading to rising food prices In future this
could jeopardise the worldrsquos ability to feed its
growing population Many other industries also
rely on raw materials like palm oil which are
being diverted to biofuel production
Increased demand higher prices
The biofuels industry is using an
increasing share of the worldrsquos food
crops (see graphic 9) which is driving
up prices Global food prices rose by 1021 in
2006 due to an increase in corn wheat and soya
bean oil prices Prices are predicted to rise by
20ndash5022 over the next decade (compared with
average levels over the last ten years)
Demand for biofuel feedstock increases prices
of other crops For example high demand for
corn to make bioethanol means US farmers are
producing less soya and wheat which is boosting
prices for those crops Biofuels are also raising
meat and dairy prices by pushing up the price of
animal feed
39 43 20
45
1995 2005 2015 1995 2005 2015
EU cereals EU rapeseed
90
60
20
0 16 lt15 1995 2005 20151995 2005 2015
Source The German Marshall Fund of the USA
While higher food prices will beneft some
producers they negatively impact the economies
of food-importing countries Poor people who
spend a large proportion of their income on
food will suffer disproportionately compared
with the wealthy Mexico has already experienced
some of the negative consequences of the
growing US bioethanol industry In 2006
Mexicans took to the streets to protest at the
high price of tortillas (a corn bread staple) made
more expensive by demand for maize from USA
bioethanol producers
In 2007 the UN World Food Programme which
fghts famine in Africa announced that it could
no longer afford to maintain its current level of
support due to high commodity prices Its food
purchasing costs rose by almost 50 between
2002 and 2007 854 million23 people suffer from
hunger and this is increasing by an average of
4 million a year at current trends Increasing
food prices will mean that even more people will
depend on food aid
Land is a fnite resource
Some biofuels are much more land
effcient than others because of
higher feedstock yields per hectare and
more effcient production processes (see graphic
10) If we are to feed a growing population using
the fnite amount of agricultural land available
it is vital that governments choose to promote
biofuels that deliver the maximum possible
energy per hectare
First-generation biofuels
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from non-tropical
feedstocks (rape wheat and corn) are not land
effcient It would require a minimum of 26 of
the worldrsquos arable land to run just 20 of its cars
on these fuels
104 405 13 25
Bioethanol Biomass- Biomethane (wheat) to-liquid (energy crops)
1st generation biofuel 2nd generation biofuel
Source FNR
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from palm oil
and sugarcane are more land effcient but
there is limited potential to expand production
of the feedstocks without causing signifcant
environmental damage through loss of natural
forests and grasslands
Second-generation biofuels
To run 20 of the worldrsquos vehicles on second-
generation biofuels would require 7 of its
arable land The feedstocks for these fuels can
also be grown on other types of land such as
pastures and forests
Trade
Even at todayrsquos high oil prices most
biofuels cannot compete on cost with
petrol and diesel Biofuel producers
rely on government subsidies for their profts
Governments are beginning to set mandatory
targets to stimulate investment and demand
for biofuels This is further boosting the price
of agricultural commodities and contributing to
trade distortions
In Brazil a well-established biofuel industry and
low production costs means Brazilian bioethanol
is cost competitive with petrol and diesel The
EU and the USA have set trade barriers to
protect domestic biofuel industries from cheap
Brazilian bioethanol imports This is encouraging
the development of less cost-effective and less
sustainable biofuels This makes it more diffcult
for those developing countries that are better
suited to biofuels production to compete on
world markets
Many governments have proposed mandatory
biofuel targets that exceed their countryrsquos
production and land capacity In future this
could make these countries dependent on
foreign imports which will undermine their
energy security Commodity prices will continue
to rise as competition increases for limited
global supplies
[10] biofuelS eNeRGY DeliveRY(x 1000 litres of diesel equivalent per hectare)
Source FNR
1013 25
4054
Biomethane(energy crops)
Biomass- to-liquid
Bioethanol(wheat)
Biodiesel(rapeseed oil)
Bioethanol(sugar cane)
100
[5] co2 ReDucTioN of biofuelS coMPAReD WiTh foSSil fuelS ()
Source IEA Energy Technology Perspective 2006
Bioethanol (corn) USA
Bioethanol (wheat)
EU
Biomass to liquid(2nd generation)
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Brazil
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
EU
Fossil fuel
lt10 40-6087
100
1030
[7] RAiNfoReST DefoReSTATioN iMPAcTScarbon storage and co2 emissions per hectare in Se Asia
Sources see back page
RainforestCarbon stored above ground
230tonnescarbon
DeforestationCarbon released as CO2 due to clearing
and burning
830tonnes
CO2
Palm plantationsStores only 20 of carbon per hectare compared to rain-
forest (equivalent to 165 tonnes CO2)
48tonnescarbon
[6] biofuelS SAviNGSbiofuels cost per tonne GhG reduction ($ per tonne co2 equivalent)
Source IEA Biofuels for transportation An international perspective 2004
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Bioethanol (corn)
Bioethanol (grain)
Bioethanol (cellulose)
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
Biodiesel (biomass)
0 200 400 600 800-50
2002Post 2010
[8] PRoJecTeD GRoWTh iN fooD coNSuMPTioN
Source OECD-FAO 2006
-
-
-
-
-
-
2004 2009 2014 2019
100
110
120
130
140
150 Oil and oilseed meals
SugarMeat
CerealsDairy
1st generation biofuel 2nd generation biofuel
90
2015
2015
[9] PRoPoRTioN of cRoP uSeD foR biofuelS ()
Source The German Marshall Fund of the USA
Brazil sugarcane USA corn
EU rapeseedEU cereals
1995 1995
19951995
2005 2005
20052005
2015
2015
39
45
lt15
20
60
43
16
70
20
0
50
The unilever positionUnilever supports sustainable biofuels that deliver social and environmental benefts across their entire lifecycle
Unilever supports renewable energy
initiatives that deliver benefts on a lifecycle
basis helping to combat climate change and
reduce dependency on fossil fuels Around
17 of the energy we use for our operations
comes from renewable sources
Why the issue matters to Unilever
Two-thirds of the raw materials we use
come from agriculture These materials are
essential to our business and Unilever has
a clear interest in how they are grown and
in securing future supplies That is why
we have worked to improve the social and
environmental standards of agriculture
for more than a decade Our sustainable
agriculture programmes include palm oil
oilseed rape sunfowers spinach tomatoes
and tea We are also a member of several
sustainability initiatives including the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil
Demand for biofuels feedstock has already
reduced the availability of raw materials and
driven up prices We are concerned that
increased demand will destabilise world
food supply and undermine sustainable
agriculture Use of vegetable oils such as
rapeseed oil for biofuels could also create
shortages driving consumers to less healthy
animal fats
Lifecycle analysis
Unilever believes that individual biofuels
should be examined carefully to ensure
that the unintended environmental
(deforestation and biodiversity loss) and
socio-economic (food security) consequences
do not undermine the positive impacts
Biofuels must also be evaluated across their
lifecycle to achieve genuine greenhouse gas
(GHG) reductions
Biomass is a valuable resource Using it
to generate heat and electricity is a more
effcient and cost-effective way of reducing
CO2 emissions than using it to make
transport fuels24 New vehicle technologies
such as electric and hybrid and more
effcient engines offer signifcant scope
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
from transport
First-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that some frst-generation
biofuels are neither environmentally effcient
nor cost-effective ways to reduce emissions
Many studies have shown that several frst-
generation biofuels have poor performance
with regard to reducing GHG emissions and
dependency on fossil fuels Some even cause
more GHG emissions than the fossil fuels
they replace25
We are concerned that the use of valuable
food crops for energy purposes will increase
pressure on ecosystems and biodiversity
Deforestation particularly to make way for
palm oil and soya beans could lead to the
devastation of the last remaining rainforests
in Borneo and the Amazon region
Second-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that the development
of second-generation biofuels that donrsquot
compete with food crops and have low
carbon emissions is essential The mainstream
market introduction of second-generation
biofuels would provide a strong incentive
for the application of renewable energy
technologies while minimising the negative
repercussions on food markets and food
security Unilever believes there is a strong
case for government and business investment
in new technologies and further research on
the sustainable use of biomass Support for
second-generation biofuels could be
accelerated through
n RampD facilitation and technology transfer
n Tax exemption andor subsidies
n Phasing out support for poor performing
frst-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels should be
required to achieve at least 50 GHG
savings compared to fossil fuels
Assessing sustainability
We believe governments worldwide have
the responsibility to subject their biofuel
policies to a full impact assessment These
assessments should cover environmental
social and economic impacts from the
regions of production to the end use
Policies which aim to reduce GHG emissions
should contain full lifecycle assessments for
individual biofuels This should ensure that
change in land use is included in the carbon
balance We propose that government
targets should be based on CO2 reductions
rather than volume as well as on availability
of feedstocks
Sustainability standards
Unilever believes sustainability criteria should
be introduced for the use of biomass within
energy programmes These should include
criteria at the production level as well as
criteria at a macro-level such as overall GHG
balance and energy effciency food security
and the protection of biodiversity and
ecosystems The use of biomass for energy
should not be stimulated by government
programmes without the application of
transparent sustainability criteria Proceeding
without these safeguards will risk unintended
consequences that could result in worse
climate change impacts natural habitat loss
and disruption of staple food supplies
unintended consequencesBiofuels could help boost rural development while reducing CO2 emissions and reliance on crude oil But if biofuel strategies are not fully evaluated they could do more harm than good stimulating poor performing biofuels and stifing innovation
CO2 performance
Biofuels can help fght climate change
but CO2 savings vary signifcantly
between fuels (see graphic 5)
This is because the amount of energy needed
to produce different feedstocks (type of
crop and where it is grown) and to process
them into fuels varies considerably For
example using US corn it takes 06ndash08
litres of fossil fuels to produce an amount of
bioethanol equivalent to 1 litre of mineral
oil whereas it takes less than 01 litres of
fossil fuels to produce the same amount of
bioethanol using Brazilian sugarcane15
1500 and 4600 litres of water18 to produce
just one litre of bioethanol There are already
water shortages in many regions and population
growth and climate change will further increase
competition for clean water and increase its cost
Land-use and food availability
The worldrsquos population is rapidly
increasing and is expected to exceed
9 billion19 by 2050 To feed this
growing population will require 50 more food
in the next 20 years
While higher food prices will beneft some
producers they negatively impact the economies
of food-importing countries Poor people who
spend a large proportion of their income on
food will suffer disproportionately compared
with the wealthy Mexico has already experienced
some of the negative consequences of the
growing US bioethanol industry In 2006
Mexicans took to the streets to protest at the
high price of tortillas (a corn bread staple) made
more expensive by demand for maize from USA
bioethanol producers
In 2007 the UN World Food Programme which
fghts famine in Africa announced that it could
no longer afford to maintain its current level of
support due to high commodity prices Its food
purchasing costs rose by almost 50 between
2002 and 2007 854 million23 people suffer from
hunger and this is increasing by an average of
4 million a year at current trends Increasing
food prices will mean that even more people will
depend on food aid
Land is a fnite resource
Some biofuels are much more land
effcient than others because of
higher feedstock yields per hectare and
more effcient production processes (see graphic
10) If we are to feed a growing population using
the fnite amount of agricultural land available
it is vital that governments choose to promote
biofuels that deliver the maximum possible
energy per hectare
First-generation biofuels
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from non-tropical
feedstocks (rape wheat and corn) are not land
effcient It would require a minimum of 26 of
the worldrsquos arable land to run just 20 of its cars
on these fuels
Second-generation biofuels produce even
less CO2 as their feedstocks require fewer
agricultural inputs and production processes
are much more effcient
Biofuels cost more than petrol or diesel per
unit of energy because of the high cost of
feedstocks and production Using biodiesel
and bioethanol from crops grown in Europe
and the USA as a carbon reduction strategy
will cost around $200-$250 per tonne of
CO2 avoided at 2004 prices The cost of
bioethanol from sugarcane as in Brazil
can be comparable to that of fossil fuels
(see graphic 6) Bioethanol from cellulose
(a second-generation biofuel) could already
provide CO2 reductions at less than $200 a
tonne It is likely to remain expensive to
reduce CO2 using biodiesel and bioethanol
from US and European crops even after
2010 The cost of using second-generation
biofuels could come down to under $100 a
tonne with large-scale production
As more governments encourage the use of
biofuels and set mandatory targets demand
will outstrip supply leading to higher prices
for frst- and second-generation biofuels
Deforestation and land-use change
The demand for soya and palm oil
threatens rainforests in Brazil
Indonesia and Malaysia which
are being cleared for plantations These oils
are used by a number of industries but the
growth in biodiesel production is increasing
demand signifcantly
Rainforests store large amounts of carbon
above ground and in the soil which is
released when they are cleared (see
graphic 7) A much smaller amount of carbon
is absorbed by the plantations which replace
the forests This means biofuels grown in
tropical countries can contribute more to
climate change than fossil fuels when their
land-use impact is taken into account
Studies have shown that biodiesel made from
palm oil produces three16 to ten17 times more
CO2 than an equivalent amount of fossil
fuel The situation is even worse for biodiesel
made from soya as the crop yields less oil
and stores less carbon than palm plantations
Peat lands wetlands and grasslands also
release large amounts of carbon if converted
to agricultural use Most biodiesel is made
from rapeseed oil rather than palm oil and
soya bean oil But as an increasing share of
rapeseed oil is used for fuels rather than for
food more soya and palm is being planted
to compensate
Deforestation and land-use change means
that while biofuels can appear to help
governments meet their national greenhouse
gas emissions reduction targets they could in
reality be more damaging to climate change
globally when land-use impact is considered
This means that it is vital for national policies
to take into account the full life-cycle climate
impact of different biofuels
Biodiversity loss
The destruction of tropical forests
and grasslands to make way for
soya and palm plantations causes
signifcant destruction of plant and animal
species including endangered species such
as the orang-utan
Biofuel feedstocks are often grown as a
single crop over a wide area Known as
monoculture this brings high yields but
harms biodiversity These impacts can be
reduced to an extent through mixed planting
and leaving wild areas
Water scarcity
Both frst and second-generation
biofuels require large amounts of
water to grow and process the
feedstocks For example it takes between
In the past farmers have increased production
to meet growing demands But they are now
fnding it hard to keep up ndash in three of the four
years20 between 2003 and 2007 demand for
grains to feed people and livestock outstripped
supply As countries such as China and India
develop more people can afford meat and dairy
products This is driving up demand for agricultural
commodities The booming biofuels industry is
contributing further to this escalation in demand
First-generation biofuels compete with food
crops leading to rising food prices In future this
could jeopardise the worldrsquos ability to feed its
growing population Many other industries also
rely on raw materials like palm oil which are
being diverted to biofuel production
Increased demand higher prices
The biofuels industry is using an
increasing share of the worldrsquos food
crops (see graphic 9) which is driving
up prices Global food prices rose by 1021 in
2006 due to an increase in corn wheat and soya
bean oil prices Prices are predicted to rise by
20ndash5022 over the next decade (compared with
average levels over the last ten years)
Demand for biofuel feedstock increases prices
of other crops For example high demand for
corn to make bioethanol means US farmers are
producing less soya and wheat which is boosting
prices for those crops Biofuels are also raising
meat and dairy prices by pushing up the price of
animal feed
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from palm oil
and sugarcane are more land effcient but
there is limited potential to expand production
of the feedstocks without causing signifcant
environmental damage through loss of natural
forests and grasslands
Second-generation biofuels
To run 20 of the worldrsquos vehicles on second-
generation biofuels would require 7 of its
arable land The feedstocks for these fuels can
also be grown on other types of land such as
pastures and forests
Trade
Even at todayrsquos high oil prices most
biofuels cannot compete on cost with
petrol and diesel Biofuel producers
rely on government subsidies for their profts
Governments are beginning to set mandatory
targets to stimulate investment and demand
for biofuels This is further boosting the price
of agricultural commodities and contributing to
trade distortions
In Brazil a well-established biofuel industry and
low production costs means Brazilian bioethanol
is cost competitive with petrol and diesel The
EU and the USA have set trade barriers to
protect domestic biofuel industries from cheap
Brazilian bioethanol imports This is encouraging
the development of less cost-effective and less
sustainable biofuels This makes it more diffcult
for those developing countries that are better
suited to biofuels production to compete on
world markets
Many governments have proposed mandatory
biofuel targets that exceed their countryrsquos
production and land capacity In future this
could make these countries dependent on
foreign imports which will undermine their
energy security Commodity prices will continue
to rise as competition increases for limited
global supplies
[11] GlobAl iMPAcTS AND uNiNTeNDeD coNSeQueNceS
USA TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2030 30 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
11800000 tonnes
USA accounts for 15 of global biodiesel production
EU TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
730000 tonnes
Europe accounts for 85 of global biodiesel production
China TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 15 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
800000 tonnes
China has imposed a moratorium on projects making bioethanol fuel from corn and other basic food crops
USA corn wheat and soybean
Reduction in US land Bioethanol production used for food crops has pushed up corn pushes production prices sparking elsewhere potentially protests in Mexico causing deforestation
Europe doesnrsquot have enough land to meet its biofuels targets Europe rapeseed oil and wheatand will be dependent on imports
The worldrsquos poorest are already being affected by higher food prices
Brazil sugarcane and soybean
KEY
Issues with food security
Issues with GHGs
Issues with sustainability
Issues with trade
Feedstocks
Areas of tropical rainforest
Trade
Unintended consequences
Sustainability criteria
The social and environmental impacts
of biofuels vary considerably
depending on the type of feedstock
used where it is grown and the processes
needed to turn it into biofuels
Sustainability criteria are required to provide
confdence in the labelling and identifcation
of specifc types of biofuel The criteria should
Brazil TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2010 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
12900000 tonnes
cover the lifecycle CO2 emissions and impacts
on natural habitats as well as socio-economic
factors such as the availability of food for the
local population where feedstocks are produced
In 2007 the Dutch Government announced
sustainability criteria and has proposed a system
to enable traceability of feedstocks by 2020
The UK Government has proposed that 80 of
biofuels meet sustainability standards including
European demand for biodiesel feedstock
98 of Indonesiarsquos raises palm oil price natural rainforest will causing deforestation be degraded or gone by 2022
India TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 20 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
240000 tonnes
Sources FOLicht UN
CO2 reduction requirements by 2010ndash11 The
EU is developing sustainability criteria
Business is also developing sustainability
standards through initiatives such as the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (chaired by
Unilever) and the Roundtable on Sustainable
Biofuels The latter aims to launch draft
sustainability standards in early 2008
Sources FOLicht UN
[10] biofuelS eNeRGY DeliveRY(x 1000 litres of diesel equivalent per hectare)
Source FNR
1013 25
4054
Biomethane(energy crops)
Biomass- to-liquid
Bioethanol(wheat)
Biodiesel(rapeseed oil)
Bioethanol(sugar cane)
Sustainability criteria
The social and environmental impacts
of biofuels vary considerably
depending on the type of feedstock
used where it is grown and the processes
needed to turn it into biofuels
Sustainability criteria are required to provide
confdence in the labelling and identifcation
of specifc types of biofuel The criteria should
100
[5] co2 ReDucTioN of biofuelS coMPAReD WiTh foSSil fuelS ()
Source IEA Energy Technology Perspective 2006
Bioethanol (corn) USA
Bioethanol (wheat)
EU
Biomass to liquid(2nd generation)
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Brazil
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
EU
Fossil fuel
lt10 40-6087
100
1030
[7] RAiNfoReST DefoReSTATioN iMPAcTScarbon storage and co2 emissions per hectare in Se Asia
Sources see back page
RainforestCarbon stored above ground
230tonnescarbon
DeforestationCarbon released as CO2 due to clearing
and burning
830tonnes
CO2
Palm plantationsStores only 20 of carbon per hectare compared to rain-
forest (equivalent to 165 tonnes CO2)
48tonnescarbon
[6] biofuelS SAviNGSbiofuels cost per tonne GhG reduction ($ per tonne co2 equivalent)
Source IEA Biofuels for transportation An international perspective 2004
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Bioethanol (corn)
Bioethanol (grain)
Bioethanol (cellulose)
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
Biodiesel (biomass)
0 200 400 600 800-50
2002Post 2010
[8] PRoJecTeD GRoWTh iN fooD coNSuMPTioN
Source OECD-FAO 2006
-
-
-
-
-
-
2004 2009 2014 2019
100
110
120
130
140
150 Oil and oilseed meals
SugarMeat
CerealsDairy
1st generation biofuel 2nd generation biofuel
cover the lifecycle CO2 emissions and impacts
on natural habitats as well as socio-economic
factors such as the availability of food for the
local population where feedstocks are produced
In 2007 the Dutch Government announced
sustainability criteria and has proposed a system
to enable traceability of feedstocks by 2020
The UK Government has proposed that 80 of
biofuels meet sustainability standards including
CO2 reduction requirements by 2010ndash11 The
EU is developing sustainability criteria
Business is also developing sustainability
standards through initiatives such as the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (chaired by
Unilever) and the Roundtable on Sustainable
Biofuels The latter aims to launch draft
sustainability standards in early 2008
90
2015
2015
[9] PRoPoRTioN of cRoP uSeD foR biofuelS ()
Source The German Marshall Fund of the USA
Brazil sugarcane USA corn
EU rapeseedEU cereals
1995 1995
19951995
2005 2005
20052005
2015
2015
39
45
lt15
20
60
43
16
70
20
0
50USATARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2030 30 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
11800000 tonnes
USA accounts for 15 of global biodiesel production
ChinaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 15 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
800000 tonnes
China has imposed a moratorium on projects making bioethanol fuel from corn and other basic food crops
BrazilTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2010 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
12900000 tonnes
IndiaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 20 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
240000 tonnes
EUTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
730000 tonnes
Europe accounts for 85 of global biodiesel production
Reduction in US land used for food crops pushes production elsewhere potentially causing deforestation
Brazil sugarcane and soybean
European demand for biodiesel feedstock raises palm oil price causing deforestation
Europe doesnrsquot have enough land to meet its biofuels targets and will be dependent on imports
USA corn wheat and soybean
Bioethanol production has pushed up corn prices sparking protests in Mexico
The worldrsquos poorest are already being affected by higher food prices
98 of Indonesiarsquos natural rainforest will be degraded or gone by 2022
KEY
Issues with food security
Issues with GHGs
Issues with sustainability
Issues with trade
Areas of tropical rainforest
Trade
Unintended consequences
Feedstocks
Europe rapeseed oil and wheat
unintended consequencesBiofuels could help boost rural development while reducing CO2 emissions and reliance on crude oil But if biofuel strategies are not fully evaluated they could do more harm than good stimulating poor performing biofuels and stifing innovation
CO2 performance
Biofuels can help fght climate change
but CO2 savings vary signifcantly
between fuels (see graphic 5)
This is because the amount of energy needed
to produce different feedstocks (type of
crop and where it is grown) and to process
them into fuels varies considerably For
example using US corn it takes 06ndash08
litres of fossil fuels to produce an amount of
bioethanol equivalent to 1 litre of mineral
oil whereas it takes less than 01 litres of
fossil fuels to produce the same amount of
bioethanol using Brazilian sugarcane15
1500 and 4600 litres of water18 to produce
just one litre of bioethanol There are already
water shortages in many regions and population
growth and climate change will further increase
competition for clean water and increase its cost
Land-use and food availability
The worldrsquos population is rapidly
increasing and is expected to exceed
9 billion19 by 2050 To feed this
growing population will require 50 more food
in the next 20 years
While higher food prices will beneft some
producers they negatively impact the economies
of food-importing countries Poor people who
spend a large proportion of their income on
food will suffer disproportionately compared
with the wealthy Mexico has already experienced
some of the negative consequences of the
growing US bioethanol industry In 2006
Mexicans took to the streets to protest at the
high price of tortillas (a corn bread staple) made
more expensive by demand for maize from USA
bioethanol producers
In 2007 the UN World Food Programme which
fghts famine in Africa announced that it could
no longer afford to maintain its current level of
support due to high commodity prices Its food
purchasing costs rose by almost 50 between
2002 and 2007 854 million23 people suffer from
hunger and this is increasing by an average of
4 million a year at current trends Increasing
food prices will mean that even more people will
depend on food aid
Land is a fnite resource
Some biofuels are much more land
effcient than others because of
higher feedstock yields per hectare and
more effcient production processes (see graphic
10) If we are to feed a growing population using
the fnite amount of agricultural land available
it is vital that governments choose to promote
biofuels that deliver the maximum possible
energy per hectare
First-generation biofuels
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from non-tropical
feedstocks (rape wheat and corn) are not land
effcient It would require a minimum of 26 of
the worldrsquos arable land to run just 20 of its cars
on these fuels
[11] GlobAl iMPAcTS AND uNiNTeNDeD coNSeQueNceS
Second-generation biofuels produce even
less CO2 as their feedstocks require fewer
agricultural inputs and production processes
are much more effcient
Biofuels cost more than petrol or diesel per
unit of energy because of the high cost of
feedstocks and production Using biodiesel
and bioethanol from crops grown in Europe
and the USA as a carbon reduction strategy
will cost around $200-$250 per tonne of
CO2 avoided at 2004 prices The cost of
bioethanol from sugarcane as in Brazil
can be comparable to that of fossil fuels
(see graphic 6) Bioethanol from cellulose
(a second-generation biofuel) could already
provide CO2 reductions at less than $200 a
tonne It is likely to remain expensive to
reduce CO2 using biodiesel and bioethanol
from US and European crops even after
2010 The cost of using second-generation
biofuels could come down to under $100 a
tonne with large-scale production
As more governments encourage the use of
biofuels and set mandatory targets demand
will outstrip supply leading to higher prices
for frst- and second-generation biofuels
Deforestation and land-use change
The demand for soya and palm oil
threatens rainforests in Brazil
Indonesia and Malaysia which
are being cleared for plantations These oils
are used by a number of industries but the
growth in biodiesel production is increasing
demand signifcantly
Rainforests store large amounts of carbon
above ground and in the soil which is
released when they are cleared (see
graphic 7) A much smaller amount of carbon
is absorbed by the plantations which replace
the forests This means biofuels grown in
tropical countries can contribute more to
climate change than fossil fuels when their
land-use impact is taken into account
Studies have shown that biodiesel made from
palm oil produces three16 to ten17 times more
CO2 than an equivalent amount of fossil
fuel The situation is even worse for biodiesel
made from soya as the crop yields less oil
and stores less carbon than palm plantations
Peat lands wetlands and grasslands also
release large amounts of carbon if converted
to agricultural use Most biodiesel is made
from rapeseed oil rather than palm oil and
soya bean oil But as an increasing share of
rapeseed oil is used for fuels rather than for
food more soya and palm is being planted
to compensate
Deforestation and land-use change means
that while biofuels can appear to help
governments meet their national greenhouse
gas emissions reduction targets they could in
reality be more damaging to climate change
globally when land-use impact is considered
This means that it is vital for national policies
to take into account the full life-cycle climate
impact of different biofuels
Biodiversity loss
The destruction of tropical forests
and grasslands to make way for
soya and palm plantations causes
signifcant destruction of plant and animal
species including endangered species such
as the orang-utan
Biofuel feedstocks are often grown as a
single crop over a wide area Known as
monoculture this brings high yields but
harms biodiversity These impacts can be
reduced to an extent through mixed planting
and leaving wild areas
Water scarcity
Both frst and second-generation
biofuels require large amounts of
water to grow and process the
feedstocks For example it takes between
In the past farmers have increased production
to meet growing demands But they are now
fnding it hard to keep up ndash in three of the four
years20 between 2003 and 2007 demand for
grains to feed people and livestock outstripped
supply As countries such as China and India
develop more people can afford meat and dairy
products This is driving up demand for agricultural
commodities The booming biofuels industry is
contributing further to this escalation in demand
First-generation biofuels compete with food
crops leading to rising food prices In future this
could jeopardise the worldrsquos ability to feed its
growing population Many other industries also
rely on raw materials like palm oil which are
being diverted to biofuel production
Increased demand higher prices
The biofuels industry is using an
increasing share of the worldrsquos food
crops (see graphic 9) which is driving
up prices Global food prices rose by 1021 in
2006 due to an increase in corn wheat and soya
bean oil prices Prices are predicted to rise by
20ndash5022 over the next decade (compared with
average levels over the last ten years)
Demand for biofuel feedstock increases prices
of other crops For example high demand for
corn to make bioethanol means US farmers are
producing less soya and wheat which is boosting
prices for those crops Biofuels are also raising
meat and dairy prices by pushing up the price of
animal feed
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from palm oil
and sugarcane are more land effcient but
there is limited potential to expand production
of the feedstocks without causing signifcant
environmental damage through loss of natural
forests and grasslands
Second-generation biofuels
To run 20 of the worldrsquos vehicles on second-
generation biofuels would require 7 of its
arable land The feedstocks for these fuels can
also be grown on other types of land such as
pastures and forests
Trade
Even at todayrsquos high oil prices most
biofuels cannot compete on cost with
petrol and diesel Biofuel producers
rely on government subsidies for their profts
Governments are beginning to set mandatory
targets to stimulate investment and demand
for biofuels This is further boosting the price
of agricultural commodities and contributing to
trade distortions
In Brazil a well-established biofuel industry and
low production costs means Brazilian bioethanol
is cost competitive with petrol and diesel The
EU and the USA have set trade barriers to
protect domestic biofuel industries from cheap
Brazilian bioethanol imports This is encouraging
the development of less cost-effective and less
sustainable biofuels This makes it more diffcult
for those developing countries that are better
suited to biofuels production to compete on
world markets
Many governments have proposed mandatory
biofuel targets that exceed their countryrsquos
production and land capacity In future this
could make these countries dependent on
foreign imports which will undermine their
energy security Commodity prices will continue
to rise as competition increases for limited
global supplies
The unilever position Unilever supports sustainable biofuels that deliver social and environmental benefts across their entire lifecycle
Unilever supports renewable energy
initiatives that deliver benefts on a lifecycle
basis helping to combat climate change and
reduce dependency on fossil fuels Around
17 of the energy we use for our operations
comes from renewable sources
Why the issue matters to Unilever
Two-thirds of the raw materials we use
come from agriculture These materials are
essential to our business and Unilever has
a clear interest in how they are grown and
in securing future supplies That is why
we have worked to improve the social and
environmental standards of agriculture
for more than a decade Our sustainable
agriculture programmes include palm oil
oilseed rape sunfowers spinach tomatoes
and tea We are also a member of several
sustainability initiatives including the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil
Demand for biofuels feedstock has already
reduced the availability of raw materials and
driven up prices We are concerned that
increased demand will destabilise world
food supply and undermine sustainable
agriculture Use of vegetable oils such as
rapeseed oil for biofuels could also create
shortages driving consumers to less healthy
animal fats
Lifecycle analysis
Unilever believes that individual biofuels
should be examined carefully to ensure
that the unintended environmental
(deforestation and biodiversity loss) and
socio-economic (food security) consequences
do not undermine the positive impacts
Biofuels must also be evaluated across their
lifecycle to achieve genuine greenhouse gas
(GHG) reductions
Biomass is a valuable resource Using it
to generate heat and electricity is a more
effcient and cost-effective way of reducing
CO2 emissions than using it to make
transport fuels24 New vehicle technologies
such as electric and hybrid and more
effcient engines offer signifcant scope
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
from transport
First-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that some frst-generation
biofuels are neither environmentally effcient
nor cost-effective ways to reduce emissions
Many studies have shown that several frst-
generation biofuels have poor performance
with regard to reducing GHG emissions and
dependency on fossil fuels Some even cause
more GHG emissions than the fossil fuels
they replace25
We are concerned that the use of valuable
food crops for energy purposes will increase
pressure on ecosystems and biodiversity
Deforestation particularly to make way for
palm oil and soya beans could lead to the
devastation of the last remaining rainforests
in Borneo and the Amazon region
Second-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that the development
of second-generation biofuels that donrsquot
compete with food crops and have low
carbon emissions is essential The mainstream
market introduction of second-generation
biofuels would provide a strong incentive
for the application of renewable energy
technologies while minimising the negative
repercussions on food markets and food
security Unilever believes there is a strong
case for government and business investment
in new technologies and further research on
the sustainable use of biomass Support for
second-generation biofuels could be
accelerated through
n RampD facilitation and technology transfer
n Tax exemption andor subsidies
n Phasing out support for poor performing
frst-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels should be
required to achieve at least 50 GHG
savings compared to fossil fuels
Assessing sustainability
We believe governments worldwide have
the responsibility to subject their biofuel
policies to a full impact assessment These
assessments should cover environmental
social and economic impacts from the
regions of production to the end use
Policies which aim to reduce GHG emissions
should contain full lifecycle assessments for
individual biofuels This should ensure that
change in land use is included in the carbon
balance We propose that government
targets should be based on CO2 reductions
rather than volume as well as on availability
of feedstocks
Sustainability standards
Unilever believes sustainability criteria should
be introduced for the use of biomass within
energy programmes These should include
criteria at the production level as well as
criteria at a macro-level such as overall GHG
balance and energy effciency food security
and the protection of biodiversity and
ecosystems The use of biomass for energy
should not be stimulated by government
programmes without the application of
transparent sustainability criteria Proceeding
without these safeguards will risk unintended
consequences that could result in worse
climate change impacts natural habitat loss
and disruption of staple food supplies
Whatrsquos driving biofuels growthBiofuels have existed for over a hundred years ndash Henry Ford designed his Model T to run on bioethanol ndash but they have mostly been unable to compete with fuels derived from crude oil New government energy policies subsidies and tax exemptions are now stimulating biofuels production which has doubled since 1998 and is predicted to double again by 20115 There are a number of reasons why governments favour biofuels
Combating climate change
Transport is a signifcant contributor to
climate change accounting for around
25 of man-made greenhouse gas
emissions globally
In principle the use of biofuels can help
reduce transportrsquos impact on climate
change This is because the plants used
to make the fuels absorb carbon dioxide
(CO2) ndash the most important greenhouse
gas ndash as they grow The gas is later
released when the biofuels are used
However biofuels are not carbon neutral
It takes energy to grow and harvest the
plants and to process and distribute
biofuels The entire process emits CO2
and fertilisers emit nitrous oxide (N2O) a
powerful greenhouse gas (see graphic 4)
The amount of energy needed to make
different biofuels varies considerably This
makes it vital to take the entire production
process into account when assessing
the potential of biofuels to help reduce
transport CO2 emissions Read more about
CO2 performance overleaf
Technology and innovation
Unlike other renewable fuels such
as hydrogen the infrastructure to
manufacture and distribute biofuels is in
place today Biofuels are also compatible
with todayrsquos vehicles and power
generation technology
In 2006 $26 billion6 was invested in
biofuels The International Energy Agency
(IEA)7 estimates that between 2005 and
2030 it will cost $160 billion to expand
biofuel production to fuel 4 of global
road transport and $225 billion to fuel 7
Energy security
Global energy demands are increasing
rapidly The worldrsquos population has
doubled in the last four decades ndash to
around 66 billion in 2004 ndash and is
expected to exceed 9 billion8 by 2050
Rapid development particularly in China
and India is increasing wealth and this is
boosting demands for energy and transport
There were around 900 million vehicles
on the road in 2000 but this is forecast to
increase to over 2 billion by 20509
Fossil fuels (oil coal and gas) are
expected to be the dominant source of
energy for the foreseeable future But
production has already peaked in many
major oil-producing countries and new
developments are increasingly located in
environmentally challenging and politically
unstable parts of the world This has
resulted in high oil prices which the IEA
predicts will remain between $48ndash$62
until 203010 Some analysts predict 2030
prices could be as high as $10011 High oil
prices hit developing countries the hardest
ndash some spend six times as much on fuel as
on health12
Biofuels are seen by governments as a
secure source of energy and a way to
reduce reliance on imported fossil fuels
Brazil has replaced around 1513 of its
petrol consumption with bioethanol
according to the IEA The Washington Post puts this fgure at 4014
Rural development
Biofuels can help boost farm incomes
Globalisation and the industrialisation of
farming have reduced the price farmers
get for their produce Demand for the
agricultural commodities used to make
biofuels is reversing this trend In the
developed world this is creating jobs
and reducing the need for subsidies
for farmers
[4] biofuel co2 lifecYcle iMPAcTS
CO2
Fertilising
Harvesting Transporting
Processing
Transporting
Use
Growing
CO2
CO2 CO2
CO2
CO2
CO2
Energy
EnergyEnergy
EnergyEnergy
Energy
N2O
[2] fiRST-GeNeRATioN biofuelS bioDieSel Production process
Soybean oil
Diesel mix
Palm oil Rapeseed oil
Methyl esters
Transesterifcation
[1] fiRST-GeNeRATioN biofuelS bioeThANol Production process
Sugarcane
Sugar
Petrol mix
Corn
Starch
bioethanol
fermentation
biomass to liquid production process
Petrol mixDiesel mix
celluose ethanol production process
[3] SecoND-GeNeRATioN biofuelS
biochemical treatment
enzymatic hydrolysis
Sugar
fermentation
cellulose ethanol
Thermochemical treatmentgasifcation
Synthesis gas
Synthesis
hydrocarbons
Biomass including agricultural
residues
Special crops such as fast growing woody plants
Changes in government energy policies
are accelerating demand for liquid or
gaseous biofuels used in transport (see
facing page)
Transport biofuels can be distributed using
existing technology and used in todayrsquos
vehicles without modifcation when mixed
with petrol or diesel or in adapted vehicles
if used neat or in high concentrations
There are many different biofuels made
using a variety of production processes
and feedstocks There are two categories
First-generation biofuels made from
food crops These are widely used today
Second-generation biofuels made from
non-food crops These are in development
and will not be widely commercially
available for at least fve to ten years
First-generation biofuels
First-generation biofuels are made from
food crops including wheat rapeseed
corn soya and sugarcane
There are two main types of frst-generation
biofuels now in commercial use
Bioethanol Bioethanol is made by fermenting sugars
produced by plants (similar to beer and
wine production) Bioethanol accounts for
around 851 of global biofuel production
and is mainly produced from corn and
sugarcane
Bioethanol is usually blended with petrol ndash
todayrsquos fuel standards allow bioethanol to
be mixed with petrol in volumes up to 5
in Europe and 10 in the USA Bioethanol
can be used at higher concentrations
or neat For example in Brazil all petrol
contains at least 20ndash25 bioethanol and
many vehicles have been adapted to run
on 100 bioethanol
Bioethanol has a lower energy density
than petrol This makes it about 402 less
fuel effcient
defo
rest
atio
n la
nd-u
se ch
ange
hig
h fo
od p
rices
land
-use
cha
e h
igh
food
pric
es f
ood
shor
tage
s la
nd a
vaila
bilit
y
food
shortag
es land ava
ilability
trad
e dist
or
tions
rura
l dev
elop
men
t en
ergy
secu
rity
CO2 savi
ngs sust
ainab
ilit
y sta
ndar
ds
trad
e di
stor
tions
wat
er sh
orta
ges
biodi
versi
ty lo
ss
ener
gy s
ecur
ity C
O2
sav
ngs
sus
tain
abilit
y st
anda
rds
inno
vatio
ns
What are biofuelsBiofuels are made by processing food crops and other plants animal products or wastes (collectively known as biomass) These can be burnt to generate electricity or heat and are increasingly being used as transport fuels
PRoMoTiNG SuSTAiNAble biofuelS
Biodiesel Biodiesel is a blend of methyl esters (a type
of biofuel) and diesel Methyl esters are
produced by a chemical reaction between a
vegetable oil and an alcohol They are made
from rapeseed (primarily) palm oil and
soybean oil and account for around 153
of global biofuel production
Biodiesel is the most commonly used
biofuel in Europe where fuel standards
allow 5 blends USA fuel standards allow
blends of up to 204 Specially designed
vehicles can run on 100 biodiesel
Second-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels are made from
non-food feedstocks such as wood and
straw The production process uses the
whole plant rather than just the plant
starches or sugars that are used to make
frst-generation biofuels This means waste
materials from agricultural and forestry can
be used as feedstocks
There are a number of second-generation
biofuels under development These include
cellulose ethanol which is produced from
straw using enzymes and can be mixed
with petrol biomass-to-liquid fuel which
is made from wood feedstocks and can be
blended with diesel and biomethane a
gas made from organic material (such as
manure and straw) which can be used in
modifed petrol and diesel engines
Sources of information 1 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
2 International Energy Agency httpieaorgtextbasework2004 eswg21_NCVpdf
3 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
4 httpwwwbiodieselorgresourcesfuelfactsheetsstandards_ and_warrantiesshtm
5 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
6 United Nations Environment Programme Global Trends in Sustainable Energy Investment 2007
7 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
8 United Nations World Population to 2300 2004
9 World Business Council for Sustainable Development Energy amp Climate Change Facts and Trends to 2050 2004
10 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
11 Energy Information Administration Annual Energy Outlook 2007
12 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
13 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
14 Washington Post 200807
15 International Energy Agency Biofuels for Transport ndash An International Perspective 2004
16 Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ 2006
17 Delft Hydraulics
18 Based on Food and Agriculture Organization data available at wwwwaterfootprintorg
19 United Nations World Population to 2300 2004
20 Economist 23607
21 International Monetary Fund World Economic Report April 2007
22 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Food and Agriculture Organization Agricultural Outlook 2007-2016
23 Food and Agriculture Organization State of Food Insecurity in the World 2006
24 International Energy Agency Biofuels For Transport An International Perspective 2004
25 Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ (2006) and Delft Hydraulics
Rainforest Deforestation Impacts [7] graphic
Journal of Cleaner Production 2006 Palm Oil and the Emission of Carbon-Based Greenhouse Gases Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ
Journal of Tropical Forest Science 2005 An Assessment of Changes in Biomass Carbon Stocks in Tree Crops and Forests in Malaysia Henson IE
Oil World Annual 2007 ISTA Mielke GmbH
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Volume 2 Energy 2006
Writing and consultancy Context
Design and production Red Letter Design
Illustrations (Graphics 4 and 7) KJA-artistscom
Printing Scanplus (on paper made from responsibly managed forests)
Unilever NV Weena 455 PO Box 760 3000 DK Rotterdam The Netherlands T +31 (0)10 217 4000 F +31 (0)10 217 4798
Commercial Register Rotterdam Number 24051830
Unilever PLC PO Box 68 100 Victoria Embankment London EC4P 4BQ United Kingdom T +44 (0)20 7822 5252 F +44 (0)20 7822 5951
Unilever PLC registered offce Unilever PLC Port Sunlight Wirral Merseyside CH62 4ZD United Kingdom
Registered in England and Wales Company Number 41424
wwwunilevercom
Sources FOLicht UN
Sustainability criteria
The social and environmental impacts
of biofuels vary considerably
depending on the type of feedstock
used where it is grown and the processes
needed to turn it into biofuels
Sustainability criteria are required to provide
confdence in the labelling and identifcation
of specifc types of biofuel The criteria should
100
[5] co2 ReDucTioN of biofuelS coMPAReD WiTh foSSil fuelS ()
Source IEA Energy Technology Perspective 2006
Bioethanol (corn) USA
Bioethanol (wheat)
EU
Biomass to liquid(2nd generation)
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Brazil
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
EU
Fossil fuel
lt10 40-6087
100
1030
[7] RAiNfoReST DefoReSTATioN iMPAcTScarbon storage and co2 emissions per hectare in Se Asia
Sources see back page
RainforestCarbon stored above ground
230tonnescarbon
DeforestationCarbon released as CO2 due to clearing
and burning
830tonnes
CO2
Palm plantationsStores only 20 of carbon per hectare compared to rain-
forest (equivalent to 165 tonnes CO2)
48tonnescarbon
[6] biofuelS SAviNGSbiofuels cost per tonne GhG reduction ($ per tonne co2 equivalent)
Source IEA Biofuels for transportation An international perspective 2004
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Bioethanol (corn)
Bioethanol (grain)
Bioethanol (cellulose)
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
Biodiesel (biomass)
0 200 400 600 800-50
2002Post 2010
cover the lifecycle CO2 emissions and impacts
on natural habitats as well as socio-economic
factors such as the availability of food for the
local population where feedstocks are produced
In 2007 the Dutch Government announced
sustainability criteria and has proposed a system
to enable traceability of feedstocks by 2020
The UK Government has proposed that 80 of
biofuels meet sustainability standards including
CO2 reduction requirements by 2010ndash11 The
EU is developing sustainability criteria
Business is also developing sustainability
standards through initiatives such as the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (chaired by
Unilever) and the Roundtable on Sustainable
Biofuels The latter aims to launch draft
sustainability standards in early 2008
USATARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2030 30 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
11800000 tonnes
USA accounts for 15 of global biodiesel production
ChinaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 15 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
800000 tonnes
China has imposed a moratorium on projects making bioethanol fuel from corn and other basic food crops
BrazilTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2010 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
12900000 tonnes
IndiaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 20 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
240000 tonnes
EUTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
730000 tonnes
Europe accounts for 85 of global biodiesel production
Reduction in US land used for food crops pushes production elsewhere potentially causing deforestation
Brazil sugarcane and soybean
European demand for biodiesel feedstock raises palm oil price causing deforestation
Europe doesnrsquot have enough land to meet its biofuels targets and will be dependent on imports
USA corn wheat and soybean
Bioethanol production has pushed up corn prices sparking protests in Mexico
The worldrsquos poorest are already being affected by higher food prices
98 of Indonesiarsquos natural rainforest will be degraded or gone by 2022
KEY
Issues with food security
Issues with GHGs
Issues with sustainability
Issues with trade
Areas of tropical rainforest
Trade
Unintended consequences
Feedstocks
Europe rapeseed oil and wheat
The unilever positionUnilever supports sustainable biofuels that deliver social and environmental benefts across their entire lifecycle
Unilever supports renewable energy
initiatives that deliver benefts on a lifecycle
basis helping to combat climate change and
reduce dependency on fossil fuels Around
17 of the energy we use for our operations
comes from renewable sources
Why the issue matters to Unilever
Two-thirds of the raw materials we use
come from agriculture These materials are
essential to our business and Unilever has
a clear interest in how they are grown and
in securing future supplies That is why
we have worked to improve the social and
environmental standards of agriculture
for more than a decade Our sustainable
agriculture programmes include palm oil
oilseed rape sunfowers spinach tomatoes
and tea We are also a member of several
sustainability initiatives including the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil
Demand for biofuels feedstock has already
reduced the availability of raw materials and
driven up prices We are concerned that
increased demand will destabilise world
food supply and undermine sustainable
agriculture Use of vegetable oils such as
rapeseed oil for biofuels could also create
shortages driving consumers to less healthy
animal fats
Lifecycle analysis
Unilever believes that individual biofuels
should be examined carefully to ensure
that the unintended environmental
(deforestation and biodiversity loss) and
socio-economic (food security) consequences
do not undermine the positive impacts
Biofuels must also be evaluated across their
lifecycle to achieve genuine greenhouse gas
(GHG) reductions
Biomass is a valuable resource Using it
to generate heat and electricity is a more
effcient and cost-effective way of reducing
CO2 emissions than using it to make
transport fuels24 New vehicle technologies
such as electric and hybrid and more
effcient engines offer signifcant scope
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
from transport
First-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that some frst-generation
biofuels are neither environmentally effcient
nor cost-effective ways to reduce emissions
Many studies have shown that several frst-
generation biofuels have poor performance
with regard to reducing GHG emissions and
dependency on fossil fuels Some even cause
more GHG emissions than the fossil fuels
they replace25
We are concerned that the use of valuable
food crops for energy purposes will increase
pressure on ecosystems and biodiversity
Deforestation particularly to make way for
palm oil and soya beans could lead to the
devastation of the last remaining rainforests
in Borneo and the Amazon region
Second-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that the development
of second-generation biofuels that donrsquot
compete with food crops and have low
carbon emissions is essential The mainstream
market introduction of second-generation
biofuels would provide a strong incentive
for the application of renewable energy
technologies while minimising the negative
repercussions on food markets and food
security Unilever believes there is a strong
case for government and business investment
in new technologies and further research on
the sustainable use of biomass Support for
second-generation biofuels could be
accelerated through
n RampD facilitation and technology transfer
n Tax exemption andor subsidies
n Phasing out support for poor performing
frst-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels should be
required to achieve at least 50 GHG
savings compared to fossil fuels
Assessing sustainability
We believe governments worldwide have
the responsibility to subject their biofuel
policies to a full impact assessment These
assessments should cover environmental
social and economic impacts from the
regions of production to the end use
Policies which aim to reduce GHG emissions
should contain full lifecycle assessments for
individual biofuels This should ensure that
change in land use is included in the carbon
balance We propose that government
targets should be based on CO2 reductions
rather than volume as well as on availability
of feedstocks
Sustainability standards
Unilever believes sustainability criteria should
be introduced for the use of biomass within
energy programmes These should include
criteria at the production level as well as
criteria at a macro-level such as overall GHG
balance and energy effciency food security
and the protection of biodiversity and
ecosystems The use of biomass for energy
should not be stimulated by government
programmes without the application of
transparent sustainability criteria Proceeding
without these safeguards will risk unintended
consequences that could result in worse
climate change impacts natural habitat loss
and disruption of staple food supplies
unintended consequencesBiofuels could help boost rural development while reducing CO2 emissions and reliance on crude oil But if biofuel strategies are not fully evaluated they could do more harm than good stimulating poor performing biofuels and stifing innovation
CO2 performance
Biofuels can help fght climate change
but CO2 savings vary signifcantly
between fuels (see graphic 5)
This is because the amount of energy needed
to produce different feedstocks (type of
crop and where it is grown) and to process
them into fuels varies considerably For
example using US corn it takes 06ndash08
litres of fossil fuels to produce an amount of
bioethanol equivalent to 1 litre of mineral
oil whereas it takes less than 01 litres of
fossil fuels to produce the same amount of
bioethanol using Brazilian sugarcane15
[11] GlobAl iMPAcTS AND uNiNTeNDeD coNSeQueNceS
Second-generation biofuels produce even
less CO2 as their feedstocks require fewer
agricultural inputs and production processes
are much more effcient
Biofuels cost more than petrol or diesel per
unit of energy because of the high cost of
feedstocks and production Using biodiesel
and bioethanol from crops grown in Europe
and the USA as a carbon reduction strategy
will cost around $200-$250 per tonne of
CO2 avoided at 2004 prices The cost of
bioethanol from sugarcane as in Brazil
can be comparable to that of fossil fuels
(see graphic 6) Bioethanol from cellulose
(a second-generation biofuel) could already
provide CO2 reductions at less than $200 a
tonne It is likely to remain expensive to
reduce CO2 using biodiesel and bioethanol
from US and European crops even after
2010 The cost of using second-generation
biofuels could come down to under $100 a
tonne with large-scale production
As more governments encourage the use of
biofuels and set mandatory targets demand
will outstrip supply leading to higher prices
for frst- and second-generation biofuels
Deforestation and land-use change
The demand for soya and palm oil
threatens rainforests in Brazil
Indonesia and Malaysia which
are being cleared for plantations These oils
are used by a number of industries but the
growth in biodiesel production is increasing
demand signifcantly
Rainforests store large amounts of carbon
above ground and in the soil which is
released when they are cleared (see
graphic 7) A much smaller amount of carbon
is absorbed by the plantations which replace
the forests This means biofuels grown in
tropical countries can contribute more to
climate change than fossil fuels when their
land-use impact is taken into account
Studies have shown that biodiesel made from
palm oil produces three16 to ten17 times more
CO2 than an equivalent amount of fossil
fuel The situation is even worse for biodiesel
made from soya as the crop yields less oil
and stores less carbon than palm plantations
Peat lands wetlands and grasslands also
release large amounts of carbon if converted
to agricultural use Most biodiesel is made
from rapeseed oil rather than palm oil and
soya bean oil But as an increasing share of
rapeseed oil is used for fuels rather than for
food more soya and palm is being planted
to compensate
Deforestation and land-use change means
that while biofuels can appear to help
governments meet their national greenhouse
gas emissions reduction targets they could in
reality be more damaging to climate change
globally when land-use impact is considered
This means that it is vital for national policies
to take into account the full life-cycle climate
impact of different biofuels
Biodiversity loss
The destruction of tropical forests
and grasslands to make way for
soya and palm plantations causes
signifcant destruction of plant and animal
species including endangered species such
as the orang-utan
Biofuel feedstocks are often grown as a
single crop over a wide area Known as
monoculture this brings high yields but
harms biodiversity These impacts can be
reduced to an extent through mixed planting
and leaving wild areas
Water scarcity
Both frst and second-generation
biofuels require large amounts of
water to grow and process the
feedstocks For example it takes between
1500 and 4600 litres of water18 to produce [9] PRoPoRTioN of cRoP uSeD foR biofuelS () [10] biofuelS eNeRGY DeliveRY just one litre of bioethanol There are already
Brazil sugarcane USA corn (x 1000 litres of diesel equivalent per hectare)
water shortages in many regions and population Biodiesel Bioethanol
growth and climate change will further increase (rapeseed oil) (sugar cane)
competition for clean water and increase its cost 70 50
Land-use and food availability
The worldrsquos population is rapidly
increasing and is expected to exceed
9 billion19 by 2050 To feed this
growing population will require 50 more food
in the next 20 years
[8] PRoJecTeD GRoWTh iN fooD coNSuMPTioN
Oil and oilseed meals
150 -
140 -Sugar Meat
130 -Cereals Dairy
120 -
110 -
100 -
2004 2009 2014 2019
Source OECD-FAO 2006
In the past farmers have increased production
to meet growing demands But they are now
fnding it hard to keep up ndash in three of the four
years20 between 2003 and 2007 demand for
grains to feed people and livestock outstripped
supply As countries such as China and India
develop more people can afford meat and dairy
products This is driving up demand for agricultural
commodities The booming biofuels industry is
contributing further to this escalation in demand
First-generation biofuels compete with food
crops leading to rising food prices In future this
could jeopardise the worldrsquos ability to feed its
growing population Many other industries also
rely on raw materials like palm oil which are
being diverted to biofuel production
Increased demand higher prices
The biofuels industry is using an
increasing share of the worldrsquos food
crops (see graphic 9) which is driving
up prices Global food prices rose by 1021 in
2006 due to an increase in corn wheat and soya
bean oil prices Prices are predicted to rise by
20ndash5022 over the next decade (compared with
average levels over the last ten years)
Demand for biofuel feedstock increases prices
of other crops For example high demand for
corn to make bioethanol means US farmers are
producing less soya and wheat which is boosting
prices for those crops Biofuels are also raising
meat and dairy prices by pushing up the price of
animal feed
39 43 20
45
1995 2005 2015 1995 2005 2015
EU cereals EU rapeseed
90
60
20
0 16 lt15 1995 2005 20151995 2005 2015
Source The German Marshall Fund of the USA
While higher food prices will beneft some
producers they negatively impact the economies
of food-importing countries Poor people who
spend a large proportion of their income on
food will suffer disproportionately compared
with the wealthy Mexico has already experienced
some of the negative consequences of the
growing US bioethanol industry In 2006
Mexicans took to the streets to protest at the
high price of tortillas (a corn bread staple) made
more expensive by demand for maize from USA
bioethanol producers
In 2007 the UN World Food Programme which
fghts famine in Africa announced that it could
no longer afford to maintain its current level of
support due to high commodity prices Its food
purchasing costs rose by almost 50 between
2002 and 2007 854 million23 people suffer from
hunger and this is increasing by an average of
4 million a year at current trends Increasing
food prices will mean that even more people will
depend on food aid
Land is a fnite resource
Some biofuels are much more land
effcient than others because of
higher feedstock yields per hectare and
more effcient production processes (see graphic
10) If we are to feed a growing population using
the fnite amount of agricultural land available
it is vital that governments choose to promote
biofuels that deliver the maximum possible
energy per hectare
First-generation biofuels
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from non-tropical
feedstocks (rape wheat and corn) are not land
effcient It would require a minimum of 26 of
the worldrsquos arable land to run just 20 of its cars
on these fuels
104 405 13 25
Bioethanol Biomass- Biomethane (wheat) to-liquid (energy crops)
1st generation biofuel 2nd generation biofuel
Source FNR
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from palm oil
and sugarcane are more land effcient but
there is limited potential to expand production
of the feedstocks without causing signifcant
environmental damage through loss of natural
forests and grasslands
Second-generation biofuels
To run 20 of the worldrsquos vehicles on second-
generation biofuels would require 7 of its
arable land The feedstocks for these fuels can
also be grown on other types of land such as
pastures and forests
Trade
Even at todayrsquos high oil prices most
biofuels cannot compete on cost with
petrol and diesel Biofuel producers
rely on government subsidies for their profts
Governments are beginning to set mandatory
targets to stimulate investment and demand
for biofuels This is further boosting the price
of agricultural commodities and contributing to
trade distortions
In Brazil a well-established biofuel industry and
low production costs means Brazilian bioethanol
is cost competitive with petrol and diesel The
EU and the USA have set trade barriers to
protect domestic biofuel industries from cheap
Brazilian bioethanol imports This is encouraging
the development of less cost-effective and less
sustainable biofuels This makes it more diffcult
for those developing countries that are better
suited to biofuels production to compete on
world markets
Many governments have proposed mandatory
biofuel targets that exceed their countryrsquos
production and land capacity In future this
could make these countries dependent on
foreign imports which will undermine their
energy security Commodity prices will continue
to rise as competition increases for limited
global supplies
[10] biofuelS eNeRGY DeliveRY(x 1000 litres of diesel equivalent per hectare)
Source FNR
1013 25
4054
Biomethane(energy crops)
Biomass- to-liquid
Bioethanol(wheat)
Biodiesel(rapeseed oil)
Bioethanol(sugar cane)
100
[5] co2 ReDucTioN of biofuelS coMPAReD WiTh foSSil fuelS ()
Source IEA Energy Technology Perspective 2006
Bioethanol (corn) USA
Bioethanol (wheat)
EU
Biomass to liquid(2nd generation)
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Brazil
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
EU
Fossil fuel
lt10 40-6087
100
1030
[7] RAiNfoReST DefoReSTATioN iMPAcTScarbon storage and co2 emissions per hectare in Se Asia
Sources see back page
RainforestCarbon stored above ground
230tonnescarbon
DeforestationCarbon released as CO2 due to clearing
and burning
830tonnes
CO2
Palm plantationsStores only 20 of carbon per hectare compared to rain-
forest (equivalent to 165 tonnes CO2)
48tonnescarbon
[6] biofuelS SAviNGSbiofuels cost per tonne GhG reduction ($ per tonne co2 equivalent)
Source IEA Biofuels for transportation An international perspective 2004
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Bioethanol (corn)
Bioethanol (grain)
Bioethanol (cellulose)
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
Biodiesel (biomass)
0 200 400 600 800-50
2002Post 2010
[8] PRoJecTeD GRoWTh iN fooD coNSuMPTioN
Source OECD-FAO 2006
-
-
-
-
-
-
2004 2009 2014 2019
100
110
120
130
140
150 Oil and oilseed meals
SugarMeat
CerealsDairy
1st generation biofuel 2nd generation biofuel
90
2015
2015
[9] PRoPoRTioN of cRoP uSeD foR biofuelS ()
Source The German Marshall Fund of the USA
Brazil sugarcane USA corn
EU rapeseedEU cereals
1995 1995
19951995
2005 2005
20052005
2015
2015
39
45
lt15
20
60
43
16
70
20
0
50
The unilever positionUnilever supports sustainable biofuels that deliver social and environmental benefts across their entire lifecycle
Unilever supports renewable energy
initiatives that deliver benefts on a lifecycle
basis helping to combat climate change and
reduce dependency on fossil fuels Around
17 of the energy we use for our operations
comes from renewable sources
Why the issue matters to Unilever
Two-thirds of the raw materials we use
come from agriculture These materials are
essential to our business and Unilever has
a clear interest in how they are grown and
in securing future supplies That is why
we have worked to improve the social and
environmental standards of agriculture
for more than a decade Our sustainable
agriculture programmes include palm oil
oilseed rape sunfowers spinach tomatoes
and tea We are also a member of several
sustainability initiatives including the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil
Demand for biofuels feedstock has already
reduced the availability of raw materials and
driven up prices We are concerned that
increased demand will destabilise world
food supply and undermine sustainable
agriculture Use of vegetable oils such as
rapeseed oil for biofuels could also create
shortages driving consumers to less healthy
animal fats
Lifecycle analysis
Unilever believes that individual biofuels
should be examined carefully to ensure
that the unintended environmental
(deforestation and biodiversity loss) and
socio-economic (food security) consequences
do not undermine the positive impacts
Biofuels must also be evaluated across their
lifecycle to achieve genuine greenhouse gas
(GHG) reductions
Biomass is a valuable resource Using it
to generate heat and electricity is a more
effcient and cost-effective way of reducing
CO2 emissions than using it to make
transport fuels24 New vehicle technologies
such as electric and hybrid and more
effcient engines offer signifcant scope
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
from transport
First-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that some frst-generation
biofuels are neither environmentally effcient
nor cost-effective ways to reduce emissions
Many studies have shown that several frst-
generation biofuels have poor performance
with regard to reducing GHG emissions and
dependency on fossil fuels Some even cause
more GHG emissions than the fossil fuels
they replace25
We are concerned that the use of valuable
food crops for energy purposes will increase
pressure on ecosystems and biodiversity
Deforestation particularly to make way for
palm oil and soya beans could lead to the
devastation of the last remaining rainforests
in Borneo and the Amazon region
Second-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that the development
of second-generation biofuels that donrsquot
compete with food crops and have low
carbon emissions is essential The mainstream
market introduction of second-generation
biofuels would provide a strong incentive
for the application of renewable energy
technologies while minimising the negative
repercussions on food markets and food
security Unilever believes there is a strong
case for government and business investment
in new technologies and further research on
the sustainable use of biomass Support for
second-generation biofuels could be
accelerated through
n RampD facilitation and technology transfer
n Tax exemption andor subsidies
n Phasing out support for poor performing
frst-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels should be
required to achieve at least 50 GHG
savings compared to fossil fuels
Assessing sustainability
We believe governments worldwide have
the responsibility to subject their biofuel
policies to a full impact assessment These
assessments should cover environmental
social and economic impacts from the
regions of production to the end use
Policies which aim to reduce GHG emissions
should contain full lifecycle assessments for
individual biofuels This should ensure that
change in land use is included in the carbon
balance We propose that government
targets should be based on CO2 reductions
rather than volume as well as on availability
of feedstocks
Sustainability standards
Unilever believes sustainability criteria should
be introduced for the use of biomass within
energy programmes These should include
criteria at the production level as well as
criteria at a macro-level such as overall GHG
balance and energy effciency food security
and the protection of biodiversity and
ecosystems The use of biomass for energy
should not be stimulated by government
programmes without the application of
transparent sustainability criteria Proceeding
without these safeguards will risk unintended
consequences that could result in worse
climate change impacts natural habitat loss
and disruption of staple food supplies
unintended consequencesBiofuels could help boost rural development while reducing CO2 emissions and reliance on crude oil But if biofuel strategies are not fully evaluated they could do more harm than good stimulating poor performing biofuels and stifing innovation
CO2 performance
Biofuels can help fght climate change
but CO2 savings vary signifcantly
between fuels (see graphic 5)
This is because the amount of energy needed
to produce different feedstocks (type of
crop and where it is grown) and to process
them into fuels varies considerably For
example using US corn it takes 06ndash08
litres of fossil fuels to produce an amount of
bioethanol equivalent to 1 litre of mineral
oil whereas it takes less than 01 litres of
fossil fuels to produce the same amount of
bioethanol using Brazilian sugarcane15
1500 and 4600 litres of water18 to produce
just one litre of bioethanol There are already
water shortages in many regions and population
growth and climate change will further increase
competition for clean water and increase its cost
Land-use and food availability
The worldrsquos population is rapidly
increasing and is expected to exceed
9 billion19 by 2050 To feed this
growing population will require 50 more food
in the next 20 years
While higher food prices will beneft some
producers they negatively impact the economies
of food-importing countries Poor people who
spend a large proportion of their income on
food will suffer disproportionately compared
with the wealthy Mexico has already experienced
some of the negative consequences of the
growing US bioethanol industry In 2006
Mexicans took to the streets to protest at the
high price of tortillas (a corn bread staple) made
more expensive by demand for maize from USA
bioethanol producers
In 2007 the UN World Food Programme which
fghts famine in Africa announced that it could
no longer afford to maintain its current level of
support due to high commodity prices Its food
purchasing costs rose by almost 50 between
2002 and 2007 854 million23 people suffer from
hunger and this is increasing by an average of
4 million a year at current trends Increasing
food prices will mean that even more people will
depend on food aid
Land is a fnite resource
Some biofuels are much more land
effcient than others because of
higher feedstock yields per hectare and
more effcient production processes (see graphic
10) If we are to feed a growing population using
the fnite amount of agricultural land available
it is vital that governments choose to promote
biofuels that deliver the maximum possible
energy per hectare
First-generation biofuels
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from non-tropical
feedstocks (rape wheat and corn) are not land
effcient It would require a minimum of 26 of
the worldrsquos arable land to run just 20 of its cars
on these fuels
Second-generation biofuels produce even
less CO2 as their feedstocks require fewer
agricultural inputs and production processes
are much more effcient
Biofuels cost more than petrol or diesel per
unit of energy because of the high cost of
feedstocks and production Using biodiesel
and bioethanol from crops grown in Europe
and the USA as a carbon reduction strategy
will cost around $200-$250 per tonne of
CO2 avoided at 2004 prices The cost of
bioethanol from sugarcane as in Brazil
can be comparable to that of fossil fuels
(see graphic 6) Bioethanol from cellulose
(a second-generation biofuel) could already
provide CO2 reductions at less than $200 a
tonne It is likely to remain expensive to
reduce CO2 using biodiesel and bioethanol
from US and European crops even after
2010 The cost of using second-generation
biofuels could come down to under $100 a
tonne with large-scale production
As more governments encourage the use of
biofuels and set mandatory targets demand
will outstrip supply leading to higher prices
for frst- and second-generation biofuels
Deforestation and land-use change
The demand for soya and palm oil
threatens rainforests in Brazil
Indonesia and Malaysia which
are being cleared for plantations These oils
are used by a number of industries but the
growth in biodiesel production is increasing
demand signifcantly
Rainforests store large amounts of carbon
above ground and in the soil which is
released when they are cleared (see
graphic 7) A much smaller amount of carbon
is absorbed by the plantations which replace
the forests This means biofuels grown in
tropical countries can contribute more to
climate change than fossil fuels when their
land-use impact is taken into account
Studies have shown that biodiesel made from
palm oil produces three16 to ten17 times more
CO2 than an equivalent amount of fossil
fuel The situation is even worse for biodiesel
made from soya as the crop yields less oil
and stores less carbon than palm plantations
Peat lands wetlands and grasslands also
release large amounts of carbon if converted
to agricultural use Most biodiesel is made
from rapeseed oil rather than palm oil and
soya bean oil But as an increasing share of
rapeseed oil is used for fuels rather than for
food more soya and palm is being planted
to compensate
Deforestation and land-use change means
that while biofuels can appear to help
governments meet their national greenhouse
gas emissions reduction targets they could in
reality be more damaging to climate change
globally when land-use impact is considered
This means that it is vital for national policies
to take into account the full life-cycle climate
impact of different biofuels
Biodiversity loss
The destruction of tropical forests
and grasslands to make way for
soya and palm plantations causes
signifcant destruction of plant and animal
species including endangered species such
as the orang-utan
Biofuel feedstocks are often grown as a
single crop over a wide area Known as
monoculture this brings high yields but
harms biodiversity These impacts can be
reduced to an extent through mixed planting
and leaving wild areas
Water scarcity
Both frst and second-generation
biofuels require large amounts of
water to grow and process the
feedstocks For example it takes between
In the past farmers have increased production
to meet growing demands But they are now
fnding it hard to keep up ndash in three of the four
years20 between 2003 and 2007 demand for
grains to feed people and livestock outstripped
supply As countries such as China and India
develop more people can afford meat and dairy
products This is driving up demand for agricultural
commodities The booming biofuels industry is
contributing further to this escalation in demand
First-generation biofuels compete with food
crops leading to rising food prices In future this
could jeopardise the worldrsquos ability to feed its
growing population Many other industries also
rely on raw materials like palm oil which are
being diverted to biofuel production
Increased demand higher prices
The biofuels industry is using an
increasing share of the worldrsquos food
crops (see graphic 9) which is driving
up prices Global food prices rose by 1021 in
2006 due to an increase in corn wheat and soya
bean oil prices Prices are predicted to rise by
20ndash5022 over the next decade (compared with
average levels over the last ten years)
Demand for biofuel feedstock increases prices
of other crops For example high demand for
corn to make bioethanol means US farmers are
producing less soya and wheat which is boosting
prices for those crops Biofuels are also raising
meat and dairy prices by pushing up the price of
animal feed
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from palm oil
and sugarcane are more land effcient but
there is limited potential to expand production
of the feedstocks without causing signifcant
environmental damage through loss of natural
forests and grasslands
Second-generation biofuels
To run 20 of the worldrsquos vehicles on second-
generation biofuels would require 7 of its
arable land The feedstocks for these fuels can
also be grown on other types of land such as
pastures and forests
Trade
Even at todayrsquos high oil prices most
biofuels cannot compete on cost with
petrol and diesel Biofuel producers
rely on government subsidies for their profts
Governments are beginning to set mandatory
targets to stimulate investment and demand
for biofuels This is further boosting the price
of agricultural commodities and contributing to
trade distortions
In Brazil a well-established biofuel industry and
low production costs means Brazilian bioethanol
is cost competitive with petrol and diesel The
EU and the USA have set trade barriers to
protect domestic biofuel industries from cheap
Brazilian bioethanol imports This is encouraging
the development of less cost-effective and less
sustainable biofuels This makes it more diffcult
for those developing countries that are better
suited to biofuels production to compete on
world markets
Many governments have proposed mandatory
biofuel targets that exceed their countryrsquos
production and land capacity In future this
could make these countries dependent on
foreign imports which will undermine their
energy security Commodity prices will continue
to rise as competition increases for limited
global supplies
[11] GlobAl iMPAcTS AND uNiNTeNDeD coNSeQueNceS
USA TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2030 30 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
11800000 tonnes
USA accounts for 15 of global biodiesel production
EU TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
730000 tonnes
Europe accounts for 85 of global biodiesel production
China TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 15 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
800000 tonnes
China has imposed a moratorium on projects making bioethanol fuel from corn and other basic food crops
USA corn wheat and soybean
Reduction in US land Bioethanol production used for food crops has pushed up corn pushes production prices sparking elsewhere potentially protests in Mexico causing deforestation
Europe doesnrsquot have enough land to meet its biofuels targets Europe rapeseed oil and wheatand will be dependent on imports
The worldrsquos poorest are already being affected by higher food prices
Brazil sugarcane and soybean
KEY
Issues with food security
Issues with GHGs
Issues with sustainability
Issues with trade
Feedstocks
Areas of tropical rainforest
Trade
Unintended consequences
Sustainability criteria
The social and environmental impacts
of biofuels vary considerably
depending on the type of feedstock
used where it is grown and the processes
needed to turn it into biofuels
Sustainability criteria are required to provide
confdence in the labelling and identifcation
of specifc types of biofuel The criteria should
Brazil TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2010 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
12900000 tonnes
cover the lifecycle CO2 emissions and impacts
on natural habitats as well as socio-economic
factors such as the availability of food for the
local population where feedstocks are produced
In 2007 the Dutch Government announced
sustainability criteria and has proposed a system
to enable traceability of feedstocks by 2020
The UK Government has proposed that 80 of
biofuels meet sustainability standards including
European demand for biodiesel feedstock
98 of Indonesiarsquos raises palm oil price natural rainforest will causing deforestation be degraded or gone by 2022
India TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 20 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
240000 tonnes
Sources FOLicht UN
CO2 reduction requirements by 2010ndash11 The
EU is developing sustainability criteria
Business is also developing sustainability
standards through initiatives such as the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (chaired by
Unilever) and the Roundtable on Sustainable
Biofuels The latter aims to launch draft
sustainability standards in early 2008
Sources FOLicht UN
[10] biofuelS eNeRGY DeliveRY(x 1000 litres of diesel equivalent per hectare)
Source FNR
1013 25
4054
Biomethane(energy crops)
Biomass- to-liquid
Bioethanol(wheat)
Biodiesel(rapeseed oil)
Bioethanol(sugar cane)
Sustainability criteria
The social and environmental impacts
of biofuels vary considerably
depending on the type of feedstock
used where it is grown and the processes
needed to turn it into biofuels
Sustainability criteria are required to provide
confdence in the labelling and identifcation
of specifc types of biofuel The criteria should
100
[5] co2 ReDucTioN of biofuelS coMPAReD WiTh foSSil fuelS ()
Source IEA Energy Technology Perspective 2006
Bioethanol (corn) USA
Bioethanol (wheat)
EU
Biomass to liquid(2nd generation)
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Brazil
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
EU
Fossil fuel
lt10 40-6087
100
1030
[7] RAiNfoReST DefoReSTATioN iMPAcTScarbon storage and co2 emissions per hectare in Se Asia
Sources see back page
RainforestCarbon stored above ground
230tonnescarbon
DeforestationCarbon released as CO2 due to clearing
and burning
830tonnes
CO2
Palm plantationsStores only 20 of carbon per hectare compared to rain-
forest (equivalent to 165 tonnes CO2)
48tonnescarbon
[6] biofuelS SAviNGSbiofuels cost per tonne GhG reduction ($ per tonne co2 equivalent)
Source IEA Biofuels for transportation An international perspective 2004
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Bioethanol (corn)
Bioethanol (grain)
Bioethanol (cellulose)
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
Biodiesel (biomass)
0 200 400 600 800-50
2002Post 2010
[8] PRoJecTeD GRoWTh iN fooD coNSuMPTioN
Source OECD-FAO 2006
-
-
-
-
-
-
2004 2009 2014 2019
100
110
120
130
140
150 Oil and oilseed meals
SugarMeat
CerealsDairy
1st generation biofuel 2nd generation biofuel
cover the lifecycle CO2 emissions and impacts
on natural habitats as well as socio-economic
factors such as the availability of food for the
local population where feedstocks are produced
In 2007 the Dutch Government announced
sustainability criteria and has proposed a system
to enable traceability of feedstocks by 2020
The UK Government has proposed that 80 of
biofuels meet sustainability standards including
CO2 reduction requirements by 2010ndash11 The
EU is developing sustainability criteria
Business is also developing sustainability
standards through initiatives such as the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (chaired by
Unilever) and the Roundtable on Sustainable
Biofuels The latter aims to launch draft
sustainability standards in early 2008
90
2015
2015
[9] PRoPoRTioN of cRoP uSeD foR biofuelS ()
Source The German Marshall Fund of the USA
Brazil sugarcane USA corn
EU rapeseedEU cereals
1995 1995
19951995
2005 2005
20052005
2015
2015
39
45
lt15
20
60
43
16
70
20
0
50USATARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2030 30 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
11800000 tonnes
USA accounts for 15 of global biodiesel production
ChinaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 15 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
800000 tonnes
China has imposed a moratorium on projects making bioethanol fuel from corn and other basic food crops
BrazilTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2010 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
12900000 tonnes
IndiaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 20 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
240000 tonnes
EUTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
730000 tonnes
Europe accounts for 85 of global biodiesel production
Reduction in US land used for food crops pushes production elsewhere potentially causing deforestation
Brazil sugarcane and soybean
European demand for biodiesel feedstock raises palm oil price causing deforestation
Europe doesnrsquot have enough land to meet its biofuels targets and will be dependent on imports
USA corn wheat and soybean
Bioethanol production has pushed up corn prices sparking protests in Mexico
The worldrsquos poorest are already being affected by higher food prices
98 of Indonesiarsquos natural rainforest will be degraded or gone by 2022
KEY
Issues with food security
Issues with GHGs
Issues with sustainability
Issues with trade
Areas of tropical rainforest
Trade
Unintended consequences
Feedstocks
Europe rapeseed oil and wheat
unintended consequencesBiofuels could help boost rural development while reducing CO2 emissions and reliance on crude oil But if biofuel strategies are not fully evaluated they could do more harm than good stimulating poor performing biofuels and stifing innovation
CO2 performance
Biofuels can help fght climate change
but CO2 savings vary signifcantly
between fuels (see graphic 5)
This is because the amount of energy needed
to produce different feedstocks (type of
crop and where it is grown) and to process
them into fuels varies considerably For
example using US corn it takes 06ndash08
litres of fossil fuels to produce an amount of
bioethanol equivalent to 1 litre of mineral
oil whereas it takes less than 01 litres of
fossil fuels to produce the same amount of
bioethanol using Brazilian sugarcane15
1500 and 4600 litres of water18 to produce
just one litre of bioethanol There are already
water shortages in many regions and population
growth and climate change will further increase
competition for clean water and increase its cost
Land-use and food availability
The worldrsquos population is rapidly
increasing and is expected to exceed
9 billion19 by 2050 To feed this
growing population will require 50 more food
in the next 20 years
While higher food prices will beneft some
producers they negatively impact the economies
of food-importing countries Poor people who
spend a large proportion of their income on
food will suffer disproportionately compared
with the wealthy Mexico has already experienced
some of the negative consequences of the
growing US bioethanol industry In 2006
Mexicans took to the streets to protest at the
high price of tortillas (a corn bread staple) made
more expensive by demand for maize from USA
bioethanol producers
In 2007 the UN World Food Programme which
fghts famine in Africa announced that it could
no longer afford to maintain its current level of
support due to high commodity prices Its food
purchasing costs rose by almost 50 between
2002 and 2007 854 million23 people suffer from
hunger and this is increasing by an average of
4 million a year at current trends Increasing
food prices will mean that even more people will
depend on food aid
Land is a fnite resource
Some biofuels are much more land
effcient than others because of
higher feedstock yields per hectare and
more effcient production processes (see graphic
10) If we are to feed a growing population using
the fnite amount of agricultural land available
it is vital that governments choose to promote
biofuels that deliver the maximum possible
energy per hectare
First-generation biofuels
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from non-tropical
feedstocks (rape wheat and corn) are not land
effcient It would require a minimum of 26 of
the worldrsquos arable land to run just 20 of its cars
on these fuels
[11] GlobAl iMPAcTS AND uNiNTeNDeD coNSeQueNceS
Second-generation biofuels produce even
less CO2 as their feedstocks require fewer
agricultural inputs and production processes
are much more effcient
Biofuels cost more than petrol or diesel per
unit of energy because of the high cost of
feedstocks and production Using biodiesel
and bioethanol from crops grown in Europe
and the USA as a carbon reduction strategy
will cost around $200-$250 per tonne of
CO2 avoided at 2004 prices The cost of
bioethanol from sugarcane as in Brazil
can be comparable to that of fossil fuels
(see graphic 6) Bioethanol from cellulose
(a second-generation biofuel) could already
provide CO2 reductions at less than $200 a
tonne It is likely to remain expensive to
reduce CO2 using biodiesel and bioethanol
from US and European crops even after
2010 The cost of using second-generation
biofuels could come down to under $100 a
tonne with large-scale production
As more governments encourage the use of
biofuels and set mandatory targets demand
will outstrip supply leading to higher prices
for frst- and second-generation biofuels
Deforestation and land-use change
The demand for soya and palm oil
threatens rainforests in Brazil
Indonesia and Malaysia which
are being cleared for plantations These oils
are used by a number of industries but the
growth in biodiesel production is increasing
demand signifcantly
Rainforests store large amounts of carbon
above ground and in the soil which is
released when they are cleared (see
graphic 7) A much smaller amount of carbon
is absorbed by the plantations which replace
the forests This means biofuels grown in
tropical countries can contribute more to
climate change than fossil fuels when their
land-use impact is taken into account
Studies have shown that biodiesel made from
palm oil produces three16 to ten17 times more
CO2 than an equivalent amount of fossil
fuel The situation is even worse for biodiesel
made from soya as the crop yields less oil
and stores less carbon than palm plantations
Peat lands wetlands and grasslands also
release large amounts of carbon if converted
to agricultural use Most biodiesel is made
from rapeseed oil rather than palm oil and
soya bean oil But as an increasing share of
rapeseed oil is used for fuels rather than for
food more soya and palm is being planted
to compensate
Deforestation and land-use change means
that while biofuels can appear to help
governments meet their national greenhouse
gas emissions reduction targets they could in
reality be more damaging to climate change
globally when land-use impact is considered
This means that it is vital for national policies
to take into account the full life-cycle climate
impact of different biofuels
Biodiversity loss
The destruction of tropical forests
and grasslands to make way for
soya and palm plantations causes
signifcant destruction of plant and animal
species including endangered species such
as the orang-utan
Biofuel feedstocks are often grown as a
single crop over a wide area Known as
monoculture this brings high yields but
harms biodiversity These impacts can be
reduced to an extent through mixed planting
and leaving wild areas
Water scarcity
Both frst and second-generation
biofuels require large amounts of
water to grow and process the
feedstocks For example it takes between
In the past farmers have increased production
to meet growing demands But they are now
fnding it hard to keep up ndash in three of the four
years20 between 2003 and 2007 demand for
grains to feed people and livestock outstripped
supply As countries such as China and India
develop more people can afford meat and dairy
products This is driving up demand for agricultural
commodities The booming biofuels industry is
contributing further to this escalation in demand
First-generation biofuels compete with food
crops leading to rising food prices In future this
could jeopardise the worldrsquos ability to feed its
growing population Many other industries also
rely on raw materials like palm oil which are
being diverted to biofuel production
Increased demand higher prices
The biofuels industry is using an
increasing share of the worldrsquos food
crops (see graphic 9) which is driving
up prices Global food prices rose by 1021 in
2006 due to an increase in corn wheat and soya
bean oil prices Prices are predicted to rise by
20ndash5022 over the next decade (compared with
average levels over the last ten years)
Demand for biofuel feedstock increases prices
of other crops For example high demand for
corn to make bioethanol means US farmers are
producing less soya and wheat which is boosting
prices for those crops Biofuels are also raising
meat and dairy prices by pushing up the price of
animal feed
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from palm oil
and sugarcane are more land effcient but
there is limited potential to expand production
of the feedstocks without causing signifcant
environmental damage through loss of natural
forests and grasslands
Second-generation biofuels
To run 20 of the worldrsquos vehicles on second-
generation biofuels would require 7 of its
arable land The feedstocks for these fuels can
also be grown on other types of land such as
pastures and forests
Trade
Even at todayrsquos high oil prices most
biofuels cannot compete on cost with
petrol and diesel Biofuel producers
rely on government subsidies for their profts
Governments are beginning to set mandatory
targets to stimulate investment and demand
for biofuels This is further boosting the price
of agricultural commodities and contributing to
trade distortions
In Brazil a well-established biofuel industry and
low production costs means Brazilian bioethanol
is cost competitive with petrol and diesel The
EU and the USA have set trade barriers to
protect domestic biofuel industries from cheap
Brazilian bioethanol imports This is encouraging
the development of less cost-effective and less
sustainable biofuels This makes it more diffcult
for those developing countries that are better
suited to biofuels production to compete on
world markets
Many governments have proposed mandatory
biofuel targets that exceed their countryrsquos
production and land capacity In future this
could make these countries dependent on
foreign imports which will undermine their
energy security Commodity prices will continue
to rise as competition increases for limited
global supplies
The unilever position Unilever supports sustainable biofuels that deliver social and environmental benefts across their entire lifecycle
Unilever supports renewable energy
initiatives that deliver benefts on a lifecycle
basis helping to combat climate change and
reduce dependency on fossil fuels Around
17 of the energy we use for our operations
comes from renewable sources
Why the issue matters to Unilever
Two-thirds of the raw materials we use
come from agriculture These materials are
essential to our business and Unilever has
a clear interest in how they are grown and
in securing future supplies That is why
we have worked to improve the social and
environmental standards of agriculture
for more than a decade Our sustainable
agriculture programmes include palm oil
oilseed rape sunfowers spinach tomatoes
and tea We are also a member of several
sustainability initiatives including the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil
Demand for biofuels feedstock has already
reduced the availability of raw materials and
driven up prices We are concerned that
increased demand will destabilise world
food supply and undermine sustainable
agriculture Use of vegetable oils such as
rapeseed oil for biofuels could also create
shortages driving consumers to less healthy
animal fats
Lifecycle analysis
Unilever believes that individual biofuels
should be examined carefully to ensure
that the unintended environmental
(deforestation and biodiversity loss) and
socio-economic (food security) consequences
do not undermine the positive impacts
Biofuels must also be evaluated across their
lifecycle to achieve genuine greenhouse gas
(GHG) reductions
Biomass is a valuable resource Using it
to generate heat and electricity is a more
effcient and cost-effective way of reducing
CO2 emissions than using it to make
transport fuels24 New vehicle technologies
such as electric and hybrid and more
effcient engines offer signifcant scope
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
from transport
First-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that some frst-generation
biofuels are neither environmentally effcient
nor cost-effective ways to reduce emissions
Many studies have shown that several frst-
generation biofuels have poor performance
with regard to reducing GHG emissions and
dependency on fossil fuels Some even cause
more GHG emissions than the fossil fuels
they replace25
We are concerned that the use of valuable
food crops for energy purposes will increase
pressure on ecosystems and biodiversity
Deforestation particularly to make way for
palm oil and soya beans could lead to the
devastation of the last remaining rainforests
in Borneo and the Amazon region
Second-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that the development
of second-generation biofuels that donrsquot
compete with food crops and have low
carbon emissions is essential The mainstream
market introduction of second-generation
biofuels would provide a strong incentive
for the application of renewable energy
technologies while minimising the negative
repercussions on food markets and food
security Unilever believes there is a strong
case for government and business investment
in new technologies and further research on
the sustainable use of biomass Support for
second-generation biofuels could be
accelerated through
n RampD facilitation and technology transfer
n Tax exemption andor subsidies
n Phasing out support for poor performing
frst-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels should be
required to achieve at least 50 GHG
savings compared to fossil fuels
Assessing sustainability
We believe governments worldwide have
the responsibility to subject their biofuel
policies to a full impact assessment These
assessments should cover environmental
social and economic impacts from the
regions of production to the end use
Policies which aim to reduce GHG emissions
should contain full lifecycle assessments for
individual biofuels This should ensure that
change in land use is included in the carbon
balance We propose that government
targets should be based on CO2 reductions
rather than volume as well as on availability
of feedstocks
Sustainability standards
Unilever believes sustainability criteria should
be introduced for the use of biomass within
energy programmes These should include
criteria at the production level as well as
criteria at a macro-level such as overall GHG
balance and energy effciency food security
and the protection of biodiversity and
ecosystems The use of biomass for energy
should not be stimulated by government
programmes without the application of
transparent sustainability criteria Proceeding
without these safeguards will risk unintended
consequences that could result in worse
climate change impacts natural habitat loss
and disruption of staple food supplies
Whatrsquos driving biofuels growthBiofuels have existed for over a hundred years ndash Henry Ford designed his Model T to run on bioethanol ndash but they have mostly been unable to compete with fuels derived from crude oil New government energy policies subsidies and tax exemptions are now stimulating biofuels production which has doubled since 1998 and is predicted to double again by 20115 There are a number of reasons why governments favour biofuels
Combating climate change
Transport is a signifcant contributor to
climate change accounting for around
25 of man-made greenhouse gas
emissions globally
In principle the use of biofuels can help
reduce transportrsquos impact on climate
change This is because the plants used
to make the fuels absorb carbon dioxide
(CO2) ndash the most important greenhouse
gas ndash as they grow The gas is later
released when the biofuels are used
However biofuels are not carbon neutral
It takes energy to grow and harvest the
plants and to process and distribute
biofuels The entire process emits CO2
and fertilisers emit nitrous oxide (N2O) a
powerful greenhouse gas (see graphic 4)
The amount of energy needed to make
different biofuels varies considerably This
makes it vital to take the entire production
process into account when assessing
the potential of biofuels to help reduce
transport CO2 emissions Read more about
CO2 performance overleaf
Technology and innovation
Unlike other renewable fuels such
as hydrogen the infrastructure to
manufacture and distribute biofuels is in
place today Biofuels are also compatible
with todayrsquos vehicles and power
generation technology
In 2006 $26 billion6 was invested in
biofuels The International Energy Agency
(IEA)7 estimates that between 2005 and
2030 it will cost $160 billion to expand
biofuel production to fuel 4 of global
road transport and $225 billion to fuel 7
Energy security
Global energy demands are increasing
rapidly The worldrsquos population has
doubled in the last four decades ndash to
around 66 billion in 2004 ndash and is
expected to exceed 9 billion8 by 2050
Rapid development particularly in China
and India is increasing wealth and this is
boosting demands for energy and transport
There were around 900 million vehicles
on the road in 2000 but this is forecast to
increase to over 2 billion by 20509
Fossil fuels (oil coal and gas) are
expected to be the dominant source of
energy for the foreseeable future But
production has already peaked in many
major oil-producing countries and new
developments are increasingly located in
environmentally challenging and politically
unstable parts of the world This has
resulted in high oil prices which the IEA
predicts will remain between $48ndash$62
until 203010 Some analysts predict 2030
prices could be as high as $10011 High oil
prices hit developing countries the hardest
ndash some spend six times as much on fuel as
on health12
Biofuels are seen by governments as a
secure source of energy and a way to
reduce reliance on imported fossil fuels
Brazil has replaced around 1513 of its
petrol consumption with bioethanol
according to the IEA The Washington Post puts this fgure at 4014
Rural development
Biofuels can help boost farm incomes
Globalisation and the industrialisation of
farming have reduced the price farmers
get for their produce Demand for the
agricultural commodities used to make
biofuels is reversing this trend In the
developed world this is creating jobs
and reducing the need for subsidies
for farmers
[4] biofuel co2 lifecYcle iMPAcTS
CO2
Fertilising
Harvesting Transporting
Processing
Transporting
Use
Growing
CO2
CO2 CO2
CO2
CO2
CO2
Energy
EnergyEnergy
EnergyEnergy
Energy
N2O
[2] fiRST-GeNeRATioN biofuelS bioDieSel Production process
Soybean oil
Diesel mix
Palm oil Rapeseed oil
Methyl esters
Transesterifcation
[1] fiRST-GeNeRATioN biofuelS bioeThANol Production process
Sugarcane
Sugar
Petrol mix
Corn
Starch
bioethanol
fermentation
biomass to liquid production process
Petrol mixDiesel mix
celluose ethanol production process
[3] SecoND-GeNeRATioN biofuelS
biochemical treatment
enzymatic hydrolysis
Sugar
fermentation
cellulose ethanol
Thermochemical treatmentgasifcation
Synthesis gas
Synthesis
hydrocarbons
Biomass including agricultural
residues
Special crops such as fast growing woody plants
Changes in government energy policies
are accelerating demand for liquid or
gaseous biofuels used in transport (see
facing page)
Transport biofuels can be distributed using
existing technology and used in todayrsquos
vehicles without modifcation when mixed
with petrol or diesel or in adapted vehicles
if used neat or in high concentrations
There are many different biofuels made
using a variety of production processes
and feedstocks There are two categories
First-generation biofuels made from
food crops These are widely used today
Second-generation biofuels made from
non-food crops These are in development
and will not be widely commercially
available for at least fve to ten years
First-generation biofuels
First-generation biofuels are made from
food crops including wheat rapeseed
corn soya and sugarcane
There are two main types of frst-generation
biofuels now in commercial use
Bioethanol Bioethanol is made by fermenting sugars
produced by plants (similar to beer and
wine production) Bioethanol accounts for
around 851 of global biofuel production
and is mainly produced from corn and
sugarcane
Bioethanol is usually blended with petrol ndash
todayrsquos fuel standards allow bioethanol to
be mixed with petrol in volumes up to 5
in Europe and 10 in the USA Bioethanol
can be used at higher concentrations
or neat For example in Brazil all petrol
contains at least 20ndash25 bioethanol and
many vehicles have been adapted to run
on 100 bioethanol
Bioethanol has a lower energy density
than petrol This makes it about 402 less
fuel effcient
defo
rest
atio
n la
nd-u
se ch
ange
hig
h fo
od p
rices
land
-use
cha
e h
igh
food
pric
es f
ood
shor
tage
s la
nd a
vaila
bilit
y
food
shortag
es land ava
ilability
trad
e dist
or
tions
rura
l dev
elop
men
t en
ergy
secu
rity
CO2 savi
ngs sust
ainab
ilit
y sta
ndar
ds
trad
e di
stor
tions
wat
er sh
orta
ges
biodi
versi
ty lo
ss
ener
gy s
ecur
ity C
O2
sav
ngs
sus
tain
abilit
y st
anda
rds
inno
vatio
ns
What are biofuelsBiofuels are made by processing food crops and other plants animal products or wastes (collectively known as biomass) These can be burnt to generate electricity or heat and are increasingly being used as transport fuels
PRoMoTiNG SuSTAiNAble biofuelS
Biodiesel Biodiesel is a blend of methyl esters (a type
of biofuel) and diesel Methyl esters are
produced by a chemical reaction between a
vegetable oil and an alcohol They are made
from rapeseed (primarily) palm oil and
soybean oil and account for around 153
of global biofuel production
Biodiesel is the most commonly used
biofuel in Europe where fuel standards
allow 5 blends USA fuel standards allow
blends of up to 204 Specially designed
vehicles can run on 100 biodiesel
Second-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels are made from
non-food feedstocks such as wood and
straw The production process uses the
whole plant rather than just the plant
starches or sugars that are used to make
frst-generation biofuels This means waste
materials from agricultural and forestry can
be used as feedstocks
There are a number of second-generation
biofuels under development These include
cellulose ethanol which is produced from
straw using enzymes and can be mixed
with petrol biomass-to-liquid fuel which
is made from wood feedstocks and can be
blended with diesel and biomethane a
gas made from organic material (such as
manure and straw) which can be used in
modifed petrol and diesel engines
Sources of information 1 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
2 International Energy Agency httpieaorgtextbasework2004 eswg21_NCVpdf
3 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
4 httpwwwbiodieselorgresourcesfuelfactsheetsstandards_ and_warrantiesshtm
5 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
6 United Nations Environment Programme Global Trends in Sustainable Energy Investment 2007
7 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
8 United Nations World Population to 2300 2004
9 World Business Council for Sustainable Development Energy amp Climate Change Facts and Trends to 2050 2004
10 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
11 Energy Information Administration Annual Energy Outlook 2007
12 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
13 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
14 Washington Post 200807
15 International Energy Agency Biofuels for Transport ndash An International Perspective 2004
16 Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ 2006
17 Delft Hydraulics
18 Based on Food and Agriculture Organization data available at wwwwaterfootprintorg
19 United Nations World Population to 2300 2004
20 Economist 23607
21 International Monetary Fund World Economic Report April 2007
22 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Food and Agriculture Organization Agricultural Outlook 2007-2016
23 Food and Agriculture Organization State of Food Insecurity in the World 2006
24 International Energy Agency Biofuels For Transport An International Perspective 2004
25 Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ (2006) and Delft Hydraulics
Rainforest Deforestation Impacts [7] graphic
Journal of Cleaner Production 2006 Palm Oil and the Emission of Carbon-Based Greenhouse Gases Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ
Journal of Tropical Forest Science 2005 An Assessment of Changes in Biomass Carbon Stocks in Tree Crops and Forests in Malaysia Henson IE
Oil World Annual 2007 ISTA Mielke GmbH
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Volume 2 Energy 2006
Writing and consultancy Context
Design and production Red Letter Design
Illustrations (Graphics 4 and 7) KJA-artistscom
Printing Scanplus (on paper made from responsibly managed forests)
Unilever NV Weena 455 PO Box 760 3000 DK Rotterdam The Netherlands T +31 (0)10 217 4000 F +31 (0)10 217 4798
Commercial Register Rotterdam Number 24051830
Unilever PLC PO Box 68 100 Victoria Embankment London EC4P 4BQ United Kingdom T +44 (0)20 7822 5252 F +44 (0)20 7822 5951
Unilever PLC registered offce Unilever PLC Port Sunlight Wirral Merseyside CH62 4ZD United Kingdom
Registered in England and Wales Company Number 41424
wwwunilevercom
[10] biofuelS eNeRGY DeliveRY(x 1000 litres of diesel equivalent per hectare)
Source FNR
1013 25
4054
Biomethane(energy crops)
Biomass- to-liquid
Bioethanol(wheat)
Biodiesel(rapeseed oil)
Bioethanol(sugar cane)
100
[5] co2 ReDucTioN of biofuelS coMPAReD WiTh foSSil fuelS ()
Source IEA Energy Technology Perspective 2006
Bioethanol (corn) USA
Bioethanol (wheat)
EU
Biomass to liquid(2nd generation)
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Brazil
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
EU
Fossil fuel
lt10 40-6087
100
1030
[7] RAiNfoReST DefoReSTATioN iMPAcTScarbon storage and co2 emissions per hectare in Se Asia
Sources see back page
RainforestCarbon stored above ground
230tonnescarbon
DeforestationCarbon released as CO2 due to clearing
and burning
830tonnes
CO2
Palm plantationsStores only 20 of carbon per hectare compared to rain-
forest (equivalent to 165 tonnes CO2)
48tonnescarbon
[6] biofuelS SAviNGSbiofuels cost per tonne GhG reduction ($ per tonne co2 equivalent)
Source IEA Biofuels for transportation An international perspective 2004
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Bioethanol (corn)
Bioethanol (grain)
Bioethanol (cellulose)
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
Biodiesel (biomass)
0 200 400 600 800-50
2002Post 2010
[8] PRoJecTeD GRoWTh iN fooD coNSuMPTioN
Source OECD-FAO 2006
-
-
-
-
-
-
2004 2009 2014 2019
100
110
120
130
140
150 Oil and oilseed meals
SugarMeat
CerealsDairy
1st generation biofuel 2nd generation biofuel
90
2015
2015
[9] PRoPoRTioN of cRoP uSeD foR biofuelS ()
Source The German Marshall Fund of the USA
Brazil sugarcane USA corn
EU rapeseedEU cereals
1995 1995
19951995
2005 2005
20052005
2015
2015
39
45
lt15
20
60
43
16
70
20
0
50
The unilever positionUnilever supports sustainable biofuels that deliver social and environmental benefts across their entire lifecycle
Unilever supports renewable energy
initiatives that deliver benefts on a lifecycle
basis helping to combat climate change and
reduce dependency on fossil fuels Around
17 of the energy we use for our operations
comes from renewable sources
Why the issue matters to Unilever
Two-thirds of the raw materials we use
come from agriculture These materials are
essential to our business and Unilever has
a clear interest in how they are grown and
in securing future supplies That is why
we have worked to improve the social and
environmental standards of agriculture
for more than a decade Our sustainable
agriculture programmes include palm oil
oilseed rape sunfowers spinach tomatoes
and tea We are also a member of several
sustainability initiatives including the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil
Demand for biofuels feedstock has already
reduced the availability of raw materials and
driven up prices We are concerned that
increased demand will destabilise world
food supply and undermine sustainable
agriculture Use of vegetable oils such as
rapeseed oil for biofuels could also create
shortages driving consumers to less healthy
animal fats
Lifecycle analysis
Unilever believes that individual biofuels
should be examined carefully to ensure
that the unintended environmental
(deforestation and biodiversity loss) and
socio-economic (food security) consequences
do not undermine the positive impacts
Biofuels must also be evaluated across their
lifecycle to achieve genuine greenhouse gas
(GHG) reductions
Biomass is a valuable resource Using it
to generate heat and electricity is a more
effcient and cost-effective way of reducing
CO2 emissions than using it to make
transport fuels24 New vehicle technologies
such as electric and hybrid and more
effcient engines offer signifcant scope
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
from transport
First-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that some frst-generation
biofuels are neither environmentally effcient
nor cost-effective ways to reduce emissions
Many studies have shown that several frst-
generation biofuels have poor performance
with regard to reducing GHG emissions and
dependency on fossil fuels Some even cause
more GHG emissions than the fossil fuels
they replace25
We are concerned that the use of valuable
food crops for energy purposes will increase
pressure on ecosystems and biodiversity
Deforestation particularly to make way for
palm oil and soya beans could lead to the
devastation of the last remaining rainforests
in Borneo and the Amazon region
Second-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that the development
of second-generation biofuels that donrsquot
compete with food crops and have low
carbon emissions is essential The mainstream
market introduction of second-generation
biofuels would provide a strong incentive
for the application of renewable energy
technologies while minimising the negative
repercussions on food markets and food
security Unilever believes there is a strong
case for government and business investment
in new technologies and further research on
the sustainable use of biomass Support for
second-generation biofuels could be
accelerated through
n RampD facilitation and technology transfer
n Tax exemption andor subsidies
n Phasing out support for poor performing
frst-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels should be
required to achieve at least 50 GHG
savings compared to fossil fuels
Assessing sustainability
We believe governments worldwide have
the responsibility to subject their biofuel
policies to a full impact assessment These
assessments should cover environmental
social and economic impacts from the
regions of production to the end use
Policies which aim to reduce GHG emissions
should contain full lifecycle assessments for
individual biofuels This should ensure that
change in land use is included in the carbon
balance We propose that government
targets should be based on CO2 reductions
rather than volume as well as on availability
of feedstocks
Sustainability standards
Unilever believes sustainability criteria should
be introduced for the use of biomass within
energy programmes These should include
criteria at the production level as well as
criteria at a macro-level such as overall GHG
balance and energy effciency food security
and the protection of biodiversity and
ecosystems The use of biomass for energy
should not be stimulated by government
programmes without the application of
transparent sustainability criteria Proceeding
without these safeguards will risk unintended
consequences that could result in worse
climate change impacts natural habitat loss
and disruption of staple food supplies
unintended consequencesBiofuels could help boost rural development while reducing CO2 emissions and reliance on crude oil But if biofuel strategies are not fully evaluated they could do more harm than good stimulating poor performing biofuels and stifing innovation
CO2 performance
Biofuels can help fght climate change
but CO2 savings vary signifcantly
between fuels (see graphic 5)
This is because the amount of energy needed
to produce different feedstocks (type of
crop and where it is grown) and to process
them into fuels varies considerably For
example using US corn it takes 06ndash08
litres of fossil fuels to produce an amount of
bioethanol equivalent to 1 litre of mineral
oil whereas it takes less than 01 litres of
fossil fuels to produce the same amount of
bioethanol using Brazilian sugarcane15
1500 and 4600 litres of water18 to produce
just one litre of bioethanol There are already
water shortages in many regions and population
growth and climate change will further increase
competition for clean water and increase its cost
Land-use and food availability
The worldrsquos population is rapidly
increasing and is expected to exceed
9 billion19 by 2050 To feed this
growing population will require 50 more food
in the next 20 years
While higher food prices will beneft some
producers they negatively impact the economies
of food-importing countries Poor people who
spend a large proportion of their income on
food will suffer disproportionately compared
with the wealthy Mexico has already experienced
some of the negative consequences of the
growing US bioethanol industry In 2006
Mexicans took to the streets to protest at the
high price of tortillas (a corn bread staple) made
more expensive by demand for maize from USA
bioethanol producers
In 2007 the UN World Food Programme which
fghts famine in Africa announced that it could
no longer afford to maintain its current level of
support due to high commodity prices Its food
purchasing costs rose by almost 50 between
2002 and 2007 854 million23 people suffer from
hunger and this is increasing by an average of
4 million a year at current trends Increasing
food prices will mean that even more people will
depend on food aid
Land is a fnite resource
Some biofuels are much more land
effcient than others because of
higher feedstock yields per hectare and
more effcient production processes (see graphic
10) If we are to feed a growing population using
the fnite amount of agricultural land available
it is vital that governments choose to promote
biofuels that deliver the maximum possible
energy per hectare
First-generation biofuels
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from non-tropical
feedstocks (rape wheat and corn) are not land
effcient It would require a minimum of 26 of
the worldrsquos arable land to run just 20 of its cars
on these fuels
Second-generation biofuels produce even
less CO2 as their feedstocks require fewer
agricultural inputs and production processes
are much more effcient
Biofuels cost more than petrol or diesel per
unit of energy because of the high cost of
feedstocks and production Using biodiesel
and bioethanol from crops grown in Europe
and the USA as a carbon reduction strategy
will cost around $200-$250 per tonne of
CO2 avoided at 2004 prices The cost of
bioethanol from sugarcane as in Brazil
can be comparable to that of fossil fuels
(see graphic 6) Bioethanol from cellulose
(a second-generation biofuel) could already
provide CO2 reductions at less than $200 a
tonne It is likely to remain expensive to
reduce CO2 using biodiesel and bioethanol
from US and European crops even after
2010 The cost of using second-generation
biofuels could come down to under $100 a
tonne with large-scale production
As more governments encourage the use of
biofuels and set mandatory targets demand
will outstrip supply leading to higher prices
for frst- and second-generation biofuels
Deforestation and land-use change
The demand for soya and palm oil
threatens rainforests in Brazil
Indonesia and Malaysia which
are being cleared for plantations These oils
are used by a number of industries but the
growth in biodiesel production is increasing
demand signifcantly
Rainforests store large amounts of carbon
above ground and in the soil which is
released when they are cleared (see
graphic 7) A much smaller amount of carbon
is absorbed by the plantations which replace
the forests This means biofuels grown in
tropical countries can contribute more to
climate change than fossil fuels when their
land-use impact is taken into account
Studies have shown that biodiesel made from
palm oil produces three16 to ten17 times more
CO2 than an equivalent amount of fossil
fuel The situation is even worse for biodiesel
made from soya as the crop yields less oil
and stores less carbon than palm plantations
Peat lands wetlands and grasslands also
release large amounts of carbon if converted
to agricultural use Most biodiesel is made
from rapeseed oil rather than palm oil and
soya bean oil But as an increasing share of
rapeseed oil is used for fuels rather than for
food more soya and palm is being planted
to compensate
Deforestation and land-use change means
that while biofuels can appear to help
governments meet their national greenhouse
gas emissions reduction targets they could in
reality be more damaging to climate change
globally when land-use impact is considered
This means that it is vital for national policies
to take into account the full life-cycle climate
impact of different biofuels
Biodiversity loss
The destruction of tropical forests
and grasslands to make way for
soya and palm plantations causes
signifcant destruction of plant and animal
species including endangered species such
as the orang-utan
Biofuel feedstocks are often grown as a
single crop over a wide area Known as
monoculture this brings high yields but
harms biodiversity These impacts can be
reduced to an extent through mixed planting
and leaving wild areas
Water scarcity
Both frst and second-generation
biofuels require large amounts of
water to grow and process the
feedstocks For example it takes between
In the past farmers have increased production
to meet growing demands But they are now
fnding it hard to keep up ndash in three of the four
years20 between 2003 and 2007 demand for
grains to feed people and livestock outstripped
supply As countries such as China and India
develop more people can afford meat and dairy
products This is driving up demand for agricultural
commodities The booming biofuels industry is
contributing further to this escalation in demand
First-generation biofuels compete with food
crops leading to rising food prices In future this
could jeopardise the worldrsquos ability to feed its
growing population Many other industries also
rely on raw materials like palm oil which are
being diverted to biofuel production
Increased demand higher prices
The biofuels industry is using an
increasing share of the worldrsquos food
crops (see graphic 9) which is driving
up prices Global food prices rose by 1021 in
2006 due to an increase in corn wheat and soya
bean oil prices Prices are predicted to rise by
20ndash5022 over the next decade (compared with
average levels over the last ten years)
Demand for biofuel feedstock increases prices
of other crops For example high demand for
corn to make bioethanol means US farmers are
producing less soya and wheat which is boosting
prices for those crops Biofuels are also raising
meat and dairy prices by pushing up the price of
animal feed
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from palm oil
and sugarcane are more land effcient but
there is limited potential to expand production
of the feedstocks without causing signifcant
environmental damage through loss of natural
forests and grasslands
Second-generation biofuels
To run 20 of the worldrsquos vehicles on second-
generation biofuels would require 7 of its
arable land The feedstocks for these fuels can
also be grown on other types of land such as
pastures and forests
Trade
Even at todayrsquos high oil prices most
biofuels cannot compete on cost with
petrol and diesel Biofuel producers
rely on government subsidies for their profts
Governments are beginning to set mandatory
targets to stimulate investment and demand
for biofuels This is further boosting the price
of agricultural commodities and contributing to
trade distortions
In Brazil a well-established biofuel industry and
low production costs means Brazilian bioethanol
is cost competitive with petrol and diesel The
EU and the USA have set trade barriers to
protect domestic biofuel industries from cheap
Brazilian bioethanol imports This is encouraging
the development of less cost-effective and less
sustainable biofuels This makes it more diffcult
for those developing countries that are better
suited to biofuels production to compete on
world markets
Many governments have proposed mandatory
biofuel targets that exceed their countryrsquos
production and land capacity In future this
could make these countries dependent on
foreign imports which will undermine their
energy security Commodity prices will continue
to rise as competition increases for limited
global supplies
[11] GlobAl iMPAcTS AND uNiNTeNDeD coNSeQueNceS
USA TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2030 30 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
11800000 tonnes
USA accounts for 15 of global biodiesel production
EU TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
730000 tonnes
Europe accounts for 85 of global biodiesel production
China TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 15 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
800000 tonnes
China has imposed a moratorium on projects making bioethanol fuel from corn and other basic food crops
USA corn wheat and soybean
Reduction in US land Bioethanol production used for food crops has pushed up corn pushes production prices sparking elsewhere potentially protests in Mexico causing deforestation
Europe doesnrsquot have enough land to meet its biofuels targets Europe rapeseed oil and wheatand will be dependent on imports
The worldrsquos poorest are already being affected by higher food prices
Brazil sugarcane and soybean
KEY
Issues with food security
Issues with GHGs
Issues with sustainability
Issues with trade
Feedstocks
Areas of tropical rainforest
Trade
Unintended consequences
Sustainability criteria
The social and environmental impacts
of biofuels vary considerably
depending on the type of feedstock
used where it is grown and the processes
needed to turn it into biofuels
Sustainability criteria are required to provide
confdence in the labelling and identifcation
of specifc types of biofuel The criteria should
Brazil TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2010 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
12900000 tonnes
cover the lifecycle CO2 emissions and impacts
on natural habitats as well as socio-economic
factors such as the availability of food for the
local population where feedstocks are produced
In 2007 the Dutch Government announced
sustainability criteria and has proposed a system
to enable traceability of feedstocks by 2020
The UK Government has proposed that 80 of
biofuels meet sustainability standards including
European demand for biodiesel feedstock
98 of Indonesiarsquos raises palm oil price natural rainforest will causing deforestation be degraded or gone by 2022
India TARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 20 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
240000 tonnes
Sources FOLicht UN
CO2 reduction requirements by 2010ndash11 The
EU is developing sustainability criteria
Business is also developing sustainability
standards through initiatives such as the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (chaired by
Unilever) and the Roundtable on Sustainable
Biofuels The latter aims to launch draft
sustainability standards in early 2008
Sources FOLicht UN
[10] biofuelS eNeRGY DeliveRY(x 1000 litres of diesel equivalent per hectare)
Source FNR
1013 25
4054
Biomethane(energy crops)
Biomass- to-liquid
Bioethanol(wheat)
Biodiesel(rapeseed oil)
Bioethanol(sugar cane)
Sustainability criteria
The social and environmental impacts
of biofuels vary considerably
depending on the type of feedstock
used where it is grown and the processes
needed to turn it into biofuels
Sustainability criteria are required to provide
confdence in the labelling and identifcation
of specifc types of biofuel The criteria should
100
[5] co2 ReDucTioN of biofuelS coMPAReD WiTh foSSil fuelS ()
Source IEA Energy Technology Perspective 2006
Bioethanol (corn) USA
Bioethanol (wheat)
EU
Biomass to liquid(2nd generation)
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Brazil
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
EU
Fossil fuel
lt10 40-6087
100
1030
[7] RAiNfoReST DefoReSTATioN iMPAcTScarbon storage and co2 emissions per hectare in Se Asia
Sources see back page
RainforestCarbon stored above ground
230tonnescarbon
DeforestationCarbon released as CO2 due to clearing
and burning
830tonnes
CO2
Palm plantationsStores only 20 of carbon per hectare compared to rain-
forest (equivalent to 165 tonnes CO2)
48tonnescarbon
[6] biofuelS SAviNGSbiofuels cost per tonne GhG reduction ($ per tonne co2 equivalent)
Source IEA Biofuels for transportation An international perspective 2004
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Bioethanol (corn)
Bioethanol (grain)
Bioethanol (cellulose)
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
Biodiesel (biomass)
0 200 400 600 800-50
2002Post 2010
[8] PRoJecTeD GRoWTh iN fooD coNSuMPTioN
Source OECD-FAO 2006
-
-
-
-
-
-
2004 2009 2014 2019
100
110
120
130
140
150 Oil and oilseed meals
SugarMeat
CerealsDairy
1st generation biofuel 2nd generation biofuel
cover the lifecycle CO2 emissions and impacts
on natural habitats as well as socio-economic
factors such as the availability of food for the
local population where feedstocks are produced
In 2007 the Dutch Government announced
sustainability criteria and has proposed a system
to enable traceability of feedstocks by 2020
The UK Government has proposed that 80 of
biofuels meet sustainability standards including
CO2 reduction requirements by 2010ndash11 The
EU is developing sustainability criteria
Business is also developing sustainability
standards through initiatives such as the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (chaired by
Unilever) and the Roundtable on Sustainable
Biofuels The latter aims to launch draft
sustainability standards in early 2008
90
2015
2015
[9] PRoPoRTioN of cRoP uSeD foR biofuelS ()
Source The German Marshall Fund of the USA
Brazil sugarcane USA corn
EU rapeseedEU cereals
1995 1995
19951995
2005 2005
20052005
2015
2015
39
45
lt15
20
60
43
16
70
20
0
50USATARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2030 30 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
11800000 tonnes
USA accounts for 15 of global biodiesel production
ChinaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 15 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
800000 tonnes
China has imposed a moratorium on projects making bioethanol fuel from corn and other basic food crops
BrazilTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2010 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
12900000 tonnes
IndiaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 20 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
240000 tonnes
EUTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
730000 tonnes
Europe accounts for 85 of global biodiesel production
Reduction in US land used for food crops pushes production elsewhere potentially causing deforestation
Brazil sugarcane and soybean
European demand for biodiesel feedstock raises palm oil price causing deforestation
Europe doesnrsquot have enough land to meet its biofuels targets and will be dependent on imports
USA corn wheat and soybean
Bioethanol production has pushed up corn prices sparking protests in Mexico
The worldrsquos poorest are already being affected by higher food prices
98 of Indonesiarsquos natural rainforest will be degraded or gone by 2022
KEY
Issues with food security
Issues with GHGs
Issues with sustainability
Issues with trade
Areas of tropical rainforest
Trade
Unintended consequences
Feedstocks
Europe rapeseed oil and wheat
unintended consequencesBiofuels could help boost rural development while reducing CO2 emissions and reliance on crude oil But if biofuel strategies are not fully evaluated they could do more harm than good stimulating poor performing biofuels and stifing innovation
CO2 performance
Biofuels can help fght climate change
but CO2 savings vary signifcantly
between fuels (see graphic 5)
This is because the amount of energy needed
to produce different feedstocks (type of
crop and where it is grown) and to process
them into fuels varies considerably For
example using US corn it takes 06ndash08
litres of fossil fuels to produce an amount of
bioethanol equivalent to 1 litre of mineral
oil whereas it takes less than 01 litres of
fossil fuels to produce the same amount of
bioethanol using Brazilian sugarcane15
1500 and 4600 litres of water18 to produce
just one litre of bioethanol There are already
water shortages in many regions and population
growth and climate change will further increase
competition for clean water and increase its cost
Land-use and food availability
The worldrsquos population is rapidly
increasing and is expected to exceed
9 billion19 by 2050 To feed this
growing population will require 50 more food
in the next 20 years
While higher food prices will beneft some
producers they negatively impact the economies
of food-importing countries Poor people who
spend a large proportion of their income on
food will suffer disproportionately compared
with the wealthy Mexico has already experienced
some of the negative consequences of the
growing US bioethanol industry In 2006
Mexicans took to the streets to protest at the
high price of tortillas (a corn bread staple) made
more expensive by demand for maize from USA
bioethanol producers
In 2007 the UN World Food Programme which
fghts famine in Africa announced that it could
no longer afford to maintain its current level of
support due to high commodity prices Its food
purchasing costs rose by almost 50 between
2002 and 2007 854 million23 people suffer from
hunger and this is increasing by an average of
4 million a year at current trends Increasing
food prices will mean that even more people will
depend on food aid
Land is a fnite resource
Some biofuels are much more land
effcient than others because of
higher feedstock yields per hectare and
more effcient production processes (see graphic
10) If we are to feed a growing population using
the fnite amount of agricultural land available
it is vital that governments choose to promote
biofuels that deliver the maximum possible
energy per hectare
First-generation biofuels
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from non-tropical
feedstocks (rape wheat and corn) are not land
effcient It would require a minimum of 26 of
the worldrsquos arable land to run just 20 of its cars
on these fuels
[11] GlobAl iMPAcTS AND uNiNTeNDeD coNSeQueNceS
Second-generation biofuels produce even
less CO2 as their feedstocks require fewer
agricultural inputs and production processes
are much more effcient
Biofuels cost more than petrol or diesel per
unit of energy because of the high cost of
feedstocks and production Using biodiesel
and bioethanol from crops grown in Europe
and the USA as a carbon reduction strategy
will cost around $200-$250 per tonne of
CO2 avoided at 2004 prices The cost of
bioethanol from sugarcane as in Brazil
can be comparable to that of fossil fuels
(see graphic 6) Bioethanol from cellulose
(a second-generation biofuel) could already
provide CO2 reductions at less than $200 a
tonne It is likely to remain expensive to
reduce CO2 using biodiesel and bioethanol
from US and European crops even after
2010 The cost of using second-generation
biofuels could come down to under $100 a
tonne with large-scale production
As more governments encourage the use of
biofuels and set mandatory targets demand
will outstrip supply leading to higher prices
for frst- and second-generation biofuels
Deforestation and land-use change
The demand for soya and palm oil
threatens rainforests in Brazil
Indonesia and Malaysia which
are being cleared for plantations These oils
are used by a number of industries but the
growth in biodiesel production is increasing
demand signifcantly
Rainforests store large amounts of carbon
above ground and in the soil which is
released when they are cleared (see
graphic 7) A much smaller amount of carbon
is absorbed by the plantations which replace
the forests This means biofuels grown in
tropical countries can contribute more to
climate change than fossil fuels when their
land-use impact is taken into account
Studies have shown that biodiesel made from
palm oil produces three16 to ten17 times more
CO2 than an equivalent amount of fossil
fuel The situation is even worse for biodiesel
made from soya as the crop yields less oil
and stores less carbon than palm plantations
Peat lands wetlands and grasslands also
release large amounts of carbon if converted
to agricultural use Most biodiesel is made
from rapeseed oil rather than palm oil and
soya bean oil But as an increasing share of
rapeseed oil is used for fuels rather than for
food more soya and palm is being planted
to compensate
Deforestation and land-use change means
that while biofuels can appear to help
governments meet their national greenhouse
gas emissions reduction targets they could in
reality be more damaging to climate change
globally when land-use impact is considered
This means that it is vital for national policies
to take into account the full life-cycle climate
impact of different biofuels
Biodiversity loss
The destruction of tropical forests
and grasslands to make way for
soya and palm plantations causes
signifcant destruction of plant and animal
species including endangered species such
as the orang-utan
Biofuel feedstocks are often grown as a
single crop over a wide area Known as
monoculture this brings high yields but
harms biodiversity These impacts can be
reduced to an extent through mixed planting
and leaving wild areas
Water scarcity
Both frst and second-generation
biofuels require large amounts of
water to grow and process the
feedstocks For example it takes between
In the past farmers have increased production
to meet growing demands But they are now
fnding it hard to keep up ndash in three of the four
years20 between 2003 and 2007 demand for
grains to feed people and livestock outstripped
supply As countries such as China and India
develop more people can afford meat and dairy
products This is driving up demand for agricultural
commodities The booming biofuels industry is
contributing further to this escalation in demand
First-generation biofuels compete with food
crops leading to rising food prices In future this
could jeopardise the worldrsquos ability to feed its
growing population Many other industries also
rely on raw materials like palm oil which are
being diverted to biofuel production
Increased demand higher prices
The biofuels industry is using an
increasing share of the worldrsquos food
crops (see graphic 9) which is driving
up prices Global food prices rose by 1021 in
2006 due to an increase in corn wheat and soya
bean oil prices Prices are predicted to rise by
20ndash5022 over the next decade (compared with
average levels over the last ten years)
Demand for biofuel feedstock increases prices
of other crops For example high demand for
corn to make bioethanol means US farmers are
producing less soya and wheat which is boosting
prices for those crops Biofuels are also raising
meat and dairy prices by pushing up the price of
animal feed
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from palm oil
and sugarcane are more land effcient but
there is limited potential to expand production
of the feedstocks without causing signifcant
environmental damage through loss of natural
forests and grasslands
Second-generation biofuels
To run 20 of the worldrsquos vehicles on second-
generation biofuels would require 7 of its
arable land The feedstocks for these fuels can
also be grown on other types of land such as
pastures and forests
Trade
Even at todayrsquos high oil prices most
biofuels cannot compete on cost with
petrol and diesel Biofuel producers
rely on government subsidies for their profts
Governments are beginning to set mandatory
targets to stimulate investment and demand
for biofuels This is further boosting the price
of agricultural commodities and contributing to
trade distortions
In Brazil a well-established biofuel industry and
low production costs means Brazilian bioethanol
is cost competitive with petrol and diesel The
EU and the USA have set trade barriers to
protect domestic biofuel industries from cheap
Brazilian bioethanol imports This is encouraging
the development of less cost-effective and less
sustainable biofuels This makes it more diffcult
for those developing countries that are better
suited to biofuels production to compete on
world markets
Many governments have proposed mandatory
biofuel targets that exceed their countryrsquos
production and land capacity In future this
could make these countries dependent on
foreign imports which will undermine their
energy security Commodity prices will continue
to rise as competition increases for limited
global supplies
The unilever position Unilever supports sustainable biofuels that deliver social and environmental benefts across their entire lifecycle
Unilever supports renewable energy
initiatives that deliver benefts on a lifecycle
basis helping to combat climate change and
reduce dependency on fossil fuels Around
17 of the energy we use for our operations
comes from renewable sources
Why the issue matters to Unilever
Two-thirds of the raw materials we use
come from agriculture These materials are
essential to our business and Unilever has
a clear interest in how they are grown and
in securing future supplies That is why
we have worked to improve the social and
environmental standards of agriculture
for more than a decade Our sustainable
agriculture programmes include palm oil
oilseed rape sunfowers spinach tomatoes
and tea We are also a member of several
sustainability initiatives including the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil
Demand for biofuels feedstock has already
reduced the availability of raw materials and
driven up prices We are concerned that
increased demand will destabilise world
food supply and undermine sustainable
agriculture Use of vegetable oils such as
rapeseed oil for biofuels could also create
shortages driving consumers to less healthy
animal fats
Lifecycle analysis
Unilever believes that individual biofuels
should be examined carefully to ensure
that the unintended environmental
(deforestation and biodiversity loss) and
socio-economic (food security) consequences
do not undermine the positive impacts
Biofuels must also be evaluated across their
lifecycle to achieve genuine greenhouse gas
(GHG) reductions
Biomass is a valuable resource Using it
to generate heat and electricity is a more
effcient and cost-effective way of reducing
CO2 emissions than using it to make
transport fuels24 New vehicle technologies
such as electric and hybrid and more
effcient engines offer signifcant scope
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
from transport
First-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that some frst-generation
biofuels are neither environmentally effcient
nor cost-effective ways to reduce emissions
Many studies have shown that several frst-
generation biofuels have poor performance
with regard to reducing GHG emissions and
dependency on fossil fuels Some even cause
more GHG emissions than the fossil fuels
they replace25
We are concerned that the use of valuable
food crops for energy purposes will increase
pressure on ecosystems and biodiversity
Deforestation particularly to make way for
palm oil and soya beans could lead to the
devastation of the last remaining rainforests
in Borneo and the Amazon region
Second-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that the development
of second-generation biofuels that donrsquot
compete with food crops and have low
carbon emissions is essential The mainstream
market introduction of second-generation
biofuels would provide a strong incentive
for the application of renewable energy
technologies while minimising the negative
repercussions on food markets and food
security Unilever believes there is a strong
case for government and business investment
in new technologies and further research on
the sustainable use of biomass Support for
second-generation biofuels could be
accelerated through
n RampD facilitation and technology transfer
n Tax exemption andor subsidies
n Phasing out support for poor performing
frst-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels should be
required to achieve at least 50 GHG
savings compared to fossil fuels
Assessing sustainability
We believe governments worldwide have
the responsibility to subject their biofuel
policies to a full impact assessment These
assessments should cover environmental
social and economic impacts from the
regions of production to the end use
Policies which aim to reduce GHG emissions
should contain full lifecycle assessments for
individual biofuels This should ensure that
change in land use is included in the carbon
balance We propose that government
targets should be based on CO2 reductions
rather than volume as well as on availability
of feedstocks
Sustainability standards
Unilever believes sustainability criteria should
be introduced for the use of biomass within
energy programmes These should include
criteria at the production level as well as
criteria at a macro-level such as overall GHG
balance and energy effciency food security
and the protection of biodiversity and
ecosystems The use of biomass for energy
should not be stimulated by government
programmes without the application of
transparent sustainability criteria Proceeding
without these safeguards will risk unintended
consequences that could result in worse
climate change impacts natural habitat loss
and disruption of staple food supplies
Whatrsquos driving biofuels growthBiofuels have existed for over a hundred years ndash Henry Ford designed his Model T to run on bioethanol ndash but they have mostly been unable to compete with fuels derived from crude oil New government energy policies subsidies and tax exemptions are now stimulating biofuels production which has doubled since 1998 and is predicted to double again by 20115 There are a number of reasons why governments favour biofuels
Combating climate change
Transport is a signifcant contributor to
climate change accounting for around
25 of man-made greenhouse gas
emissions globally
In principle the use of biofuels can help
reduce transportrsquos impact on climate
change This is because the plants used
to make the fuels absorb carbon dioxide
(CO2) ndash the most important greenhouse
gas ndash as they grow The gas is later
released when the biofuels are used
However biofuels are not carbon neutral
It takes energy to grow and harvest the
plants and to process and distribute
biofuels The entire process emits CO2
and fertilisers emit nitrous oxide (N2O) a
powerful greenhouse gas (see graphic 4)
The amount of energy needed to make
different biofuels varies considerably This
makes it vital to take the entire production
process into account when assessing
the potential of biofuels to help reduce
transport CO2 emissions Read more about
CO2 performance overleaf
Technology and innovation
Unlike other renewable fuels such
as hydrogen the infrastructure to
manufacture and distribute biofuels is in
place today Biofuels are also compatible
with todayrsquos vehicles and power
generation technology
In 2006 $26 billion6 was invested in
biofuels The International Energy Agency
(IEA)7 estimates that between 2005 and
2030 it will cost $160 billion to expand
biofuel production to fuel 4 of global
road transport and $225 billion to fuel 7
Energy security
Global energy demands are increasing
rapidly The worldrsquos population has
doubled in the last four decades ndash to
around 66 billion in 2004 ndash and is
expected to exceed 9 billion8 by 2050
Rapid development particularly in China
and India is increasing wealth and this is
boosting demands for energy and transport
There were around 900 million vehicles
on the road in 2000 but this is forecast to
increase to over 2 billion by 20509
Fossil fuels (oil coal and gas) are
expected to be the dominant source of
energy for the foreseeable future But
production has already peaked in many
major oil-producing countries and new
developments are increasingly located in
environmentally challenging and politically
unstable parts of the world This has
resulted in high oil prices which the IEA
predicts will remain between $48ndash$62
until 203010 Some analysts predict 2030
prices could be as high as $10011 High oil
prices hit developing countries the hardest
ndash some spend six times as much on fuel as
on health12
Biofuels are seen by governments as a
secure source of energy and a way to
reduce reliance on imported fossil fuels
Brazil has replaced around 1513 of its
petrol consumption with bioethanol
according to the IEA The Washington Post puts this fgure at 4014
Rural development
Biofuels can help boost farm incomes
Globalisation and the industrialisation of
farming have reduced the price farmers
get for their produce Demand for the
agricultural commodities used to make
biofuels is reversing this trend In the
developed world this is creating jobs
and reducing the need for subsidies
for farmers
[4] biofuel co2 lifecYcle iMPAcTS
CO2
Fertilising
Harvesting Transporting
Processing
Transporting
Use
Growing
CO2
CO2 CO2
CO2
CO2
CO2
Energy
EnergyEnergy
EnergyEnergy
Energy
N2O
[2] fiRST-GeNeRATioN biofuelS bioDieSel Production process
Soybean oil
Diesel mix
Palm oil Rapeseed oil
Methyl esters
Transesterifcation
[1] fiRST-GeNeRATioN biofuelS bioeThANol Production process
Sugarcane
Sugar
Petrol mix
Corn
Starch
bioethanol
fermentation
biomass to liquid production process
Petrol mixDiesel mix
celluose ethanol production process
[3] SecoND-GeNeRATioN biofuelS
biochemical treatment
enzymatic hydrolysis
Sugar
fermentation
cellulose ethanol
Thermochemical treatmentgasifcation
Synthesis gas
Synthesis
hydrocarbons
Biomass including agricultural
residues
Special crops such as fast growing woody plants
Changes in government energy policies
are accelerating demand for liquid or
gaseous biofuels used in transport (see
facing page)
Transport biofuels can be distributed using
existing technology and used in todayrsquos
vehicles without modifcation when mixed
with petrol or diesel or in adapted vehicles
if used neat or in high concentrations
There are many different biofuels made
using a variety of production processes
and feedstocks There are two categories
First-generation biofuels made from
food crops These are widely used today
Second-generation biofuels made from
non-food crops These are in development
and will not be widely commercially
available for at least fve to ten years
First-generation biofuels
First-generation biofuels are made from
food crops including wheat rapeseed
corn soya and sugarcane
There are two main types of frst-generation
biofuels now in commercial use
Bioethanol Bioethanol is made by fermenting sugars
produced by plants (similar to beer and
wine production) Bioethanol accounts for
around 851 of global biofuel production
and is mainly produced from corn and
sugarcane
Bioethanol is usually blended with petrol ndash
todayrsquos fuel standards allow bioethanol to
be mixed with petrol in volumes up to 5
in Europe and 10 in the USA Bioethanol
can be used at higher concentrations
or neat For example in Brazil all petrol
contains at least 20ndash25 bioethanol and
many vehicles have been adapted to run
on 100 bioethanol
Bioethanol has a lower energy density
than petrol This makes it about 402 less
fuel effcient
defo
rest
atio
n la
nd-u
se ch
ange
hig
h fo
od p
rices
land
-use
cha
e h
igh
food
pric
es f
ood
shor
tage
s la
nd a
vaila
bilit
y
food
shortag
es land ava
ilability
trad
e dist
or
tions
rura
l dev
elop
men
t en
ergy
secu
rity
CO2 savi
ngs sust
ainab
ilit
y sta
ndar
ds
trad
e di
stor
tions
wat
er sh
orta
ges
biodi
versi
ty lo
ss
ener
gy s
ecur
ity C
O2
sav
ngs
sus
tain
abilit
y st
anda
rds
inno
vatio
ns
What are biofuelsBiofuels are made by processing food crops and other plants animal products or wastes (collectively known as biomass) These can be burnt to generate electricity or heat and are increasingly being used as transport fuels
PRoMoTiNG SuSTAiNAble biofuelS
Biodiesel Biodiesel is a blend of methyl esters (a type
of biofuel) and diesel Methyl esters are
produced by a chemical reaction between a
vegetable oil and an alcohol They are made
from rapeseed (primarily) palm oil and
soybean oil and account for around 153
of global biofuel production
Biodiesel is the most commonly used
biofuel in Europe where fuel standards
allow 5 blends USA fuel standards allow
blends of up to 204 Specially designed
vehicles can run on 100 biodiesel
Second-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels are made from
non-food feedstocks such as wood and
straw The production process uses the
whole plant rather than just the plant
starches or sugars that are used to make
frst-generation biofuels This means waste
materials from agricultural and forestry can
be used as feedstocks
There are a number of second-generation
biofuels under development These include
cellulose ethanol which is produced from
straw using enzymes and can be mixed
with petrol biomass-to-liquid fuel which
is made from wood feedstocks and can be
blended with diesel and biomethane a
gas made from organic material (such as
manure and straw) which can be used in
modifed petrol and diesel engines
Sources of information 1 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
2 International Energy Agency httpieaorgtextbasework2004 eswg21_NCVpdf
3 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
4 httpwwwbiodieselorgresourcesfuelfactsheetsstandards_ and_warrantiesshtm
5 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
6 United Nations Environment Programme Global Trends in Sustainable Energy Investment 2007
7 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
8 United Nations World Population to 2300 2004
9 World Business Council for Sustainable Development Energy amp Climate Change Facts and Trends to 2050 2004
10 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
11 Energy Information Administration Annual Energy Outlook 2007
12 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
13 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
14 Washington Post 200807
15 International Energy Agency Biofuels for Transport ndash An International Perspective 2004
16 Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ 2006
17 Delft Hydraulics
18 Based on Food and Agriculture Organization data available at wwwwaterfootprintorg
19 United Nations World Population to 2300 2004
20 Economist 23607
21 International Monetary Fund World Economic Report April 2007
22 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Food and Agriculture Organization Agricultural Outlook 2007-2016
23 Food and Agriculture Organization State of Food Insecurity in the World 2006
24 International Energy Agency Biofuels For Transport An International Perspective 2004
25 Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ (2006) and Delft Hydraulics
Rainforest Deforestation Impacts [7] graphic
Journal of Cleaner Production 2006 Palm Oil and the Emission of Carbon-Based Greenhouse Gases Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ
Journal of Tropical Forest Science 2005 An Assessment of Changes in Biomass Carbon Stocks in Tree Crops and Forests in Malaysia Henson IE
Oil World Annual 2007 ISTA Mielke GmbH
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Volume 2 Energy 2006
Writing and consultancy Context
Design and production Red Letter Design
Illustrations (Graphics 4 and 7) KJA-artistscom
Printing Scanplus (on paper made from responsibly managed forests)
Unilever NV Weena 455 PO Box 760 3000 DK Rotterdam The Netherlands T +31 (0)10 217 4000 F +31 (0)10 217 4798
Commercial Register Rotterdam Number 24051830
Unilever PLC PO Box 68 100 Victoria Embankment London EC4P 4BQ United Kingdom T +44 (0)20 7822 5252 F +44 (0)20 7822 5951
Unilever PLC registered offce Unilever PLC Port Sunlight Wirral Merseyside CH62 4ZD United Kingdom
Registered in England and Wales Company Number 41424
wwwunilevercom
Sources FOLicht UN
[10] biofuelS eNeRGY DeliveRY(x 1000 litres of diesel equivalent per hectare)
Source FNR
1013 25
4054
Biomethane(energy crops)
Biomass- to-liquid
Bioethanol(wheat)
Biodiesel(rapeseed oil)
Bioethanol(sugar cane)
Sustainability criteria
The social and environmental impacts
of biofuels vary considerably
depending on the type of feedstock
used where it is grown and the processes
needed to turn it into biofuels
Sustainability criteria are required to provide
confdence in the labelling and identifcation
of specifc types of biofuel The criteria should
100
[5] co2 ReDucTioN of biofuelS coMPAReD WiTh foSSil fuelS ()
Source IEA Energy Technology Perspective 2006
Bioethanol (corn) USA
Bioethanol (wheat)
EU
Biomass to liquid(2nd generation)
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Brazil
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
EU
Fossil fuel
lt10 40-6087
100
1030
[7] RAiNfoReST DefoReSTATioN iMPAcTScarbon storage and co2 emissions per hectare in Se Asia
Sources see back page
RainforestCarbon stored above ground
230tonnescarbon
DeforestationCarbon released as CO2 due to clearing
and burning
830tonnes
CO2
Palm plantationsStores only 20 of carbon per hectare compared to rain-
forest (equivalent to 165 tonnes CO2)
48tonnescarbon
[6] biofuelS SAviNGSbiofuels cost per tonne GhG reduction ($ per tonne co2 equivalent)
Source IEA Biofuels for transportation An international perspective 2004
Bioethanol (sugarcane)
Bioethanol (corn)
Bioethanol (grain)
Bioethanol (cellulose)
Biodiesel (rapeseed)
Biodiesel (biomass)
0 200 400 600 800-50
2002Post 2010
[8] PRoJecTeD GRoWTh iN fooD coNSuMPTioN
Source OECD-FAO 2006
-
-
-
-
-
-
2004 2009 2014 2019
100
110
120
130
140
150 Oil and oilseed meals
SugarMeat
CerealsDairy
1st generation biofuel 2nd generation biofuel
cover the lifecycle CO2 emissions and impacts
on natural habitats as well as socio-economic
factors such as the availability of food for the
local population where feedstocks are produced
In 2007 the Dutch Government announced
sustainability criteria and has proposed a system
to enable traceability of feedstocks by 2020
The UK Government has proposed that 80 of
biofuels meet sustainability standards including
CO2 reduction requirements by 2010ndash11 The
EU is developing sustainability criteria
Business is also developing sustainability
standards through initiatives such as the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (chaired by
Unilever) and the Roundtable on Sustainable
Biofuels The latter aims to launch draft
sustainability standards in early 2008
90
2015
2015
[9] PRoPoRTioN of cRoP uSeD foR biofuelS ()
Source The German Marshall Fund of the USA
Brazil sugarcane USA corn
EU rapeseedEU cereals
1995 1995
19951995
2005 2005
20052005
2015
2015
39
45
lt15
20
60
43
16
70
20
0
50USATARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2030 30 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
11800000 tonnes
USA accounts for 15 of global biodiesel production
ChinaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 15 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
800000 tonnes
China has imposed a moratorium on projects making bioethanol fuel from corn and other basic food crops
BrazilTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2010 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
12900000 tonnes
IndiaTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 20 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
240000 tonnes
EUTARGET Biofuel as of transport fuel
2020 10 BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION (2005)
730000 tonnes
Europe accounts for 85 of global biodiesel production
Reduction in US land used for food crops pushes production elsewhere potentially causing deforestation
Brazil sugarcane and soybean
European demand for biodiesel feedstock raises palm oil price causing deforestation
Europe doesnrsquot have enough land to meet its biofuels targets and will be dependent on imports
USA corn wheat and soybean
Bioethanol production has pushed up corn prices sparking protests in Mexico
The worldrsquos poorest are already being affected by higher food prices
98 of Indonesiarsquos natural rainforest will be degraded or gone by 2022
KEY
Issues with food security
Issues with GHGs
Issues with sustainability
Issues with trade
Areas of tropical rainforest
Trade
Unintended consequences
Feedstocks
Europe rapeseed oil and wheat
unintended consequencesBiofuels could help boost rural development while reducing CO2 emissions and reliance on crude oil But if biofuel strategies are not fully evaluated they could do more harm than good stimulating poor performing biofuels and stifing innovation
CO2 performance
Biofuels can help fght climate change
but CO2 savings vary signifcantly
between fuels (see graphic 5)
This is because the amount of energy needed
to produce different feedstocks (type of
crop and where it is grown) and to process
them into fuels varies considerably For
example using US corn it takes 06ndash08
litres of fossil fuels to produce an amount of
bioethanol equivalent to 1 litre of mineral
oil whereas it takes less than 01 litres of
fossil fuels to produce the same amount of
bioethanol using Brazilian sugarcane15
1500 and 4600 litres of water18 to produce
just one litre of bioethanol There are already
water shortages in many regions and population
growth and climate change will further increase
competition for clean water and increase its cost
Land-use and food availability
The worldrsquos population is rapidly
increasing and is expected to exceed
9 billion19 by 2050 To feed this
growing population will require 50 more food
in the next 20 years
While higher food prices will beneft some
producers they negatively impact the economies
of food-importing countries Poor people who
spend a large proportion of their income on
food will suffer disproportionately compared
with the wealthy Mexico has already experienced
some of the negative consequences of the
growing US bioethanol industry In 2006
Mexicans took to the streets to protest at the
high price of tortillas (a corn bread staple) made
more expensive by demand for maize from USA
bioethanol producers
In 2007 the UN World Food Programme which
fghts famine in Africa announced that it could
no longer afford to maintain its current level of
support due to high commodity prices Its food
purchasing costs rose by almost 50 between
2002 and 2007 854 million23 people suffer from
hunger and this is increasing by an average of
4 million a year at current trends Increasing
food prices will mean that even more people will
depend on food aid
Land is a fnite resource
Some biofuels are much more land
effcient than others because of
higher feedstock yields per hectare and
more effcient production processes (see graphic
10) If we are to feed a growing population using
the fnite amount of agricultural land available
it is vital that governments choose to promote
biofuels that deliver the maximum possible
energy per hectare
First-generation biofuels
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from non-tropical
feedstocks (rape wheat and corn) are not land
effcient It would require a minimum of 26 of
the worldrsquos arable land to run just 20 of its cars
on these fuels
[11] GlobAl iMPAcTS AND uNiNTeNDeD coNSeQueNceS
Second-generation biofuels produce even
less CO2 as their feedstocks require fewer
agricultural inputs and production processes
are much more effcient
Biofuels cost more than petrol or diesel per
unit of energy because of the high cost of
feedstocks and production Using biodiesel
and bioethanol from crops grown in Europe
and the USA as a carbon reduction strategy
will cost around $200-$250 per tonne of
CO2 avoided at 2004 prices The cost of
bioethanol from sugarcane as in Brazil
can be comparable to that of fossil fuels
(see graphic 6) Bioethanol from cellulose
(a second-generation biofuel) could already
provide CO2 reductions at less than $200 a
tonne It is likely to remain expensive to
reduce CO2 using biodiesel and bioethanol
from US and European crops even after
2010 The cost of using second-generation
biofuels could come down to under $100 a
tonne with large-scale production
As more governments encourage the use of
biofuels and set mandatory targets demand
will outstrip supply leading to higher prices
for frst- and second-generation biofuels
Deforestation and land-use change
The demand for soya and palm oil
threatens rainforests in Brazil
Indonesia and Malaysia which
are being cleared for plantations These oils
are used by a number of industries but the
growth in biodiesel production is increasing
demand signifcantly
Rainforests store large amounts of carbon
above ground and in the soil which is
released when they are cleared (see
graphic 7) A much smaller amount of carbon
is absorbed by the plantations which replace
the forests This means biofuels grown in
tropical countries can contribute more to
climate change than fossil fuels when their
land-use impact is taken into account
Studies have shown that biodiesel made from
palm oil produces three16 to ten17 times more
CO2 than an equivalent amount of fossil
fuel The situation is even worse for biodiesel
made from soya as the crop yields less oil
and stores less carbon than palm plantations
Peat lands wetlands and grasslands also
release large amounts of carbon if converted
to agricultural use Most biodiesel is made
from rapeseed oil rather than palm oil and
soya bean oil But as an increasing share of
rapeseed oil is used for fuels rather than for
food more soya and palm is being planted
to compensate
Deforestation and land-use change means
that while biofuels can appear to help
governments meet their national greenhouse
gas emissions reduction targets they could in
reality be more damaging to climate change
globally when land-use impact is considered
This means that it is vital for national policies
to take into account the full life-cycle climate
impact of different biofuels
Biodiversity loss
The destruction of tropical forests
and grasslands to make way for
soya and palm plantations causes
signifcant destruction of plant and animal
species including endangered species such
as the orang-utan
Biofuel feedstocks are often grown as a
single crop over a wide area Known as
monoculture this brings high yields but
harms biodiversity These impacts can be
reduced to an extent through mixed planting
and leaving wild areas
Water scarcity
Both frst and second-generation
biofuels require large amounts of
water to grow and process the
feedstocks For example it takes between
In the past farmers have increased production
to meet growing demands But they are now
fnding it hard to keep up ndash in three of the four
years20 between 2003 and 2007 demand for
grains to feed people and livestock outstripped
supply As countries such as China and India
develop more people can afford meat and dairy
products This is driving up demand for agricultural
commodities The booming biofuels industry is
contributing further to this escalation in demand
First-generation biofuels compete with food
crops leading to rising food prices In future this
could jeopardise the worldrsquos ability to feed its
growing population Many other industries also
rely on raw materials like palm oil which are
being diverted to biofuel production
Increased demand higher prices
The biofuels industry is using an
increasing share of the worldrsquos food
crops (see graphic 9) which is driving
up prices Global food prices rose by 1021 in
2006 due to an increase in corn wheat and soya
bean oil prices Prices are predicted to rise by
20ndash5022 over the next decade (compared with
average levels over the last ten years)
Demand for biofuel feedstock increases prices
of other crops For example high demand for
corn to make bioethanol means US farmers are
producing less soya and wheat which is boosting
prices for those crops Biofuels are also raising
meat and dairy prices by pushing up the price of
animal feed
Bioethanol and biodiesel made from palm oil
and sugarcane are more land effcient but
there is limited potential to expand production
of the feedstocks without causing signifcant
environmental damage through loss of natural
forests and grasslands
Second-generation biofuels
To run 20 of the worldrsquos vehicles on second-
generation biofuels would require 7 of its
arable land The feedstocks for these fuels can
also be grown on other types of land such as
pastures and forests
Trade
Even at todayrsquos high oil prices most
biofuels cannot compete on cost with
petrol and diesel Biofuel producers
rely on government subsidies for their profts
Governments are beginning to set mandatory
targets to stimulate investment and demand
for biofuels This is further boosting the price
of agricultural commodities and contributing to
trade distortions
In Brazil a well-established biofuel industry and
low production costs means Brazilian bioethanol
is cost competitive with petrol and diesel The
EU and the USA have set trade barriers to
protect domestic biofuel industries from cheap
Brazilian bioethanol imports This is encouraging
the development of less cost-effective and less
sustainable biofuels This makes it more diffcult
for those developing countries that are better
suited to biofuels production to compete on
world markets
Many governments have proposed mandatory
biofuel targets that exceed their countryrsquos
production and land capacity In future this
could make these countries dependent on
foreign imports which will undermine their
energy security Commodity prices will continue
to rise as competition increases for limited
global supplies
The unilever position Unilever supports sustainable biofuels that deliver social and environmental benefts across their entire lifecycle
Unilever supports renewable energy
initiatives that deliver benefts on a lifecycle
basis helping to combat climate change and
reduce dependency on fossil fuels Around
17 of the energy we use for our operations
comes from renewable sources
Why the issue matters to Unilever
Two-thirds of the raw materials we use
come from agriculture These materials are
essential to our business and Unilever has
a clear interest in how they are grown and
in securing future supplies That is why
we have worked to improve the social and
environmental standards of agriculture
for more than a decade Our sustainable
agriculture programmes include palm oil
oilseed rape sunfowers spinach tomatoes
and tea We are also a member of several
sustainability initiatives including the
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil
Demand for biofuels feedstock has already
reduced the availability of raw materials and
driven up prices We are concerned that
increased demand will destabilise world
food supply and undermine sustainable
agriculture Use of vegetable oils such as
rapeseed oil for biofuels could also create
shortages driving consumers to less healthy
animal fats
Lifecycle analysis
Unilever believes that individual biofuels
should be examined carefully to ensure
that the unintended environmental
(deforestation and biodiversity loss) and
socio-economic (food security) consequences
do not undermine the positive impacts
Biofuels must also be evaluated across their
lifecycle to achieve genuine greenhouse gas
(GHG) reductions
Biomass is a valuable resource Using it
to generate heat and electricity is a more
effcient and cost-effective way of reducing
CO2 emissions than using it to make
transport fuels24 New vehicle technologies
such as electric and hybrid and more
effcient engines offer signifcant scope
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
from transport
First-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that some frst-generation
biofuels are neither environmentally effcient
nor cost-effective ways to reduce emissions
Many studies have shown that several frst-
generation biofuels have poor performance
with regard to reducing GHG emissions and
dependency on fossil fuels Some even cause
more GHG emissions than the fossil fuels
they replace25
We are concerned that the use of valuable
food crops for energy purposes will increase
pressure on ecosystems and biodiversity
Deforestation particularly to make way for
palm oil and soya beans could lead to the
devastation of the last remaining rainforests
in Borneo and the Amazon region
Second-generation biofuels
Unilever believes that the development
of second-generation biofuels that donrsquot
compete with food crops and have low
carbon emissions is essential The mainstream
market introduction of second-generation
biofuels would provide a strong incentive
for the application of renewable energy
technologies while minimising the negative
repercussions on food markets and food
security Unilever believes there is a strong
case for government and business investment
in new technologies and further research on
the sustainable use of biomass Support for
second-generation biofuels could be
accelerated through
n RampD facilitation and technology transfer
n Tax exemption andor subsidies
n Phasing out support for poor performing
frst-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels should be
required to achieve at least 50 GHG
savings compared to fossil fuels
Assessing sustainability
We believe governments worldwide have
the responsibility to subject their biofuel
policies to a full impact assessment These
assessments should cover environmental
social and economic impacts from the
regions of production to the end use
Policies which aim to reduce GHG emissions
should contain full lifecycle assessments for
individual biofuels This should ensure that
change in land use is included in the carbon
balance We propose that government
targets should be based on CO2 reductions
rather than volume as well as on availability
of feedstocks
Sustainability standards
Unilever believes sustainability criteria should
be introduced for the use of biomass within
energy programmes These should include
criteria at the production level as well as
criteria at a macro-level such as overall GHG
balance and energy effciency food security
and the protection of biodiversity and
ecosystems The use of biomass for energy
should not be stimulated by government
programmes without the application of
transparent sustainability criteria Proceeding
without these safeguards will risk unintended
consequences that could result in worse
climate change impacts natural habitat loss
and disruption of staple food supplies
Whatrsquos driving biofuels growthBiofuels have existed for over a hundred years ndash Henry Ford designed his Model T to run on bioethanol ndash but they have mostly been unable to compete with fuels derived from crude oil New government energy policies subsidies and tax exemptions are now stimulating biofuels production which has doubled since 1998 and is predicted to double again by 20115 There are a number of reasons why governments favour biofuels
Combating climate change
Transport is a signifcant contributor to
climate change accounting for around
25 of man-made greenhouse gas
emissions globally
In principle the use of biofuels can help
reduce transportrsquos impact on climate
change This is because the plants used
to make the fuels absorb carbon dioxide
(CO2) ndash the most important greenhouse
gas ndash as they grow The gas is later
released when the biofuels are used
However biofuels are not carbon neutral
It takes energy to grow and harvest the
plants and to process and distribute
biofuels The entire process emits CO2
and fertilisers emit nitrous oxide (N2O) a
powerful greenhouse gas (see graphic 4)
The amount of energy needed to make
different biofuels varies considerably This
makes it vital to take the entire production
process into account when assessing
the potential of biofuels to help reduce
transport CO2 emissions Read more about
CO2 performance overleaf
Technology and innovation
Unlike other renewable fuels such
as hydrogen the infrastructure to
manufacture and distribute biofuels is in
place today Biofuels are also compatible
with todayrsquos vehicles and power
generation technology
In 2006 $26 billion6 was invested in
biofuels The International Energy Agency
(IEA)7 estimates that between 2005 and
2030 it will cost $160 billion to expand
biofuel production to fuel 4 of global
road transport and $225 billion to fuel 7
Energy security
Global energy demands are increasing
rapidly The worldrsquos population has
doubled in the last four decades ndash to
around 66 billion in 2004 ndash and is
expected to exceed 9 billion8 by 2050
Rapid development particularly in China
and India is increasing wealth and this is
boosting demands for energy and transport
There were around 900 million vehicles
on the road in 2000 but this is forecast to
increase to over 2 billion by 20509
Fossil fuels (oil coal and gas) are
expected to be the dominant source of
energy for the foreseeable future But
production has already peaked in many
major oil-producing countries and new
developments are increasingly located in
environmentally challenging and politically
unstable parts of the world This has
resulted in high oil prices which the IEA
predicts will remain between $48ndash$62
until 203010 Some analysts predict 2030
prices could be as high as $10011 High oil
prices hit developing countries the hardest
ndash some spend six times as much on fuel as
on health12
Biofuels are seen by governments as a
secure source of energy and a way to
reduce reliance on imported fossil fuels
Brazil has replaced around 1513 of its
petrol consumption with bioethanol
according to the IEA The Washington Post puts this fgure at 4014
Rural development
Biofuels can help boost farm incomes
Globalisation and the industrialisation of
farming have reduced the price farmers
get for their produce Demand for the
agricultural commodities used to make
biofuels is reversing this trend In the
developed world this is creating jobs
and reducing the need for subsidies
for farmers
[4] biofuel co2 lifecYcle iMPAcTS
CO2
Fertilising
Harvesting Transporting
Processing
Transporting
Use
Growing
CO2
CO2 CO2
CO2
CO2
CO2
Energy
EnergyEnergy
EnergyEnergy
Energy
N2O
[2] fiRST-GeNeRATioN biofuelS bioDieSel Production process
Soybean oil
Diesel mix
Palm oil Rapeseed oil
Methyl esters
Transesterifcation
[1] fiRST-GeNeRATioN biofuelS bioeThANol Production process
Sugarcane
Sugar
Petrol mix
Corn
Starch
bioethanol
fermentation
biomass to liquid production process
Petrol mixDiesel mix
celluose ethanol production process
[3] SecoND-GeNeRATioN biofuelS
biochemical treatment
enzymatic hydrolysis
Sugar
fermentation
cellulose ethanol
Thermochemical treatmentgasifcation
Synthesis gas
Synthesis
hydrocarbons
Biomass including agricultural
residues
Special crops such as fast growing woody plants
Changes in government energy policies
are accelerating demand for liquid or
gaseous biofuels used in transport (see
facing page)
Transport biofuels can be distributed using
existing technology and used in todayrsquos
vehicles without modifcation when mixed
with petrol or diesel or in adapted vehicles
if used neat or in high concentrations
There are many different biofuels made
using a variety of production processes
and feedstocks There are two categories
First-generation biofuels made from
food crops These are widely used today
Second-generation biofuels made from
non-food crops These are in development
and will not be widely commercially
available for at least fve to ten years
First-generation biofuels
First-generation biofuels are made from
food crops including wheat rapeseed
corn soya and sugarcane
There are two main types of frst-generation
biofuels now in commercial use
Bioethanol Bioethanol is made by fermenting sugars
produced by plants (similar to beer and
wine production) Bioethanol accounts for
around 851 of global biofuel production
and is mainly produced from corn and
sugarcane
Bioethanol is usually blended with petrol ndash
todayrsquos fuel standards allow bioethanol to
be mixed with petrol in volumes up to 5
in Europe and 10 in the USA Bioethanol
can be used at higher concentrations
or neat For example in Brazil all petrol
contains at least 20ndash25 bioethanol and
many vehicles have been adapted to run
on 100 bioethanol
Bioethanol has a lower energy density
than petrol This makes it about 402 less
fuel effcient
defo
rest
atio
n la
nd-u
se ch
ange
hig
h fo
od p
rices
land
-use
cha
e h
igh
food
pric
es f
ood
shor
tage
s la
nd a
vaila
bilit
y
food
shortag
es land ava
ilability
trad
e dist
or
tions
rura
l dev
elop
men
t en
ergy
secu
rity
CO2 savi
ngs sust
ainab
ilit
y sta
ndar
ds
trad
e di
stor
tions
wat
er sh
orta
ges
biodi
versi
ty lo
ss
ener
gy s
ecur
ity C
O2
sav
ngs
sus
tain
abilit
y st
anda
rds
inno
vatio
ns
What are biofuelsBiofuels are made by processing food crops and other plants animal products or wastes (collectively known as biomass) These can be burnt to generate electricity or heat and are increasingly being used as transport fuels
PRoMoTiNG SuSTAiNAble biofuelS
Biodiesel Biodiesel is a blend of methyl esters (a type
of biofuel) and diesel Methyl esters are
produced by a chemical reaction between a
vegetable oil and an alcohol They are made
from rapeseed (primarily) palm oil and
soybean oil and account for around 153
of global biofuel production
Biodiesel is the most commonly used
biofuel in Europe where fuel standards
allow 5 blends USA fuel standards allow
blends of up to 204 Specially designed
vehicles can run on 100 biodiesel
Second-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels are made from
non-food feedstocks such as wood and
straw The production process uses the
whole plant rather than just the plant
starches or sugars that are used to make
frst-generation biofuels This means waste
materials from agricultural and forestry can
be used as feedstocks
There are a number of second-generation
biofuels under development These include
cellulose ethanol which is produced from
straw using enzymes and can be mixed
with petrol biomass-to-liquid fuel which
is made from wood feedstocks and can be
blended with diesel and biomethane a
gas made from organic material (such as
manure and straw) which can be used in
modifed petrol and diesel engines
Sources of information 1 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
2 International Energy Agency httpieaorgtextbasework2004 eswg21_NCVpdf
3 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
4 httpwwwbiodieselorgresourcesfuelfactsheetsstandards_ and_warrantiesshtm
5 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
6 United Nations Environment Programme Global Trends in Sustainable Energy Investment 2007
7 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
8 United Nations World Population to 2300 2004
9 World Business Council for Sustainable Development Energy amp Climate Change Facts and Trends to 2050 2004
10 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
11 Energy Information Administration Annual Energy Outlook 2007
12 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
13 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
14 Washington Post 200807
15 International Energy Agency Biofuels for Transport ndash An International Perspective 2004
16 Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ 2006
17 Delft Hydraulics
18 Based on Food and Agriculture Organization data available at wwwwaterfootprintorg
19 United Nations World Population to 2300 2004
20 Economist 23607
21 International Monetary Fund World Economic Report April 2007
22 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Food and Agriculture Organization Agricultural Outlook 2007-2016
23 Food and Agriculture Organization State of Food Insecurity in the World 2006
24 International Energy Agency Biofuels For Transport An International Perspective 2004
25 Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ (2006) and Delft Hydraulics
Rainforest Deforestation Impacts [7] graphic
Journal of Cleaner Production 2006 Palm Oil and the Emission of Carbon-Based Greenhouse Gases Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ
Journal of Tropical Forest Science 2005 An Assessment of Changes in Biomass Carbon Stocks in Tree Crops and Forests in Malaysia Henson IE
Oil World Annual 2007 ISTA Mielke GmbH
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Volume 2 Energy 2006
Writing and consultancy Context
Design and production Red Letter Design
Illustrations (Graphics 4 and 7) KJA-artistscom
Printing Scanplus (on paper made from responsibly managed forests)
Unilever NV Weena 455 PO Box 760 3000 DK Rotterdam The Netherlands T +31 (0)10 217 4000 F +31 (0)10 217 4798
Commercial Register Rotterdam Number 24051830
Unilever PLC PO Box 68 100 Victoria Embankment London EC4P 4BQ United Kingdom T +44 (0)20 7822 5252 F +44 (0)20 7822 5951
Unilever PLC registered offce Unilever PLC Port Sunlight Wirral Merseyside CH62 4ZD United Kingdom
Registered in England and Wales Company Number 41424
wwwunilevercom
Whatrsquos driving biofuels growthBiofuels have existed for over a hundred years ndash Henry Ford designed his Model T to run on bioethanol ndash but they have mostly been unable to compete with fuels derived from crude oil New government energy policies subsidies and tax exemptions are now stimulating biofuels production which has doubled since 1998 and is predicted to double again by 20115 There are a number of reasons why governments favour biofuels
Combating climate change
Transport is a signifcant contributor to
climate change accounting for around
25 of man-made greenhouse gas
emissions globally
In principle the use of biofuels can help
reduce transportrsquos impact on climate
change This is because the plants used
to make the fuels absorb carbon dioxide
(CO2) ndash the most important greenhouse
gas ndash as they grow The gas is later
released when the biofuels are used
However biofuels are not carbon neutral
It takes energy to grow and harvest the
plants and to process and distribute
biofuels The entire process emits CO2
and fertilisers emit nitrous oxide (N2O) a
powerful greenhouse gas (see graphic 4)
The amount of energy needed to make
different biofuels varies considerably This
makes it vital to take the entire production
process into account when assessing
the potential of biofuels to help reduce
transport CO2 emissions Read more about
CO2 performance overleaf
Technology and innovation
Unlike other renewable fuels such
as hydrogen the infrastructure to
manufacture and distribute biofuels is in
place today Biofuels are also compatible
with todayrsquos vehicles and power
generation technology
In 2006 $26 billion6 was invested in
biofuels The International Energy Agency
(IEA)7 estimates that between 2005 and
2030 it will cost $160 billion to expand
biofuel production to fuel 4 of global
road transport and $225 billion to fuel 7
Energy security
Global energy demands are increasing
rapidly The worldrsquos population has
doubled in the last four decades ndash to
around 66 billion in 2004 ndash and is
expected to exceed 9 billion8 by 2050
Rapid development particularly in China
and India is increasing wealth and this is
boosting demands for energy and transport
There were around 900 million vehicles
on the road in 2000 but this is forecast to
increase to over 2 billion by 20509
Fossil fuels (oil coal and gas) are
expected to be the dominant source of
energy for the foreseeable future But
production has already peaked in many
major oil-producing countries and new
developments are increasingly located in
environmentally challenging and politically
unstable parts of the world This has
resulted in high oil prices which the IEA
predicts will remain between $48ndash$62
until 203010 Some analysts predict 2030
prices could be as high as $10011 High oil
prices hit developing countries the hardest
ndash some spend six times as much on fuel as
on health12
Biofuels are seen by governments as a
secure source of energy and a way to
reduce reliance on imported fossil fuels
Brazil has replaced around 1513 of its
petrol consumption with bioethanol
according to the IEA The Washington Post puts this fgure at 4014
Rural development
Biofuels can help boost farm incomes
Globalisation and the industrialisation of
farming have reduced the price farmers
get for their produce Demand for the
agricultural commodities used to make
biofuels is reversing this trend In the
developed world this is creating jobs
and reducing the need for subsidies
for farmers
[4] biofuel co2 lifecYcle iMPAcTS
CO2
Fertilising
Harvesting Transporting
Processing
Transporting
Use
Growing
CO2
CO2 CO2
CO2
CO2
CO2
Energy
EnergyEnergy
EnergyEnergy
Energy
N2O
[2] fiRST-GeNeRATioN biofuelS bioDieSel Production process
Soybean oil
Diesel mix
Palm oil Rapeseed oil
Methyl esters
Transesterifcation
[1] fiRST-GeNeRATioN biofuelS bioeThANol Production process
Sugarcane
Sugar
Petrol mix
Corn
Starch
bioethanol
fermentation
biomass to liquid production process
Petrol mixDiesel mix
celluose ethanol production process
[3] SecoND-GeNeRATioN biofuelS
biochemical treatment
enzymatic hydrolysis
Sugar
fermentation
cellulose ethanol
Thermochemical treatmentgasifcation
Synthesis gas
Synthesis
hydrocarbons
Biomass including agricultural
residues
Special crops such as fast growing woody plants
Changes in government energy policies
are accelerating demand for liquid or
gaseous biofuels used in transport (see
facing page)
Transport biofuels can be distributed using
existing technology and used in todayrsquos
vehicles without modifcation when mixed
with petrol or diesel or in adapted vehicles
if used neat or in high concentrations
There are many different biofuels made
using a variety of production processes
and feedstocks There are two categories
First-generation biofuels made from
food crops These are widely used today
Second-generation biofuels made from
non-food crops These are in development
and will not be widely commercially
available for at least fve to ten years
First-generation biofuels
First-generation biofuels are made from
food crops including wheat rapeseed
corn soya and sugarcane
There are two main types of frst-generation
biofuels now in commercial use
Bioethanol Bioethanol is made by fermenting sugars
produced by plants (similar to beer and
wine production) Bioethanol accounts for
around 851 of global biofuel production
and is mainly produced from corn and
sugarcane
Bioethanol is usually blended with petrol ndash
todayrsquos fuel standards allow bioethanol to
be mixed with petrol in volumes up to 5
in Europe and 10 in the USA Bioethanol
can be used at higher concentrations
or neat For example in Brazil all petrol
contains at least 20ndash25 bioethanol and
many vehicles have been adapted to run
on 100 bioethanol
Bioethanol has a lower energy density
than petrol This makes it about 402 less
fuel effcient
defo
rest
atio
n la
nd-u
se ch
ange
hig
h fo
od p
rices
land
-use
cha
e h
igh
food
pric
es f
ood
shor
tage
s la
nd a
vaila
bilit
y
food
shortag
es land ava
ilability
trad
e dist
or
tions
rura
l dev
elop
men
t en
ergy
secu
rity
CO2 savi
ngs sust
ainab
ilit
y sta
ndar
ds
trad
e di
stor
tions
wat
er sh
orta
ges
biodi
versi
ty lo
ss
ener
gy s
ecur
ity C
O2
sav
ngs
sus
tain
abilit
y st
anda
rds
inno
vatio
ns
What are biofuelsBiofuels are made by processing food crops and other plants animal products or wastes (collectively known as biomass) These can be burnt to generate electricity or heat and are increasingly being used as transport fuels
PRoMoTiNG SuSTAiNAble biofuelS
Biodiesel Biodiesel is a blend of methyl esters (a type
of biofuel) and diesel Methyl esters are
produced by a chemical reaction between a
vegetable oil and an alcohol They are made
from rapeseed (primarily) palm oil and
soybean oil and account for around 153
of global biofuel production
Biodiesel is the most commonly used
biofuel in Europe where fuel standards
allow 5 blends USA fuel standards allow
blends of up to 204 Specially designed
vehicles can run on 100 biodiesel
Second-generation biofuels
Second-generation biofuels are made from
non-food feedstocks such as wood and
straw The production process uses the
whole plant rather than just the plant
starches or sugars that are used to make
frst-generation biofuels This means waste
materials from agricultural and forestry can
be used as feedstocks
There are a number of second-generation
biofuels under development These include
cellulose ethanol which is produced from
straw using enzymes and can be mixed
with petrol biomass-to-liquid fuel which
is made from wood feedstocks and can be
blended with diesel and biomethane a
gas made from organic material (such as
manure and straw) which can be used in
modifed petrol and diesel engines
Sources of information 1 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
2 International Energy Agency httpieaorgtextbasework2004 eswg21_NCVpdf
3 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
4 httpwwwbiodieselorgresourcesfuelfactsheetsstandards_ and_warrantiesshtm
5 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
6 United Nations Environment Programme Global Trends in Sustainable Energy Investment 2007
7 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
8 United Nations World Population to 2300 2004
9 World Business Council for Sustainable Development Energy amp Climate Change Facts and Trends to 2050 2004
10 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
11 Energy Information Administration Annual Energy Outlook 2007
12 United Nations Sustainable Bioenergy A Framework for Decision Makers 2007
13 International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2006
14 Washington Post 200807
15 International Energy Agency Biofuels for Transport ndash An International Perspective 2004
16 Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ 2006
17 Delft Hydraulics
18 Based on Food and Agriculture Organization data available at wwwwaterfootprintorg
19 United Nations World Population to 2300 2004
20 Economist 23607
21 International Monetary Fund World Economic Report April 2007
22 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Food and Agriculture Organization Agricultural Outlook 2007-2016
23 Food and Agriculture Organization State of Food Insecurity in the World 2006
24 International Energy Agency Biofuels For Transport An International Perspective 2004
25 Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ (2006) and Delft Hydraulics
Rainforest Deforestation Impacts [7] graphic
Journal of Cleaner Production 2006 Palm Oil and the Emission of Carbon-Based Greenhouse Gases Reijinders L amp Huijbrechts MAJ
Journal of Tropical Forest Science 2005 An Assessment of Changes in Biomass Carbon Stocks in Tree Crops and Forests in Malaysia Henson IE
Oil World Annual 2007 ISTA Mielke GmbH
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Volume 2 Energy 2006
Writing and consultancy Context
Design and production Red Letter Design
Illustrations (Graphics 4 and 7) KJA-artistscom
Printing Scanplus (on paper made from responsibly managed forests)
Unilever NV Weena 455 PO Box 760 3000 DK Rotterdam The Netherlands T +31 (0)10 217 4000 F +31 (0)10 217 4798
Commercial Register Rotterdam Number 24051830
Unilever PLC PO Box 68 100 Victoria Embankment London EC4P 4BQ United Kingdom T +44 (0)20 7822 5252 F +44 (0)20 7822 5951
Unilever PLC registered offce Unilever PLC Port Sunlight Wirral Merseyside CH62 4ZD United Kingdom
Registered in England and Wales Company Number 41424
wwwunilevercom