what did continua do with cda? interface to ehr and phr systems keith naylor december 2009

21
What did Continua do with CDA? Interface to EHR and PHR systems Keith Naylor December 2009

Upload: marylou-lamb

Post on 24-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: What did Continua do with CDA? Interface to EHR and PHR systems Keith Naylor December 2009

What did Continua do with CDA?Interface to EHR and PHR systems

Keith NaylorDecember 2009

Page 2: What did Continua do with CDA? Interface to EHR and PHR systems Keith Naylor December 2009

Agenda

• Background– Who are Continua?– The ‘Continua Technology Stack’– The ‘HRN-IF’ (previously known as xHR)

• CDA, CCD and PHM within the HRN-IF• Example and demo (if we have a live web connection)

2

Page 3: What did Continua do with CDA? Interface to EHR and PHR systems Keith Naylor December 2009

Continua – who are they?

• The Continua Health Alliance’s mission:– to establish an ecosystem of interoperable personal

health systems that empower people and organizations to better manage their health and wellness.

• The charter of Continua’s Technical Working Group (TWG):– is to select the standards and specifications necessary

to meet this vision and to define Design Guidelines that further clarify the standards and specifications that guarantee seamless interoperability is achieved.

3

Page 4: What did Continua do with CDA? Interface to EHR and PHR systems Keith Naylor December 2009

The Continua Technology Stack

4

WAN-In

terfa

ce

LAN-In

terfa

ce

PAN-In

terfa

ce

HRN-In

terfa

ce

Application Hosting Device

LAN Device

PAN DeviceTele-Health WAN Device

HealthRecordDevice

X

Page 5: What did Continua do with CDA? Interface to EHR and PHR systems Keith Naylor December 2009

Heath Record Network - IF

• The purpose of the HRN interface:– is to transfer patient information from a Continua

WAN device (HRN Sender) to either another WAN device or an electronic health record device (HRN Receiver)

• The HRN Sender can be:– A Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) server of a

Disease Management service provider – An Application Server of an Aging Independently

or Health & Fitness service provider

5

Page 6: What did Continua do with CDA? Interface to EHR and PHR systems Keith Naylor December 2009

Heath Record Network - IF

• The patient information for transfer may include:– report summarizing the patient’s current status,– a detailed listing of specific patient results,– readings from one or more personal health devices,– or a combination of these.

• The electronic health record device may contain:– hospital’s Enterprise Health Record (EHR),– physician’s Electronic Medical Record (EMR)– Personal Health Record service (PHR) used by the

patient.

6

Page 7: What did Continua do with CDA? Interface to EHR and PHR systems Keith Naylor December 2009

HRN-IF Standards Selection

• Data: To facilitate the accurate transfer of both coded patient results from personal health devices and textual summary results from patient care-givers, the HL7 Personal Healthcare Monitoring Report document format standard was chosen.

• NOTE: The Data Guidelines are based on the HL7 CDA R2 standard, profiled by the HL7 Personal Healthcare Monitoring

(PHM) Implementation Guide.

7

Page 8: What did Continua do with CDA? Interface to EHR and PHR systems Keith Naylor December 2009

HRN-IF Standards Selection

• Messaging: A future is envisioned where patient information is sent between providers by various methods. These methods include: secure direct connection over the Internet, secure email, delivery on portable media (data stick, etc.), through a messaging hub, and through a data repository or RHIO / NHIN.

• To facilitate this, a messaging standard capable of supporting all five transport methods with a minimal amount of re-work was chosen. That is, once the first transport method was accomplished, incorporating additional transport methods require less work.

• In addition, because this interface is used to communicate with non-Continua certified electronic health records, a messaging standard supported by others that certify electronic health record systems was chosen.

• For these reasons, Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise’s (IHE) Cross-Enterprise Document Sharing (XDS) profile was chosen.

8

Page 9: What did Continua do with CDA? Interface to EHR and PHR systems Keith Naylor December 2009

HRN-IF Standards Selection

• Transport Protocol: To accomplish secure direct communication of pertinent patient information between care-givers, the IHE XDR (Cross-Enterprise Document Reliable interchange) profile utilizes current standards such as SOAP 1.2 and MTOM.

• To accomplish secure indirect communication of pertinent patient information between care-givers, the IHE Cross-Enterprise Document Media Interchange (XDM) profile utilizes current standards such as Zip and S-MIME.

9

Page 10: What did Continua do with CDA? Interface to EHR and PHR systems Keith Naylor December 2009

CDA,CCD and PHMR

• The data transmitted from the HRN Sender can be either summary, raw data or both. The summarization may be a result of analysis by an authentic disease management service provider. The data has multiple characteristics that include:– Representation of measurements captured by devices– Representation of notes, summary, and other kinds of

narrative information that are added by care givers or by the user themselves

– Representation of graphs that are added by intermediary devices that represent trends of user’s health

10

Page 11: What did Continua do with CDA? Interface to EHR and PHR systems Keith Naylor December 2009

CDA,CCD and PHMR

• To accommodate the wide variety of data characteristics, the HL7 Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) based format is chosen.

• The guidelines specify constraints on the CDA in accordance with requirements set forward by the HRN interface.

• These constraints are laid out in the Personal Healthcare Monitoring Report (PHMR) Implementation Guide**.

• Wherever possible, the PHM report reuses the templates already set forth by an HL7 specification called Continuity of Care Document (CCD).

• Note: **HL7 PHM Report Implementation Guide will have an independent lifecycle under a project called “Personal Health Monitoring Report” under the HL7.org Structured Documents Workgroup (SDWG).

11

Page 12: What did Continua do with CDA? Interface to EHR and PHR systems Keith Naylor December 2009

PHMR

Implementation Guide for CDA Release 2.0Personal Healthcare Monitoring Report (PHMR)

(International Realm)

Draft Standard for Trial Use

Release 1 

 

First Release

November 2008

12

Page 13: What did Continua do with CDA? Interface to EHR and PHR systems Keith Naylor December 2009

PHMR Data Model

13

Dev ice

+ Syste mType+ Manufacturer+ Mod el+ Device ID: EUI-64

Observ ation

+ Observat ionType+ DateTim eStamp

Value

Nume ric

+ Units+ Accuracy [0..1]

Wav eform

+ Sample Period+ Sampl eSize+ Attachment+ Accuracy [0..1]

Ev e nt

+ EventCode

AlertFlag

+ Flag Code

Component

Vital Signs

Medica tions

Exercise

Activ ity

{XOR}

PHMRe port

+ Creation Date/Time+ Document Identifier+ Documen t Code+ Lang uage+ Version+ Healthcare Provider

1. .*

0. .1

1

1

0..*1. .*

1. .*

0..*

HL7 v3 - RIM

Page 14: What did Continua do with CDA? Interface to EHR and PHR systems Keith Naylor December 2009

PHMR Data Model

14

PHM Report Header

Creation Date/Time - when the report was generated

Actors and identification

Describes and identifies all individuals, organizations, locations and systems with data in this document (Patient name, Patient ID, Patient demographics, Document author ID, Author name, Author demographics, Doctor name, Doctor ID)

Purpose Purpose of the document (e.g., “diabetes care progress note)

Remote Monitoring Notes

Update/Notes/summary information by a remote monitoring service provide (e.g., narrative information that may include graphs, pictures, trends)

Functional status

This is a place holder for free form text written by RPM care givers, may include interpretation of care givers perspective of RPM information

Device Information

Information of the devices that are used to collect observations (e.g., BP cuff, glucometer)

System Type System Model System ID Device Configuration ID Production Spec (Serial Number,

Part number, hardware revision, firmware revision, protocol revision)

Regulatory information

Vital sign data

Measurement observations of vital signs

Unified Code for Units of Measure (UCUM)

Nomenclature mapped primarily to SNOMED CT (with IEEE 11073 and LOINC as necessary)

Medication compliance data

Describes current medications and patient adherence

Page 15: What did Continua do with CDA? Interface to EHR and PHR systems Keith Naylor December 2009

Example PHMR

• The following slides illustrate the following:

– A series of readings taken by a patient using a Roche Glucose Meter

– Transmitted to a Device Monitoring System, which creates the CDA/PHMR

– Which is then transmitted to an IBM HRN gateway– Viewed using the NHS CfH Workbench utilising a

standard XSLT transformation into HTML

– If we have a live web connection I can demonstrate the retrieval and display of a PHMR from an online IBM data repository

15

Page 16: What did Continua do with CDA? Interface to EHR and PHR systems Keith Naylor December 2009

Continua Connectivity Demo

16

Continua Connectivity Demo

Page 17: What did Continua do with CDA? Interface to EHR and PHR systems Keith Naylor December 2009

17

ACCU-CHEK® 360˚ Diabetes Management Software Continua HRN

(xHR)

HRN Gateway

Continua – USB Devices

Page 18: What did Continua do with CDA? Interface to EHR and PHR systems Keith Naylor December 2009

Example PHMR – CfH Workbench

18

Page 19: What did Continua do with CDA? Interface to EHR and PHR systems Keith Naylor December 2009

NHS CfH Workbench

19

Page 20: What did Continua do with CDA? Interface to EHR and PHR systems Keith Naylor December 2009

Google Health

20

Page 21: What did Continua do with CDA? Interface to EHR and PHR systems Keith Naylor December 2009

Questions ?

21