welcome to the g heights ncp area #3 - surrey.ca meeting #4_october_19_2017(final).pdfc ncp 3...

GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS NEIGHBOURHOOD CONCEPT PLAN AREA #3 GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS NEIGHBOURHOOD CONCEPT PLAN AREA #3 1

GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS NCP AREA #3

Oct 19, 2017

WELCOME TO THE

CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC) MEETING #4

For more information visit the city of surrey webpage at: www.surrey.ca/gh3ncp

CAC Meeting

http://www.surrey.ca/gh3ncp

GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS NEIGHBOURHOOD CONCEPT PLAN AREA #3

MEETING AGENDA

2 GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS NEIGHBOURHOOD CONCEPT PLAN AREA #3 CAC Meeting

Agenda Outline

1: Welcome 2: Environmental Study Results 3: Status Update Heritage Study 4: Hazelmere Estates Meeting Update 5: Land Use Ideas & Discussion 8: Questions & Comments

A

B

C

D

E

F


ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY FINAL RESULTS

GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS NEIGHBOURHOOD CONCEPT PLAN AREA #3 CAC Meeting

A

SEE SEPARATE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY PRESENTATION”

-Stephen Godwin-

3


HERITAGE STUDY UPDATE


“HERITAGE STUDY VERBAL STATUS UPDATE ON ONGOING CONUSLTATION”

-Fay Wong-

B

4


HAZELMERE ESTATES MEETING SUMMARY


C

The City of Surrey held Suburban Land Owner meeting in a portion of the Grandview Heights NCP #3 area, to:

1.Provide general background and update on the progress of the Grandview Heights (NCP) #3 planning process;

2.Gauge the level of support or opposition to land use changes (in the long term), Acreage and Suburban Residential uses and/or future urban densities.

The Big Question: Retain Suburban Lots

or Consider Urban Development in the Long Term?

5


HAZELMERE ESTATES MEETING SUMMARY


C

NCP 3 Boundary

Suburban Area

6


MEETING ATTENDANCE & SURVEY


C

ATTENDANCE: (22 of 25) 88% of

Landowners invited attended the meeting

7


*OPTION 4* ALTERNATIVE(S)?

HAZELMERE ESTATES MEETING OPTIONS


C

NO CHANGE TOSUBURBAN CORE EVER;

STATUS QUO SUBURBANDEVELOPMENT SURROUNDING

*OPTION 1* NO CHANGE TO

SUBURBAN CORE EVER; TRANSITIONAL DENSITYCHANGES AROUND OUTSIDE

PERIPHERY ONLY

*OPTION 2* *OPTION 3* RESTRICT CHANGE TO

1 ACRE ESTATE CORE FOR 10-15 YEARS;

ALLOW CHANGE FOROUTSIDE PERIPHERYSHORT TERM AND

CORE IN LONG TERM WITH CONDITIONS.

8

Presenter

Presentation Notes

4th option (Alternatives) provided to allow residents to express alternative options, desires in short/medium/long term.


HAZELMERE SURVEY RESULTS (BY RESPONSE)


C

RESPONSE TOTALS BY OPTION: (2 of 25) 8% choose Option 1 (0 of 25) 0% choose Option 2 (4 0f 25) 16% choose Option 3 (13 of 25) 52% choose Option 4

9


HAZELMERE SURVEY RESULTS (SUMMATION)


C

RESPONSE TOTALS SURVEY FEEDBACK DESCRIPTIONS (14 of 25) 56% choose“Future Urban Density” (8 of 25) 32% choose“Maintain Suburban Density” (3 0f 12) “Did Not Respond”

10

Presenter

Presentation Notes

Results tell us that opinions seemed to have changed for many in the Suburban lands since the time of the GLUP consultation. There is also still a core of residents who would prefer to remain and enclave of large estate style lots in the short, medium, and for some long term. Suburban residents are also interested in a larger transition of (Large Lots, or suburban uses surrounding the core.


HAZELMERE ESTATES CONSULTATION RESULTS


C

Outcomes of Survey • City will use consultation

results to inform future landuse discussion in the broaderNCP.

• Long term and short termplans of residents informstrategies, policies in the NCP.– Interim and Ultimate Uses

More Consultation • Future opportunities for

consultation / feedback willbe provided as part ofbroader NCP land useConcept Planning Process.– 2-3 Future Public Open Houses;– Additional meetings with

landowners as necessary.

11


QUESTIONS & COMMENTS

12 CAC Meeting

7


Stay up Here.

WARNING: HIGH LEVEL LAND USE DISCUSSION UP NEXT

Keep out of Here.

10,000 Feet

In the Weeds

CAC Meeting 13

D

Presenter

Presentation Notes

Land Use Discussion can be heated, and getting to detailed can take away from meaningful high level planning conversation. STAY AT 10,000 FT: Example: Where different housing forms should be located. (Higher density areas, lower density areas) Village / Nodes/ Schools, Parks (Large Central/Small mini) What are key features. (What is needed (Amenities/Housing) Walkability, Connections, Nodes KEEP OUT OF THE WEEDS: Example: Road dedication requirements What is my lot yield Individual tree preservation / requirements Traffic issues Building materials/styles/


OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN DIRECTION


D

Housing Neighbourhood Services

Parks, Recreation & Culture

Nature & Green Space

Streets & Pathways

14


NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS


D




Streets & Pathways

Diversity of housing types/sizes

NCP #3

Flexible housing forms

Higher densities along main roads, parks, civic

amenities

Housing fronts along main roads, parks, green

spaces

15

Presenter

Presentation Notes

Provide a wide range of diverse households and flexible forms of housing to support a diversity of housing sizes composition and rental opportunities. Direct higher residential densities along main roads, near transit routes and adjacent to major parks or civic amenities. Design housing units to front directly onto public streets and/or public spaces, in order to facilitate a safe, welcoming, public streetscape and public realm. Require detached housing with less than 12 m (40ft) frontage along a public street, to be accessed from back lanes. Plan for housing units to front onto riparian and green areas, to increase visibility onto those areas. Incorporate ‘live/work’ units in appropriate locations.




D




Streets & Pathways

NCP #3

Mixed use

Local-oriented shopping within walking distance Access

to Local Schools

Community Services

16

Presenter

Presentation Notes

Create mixed-use neighborhoods that support needs of local residents by including local-oriented shopping, services, schools and amenities within easy walking and cycling distance in order to reduce dependence on private vehicles. Work with school district to locate schools where they are safely and conveniently accessible by waling, cycling and public transit. Plan Neighbourhoods in consultation with School district to ensure that urban development population growth is considered in planning of new, appropriately sized and well located public schools.




D




Streets & Pathways

NCP #3

Indoor / Outdoor recreation

Walking distance to Parks

New Neighbourhood Parks

Gathering spaces

17

Presenter

Presentation Notes

Ensure indoor and outdoor recreation opportunities, neighbourhood parks, and amenities geared to youth. Locate Neighbourhood Parks and play areas within 400 m of most homes. Develop mini-parks and mini-plazas as outdoor gathering spaces in urban neighbourhoods.




D




Streets & Pathways

NCP #3

Access to natural areas

Trail connections

GIN Connections

Protected natural features

18

Presenter

Presentation Notes

Provide residents with visual and physical access to natural areas by establishing trail systems that connect with natural areas. Maintain natural ecosystem connections within neighbourhoods by minimizing road crossings through natural habitat corridors and riparian areas. Protect and retain significant trees, forest stands and other natural features. Incorporate natural open drainage systems and green infrastructure features. Encourage LEED-ND or similar “green” build development programs.




D




Streets & Pathways

NCP #3

Multiple modes of travel

Finer Grained Modified Grid

Limited road and driveway access to Major roads On site private/public

pathways

19

Presenter

Presentation Notes

Design local streets to allow multiple modes of travel and enhance pedestrian and cycling opportunities. Support easy, fluid, unobstructed movement of pedestrians through urban areas by planning local street network using finer-grained modified grid pattern. Connect on-site pathways on private property with public walkways and streets. Consider traffic calming methods and devises, where warranted. Limit direct access to arterial roads by supporting the use of rear lanes.




D




Streets & Pathways

Diversity of housing types/sizes

Flexible housing forms

Higher densities along main roads, parks, civic

amenities

Housing fronts along main roads, parks, green

spaces

Mixed use

Local-oriented shopping within walking distance Access

to Local Schools

Indoor / Outdoor recreation

Gathering spaces

Access to natural areas

Trail connections

GIN Connections

Protect natural features

Multiple modes of travel

Finer Grained Modified Grid

NCP #3

20

Limited road and driveway access to Major roads On site private/public

pathways

Community Services Walking distance to Parks

New Neighbourhood Parks


COMMON GREEN AREAS


D

Riparian Area

Existing Park

LEGEND

Wildlife Corridor

BCS COORIDOR

UPPPER SAM HILL CREEK HEADWATERS DARTS HILL

GARDEN PARK

SAM HILL CREEK TRIBUTARIES

21

Presenter

Presentation Notes

Note: green around the creeks is not representative of required ‘setback’ widths, but rather a graphic concept of the ‘major’ green infrastructure network in the plan. Specific Streamside setback as per City of Surrey Streamside Protection Setbacks in Zoning Bylaw. Wildlife Corridor Connection will connect Fergus Creek Watershed Park to Redwood Heights and NCP #4 Hub / Corridor. Existing Darts Hill Park.


GREEN WITH COMMON ‘ASSUMED MAJOR STREETS’


D

20 Ave

16 Ave

168 St

176 St 18 Ave 174St

171 St

Riparian Area

Existing Park

LEGEND

Wildlife Corridor

Highway 15

Existing Arterial

Existing Collector

Future Collector

22


TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL DENSITIES (GUIDE)


D

1 UPA 2UPA 4UPA 5 UPA 6UPA 8UPA 10UPA 12UPA 15UPA 20 UPA 25UPA 30 UPA 45UPA+

1 Acre Estates

½ Acre Estates

¼ Acre Single Family

Large Lot Detached Single Family

Small Lot Single Family

Multiple Residential

Row Housings

Stacked Townhouse

& Apartments

OCP

DESIGN

ATION

Townhouses

HIGH

LOW

SUBURBAN URBAN MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL

NCPs

23

Presenter

Presentation Notes

OCP Includes several


CONCEPT IDEA #1


D

20 Ave

16 Ave

168 St

176 St 18 Ave 174St

170 St

Suburban

Single Family

Multifamily

Commercial / Mixed Use

Institutional

School

Riparian Area

Park

LEGEND

Wildlife Corridor

Two Small Village / Nodes Suburban Core

Large Expansion of Darts Hill Park

24

171 St

Presenter

Presentation Notes

A: Suburban Core area. Transition of Single Family along 168 Street. Multifamily along 20 Ave (Future Bus/Transit Service) B: Future 170 Street banded with Multiple Residential development and a small Village Core bordered by Urban Park. Single Family interface along Riparian Corridors of Sam Hill Creek Tributaries. C: Small Neighbourhood Commercial Node at 176 and 20 Ave. D: Large Expansion of Darts Hill Park to 18 Ave. Unique Features: One Central Elementary School One Large Park with two small Neighbourhood Parks. Possible Unique Institutional Use adjacent to Darts Hill Park. Main Village Node along 170 Street, with future connection to Civic Core North of 24 Ave. Multifamily predominantly along 20 Ave, and 176 Street, and 170 Street. No High Density Townhouses or Apartment Densities.


CONCEPT IDEA #2


D

20 Ave

16 Ave

168 St

176 St

18 Ave 174St

171 St

LEGEND

Single Family

Multifamily

Townhouse / Apartment

Commercial / Mixed Use

Institutional

School

Riparian Area

Park

Wildlife Corridor

25

Two Large Village Nodes

Multifamily Along Sam Hill Creek Walk

Central Large Sam Hill Creek

Headwaters Park

Presenter

Presentation Notes

A: Mixed Use Village with Urban Park. High Density Townhouse/Apartments Transitioning to Multifamily and Single Family. Urban Park Interface to Commercial Village. B: Second smaller Village Node @ 176 St and 20 Ave. Higher Density Townhomes along 176 Street and Multifamily adjacent to 20 Ave. C: Multifamily (Face the Green) along the Sam Hill Creek greenway walk. D: Large Central Neighbourhood Level Park adjacent to Elementary School. Headwater Feature to the Sam Hill Creek Watershed. Unique Features: Two (East and West) Elementary Schools possible with additional density and student yields. Smaller expansion of Darts Hill park, along northern boundary. Possible Unique Institutional Use adjacent to Darts Hill Park. Redevelopment of Suburban Pocket in the Long Term (Mix of Urban Single Family and Multiple Residential) Multifamily along riparian corridors, and major roads (20 Ave, and 18 Ave) No Suburban areas long term, and includes High Density Townhouses or Apartment Densities near Village Nodes at 168 St and 20 Ave and 176 Street and 20 Ave.


COMPARE AND CONTRAST KEY FEATURES


D

CONCEPT IDEA #2 CONCEPT IDEA #1

26

171 St

20 Ave

16 Ave

168 St

176 St 18 Ave

174St

171 St

https://www.google.ca/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwi9vr6xrfvWAhXJy1QKHa4hCTQQjRwIBw&url=https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Discussion.png&psig=AOvVaw0tDhjQsqbxhF-ueJQ268M_&ust=1508456728038892


PREFRENCES, QUESTIONS, COMMENTS & IDEAS


D

1. What conceptual features do you like? Why?

2. What conceptual features could be done differently? Why?

3. Is there a combination of ideas you think make sense?

27

BREAK OUT SESSION (3 GROUPS)


STAGE 1 - PLANNING SCHEDULE

• Council authorized City Staff to begin the process of preparing a Stage 1 NCP for Grandview Heights NCP #3.

• Initial Public Open House #1

• Select a Citizen’s Advisory Committee (CAC) to work with the City to develop the NCP.

July 25th 2016

November 23rd 2016

Development Applications may be processed and advanced to Council for Consideration

Open House #1

January-February 2017

• Public Open House #2 – Draft Land Use Options

• Public Open House #3 – Preferred Land Use Concept

• Develop a Preferred Land Use Concept

• Present Draft Stage 1 Report to Council

Open House #2 Open House

#3

Late November 2017

February 2018

March 2018

• If Stage 1 is approved by Council, initiate Stage 2

April 2018

• Landowner petitions received by City

We Are Here

January – April 2016

Complete

CAC #1

CAC #2

CAC #3

CAC #4

CAC #5

CAC #6

CAC #7

*Note: NCP Planning Process Timelines are subject to change.

• Background studies, including an environmental study, heritage study, and an integrated stormwater management plan (ISMP).

• Develop Terms of Reference • City Staff works with the CAC

and other stakeholders, as required, to develop Draft Land Use Options.

28 CAC Meeting

E

Presenter

Presentation Notes

The Schedule shows the activities and approximate time frames associated with the major steps in the NCP #3 planning process. Infrastructure and engineering servicing planning, will be integral to the Stage 2 process, as will be extensive public consultation through committees, workshops and/or focus groups and meetings in Stage 1. At various milestones through the planning process public open houses will be held to invite comments, and status reports will be provided to Council. Where appropriate, input of the residents/property owners outside of the NCP area, business community and other stakeholders will be sought during the preparation of the NCP. As part of the planning process, at least two land use options will be developed for review and comment by the residents/owners, stakeholders, and other interested parties, before a preferred land use concept option is brought forward for final council consideration and approval. Following the adoption of a preferred stage 1 plan, stage 2 of the NCP will commence, and will include final servicing, and financial plans.


UPDATED CAC MEETING SCHEDULE PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #1 • Plan Initiation and CAC Establishment

CAC Meeting #1 March 28, 2017 - Inaugural Meeting • Meeting logistics, CAC Work Plan Review, Planning Context & Background.

CAC Meeting #2 May, 2017 • Visioning and identification of planning themes workshop.

CAC Meeting #3 July, 2017 • Initial Background Study Results, and Draft Planning Principles to achieve the vision & objectives.

CAC Meeting #4 October, 2017 • Background Study Updates, and Draft Land Use Concept Options workshop.

• . CAC Meeting #5 November 22, 2017 Land Use Concept Options

PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #2 (November 27, 2017) Land use Concept Options

CAC Meeting #6 December 2017 (IF REQUIRED) • Review/refine the preferred land use concept, servicing & transportation concepts

PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #3 • Preferred Land Use Concept and Servicing & Transportation Concepts

CAC Meeting #7 February- April, 2018 • Review comments from Public Open House #3, Refine/adjust the preferred land use concept.

We are here.

Stage 1

29 CAC Meeting

*Note: CAC Timelines are subject to change.

7

Note: May include additional CAC meetings as necessary during land use Concept Plan development.


QUESTIONS & COMMENTS

30 CAC Meeting

E


31 CAC Meeting

Email: [email protected]

Webpage: www.surrey.ca/ghncp3

PHONE: PATRICK KLASSEN, COMMUNITY PLANNING MANAGER (604) 598-5858 [email protected] MARKUS KISCHNICK, COMMUNITY PLANNER (604) 591-4485 [email protected]

City of Surrey Community Planning Division

13450 - 104 Avenue Surrey, BC, Canada

V3T 1V8

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.surrey.ca/ghncp3













welcome to the g heights ncp area #3 - surrey.ca meeting #4_october_19_2017(final).pdfc ncp 3...

Documents