water flooding m.tech

Upload: hameed-bin-ahmad

Post on 07-Jul-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    1/65

    T. SANTHOSHINI PRIYAENHANCED OIL RECOVERY

    ANNA UNIVERISTY

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    2/65

    SECONDARY RECOVERY PROCESS

     When oil production declines because of the hydrocarbon

     production from the formation, the secondary oil recovery

     process is employed to increase the pressure required to drive

    the oil to production wells.

     The mechanism of secondary recovery oil is similar to that of 

    the primary oil recovery except that more than one well bore is

    involved, and the pressure of petroleum reservoir is augmented

    or maintained artificially to force oil to the production wells.

    Secondary Recovery Process 2

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    3/65

    Secondary Recovery Process 3

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    4/65

    SECONDARY RECOVERY PROCESS

     The process includes the appli cation of a vacuum to a well ,

    the injection of gas, air, water, and/or aqueous solutions of 

    caustic and polymer .

     The decrease of pressure in the reservoir during primary oil

    recovery may be restored partially by injecting a gas into the

    reservoir to achieve a high pressure

    Secondary Recovery Process 4

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    5/65

    WHY WATERFLOODING?

     Most widely used fluid injection process

    It’s a “mature” technology

     Water availability is generally good

     Proven method to increase oil recovery

    Secondary Recovery Process 5

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    6/65

    WATER FLOODING

    Water is injected for two reasons:

    1) For pressure support of the reservoir (also known as void age

    replacement).

    2) To sweep or displace the oil from the reservoir, and push it

    towards an oil production well.

    Secondary Recovery Process 6

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    7/65

    WHEN TO WATER FLOODDefine your objectives

    Maximum oil recovery

    Highest investment efficiency

    Maximize net present value

    Minimize risk 

    Perform economics for various start up times, considering:

     Revenue stream (oil & gas)

     Injection requirements

    Cost of fluid handling & treatment 

    Cost of facilities

    Secondary Recovery Process 7

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    8/65

    WATER FLOODING

     Water flooding is utilized primarily as a secondary recovery

    technique, where the primary drive mechanism used to producethe oil (dissolved gas) is depleted.

     The injected water is discharged in the aquifer through several

    injection wells surrounding the production well and the

    injected water creates a bottom water drive on the oil zone

     pushing the oil upwards. Water is recovered from the water 

    table and injected into the reservoir, displacing the oil towards

    the target production wells.

     Because of the limited amount of dissolved gas remaining in

    solution, pumps are used to bring the oil to surface. 8

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    9/65

    WATER FLOODING

    The selection of injection water method depends upon the

    mobility rate between the displacing fluid (water) and the

    displaced fluid (oil).

    The water injection however, has some disadvantages:

      Reaction of injected water with the formation water can

    cause formation damage.

      Corrosion of surface and sub-surface equipment.

    Secondary Recovery Process 9

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    10/65

    SELECTION OF FLOODING PATTERNS

    The objective is to select the proper pattern that will provide

    the injection fluid with the maximum possible contact with

    the crude oil system.

    This selection can be achieved by

    1.   Converting existing production wells into injectors.

    2.   Drilling infill injection wells.

    Secondary Recovery Process 10

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    11/65

    TYPES OF WELL ARRANGEMENTS

    Essentially four types of well arrangements are used in

    fluid injection projects:

     Irregular injection patterns

     Peripheral injection patterns

     Regular injection patterns

     Crestal and basal injection patterns

    Secondary Recovery Process 11

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    12/65

    DISPLACEMENT OF OIL THROUGH RESERVOIR

    ROCKS BY WATER FLOODING (FIVE SPOT

    PATTERN)

    For water flooding the most common pattern of injection and

     production wells is a five-spot configuration

    Secondary Recovery Process 12

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    13/65

    IRREGULAR INJECTION PATTERNS

    Surface or subsurface topology and/or the use of slant-hole

    drilling techniques may result in production or injection wells

    that are not uniformly located.

    Some small reservoirs are developed for primary production

    with a limited number of wells and when the economics are

    marginal, perhaps only few production wells are converted into

    injectors in a non uniform pattern.

    Faulting and localized variations in porosity or

    permeability may also lead to irregular patterns.

    Secondary Recovery Process 13

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    14/65

    PERIPHERAL INJECTION PATTERNS

    Secondary Recovery Process 14

    The injection wells

    are located at the

    external boundary of 

    the reservoir and the

    oil is displaced

    toward the interior of the reservoir.

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    15/65

    CRESTAL AND BASAL INJECTION PATTERNS

    In crestal injection, as thename implies, the injectionis through wells located atthe top of the structure. Gasinjection projects typically

    use a crestal injection pattern.

    In basal injection, the fluidis injected at the bottom of the structure. Many water-

    injection projects use basalinjection patterns withadditional benefits beinggained from gravitysegregation.

    Secondary Recovery Process   15

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    16/65

    REGULAR INJECTION PATTERNS

    Due to the fact that oil leases are divided into square miles and

    quarter square miles, fields are developed in a very regular 

     pattern.

    The most common patterns are:

    The patterns termed inverted have only one injection well per 

     pattern. This is the difference between normal and inverted

    well arrangements.

    (Note: Four spot and inverted seven spot patterns are

    identical) Secondary Recovery Process 16

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    17/65

    DIRECT LINE DRIVE The lines of injection and

     production are directly

    opposed to each other 

     The pattern is

    characterized by two

     parameters

     a=distance between wellsof the same type

     d=distance between lines

    of injectors and producers

    Secondary Recovery Process 17

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    18/65

    STAGGERED LINE DRIVE

     The wells are in lines as in

    the direct line, but the

    injectors and producers are

    no longer directly opposed

     but laterally displaced by a

    distance of a/2

    Secondary Recovery Process 18

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    19/65

    FIVE SPOT

     Special case of staggered

    line, i.e., a=2d

    Secondary Recovery Process 19

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    20/65

    SEVEN SPOTThe injection wells are located at the corner of a hexagon with

    a production well at its centre

    Secondary Recovery Process 20

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    21/65

    NINE SPOT

    Similar to five spot but with an extra injection well drilled at

    the middle of each side of the square

    Secondary Recovery Process 21

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    22/65

    REGULAR

    INJECTION

    PATTERNS

    Secondary Recovery Process 22

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    23/65

    RECOVERY EFFICIENCY

    Secondary Recovery Process 23

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    24/65

    OVERALL RECOVERY EFFICIENCYThe overall recovery factor (efficiency) RF of any secondary or 

    tertiary oil recovery method is the product of a combination of three

    individual efficiency factors as given by the following generalized

    expression:

    R F=ED EA EV NP= NS ED EA EV

    Where

    RF = Overall recovery factor 

    NS = Initial oil in place at the start of the flood, STBNP = Cumulative oil produced, STB

    ED = Displacement efficiency

    EA = Areal sweep efficiency

    EV = Vertical sweep efficiencySecondary Recovery Process 24

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    25/65

    OVERALL RECOVERY EFFICIENCY

    The areal sweep efficiency EA

    Is the fractional area of the

     pattern that is swept by the

    displacing fluid.

    The major factors determining

    areal sweep are:

     Fluid mobility's

     Pattern type

     Areal heterogeneity

     Total volume of fluid

    injected

    The vertical sweep efficiency EV

    Is the fraction of the vertical

    section of the pay zone that iscontacted by injected fluids.

     The vertical sweep efficiency

    is primarily a function of:

     Vertical heterogeneity Degree of gravity

    segregation

     Fluid mobility's

     Total volume injectionSecondary Recovery Process 25

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    26/65

    OVERALL RECOVERY EFFICIENCY- AREAL SWEEP

    EFFICIENCY

    Fluid mobilities

    Pattern type

     Areal heterogeneity 

    Total volume of fluid injected

    Secondary Recovery Process 26

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    27/65

    OVERALL RECOVERY EFFICIENCY- VERTICAL

    SWEEP EFFICIENCY

     Vertical heterogeneity 

    Degree of gravity segregation

    Fluid mobilities

    Total volume injection

    Secondary Recovery Process 27

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    28/65

    OVERALL RECOVERY EFFICIENCY-

    DISPLACEMENTEFFICIENCY

    The displacement efficiency ED is the fraction of movable oil

    that has been displaced from the swept zone at any given time

    or pore volume injected. Because an immiscible gas injection

    or water flood will always leave behind some residual oil, ED

    will always be less than 1.0.

     All three efficiency factors (i.e., ED, EA, and EV) are variables

    that increase during the flood and reach maximum values at

    the economic limit of the injection project

    Secondary Recovery Process 28

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    29/65

    DISPLACEMENT EFFICIENCY

    Mathematically, the displacement efficiency is expressed as:

    Secondary Recovery Process 29

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    30/65

    DISPLACEMENT EFFICIENCY

    Secondary Recovery Process 30

    Where,

    Soi = Initial oil saturation at start of flood

    Boi = Oil at start of flood, bbl/STBŜo   = Average oil saturation in the flood pattern at a

     particular point during the flood

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    31/65

    DISPLACEMENT EFFICIENCY

     Assuming a constant oil formation volume factor during the

    flood life.

    The above equation is reduced to

    Where the initial oil saturation is given by

     However, in the swept area, the gas saturation is considered

    zero, thus

    So=1−Sw

    Secondary Recovery Process 31

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    32/65

    DISPLACEMENT EFFICIENCYThe displacement efficiency ED can be expressed

    more conveniently in terms of water saturation by

    substituting the above relationships into

    Secondary Recovery Process 32

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    33/65

    DISPLACEMENT EFFICIENCY

    Where,

    S W =average water saturation in the swept area

    S gi   = initial gas saturation at the start of the flood

    S wi = initial water saturation at the start of the flood

    If no initial gas is present at the start of the flood, Equation is

    reduced to

    Secondary Recovery Process 33

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    34/65

    DISPLACEMENT EFFICIENCY

    The displacement efficiency ED will continually increase at

    different stages of the flood, i.e., with increasing Sw.

    Secondary Recovery Process 34

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    35/65

    Secondary Recovery Process 35

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    36/65

    FACTORS TO CONSIDER IN WATERFLOODING

    1.   Reservoir Geometry

    2.   Lithology, Porosity, Permeability

    3.   Reservoir Depth

    4.   Continuity of Rock Properties5.   Fluid Saturations & Distributions

    6.   Fluid Properties

    7.   Relative Permeability

    8.   Other Considerations

    9.   Primary Drive Mechanism(s)

    Secondary Recovery Process 36

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    37/65

    1. RESERVOIR GEOMETRY

     The areal geometry of the reservoir will influence the location of 

    wells and, if offshore, will influence the location and number of 

     platforms required.

      If a water-drive reservoir is classified as an active water drive,

    injection may be unnecessary.

    Secondary Recovery Process 37

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    38/65

    2. LITHOLOGY AND ROCK PROPERTIES

     Reservoir lithology and rock properties that affect flood ability and

    success are:

    - Porosity - Permeability

    - Clay content - Net thickness

     The clay minerals present in some sands may clog the pores by

    swelling and deflocculating when water flooding is used, no exact data are

    available as to the extent to which this may occur.

    Tight (low-permeability) reservoirs or reservoirs with thin net thickness

     possess water-injection problems in terms of the desired water injection

    rate or pressure.

    Secondary Recovery Process 38

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    39/65

    3. RESERVOIR DEPTH

     Reservoir depth has an important influence on both the technical

    and economic aspects of a secondary or tertiary recovery project.

     Maximum injection pressure will increase with depth. The costs of 

    lifting oil from very deep wells will limit the maximum economic

    water  – oil ratios that can be tolerated, thereby reducing the ultimaterecovery factor and increasing the total project operating costs.

     In waterflood operations, there is a critical pressure

    (approximately 1 psi/ft of depth) that, if exceeded, permits theinjecting water to expand openings along fractures or to create

    fractures

    Secondary Recovery Process 39

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    40/65

    3. RESERVOIR DEPTH

      Drilling costs a function of depth

      Dual porosity systems

      Temperature gradient

      Oil viscosity Vs. temperature

      If primary operations were extensive

      Fracturing (max. injection pressure vs. depth)

      Fracture type (vertical vs. horizontal)

    Secondary Recovery Process 40

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    41/65

    4. RESERVOIR UNIFORMITY AND PAY

    CONTINUITY

     Substantial reservoir uniformity is one of the major physical

    criterions for successful waterflooding. For example, if the

    formation contains a stratum of limited thickness with a veryhigh permeability rapid channeling and bypassing will

    develop.

    Secondary Recovery Process 41

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    42/65

    5. FLUID SATURATIONS In determining the suitability of a reservoir for water flooding,

    a high oil saturation   that provides a sufficient supply of 

    recoverable oil is the primary criterion for successful flooding

    operations.

     Note that higher oil saturation at the beginning of flood

    operations increases the oil mobility that, in turn, gives higher 

    recovery efficiency.

    Secondary Recovery Process 42

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    43/65

    6. FLUID PROPERTIES

     The physical properties of the reservoir fluids have pronounced

    effects on the suitability of a given reservoir for further 

    development by water flooding.

     The oil viscosity has the important effect of determining the

    mobility ratio that, in turn, controls the sweep efficiency.

    Secondary Recovery Process 43

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    44/65

    7. RELATIVE PERMEABILITY

    Shape of relative permeability curves impacts oil bank

    formation

    End point relative permeability to water may impact injectivity

    Relative permeability from depletion doesn’t apply to water

    flooding

    Secondary Recovery Process 44

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    45/65

    8. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

     

    •   Pressure.

    •   Keep average reservoir pressure high for improved well.

    •   Hydraulics equipment costs are higher for increasing pressures.

    •   Water floods should always be evaluated; while considering the

     project life-cycle with other EOR methods in mind.

    Secondary Recovery Process 45

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    46/65

    9.PRIMARY RESERVOIR DRIVING

    MECHANISMSSix driving mechanisms basically provide the natural energy

    necessary for oil recovery:

    1. Rock and liquid expansion 2. Solution gas drive 3. Gas 

    cap drive. 4. Water dri ve 5. Gravity drainage drive 6.

    Combination dr ive 

    The primary drive mechanism and anticipated ultimate oil

    recovery should be considered when reviewing possible water 

    flood prospects.

    Secondary Recovery Process 46

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    47/65

    9. Primary Reservoir Driving Mechanisms cont.

     The approximate oil recovery range is tabulated below for various

    driving mechanisms.

     Note that these calculations are approximate and, therefore, oil

    recovery may fall outside these ranges.

    Secondary Recovery Process   47

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    48/65

    WATER FLOODAt the scale of field, the main factors governing the efficiency

    of a water flood are

     The Mobil i ty Ratio,

     Reservoir heterogeneity,

     Gravity.

    Secondary Recovery Process 48

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    49/65

    MOBILITY RATIO

     Mobility, k/µ, is defined as

     permeability of a porous

    material to a given phase

    divided by the viscosity of that

     phase

     Mobility ratio,  M , is defined as

    mobility of the displacing

     phase divided by the mobility

    of the displaced phase.

    Secondary Recovery Process 49

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    50/65

    MOBILITY RATIO

    Secondary Recovery Process 50

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    51/65

    Secondary Recovery Process 51

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    52/65

    MOBILITY

    In general, the mobility of any fluid λ  is defined as the ratio of 

    the effective permeability of the fluid to the fluid viscosity

    Secondary Recovery Process 52

    where,

    λ o, λ w, λ g = mobility of oil, water, and gas, respectively

    k o

    , k w

    , k g

     = effective permeability to oil, water, and gas,

    respectively

    k ro, k rw= relative permeability to oil, water, and gas,

    respectively

    k = absolute permeability

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    53/65

    MOBILITY RATIO

    Secondary Recovery Process 53

    Substituting for λ :

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    54/65

    OPTIMUM TIME TO WATERFLOODThe most common procedure for determining the optimum time to start

    water flooding is to calculate:

     Anticipated oil recovery

     Fluid production rates

     Monetary investment

     Availability and quality of the water supply

     Costs of water treatment and pumping equipment

     Costs of maintenance and operation of the water installation facilities

     Costs of drilling new injection wells or converting existing production

    wells into injectors

    Secondary Recovery Process 54

    FACTORS TO DETERMINE THE RESERVOIR

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    55/65

    FACTORS TO DETERMINE THE RESERVOIR

    PRESSURE (OR TIME) TO INITIATE A SECONDARY

    RECOVERY PROJECT

    Reservoir oil viscosity

    Water injection should be initiated when the reservoir 

     pressure reaches its bubble-point pressure   since the oil

    viscosity reaches its minimum value at this pressure. The

    mobility of the oil will increase with decreasing oil

    viscosity, which in turns improves the sweeping efficiency.

    Secondary Recovery Process 55

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    56/65

    FLOOD PATTERNS

    Secondary Recovery Process 56

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    57/65

    Stages of

    water

    flooding.

    Secondary Recovery Process 57

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    58/65

    OIL FIELD WATERPetroleum formed from the organic matter deposited with the

    sediments, migrated from what it is usually called the source

    rock into more porous and permeable sedimentary rock 

    (reservoir rock).

    Petroleum, i.e., oil and gas is less denser than water; therefore

    it tends to float to the top of a water body regardless whether 

    the water is on the surface or in the subsurface.

    Water associated with the petroleum in subsurface reservoir is

    called oilfield water. (i.e., any water associated with a

     petroleum deposit). Secondary Recovery Process 58

    CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    59/65

    CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF

    OILFIELD WATERAnalyzed for various chemical and physical properties.

    Most oilfield water contains organic and inorganic compounds.

    Secondary Recovery Process 59

    Inorganicconstituents

    Cations

     Anions

    Physicalproperties

    Dissolvedgases

    Stableisotopes

    Organicconstituents

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    60/65

    OIL FIELD WATER

    Must be considered in all Enhanced Oil Recovery Operations

    (EOR)

    There are seven major EOR  techniques

    1.   Steam injection

    2.   In-situ combustion

    3.   Carbon dioxide injection

    4.   Surfactant- polymer injection

    5.   Polymer injection

    6.   Alkaline (caustic) injection

    7.   Injection of petroleum miscible hydrocarbons

    Secondary Recovery Process 60

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    61/65

    OIL FIELD WATER Importance of water in EOR technology becomes obvious

    when one considers the amount of water necessary to recover 

    one barrel of oil.

     The water quality required may vary from excellent to poor.

    Secondary Recovery Process 61

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    62/65

    SECONDARY RECOVERY PROCESS –

    GAS INJECTION

    Gas injection methods can be subdivided into three categories:

    1) Pressure restoration

    2) Pressure maintenance

    3) Gas drive

    depending upon the way in which the gas is injected into thereservoir.

    Secondary Recovery Process 62

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    63/65

    PRESSURE RESTORATION

     The gas is injected into productive formation through one well

    while the other wells are closed until the pressure is restored

    throughout the reservoir.

     This may take as long as a year or more.

     When the desired reservoir pressure is reached , gas injection is

    stopped and all of the wells start producing oil under the

    influence of the artificially developed pressure.

    Secondary Recovery Process 63

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    64/65

    PRESSURE MAINTENANCE METHOD

     In this method, gas from producing well is recompressed and

    injected into the selected wells before the reservoir pressure is

    totally exhausted.

      In this method, some wells are operated as injection wells,

    whereas others are operated as production wells.

    Secondary Recovery Process 64

  • 8/19/2019 Water Flooding M.tech

    65/65

    GAS DRIVE METHOD Gas is injected into the reservoir under pressure and a

    continuous gas flow is maintained from injection wells to

     producing wells.

     The moving gas drives the oil in the form of a film, or gas

     bubbles ahead of the gas, toward the producing wells.