we used the international classi˜cation of 267 respondents 132 … · 2020-06-25 · 267...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: We used the International Classi˜cation of 267 respondents 132 … · 2020-06-25 · 267 respondents told us about 132 di˜erent software programmes/ apps they use to support communication](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050212/5f5ea163184af666f706416a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Australia & New Zealand
14
USA79
Canada7
Ireland 2
UK151
Jersey 1Portugal 1
Germany 1
Ghana1 India
3UAE 1
Turkey 1Greece 1
Malaysia1
145 Speech and Language Professionals,
70 people with aphasia
30 friends and family,
22 others
We used the International Classi�cation of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to frame our questions.
We disseminated the survey via:
A joint project between CDDFT and a Newcastle University student aimed at increasing understanding of the use of
technology by people with aphasia, with the outcome of using this knowledge to drive service improvements.
Over half of all tablets were service provider owned (56%).Service users were signi�cantly more likely to own smart phones (80%).
Aphasia and Technology ReviewCounty Durham and Darlington NHS Trust
What hardware ?
What barriers ?
used for therapy to support communication
for social media - including pupose of use to support access to information
Which software?
267 respondents told us about 132 di�erent software programmes/ apps they use to support communication/ access information/ access therapy.
There were di�erences between groups: People with aphasia favoured main stream apps/ apps integral to their device (e.g Uber, Find my Friends, Grammerly, predictive texting). Apps that enhance access to life whilst minimising communicative demand. Speech and Language Therapists were more likely to recommend speech and language speci�c apps.Facebook was the most popular social media platform across all groups. People with aphasia/friends/family identi�ed the importance of social media in accessing support networks and information.Sixty eight percent of professionals said they used social media for their own clinical professional development but only 44% said they would recommend social media sites to people with aphasia/ their friends/family.
Kathy Cann and Louise Bulman
Technology has changed the landscape of communication for everyone.It’s potential impact in supporting access to life, therapy and
well -being for people with speci�c communication needs is as diverse as it is profound.
For lots more information and discussion of how our results relate to the evidence base, download the full aphasia friendly article here:
SCANME