what performance do you really need

8/3/2019 What Performance Do You Really Need

1/28

What Performance Do You Really Need.doc Page 1 of 28

www.ACIServicesInc.com Phone: (740) 435-0240 Fax: (740) 435-0260

125 Steubenville Ave. Cambridge, Ohio 43725

Specifying Required Performance when Purchasing Reciprocating Compressors

Purchasing a new compressor can be an involved and expensive process. Therefore, it is prudent that

companies require a full array of compressor performance from bidding compressor packagers/OEMs.Otherwise, buyers may end up with equipment that may not be useable over the full operating maps for

which the customers expect to operate.

OEMs and packagers have been delivering simple point performance to end-users for more than half acentury. While these are important reports to receive and review, there are additional types of

compressor performance reports available today. Not only do these new reports give further insight into

compressor operations and safety, but they also allow end-users to quickly review the compressorsabilities across entire envelopes of operating ranges, instead of just a handful of limited operating points.

A full performance review of a packagers proposed solution to a purchasers compression needs willhelp identify where the unit is truly useful, and where the proposed unit may have potential operating

limitations. Unfortunately, the standard deliverable of just a few printouts of performance at the

specified design points, along with a few printouts of select performance curves, may not always

identify potentially serious operating issues with reciprocating compressors. In general, as a unitsoperating map expands, it becomes even more important to fully review that units performance across

its entire operating map all pressures, all temperatures, all speeds, variations in gas being compressed,

and all load steps.

To meet the needs of end-users and to help clarify to packagers and OEMs what compressor

performance end-users really need, a useful check list for identifying various types of performance hasbeen co developed. This concise list is detailed on the following page. End-users can simply specify

which items are required and which items are highly recommended in any bid proposals. Items of nointerest are easily deleted from the list.

During the biding process, required/suggested items should be based on modeling of the proposed

unit(s), albeit with allowances for certain yet-to-be-determined parameters, such as more accurate

pressure drops via acoustic pulsation modeling. However, after the unit is purchased, all items shouldreflect the final compression system as delivered to the end-user.

Finally, the remaining sections of this document detail explicit types of compressor performance end-users should require/request from their packagers/OEMs when specifying new equipment, along with

justifications for why those types of performance are required, and what type of responses the end-user

might consider if a bidding packager/OEM cannot provide the required performance. Finally, eachsection contains a sample report, plot, curve, or data table of format similar to what the buyer should be

specifying.

Note: The various sections in this document are written so as to be independent of other items. Thus an

end-user can extract just the items desired and create a list of performance required by their company.

Electronic versions of this document in MS Word format can be downloaded from either

www.CompressorTech2.com or www.ACIServicesInc.com.


2/28




Check List for Required Compressor Performance for New Units

Point Performance Runs

o All Guarantee and Design Points OEM Compressor Modeling File

Full Unit Informationo Detailed unit diagram, geometries, unloading device types/volumes, weights, etc.

Expected Pressure Drops

Safe Startup Maps

Maps Where Rod Load Issues Existo Include all pressure combinations, all load steps and full range of speeds

Maps Where Pin Non-reversal Issues Existo Include all pressure combinations, all load steps and full range of speeds

Highest Expected Discharge Temperature Mapso Include all pressure combinations, all load steps and full range of speedso Include associated Flow Rates

Highest Expected Discharge Pressure Mapso Include all pressure combinations, all load steps and full range of speeds

Sidestream Review

Unit Robustness Map

Performance Curveso Sets must include varying speed, when appropriateo Suction vs. Load, and Suction vs. Flow Curves:o Discharge vs. Load, and Discharge vs. Flow Curves:

Flow Maps

Unit (and/or System) Isentropic Efficiency Maps

Compression Ratio Maps

Load Step Curvature Review

Acoustic Review across Entire Operating Map


3/28




Point Performance Runs for All Guarantee Points and All Design Points

Point Performance Runs Required Item

Item(s) Point Performance runs for all Guarantee Points and all Design Points.

Reason(s) Used as part of warranty for the unit being considered; used to verify that unit is correctlysized to meet specified flow rates at the specified guarantee and design points.

Response If data is not provided, then buyer should seriously consider an alternate

packager/OEM.

In general, point performance reports are always supplied. Usually there are from one (1) to five (5)guarantee points, and anywhere from one (1) to thirty (30) design points.


4/28




Compressors Modeling File

Compressor Modeling File Required Item

Item(s) File of compressor model used in OEM software of unit, such as an eAjax file, an Ariel

RUN file, a Superior Cascade or Compass file, a DR-Size file, a KWPerformance file, or a

GE EZ Size Pro file.

Reason(s) Used for identifying compressor performance after unit is brought online. Used to identify

units hardware configuration. Used by end-user and third parties to create models of unitfor automation purposes, in-house modeling, for use in reservoir models, etc.

Response If file is not provided, then buyer should consider an alternate packager/OEM.

Each of the major compressor OEMs has their own performance software for modeling their line of

compressors. Thus, when a new unit is ordered, specify that the electronic file used for the model is to

also be delivered.

OEM Software Files

Ajax (Cameron Compression Systems) eAjax *.eaj

Ariel Ariel Performance Software *.run

Dresser-Rand DRSize *.inp

Gemini (GE Energy) EZSize Pro *.ezs

Knox Western KW-Performance Software *.kps

Superior (Cameron Compression Systems) Cascade *.cas

Superior (Cameron Compression Systems) Compass *.ccs

Compressor performance software is used to predict loads, flow rates, andareas where high discharge temperatures, high interstage pressures, rodloads, pin non-lubrication, low volumetric efficiencies, and other issues,

such as formation of liquids, may occur. These predictions are based ontheoretical modeling, which should be reasonably close to measured data.

Therefore, somewhere in the OEM software, there should be a section of

text detailing within what tolerance levels the OEM predictions typically

compare with measured data, and also specifications for when thosetolerance levels actually apply.

Note: Attenuation devices, piping changes,

cooler changes, different gas analyses, etc. all

can impact system pressure drops and gas

pulsations. These in turn affect measured loads

and flows. Therefore, those items need to be

compensated in the compressor model if you

expect predicted loads and flows to be consistent

with measured data.

Theoretical P-V Card Actual P-V Card


5/28




Full Unit Information

Complete Unit Geometry Required Item

Item(s) Driver ratings, compressor frame stroke, frame and cylinder ratings, weights and limits

used for rod load and pin reversal calculations, cylinder bore and rod diameters, connecting

rod length, cylinder volumetric clearances (base clearances per end, actual clearances withunloading devices per end, volumes of all volume bottles), and valve information for each

type of valve.

Reason(s) Necessary information if additional load/flow devices are to be added later to the unit or if

new types of valves are later used. Required information to create automation routines to

effectively and safely control the unit.

Response If data is not provided, then buyer should consider an alternate packager/OEM.

A full unit information report should include a layout of the unit as sold and installed. Furthermore,there should be clear listings of:

Driver information and rating, Frame rating, Length of connecting rods, Cylinder bore sizes, Individual cylinder staging, Initial, fixed volumetric base clearances for

each end (i.e. clearances that do not reflect

added fixed volumes from valves and/orunloading devices),

Actual base clearances used (i.e. clearancesthat do reflect added fixed volumes from valvesand/or unloading devices),

Description of how tandem cylinders are setup, Cylinder pressure ratings, Piston and Tail Rod diameters, Clear limits used for rod loads (gas and/or inertia), Clear limits for pin non-reversals, Weights used per throw for net rod load determination, Weights per throw used for pin reversal determinations, Clear temperature limits per cylinder, Clear low volumetric efficiency limits, Valve information:

o Quantity,o Size (i.e. nominal diameters),o Effectiveness (flow areas, lift areas, resistance factors, etc.).

While much of this information may be found in the supplied OEM modeling file, some of it may not be

clearly identifiable to the end-user often items that involve weights and valves are obfuscated and thus

are difficult to find in some of the OEM software.


6/28




Sample

Unit

Arrangement

Diagrams

Access to the correct unit information is critical to others who may need to accurately model units. Themost common reasons for modeling a unit are:

Unit Automation, Converting OEM models for use with in-house and/or third-party software, such as:

o Performance: eRCM, HTS, RCS Excalibur, RecipWin/Recipak-PC, etc.o Fleet Monitoring Software: Enalysis, HPMax, RECON, MAO, and others.o Piping Software: Stoner, WinFlow, etc.

If a new unit cannot be properly modeled in other software used by the end-user, then the ability to fully

utilize that unit may suffer. Or even worse, the unit may be allowed to operate at unsafe conditions.


7/28




Expected Pressure Drops

Stage Pressure Drops Required Item

Item(s) Expected system pressure drops (bottles, filters, separators, piping, etc.) into and out of

each stage. As a minimum, these need to be specified as fixed drops and/or percent drops.

Ideally, pressure drops are given as a function of expected flow rates. When a detailedacoustic study is performed, better estimates of pressure drops due to inclusion of

attenuation devices are determined.

Reason(s) Used to better model unit performance, and hence improve accuracy of load and flow

predictions. Also, can affect rod load and pin reversal calculations and hence the models

ability to keep the unit safe.

Response If pressure drops are not provided, then buyer can work with their own analysts to

measure some actual pressure drops through the system.

In general, whenever an acoustic study is performed, pressure drops are determined throughout the

system. For compressor performance in particular, the collective pressure drops between where the inletpressure is sensed and the inlet cylinder flange, and from the cylinder discharge flange to the where the

final discharge pressure is sensed are the pressure drops required.

Ideally, these pressure drops will be given as a function of flow rates. However, for simplicity, most

packagers/OEMs model their units based on pressure drops given as fixed pressure drops, or as a percent

of stage inlet and outlet pressures (absolute).

A table of these pressure drops per stage (into and out of that stage) should be given to the end user.

Furthermore, a diagram should be provided that details between what locations the estimated pressured

drops apply.

Note: Often, the use of orifice plates, especially on high-speed units that single-act, can contribute to

significant pressure drops (especially dynamic pressure drops). In some cases, such as low compression

ratios, use of orifice plates can affect unit performance by as much as 30%! This is important

information to know prior to ordering a driver and/or getting emission permits.

Supplied performance curves, in-house models, third-party models, and monitoring software should all

reflect the appropriate pressure drops estimated via the pulsation study after appropriate attenuationdevices have been selected and modeled.

Stage-1 Pressure Drops (sample):

Load Step

Speed

(rpm)

Suction

Pressure @

Sensor

(psiA)

Suction

Pressure @

Flange

(psiA)

Discharge

Pressure @

Flange

(psiA)

Discharge

Pressure @

Sensor

(psiA)

Flow

Rate

(MMscfd)

1 1000 145 140 361 345 380.9

12 950 195 191 539 520 260.8


8/28




Safe Startup Maps

Safe Startup Maps Required Item

Item(s) Safe Startup Maps

Reason(s) Identifies when the unit can be brought online at minimum speed, least-load load step, andpressures experienced when closing the recycle valve. If the least-load load step cannot

always be used, then the map needs to identify which load step must be selected prior to

closing the recycle valve to safely start the unit. At times, the unit may only be safelystarted by first reducing the suction pressure so as to prevent rod loads and/or pin non-

reversals.

Response If the packager/OEM cannot specify under what pressure and speed conditions it is

safe to start the unit, then consider an alternate packager/OEM. Or, make sure their

warranty covers all startup operating conditions.

It is important to know when a unit can be safely started. During the startup process, the inertia effect

from the lower speed combined with the gas pressures experienced when closing the bypass valve tobegin the compression event may lead to rod load, and/or pin non-reversal issues on certain load steps.

Occasionally, the load step affected may be the least-load load step (i.e. all pockets open, all applicable

ends deactivated). Most automated units are usually started in their least-load load step. This cansometimes create a serious problem.

Therefore, it may be necessary to change to a different load step, or even decrease the suction pressure

to an acceptable pressure prior to starting the unit.

In the above example, suction pressure should be decreased to less than 29 psig. Furthermore, where the

least-load load step (#25) is not indicated (yellow regions in the table), the units hardware configuration

should be set to the required load step (number in the cell) prior to closing the bypass valve.


9/28




Rod Load and Pin Reversal Maps

Full Rod Load Review Required Item

Item(s) Review of where rod load issues exist for each load step, across all pressure combinations,

and all speeds. Rod load reports should be based on using identical or similar methods used

by OEM for unit warranty.

Reason(s) Identifies where unit can experience rod load issues. These change (often very quickly)

with varying pressures, speeds and load steps, and even suction temperatures. Very oftenoverlooked leaving end-users stuck with a unit that has a very limited operating map.

Response If the packager/OEM cannot identify for what combinations of pressure and speed

and load steps the unit will experience rod load issues, then either consider another

packager/OEM or have these determined by in-house or third-party software.

Full Pin Non-reversal Review Required ItemItem(s) Review of where pin non-reversal issues exist for each load step, across all pressure

combinations, and all speeds.

Reason(s) Identifies where unit can experience pin non-reversal issues. These change (often very

quickly) with varying pressures, speeds and load steps, and even suction temperatures.

Very often overlooked leaving end-users stuck with a unit that has a very limited operating

map.

Response If the packager/OEM cannot identify the combinations of pressure and speed and

load steps for which the unit will experience pin non-reversal (failure to lubricate

crosshead pin) issues, then either consider an alternate packager/OEM or have these

determined by in-house or third-party software.

An initial review covering all load steps, all speed, all throws, and all stages should be determined acrossthe entire defined operating map of suction and discharge pressures. If any issues with rod loads or pin

reversal exist, then all load steps that might contribute to those problem areas need to be reviewed in

more detail.

For each load step having rod load, or pin reversal issues, a detailed map of where the issues exist is

required before automating the unit. Otherwise, the automation algorithms may allow the unit to operate

in unsafe territory. For fixed-speed units, a single speed is sufficient. For variable speed units, acomplete review of all speeds (orat least maximum, medium, and minimum speeds) is required.


10/28




Individual Load Steps Rod Load Plot

Details Worst Case of All Operating Speeds

PS vs. PD vs. Percent of Rod Load Rating

Individual Load Steps Pin Reversal Plot

At One Particular Speed

PS vs. PD vs. Minimum Degrees of Reversal

Do Full Unit Reviews

ALL Load Steps, ALL Speeds, ALL Pressure Combinations

The adjacent plot details where the unit experiencesits worst cases for Pin Non-reversals, when the unit

is running between 60% and 100% of Rated Load.

This one plot covers all load steps, all speeds, and

all pressure combinations.

PS vs. PD vs. Minimum Degrees of Reversal


11/28




Individual Load Steps Safety Plot for Rod Load

and Pin Non-reversal Issues

Plot Results are Based on a Single Load Step:

Suction Pressure vs. Discharge Pressure, All

Speeds, and Various Suction Temperatures perStage Combinations.

Red Areas: Always Unsafe,and Why

Green Areas: Always Safe

Yellow Areas: Some Areas are Unsafe,and Why


12/28




Highest Expected Discharge Temperature and Discharge Pressure Maps

Discharge Temperature and Pressure Maps Required Item

Item(s) Highest Expected Discharge Temperature and Discharge Pressure Maps per stage, at least

for average and maximum suction temperatures.

Reason(s) Used to verify coolers are sufficient to cool the volumes of gas being discharged from the

expected discharge temperatures to the required aftercooler temperatures, and to avoid

potentially adverse operating conditions.

Response If packager/OEM cannot provide these maps, then they need to provide runs

reflecting operations at conditions where highest discharge temperatures and highest

interstage discharge pressures are expected. These select runs need to include

information required to verify interstage coolers and aftercoolers performance.

To verify that the supplied cooler(s) is(are) sized properly, a full review of possible dischargetemperatures across the entire operating map is required.

Tables should be created for each stage and shouldreflect the highest discharge temperatures possible

considering all safe load steps (across all speeds), and

should be done at least for the minimum and maximumgas suction temperatures per stage. To properly review

coolers, it is also necessary to know the flow rates

associated with each of the expected maximum discharge

temperatures.

Discharge Temperature (F) Maps:

Stage Table View 3D View

Stage-1

Max=276 F, Min=105 F


13/28




Stage-2

Max=307 F, Min=292 F

Sometimes, especially for systems with under-sized coolers, sidestreams in/out, or refrigeration

processes between stages, it is necessary to determine the maximum discharge pressure per stage. Ifrequired, tables and plots similar to the ones above should be generated for discharge pressures per

stage.


14/28




Sidestream Reviews

Sidestream Review Required Item if Sidestreams are Present

Item(s) Review methods used to model units with sidestreams (fixed flow rate method or fixed

pressure method).

Reason(s) Varies based on purpose of sidestreams. Required to predict unit flow, unit load, composite

gas composition, etc.

Response If the packager/OEM cannot identify loads, flow rates, and gas thermodynamics for

sidestreams involved, then it may be critical that these are accurately determined by

in-house or third-party software.

OEM software packages allow for inclusion of

sidestreams into and out of the gas system between

compressor stages. Sidestreams may come from aprocess, go to fuel engines, result from dropouts of

heavier gases, etc. In any case, the interstage fromwhich the sidestream emanates can normally be

modeled in one of two ways: interstage pressure

fluctuates or interstage pressure is held fairlyconstant.

Case I: Static Flow Rates / Varying Pressures:

For sidestreams out, a static flow rate istypically specified.

For sidestreams in, a static flow rate istypically specified, along with the gastemperature and a gas analysis of the

sidestream.These types of models assume that the sidestream volumes per stage are constant and the sidestream

pressures fluctuate as needed to maintain the indicated static flow rates. Most OEM software can

effectively model these types of sidestreams.

Case II: Static Ratios / Varying Flow Rates / Varying Pressures:Sidestream flow rates are varied so as to maintain a constant ratio of compressed gas with sidestreamgas. This is often done by precisely specifying the ratios of the gases, or indicating that the

sidestream gas is a fixed percent (mole weight) of the total gas to be compressed on each stage.

Sidestream gas temperatures and gas analyses are specified per each stream in.

Case III: Varying Flow Rates / Static Pressures:If the pressures to the interstages are being held fairly constant via sidestream sources (in or out), the

end-user needs to clarify this to the packager/OEM. Thus, in this situation, the flow rates of thesidestreams vary while the pressures stay relatively constant. End-users need to consult with their

packager/OEM to see if these types of sidestreams are effectively modeled.


15/28




For simple and complex systems, individual performance points are useful in any of the above cases.

However, full performance (curves, tables, plots, etc.) over a units entire operating range can be verymisleading if the wrong case is modeled. In general, full performance can readily be completed for

Cases I and II.

Case III can present problems as final required loads and flows are further dependent upon dynamic

sidestream flows required to maintain constant interstage pressures. End-users should specify exactly

what types of plots, curves, tables, etc. they desire. In many cases, the end-user may have to create theirown reports based on using the OEM software to generate multiple point performance runs. Customized

software can be ideal for these more complex sidestream applications.

Formation of Liquids

In general, liquids should never form inside the

compressor. However, depending upon the

thermodynamic properties of the fluid being

compressed, this can happen. In general, theOEM/packager can review the range of pressures

and temperatures for which the gas is exposed to

make sure that liquids do not form within thecylinder.

By reviewing the pressures and temperaturesexperienced as the gas migrates through the

compression process, the software can determinewhen, and how much, liquid is formed from thegas as dropout.

For exotic gases, much care needs to be taken to make sure that the thermodynamic model used in the

compressor performance software can properly model that gas across the pressure and temperature

envelopes. If not, then a high-end thermodynamic model for gas properties may be required. Operationsnear critical areas (such as the triple point or phase transitions) need to be carefully designed and

meticulously implemented.

Also, prodigious care should be taken to ensure that the

thermodynamic model being used is valid for each gas mixture being

reviewed. Otherwise, any performance results may be completely

baseless.

Hi h CO2 Natural Gas


16/28




Unit Robustness Map

Unit Robustness Map Required for Automated Operations: Recommended for Manual

Operations

Item(s) Unit Robustness Map across all pressure combinations indicates relative ease for

automating the unit.

Reason(s) Used by automation groups to identify how difficult and time-consuming the process of

automating this unit will be. Identifies how sensitive the units safety is to changes inspeed, temperatures and load step. It can also serve to identify how difficult it can be to

keep the unit safe while in manual operation.

Response If the packager/OEM cannot create these maps, then have these determined by in-

house or third-party software.

These maps review all load steps, across all speed ranges, across various combinations of suction gastemperatures per stage, for all combinations of suction and discharge pressures permitted for this unit.

As such, these maps can take hours to generate (often from 1 million to 150 million performance pointsare calculated to render these types of maps). However, the resulting plot can help the end-user evaluate

how effectively the unit can be used in certain areas of the operating map, as well as assessing the

complexity of automating the unit.

Areas of bright green (always

safe) and bright red (always

unsafe) are regions for whichrelatively straightforward PLC

algorithms can safely control the

unit. Areas of darker green andorange indicate the need for more

complex controls. In general, themore bands of color, the more

complex the unit will be to safely

automate darker bands indicatethat some of the normally valid

and safe load steps will become

unsafe simply due to changes inspeed or suction temperatures

(number in cell indicates the

maximum number of load steps

that can possibly be used).


17/28




Performance Curves

Performance Curves Highly Recommended

Item(s) Suction Pressure vs. Load Suction Pressure vs. Flow Discharge Pressure vs. Load Discharge Pressure vs. Flow Suction Pressure vs. Discharge Pressure, per load step. Sets of above curves from maximum speed to minimum speed in decrements of no

more than 50 RPM (for high speed) and 20 RPM for low speed.

Reason(s) Used by operators and/or simple control panels to safely control the unit across its definedoperating map. Curves help to identify where safety issues exist that render certain load

steps unsafe for use at current operating conditions.

Response If curves are not provided, then buyer can often create them with their own software,

or via third-party software. However, curves may not exactly match OEMs

performance predictions and cutoff for safety. If the OEM curves cannot be tuned to

real-world measured data, then their importance is diminished, and third-party

performance curves that can be tuned are favored.

End-users should not allow packagers/OEMs to go skimpy on curves. This can be done by making sure

all generated curves are based on at least fifty (50) performance points per load step curve. Sometimes

the supplier only uses five (5) to ten (10) points per curve. Use of a low number of points can lead not

only to jagged plots, but more importantly can lead to unsafe areas being shown as safe, or safe areas

being shown as unsafe. An exception would be if the unit does not have a lot of cutoffs due to rod loads

and/or pin non-reversals, then the use of at least twenty (20) points per curve is usually OK.

For units utilizing a variable speed driver, each set of curves should be generated at various speeds from

maximum speed down to minimum speed in decrements of no more than 50 RPM (for high-speed) and20 RPM for low-speed units. Failure to cover speed ranges can lead to situations where rod loads and/or

pin non-reversal issues are not properly disclosed. Curves that look good at rated speed may be seriously

clipped due to pin non-reversal at minimum speeds. Curves that look good at minimum speeds may beseriously clipped due to rod load issues at maximum speeds. There are also cases where curves that look

good at rated speeds and minimum speeds may be seriously clipped at in-between speeds due to rod

loads and/or pin non-reversal issues.

End-users need to specify which types of curves the supplier is required to deliver.


18/28




Suction Pressure vs. Load Curves Discharge Pressure vs. Load Curves

Suction Pressure vs. Flow Curves Discharge Pressure vs. Flow Curves

For units with fixed-speed drivers (and not a wide range of suction gas temperatures) thumbnail plots

(a.k.a. thumbprints) may be an ideal alternative to the standard performance curves. These curves, one

per each load step, detail safe regions as well as required power for all combinations of suction anddischarge pressures. Curves can highlight required power (top plot), deliverable flow rates, or both

(bottom plot).


19/28




Regardless of what types of curves are specified, all curves generated must reflect pressure drops based

on changing operating conditions, and not just on a single, fixed pressure drop used across the entire

operating map unless the specified operating map is quite narrow.


20/28




Flow Maps

Flow Maps Suggested Item

Item(s) Flow Maps from minimum to maximum desired flows, in user-specified increments.

Reason(s) Used by Gas Control/Dispatch to quickly identify when specific units can be used toachieve companys flow requirements.

Response If the packager/OEM cannot create these maps, then these can often be created by in-


Flow Maps, from the units minimum achievableflow rate to its maximum achievable flow rate in

user-specified increments, are ideal for Gas

Control/Dispatch. These plots allow for a quick

lookup of where the compressor can effectivelyflow a certain amount of gas. Gas

Control/Dispatch rarely are concerned withparticulars such as unit speed and load step, but

rather they are more concerned with the volume

of gas moving through the system based uponavailable inlet and discharge pressures.

In the adjacent example, suction pressure (x-axis)

is plotted against discharge pressure (y-axis). Thegreen areas indicate where the unit can achieve

the desired flow rate of 30 MMscfd, white areas

are where it is unsafe to run the unit, yellow areas are where it cannot flow the desired flow rate, and redareas indicate that the unit cannot be turned down enough to meet the desired flow rate.

A series of these plots can then be generated for 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45 and 50 MMscfd to cover the

range of flow rates possible with this unit. Now, Gas Control can just reference these plots to quickly

decide if this unit can be used to help achieve specific flow rates.

Alternatively, some users may prefer Flow versus Discharge Pressure plots of specific Suction

Pressures. While this type of plot is not quite as complete or informative as Flow Maps, it can besignificantly more compact as it details ranges in suction pressure, discharge pressure, and flow all in

one graph.

30 MMscfd


21/28




Unit Isentropic Efficiency Map

Isentropic Efficiency Map Suggested Item

Item(s) Unit Isentropic Efficiency Map (at least at rated speed) across all pressure combinations.

Reason(s) Identifies efficiency of compressor. If the data from an acoustic study and the resultingcorrections to required unit loading due to attenuation devices are included, then the map

gives the efficiency of the system from header to header. Note: use of certain attenuation

devices, such as orifice plates, can sometimes significantly reduce system efficiency evenif the compressors themselves are quite efficient.

Response If an isentropic efficiency map is not provided, then packager/OEM should at least

identify the unit and overall system efficiencies at the design and guarantee points.

While there are different ways to measure the effectiveness of a compressor, one common method is the

use of Isentropic Efficiency. This method gives a percent of effectiveness by taking the amount oftheoretical power that should be required to compress the gas and dividing it by the amount of power a

unit eventually needs to compress the gas.

Part of the total power losses is related to the compressor (gas passageways, valves, frictional losses,

etc.) and part is related to the acoustic dampening systems (bottles, orifice plates, choke tubes, etc.).(Readers may want to review a few GMC papers available at www.GMRC.org for more details on

differences on compressor specific methods versus system-specific methods.)

The supplier should make it clear whether the supplied map is just for the compressor, or for the entiresystem. In general, the entire system map is best as it details the actual situation. However, if the

pulsation dampening system is very restrictive to gas flow, the resulting isentropic efficiency map may

look as if the compressor is not very efficient. The best situation is to generate both models. Asignificant difference between them indicates a very costly (in terms of power and reduced flows)

acoustic dampening system. For high-speed units needing a lot of single-acting compression, this isoften the price paid to utilize a wide range of unloading capabilities (often the case for units used for

injection and withdrawal services).


22/28




PS vs. PD vs. Unit Isentropic Efficiency (%)

Isentropic Efficiency =GasCompresstoRequiredPowerActual

GasCompresstoRequiredPowerlTheoretica

A similar graph that details the

amount of required load per unit

of flow (often referred to asBHP/MM) can highlight areas

where the unit is less efficient.

Since these plots are based on

how much power is required to

compress each unit of flow,

they are often used in part fordollar-based decisions since

many end-users have historic

data available for estimatinghow much they spend per

horsepower used.


23/28




Compression Ratio Maps

Compression Ratio Maps Suggested Item

Item(s) Provide Compression Ratio Maps across all pressure combinations per stage. Report

should generate maximum (and if requested, minimum) compression ratios.

Reason(s) Used to help balance compression ratios across stages, and sometimes used to maintain

safety related to rod load issues. Also, higher ratios usually lead to higher discharge

temperatures.



Ratios of compression per stage may be required for controlling rod loads, controlling temperatures, or

balancing unloading across stages. Tables of data should be created for each stage, and should reflect the

highest and lowest ratios possible considering all safe load steps (across all speeds).

Compression Ratio Maps:

Stage Table View Ranges

Stage-1Max = 4.0

Min = 1.8

Average = 2.1

Stage-2Max = 4.4

Min = 1.0

Average = 2.1


24/28




Load Step Curvature Reviews

Load Step Curvature Suggested ItemItem(s) Load Step Curvature Review is used to identify which load steps (and where) are quite

steep in nature, and thus small changes in pressure can have significant changes in load andflow. Also, steep load step curves tend to be more difficult to tune and automate.

Reason(s) Identifies units that have unreasonably steep load curves, which in turn create problems

with operations and tuning. Note: Units with steep load curves are often not sized correctly.



Often, when reviewing performance based on just simple performance points, the end-user may notnotice how fast load and flow can change based on small changes in pressure. A review of the steepness

of the proposed load curves can quickly identify this type of issue. Often, steep load curves may indicateimproper sizing of cylinders.

In the adjacent plot, green

identifies areas of relative

flatness, while yellow identifyareas of normal curvature to

be expected, and orange areas

reflect where the curves arebecoming a bit too steep. Red

areas are unsafe areas for this

load step. Large areas ofgreen and yellow are ideal.

Some areas of orange are to

be expected, but these areasshould only represent a small

portion of the overall safe

operating map.

Units with steep load step

curves can prove difficult to

automate and tune. This is

due to the inherent nature ofthose load steps generating

large changes in load andflow for relatively small

changes in pressure.


25/28




Full Acoustic Review

Full Review of Unit Acoustics Across Entire Operating Map Suggested Item

Item(s) Acoustic Report. Detailed acoustics reports of performance at design and guarantee points,

review of thousands of potential operating points with identification of areas in the

operating map where vibration and acoustic issues may still be present even withattenuation devices in place. Provide data in a useable format (for use in OEM/third-party

compressor modeling software) for tuning load, flow and pressure drops across entire

operating map.

Reason(s) Often, acoustic reviews are performed centered around the design and guarantee points.

However, the attenuation devices specified by this review may not fully dampen allpulsations within API guidelines, especially the pulsations that affect loads and flows.

Thus, unforeseen shaking forces may be experienced at certain combinations of pressure,

speed and load step. Furthermore, initial software/PLC predictions of load and flow maynot adequately reflect load and flow accurately enough for safe unit operations.

Response If the company performing the acoustic review (and thus specifying attenuation

devices to add to the system to prevent dangerous levels of vibration) cannot perform

a review across the entire map, then:

1. Accept report as-is and accept possible consequences, or2. Include additional points in the original specification to at least potentially

identify some problem areas, and to learn more about what may happen

within the specified operating map. or

3. Specify a company that is capable of performing a full acoustic review.

These reports vary a lot and can be quite voluminous. In regards to

performance, the end-user needs to review areas in the report thatindicate how static and dynamic pressure drops affect both the

required power and the subsequent flow rates. Failing to peruse theseareas may lead to compressor installations with insufficient driver

power.


26/28




OriginalCompressorPerformance

CompressorPerformance withDynamic Effects

Included

Original CurvesOverlaid in Red to

Highlight PotentialDifferences.

The following sources have a plethora of recent information about the effects from pulsations on

reciprocating compressors:

Integrating Compressor Performance with the Effects of Pressure Pulsation across a UnitsEntire Operating Map, GMC-2007 Paper (ACI/Ariel/Beta Machinery)

ARCT & GMRC Pulsation Control Project Update, GMC-2007 Paper (SwRI) An Investigation of the Application of Finite Amplitude Wave Tuning Technology for ControllingReciprocating Compressor Pulsations, GMC-2007 Paper (ACI/Optimum Power) Evaluation of Pulsation Levels at Reciprocating Compressor Installations, GMC-2007 Paper

(SwRI)

Advanced Pulsation Control Devices Ready for Field Tests, GM Journal, 2nd Quarter, May2007

GMRC Advanced Reciprocating Compressor Technology (ARCT), CompressorTechTwo, June& July 2007, (SwRI)


27/28




Implementation of Compressor Performance

While requiring a full review of unit potential before purchase can quickly identify the strengths and

shortcomings of that unit when compressing within a specified operating map, many end-users also needthe ability to implement similar-to-OEM performance modeling in PLCs (programmable logic

controller). This is required so that the PLC can safely control the compressor while optimizing it for

load, flow, or fuel usage. The failure to model a unit similar to how the OEM would model that unit can

not only lead to warranty disputes, but also to operations at potentially unsafe operating conditions.

The main safety-related items are: high pressures, high temperatures, rod loads, and pin non-reversals.

Of these, standard real-time sensors can readily identify high pressures and high temperatures. There aredevices currently available for measuring dynamic, internal gas pressures and thus inferring real-time

rod load forces and crosshead pin forces. However, these devices are not prevalent in the gas

compression industry at this time.

Therefore, it becomes very important that

each compressor OEM properly discloseexactly how they warrant their equipment

in regards to determining rod load and

crosshead pin forces: what equations are

used, what pressures (if any) are used,what weights (if any) are used, what

other OEM-specific criteria are

implemented, etc.

In short, for these types of safety items,end-users not only need to know requiredweights and limits, but how those items

are used in determining if the unit can be

safely operated at a specific operatingpoint, at a specific speed, and at a

specific load step configuration.

Note: While a simple pressure differential can be useful in keeping reciprocating compressors out of rod

loads, this method is usually insufficient for high-speed units. Most high-speed OEMs base rod load and

pin reversal calculations on internal gas pressures, which vary based on speed due to the pressure

drops associated with valve velocities and gas passageways. Furthermore, regardless of whether theOEM uses inertia forces for rod load calculations, all high-speed OEMs use inertia for pin non-reversal

calculations. Inertia forces are a function of reciprocating weights and rotation speed. Thus, simple

pressure differentials fail to cover safety issues related to pin non-reversals.


28/28



Building upon the Solid Cornerstone of Compressor Performance

From the beginning of large scale reciprocating compressors, there has been a need to predict unit

performance and operational safety. Some of the industrys fundamental research and development usedextensively as the thermodynamic basis for many compressor performance models were developed and

written by William Bill Hartwick. Two key papers are Efficiency Characteristics of ReciprocatingCompressors (December 1968, ASME technical paper 68-WA/DGP-3), and Power Requirements and

Associated Effects of Reciprocating Compressor Cylinder Ends Deactivated by Internal Bypassing(April 1975, ASME technical paper 75-DGP-9). Together, these papers set many standards for

effectively predicting reciprocating compressor performance. Bills thermodynamic talents were

paralleled, referenced and expanded upon by others, such as Ed Miller (thermodynamics, softwaredevelopment, and automation) and Derek Woollatt (thermodynamics, valve dynamics, and hardware

innovation).

Bill HartwickCooper

Ed MillerACI Services

Derek WoollattDresser-Rand

Once formal mathematical models based on the actual physics of gas compression were developed,

computer software models naturally evolved. Hartwicks paper On-Site Computer PredictedCompressor Performance (March 1982, ASME technical paper 82-DGP-26) covers an actualimplementation of computer-aided compressor performance for optimizing and safely controlling

compressors. Performance software continued to mature and thus provided engineers with the abilities to

review unit performance with better proficiency, and across a broader spectrum, which in turn allowed

engineers to more completely review and evaluate how hardware changes subsequently affected unitperformance and safety.

History tells us that compressor performance started with hand-calculated point performance, advancedto software-calculated point performance, then advanced to software-generated performance curves, and

now has evolved to allow engineers and end-users to render 3-D plots, complex tabled-data, animated

compressor performance plots and more. Nevertheless, whether doing a few points by slide rule, or afew million points by computer, the thermodynamic-based equations have not changed a lot in the last

fifty years, thanks to the well-defined and flexible mathematical models developed by individuals such

what performance do you really need

Documents