we used the international classi˜cation of 267 respondents 132 … · 2020-06-25 · 267...

1
Australia & New Zealand 14 USA 79 Canada 7 Ireland 2 UK 151 Jersey 1 Portugal 1 Germany 1 Ghana 1 India 3 UAE 1 Turkey 1 Greece 1 Malaysia1 145 Speech and Language Professionals, 70 people with aphasia 30 friends and family , 22 others We used the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to frame our questions. We disseminated the survey via: A joint project between CDDFT and a Newcastle University student aimed at increasing understanding of the use of technology by people with aphasia, with the outcome of using this knowledge to drive service improvements. Over half of all tablets were service provider owned (56%). Service users were significantly more likely to own smart phones (80%). Aphasia and Technology Review County Durham and Darlington NHS Trust What hardware ? What barriers ? used for therapy to support communication for social media - including pupose of use to support access to information Which software? 267 respondents told us about 132 different software programmes/ apps they use to support communication/ access information/ access therapy. There were differences between groups: People with aphasia favoured main stream apps/ apps integral to their device (e.g Uber, Find my Friends, Grammerly, predictive texting). Apps that enhance access to life whilst minimising communicative demand. Speech and Language Therapists were more likely to recommend speech and language specific apps. Facebook was the most popular social media platform across all groups. People with aphasia/friends/family identified the importance of social media in accessing support networks and information. Sixty eight percent of professionals said they used social media for their own clinical professional development but only 44% said they would recommend social media sites to people with aphasia/ their friends/family. Kathy Cann and Louise Bulman Technology has changed the landscape of communication for everyone. It’s potential impact in supporting access to life, therapy and well -being for people with specific communication needs is as diverse as it is profound. For lots more information and discussion of how our results relate to the evidence base, download the full aphasia friendly article here: SCAN ME

Upload: others

Post on 20-Jul-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: We used the International Classi˜cation of 267 respondents 132 … · 2020-06-25 · 267 respondents told us about 132 di˜erent software programmes/ apps they use to support communication

Australia & New Zealand

14

USA79

Canada7

Ireland 2

UK151

Jersey 1Portugal 1

Germany 1

Ghana1 India

3UAE 1

Turkey 1Greece 1

Malaysia1

145 Speech and Language Professionals,

70 people with aphasia

30 friends and family,

22 others

We used the International Classi�cation of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to frame our questions.

We disseminated the survey via:

A joint project between CDDFT and a Newcastle University student aimed at increasing understanding of the use of

technology by people with aphasia, with the outcome of using this knowledge to drive service improvements.

Over half of all tablets were service provider owned (56%).Service users were signi�cantly more likely to own smart phones (80%).

Aphasia and Technology ReviewCounty Durham and Darlington NHS Trust

What hardware ?

What barriers ?

used for therapy to support communication

for social media - including pupose of use to support access to information

Which software?

267 respondents told us about 132 di�erent software programmes/ apps they use to support communication/ access information/ access therapy.

There were di�erences between groups: People with aphasia favoured main stream apps/ apps integral to their device (e.g Uber, Find my Friends, Grammerly, predictive texting). Apps that enhance access to life whilst minimising communicative demand. Speech and Language Therapists were more likely to recommend speech and language speci�c apps.Facebook was the most popular social media platform across all groups. People with aphasia/friends/family identi�ed the importance of social media in accessing support networks and information.Sixty eight percent of professionals said they used social media for their own clinical professional development but only 44% said they would recommend social media sites to people with aphasia/ their friends/family.

Kathy Cann and Louise Bulman

Technology has changed the landscape of communication for everyone.It’s potential impact in supporting access to life, therapy and

well -being for people with speci�c communication needs is as diverse as it is profound.

For lots more information and discussion of how our results relate to the evidence base, download the full aphasia friendly article here:

SCANME